The story of Abdullah al Andalusi, aka Mouloud Farid, aka Wazir Leton Rahman, epitomizes the confusion and willful ignorance of the British political class. The British government wouldn’t be able to distinguish a “moderate” from an “extremist” if its life depended on it, and it does. The British intelligentsia will never, even to the point of suicide, admit that the hard and fast, never bridgeable distinction they believe exists between the “moderate” and “extremist” camps is more a figment of its imagination than reality. The British political elites will never, ever admit that much of what they consider to be “extremist,” and that they assume most Muslims in Britain reject, is actually established doctrine of mainstream Islam that Muslims reject only at risk of being declared apostates and heretics. This denial and willful ignorance will be the death of Britain, and Britain is racing eagerly toward its demise.
“By day, at heart of counter-terror policing. And by night, preacher of extremism,” by Andrew Gilligan, Telegraph, July 12, 2015 (thanks to Anne Crockett):
The Government watchdog which inspects police forces’ readiness for terrorism admitted that it employed one of Britain’s most notorious Islamic extremists.
For almost two years Abdullah al Andalusi, led a double life, the Telegraph can reveal.
By night, he taught that the terror group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) was “no different to Western armies,” said that “kaffirs,” non-Muslims, would be “punished in hell” and claimed that the British government wanted to destroy Islam.
By day, using a different name, he went to work for the same British government at the London offices of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC), the official regulator of all 44 forces in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The disclosures will be intensely embarassing [sic] to the Prime Minister, David Cameron, who has criticised parts of Britain’s Muslim communities for “quietly condoning” Islamist extremism.
HMIC’s staff, who number less than 150, are given privileged access to highly sensitive and classified police and intelligence information to carry out their inspections.
The inspectorate’s work includes scrutinising police forces’ counter-terrorism capabilities and top-secret plans for dealing with terror attacks.
It has also recently published reports on undercover policing and the use of informants.
HMIC admitted that Mr al Andalusi, whose real name is Mouloud Farid, had passed a security vetting check to work as a civil servant at the inspectorate.
He was subsequently promoted to executive grade, a management rank, placing him at the heart of the security establishment.
He was only sacked after bosses spotted him on television defending extremist Islamic positions on behalf of his organisation, the Muslim Debate Initiative, which is heavily dependent on Saudi money.
The inspectorate insisted that he did not handle classified material but former friends of Mr al Andalusi said he had done so.
“His work did involve security areas. He said he had a role in overseeing the police response to terrorism and there were areas he couldn’t talk about,” said one former colleague at the Muslim Debate Initiative, who asked to remain anonymous.
“He would discuss the reports that HMIC were working on and the data they needed to present.
“His story is so odd and so scandalous in many respects. He had these two completely incompatible lives that went on for years. He despised Britain, yet worked for the British government. He would talk about the right of oppressed people to take up arms against the oppressor and yet he was overseeing the police….
Under the name by which he was known to HMIC, Mouloud Farid, his links with the Muslim Debate Initiative were a matter of public record.
He was registered as a director of the organisation at Companies House, though he earlier this year changed to yet a third name, Wazir Leton Rahman, on the companies register.
“This man’s unsuitability for sensitive work should have been obvious from the start,” said Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Barr.
“There is a lack of understanding of different strains of Islam in the civil service. I will be asking why the systems designed to prevent this did not work.”
There certainly is a “lack of understanding of different strains of Islam in the civil service.” British officials assume that every Muslim is a moderate who abhors and rejects the violence committed in the name of Islam and in accord with the texts and teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah, and that everyone who believes otherwise is a racist, bigoted Islamophobe.
Mr al Andalusi, a prominent figure on the extremist lecture circuit, is closely associated with the extremist group Hizb ut Tahrir, which believes that voting and democracy are un-Islamic.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is committed to working toward the imposition of the Sharia all over the world.
He is also a strong supporter of the terrorist lobby group Cage, which sparked outrage earlier this year when it defended the Isil hostage-killer Mohammed Emwazi, “Jihadi John,” as a “beautiful” and “gentle” man who had been radicalised by MI5. Like Cage, Mr al-Andalusi fiercely supports the right of British citizens to travel to Syria to fight.
He spoke at a Cage rally outside his own employer’s parent department, the Home Office, to demonstrate against the arrest of the former Guantanamo detainee, Moazzam Begg, on Syria-related terror charges, later dropped. Alongside him were other high-profile extremists and hate preachers including Haitham al-Haddad and senior figures in Hizb ut Tahrir.
Mr al Andalusi has spoken at at least three other Cage events in the last ten months, including on September 20 last year when he claimed that, as part of its “war against Islam,” the British government wanted to force Muslims to eat non-halal meat.
He says that Western liberal society is committed to the “destruction” of all Muslim belief and shows on his Facebook page a picture a concentration camp with a Nazi swastika and “21st century” written on the watchtower.
In the foreground is a gallows with a short route to the hangman’s noose for “Islamists” and a longer route for “Muslim moderates.”…
In a talk at Queen Mary University, in East London, on 16 January, he asked why the al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra, was treated as a terrorist organisation by the West while the moderate Free Syrian Army was not.
He condemned memorials to 9/11, describing the terror attacks as “the day a vicious world empire [the US] found a publicly-acceptable excuse to bomb others, invade non-threatening nations, torture political dissidents and kill at least 300,000 innocent people.”
After Isil took over large portions of Iraq last year, he wrote that “most Muslims would be jubilant at the return of the caliphate [Islamic state], which is a vital obligation upon Muslims that has been conspicuously missing for so long.”
He condemned the group for killing civilians but said that the West had “no basis to judge Islamic State” because “IS are no different to Western armies and even some of the ‘founding fathers’ of Western nations… IS’s crime is being actually a good student of the West, right down to their corporate structure and organisation and ability to use social media.”
He said that “those who reject IS merely because IS’s school of thought is disagreeable to them should remember that Islam permits difference of opinion. To reject something as outside the fold of Islam, due to it being a different school of thought to one’s own, makes one a purveyor of disunity among Muslims.”…
One said that he was disturbed by a meeting at which he and Mr al Andalusi heard another man say he wanted to join al-Shabaab, an al-Qaeda franchise, and regarded civilian airliners as legitimate weapons of war. The former friend reported the conversation to police.
The former friend said Mr al-Andalusi used a number of psuedonyms and was always secretive about his real name but eventually revealed it in discussions with them.
Mr al Andalusi, who lives in a subsidised £750,000 housing association flat in Westminster, said last night that as Mouloud Farid he was “proud to work for a public watchdog which holds those in power to account. Cage are peaceful and not proscribed. Kaffir is a theological term which has no relation to non-Muslims.”….
Why is he living in subsidized housing when obviously he has gainful employ?
“Kaffir is a theological term which has no relation to non-Muslims” — that is an outright lie. Kaffir is generally translated as unbeliever or infidel, and it has everything to do with non-Muslims. The Qur’an declares that those Christians who believe that “Allah is Christ, the son of Mary” have “certainly disbelieved” (5:17, 72). The Arabic word used here is kafara, (كَفَرَ); it is a form of kufr, unbelief, and is related to kaffir, unbeliever.
abad says
If Muslims in the UK hate the UK so much then WHY ARE THEY THERE????
Alissa says
Engaged in the third jihad. That’s why.
Charli Main says
Muslims are here because they are following the instructions in the Koran to immigrate to the countries of Dar al Harb and work to turn them into Islamic States.
This piece of muslim filth is a part of the ever increasing muslim 5th column infiltrating every aspect of British society.
Thanks to brain dead morons like David Cameron and the rest of Britain´s political elites, the Islamisation of Britain is doing well and on track.
Bamaguje says
They are there to Islamize Britain, by stealth or overt Jihad.
Given the utter cowardice of UK’s Muslim appeasing dhimmi leaders, Britanistan may not be far off.
Carolyn says
It upsets me that they perpetuate the lie that non-Muslims want to destroy the Muslim religion, but they are rabid to destroy all the people, history and culture of everything that is non-Muslim.
jayell says
Once I was a child, and I spake like a child, and I thought childish thoughts, and amongst this lot was the idea that ‘everybody is basically nice’ and that ‘Islam is a nice, respectable, responsible religion’ and ‘people went to their nice mosques on Fridays and sang nice hymns and songs’, and ‘the nice muslim-type vicar-person would smile and kiss the babies’ then ‘everybody would go to the nice mosque hall next door and have (halal) tea. coffee and biscuits (which I did not realise had not been stunned before they were baked)……O.K., does anyone feel ill yet?
I believe that the quote carries on about growing up and ‘putting away childish things’ which here would include actually getting to know first-hand what Islam’s REALLY about. For a start ‘nice’ and ‘respectable’ aren’t quite the same concepts for someone coming from the Land of Mohammed, as is also their concept of ‘religion’ (with which our friends from the Third Reich might have felt more comfortable?). I came to realise that they don’t have a habit of singing songs and hymns, ‘nice’ or otherwise, because they don’t like music, no doubt because (to judge by the singing efforts of their Imams) they’re all tone-deaf. And if their ‘nice’ Imams smiled at the babies and kissed them, that would probably have been the prelude to something else that Jesus never told us about.
So, that’s rather a long-winded way of saying to Carolyn that, OK, ‘as a child I thought as a child’….etc, etc,….. and I certainly would NOT have wished any terminal harm on Islam (because it would never ever have occurred to me that Islam could have meant terminal harm to ME). But then I grew up, got to see what’s going on and why, and now by opinion is NOT quite the same. So if our devotees of Mohammed accused me of wishing to eliminate their guiding light, I regret that I could not in all honesty refute their accusations. And that would be neither unreasonable nor illogical because as you, Carolyn, so rightly observe…”but they are rabid to destroy all the people, history and culture of everything that is non-Muslim.” How can anyone with any sense of what is good, right, proper or reasonable possibly justify supporting anything but the strictly quarantined existence of anything remotely like THAT? And if you can’t quarantine it……………..?
Don Foss says
And London has a habit of electing mayors who are Islam defenders, apologists and Muzzie-loving girly-men who pander to the Islamists, and then lead the charge for bannng the entry visas for truth tellers like Michael Savage and Rober Spencer. Bottom line: Britain is pathetically and dangerously PC and has their collective heads in the sand. Adios UK; hello Britainistan.
cs says
Yes, or we reverse this trend or we are doomed.c
This Andaluzi goat abuser has been on TV and youtube several times, he is akin to Choudray, and still they employ a guy like this? This must be the tip of the iceberg, if they are so careless contracting an obvious cunt as this, just imagine the ones who are more discreet? There may be thousands working under cover.
jayell says
“Islam; a misunderstood, peaceful. non violent religion?” Yeah, well, that’s the media/advertising hype. But, of course, if this was in the commercial sphere you’d ignore all that and look at the write-ups in the consumer press instead, and then you’d get a totally different picture. Then you’d check the ‘small print’ (i.e., the bits just before & after the ‘nice quotes’ in the Qu’ran) and you’d notice that the ‘special offers’ are almost invariably so heavily limited and qualified as to make them effectively worthless compared with what they seem to be offering on first sight. Then you’d pop down to your local Trading Standards office and get the Legal Eagles there to drag the promoters of the “peaceful. non violent religion” through the courts on the grounds of gross misrepresentation. And take them to the financial cleaners.
Alissa says
“He says that Western liberal society is committed to the “destruction” of all Muslim belief and shows on his Facebook page a picture a concentration camp with a Nazi swastika and “21st century” written on the watchtower.”
As if.
john spielman says
i don ‘t blame islamists for their evil deeds, they are demonized and follow the beast (allah) I DO BLAME THE POLITICAL ELITE WHO WILLFULLY BOW TO THE BEAST!
Ayatrollah says
Does anybody catch the name he choose for himself. Al Andalusia ? In street English it means “the guy from Muslim Spain”.
Firebug says
Abdullah Al-Andalusi = Servant of Allah, from Andalus (Southern Spain).
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Does anybody catch the name he choose for himself. Al Andalusia ? In street English it means “the guy from Muslim Spain”.
Yeah, that’s the first thing I noticed. You’d think that’d make him the number on suspect of Moslem activism in England.
1492 was a very good year, and I’m not just talking about the discovery of America. 1683 was another very good year. We haven’t had one of those since. Now it’s all about empowering them by awarding them prerogative and free money, in other words helping them win.
Now that Europe is lousy with them, there can be no clearly delineated battle. France will fall one day in the not too distant future, much as Lebanon has fallen recently.
George S. says
Alhambra is a palace and fortress complex located in Granada, Andalusia, Spain. How dare this filthy, lying muzzie besmirch the great and historical place in Spain, Andalusia. It is one of the favourite places for Spanish people to visit and think about.
Did the muzzies ever offer something great when they invaded Spain and enslaved the population there? No. Muzzies have offered the world nothing, absolutely nothing at all in the last 1400 years – all their so-called scientific contributions are fallacies and lies. The so-called Arabic number system was actually developed in India by the Hindus. The so-called golden age of islam is a lie and myth.
One of the best pieces of music that I know that celebrates Alhambra, Spain is a classical guitar piece that was composed in 1896 in Granada by Spanish composer and guitarist Francisco Tárrega. It is called Recuerdos de la Alhambra (Memories of the Alhambra). Has islam ever contributed anything beautiful to the world? No – nothing. So enjoy the beauty of the west in this glorious guitar piece, an equivalent of which can never be found in islam.
don lesh says
Muslims have furthered the development and perfected the use of suicide vests.They trully are scientific geniuses !
Linde Barrera says
To George S.- Thank you for that link to the beautiful music. It was soooo lovely. Back in Dec.2014 I asked a question to the website of The Muslim Debate Initiative seeking the truth, and I was looking at various websites toward that goal of TRUTH. Thank God I found Jihad Watch. (I didn’t realize at that time that their website was really just a front for the Islamist agenda.) So my question was (remember I was in the infancy stage of learning) “Why is Islam called ‘The Religion of Peace’ when in the Holy book of Muslims, the Quran, it states ‘Kill the infidels wherever you may find them.’ ” I also told them I was asking as a Christian lady. The response I received from them was this: “That quote refers to a certain battle that took place in the year (they inserted a year) and applies to that battle. Period, end of story.” Since that time, thanks to the many educated and scholarly commenters of Jihad Watch, as well as Robert Spencer, of course, and his research – writing staff, I have learned that The Muslim Debate Initiative lied to me with that answer, and I have learned so much more. I do my best to share, that knowledge too. Example: The other day I needed a number for the city of New York, 311. So I asked the female operator: “Ma’am, did you know that in Islam they force young girls in many places to undergo female genital mutilation? And you can Google it for yourself, you don’t have to take my word for it.” The 311 operator was shocked.and replied, “No, I never heard of that.” So that is my small way of being a stealth Counter Jihadist. Take good care George.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
The response I received from them was this: “That quote refers to a certain battle that took place in the year (they inserted a year) and applies to that battle. Period, end of story.”
Funny, the dozens of damning quotes from Islam’s scriptures are explained away with some context or another so as to seem believable to a neophyte Infidel, but the Imams explain their real meaning on Fridays, and the Mujahidin invoke them and their real meanings as they go into a mass murder operation.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
He condemned memorials to 9/11, describing the terror attacks as “the day a vicious world empire [the US] found a publicly-acceptable excuse to bomb others, invade non-threatening nations, torture political dissidents and kill at least 300,000 innocent people.”
If Mr. Abdullah al Andalusi somehow loses his job, looking at this quote I can hereby pronounce him ready for a tenured position as a professor at an American university. That is how far removed from reality he is. Fictive to the point of weepy victimist desirability. Seem fairly pious, too. Plus, ya gotta love his stupid little skull cap, those are great.
KrazyKafir says
The dhimmi stooges, can’t and won’t, see anything that contradicts the biggest liberal lie of all time, that all cultures are equal. They certainly will not recognize India’s example that created Pakistan, or Serbia’s example that created Kosovo. They will never see it (civil war) coming, no matter how many times reality slaps them in the face, and it won’t wake them from their dhimmmi stooge stupors induced by their own biggest lie.
Greyhound Fancier says
If they think all cultures are equal, they ought to take a really really long vacation in a Muslim Crapistan and see how they like it.
umvra says
Migration to islamic holes would be preferable than a holiday. They could then build their dystopia there.
Jaladhi says
All these stories coming out about Muslims in UK as well as in other countries prove: 1) No Muslim can ever be trusted,
2) There are no moderate Muslims, they are all regular Muslims who are radicals, extremists, jihadis, …etc, etc.
Prey says
I remember once that people in the university of Southampton Islamic society gave his personal email id to me to contact him if I have any doubts regarding Islam. I can’t believe that these are the guys that are coming to preach in the university.
Voytek Gagalka says
Right. The British (and not only British) intelligentsia class consider as “extremist” only people who oppose jihad in any way or form, blind to to facts who is their friends or enemies. If not because many, many innocent people will suffer from such myopic policy, I would say to them: go ahead, jump to the abyss of self-destruction, you are not worth to be saved!
zulu says
Mosque linked to children’s suicide bombing DVD: Former chairman owned company that distributed chilling singalong film that glorified terror
– Firas al-Rawi’s bookshop was listed as sole UK distributor of chilling DVD
– Video showed girl vowing to follow in suicide bomber mother’s footsteps
– Al-Rawi was chairman of Leeds Grand Mosque before leaving for Kuwait
– He was arrested after child bought DVD in Bradford but was never charged
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3157374/Mosque-linked-children-s-suicide-bombing-DVD-Former-chairman-owned-company-distributed-chilling-singalong-film-glorified-terror.html#ixzz3fgyxsGi0
zulu says
OT
UK – Forget French and Mandarin – Arabic is the language to learn….courtesy of a drive by the British Council to boost the take-up of the language in state schools.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/forget-french-and-mandarin–arabic-is-the-language-to-learn-10382690.html
jayell says
Someone who learned Arabic once told me that the system by which it’s written (with vowel signs unclear or omitted) is so inaccurate that it’s possible to argue for years about what a written passage it supposed to mean. Or maybe that was just ‘Classical Arabic’ or whatever. Can anyone enlighten me about this? If there were any truth in that, it might explain why there is so much contradiction in Islam. But then, the fact that its founder was illiterate might explain everything, especailly if the great Allah tried to communicate with him using tablets of stone or some other kind of cosmic email.
Ah Clem says
Interestingly enough, this guy was called out by David Wood in 2010 after he posted comments sympathetic to the Fort Hood Massacre cause.
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2015/07/the-two-faces-of-abdullah-al-andalusi.html
zulu says
this is the video
Abdullah al-Andalusi on Fighting Unbelievers
Ah Clem says
Thanks zulu, I had missed that!
Evolution says
Such an ugly language. Makes me sick when I hear it.
Angemon says
So he was only dealt with when plausible deniability became impossible? Gee, that’s reassuring…
Paul says
The British government and the ‘intelligensia’ are not stupid or naive,
I don’t buy it for a minute. They’re completely complicit, THEY are the
problem, not so much the muslims who are just doing what their accursed
cult demands of them. Indeed, Anjem Choudary – as much as I despise him –
is more honest than them, he just tells it how it is. I know that this might
sound a little paranoid what I am saying, so I’ll finish with a good example.
The Muslim Brotherhood, designated a terrorist entity in Egypt, set up
in London. The government commissioned Tariq Ramadan – taqiyya
expert and grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood – to
investigate these claims and tell them what they wanted to hear.
David Wood says
I posted an article about Abdullah al-Andalusi defending the Fort Hood Massacre more than five years ago. Think about that. It has been a matter of record for more than five years that this guy defended the Fort Hood Massacre, and the British government had him working on its counterterrorism task force. Britain has lost it’s collective mind.
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2010/02/abdullah-al-andalusi-defends-terrorism.html
Jack Diamond says
He must have had them convinced he was a counter-counter-counter terrorist (spy) using the Muslim Debate Initiative to spy on the real terrorists, or they are as dumb as they appear and their “security vetting” is a bad joke worthy of a new British comedy series. But since Islam is peaceful and good and only a tiny minority of Muslims are extremists from so badly misunderstanding their religion, what kind of “security vetting” could have been in place to keep this from happening? And why not have Muslims in the most “sensitive” positions of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC), the official regulator of all 44 forces in England, Wales and Northern Ireland? Can anyone in Britain think of a reason? And those Arabic names are so confusing…why would anyone think Mouloud Farid, er Wazir Leton Rahman, was also Abdullah al-Andalusi (except he went on television, he felt safe enough that the government was stupid enough he could even go on television in his “extremist” alter ego). Too bad Peter Sellars isn’t around to play all three.
Jack Diamond says
and David Wood’s piece nails “al-Andalusi” on just why he defends the Fort Hood massacre:
“Both passages from Abdullah attempt to show that, since America is at war in Afghanistan and Iraq, attacks against U.S. military targets (such as Fort Hood) are viable. But this exposes Abdullah’s true views. Major Nidal Malik Hasan is neither an Afghani nor an Iraqi. American soldiers are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq because there are wars there. But Hasan is an American soldier. Thus, if Abdullah views Hasan’s attack as justified by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, he must believe that the United States is at war with Islam (for this is the only connection between Hasan and Afghanistan/Iraq). But if the United States is at war with Islam, then any Muslim is justified in attacking U.S. military bases right here in the United States.”
From that to now: “Mr al Andalusi has spoken at at least three other Cage events in the last ten months, including on September 20 last year when he claimed that, as part of its “war against Islam,” the British government wanted to force Muslims to eat non-halal meat.
He says that Western liberal society is committed to the “destruction” of all Muslim belief and shows on his Facebook page a picture a concentration camp with a Nazi swastika and “21st century” written on the watchtower.”
Of course a Nazi swastika and a concentration camp could just as easily be symbols for the triumph of Islam in the 21st century….oh, but I keep forgetting Muslims are the new Jews (abrogation again).
Gbox says
This would be consistent with the UK race to cultural suicide. They are determined to not lose the race with Sweden.
Mr UPSIDE DOWN says
I Have said it before we Brits give other enough rope…we watch to see how they use that,,,,if they choose to hang themselves…fine….we’re not as daft as one might think…we live on an Island..its quite small…there is no where to run and no where to hide…..also..one sees the royal family four generations in line for the royal thrown..
the State…as every intention of seeing our Christian royality take their rightful place a hundred yrs from now……..and anything that seems to want to threaten that is seen as the enemy….of the people….also..the Military the Army navy airforce swear alligence to the Queen,to defend her,and her decendents….
voegelinian says
Robert Spencer notes that: The British government wouldn’t be able to distinguish a “moderate” from an “extremist” if its life depended on it, and it does.
That’s because it’s virtually impossible to make that distinction (as Spencer himself used to note, years ago).
voegelinian says
I.e., the problem is not, as Spencer’s wording implies, that the British government is making this distinction incorrectly, using a flawed methodology which should be supplemented by a practicable methodoloy; the problem is that a) the British government believes it can make the distinction at all. It is a distracting red herring to imply that the only fault of the British government in this regard is that it is indulging in a methodology that can’t see the obvious extremists under its nose. Yes, of course this is a glaring fault of the British government in this regard; but deeper than that is its untested assumption that on a macro scale we can, in fact, distinguish the dangerous Muslim from the harmless Muslim.
And of course, this is the assumption of the entire Western mainstream (and in certain permutations it even seeps into the cracks and under the doorways of the Counter-Jihad itself).
Edgar Allen says
It is not fair to expect Muslims to do any different than this guy. All over YouTube, we see Muslims screaming at us that their first allegiance is to Islam. I believe them We all should believe them.
“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” Matthew: 6:24
The verse is about 2 masters, God and money. But it is very applicable to the split loyalties all Muslims must feel. Without hatred or malice, there really should be NO Muslims allowed in any security, defense, intelligence or otherwise sensitive position. The temptation for them to serve their other master, the Islamic Ummah, is too much.
Jack Diamond says
just to beat a dead horse…“Kaffir is a theological term which has no relation to non-Muslims”
Liar liar.
“Jews and Christians who do not follow the Prophet Muhammad are kuffaar. They will go to Hell.”
–Grand Mufti Saudi Arabia 2006
“The word kaffir is a very pejorative, negative, disparaging term. When you call someone a kaffir, they are not worthy to be associated with.”
–Dr. Taj Hargey, Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford
“Kaffir, the worst word that can be written, a sign of infidelity, disbelief, FILTH, a sign of dirt.”
–Sheikh Feiz, Saudi imam
“The Fatwa Council states Jews and Christians are both kuffar (apostates) and mushrikeen (polytheists)
kuffar because they deny and reject the truth, mushrikeen because they worship someone other than Allah.”
–Islamqa.com
Shaykh ‘Abd al-Aze ibn Baar said “kufr is denial and concealment of the truth…shirk is devoting acts of worship to something other than Allah..a kaaffir may be called a mushrik and a mushrik may be called a kaafir, as Allah says ‘and whoever invokes (or worships) besides Allah, any other (god) of whom he has no proof, then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely, Al-Kaafiroon (disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) will not be successful (23:117). ‘Verily whosoever set up partners (in worship) with Allah, then Allah had forbidden Paradise to him and Fire will be his abode.’ (5:72).
‘Calling on anything other than Allah is called shirk, but in Surat Al-Mu’minoon it is called kufr. Allah says in (Sura Nine) “they (disbelievers)(Jews & Christians) want to extinguish Allah’s light (Islamic Monotheism) with their mouths.” (and) “It is He who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it superior over all religions even though the mushrikoon (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers) hate it.’ (al-Tawbah 9:32-33).
“Here Allaah calls the kuffaar kuffaar and He calls them mushrikeen. This indicates that a kaffir may be called a mushrik and a mushrik may be called a kaafir. There are many similar verses and ahadeeth.
–Islamqa.com
“According to the Raddu ‘l-Muhtar (vol. iii, p. 442), there are five classes of kafirs or infidels:
Those who do not believe in the Great First Cause,
Those who do not believe in the Unity of God, as the Sanawiyah who believe in the two eternal principles of light and darkness,
Those who believe in the unity of God, but do not believe in a revelation,
Those who are idolaters,
Those who believe in God and in a revelation, but do not believe in the general mission of Muhammad to the whole of mankind, as the Christians, a sect of the Jews (sic).
(Hughes’ Dictionary of Islam, p. 260)
Sayid Sharif Jurjani says: “Mankind are divided into two parties, namely those who acknowledge the mission of Muhammad, or those who do not believe in it. Those who do not believe in his mission are either those who reject it and yet believe in the inspiration and divine mission of other prophets, as the Jews and the Christians, and also the Majusi (Fire Worshippers); or those who do believe in any revelation of God’s will. Those who do not believe in any revelation from God are either those who acknowledge the existence of God, as the Brahma (Buddhists?), or those who deny the existence of a Supreme Ruler, as the Dahri or atheists.
Those who do not acknowledge Muhammad as an inspired prophet are either those who do it wilfully and from mere enmity, or those who do not acknowledge it from reflection and due study of the subject. For the former is eternal punishment, and for the latter that punishment is not eternal. There are also those who, whiles they are Muslims, are not orthodox in the belief; these are heretics, but they are not kafirs. ”
–answeringislam.com
Andrew says
http://abdullahalandalusi.com/2015/07/12/a-response-to-andrew-gilligans-disingenuious-distortion-of-my-views/
Jack Diamond says
another goldmine (well, fool’s gold) of disinformation for fans of verbal diarrhea.
mortimer says
Duplicitous Abdullah al Andalusi believed that 1) “most Muslims would be jubilant at the return of the caliphate” 2) “no basis to judge Islamic State” 3)IS’s crime is being actually a good student of the West.
Responses:
1) 65% of Muslims worldwide support a caliphate-dictatorship.
2) kafirs are not allowed to pass judgment on Islam by Sharia law.
3) ISIS is immitating Mohammed, a pedophile, polygamist, pirate, prevaricator, pimp and psychopath. Western civilization is based on the reverse of those principles.
mortimer says
Duplicitous Abdullah al Andalusi is a PERFECT example of the Islamic use of TAQIYYA which the honorable British police don’t know about.
First order of business for British police is to learn the FULL DOCTRINE of TAQIYYA and other forms of SACRALIZED ISLAMIC DECEPTION.
medaber_emet says
Dear all
I’m sorry if my words sound pessimistically extreme
England is to be conquered by Islam
once they feel they have enough power to complete this overthrown
a civil war will start
but the Christians English don’t make enough children today so they will not stand against the masses
of young Muslim men that will kill all the christian men and rape their woman and take them as war booty
the christian English nation and culture in UK is to be extinct withing 25-50 years
that’s my estimate
can anyone refute that ?
Baucent says
I’m sorry I have to laugh at this story , it’s so absurd. He has made the British authorities look like the total fools they of course are.
How did he get past the security vetting which must have been done by MI5?
But he is so brazen to take part in TV debates and demonstrations supporting Islamist causes, apparently believing or not caring if he was exposed.
Then there is the three alias, It’s a good bet that he was drawing three unemployment benefits as well.
Celtic says
Lol, “how did he make it pass the MI5 security observations”?
The MIF and the CIA have a long history of supporting Jihadism. They want to see a conflict between westeners and Muslims – this is why our “leaders” and intelligence is so “incompetent” – they are not. They have an agenda and we are not on their team. 7/7 bombings? British Intelligence was on board. 9/11? Same same.
Don’t be so foolish and think that the gigantic intelligence apparatus serves anything else but the aims of the anglo-american empire. You are just a meaningless citizen of this empire – and you can be sacrificed for the goals of the empire in the same way that you sacrifice a pawn in a game of chess.
I know this is too hard to accept for people who cannot believe that branches of their own governments would actually kill US/British citizens in order to get what they want.
So Islam is not the only enemy.
Lioness says
EVERY muslim working for the police should be closely observed for ties to ISIS. They practice deceit in order to advance their cause, and getting into the police force is a perfect way to deceive the gullible Brits. Who in his right mind would hire muslims for top security jobs, or any kind of job for that matter. If they are not jihadis, they are a nuisance with constant demands for special privileges. Get that through your thick skulls, Britain.
Terkel says
The problem the UK security services have is their default mode, when they actually do catch Muslim terrorists is to turn them to work for the UK security services. They have been told countless times how Muslims lie to non Muslims , hence the thousands of jihadis formerly on watch lists are free to plan and carry out terrorist murder and mayhem here.
Medaber emet (yes, I’m sure you do speak truth), I don’t know if you’re in Israel or the States, but you should know that we’re very much aware of what Islam plans for we Brits, and our networks work constantly against it. It doesn’t help that not only do we have to fight the Muslim Menace, but the loony fascist lefties, and dangerous groups who want to Islamophobia illegal. This is supported by those who want to outlaw all sorts of anti…isms, and they haven’t got the slightest idea of how they themselves will be gagged if these stupid ideas become law.
We’ve plans, so please don’t worry about us.
Vox populi says
One day, maybe, UK will wake up … and hopefully it will not be too late…
bassi says
It is amazing!!
ISIS on the doorstep and the dumb administration and all those pretending to be protecting the honest people, are busy m****b*ting ———– and to let this dog stay on in the country and exploit the taxpayers
How many hardworking people have the privilege of a home that expensive? While the true Brits toil these dogs arrive from allover and set up to advance their cause and plan destruction. Racist as it may sound no one with a background in this mad religion should be given a position of responsibility in a country. After all they will never have anything other than retarded sharia to look at in their own lands
BC says
I Do not see anywhere in this report what has happened, if anything to this person. Has he been arrested or is he still going about his business?