• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Sharia, Bans Seattle Counter-Terror Ad

Aug 13, 2015 12:45 pm By Robert Spencer

AFDIFacesofterrorismFacesIt’s very strange. Eugene Volokh writes about this ruling in the Washington Post, in a piece entitled, “Transit agency may reject factually false ads.” What in our AFDI ad is factually false? Volokh quotes this from the ruling:

Plaintiffs’ proposed ad states, in prominent text: “The FBI Is Offering Up To $25 Million Reward If You Help Capture One Of These Jihadis.” That statement is demonstrably and indisputably false. The FBI is not offering a reward up to $25 million for the capture of one of the pictured terrorists. The FBI is not offering rewards at all, and the State Department offers a reward of at most $5 million, not $25 million, for the capture of one of the pictured terrorists.

Plaintiffs do not, and cannot, refute those basic facts.

In reality, our ad was a close copy of an ad that the FBI had originally run, before it was taken down after complaints from Leftists and Muslims. The FBI ad stated, “Stop a Terrorist. Save Lives. Up to $25 Million Reward.” The reward may indeed have come from the State Department, but the FBI ran the ad, as was clear from coverage at the time. It light of that, it’s simply hair-splitting so as to arrive at a predetermined conclusion to say that our ad was rejected because our adumbration of the FBI ad, “The FBI is offering up to $25 million reward if you help capture one of these jihadis,” was inaccurate. The FBI offered that reward in its own ad, and while the State Department insignia was on their ad, their ad didn’t specify that the reward came from the State Department.
Both our ad and the FBI ad were actually rejected for the same reason: because Seattle Metro officials, and now the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, were afraid of angering Muslims and Leftists who claimed that the ad was offensive. Wanted posters are only offensive to criminals. The actual agenda is to keep the public ignorant of and complacent about the jihad threat, so that jihadis can advance unimpeded.

“9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Sharia, Bans Seattle Counter-Terror Ad,” by Pamela Geller, Breitbart, August 12, 2015:

The clowns on the 9th Circuit court have ruled that an FBI global terrorism ad poster cannot run because it might upset Muslims.

This all started back in 2013, when the FBI was running a terrorism awareness campaign featuring bus ads depicting photos of sixteen of the world’s Most Wanted Terrorists.

This was a publicity campaign sponsored by the Joint Terrorism Task Force for the State Department’s Rewards for Justice (RFJ) program. The ad featured the world’s leading global terrorists. As it happened, all but one were Muslim. Islamic supremacists and their leftist lapdogs demanded the want ad come down, claiming it was insulting to Muslims. The FBI caved and pulled the Seattle-area bus ads featuring the “Faces of Global Terrorism” after receiving complaints “that the ads stereotype Muslims.”

My organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), believed that this public awareness message was critical to national security and should run. We are constantly being clubbed with the claim that “moderate Muslims” abhor and reject the acts of terrorism that are constantly committed in the name of their religion, so why would they object to a wanted poster featuring Islamic terrorists who supposedly have twisted and hijacked their peaceful religion? Why would “moderate Muslims” provide cover for jihad terror? Why, indeed.

AFDI submitted a virtual copy of the FBI ad to run on Seattle transit. The cowards at Seattle King Metro refused to run the ad, claiming that it was disparaging to Muslims. Reality is disparaging to Muslims?

We sued Seattle King Metro. Predictably, the liberal fascists in Seattle sided with the supremacists. We appealed to the clowns on the notorious 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. And now they, as expected, ruled in favor of sharia and supremacism.

Of all the free speech legal battles I am embroiled in, this one is the most absurd. It illustrates the crippling submission and capitulation of government authorities to Islamic supremacist demands. In this ruling, Judge Susan Graber presented the facts in a ridiculously skewed manner: “The FBI is not offering a reward up to $25 million for the capture of one of the pictured terrorists,” she claimed in her ruling. “The FBI is not offering rewards at all, and the State Department offers a reward of at most $5 million, not $25 million, for the capture of one of the pictured terrorists.” She went on to claim that we had not refuted “those basic facts,” which she claimed was “beside the point.” She asserted that it was “indisputable that Plaintiffs’ proposed ad is plainly inaccurate as a simple matter of fact.”

Everything Graber says here is absurd. Yet AP said in the same vein: “The FBI is not offering rewards at all, and the State Department offers a reward of at most $5 million, not $25 million, for the capture of one of the pictured terrorists.” It added that “the judges said Metro’s rejection ‘likely was reasonable.’ ‘Nothing in the record suggests either that Metro would have accepted the ad with the same inaccuracy if only the ad had expressed a different viewpoint or that Metro has accepted other ads containing false statements,’ the ruling said.”

The truth, however, is that we simply ran the FBI ad, with no substantive changes. Seattle Metro accepted the FBI ad and then rejected ours after the FBI caved to Muslim demands to take the ad down. The AFDI ad is exactly the same as the FBI ad that was taken down, except for the attribution and the background color. We didn’t change the amount of the reward for capture of the terrorists, or the source of that reward: our information came straight from the FBI ad, and any assertion to the contrary is a product of Graber’s febrile imagination.

The mainstream media, meanwhile, is just as clueless and compromised. The Associated Press piece that the Seattle Times picked up bore the headline, “Federal court: Anti-Muslim group can’t post ads on buses.” (I was not called for comment — of course.)

The headline reads “anti-Muslim” when in fact we are not anti-Muslim but anti-jihad – that is, against the jihad terrorism that we are always told Muslims in the U.S. reject. But quisling members of the mainstream media can’t say that we are anti-jihad, because most people are anti-jihad, and they want to make sure that no one sympathizes with a cause they have deemed outside the bounds of political correctness.

The AP article read: “The group — whose leader, Pamela Geller, organized the Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest in Texas that exploded in violence in May — has similar bus ads in other cities and has gone to court with mixed results after some transportation officials rejected them.” Our contest didn’t “explode in violence,” it was attacked by Islamic jihadists. And it wasn’t called the “Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest.” We don’t recognize Muhammad as a prophet. Is the AP a Muslim media company? Does it refer to Jesus Christ as “our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ”?

AP also claimed that our law firm, the American Freedom Law Center, “has a mixed record on court fights over ads in other cities.” Is a record of consecutive wins a “mixed record”? We won them all — with exception of Boston. We won Detroit, they appealed, and we are still in the throes of that process.

Also, why didn’t AP show the actual ad, so that people could make their own judgments?

We will never give up fighting for the freedom of speech and we will never stop telling the truth about the global jihad. We will appeal to the US Supreme Court.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: American Freedom Defense Initiative, dhimmitude, FBI, Featured, free speech, Useful idiots Tagged With: Seattle Metro


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Paleologos says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 1:22 pm

    This is very sad, Robert.

    Is the U.S. going down the slippery slope that is traveled by the U.K.?

    (Embracing islamic law, and thereby putrefying its legal system.)

    I hope not.

    Furthermore, has the world gone mad? We absolutely should be … not only angering muslims, but physically defeating these scum that are slaughtering infidels worldwide.

    Oh yes, ladies and gentlemen … Isn’t it obvious?

    We must bring back the Crusades!

    R/

    Paleologos … a Catholic Crusader 🙂

    • john spielmaan says

      Aug 13, 2015 at 2:02 pm

      so, change the dollar figure to 5 MILLIION not 25 million AND RESUBMIT!!

    • david wilson says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 4:40 am

      Don’t blame us, we’re following you.

  2. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    What in our AFDI ad is factually false?

    What is false here is your belief that facts have anything to do with reality. The judge was looking at your motivation, your intent. We live in an age of Robertsonian justice. The Chief Justice based his decision on the clear intent of what was meant in the ACA, and ruled accordingly. The law isn’t what is says, it is what was meant. And then he had to spend 23 pages explaining why “established by the state” doesn’t really mean established by a state. These are difficult times in which we live, and this poor judge was forced to “adopt a reading” that dealt with your intent and meaning. These two things are malleable, but remember that the U.S. Constitution is a living document, which is to say malleable.

  3. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 1:44 pm

    The headline reads “anti-Muslim” when in fact we are not anti-Muslim but anti-jihad…

    There is no separating Islam from Jihad mass murder. To paraphrase Judge Susan Graber, it is a “basic fact” that Jihad mass murder is inseparable from Islam, one of the world’s great religions, one of the three Abrahamic faiths, which makes the distinction between Moslems and Jihad “beside the point” and that this distinction is false is “indisputable and plainly inaccurate as a simple matter of fact.”

    So there.

    • IQ al Rassooli says

      Aug 15, 2015 at 6:11 pm

      Dear readers

      “one of the world’s great religions, one of the three Abrahamic faiths” is not only an absurd and false statement but also obscene for the following~

      The only conclusion that explains the enormous number of Discrepancies, Distortions, Abnormalities and Stupidities that fill Muhammad’s Quran is that no angel called Gabriel and no god called Allah ever revealed anything to Muhammad because~

      Every letter, word, verse and chapter in the Quran are the sole product of Muhammad’s imagination, the secretions of his warped mind but cleverly projected into the unsuspecting mouths of Allah & Gabriel to give them the aura of sanctity & divinity

      Therefore Allah is most certainly NOT the God of Jesus Moses and Abraham hence Islam is NOT a religion but a CULT belief system, the cult of Muhammad

      Case CLOSED!

      IQ al Rassooli
      Kafir & Proud!

  4. Wellington says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 2:12 pm

    The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is either the most liberal or just about the most liberal of all Circuit Courts. This is why for a very long time now it has regularly been known as the 9th Circus Court of Appeals. If I’m not mistaken, it has had more of its rulings overruled by the Supreme Court than any other Circuit Court, though the Supreme Court nowadays is no real cause to celebrate since there are only really three truly sensible and reliable people left on it (Alito, Thomas and Scalia).

    • Kathy Brown says

      Aug 13, 2015 at 2:24 pm

      You read my mind Wellington-in the legal community, the 9th is indeed the ‘9th Circus’. Bear in mind that they’re the court which-notwithstanding TWO referendums by the good people of California BARRING same-sex marriage (Prop 8), nonetheless overruled it. TWO separate referenda!

      So this is small change for them.

      And you’re right, again, in disparaging the Supremes. Indeed-in its present configuration, it lacks all authority. And it’s the CJ himself-Roberts-who’s reduced it to a standing joke.

      God help us and save us, these United States of America. Very hard-hitting post Wellington-are you sure you’re not hiding a JD from us?

      • Wellington says

        Aug 13, 2015 at 3:10 pm

        I do indeed have a JD, Kathy, as some old-time commenters here at JW already know. I believe you are a lawyer too. Hope you are doing well.

    • Angemon says

      Aug 13, 2015 at 4:07 pm

      Wellington posted:

      “This is why for a very long time now it has regularly been known as the 9th Circus Court of Appeals.”

      An expected decision, then, seeing which side the clowns are – Reza Aslan, Keith Ellison, etc.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 13, 2015 at 7:04 pm

      Good to hear from our two lawyers here.

      And of course, there is nothing “liberal” in the true sense about this, Wellington. I would instead characterize this decision as hard-leftist. More appalling appeasement of savagery.

  5. Westman says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 2:41 pm

    It’s amazing how easily a new generation can throw away the rights and freedom paid by the blood, tears, and sacred honor of their ancestors. And for what – a few more years of appeasement with an exponentially increased cost or capitulation at the end?

    There has never been another ideology that literally refers to members as, and intends to make everyone it allows to live, a slave. Would the Civil War and Civil Rights simply be footnotes in history or will that history be blotted out by the supremist ideology as if it never existed?

    The former slaves of the South were controlled by rulings and legislation referred by the name “Jim Crow”. Perhaps in the same spirit we should coin the term “Grabber” as in “Freedom Grabber” in honor of the honorable Judge Susan Graber. Additional “b” intended. Future laws, rulings, and actions promoting Islam could be called the “Grabber Laws”.

  6. Stephanie says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 3:04 pm

    “… because it might(!!) UPSET(?) Muslims.”

    I am UPSET of their ‘God’ allah’s sadistic qur’anic paragraphs 4:56, 8:12, 47:4, 9:5, 9:29, 9:111, 10:4, 6:70, …

    http://192.96.206.71/quranic-amputations-to-sadist-allah.html

  7. PRCS says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm

    The Seattle Times article states:

    “The group — whose leader, Pamela Geller, organized the Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest in Texas–”

    And then states”

    “an ad that included the winning entry of the “Draw Mohammad Contest.”

    It’s obvious that either staff writers-or an editors-are very confused about the event’s name and it’s purpose.

    The Times is not alone in doing this, of course.

  8. mortimer says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 4:35 pm

    Law of hurt feelings. How can a judge be so unintellectual?

    An ideology that calls for genocide should be critiqued and condemned by all right-thinking people…especially judges.

    Does the judge remember the Nuremburg Trials? Genocidal Nazism was put on trial. Today genocidal jihadism is on trial.

    • Dave J says

      Aug 13, 2015 at 7:14 pm

      Exactly.

      Since when is (speech that) “might upset someone” grounds for censorship, repression and criminalization?

      Behold the vacuousness, intellectual dishonesty and moral cowardice on the part of those midgets advancing the Liberal/Sharia mindset.

      Meanwhile the Muslim Murderers continue, hundreds of innocents are being slaughtered every day.

      That definitely upsets me.

  9. Oliver says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 4:44 pm

    Who appointed this judge? I would bet it was a dem.

  10. Champ says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm

    FACES OF GLOBAL TERRORISM

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    obama’s face should be pictured there …

  11. templar says

    Aug 13, 2015 at 11:28 pm

    What else would you expect from a junky hippie art fagg city like Seattle.

  12. Timothy says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 9:10 am

    The Dhimmii in the Western world continues. Here in Florida yesterday I watched on the news how an exclusive muslim prayer room is soon to be opened at the Orlando International Airport. This is despite the fact there already exists an all faith chapel. This was not good enough for the muslims, and the airport, to appease a new airline coming from Kuwait soon, capitulated. It appears that the Western world truly has gone mad. Robert, keep up the good fight, and stay safe please. I’m sure you’re under a hateful watch by the stealth jihadists.

  13. CC says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 8:20 pm

    Simply omit any specific dollar figure and say “the FBI is offering huge rewards for any information leading to the arrest of these most wanted men”

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.