• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Australia: Muslim women complain that anti-terror laws make them too frightened to report domestic violence

Aug 11, 2015 4:59 pm By Robert Spencer

Niqab374This bizarre bid for the ever-coveted victimhood status is based on the proposition that Australia’s anti-terror laws are “Islamophobic,” you see, and thus make Muslim women distrustful of Australian authorities, to the extent that they will not hurry to them to turn in their Muslim husbands for domestic abuse. This is absurd on several levels, not least because the Qur’an says, “Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for Allah’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34). In light of this divine sanction given to domestic violence, Muslim women all too often would face ostracism and alienation from their family and community if they dared to go to non-Muslim authorities to complain of domestic violence.

That’s the real reason why Muslim women don’t often report domestic violence, but it is unlikely to be mentioned in the Australian Muslim Women’s Centre for Human Rights’ report, which is likely instead to cast about for non-Muslim scapegoats to explain this reluctance. And in fastening on Australia’s anti-terror laws as that scapegoat, it reveals its real agenda. Imagine an Australia in which the anti-terror laws have been scrapped for being “Islamophobic” and making Muslim women feel vulnerable. Do you think that in that Australia, as the bombs explode and the jihad advances, that Muslim women, finally reassured, will be rushing to report domestic violence to Australian authorities before those authorities flee the collapsing country?

“Muslim women ‘made more vulnerable to violence by anti-terrorism laws,'” Australian Associated Press, August 10, 2015:

The introduction of anti-terrorism laws in Australia has made Muslim victims of family violence afraid to contact authorities for protection, an advocacy group says.

Victoria’s Royal Commission into Family Violence was due to hear from the Australian Muslim Women’s Centre for Human Rights on Tuesday.

The organisation said in its submission Muslim women were “invisible” in the debate over family violence.

This was compounded by Muslims being made to feel their community was being targeted or treated unfairly by authorities under anti-terrorism laws.

“This has developed into apprehensiveness about the Australian legal system and a mistrust of both government and the legal system,” the submission said.

Muslim women who had experienced racial violence in public, such as being insulted or having their religious garments forcibly removed, were even less likely to ask for help if they were being abused at home, the centre said.

Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence, according to the centre’s submission.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", Australia, claiming victim status, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Australian Muslim Women’s Centre for Human Rights


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. mortimer says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 5:21 pm

    The Leftarded cultural Marxists LOVE IT when supremacist Muslims disguise themselves as VICTIMS! That allows them to continue the attacks on European civilization…THE VILLAIN! It also allows the Leftards to put on their SUPERMARXIST capes and fight the nasty free-speech Europeans and DEFEAT THEM! Uncle Toms like Ayaan Hirsi Ali can also be attacked as honorary Europeans and accused of ‘racism’ as well.

    Muslim women are the key to controlling Islamdom! When the women are whipped into silence and complicity, they can control Muslim families and their cohesiveness is used then as a weapon to threaten and control the non-Muslim minorities.

    Brainwashed, Stockholm-syndrome Muslimahs have shown themselves capable of terrorist acts as well.

    Islam creates violence-prone Zombies ready to commit murder and die for this revolting Death Cult.

    • Scott M says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 5:41 am

      That’s right, Mortimer; this is NOTHING more than a cult, a death cult at that. I am constantly astonished at how ‘human rights’ activists – The Big Touts, totally IGNORE the fundamental and incredibly obvious abasement of everything decent by muslims – yet hold others (US) to different standards. As Salman Rushie said the other day in relation to the fawning media apologists – ” This is fear cloaked as ‘respect” – fear of offending muslims (hoping the crocodile will eat them last, as such).

    • France is finished says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 8:25 am

      Good comment Mortimor…But surely this “death cult” has nothing to do with Islam we are told by the left-wing media?
      Where are the equivalent Buddhist, Shinto, Christian and Hindu “fanatics” that are distorting the peaceful message of their religion…Oh that’s right, they don’t exist as their religions are inherently peaceful unlike Islam.
      Why on earth are western countries still allowing muslim immigration? The more we do the more we get victim stories like this one. Instead of gay marriage and global warming, how about they put Islamic immigration to a vote via a referendum. Referendums are used regularly in Switzerland and other countries that are TRULY democratic, but not in Australia where muslim immigration continues unabated.

      • ECAW says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 9:28 am

        Shame about the defeatist name. France is not finished anymore than Britain (as Robert Spencer used to say) or so many other Western countries. They’re all on the ropes and the capitulation to Islam may turn out to be terminal but any number of things may intervene, including a mass waking up or civil war or a nuclear exchange or who knows what else. You are being premature and the opposite of helpful. Why?

        • mortimer says

          Aug 12, 2015 at 10:17 am

          Agree with ECAW about defeatism. Nothing is inevitable. However! The brainwashing of youth by cultural Marxists has led to a general inability in the West to use critical thought to analyze political issues of IDEOLOGY. The Marxist ideology is so inculcated in Western youth that they are incapable of stepping outside it.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 12, 2015 at 11:59 pm

          I agree–this defeatism does not help.

          Let’s hope the Aussies reject this call for dhimmitude!

      • Diana says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 pm

        Well immigration really is not quite unabated “France is finished” – it has slowed down quite considerably because we turn back the boats and we also secretly chuck out those found to have lied about all sorts of stuff in their visa/residency applications. A crazy ex-friend of mine is actually a migration agent for some of them. And guess what that person calls me? Yup – I’m “the local fascist”apparently!

  2. Muhammad Bear says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 5:22 pm

    It seems like a perfectly rational argument to me.

    In order to blow up Australian shopping centers the Jihadi terrorist will have to leave the matrimonial home, a place of bliss and domestic harmony, thereby leaving their wives unchaperoned and free report the violence.

    • mortimer says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 11:21 am

      When their violent husbands prepare to blow up Australians, the Muslimahs are saying they will not report those men to the authorities, presumably because they fear honor-killing by their own husbands!

      These Muslim women are saying they are exempted from the duties of citizenship.

      • Muhammad Bear says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 1:09 pm

        Actually, they are arguing that they will not report domestic violence because the anti terror laws promote an environment of mistrust of authorities.

        Though the threat of piously motivated slaughter by an enraged spouse would likely be a greater deterrent.

  3. Angemon says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 5:25 pm

    Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence, according to the centre’s submission.

    What the f***? Hey, it’s muslim men beating their muslim wives because the quran says it’s ok. That does not count as “discrimination” or “racial violence”. In fact, your overuse of terms such as “discrimination” or “racism” as blunt tools to try to shame anyone whose stance you don’t like only serves to devalue them.

    • PJG says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 10:16 pm

      No, the “context” referred to is what they have to suffer from un non-Muslims, because you see we constantly attack them verbally and physically. Didn’t you know that? Life is one ghastly nightmare for them – violence in the home, school, street, workplace; they can’t even go out to buy the milk because as soon as they leave the house the “context” is out to get them, brutal and relentless.
      (See? They should have got me to help them write this stuff. I could have made it much more dramatic!)

  4. Angel Gabriel says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 5:38 pm

    If you don’t like it then get the F out and go to a Sharia country where I am sure you will be treated better because there are no “anti-terrorism laws”. I suggest ISIS occupied Syria — there are absolutely no anti-terrorism laws there.

    • abad says

      Aug 11, 2015 at 7:32 pm

      Precisely why Muslims do NOT fare well in western nations. They really do need to go back to their Muslim nations where they came from. They would be so much happier there.

  5. Martin Vink says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 7:08 pm

    There is only one act more suicidal for a woman than becoming a Muslim . . . marry a Muslim man! By doing either you are signing up for self abuse. You are condoning domestic violence. When you take it to Court your husband will pull out the Quran as his defence . . . and if you resist the Quran, then you have signed your death warrant. Why should your husband think otherwise? Why should Australian courts even bother with Islamic domestic violence. You understood what you are getting into. Be glad because in Britain women are simply raped without recourse and their voice is not heard either,

  6. Dan says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 7:13 pm

    If a Muslim women was assaulted by a strange man, (As is the case in just as many assaults and rapes as not) if her family were seriously practicing Muslims, what guarantee does she have a family member won’t kill her for being touched by a strange man?

    I just don’t get it.

    The feminists here, should be screaming to nuke at least half the male Muslim population.

    The extreme feminist’s silence is deafening, because they KNOW they can only practice their beliefs because the vast majority of men they accuse of being misogynists, ain’t.

    The only way I will give a rat’s patootie about an out there feminist’s opinions anymore, is if they start taking the same risks as Pamela Geller.

  7. abad says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 7:29 pm

    Why any female would want to be a Muslim is beyond me.

    • Peggy says

      Aug 11, 2015 at 9:28 pm

      The ones that actually want to marry a Muslim are very damaged. They need therapy rather than a Muslim wedding.

  8. Cecilia Ellis says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 8:11 pm

    “The organisation said in its submission Muslim women were “invisible” in the debate over family violence.”

    That is a very strange sentence . . . causes one to wonder if the word “submission” refers to papers prepared for a hearing or if the Muslim women, in their submission to male Muslims, were “invisible” in the debate over family violence. The latter is certainly true.

    • Diana says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 2:28 am

      Yes Cecilia : “The organisation said in its submission Muslim women were “invisible” in the debate over family violence.”
      Of course the hijab and the burqa have NOTHING whatsoever to do with making these poor unfortunate (deluded, brainwashed, submissive) women ïnvisible”do they? Couldn’t possibly be their faith in a false prophet (pbuh) and his self-evidently contradictory, peurile and evil ravings in the fascist handbook oops the quran.
      As a perfect example of a notorious lebanese Aussie muslim male’s attitude to women we need look no further than the “islamically enlightened” Bikal Skaf. For those not in Aus, he was the chief rapist in a gang along with his equally vile brother and a bunch of other thugs who systematically gang-raped a number of innocent Aussie girls. Of course the allegedly “thick sheik” his imam at Lakemba mosque said it was all the girls’ fault for dressing immodestly – at the beach! This nasty gang helped precipate the now imfamous Cronulla riots – for which – uou guessed it – the Maroubra surfies known as the “bra boys”were blamed!
      This piece of sh!t Bilal Skaf is now serving a very long sentence (eligible for parole in about 2033). But – boo hoo, sob sob, his ex-fiance dumped him and so he issued death threats to her and in his prison cell, guards found many drawings of her being raped. Well – according to his/his sick religion’s ways – it would have served her right no doubt.
      Australia will be saved by the so-called “boguns” and others seen as undesirable by certain elites. You will be delighted to know that the evil Bilal is now at a new jail, apparently in solitary confinement for his own protection after a plot by other prisoners to inject him with AIDS infected blood. Oh – the perfect irony. Fitting punishment hey!

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 3:04 am

        Diane, after your reading your comment, I immediately looked up the the Cronulla riots. Interestingly, the article reflected a lot of political correctness. You may find it interesting or perhaps, better said, disgusting.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Cronulla_riots

        Actually, it sounds a lot like Ferguson, Missouri. And yes, the article blames the Maroubra surfies.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Aug 12, 2015 at 3:07 am

          Diana, I apologize for misspelling your name. I was too incensed with the article I looked up and quickly responded. Again, thank you for the true information that you provided.

        • Diana says

          Aug 12, 2015 at 4:00 am

          Hey thanks Cecilia – yes DISGUSTING!
          But we here are preaching to the converted (read intelligent, aware and humane anti-fascists). So now how do we get the urgent message through to the politicians and those among us who are still asleep?

        • particolor says

          Aug 12, 2015 at 5:17 am

          What a coincidence ! It came up on tonight’s News ! 10 Year Anniversary ? Seems like Yesterday !!

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 5:14 am

        “So now how do we get the urgent message through to the politicians and those among us who are still asleep?”

        Diana, the good news is this: The Aussies are way out in front on this compared to other Western countries; the bad news is that the Aussies are way out in front on this compared to other Western countries. The majority of the people, not the 1% to 10% of the Muslims, in a Western country first should make their voices heard in the election process. Unfortunately, I believe this will happen only in response to a major attack. Sadly, such an attack could be precluded if politicians were more concerned about the internal and external threats to their nations’ security than they are about political correctness. But they are not alone.

        For example, the article, “Muslim women ‘made more vulnerable to violence by anti-terrorism laws,’” contains this sentence: “Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence, according to the centre’s submission.” Notice how there is no mention of how many cases of domestic violence were reported by Muslim women in Australia prior to the introduction of anti-terrorism laws.

        Additionally, notice how the article failed to address how many cases of domestic violence are reported by Muslim women — who survived — in Muslim-majority countries. I seriously doubt that these Muslim women dared to complain officially unless . . . unless their Muslim male family members coerced them to do so, specifically in order to profess the incessantly-chanted victimhood narrative. That the journalist failed to consider the validity of the Muslim women’s complaint is suspiciously political correctness. The news media enables this.

        Here’s another great line: “Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence, according to the centre’s submission.” This is absurd! The only religious violence that occurs is that which erupts from the hands of Muslims. Notice how the journalist made no mention of any verifiable incidences or made no mention of a history of religious violence coming from other religions.

        In short, both the Muslim women’s complaint and the news article reporting that complaint are red herrings. In essence, the media is as culpable as are politicians. So, to answer your question, it is an educate-one-person-at-a-time process for a time. A Marine General once said: “Do as much as you can, for as many as you can, for as long as you can.” While I regrettably do not recall his name, I shook his hand and told him that I would never forget his words. I have not. That seems like pretty good advice. Don’t know if that answers your question, but it’s all I can offer at the moment.

  9. No Fear says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 9:43 pm

    This is simply another way of muslims telling the kuffar police to submit to Islam and stop enforcing “Islamophobic” anti-terrorist laws. Nothing surprises me with Islam anymore.
    It is ALWAYS about non-muslims submitting to Islam. ALWAYS.
    This news item is another example.

  10. Baucent says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 10:50 pm

    “Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence, according to the centre’s submission.”

    So what they are saying is discrimination and religious violence against muslims in Australia is causing muslim men to beat their wives?

    Excuse me, that is a bulls–t cop out. Where is the evidence of “daily discrimination and religiously inspired violence” against muslims? In fact Australians by in large are a very accepting and generous people, a diverse nation built on immigration. But where there have been terror plots and incidents it has been always muslims who are behind it. That uncomfortable fact is the cause for increased suspicion and scrutiny their community now face. And as for wife beating? muslims have always done that.

  11. sidney penny says

    Aug 11, 2015 at 11:33 pm

    “contact authorities for protection”

    There are different authorities one can contact in the West for domestic violence.

    There are authorities that are family law groups that have nothing to do with authorities associated with preventing terrorism or in charge of national security.

    So the Australian Muslim Women’s Centre for Human Rights.are just making excuses. or as Robert puts it , using “anti-terror laws as a scapegoat.”

  12. Matthieu Baudin says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 12:20 am

    Looks like another ‘Women For Jihad’ outfit. If they wish to live like slaves and put up with ingrained misogynist cruelty, then kind countries like Australia probably aren’t suited to their tastes.

    • particolor says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 12:58 am

      Muslima’s with two Black Eyes need not Apply ! 🙁

  13. Georg says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 2:06 am

    It’s a pound of bricks or a pound of feathers. If the police arrive, the husband cries Islamophobia. If the police refrain, the wife cries Islmophobia. Solution? Push the pieces off the board.

    • particolor says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 3:14 am

      The Ambulance Men said She may or may not have had 2 Black eyes ? It was hard to tell as they were only allowed to look at Her through the letterbox Slit ? 🙁 And the husband was jumping around protesting like an Ape with His Banana Stolen !! 🙁

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 3:16 am

        Another winner, Particolor!

      • Steven says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 7:56 am

        Particolor…..Spot on, mate!

  14. Nimrod says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 3:19 am

    Muslim women are invisible in the discussion? Well, maybe that’s because oppressive Islam makes women invisible in society period.

    Has it occurred to these idiots that Muslim men might beat the women for participating in such a discussion?

    This doesn’t sound like an organization that cares what happens to women, but rather an organization dedicated to pushing socialist class warfare objectives while ignoring individual rights. I mean, to care about individual rights you’d have to stop making excuses for groups of people based on stupid Marxist class warfare theories, but that’s not what’s going on here.

    • particolor says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 3:27 am

      These Ostriches We’ve got here will get a Shock at the next Election ! Not like England that Voted for More Of The Same !! 🙁

    • Diana says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 4:06 am

      No sorry Nimrod – islamists are not socialists (left wingers) – they are fascists (extreme right wingers). It’s sad that the PC lefties stand up for their “rights” without ever understanding that they are diametrically opposed ideologically – or they jolly well should be!
      So how do you propose we stop this pre-nazi fascist assault on our freedom pray tell?

      • ECAW says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 5:41 am

        Diana – I beg to differ. One spectrum from far left to far right doesn’t do justice to the complexity of the situation.

        Think of the “Socialism” in “National Socialism”. On the other hand do the leftist “anti-fascists” not remind you of the 30’s Brownshirts who closed down debate with intimidation and violence.

        One way of looking at it is to think of that spectrum as a circle with the far right and far left meeting each other round the back out of sight.

        Another way is to superimpose a vertical axis of authoritarianism to allow for the “fascist left” as well as the “fascist right”, as shown here:

        http://www.politicalcompass.org/

  15. Cecilia Ellis says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 3:26 am

    Exactly!

  16. medaber_emet says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 3:27 am

    this is ridiculous
    as if without anti terror laws they would have report domestic violence?
    we all know very well that the muslim woman is a property of the husband and he can beat her as much as he like and even kill her if he feel that she is disobedient because its his right according to Islamic sharia
    we are too smart to let the islamoc bastards fool us

    • Cecilia Elllis says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 3:58 am

      You almost have to wonder, just how many Muslim women reported domestic violence prior to the introduction of anti-terrorism laws? And how on earth do anti-terrorism laws relate to domestic violence within a family?

      “Domestic violence against Muslim women happened in a context of daily discrimination and racial and religious violence.”

      What a disgusting lie! Daily context of discrimination? Racial and religious violence? The only religious violence I have heard of is that which incessantly erupts at Muslim hands with every perceived opportunity to chant a duplicitous narrative of victimhood. This cancer is metastasizing throughout Western cultures. Just how many cases of domestic violence are reported by Muslim women in . . . let’s say . . . Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Saudi Arabia or any of the Muslim majority nations? I almost believe that the Muslim men sent their objects (Muslim women) to complain to the organization. Another red herring.

  17. DP111 says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 5:25 am

    In related matters

    1. Apostates to Islam complain that anti-terror laws make them afraid to leave Islam.

    2. Muslim women complain that anti-terror laws make them afraid to report the practice of FGM and honour killings.

  18. duh_swami says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 6:00 am

    Everyone knows that women are obsessed with sex, and the only way to control their lust is to keep them covered up, semi-confined, and beaten when necessary. Allah was very wise when it had Gabriel drop 4:34 on Mahound, 24″2 is also good…When they are ‘uncovered meat’, they are tempters if men. The last thing the pious want to do is be tempted…Unless it is by a slave girl, or a captive of a kuffar woman from the bar, then temptation is just fine….especially if you shout Allahu Akbar, while working it out…

    • jayell says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 6:29 am

      “Everyone knows that women are obsessed with sex”…….

      Seems a bit of a gross generalisation. Only an idiot would deny that women are motivated by sex to some degree or other, and only an idiot would seriously try to deny that men aren’t pretty well exactly the same. Two sides of the same coin. One just has to use one’s powers of observation to deduce this, assuming that these are finctioning properly.

      I am quite fascinated by psychology, and in particular in the common phenomenom of ‘projection’ in cases of people who for some reason have impaired intellectual function. In this case, it seems to be a case of projected sexual incontinence, whereby, as a justification for one’s amorality and irresponibility, one apportions blame onto the object of one’s obsession whilst denying the true root of the problem – oneself. It would appear that the intellectual impairment here originates in islamic dogma (“Allah was very wise when it had Gabriel drop 4:34 on Mahound, 24″2 is also good…When they are ‘uncovered meat’, they are tempters if men”). How else does one explain the appallingly protracted and on-going depravity involving muslim men in places such as Rotherham in the UK?

      • jayell says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 6:37 am

        Sorry, should have added the obvious. Following the same thesis, the quote….

        “Allah was very wise when it had Gabriel drop 4:34 on Mahound, 24″2 is also good…When they are ‘uncovered meat’, they are tempters if men”…..

        could be taken to suggest the ‘Allah’ himself (note the gender) is a projection of this somewhat unsatisfactory and depraved mentality.

    • G P says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 5:42 pm

      How could islamic women be obsessed by sex? A lot of them have been genitally mutilated.

      As for any non-muslim women desiring sex from a muslim man, you’ve got to be joking ROFL! What sane, educated woman would want a smelly, crotch-lice infested muslim male who thinks it’s OK to visit some cruelty on a woman if the desire overcomes him?

      Face it mate, women with even half a brain would find you vomit inducing, go back to your ass lifting.

      • PJG says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 10:26 pm

        Evidently you are unfamiliar with duh_swami’s unique sense of humour.

    • abad says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 6:05 pm

      “Everyone knows that women are obsessed with sex,”

      Well the same could be said for men. But understanding your sarcasm, I’d go one step further and say all Muslim men are obssesed with having sex with goats.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 13, 2015 at 12:08 am

        Jayell, G P, and Abad, Duh Swami meant that *Islam* says women are obsessed with sex–which is why pious Muslims cut off girl’s clitorises.

  19. jayell says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 6:06 am

    “Muslim women complain that anti-terror laws make them too frightened to report domestic violence”….

    Doesn’t make sense. Domestic violence is a private problem. Terrorism is a public problem. If you have any real sense of public duty, the former should not impinge on the latter. I suppose ‘if’ is the important word there.

    • Diana says

      Aug 12, 2015 at 9:30 am

      no actually Jayell, I think domestic violence is a serious social problem. It is assault full stop. And given that it’s endemic in iskam – (oops that was actually a genuine typo but now I see just how apt that typo really is given that it [islam] is an almighty scam) – it needs to be addressed.
      You’d think, if they really gave a toss about this serious problem that the Muslim Women’s assoc would be speaking out about it and militating to change their precious alleged religion. But no – it’s all us rotten kaffirs’fault for not letting these poor victims to speak out. Logically unsustainable right. But then so is the whole scam of islam.

      • jayell says

        Aug 12, 2015 at 6:21 pm

        Yes it is a serious social problem, but an act of domestic violence is essentially a piece of private nastiness and is never going to result in dozens of people getting maimed or blown to pieces. That’s the difference in the public/private dimension.

  20. mortimer says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 10:50 am

    The complaint in effect means that Muslim women in Australia do not wish to report terrorism to the Australian authorities and that means they have no intention of defending the sovereignty of Australia against terrorists.

    The Muslim women who make this complaint wish to stand opposite the interests of Australians…so…the conclusion is…if you will not defend Australia…in any way…IN WHAT WAY ARE YOU AN ‘AUSTRALIAN’? Moreover, if you will not defend Australia…why should you remain in Australia? Would you not be better off in a country where your beliefs are part of the constitution?

  21. rcourtemanche says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 12:59 pm

    “…too frightened to report domestic violence” BS. Another soft tactic (lie) to support their evil agenda and get the support of lame politicians.

  22. K. Serra says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 1:46 pm

    If muslims don’t like laws in the countries that they have immigrated to, they have a choice-they can go home! In fact, do us all a favor and do just that-GO HOME! Do not come into our countries and expect to turn us all upside down and backwards for you people. You come to our countries and YOU conform to OUR ways, not the other way around!

  23. Angemon says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 4:09 pm

    The organisation said in its submission Muslim women were “invisible” in the debate over family violence.

    In all fairness, they do dress like ninjas…

  24. Mike Holt (CEO RestoreAustralia) says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 5:31 pm

    Yawn! More victimhood. If these idiotic women don’t want to get beaten up by their moronic sub-human husbands they can Leave Islam or Leave Australia (LILA).

    We Aussies are over islam….it’s time to rid our nation of the ideology of rape, murder, misogyny, idiocy.

  25. gravenimage says

    Aug 12, 2015 at 11:57 pm

    Australia: Muslim women complain that anti-terror laws make them too frightened to report domestic violence

    This bizarre bid for the ever-coveted victimhood status is based on the proposition that Australia’s anti-terror laws are “Islamophobic,” you see, and thus make Muslim women distrustful of Australian authorities, to the extent that they will not hurry to them to turn in their Muslim husbands for domestic abuse. This is absurd on several levels…
    …………………………..

    It sure is. How cynical are Muslims to use their own propensity for abusing women as a cudgel to use against the Infidels to get us to back off on even the minimal defense against violent Jihad we are engaging in now?

    Another point of cynicism–clearly, they hope we care about Muslim women a lot more than Muslims do. Wifebeating is a canonical part of Islam.

    More:

    Muslim women who had experienced racial violence in public, such as being insulted or having their religious garments forcibly removed, were even less likely to ask for help if they were being abused at home, the centre said.
    …………………………..

    How sick is this? They are pairing illusory “Islamophobia” with actual Muslim domestic abuse of women.

    I would say that Muslims have no shame, but we already knew that…

  26. Wayne Bea says

    Aug 29, 2015 at 11:19 pm

    What you all need to know. And this is over and above my article. Womens UN Human rights has Sharia law as it’s convention. Look up Cairo declaration for human rights in Islam, it is Sharia law.

    A DECLARATION OF WAR?

    Recently 56
    Islamic countries & Palestine got together and decided to change
    Shariah law to Abrogate Christianity & Judaism as religions. This gives
    Muslims legal permission to Rape, kill enslave Christians & Jews as they have relegated us all to infidels.

    ALL ISLAMIC SECTS AGREED. ON THIS MATTER THERE IS NO DISAGREEMENT

    [Please don’t be confused with common atrocities against Christians & Jews. Jews & Christians were killed in accordance with Shariah for breaking Shariah law. Example trumped up Koran damage or drinking from the wrong well, offending Mohammad etc. They would usually legalise it.

    It has always been illegal until this change to kill a believer of the same Abrahamic god unless Sharia law was broken..

    The terms Infidel and Kafir are for NON-believers of the Abrahamic god. Examples Buddhists, Atheists, Hindus, etc]

    Proof: You can find it in the manual for Islamic law (shariah) called the ‘Reliance of the traveler”. The de facto point of reference for Clerics & Muslims on Shariah law.

    Reliance of the traveler

    Says:
    Previously revealed religions were valid in their own eras, but were abrogated by the universal message of Islam.
    It goes on to say the book is written in English so that there can be no mistranslation of the message and that..

    it is unbelief (Kufr) to hold remnant cults now bearing the names of formerly valid religions, such as “Christianity” or Judaism,” are acceptable to Allah Most High after he sent the final Messenger (Sic)

    It ends with..
    This is a matter over which there is no disagreement among Islamic Scholars (sic) THEY’VE ALL AGREED LEGALLY

    This is a scholarly consensus known as ijma that says..
    the ruling agreed upon is an authoritative part of Sacred Law that is obligatory to obey and not lawful to disobey (sic)
    Blah blah blah
    Can’t ever be changed..
    because the ruling on it, verified by scholarly consensus, is an absolute legal ruling which does not’ admit of being contravened or annulled. (sic)

    It also goes on to say that any Muslims who discuss or consider (think) about the subject are to be apostatized and heads removed. This means they can’t speak about it but also it handicaps them as they can’t lie either because lying takes consideration. So if you seek other proof ask a few Muslims.

    Please copy and share with as many people as you can

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.