• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Islamic State murders 19 girls for refusing sex with jihadis, peddles sex slaves like “barrels of petrol”

Aug 6, 2015 1:08 pm By Robert Spencer

purported photo of captured girls Islamic StateThe seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.

“ISIS executes 19 girls for refusing to have sex with fighters as UN envoy reveals how sex slaves are ‘peddled like barrels of petrol,'” by Jay Akbar, Mailonline, August 6, 2015:

ISIS fanatics have executed 19 women for refusing to have sex with its fighters, a Kurdish official has said.

He claimed the women were being held hostage in Islamic State’s stronghold of Mosul, Iraq, which the terror group seized in June last year.

Meanwhile a UN envoy investigating Islamic State’s vile sex trade has said ‘girls get peddled like barrels of petrol’ and one can be bought by six different men.

She also verified a disturbing ISIS document which suggested the extremists sell the Yazidi and Christian women and children they have abducted, with girls aged just one to nine-years-old fetching the most money.

ISIS stormed the Sinjar district in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community, who the Islamists view as heretics.

It is not known whether the 19 women executed – supposedly just a few days ago – were Yazidis or not.

They were put to death because they refused to ‘participate in the practice of sexual jihad,’ a spokesman for the Kurdish Democratic Party in Mosul told Iraqi News.

Said Mimousini also claimed issues around money and the distribution of women have caused a rift within ISIS’s ranks.

In October, the terror group released a pamphlet which showed how much it charged for the purchase of its female captives.

A translated version of the document (left) was shared online by humanitarian and peace prize winner Dr Widad Akrawi, and reads as follows:

We have received news that the demand in Women and Cattle market has sharply decreased and that will affect Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield, therefore we have made some changes. Below are the prices for Yazidi and Christian women.

The price for Yazidi or Christian women between the age of 40 – 50 is $43 (£27)

$75 (48) for 30 to 40-year-olds

$86 (£55) for 20 to 30-year-olds

$130 (£83) for ten to 20-year-olds

$172 (£110) for one to nine-year-olds

Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries. 

Dated and sealed by ISIS in Iraq October 16, 2014.

Its authenticity was debated until April, when the UN’s special envoy for sexual violence in conflict confirmed it was genuine during a trip to Iraq.

Zainab Bangura told Bloomberg: ‘The girls get peddled like barrels of petrol… One girl can be sold and bought by five or six different men.

‘Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom.’

The shocking document described the women it abducted as ‘items’ and claimed a decrease in demand of ‘women and cattle’ affected ‘Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield’.

It then gives the prices of women and children by age, with one to nine-year-olds costing the most – around £110. The older the women, the lower the price.

The pamphlet – published on October 16 – goes on to say: ‘Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries.

Bangura said the fighters get to choose first and then ‘wealthy Middle-Easterners are allowed to

The UN envoy has previously said the best looking Yazidi virgins are sent to depraved slave auctions in Islamic State’s adopted capital of Raqqa in Syria, where they are stripped naked and sold to the highest bidder.

They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women… They have a price list

She said Islamic State, which controls over four million people living inside its territory in Iraq and Syria, is unlike any other terror group.

Bangura added: ‘They [ISIS] have a machinery… They have a manual on how you treat these women. They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women… They have a price list.’

An ISIS video released in November last year appeared to show an ISIS ‘sex slave market’ where fighters can choose among different Yazidi girls who are priced according to ‘desirable’ physical features.

Since then, several women who managed to escape their abusive captors have told of the pain and suffering they endured under ISIS rule.

Only last month, three Yazidi women who were forced to become jihadi said they were raped ‘five times a day’ after being traded as human cargo.

The young women – Bushra, 21, Munira, 17, and Noor, 22 – were tied up, gang raped and burnt with cigarettes after being forced to marry ISIS fighters. Their names have been changed to protect their identity.

After escaping Iraq, the women were flown to the UK by international charity AMAR, which helps people rebuild their lives following conflict.

Bushra, who tried to kill herself when she was sold to an ISIS extremist, said: ‘The man who had bought me took me to hospital.

He raped me about five times a day… My sister was barely 14 when they raped her… I could hear her screaming but I couldn’t do anything as I was tied up
Bushra, former Yazidi sex slave

‘He told me he was going to rape me that same day, however ill I made myself. He took me home, tied up my hands and feet, and raped me.

‘He raped me about five times a day. My sister was barely 14 when they raped her… I could hear her screaming but I couldn’t do anything as I was tied up.’

Thousands of women and girls from the Yazidi community – an ancient Kurdish ethnic group based in the north of Iraq – have had their lives shattered by ISIS fighters, Amnesty International has said.

The organisation says hundreds, and possibly thousands, have been forced to marry, ‘sold’ or given as ‘gifts’ to Islamic State fighters or their supporters – and many held as sexual slaves are girls younger than 14….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Islamic supremacism, Sharia, slavery, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: sex slaves, Yazidis


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. ich says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    yet the world sits silent

    shame on us all

    • nicu says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 2:13 pm

      So true – it still seems that crimes on women and children don’t matter 🙁

      • Shane says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 3:52 pm

        To liberals, the war on women is Republicans who don’t want to provide free birth control and abortions to young women, not Islamic jihadists who rape, beat, and force women and girls to marry jihadis. Sick liberals!

    • Huck Folder says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 9:33 pm

      Especially the likes of so-called ‘feminists like Sunera Thobani in Canada,
      a stain on the University of British Columbia.

    • Lee says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 11:36 pm

      Yes ‘ich’, although better said that “the elites of the world stay silent”. If Islam or the Islamic State were ever exposed on national TV, Islam would be finished by the mass of ordinary decent people loudly DEMANDING it. Unfortunately “journalists” and most politicians conspire to protect Islam and its State from exposure.

      Nonetheless, consider that here in Australia a poll was taken for the ABC (our national broadcaster) in June on *stripping citizenship* from Jihadis AND their supporters, and deporting them all.

      The pollsters found (much to their chagrin) that voters of ALL parties overwhelmingly SUPPORTED stripping citizenship, and kicking Jihadis and their supporters OUT.

      The figures were Lib/Nat (roughly equiv Republican) 93% out, vs 2% against (rest undecided),
      Labor Party (roughly equiv to Democrats) 77% out, 11% against,
      and Greens (mostly hard left/communist) 52% out, 35% against.
      (Other small parties combined, 84% out, 10% against.) See http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-10/lewis-woods-the-citizenship-plan-was-a-populist-pitch/6535372

      Goes to show that despite 14 years of pro-Islamist promotion and protection from journalists and politicians, the masses still recognize a group at war with us, and know what needs to be done about them. And we are starting to get politicians willing to enact the voters’ wishes.

      I’d love to see a similar poll of Americans and people of other nations. Don’t give up on humanity yet – just try to spread the word about Islamic fascism.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 2:39 pm

        Good news from Down Under, Lee.

        Glad to see that even with the hard leftists Greens that a majority want to see Jihadists deported, and that with the other parties such support is much higher.

        • Lee says

          Aug 8, 2015 at 2:01 am

          Thanks for your positivity GI. Yes it was a real eye-opener. Journalists here pretend on the issue of Islamofascism there’s the “far-right-wing” who don’t like it, vs. the rest of us who supposedly side with the Journalist-Muslim Alliance. The poll exposed this as another enormous manipulative lie from Australian journalists.

          I would guess it’s similar in other civilized nations – e.g. I can’t believe the vast majority of ordinary Americans or British are less patriotic than we are, or don’t mind Muslims’ Jihad against their civilizations.

          The lesson I take from the poll is that non-Muslims of civilized countries should be careful about distrusting each other along political-party lines as journalists want us to do – when the hidden fact is the vast majority of us agree with each other about deporting violent Muslims and all their supporters from our countries, permanently.

          (And imagine the vehemency of opposition to Islam if it were actually exposed – in the way Jihad Watch does – on national TV.)

          Once the first Muslim is stripped of citizenship and deported, that’s the thin edge of the wedge inserted. We Aussies will push the rest out the door, as none can renounce Muhammad’s Jihad against us, and almost all are either born overseas, or have parents/grandparents who were.

          (The proposed citizenship-stripping law is for terrorists, terror suspects, and any supporters, who hold dual citizenship with a foreign country, or those with sole Australian citizenship who can access foreign citizenship through their parents or grandparents).

      • Angemon says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 7:37 am

        Lee posted:

        “and Greens (mostly hard left/communist)”

        As the saying goes: “they call themselves Green because they’re too yellow to admit they’re Red”.

  2. miriamrove says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    Savages!!! M

  3. Angemon says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 2:07 pm

    Sickening stuff, and shame on the people who ignore these stories for things such as “‘Islamophobia’ at 30000 feet” or “Can Zimbabwe have lion’s killer extradited?”

  4. Charli Main says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 2:32 pm

    But—-but—-but—Western feminist organisations never fail to prattle on about how liberated muslim women are and its their right to dress in garbage bags and have their clitorises hacked off. Yes—-very liberating !!!!!

    • Angemon says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 2:41 pm

      You know feminists – they’re too busy demanding special treatment and crying “rape” to notice actual rapes taking place…

      • miriamrove says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 2:51 pm

        Free inhabitant!! What a pos!!! M

  5. Rob Crawford says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 3:35 pm

    So Muslim men know a woman wouldn’t willingly have sex with them. Apparently Mohammed knew it, too.

    • mortimer says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 4:08 pm

      Rape is normative Islam…just don’t do it to Muslim.

      What a criminal religion.

      • Falsafa says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 4:20 pm

        absurd…you must have your own religion confused with ours…keep deluding yourselves! ignorance breeds fear and you lot reek of fear!

        • Champ says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 4:31 pm

          “Falsafa” is wasting his precious time here. He needs to march on over to Iraq and set ISIS straight!! But I recommend a one-way ticket “Falsafa” …

          Oh, what’s the matter “Falsafa” afraid of getting your head cut off? Yeah, but at least “Falsafa” took aim at the real enemy.

        • Angemon says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 4:39 pm

          Alfalfa posted:

          “absurd…you must have your own religion confused with ours…”

          No, the muslims in the islamic state go out of their way to make sure we know that whatever it is they do, they do it by strictly applying islamic tenets.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 6:57 pm

          The repulsive falsafa wrote, replying to Mortimer:

          Rape is normative Islam…just don’t do it to Muslim.

          What a criminal religion.
          …

          absurd…you must have your own religion confused with ours…keep deluding yourselves! ignorance breeds fear and you lot reek of fear!
          ……………………….

          What absolute crap. This is an article about pious Muslims practicing rape and sex slavery. Judaism and Christianity do not allow such barbarism–but Islam actually sacralizes it.

          The baleful “Prophet” of Islam was a rapist and taker of sex slaves, and the Qur’an and Hadith laud such atrocities as completely Islamic.

          And note that falsafa is not arguing with his devout coreligionists in ISIS to tell then how wrong they are–instead, he is trying to spread his ham-fisted Taqiyya to the good Infidels of Jihad Watch.

        • Huck Folder says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 9:37 pm

          @ gravenimage

          “The Baalful “prophet” of Islam”

        • Joseph says

          Aug 7, 2015 at 12:21 am

          @ Falsafa
          absurd…you must have your own religion confused with ours…keep deluding yourselves! ignorance breeds fear and you lot reek of fear!
          _____________________________________

          I can bet with 100% certainty that you would not send over any of your sisters, daughters, aunts or cousins over to *service* these jihadists so that they would not resort to these crimes not allowed by your “religion?”.
          So Falsafa why don’t you do it? It would be for the cause of Islam and it would please your Allah so much to have your female loved ones raped repeatedly by these unclean vermin.
          What is the matter? Because it is someone you know and love that it now becomes objectionable?

          FALSAFA…YOU ARE A PIG OF THE LOWEST ORDER.

        • t. says

          Aug 7, 2015 at 12:47 am

          Falsafa,

          You always have an answer, no matter how stupid and sh*t it is!

          As your identity is fused with that of Islam, defending it, at any cost, is a matter of life or death to you!!

          It’s not a game of words, all the facts are there for those who are sincere in their search for the truth and love for the creator.

          I challenge you to grow up, be a man and face the truth. Study the Quran, Hadiths and Sunnah, then compare them to the teachings of Christianity, for example. Study about the beginnings of Islam, how it was spread and compare it with that of Christianity. Look for nothing but the truth, the whole of it. Difficult work but its reward is great.

          Do this before posting any further comments on the subject of your religion. If you’re not willing to do this hard work, digging for the truth, as explained above, then you’re simply a hypocrite, coward and lazy m*ther f*cker!

        • Jay Boo says

          Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 am

          Obama would dare not condemn this behavior because he believes It is wrong to slander the ‘prophet’ of Islam and those who follow Muhammad’s shameless example.

          Muhammad promised a 72 pre-pubescent sex-slave child virgin Paradise????
          Yeah right.
          What a vile pig.

  6. Shmooviyet says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 3:36 pm

    A woman or child ( a one-year-old is a “girl” in this sense?? ) being referred to as “items for sale” to “customers”.
    And the UN/OIC is business as usual.
    Where is Mrs.O. with a new hashtag?

    • Lee says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 2:16 am

      Great point. Though in Mrs.O’s defense, she first wants to make sure the infants are in hijab – priorities you know…

  7. Falsada says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    this aberration called isil is a direct product of the US invasion on iraq so dont go making up stories that this is sanctioned chapter and verse in scripture…

    • Champ says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 pm

      “False-yada” denies the TRUTH about ISLAM aka ISIS, and instead pushes this tiresome propaganda …and methinks he’s never read the quran. What a boring yahoo.

    • Huck Folder says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 9:39 pm

      Just read what their leaders say.
      And they have more knowledge of islam
      than you will EVER have.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 2:00 am

      Thanks for the info, Falsada
      I did not know that US invasion on Iraq has been going on for the past 1400 years.

  8. Falsafa says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:12 pm

    this aberration called isil is a direct product of the US invasion of iraq so dont go making up stories that this is sanctioned chapter and verse in scripture…you would be well advised in dealing with your own domestic criminality, police abuse etc in your own country…my dear “compassionate (especially towards muslims)” blog commentators!

    • Angemon says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 4:38 pm

      Alfalfa posted:

      “this aberration called isil is a direct product of the US invasion of iraq”

      No, it’s the product of direct application of islamic tenets, no matter how much you wish to pretend otherwise.

      • Falsafa says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 4:54 pm

        …says the anti muslim bigot! you are barking up the “orientalist” tree dear Ange-useless-mon…read some Edward Said and that should partly set you a little straight…

        • Champ says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:07 pm

          “anti muslim bigot”

          More false nonsense from “False-yada” who’s using the typical buzzwords irregardless of whether or not they’re in fact true (of course they are not) …and who wouldn’t know the TRUTH about islam & company if it bit him in the rear-end.

          What’s the matter “False-yada”, is the ugly TRUTH about islam too hot for you to handle? Apparently.

        • Angemon says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:08 pm

          Alfalfa posted:

          “…says the anti muslim bigot!”

          No refutation of what I said, just an accusation of bigotry. You don’t dabble in facts – got it.

          “read some Edward Said and that should partly set you a little straight”

          Who better to teach about islam than a biased sloppy, amateur, insult flinging, obfuscating liar, right? No, thanks, I’ll stick to the source material – the quran, ahadith, the biography of muhammad and their commentaries.

        • Falsafa says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:47 pm

          yes… twisting the source material to suit your hate filled agenda…you lot seem to make stuff up and then feed yourselves into a frenzy of hate until you believe it’s true… then you write on these blogs supporting each others comments and I guess that’s how you feel you are making a positive contibution to a nonsensical discourse which you conjured up! Pitiful really…

        • Angemon says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 6:32 pm

          Alfalfa posted:

          “yes… twisting the source material to suit your hate filled agenda…you lot seem to make stuff up and then feed yourselves into a frenzy of hate until you believe it’s true…”

          No, that’s what muhammad did to Jewish and Christian sources – he retconned all biblical figures into muslim prophets and used them to justify his thirst for blood and booty. Mostly booty, and under-aged one at that.

        • Champ says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 6:21 pm

          “False-yada” wrote:

          “…twisting the source material to suit your hate filled agenda…you lot seem to make stuff up and then feed yourselves into a frenzy of hate until you believe it’s true…”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          These remarks are rather amusing when you consider the source; and one might think that he was gazing in a mirror when he wrote that comment. Oh, the irony.

        • Champ says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 6:36 pm

          “False-yada” wrote:

          “…then you write on these blogs supporting each others comments and I guess that’s how you feel you are making a positive contibution …”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Well, at least *we* are a harmless bunch of JW contributors — compared to those with a “hate filled agenda” whom actually work themselves into a “frenzy of hate” and take to the streets en masse!

          Of whom am I referring to, pray tell? Yep!

          Again, such irony …

      • Falsafa says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 6:52 pm

        yeah Chump who are you referring to? another bogus make believe figment of your warped imagination perhaps in order to make yourself feel usefull by creating these bogus “savages” which you and your supported have to oppose at all costs and support the Spencer “anti Jihad” movement again to feel that you have a purpose in life? Is that it Chump?

        • Huck Folder says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 9:45 pm

          Falstaff:

          You are calling al-Baghdadi “a bogus make believe figment of your warped imagination”?

          I think some of his men might come looking for you

      • Shmooviyet says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 1:19 pm

        @Angemon: “Alfalfa” LOLOL. Picturing a cowlick and a bow-tie. Thanks for the laugh amidst Falsyada’s hooey.

    • Isabella says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 7:04 pm

      The problem with Islam followers is that it’s never their fault, it’s always someone else’s fault. You disgust me.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 8:50 pm

      Falsafa wrote:

      this aberration called isil is a direct product of the US invasion of iraq so dont go making up stories that this is sanctioned chapter and verse in scripture…
      ……………………………………….

      What absolute rot. Boko Haram has kidnapped Christian girls to use as sex slaves–did the US invade Nigeria? Sudanese Muslims have been enslaving Christian and animist girls–did the US invade Sudan?

      And before that, the Ottomans used Christian girls to stock its slave markets and Harems for hundreds of years–and yet, the US never invaded Anatolia. And what about the baleful founder of Islam? He raped Infidels and took sex slaves over a thousand years before the US even existed.

      He also doesn’t explain why it is that ISIS is justifying this savagery on the texts and tenets of Islam, and the vicious model of the “Prophet”–certainly, it is not civilized Americans who practice sex slavery.

      More, to Angemon:

      …says the anti muslim bigot! you are barking up the “orientalist” tree dear Ange-useless-mon…
      ……………………………………….

      How is citing Islamic scripture “Orientalist”? Surely Falsafa himself is not rejecting Islamic scripture? That would make him an apostate, and as subject to execution as the poor girls in the story above.

      If Angemon and Champ were *lauding* such savagery, I’m sure Falsafa wouldn’t accuse them of ‘anti muslim bigotry’.

      More:

      yes… twisting the source material to suit your hate filled agenda…you lot seem to make stuff up and then feed yourselves into a frenzy of hate until you believe it’s true… then you write on these blogs supporting each others comments and I guess that’s how you feel you are making a positive contibution to a nonsensical discourse which you conjured up! Pitiful really…
      ……………………………………….

      Note that Falsafa does not explain why it is that it is not us ‘anti muslim bigots’ who are engaging in such barbarism, but instead his own devout coreligionists. How is this possible if it is all made up by us ‘Islamophobes’?

      And yes, we *do* feel we are making a “contibution” (sic) standing against rape, sex slavery, and murder. No doubt Falsafa feels he is making a “contibution” to the spread of Islam whitewashing such atrocities.

      More:

      Falsafa wrote:

      yeah Chump (sic) who are you referring to? another bogus make believe figment of your warped imagination perhaps in order to make yourself feel usefull (sic) by creating these bogus “savages” which you and your supported have to oppose at all costs and support the Spencer “anti Jihad” movement again to feel that you have a purpose in life? Is that it Chump (sic) ?
      ……………………………………….

      The idea that this was made up by Robert Spencer is utterly false–and so easily refuted. The byline is the Daily Mail–is Falsafa ignorant of what that is? It is a major newspaper. The fact is that *all* of the stories covered at Jihad Watch use mainstream news sources.

      The fact is that having Islamic savagery exposed for what it is is quite inconvenient for Muslims like Falsafa, so they try to pretend it does not exist.

      Of course, this whitewash is only necessary for now–when Muslims are in full control, as ISIS is in the Islamic State, the need for Taqiyya is past, and the mask can come off.

      And if you want to see what Islam looks like without the mask, one need look no further than the sanguinary Islamic State.

  9. mortimer says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:12 pm

    Abusing women is normative Islam. Mohammed said women are the prisoners of men and their ‘domestic animals’.

    • Stephanie says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 4:17 pm

      Women_BEATER#1 allah is definitely not a woman’s best friend

      “… then beat them” Q4:34

      2:228 “… but men have a degree (of advantage) OVER them (women)”

      Islam is a pervert men club

      • Falsafa says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 4:24 pm

        again total nonsense…stop confusing your christianity with other religions…a sick twisted agenda you must have…

        • voegelinian says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 4:32 pm

          Well look who wandered into the Counter-Jihad… Must have gotten lost, took the wrong turn down the wrong hallway, looking for the Muslim-Only rest room where following the Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder of Muhammad, one must enter with the left foot first…

          Falsafa must think we fell off the falafel truck yesterday. His (or her) Taqiyya/Daw’a Tu Quque Two-Step is so 2005…

        • Angemon says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 4:36 pm

          Alfalfa, the sources are up there for everyone to see. You should know by now that tu-quoquery gets you no traction here.

        • Falsafa says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:02 pm

          Stephanie…seriously! you’re giving me this as a source…a self serving anti muslim site…why is it that you non muslms thinks that you know better that the those of us in the faith? What is your beef with us really dont understand…are you trying to spread Christianity at all costs? or do you hate middle easter types really? would be a nightmare to have you as my neighbour for sure!

          read some credible scholarship of Islam with adequate Tefsir…not this self serving drivel you put in front of me!

        • Angemon says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:34 pm

          Alfalfa posted:

          “why is it that you non muslms thinks that you know better that the those of us in the faith?

          (…)

          read some credible scholarship of Islam with adequate Tefsir…not this self serving drivel you put in front of me!”

          This coming from the person saying I needed to read Edward Said after I pointed out that the islamic state is basing all their actions on islamic tenets… You don’t owe a lot to the goddess of consistency, do you?

        • voegelinian says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:37 pm

          Falsafa wrote:

          “you’re giving me this as a source…a self serving anti muslim site”

          How about Ibn Kathir’s tafsir? —

          Quoting the Koran at 4.34 —

          “(34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are Qanitat, and guard in the husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard. As to those women on whose part you see ill conduct, admonish them, and abandon them in their beds, and beat them, but if they return to obedience, do not seek a means against them…”

          — Ibn Kathir goes on to explain:

          “(As to those women on whose part you see ill conduct,) meaning, the woman from whom you see ill conduct with her husband, such as when she acts as if she is above her husband, disobeys him, ignores him, dislikes him, and so forth. When these signs appear in a woman, her husband should advise her and remind her of Allah’s torment if she disobeys him. Indeed, Allah ordered the wife to obey her husband and prohibited her from disobeying him, because of the enormity of his rights and all that he does for her…. (beat them) means, if advice and ignoring her in the bed do not produce the desired results, you are allowed to discipline the wife, without severe beating….Ibn `Abbas and several others said that the Ayah refers to a beating that is not violent. Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that it means, a beating that is not severe.”

          So according to the tafsir, Allah told men to beat their wives if they were suspected of disobedience — beat them, but not “severe”. The entire modern world has outlawed any beating of wives, whether severe or “not severe”. Islam in this respect (as in many other respects) is illegal in the modern world.

          And moreover, who decides what is a “severe” beating, distinguished from a beating that is “not severe”? I mean, one habibi’s severe beating is another’s “not severe” beating…

          http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=672&Itemid=59

        • Falsafa says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 5:59 pm

          Vogelinian…not good enough…a tafsir written in the middle ages does not appll to the 21st century… read fron tefsirs of current say scholars. I am sure Ibn Kathir carried its weight at the time it was written but not today… the Quran is meant for all ages so one can draw guidance for the current times applying current day normative standards…but it would be wishful thinking expecting some common sense from yourselves?

        • Jack Diamond says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 7:03 pm

          The 7th Century Qur’an and 7th Century model of conduct Muhammad speak for the 21st Century but the classical Islamic scholars do not?! Why you’d think the schools of Islamic law weren’t frozen centuries ago and innovation in religion was criminal apostasy! Let’s get all modern then. Something contemporary:

          “Discipline. The husband has the right to discipline his wife if she disobeys him in something good, not if she disobeys him in something sinful, because Allaah has enjoined disciplining women by forsaking them in bed and by hitting them, when they do not obey. The Hanafis mentioned four situations in which a husband is permitted to discipline his wife by hitting her. These are: not adorning herself when he wants her to; not responding when he calls her to bed and she is taahirah (pure, i.e., not menstruating); not praying; and going out of the house without his permission.”

          “What are the rights of the husband and what are the rights of the wife?”
          Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid, Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 10680

          With regard to wife beating… In a nutshell, it appeared as part of a program to reform the wife. [According to the Koran], first ‘admonish them,’ [then] ‘sleep in separate beds, and beat them.’…This method appeared as part of the treatment of a rebellious wife. I am faced with two options – either the family will be destroyed by divorce, or I can use means that may bring my wife, the mother of my children, back to her senses. The first means is admonishment…The second means of treatment is ‘sleeping in separate beds.’ Why? Because this targets the honor… A lot could be said about this. The strength of a woman lies in her ability to seduce the man. The man is strong and can do whatever he wants, but the woman has a weapon of her own. This weapon can be targeted. Many women will come back to their senses, when they realize that this is what’s involved…By Allah, even if only one woman out of a million can be reformed by light beatings… It’s not really beating, it’s more like punching…
          –Dr. Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, President of Al-Azhar University and former Mufti of Egypt

          Wife-beating is divinely sanctioned in the Qur’an and Hadiths, so it is hardly a surprise it is endemic in the Muslim world, today. Samples:

          “Nearly 90 percent of Afghan women suffer from domestic abuse, according to the United Nations Development Fund for Women. Despite that, there are less than a dozen shelters like this one in Afghanistan, usually run by non-governmental organizations. Abusers are rarely prosecuted or convicted, and most women are afraid to say anything. “Their mothers are beaten by their fathers. They’re beaten by their fathers, by their brothers. It’s a way of life,” said Manizha Naderi, director of WAW.

          91% of university students polled by the Jordanian Human Right Center approve of wife beating. An earlier study by another organization found out that a majority of WOMEN also supports the right of a husband to beat the wife

          According to the [National Family Council] report:
          83% of Jordanian women approve of wife beating if the woman cheats on her husband
          60% approve of wife beating in cases where the wife burns a meal she’s cooking
          52% approve of wife beating in case where she’s refused to follow the husband’s orders

          “A study published in June 2006 in the Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, based on interviews with 300 women admitted to hospital for childbirth, said 80 percent reported being subjected to some kind of abuse within marriage. At times, the violence inflicted on women takes on truly horrendous forms.”

          Of course, we’re only talk about wife beating here which does not include raping your wife–Islam recognizes no such thing, the wife has no right to say no; or polygamy or the husband having right hand possessions; or HONOR KILLING your wife.

          Is this outdated too? Muhammad’s Farewell Sermon in which he reaffirms beating
          beating your wife (women are like domestic animals):

          Now then, O people, you have a right over your wives and they have a right over you. You have [the right] that they should not cause anyone of whom you dislike to tread on your beds; and that they should not commit any open indecency. If they do, then Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from [evil], they have the right to their food and clothing in accordance with the custom. Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from Allah, and you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word of Allah, so understand and listen to my words, O people Tabari Vol. 9, pp. 112-113

        • Peggy says

          Aug 6, 2015 at 9:17 pm

          Give it up already. I don’t care what you say your book of evil preaches because proof is all around us.
          If all the Muslims who are involved in terrorism say that they are getting orders from Allah, Mohammed and the unholy Koran who are you to contradict that?
          You can try to tell us that we don’t understand Islam because we are not Muslim but then so many of your imams preach the same hatred and support IS.
          Do you know better than them?

        • voegelinian says

          Aug 7, 2015 at 2:43 am

          An anonymous hump on the Internet named “Falsafa” thinks he knows better than Ibn Kathir! 🙂 He has yet to prove his claim, that Ibn Kathir is moribund and abrogated in the 21st century Muslim world.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 9:19 pm

        More from Falsafa:

        again total nonsense…stop confusing your christianity with other religions…a sick twisted agenda you must have…
        ………………………………………..

        Notice that Falsafa doesn’t explain how Qur’an 4:34 *doesn’t* condone wife beating. But then, pious Muslims are incapable of reasoned argument.

        And while Muslims regularly beat their wives based on Qur’anic scripture, you don’t find Christians doing the same thing. It should be just the opposite were Falsafa being honest here, which of course he is not.

        Note that he never does overtly condemn wife beating–he just condemns “the agenda” of those who do.

        More, to Stephanie:

        Stephanie…seriously! you’re giving me this as a source…a self serving anti muslim site…why is it that you non muslms thinks that you know better that the those of us in the faith? What is your beef with us really dont understand…are you trying to spread Christianity at all costs? or do you hate middle easter (sic) types really? would be a nightmare to have you as my neighbour for sure!
        ………………………………………..

        The idea that one only hates wife beating if one is Christian is a telling one–but it is not true. Many decent Infidels, including Jews and atheists, hate wife beating as well. And this has *nothing* to do with “middle easter types”, many of whom are Jewish and Christian.

        In fact, this has nothing to do with race or ethnicity at all–many non-Middle Eastern Muslims beat their wives, as well.

        And one does not need “anti muslim sites” for reference to wife beating in Islam–one need only refer to Islamic texts themselves, as well as that of pious Muslim clerics themselves.

        More, in reply to Voegelinian:

        Vogelinian…not good enough…a tafsir written in the middle ages does not appll to the 21st century… read fron tefsirs of current say scholars. I am sure Ibn Kathir carried its weight at the time it was written but not today… the Quran is meant for all ages so one can draw guidance for the current times applying current day normative standards…but it would be wishful thinking expecting some common sense from yourselves?
        ………………………………………..

        Ibn Kathir is widely admired today. But note what Falsafa is saying–that this Qur’anic verse was only of use in the Middle Ages. This would, of course, make him an apostate if we were to take this seriously.

        The fact is that many contemporary Muslim clerics interpret Islamic texts just the same way. And how could they not? Qur’an 4:34 is quite explicit.

        For instance, no less a light than President of Al-Azhar University and Fomer Mufti of Egypt Ahmad Al-Tayyeb said that if a wife was “rebellious” that her husband should “punch her”.

        And Jack Diamond also points out the site Islamic Q and A, which is the most widely read Islamic site in English.

  10. shams78 says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:36 pm

    This is sickening what ISIS is doing to Yazidi girls.

    Yazidis guard their girls chastity extremely tightly. They marry off their own girls at a young age but only to Yazidi boys. They don’t let any non-Yazidis date or marry their girls. In Iraq they performed an honor killing and stoned a girl who was seeing an Arab Muslim male. In Germany, Yazidis also performed an honor killing on a Yazidi girl who had a German Christian boyfriend.

    Most Yazidi asylum seekers making the trek into Germany are men and boys. They deliberately leave most of their women and girls in refugee camps to keep them away from non-Yazidi boys.

    Yazidis must protect their girls from all kinds of non-Yazidi predators. They value honor and chastity for their women- in that field they beat western culture by a large margin.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 9:30 pm

      It’s one of the other appalling Muslim apologists, shams78:

      This is sickening what ISIS is doing to Yazidi girls.
      ………………………………..

      Why? Using Infidels like Christians and Yazidis as sex slaves is perfectly Islamic.

      More:

      Yazidis guard their girls chastity extremely tightly…
      ………………………………..

      Ah–this is the problem–not that Muslims are using them as sex slaves, but that Yazidis are not doing enough to “guard their chastity”. Might that be because ravening Muslims, when not enslaving Yazidi girls, are mass-murdering Yazidi men and boys? In most case, there is no on left to protect these girls from Muslim rapists.

      More:

      In Iraq they performed an honor killing and stoned a girl who was seeing an Arab Muslim male. In Germany, Yazidis also performed an honor killing on a Yazidi girl who had a German Christian boyfriend.
      ………………………………..

      Muslims commit 90% of all “Honor Killings”. I’m sure you don’t have a problem with the actions of your own pious coreligionists. Of course, civilized Westerners condemn this savagery from whatever source.

      More:

      Yazidis must protect their girls from all kinds of non-Yazidi predators.
      ………………………………..

      Typical Muslim blaming of the victims. It is fine that Muslims are raping girls and using them as sex slaves–it is the fault of their murdered male relatives if they do so.

      • shams78 says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 9:46 am

        Stop projecting your ugly fantasies on other people.

    • Joseph says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 4:38 am

      @ shams78
      “Yazidis guard their girls chastity extremely tightly. They marry off their own girls at a young age but only to Yazidi boys.”
      _____________________________________

      Correction there shams. They marry off their own girls to Yazidi *uncles* and *cousins*. Brothers and fathers are OK too if the others have vaporized themselves for Allen.
      Young age shams? Don’t you mean at around 12 years old or as soon as they menstruate which could be as young as 8 to 10.

      • shams78 says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 9:47 am

        Yazidis are not Muslim

        • Western Canadian says

          Aug 8, 2015 at 11:03 am

          No, only the lowest sub-animal filth on the planet, could possibly be devout muslims.

  11. Champ says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    Islamic State murders 19 girls for refusing sex with jihadis, peddles sex slaves like “barrels of petrol”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    What dirty dogs!!! …demon possessed dirty dogs!!! And islam is the death cult from hell and these are *devout* muslims whom worship satan (allah)!

    Perverted-prophet muhammad (perdition be upon him) must be very proud …

    • abad says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 7:54 pm

      They are possessed be demons, no question about that.

      Unfortunately for them, the only one I know of who can cast out demons from a person and make them whole (healed) is Lord Jesus.

      Mohammad had no such abilities.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 2:11 am

      I believe I read somewhere on Jihad Watch that Muhammad refused to have adulterous sex with his beautiful daughter in law.
      How sicko disgusting is that?
      But then Allah insisted he and forced him to agree.
      Poor perv Muhammad had no other choice but to say ” Well ok if you insist”

  12. Stephanie says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    What is honest Ibe HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOper of CAIR say abut this?

    Silent nights, holy nights …

  13. PRCS says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 pm

    Un Envoy Zainab Bangura’s is a hypocrite and is likely professing feigned outrage; for she is a Muslim.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zainab_Bangura

    Are we to believe she doesn’t know that slavery–including sexual slavery–is a divinely authorized tenet of her so-called “religion”?

  14. miriamrove says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 5:23 pm

    @ Falsaf:Why is it that you non muslms thinks that you know better hat the those of us in the faith.

    First of all your name means philosophy which you do not Jack… about it anyways. I was born and raised a muslim. What I forgot about Islam you don’t even know. No one here is anti muslims, rather anti Islam and your pedophile prophet. M

    • Falsafa says

      Aug 6, 2015 at 6:03 pm

      miriamrove..you guys are really hung up about these slanders you keep using to attack a 7th century historical figure with…must be developing into an unhealthy obsession for you guys…feel sorry for your pain really I do!

      • revereridesagain says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 6:31 pm

        He’s not a “7th century historical figure”. He’s a MYTH. But the vicious teachings of the “faith” those who invented him founded are what motivate your irrational hatred all the way out here in the 21st century.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 6, 2015 at 9:41 pm

        Yet more from Falsafa:

        miriamrove..you guys are really hung up about these slanders you keep using to attack a 7th century historical figure with…must be developing into an unhealthy obsession for you guys…feel sorry for your pain really I do!
        ……………………….

        Few modern Westerners would care about the “Prophet” Muhammed any more than they would any other ancient barbarian such as Attila the Hun or Genghis Khan–but the fact is that Muslims all over the world are using his baleful model *today*–to sexually abuse small girls, to kidnap and rape women, to sell slaves and sex slaves, and to murder Infidels–all on gory display in this appalling story above.

        And note the Muslim concept of “slander”–it does not mean a falsehood, but merely saying something that Muslims do not like.

        The Islamic book of law, The Reliance of the Traveller (or ‘Umdat al-Salik’) says that “Slander (Ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a person [a Muslim] that he would dislike.” Likewise, the Hadiths (or recounted sayings and deeds of Muhammad) contain the following account :

        “Do you know what slander is?” They answered, “Allah and His Messenger know best.” He said, “It is to mention of your brother that which he would dislike.” Someone asked, “What if he is as I say?” And he replied, “If he is as you say, you have slandered him, and if not, you have calumniated* him.” — Sunan Abu Dawud

        If we were lauding Muhammed for just the same acts–saying that he is a great sexual athlete for raping multiple women, and putting the filthy Infidels in their place by killing their men and taking their women as sex slaves, then all would be well for pious Muslims like Falsafa.

      • Joseph says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 12:35 am

        @ Falsafa
        I have 26,603 reasons why I dislike Islam and that is just the tip of the iceberg. When you die you will meet my precious Lord and Savior JESUS CHRIST and you will realize just how wrong you are. Then it will be too late and you will go to hell for eternity. Save your soul now and give your life to JESUS while you still have the time.

        • voegelinian says

          Aug 9, 2015 at 5:51 pm

          “Osama bin Laden was so incensed that infidels were on the holy soil of the land of Mecca and Medina, he plotted 9/11. :

          That was only part of bin Laden’s motivation. Raymond Ibrahim has shown that bin Laden regularly issued two communiqués to explain to the world his agenda — those in English to the Dar al Harb, and those in Arabic to the Dar al Islam. The former tended to frame everything in terms of offensive actions done by America and/or the rest of the West; the latter framed things merely in terms of the perennial Islamic desideratum to fight and kill until all submit to Allah and His Prophet. I.e., the real, underlying casus belli in Islam is merely a lack of submission to Allah and His Prophet. Bin Laden was merely acting as the latest spearhead for the perennial Jihad which, since the staggering reversal of Islamic power in the last 300-odd years, has to be restoked and revved up again, as part of its global revival to get it back on track (derailed in the wake up the last major military assault on the West Muslims were able to muster — but lost: the Siege of Vienna in 1683).

        • voegelinian says

          Aug 9, 2015 at 5:52 pm

          correction: “derailed in the wake OF the last major military assault on the West …”

      • Linde Barrera says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 3:42 am

        To Falsafa- I want to offer an historical accounting to you regarding the USA and Iraq. 1. Sadam Hussein was a brutal dictator who regularly commanded that certain citizens be gassed with ricin and mustard gas. 2. Sadam Hussein invaded Kuwait and the cowardly King Saud asked Pres. George H.W. Bush for US troops to be placed in Saudi Arabia to protect him. Stupidly, Pres. George H.W. Bush agreed to protect King Saud with US troops. If I were the US president, I would tell the cowardly King Saud to get his own citizens to protect him! But wait, do the Saudis even have an,army? I doubt it because Muhammed said “War is deceit.” I agree. 3. Osama bin Laden was so incensed that infidels were on the holy soil of the land of Mecca and Medina, he plotted 9/11. That was our thank you for protecting the king. 4. I called my congressman weeks ago to get a copy of the 9/11 report (it has damning evidence against the Saudis) but never got it. Looks like the dysfunction is being protected. 5. Sargat was the only detected place in Iraq to have a chemical weapons facility. 6. An Iraqi emigrant to Germany, Rafi Ahmed al-wan al-Janabi, tipped off Sec. of State Colin Powell about a mobile biological weapons laboratory in Iraq that Rafi later admitted was false. But Colin Powell believed this guy and presented the case to the UN General Assembly on Feb. 5, 2003. So that is what I have learned and I conclude that dealing with anyone who believes in Islam will get short changed due to the lies that are told in the name of Islam. Just please honor this request: don’t ever, never compare Judaism and Christianity with Islam. It would be insulting, since Islam deliberately advocates evil, vile acts. I am not better than anyone, and in fact I do love the Muslims I know. But I hate Islam because it is inspired by Satan the devil, and I feel sorry for any Muslim. But they are human beings and they have a soul. They can change. They can be saved by God Almighty’s Holy Spirit.

        • Joseph says

          Aug 7, 2015 at 4:53 am

          @ Linde
          The funny part about the left is that they say “But there weren’t any chemical weapons found in Iraq” “The Pres. lied to start a war” However as you pointed out Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who regularly commanded that certain citizens (Kurds..*mine*) be gassed with ricin and mustard gas.
          I ask the left where these chemical weapons came from? Of course I don’t get an answer.

      • Joseph says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 4:44 am

        @ Falsafa
        We are not hung up on slanders of Mohammed MPFBCHB(may puss filled boils cover his body) we are just telling the truth.

      • Angemon says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 4:49 am

        Alfalfa posted:

        “you guys are really hung up about these slanders”

        Slander, under islamic law, is to say something someone would rather not be known – essentially, you can be accused of slander for telling the truth. Much like it’s happening here.

        “you keep using to attack a 7th century historical figure with”

        Which historical figure would that be? Wait, are you talking about muhammad, a fictional character made up on 8th or 9th century? LMFAO!!! Historical figure XD

        The flying Spaghetti Monster is as historically sound as muhammad. Scientology is as factual-based as islam.

        “Historical figure”. Nice joke, Alfalfa!!! And they say there’s no humour in islam 😉

  15. abad says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    I feel like vomiting.

    Islam and the Quran is beyond barbaric. It is downright evil in its treatment of women and children.

    Though from what I heard, Mo never had a mother. Nope. He had a goat, and a camel for parents.

  16. Rob says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 9:06 pm

    I hope I survive to see these animals arraigned in the ICC.
    Any rescued girls should tracked and asked to make a written deposition to be held until their tormentors come to trial.

    • Peggy says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 12:11 am

      What trial? Do demons deserve a trial?
      As soon as they are caught they should be handled the same way they handled these girls and others.

  17. gravenimage says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 9:42 pm

    Islamic State murders 19 girls for refusing sex with jihadis, peddles sex slaves like “barrels of petrol”
    ……………………………….

    God, I hate Islam.

    • Peggy says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 7:58 am

      And yet they stone women to death if they have sex with anyone but their husband.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 7, 2015 at 2:48 pm

        Yes. None of this is about “modesty”, as many Infidels mistakenly believe, but just about controlling women through the most savage violence.

        And women are not just stoned to death for having sex with someone other than their husbands–they have been stoned to death for pre-marital sex, for speaking to unrelated men, and for *being the victims of rape*, and daring to report is, which proves that they had “unlawful sex”. The fact that that sex was not consensual makes no difference.

        A little 13-year-old victim of gang rape was stoned to death not long ago in Somalia.

  18. EYESOPEN says

    Aug 6, 2015 at 9:49 pm

    Personally, I should think that ignoring the troll “Falsifa” would keep the thread on track. Don’t feed the trolls, it only encourages them.

    Oh, and if I were one of those 19 young women, I would CERTAINLY prefer death than to be handed over to filthy muzlim savages, who by now are probably passing along many STDs – including AIDS, because they are not civilized enough to keep their p^ckers in their pants and act like humans. Instead they prefer to live – and act – like animals; but then again, that was the MO of arab bedouin culture in the 7th century. Probably hasn’t changed much over the years.

  19. Diana says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 3:21 am

    hey folks, there really is no point in trying to engage in a reasoned debate with an uneducated fascist (islam apologist) like false-afa – he/she has been brain-washed from birth. He or she may actually be a very nice person (as far as that is possible given the circumstances) and in spite of the propagandist programming from which he/she and all muslims have suffered by their enormous misfortune of having been born into this evil death-cult. Maybe he/she may recover one day. After all – pigs maight fly. Actually seriously – live pigs (the 4 legged kind) being loaded onto every single aircraft flight anywhere in the world would actually deter some of these crazy jihadis. So in truth – pigs may soon fly!

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 2:53 pm

      Diana wrote:

      hey folks, there really is no point in trying to engage in a reasoned debate with an uneducated fascist (islam apologist) like false-afa – he/she has been brain-washed from birth.
      ……………………………

      Diana, I don’t reply to Muslim apologists in order to engage them in reasoned debate, since–as you indicate–this is not possible.

      Instead, I reply in order to point out the tactics of Muslim apologists for other readers here at Jihad Watch. The fact is that the posts of Muslim apologists and Muslim supremacists can be quite instructive.

      • Champ says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 2:48 am

        I agree, Graven, and I’ve gained a lot of insight — over the years — from your spot on analysis.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 9:26 pm

          Thank you, Champ!

  20. duh_swami says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 8:06 am

    Allah is one mean spirited POS for a god…Anyone who believes in ‘it’ simply cannot be trusted…This ‘god’ called Allah, has some very depraved and sadistic interests, that it passes on to the pious…
    His book full of depravity is taken as gospel by the pious, who have sold their souls to the devil for not ’30 pieces of silver’, but free sex and extreme sadistic violence, and the raw display of illegitimate power…The religion of savagery is the result…
    Disgusting, isn’t it?

  21. Jay Boo says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 11:22 am

    Muslims wash before prayers.

    Then a Pig bath of ‘prayer’ allows filth inside.

    • Falsafa says

      Aug 8, 2015 at 4:26 am

      what an ignorant fool you are jay boo…i pity you

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 15, 2015 at 9:29 pm

        Pious Muslims pray before and after raping their victims:

        “He said that raping me is his prayer to God”

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/he-said-that-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god

        That sort of savagery sounds like filth to decent Infidels such as Jay Boo and myself–but not to pious Muslims such as Falsafa.

  22. Edward says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 2:21 pm

    “The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.”

    Divinity? Sanctioning of enslaved human beings is not what a merciful God would allow under any condition. Even, to not complying with man’s comfort and/or physical needs. A true God’s (not an illusory god) creation would be pleasured to endow that creation with sovereign autonomy. Presently, Islam is the only religion that allows to wrongly abusing women, which are openly considered to be a disposable commodity. BTW, where is the UN on this matter?

    As for the Koran being an unadulterated god inspired holy book is getting to be questioned.

    More http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122633888141714211

    More this matter @:

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122669909279629451

    This Wall Street Journal’s articles were published on Nov 2008 and did not cause the ire of the Muslim world then. Perhaps, Islam’s Apologetics considered it a nerve pinching outcome if they had added their say; so if they had objected to what a German Professor, a Muslim convert, who contended that: “It’s Likely the Prophet Muhammad Never Existed”.

    As always, the Islamists keep quiet on matters they can’t contest….the general idea is “if we say nothing it will soon die away”! Psychologically, all trending episodes will wither away if we don’t entertain it in our minds!

    Maybe the professor’s theory can bear some informative fruit…..that “mohummad” was just a figment on someone’s mind. If this is such the case….a great state of deception has lasted for the past 1400 years. That has and is causing great misery and untold bondage of its victims!

  23. Linda Rivera says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 4:06 pm

    Every non-Muslim nation on earth has a MORAL responsibility to rescue the sex slaves in Iraq, Syria and Britain.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.