• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Blogging the Qur’an
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Islamic State stones five women to death for not wearing the veil

Aug 19, 2015 5:09 pm By Robert Spencer

NiqabOur moral superiors are very concerned about the right of Muslim women in Western countries to cover their heads. Barack Obama has affirmed this: “Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That’s why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would deny it.” — Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009

But what about the right of women and girls not to wear the hijab or any other head covering, and to go out with faces unveiled? Who is speaking up for the rights of Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it; and of Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab; and of the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and of Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and of Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and of the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and of the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and of the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and of the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and of the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and of the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and of the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and of the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab.

When will anyone stand in solidarity with them? Women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?

“ISIS stones five women to death for not wearing the veil, says Mamouzini,” by Abdelhak Mamoun, Iraqi News, August 18, 2015 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

(IraqiNews.com) Dohuk – Media official of the Kurdistan Democratic Party in Mosul Saeed Mamouzini revealed on Tuesday, that ISIS has stoned five women to death in Mosul.

Mamouzini said in an interview for IraqiNews.com, “ISIS elements stoned five women to death in Ghazlani camp in Mosul.”

Mamouzini added that “This came under the pretext of not wearing the veil and refusing to comply with the orders of the organization.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Ditto (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Kurdistan Democratic Party, Saeed Mamouzini


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Champ says

    Aug 19, 2015 at 5:31 pm

    Know islam = Know IS
    No islam = No IS

    islam & company are replete with misogyny & murder …

    And muhammad (perdition be upon him) hated and abused women, as well.

    • Joseph says

      Aug 19, 2015 at 6:19 pm

      Champ,
      Know Islam = Know IS
      No Islam = No IS

      now that is a t-shirt print if I ever saw one.

      • Champ says

        Aug 19, 2015 at 7:49 pm

        You’re right it is, Joseph!

        • Joseph says

          Aug 20, 2015 at 1:26 pm

          Champ, I thought you made that up, I did not know it was an actual shirt print. I was not trying to poke you or anything so please don’t take my post wrong. Just like the last time you came up with that great saying to put on a picket sign I thought you also pulled this one out of your grey matter. This just shows you how much I get around.
          Anyhoo, it still is a great T-shirt print and please remember, my post was not a poke at you.
          Hope all is well with you & yours, little Gwyn. especially.

    • M S case says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 4:58 pm

      And the west just ignores what is happening

  2. mortimer says

    Aug 19, 2015 at 6:07 pm

    What? The failure to veil is PUNISHED? I’m shocked! We are told constantly by Muslim women that the veil is ‘a choice’. What choice?

    The progress of veiling is this: 1) it’s ‘a choice’ 2) it’s ‘a custom’ 3) it’s recommended 4) it’s the rule 5) it’s punishable if you don’t wear it.

    Why start this sequence? The time to stop veiling is before 1). Veiling demeans women’s equality and cannot be accepted. Period.

    • Angemon says

      Aug 19, 2015 at 8:15 pm

      It’s as much of a choice as getting stoned to death (and not in a Cheech and Chong fashion) – it’s the choice between abiding by the rules or facing the consequences.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 2:20 pm

      Here’s another indication of such “choice”, from a pious Imam, Mohammad Al-Jibaly. He said, “A girl should start hijab from the age of seven. By the age of ten, it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear Hijab, and if she doesn’t wear Hijab, we hit her”.

  3. Karen says

    Aug 19, 2015 at 11:19 pm

    This is why I’ve found all the stories about the ‘Covered Girl’ days in U.S. high schools so disturbing; they are billed by clueless faculty as events to ‘educate’ about the hijab, and the rights of Muslim women/girls to wear it (as if they were not already perfectly free to do so in this free country). All the while seeking support and solidarity of minor, non-Muslim girls who don’t know what the hijab really is in most other parts of the world. Dreadful, Dreaded Sharia.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 2:21 pm

      Yes.

  4. Dave J says

    Aug 19, 2015 at 11:21 pm

    This demonstrates that the Islamic mentality is straight from the stone age – wear your shaming coverup or we’ll kill you. Yet somehow Western feminists seem to overlook or even accept this war on women.

    I guess they’re too busy with equal pay and LGBT rights to notice.

    • Linde Barrera says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 1:32 am

      To Dave J- Funny that you mention western feminists. Just this evening I sent an email to the National Organization of Women (NOW) who are located right here in NYC. I asked them if they would speak up in opposition to FGM in conjunction with the UN or some other human rights organization. I also explained what this procedure does to a young girl, and also mentioned that most Islamic countries (who receive billions in US aid) sanction FGM. I will advise JW if I get a response.

      • ich says

        Aug 20, 2015 at 6:51 am

        awesome Linde !!

    • abad says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 7:09 pm

      Yeah no, the real reason some western feminists are so gung-ho about covering up is that think it will prevent men from looking at them.

      And you know these type of feminists: they find it offensive if a man does glance at them. He doesn’t even need to catcall nor look at the woman’s “assets” if you know what I mean.

  5. Cecilia Ellis says

    Aug 20, 2015 at 4:47 am

    “Women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West.”

    Regrettably, the above statement is correct. As an example and further to the cited reports, Saudi Arabia ensures compliance of its citizens through the constant vigilance of the Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (Mutaween) – the religious police. Invested in the purity of its women, at all cost, events occur that evince their priority is the Islamic dress code. For example, in March 2002, a fire broke out at an all-girls’ school in Mecca. Rushing to escape the flames, the girls fled the building, not stopping to don head scarves or abayas. They were forced back into the burning building by the Mutaween and the doors were locked for one reason: The Mutaween feared sexual enticement by the girls’ physical contact with civil defense forces. As such, fifteen girls died and more than fifty were injured. [1] In another incident, a Saudi female student died when male paramedics were prohibited from administering life-saving assistance because of concerns about the student being uncovered. [2]

    While ISIS brutally administers swift justice to those judged non-compliant with restrictive dress codes, they are not alone. In a report issued by the U. S. Department of State in November 2001, the Taliban were cited as severely punishing “even the accidental showing of the feet or ankles” by on-the-spot beatings. [3] Boko Haram also enforces strict rules on women’s attire, flogging them for failure to wear the hijab. [4][5] These terrorists groups merely enforce the Islamic praxis of women’s subjugation at every level of their existence.

    Should Muslim families leave their Muslim-majority homelands, there is little cause to believe that females will leave behind their “prisons of cloth,” for as President Obama stated in his 2009 speech in Cairo, “It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretense of liberalism.” [6] While some people eagerly embrace their new freedoms, what goes on behind closed doors may well translate to “some people enjoy less freedoms than others” . . . if they are women.

    Nevertheless, there is no significant effort by Western countries or national organizations to confront the atrocities committed against women by men inspired to demonstrate their religious zeal. Rather, these victims end up as nameless footnotes, if mentioned at all, in a U. N. Council on Human Rights report issued months later. That there is no apparent international outrage indicates that rhetoric is shallow. Even now, we do not know the names of those five who were stoned to death. Sadly, they already have become nameless footnotes in an ever-increasing roster of ISIS human rights violations.

    —–

    [1] https://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/mutawsc.htm
    [2] http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2014/02/06/Death-of-Saudi-female-student-raises-uproar.html
    [3] http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/6185.htm
    [4] http://ojs.st-andrews.ac.uk/index.php/jtr/article/view/828/707
    [5] http://nigeriavillagesquare.com/forum/main-square/73866-boko-haram-flogs-women-not-wearing-hijab-allah-help-naijas-women.html
    [6] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    • Karen says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 2:06 pm

      “We cannot disguise hostility toward any religion behind the pretense of liberalism”. What a great quote. Mr O would “impede” many Christian denominations from following their faith (eg forcing health care coverage for abortions, etc.) He has shown himself to be quite hostile to the free practice of certain religions, in the name of liberalism.

      • Cecilia Ellis says

        Aug 22, 2015 at 4:33 am

        Karen wrote: “He has shown himself to be quite hostile to the free practice of certain religions, in the name of liberalism.”

        Absolutely on-target with that statement, Karen!

  6. Ed says

    Aug 20, 2015 at 5:57 am

    The regularity of these atrocities renders it not news worthy. The world looks the other way and focusses on the more pressing issue of demonising those that oppose it.
    This is murder, and as 5 women were killed it makes the perpetrators twisted serial killers right up there with the likes of Bundy and Dahmer. Why won’t the world see it this way? I fail to see the difference.

    • Cecilia Ellis says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 6:27 am

      Gosh, Ed, there’s a lot of truth in what you wrote!

  7. Ed says

    Aug 20, 2015 at 6:51 am

    If a serial killer claimed in court that 5 victims deserved to die because they were wearing the wrong clothes, he’d be executed or put away for life.
    That’s what we have right here.
    Islam creates serial killers with a sick depraved mentality.

  8. Emjay See says

    Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 am

    In 1952, in Cairo(Egypt) and Turkey and other Muslim states I found the head scarves were not worn. In deed the ladies in Cairo were more French in their dress than the French in Paris. YES THEY WERE DOLLY BIRDS

  9. mach37 says

    Aug 20, 2015 at 1:18 pm

    Someone please explain why pictures taken on the streets of Tehran show the majority of women NOT wearing hijabs. The streets look almost like those in Western cities. Are these women not true Muslims? Are Iranian women given special dispensation to not follow the path of Islam?

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 20, 2015 at 2:36 pm

      The Religious Police perform periodic crackdowns, and the Basij militiamen cruise the streets looking for uncovered girls to beat or arrest. Sometimes Iranians can “get away” with more than at other times. But the specter of enforcement is always there.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
  • 2016
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
  • 2015
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
  • 2014
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
  • 2013
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
  • 2012
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
  • 2011
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
  • 2010
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
  • 2009
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
  • 2008
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • 2007
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
  • 2006
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
  • 2005
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
  • 2004
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
  • 2003
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • March 2003

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • LB on UK: Man converts to Islam, threatens to kill Boris Johnson and Theresa May and eat May’s corpse
  • LB on Turkish daily claims ancient site in Thessaloniki built 300 years before Muhammad is a mosque
  • ronyvo on ATF offers $5,000 reward for info on hijabbed Muslima who started fires during George Floyd riots
  • Aunty Podes on Catholic bishop: Pope’s claim that Quran opposes violence “not true simply based on a plain reading of the Quran”
  • ronyvo on Joe Biden issues statement on anniversary of Orlando jihad massacre, mum about Islamic motive of jihad mass murderer

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.