• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Jamie Glazov Moment – How Leftists Hate Muslims

Aug 7, 2015 6:03 am By Jamie Glazov

[The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program. Please donate to keep it alive, subscribe to its YouTube Channel and LIKE it on Facebook.

For details on advertising on our show or arranging your own appearance on a special segment, email us at theglazovgang@gmail.com.]

In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss “How Leftists Hate Muslims,” building on the first and second episodes titled: “Why I Love Muslims.”

In this segment, I wonder where all the leftists are helping oppressed Muslim women under Islamic gender apartheid.

Don’t miss this special Jamie Glazov Moment!

Subscribe to Jamie Glazov Productions and LIKE Jamie’s Fan Page on Facebook.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Sharia Tagged With: Jamie Glazov Moment


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Dan says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 7:19 am

    Another difference between how left and right deal with social issues is that most of the left seem to require constant recognition.

    Liberals need that pat on the back, someone to say “Oh, you’re such a marvelous human being” so they can bask, and feign modesty, whereas conservatives will just go in, get their hands dirty, and go home.

    Which is why it’s so ridiculous to see Obama with sleeves rolled up while addressing in so speeches. People do that when they’ve been unexpectedly forced to do some thing dirty, say change a flat on the way to a wedding.

    Although when you think about it, Obama’s hands are just about always in something dirty…

    In any case, most times you don’t even know what causes a conservative is involved in because they understand actions speak louder than words.

    A liberal will try to organize some kind of anti whatever protest, an anti litter rally let’s say, (Where they leave the grounds a pig sty.), whereas a conservative just doesn’t litter in the first place and picks up a few pieces of somebody else’s every day.

    The other thing is that influences liberals big time, is public opinion. Nothing will keep a them from an issue more that public disinterest, or scare them off faster than the public mocking.

    If you can’t make a logical case to a conservative, why some issue isn’t worth the effort, the conservative will just plod on, and maybe even tell you to blank off.

    • Draki says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 7:52 am

      You’re right. They desperately need affirmation. I think the example of the leftist crying over not getting affirmation from many women for not wanting to wear a bikini demonstrates some of this stupidity. It’s sad that their self-esteem is easily swayed by others opinions. I wish my disdain for their opinions hurt their feelings more though….

    • Angemon says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 7:59 am

      Dan posted:

      “Liberals need that pat on the back, someone to say “Oh, you’re such a marvelous human being” so they can bask, and feign modesty”

      Pretty much.

    • Kerri says

      Aug 8, 2015 at 10:36 am

      ALIPAC Publishes A Target List Of GOP Amnesty Supporters For 2016
      http://www.alipac.us/f8/cantor-list-321399/

  2. RonaldB says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 9:22 am

    I’ll be frank.

    I don’t love Muslims. I don’t hate them or wish them harm, but I’m just as happy if they’re not here.

    I don’t have any intention of taking action against FGM in Muslim countries. The best way to prevent the practice is to have a somewhat secular dictatorship in a Muslim country where the dictator want to enforce some modicum of modernity on the backward Muslim population. When the US participates in the overthrow of Muslim dictators like Saddam Hussein, Assad, Ghadafi, Mubarak, and the Shah of Iran, we’re opening the door to sharia law and more FGM. It’s something to consider when our Presidents and CIA play power politics by deposing ruthless dictators in the Middle East.

    I’m intensely concerned with keeping FGM out of Western countries, especially for Muslim women here. The best way is to keep the Muslim population low: the more Muslims here, the more Muslims develop their own areas, their own schools and their own social systems, in which they can cover up FGM practices. For a Muslim (or anyone) who carries out FGM here, it should be a major felony for ALL concerned, fathers, brothers, wives, sisters and grandmothers. They should face major prison time and expulsion if not US citizens.

    For feminists, FGM is a minor issue. If you scratch them, they’re against it, but you have to do a lot of searching on websites like the National Organization for Women before you find anything on it at all. I just did a search for “mutilation” on the NOW website, and there were five hits, none since 2010. So, it’s not a major issue, next to something like support for Planned Parenthood. I’m not on the anti-Planned Parenthood jihad, but I believe public funding for it should be discontinued so anti-abortion people don’t find themselves supporting a practice they abhor.

    There is also a segment of feminists who defend FGM as a “local” custom, and thus worthy of preservation or at least tolerance, as it’s “indigenous”. I have very little understanding of this type of thinking by someone who considers herself a “feminist”.

  3. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 9:33 am

    Even the word “liberal” is wrong, it’s turnspeak. The central fact of socialism is you put a bureaucrat in as a middle man, and thereby give up a certain amount of freedom. That being so, liberals are quick to turn against free speech, even free thought. Just take a look at Stockholm, it is a dangerous place to criticize Moslems, and few Americans are even remotely aware of what’s going on up there.

  4. Jay Boo says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 11:06 am

    NPR allowed Bill Maher to discuss his views on religion last night.

    Bill mocked Judaism and Christianity relentlessly, but did not mention Islam at all.
    Not once.
    Either he was pandering to his NPR leftists audience or Islam was edited out.

    • Angemon says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 2:08 pm

      Or maybe he doesn’t like to risk his neck, both figuratively and literally.

  5. voegelinian says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 12:09 pm

    Glazov is right that Leftists actually have a condescending contempt for Muslims, effectively treating like animals incapable of assuming human responsibility for their actions — not to mention that Leftists turn a blind eye to the horrific suffering of so many Muslims under Sharia law and other depradations of Islamic culture.

    However, Glazov the ex-Leftist is dead wrong in his bleeding heart concern for Muslims, taking great (and fantasy-based) care to distinguish them from the Islam/Allah/Koran/Muhammad they adore & enable — which adoration and enablement is threatening our societies increasingly with the global revival of Islam in our time. Glazov evidently hasn’t thought long enough of how Stockholm Syndrome ensnares & entrances Muslims, turning victims of Islam into agents of Islam we must protect our societies from. Our #1 priority should be the safety of our own societies, not the welfare of Muslims. As with the case of many Exes, they seem to retain vestiges in their psyche of the worldview they otherwise doth protest too much to eschew (a few ex-Muslims I’ve noticed are that way). It seems Glazov and his colleague David Horowtiz, both ex-Leftists, share this dynamic.

    • Jamie says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 4:19 pm

      Please provide the evidence that I am a former leftist.

      • voegelinian says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 10:56 am

        I’ll take Glazov’s word that (implies that) he is not an ex-Leftist in the avowed sense David Horowitz is. I.e., I was wrong about that assertion. That assertion, however, was the less important part of my comment, and has no necessary function in my main argument. In a following comment, “Mo” touched on the more important parts, but bungled his comprehension of them something fierce, evincing a lack of awareness about certain aspects of the problem of Islam which rather surprise me — even as jaded as I have become by now of the asymptotics.

        His retort, for example, that —

        “It’s “fantasy based” to distinguish Muslim people from Islam, Allah, the Koran and Muhammad? That doesn’t even make sense.”

        — manifests a comprehension level of a bag of rocks, with all the subtlety of a ballpeen hammer trying to fix something that requires a Phillips screwdriver. Of course, reading that one phrase of mine only on the surface (and without taking the care to factor in my other words all around that phrase), it doesn’t make sense to say that Muslims are not distinguishable from Islam. My words clearly didn’t rest on that simplistic surface, however. I clearly followed that up by explaining the kind of distinction I’m talking about — namely, Muslims as enablers of Islam (and of Allah’s commands in the Koran and of Muhammad’s commands in the Sunna).

        Thus, I mentioned the peculiarly powerful phenomenon in Islamic culture and psychology of “Stockholm Syndrome”, which “ensnares & entrances Muslims, turning victims of Islam into agents of Islam we must protect our societies from”. And an important part of why they become agents and enablers that threaten us like is is because of “the Islam/Allah/Koran/Muhammad they adore & enable — which adoration and enablement is threatening our societies increasingly with the global revival of Islam in our time.”

        Another Jihad Watch reader commenting on Glazov’s previous installment of this series (“Why I Love Muslims”), explained succinctly the unremarkable point I was making which so mystifies Mo:

        alyn21 says

        July 26, 2015 at 6:08 am

        I don’t understand how we are supposed to love Muslims if we are opposed to islam. Isn’t that like saying we oppose Nazism but love the nazis?? The definition of a Muslim is someone who follows islam. So unless a person is an ex muslim or trying to become an ex muslim how do you separate the two?

        Another reader was even blunter:

        Tim says

        July 24, 2015 at 12:12 pm

        I’m sorry but I disagree. That is like claiming you love Nazis but dislike Nazism. Fact is someone would not become or want to stay a Muslim if they don’t agree to the ideology – no more so than anyone would become a Nazi unless they agree with Nazism.

        (And Tim’s follow-up comment to an asymptotic Counter-Jihadist, one “Buffster” — who anxiously came along to try to argue for a vast, albeit unspecified, demographic of poor, hapless Muslims who don’t know their own Islam as a kind of theoretical end-run around this elementary problem of distinguishing Muslims from Islam — was excellent: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/07/jamie-glazov-moment-why-i-love-muslims/comment-page-1#comment-1272274 )

        As for the bleeding heart concern for Muslims which I maintained informs Glazov’s perspective on this (and which seems to puzzle & befuddle Mo so), that requires a bit more reading into the matter than Mo seems to have cared to trouble himself over.

        One good foothold into this area of my argument may be gleaned from yet another Jihad Watch reader, one “Peter”, who in that same thread noted above wrote a fine comment which begins to palpate the problem of what I call “asymptotic” (a term I use to denote when individuals who are not PC MC (and who often swear vehemently that they are not PC MC) nevertheless manifest one or more tics, spasms, reflexes, coughs, burps, and intestinal rumblings of PC MC in their rhetoric — and where I understand PC MC to be a kind of decaffeinated Leftism with enough pleasant cream & sugar added to seduce even many a Conservative or Centrist whenever the problem of Islam and/or Muslims comes up):

        Peter says

        July 24, 2015 at 2:11 pm

        Enough already. Saying it is Islam and not Muslims is just acquiescing to the Left’s point of view and means trying to debate them on their turf.

        There is no Islam without Muslims. As long as there are Muslims, the will be Islam.

        (Alas, Peter veers off into La-La Land when he ends his otherwise sound comment with this: “The solution is that we need Muslims to become non-muslims (apostates, Christians, Jehovas Winesses, Moonies …I couldn’t care less) and then Islam is no more. There needs to be a strategy to help Muslims liberate themselves from this barbaric religion.” — which I agree, as Hamlet would say, “tis a consummation devoutly to be wished” — but wishing something doesn’t make it so, so my Aunt Ruth used to tell me. And this particular wish, that enough Muslims (hundreds of millions) will apostasize to solve our problem of Islam, reflects a colossal basket into which to put our eggs, a prospect for which not only do we not have sufficient evidence, there remain mountains of contraindicating evidence as Islam undergoes a global revival catching more and more Muslims on fire with devotion and zeal to their cause.)

        But Peter was on to something with his perceptive observation that

        Saying it is Islam and not Muslims is just acquiescing to the Left’s point of view and means trying to debate them on their turf.

        This anxious concern to remind the PC MC mainstream that “we are against Islam, we are not against Muslims” is indeed a way of letting the PC MCs (and their more robust cousins, the Leftists) control the Conversation. This concern stems either from a kind of namby-pamby approach to debate, gingerly and timid to assert one’s stance without apology or shame in Breitbartian manner — or from a sincere worldview that actually agrees with the PC MCs on certain points (hence my term “asymptotic”).

        In that same former thread I alluded to above, I went into greater detail on my argument:

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/07/jamie-glazov-moment-why-i-love-muslims/comment-page-1#comment-1272751

        — and in so doing, I provided a link to an older essay I wrote about Glazov which further fleshes out this phenomenon:

        Glazovianism

        http://glossaryhesperado.blogspot.com/2009/01/glazovianism.html

        (And as an afterthrought, I would greatly appreciate it if any of the astute Jihad Watch readers I cite above would take the time and trouble to read the response (speaking of “tics, spasms, reflexes, coughs, burps, and intestinal rumblings of PC MC in the rhetoric” of the typical asymptotic…) of one “Angemon”, and to dispatch it please. I used to fend with Angemon many moons ago, until I tired of his obsessive-compulsive rabbit trails and sophistry. It would be nice for him to see that other readers here don’t accept his convoluted nonsense — but he certainly would never get that impression when nobody bothers to respond to his literally hundreds of attacks on my stance over the months, if not years, in various comments threads here on Jihad Watch.)

        • Angemon says

          Aug 8, 2015 at 1:08 pm

          voegelinian posted:

          “(And as an afterthrought, I would greatly appreciate it if any of the astute Jihad Watch readers I cite above would take the time and trouble to read the response (speaking of “tics, spasms, reflexes, coughs, burps, and intestinal rumblings of PC MC in the rhetoric” of the typical asymptotic…) of one “Angemon”, and to dispatch it please.”

          You’re done badgering people via email and now you’re trying to recruit on site? Anything but fighting your own battles, right?

          “ I used to fend with Angemon many moons ago”

          By which you mean you accused me of having brain damage or being a troll for questioning you, or compared reading my posts with swimming in urine and feces. That, and demanding others to jump in to defend you rather than, you know, explaining why is it that you think I’m wrong. It seems fact-based discussion in good faith is too much for you.

          “until I tired of his obsessive-compulsive rabbit trails and sophistry.”

          Again, fact-based discussion in good faith is too much for you – much better to throw accusations of mental illness and “sophistry” around without actually explaining the reasoning behind them.

          “ It would be nice for him to see that other readers here don’t accept his convoluted nonsense”

          You never explained why anything I said is “convoluted”, “nonsense” or both. What we’ve seen so far is that others have issues with what you say, not with what I say. And that includes your demands of white-knighting. That never stopped you from spouting your rants.

          “but he certainly would never get that impression when nobody bothers to respond to his literally hundreds of attacks on my stance over the months, if not years, in various comments threads here on Jihad Watch.”

          Several things to point out here. You use “attack” to describe any kind of criticism you get. Others have responded to what I say, but you choose to ignore it because, as I pointed out before, they chose to tell you what amounts to “either answer his criticism or stop whining”. As for “months, if not years”, I’ve asked you several times to link to one of my alleged “attacks” that goes further back than July-August 2014. Still waiting for that.

          The irony here is that you’re accusing Jamie of being a former leftist – and I’ve pointed out before that you spend most of your time, here, going back years, working to undermine and discredit forefront figures of the Counter-Jihad movement, like Robert Spencer, Hugh Fitzgerald, Raymond Ibrahim, Jamie Glazov, etc. – when you’re the one who has been consistently running tactics straight out of the leftist play-book, like demanding others to come in and bully anyone who disagrees with you to silence.

    • Mo says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 10:48 pm

      @ voegelinian

      “However, Glazov the ex-Leftist is dead wrong in his bleeding heart concern for Muslims, ”

      What evidence do you have that Jamie is an ex-Leftists?

      What “bleeding heart concern” is that?

      “taking great (and fantasy-based) care to distinguish them from the Islam/Allah/Koran/Muhammad they adore & enable”

      It’s “fantasy based” to distinguish Muslim people from Islam, Allah, the Koran and Muhammad?

      That doesn’t even make sense.

      Now, please provide the evidence requested.

  6. cs says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 1:09 pm

    I only half agree with him on that one. It would require a long text to explain it.
    Also the left is wrong in not confronting this truly fascist ideology who wishes GLBT, feminists, libertarians of all kinds, Jews, Christians, dead or converted and submitting to sharia, that means that most, but not all, left wingers are not honest intellectuals, as most of them have double standards in terms of moral judgment. What is a disgrace.

  7. Beth says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 2:18 pm

    I love people. I hate Muslims. I believe there is a distinct difference between the two.

    Are those who bow down to the teaching of beheadings – people? (some call them animals – some call them monsters)

    I do believe that there are many people living in Muslim lands who are not muslims – but agree to that name being assigned to them for fear.

    If a Muslim refuses to carry out the commands of their own Koran – then they’re not muslims – are they?

    As for the ‘leftists’ not stepping up to the plate to defend ”””’people”””” who are being persecuted? What else is new? Neither do they help the Christians who are being slaughtered (just for being Christians) – slaughtered by Muslims – who ARE carrying out the commands of their Koran.

    I’m sorry Jamie – but you have lost me on this one. Words matter. Especially the word “Muslim” and “Koran” when it comes to crimes being committed against the people (no matter who those people are).

    • Mo says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 10:45 pm

      @ Beth

      Later on in your comment you say, “Words matter.” Yes, they do.

      “I love people. I hate Muslims. I believe there is a distinct difference between the two.”

      Muslims are people who profess the ideology of Islam.

      The rest of you comment makes no sense.

      • Beth says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 3:35 pm

        I’m comfortable with the word hate – and here is why:

        Spoken by a man after God’s own heart, – King David:

        Psa 139:21 Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?

        Psa 139:22 I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.

        Know this…

        The Koran preaches Beheadings, Gang Rape, Crucifixions, Mass Murder (of those who choose not to believe the same as they do).

        I hate all murderers, rapists and all those who would do such things. If any reject those commands – then they’re not Muslims – no matter how much they claim to be.

        Jamie is not helping those who are under oppression by Islam – by giving honor to the name “Muslim”

        Just my opinion. But I believe it would be the opinion of Christ as well. Islam calls the Son of God an abomination and all of His eye-witnesses (His Apostles) liars. I’m not ok with that.

        And I do believe that Jamie owes it to all Christians to point that fact out. If he does, – then how can he (afterwards) be a friend of any Muslim?

        Just being honest here.

  8. Beth says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 2:30 pm

    You know what Jamie? – You’re not helping those people. You’re helping their perpetrators – by honoring the word “Muslim”.

  9. Voytek Gagalka says

    Aug 7, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    Leftists are SOOOO one dimensional to the point of caricature. It seems to me that their universe is totally flat, and flatten even more so by their embedded malice.

    • Jamie Glazov says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 4:21 pm

      Very good point Voytek, thank you.

    • cs says

      Aug 7, 2015 at 7:31 pm

      Hummmm, no, I know a lot of them who are completely devoid of malice, they are just brainwashed, believing that the right thing to do is to follow (blindly) people like Chomsky, Finkestein or Zizek. And that is very stupid in the end. It displays a dogmatic approach to problems that is in fact uni-dimensional.

      • Beth says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 4:44 pm

        Thank you cs

  10. muskat antonopolis says

    Aug 8, 2015 at 9:20 am

    there is NO middle ground….to be a muslim it is required that you obey the Koran (and
    any interpretation by any nut)..or off with your head…you either ARE a muslim or you are NOT….all this pandering to so called “peaceful” muslims…if you pick up a deadly snake and it bites you whose fault is it..the snake or yours,,and no matter your logic
    for picking up the snake, after your bitten,,,,,,you are still bitten…..there is NO point
    for the three little pigs opening the door to the big bad wolf just because the wolf had
    said ..oh, I don’t eat pork anymore, I am a vegan……would you believe the wolf? Come
    on people, the nature of the beast is the nature of the beast and it will not change
    Volantarily……NO MORE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM>>>>>any and all who call
    themselves muslim and are currently in the borders of the usa or employeed there-by
    here or abroad MUST be required to reaffirm their OATH OF ALLEIGANCE…not
    the doctored up one…but the Original…….no more free lunches for those who are or
    who support those who kill American citizens…..this has got to STOP and pray God
    that it will with a new President……

    • Beth says

      Aug 8, 2015 at 4:55 pm

      This is the part that Jamie, for some reason, has chosen to toss aside.

      Facts are facts Jamie – Their Koran commands mass murder of those who choose not to believe in the same god as they do.

      You have aloud yourself to be fooled by a lie – to ignore the facts of what their Koran (which makes them Muslims) preaches – and that is Rape and murder.

      You either take a stand against that which is not right – or you defend it – so that it can continue, – unhindered. There is no in-between.

  11. Gordon miller says

    Aug 8, 2015 at 9:24 am

    I’m a proud conservative, and indeed I don’t hate Muslims……I just feel better when they’re not around.

  12. solange says

    Aug 8, 2015 at 3:41 pm

    On the term “leftists;” Maybe, some day, you will stop playing the age old divide and conquer game. By doing so, you continue to away our power to the powers that be. I would expound, but feel it would fall on deaf ears, deaf ears wanting to label and laugh at me for being a “conspiracy theorist,” even as many conspiracies are now becoming our new reality, e.g., forced vaccinations. I would have shared this were it not for that devisiveness. Time to wake up.

  13. Uncle Vladdi says

    Aug 8, 2015 at 6:04 pm

    If leftists didn’t get to complain about others, they’d have to gasp! work for a living! And, since complaining about criminals (“muslims”) is dangerous work, they won’t.

    And Yeah – “only” 97% of muslims engage in FGM – that’s “only” 700 million young girls! Whee!

    Finally, Yes of course, Jamie, liberals have total contempt for muslims! And that’s because liberals are racists: they always assume that ONLY White Western people (including, of course, the Jews in Israel,) are INTELLIGENT enough to be guilty of being truly evil, while all their pet “People Of Colour” (including the “swarthy palestinians”) being mentally inferior and all, just can’t help being enslaved by their instincts and emotions into acting as violent animals when frustrated, the poor oppressed little dears, so the liberals will always indulge their crimes, much as one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs.

    • Beth says

      Aug 8, 2015 at 6:35 pm

      I’m not a racist. Any nationality can be a Muslim. Even the blacks – which (btw) are called “raison heads” by the Koran – which by the way – says that “Jews are people who will listen to any lie” – a very evil thing to say – Don’t ya think?

      Wouldn’t you say?

      Oh, and btw – want those Koran writings? Chapters and verses? So that you can read them for yourself? (I do not call them Scriptures)

      Give an answer – if you dare. That is – if you’re not a racist. Like you would want everyone to believe.

      I’m not a racist – and I can prove it – by defending the races. Just by using (and exposing) the Koran. How about you?

      • Beth says

        Aug 8, 2015 at 6:39 pm

        Humor me here Uncle Vladdi – Please – for the sake of Jamie being offended with the truth. Just do it.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.