William Kilpatrick offers a broad analysis of how “the multicultural experiment of elevating other cultures by denigrating our own” fosters widespread detachment from our civilizational identity, and breeds allies for Islamic supremacism: “As befits two movements with global ambitions, the leftist-Islamist alliances are cropping up all over the planet… Sometimes the alliance goes beyond moral and financial support and manifests itself in actual violence.”
“Multiculturalism and the Rise of Domestic Terrorism,” by William Kilpatrick, Crisis Magazine, August 18, 2015:
In a speech launching a five-year plan to combat homegrown terrorism, UK Prime Minister David Cameron said that “Many people born in Britain have little attachment to the country and that makes them vulnerable to radicalization.”
It’s not as though Muslims who live in Britain don’t eat fish and chips or root for their local football club. But, apparently, a not insignificant number can indulge in British pastimes and still feel unconnected to the country they live in. In her 2006 book Londonistan, Melanie Phillips described how a separate and alien culture had developed in England as a result of Britain’s experiment in multiculturalism—an experiment that had been fostered by British elites in media, government, and even in churches.
The problem was, said Phillips, that in order to make room for other cultures, the elites had hollowed out their own culture so that “British society presented a moral and philosophical vacuum that was ripe for colonization by predatory Islamism.” She laid much of the blame on educators:
The British education system simply ceased transmitting either the values or the story of the nation to successive generations, delivering instead the message that truth was an illusion and that the nation and its values were whatever anyone wanted them to be.
A similar process has been underway for a long time in the U.S. For many years, America has been deeply invested in the same multicultural experiment of elevating other cultures by denigrating its own. Our educational, media, and entertainment establishments have subjected young people to decades of anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-Christian conditioning. As it turned out, the flip side of “tolerance for diversity” was intolerance for one’s own culture and the things that make it distinctive.
The result? As Robert Spencer observed, “people who are ashamed of their culture will not defend it.” Such people might even feel that attacks on our country are justified by our history of slavery, racism, colonialism, and imperialism. Still others will feel justified in carrying out the attacks. In England, the police are now uncovering on average one jihadist plot per day.
The situation is not yet as desperate in America, but we seem nevertheless to be generating a steady supply of homegrown terrorists. On the surface, they blend in with the culture. Major Nidal Hasan was an Army psychiatrist, the Tsarnaev brothers in Boston were into sports and school, and Mohammod Abdulazeez, the Chattanooga shooter, seemed in many respects to be the all-American boy. On the outside, they appeared to be ordinary Americans. On the inside they were more like the pod people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers—aliens with alien ambitions.
The worrisome thing is, our educational system, along with other institutions of cultural formation, seems to be on course to creating a whole nation of pod people—people with little attachment to their country or countrymen.
This detachment can take three forms. In some cases, individuals turn away from involvement in their culture to self-absorption. To assuage the loneliness of the unconnected self, they might turn to drugs or pornography or serial sex. Except for the world of pop entertainment, they are unconscious of the larger world. Like the clueless young people interviewed on the Watters’ World segment of the O’Reilly Factor, they might be unsure who the first president was, in which century the Civil War was fought, or who John Kerry is. None of that seems important to them. If a group of bearded men wearing long robes and speaking Arabic moved into the apartment above, they’d probably think, “that’s cool” and light up another joint.
The second form that the detachment takes is a transfer of allegiance from one’s own history and culture to a neo-Marxist perspective. Thanks in large part to our educational system, a growing segment of our population has come to look upon its own culture as the root of all the world’s evils. Unlike the self-absorbed detachers, they are politically engaged, but their political aims have to do with undermining traditional society and radically transforming it. The “Occupy Wall Street” movement is representative of this group.
The third group, the one that Prime Minister Cameron is primarily concerned about, is composed of those whose first loyalty is to the ummah—the worldwide community of Muslim believers. They may live in the UK, France, or the U.S., but their allegiance lies elsewhere. They may have always felt this way, or they may have undergone a conversion. The majority in this category pose no direct threat to the larger society; they simply prefer to lead their lives separate from it. These separate communities do, however, provide the soil in which the radicals take root. They are, to use another metaphor, the sea in which the jihadis swim. The radical Muslims themselves are in some ways similar to the anti-Western Westerners who repudiate the Western tradition. The radicals not only reject Western culture, they see it as evil and they want to bring it down.
Because they have the same goals—the destruction of Western and Christian civilization—the members of the second group often act as enablers of Muslim radicals. I’ve written before about the leftist-Islamist alliance—the leftist professors who support the cause of Hamas, the left-leaning foundations which finance the “Islamophobia” campaign, and the left-leaning politicians who support the Muslim Brotherhood. But sometimes the alliance goes beyond moral and financial support and manifests itself in actual violence. The best example of this are the antifa or “antifascist” gangs in Europe who use brownshirt tactics to suppress any protest against Islamization or the leftist policies—such as mass immigration—which promote Islamization. Numerous anti-Islamization rallies and marches in Europe have been broken up by much larger groups of young antifas throwing punches and sometimes bricks and bottles.
As befits two movements with global ambitions, the leftist-Islamist alliances are cropping up all over the planet. In Australia recently, an organization called Reclaim Australia held a series of rallies to protest Islamization. They were met by violent “anti-racist” counter-demonstrators, some of them wearing face coverings. Here’s an account of one such encounter in Melbourne:
I made my way onto Spring Street, where there was an even larger mob, maybe 500 or 600 people, some with megaphones… There were a few late comers or stragglers attempting to get through to the ‘Reclaim Australia’ section. It was futile. As soon as anyone in the mob identified a person as a Reclaimer, a large horde of 20 or 40 of the mob would rush to them, and in many incidents I witnessed, assault them, knock them to the ground, and kick them on the ground. It became a mob mentality. Anyone with an Australian flag had it stolen from them and was assaulted. Almost every assault I witnessed was by twenty or more on one.
So if you’re worried about the advance of global jihad, it’s not just the young Muslim browsing radical sites on the Internet that you need to worry about. You also have to worry about all those college grads who majored in Marxism and Peace Studies, and are dead set on ridding the world of “racists” and “fascists.”
By comparison, the first group of detachers—those who are mainly into themselves—seems the least dangerous of the three. That’s generally true. On the other hand, the self-absorbed sometimes become disenchanted with the pursuit of self and seek to find their identity in a larger cause. Sometimes they end up in church, sometimes in the radical left, and sometimes in radical Islam. Judging by his blog posts, the Chattanooga jihadist, Mohammod Youssuf Abdulazeez seems to have traveled this route. Having tried out drugs, drink, fast cars, and other vain pursuits, he finally found a purpose in jihad.
However, the main threat posed by those who seek constant diversion is that they are too distracted to notice the larger world and the dangers lurking in it. They are oblivious to anything outside their own pleasure zone. Thus, they can be of little help in resisting the twin threat posed by leftism and Islamism. The same can be said to a lesser degree of those we might call the semi-detached (or semi-attached, if you prefer). Such people don’t reject Western and Christian values, but they are not actively engaged in promoting or defending them. They don’t hate America, but they are too busy earning a living or raising a family to think much about existential threats to their society. Thanks to years of relentless indoctrination from the schools and the media, their links to core cultural principles are tenuous. The result is a certain passivity concerning events over which they supposedly have no control: “Ho-hum, I see there’s been another jihad attack. I hope the authorities will do something about it.”
An individual’s will to resist tyranny, whether of the leftist or Islamic variety, depends to a large extent on the strength of his attachments—particularly attachments to family, church, and country. But the liberal state does everything it can to weaken those ties. And once the ties that bind are slackened sufficiently, it’s difficult to care strongly about anything. If the current attacks on marriage, family, religion, and patriotism—up until recently the main glue of society—are as successful as the social engineers hope, there will soon be nothing left worth fighting for.
Which raises a question: What happens when the leaders of a society are themselves detached from that society? What happens, for instance, when the leaders of the U.S. government begin to see themselves not as representatives of the American people but as members of a worldwide order of global elites—a sort of non-religious “ummah”?…
epistemology says
Melanie Phillips describes is spot on but not only for Britain but all of Western Europe. I put some hope in our Eastern neighbours the memory of oppression is still there and these guys learn from our mistakes. They’re determined not to let muzzie in who’ll undermine their culture. Hope they’re stronger and defend their position against the EU administration.
t. says
”An individual’s will to resist tyranny, whether of the leftist or Islamic variety, depends to a large extent on the strength of his attachments—particularly attachments to family, church, and country. But the liberal state does everything it can to weaken those ties. And once the ties that bind are slackened sufficiently, it’s difficult to care strongly about anything. If the current attacks on marriage, family, religion, and patriotism—up until recently the main glue of society—are as successful as the social engineers hope, there will soon be nothing left worth fighting for.”
William Kilpatrick is simply brilliant in his analysis of the current state of affairs in the west and how it’s being lead to its very imminent demise.
I really enjoy reading his and Raymond Ibrahim’s analysis!
mortimer says
Chillingly accurate!
“Except for the world of pop entertainment, they (Western counter-culture) are unconscious of the larger world. Like the clueless young people interviewed on the Watters’ World segment of the O’Reilly Factor, they might be unsure who the first president was, in which century the Civil War was fought, or who John Kerry is. None of that seems important to them. If a group of bearded men wearing long robes and speaking Arabic moved into the apartment above, they’d probably think, “that’s cool” and light up another joint.”
Because the general public has no idea that jihad is a war of extermination against disbelievers, they cannot observe it or be concerned about it.
Dr. Divinity says
The “”Leftiststass”” of the world will be our downfall. It is happening right now., Please Mr.Governments wake up.
Michael Copeland says
Excellent article, thank you. A couple of points:
“Multiculturalism”, separate development, is apartheid.
“The majority pose no direct threat”. This is a judgment or assumption, or assertion, and it may well be unsafe. Islam is not defined by what a majority think or do: it is defined by its root (“radical”) texts. These mandate violence against non-muslims, and command their subjugation through the imposition of Sharia.
EYESOPEN says
Excellent point Michael. You are 100% correct; and too many people seem to forget this. Just as all Germans were not Nazis between 1936 and 1945, it was nevertheless the Nazis who dictated policy for Germany and started their march of conquest – first Austria, then the Sudentenland, and then half of Poland.
Barry says
Don’t forget how that ended up for them. And has done for similar deranged thinkers throughout history.And will do so again for the presnt day bunch of ignorant fools. If it doesn’t , the world is finished. As , to go down their path , leaves nothing for anyone.
Jaladhi says
It is as simple as this: multi-culturalism works if Muslims are not in the mix. Its only the Muslims who cannot live with anybody let alone themselves. Exclude Muslims fro your country and your country can live happily thereafter – well almost!!
Charli Main says
Islam is the antithesis of multiculturism and diversity. There is NO multiculturism and diversity in Islam, yet both are constantly blamed for the actions and behaviour of the Muslims infesting Europe, the USA and elsewhere.
I don´t see any multiculti Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Animists, atheists or Jews causing any problems in Europe or elsewhere.
sinantara says
The Majelis Ulama Indonesia a few years back issued an official fatwa, that multiculturalism, liberalism and pluralism (in Islam) is against Islam. Immediately a mob tried to enforce this fatwa by moving against the headquarters of the JIL (Liberal Islamic Network). So liberalism in the west means tolerance against Islam, and in a country like Indonesia, it is suspect because it means tolerance against non Muslims. Or we need a new set of terms–the right in Indonesia doesn’t mean these who are against Islam but radical Islam which is against the left… But political and cultural trends have their own momentum and paradigm change is a process. Madness will run its course until it is almost too late–up till now. What if Hitler had bomb first and didn’t waste his V2’s and ME-262’s on London?
John Scott says
Thanks for the comments, and the insight.
I have lived in Toronto for the last 20 years, and Toronto is the most multi-cultural city in the world.
Within reason, in a limited space, I totally support the idea of a multi-cultural city. Here, I would like to thank all the immigrants that have made Toronto the great city that it is. That includes Muslims.
That said, the only thing that really worries me is Islam.
I do not mean to insult or offend, but with regards to multiculturalism & immigration, Islam is the greatest problem.
I am not against the average Muslim, Arab, or, person from the Middle East.
That said, Islam is a real problem in our society, in the 21st century.
Here, I invite further comment and insight from others.
John in Toronto
ECAW says
John – since you invite comments, it seems clear to me that the numbers are important. As the percentage of Muslims in any society grow there is a tendency for Muslims to become decidedly unicultural thus spoiling the multicultural party for everyone.
Why? It follows the example of Mohammed and his followers. As a powerless minority in Mecca he left punishing the unbelievers to Allah. Then he moved to Medina, teamed up with two of the meanest gangs (tribes) in town and insinuated himself into the society with the benign face of religion masking the supremacist agenda which relied on intimidation and outright violence – just as we see in the West, to varying degrees according to the percentage of Muslims in the various populations. In Britain (5% Muslim), where things are pretty bad, we look at France (10% Muslim) to see our future. There, 7,000 troops are permanently stationed on the streets to protect one group of French citizens (Jews) from another (Muslims).
Here is a well known view on the subject from Peter Hammond which you may find at least thought provoking:
http://www.examiner.com/article/as-muslim-population-grows-what-can-happen-to-a-society
John Anthony Duarte Scott says
Thank you, that was a very interesting article.
Many people are the illusion that Islam is just a simple religion. That’s not the truth.
Islam is also a political system, and, has been, from it’s inception, 1400 years ago.
To the world, here is what is happening in Canada:
* An attempt to install Sharia law, back in 2005.
* A man in a wheelchair, denied municipal-funded housing, because he is not Muslim, 2015.
* The formation of the Islamic Party of Canada, 2015.
etc.
In all honesty, as a Canadian, I do not hate Muslims. A Muslim lady was begging for food outside the local supermarket, a mother of 3, and, I felt bad that I did not have the extra cash to simply buy her 6 pounds of rice.
That said, I must be honest with people: Islam is a religion that teaches killing, wife-beating, amputation, crucifixion, segregation, etc. My Mom says that it is against human rights.
All of the above is bad enough, but, when Islam seeks to infiltrate our political and legal systems, then it is a serious problem.
Under Sharia, legally, a woman is worth 1/2 that of a man, both in terms of inheritance and testimony.
Under Sharia, all Jews & Christians must pay a tax to Islam.
According to my understanding of the Quran, polytheists/idolators/pagans have no status. They are given 2 choices: Death or conversion.
As a Canadian, I strongly stand against this theocratic ideology, and, it’s installation into the society of Canada.
As a Canadian, I am simply asking fellow Canadians for help. Please, learn what is going on, and help to defend our country. I do not ever want to see any Canadian living under Sharia law, ever.
To non-Canadians, I apologize for the Canadian emphasis in this post.
I am just trying to provide my insight and experience as to what is happening in Canada, “news from the ground”, so to speak.
I fully recognize that other countries face a similar problem.
In very simple words, the problem is Islam.
John of Canada
EYESOPEN says
Sorry Jaladhi. “Multi-culturalism” does NOT work – anywhere! There are cultures that just plain suck; and come nowhere near the freedom and prosperity that societies based upon the Judeo-Christian culture have given to many nations of this world. All you need to do is to look around the world to understand the truth of this. And then, when the once-dominant Judeo-Christian culture is abandoned, you get what you are seeing throughout most of Europe – and, sadly, even here in the U.S.
Green Infidel says
True. In my town in central England, where I work and live there are many continental Europeans, Indians, South Americans and Africans. No problems at all – on the contrary, we’re all quite friendly to each other. But attitudes to Muslims can be quite different. Some freely admit they don’t want Muslims on their street, while a teacher I know says at her school there is a problem with “racism from Pakistani students”.
In short, as another comment says, the degree to which multiculturalism works can strongly depend on the cultures involved in the “melting pot”. In countries such as Britain, most migrants are not Muslim or aggressive and so the experience is good. In France, with most migrants from North Africa or Senegal, it’s not so good. Meanwhile in Germany, most migrants are Muslim too – but Germans are too absorbed by feeling guilt for their (admittedly terrible) recent history, and so can’t bring themselves to expressing opposition to Islamisation (barring a few hundred Pegida supporters).
jayell says
When people start talking about ‘melting pots’ it doesn’t go down too well in thew UK, since the UK was never really was a ‘melting pot’ – at least not for about the last 900 years. Anything the UK achieved was as a stable North-Western European society with a clear cultural identity. We never saw our role in the world as a ‘menlting pot’, and most of us don’t like the idea since we felt much happier, safer and were more productive the way we were before.
Westman says
” What happens when the leaders of a society are themselves detached from that society? What happens, for instance, when the leaders of the U.S. government begin to see themselves not as representatives of the American people but as members of a worldwide order of global elites—a sort of non-religious “ummah”?…”
That was on full display as world leaders “marched” in Paris after the Charlie Hebdo murders. It was an image with absolutely no substance, no private meeting of the group to find solutions to Islamic violence, no statement approved by all about international cooperation by Western leaders, no identifying of Islamic doctrine that supported the murders, and they had known Islamic jihad sympathizers holding their hands. They marched to defuse a backlash; not to find solutions. Charlie Hebdo’s surrender is exactly what they wanted.
There is no question that today’s Western “leaders” consider themselves players on the world stage, determining the drama, while the citizens are in the audience watching the actors play up and wink to those few who bought the best seats.
Truth Seeker says
Multiculturalism in Western Countries and in Us etc is something like, Lay Man’s attempt to Lift out the Moon from the Well. What is that? This is a story.
One Layman on full moon day looked at his well. He found, the Image of Moon in Water. He felt, Moon fell into the Well and to be lifted up. He brought a long chain and made Vain Attempts.
Multiculturalism Will Never be Achieved with Jihadi Migrants. On the other hand they will Swallow the Host Country.
It is not an Easy Task to come out of the present Situation, because, Jihadi Trojan Horses Infiltrated in the Administration will Mislead the Rulers.
Unless they are pushed out, 1st, sinking of Western Nations and US can’t be prevented.
Joseph says
That MUST be a fly on the right side of his face because this guy is a real P.O.S.
abad says
Islam has nothing to do with multi-culturalism.
Islam is a religion.
There is a huge difference here – and why all these previously homogeneous western European nations have decided to embrace this multi-culturalism “all cultures are equal” BS is beyond me.
Then they wonder why they suffer a national identity crisis.
Bezelel says
” What happens when the leaders of a society are themselves detached from that society? What happens, for instance, when the leaders of the U.S. government begin to see themselves not as representatives of the American people but as members of a worldwide order of global elites—a sort of non-religious “ummah”?…”
This question reminds me of hussein obola skipping the Paris march after the Hebdo murders and instead sending kerry with a song and dance routine. Bizarre, surreal, just down right odd as hell. Of course the FBI putting counter jihadists on the undesirable list, On and on. The reference point for sanity has been drop kicked into a cess pool and the obamazombies attack anyone who tries to retrieve it.
Good is not helpless and evil is self destructive.
ECAW says
Excellent article.
Sounds like the various writers quoted above are talking about different forms of anomie:
“Anomie is a “condition in which society provides little moral guidance to individuals”. It is the breakdown of social bonds between an individual and the community….resulting in fragmentation of social identity and rejection of self-regulatory values. It was popularized by French sociologist Émile Durkheim in his influential book Suicide (1897).”
and
“For Durkheim, anomie arises more generally from a mismatch between personal or group standards and wider social standards, or from the lack of a social ethic, which produces moral deregulation and an absence of legitimate aspirations.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie
Durkheim used the concept to explain individual physical suicide but we could broaden the idea to the various forms of psychological or spiritual suicide we see all around us – escapist (trashy) culture, drugs, conversion to the death cult etc.
Perhaps also to the societal suicide of pandering to a creed which wishes only harm to the host society.
If sociologists really accepted the importance of “the ties that bind us” you would think that they should be the first to warn us about their erosion. But they don’t. When did you last hear of a sociologist trying to build up society rather than debunk it? Why is that? Well, when I went to university, first year sociology consisted of Durkheim, Weber and Marx – and the first of these was Marx, with both students and lecturers.
EYESOPEN says
Now THAT’S a frightening revelation.
sinantara says
yes. multiculturalism is a product of western and christian civilization that is obsessed with The Other. It is an outgrowth of political correctness which I see as radical Christianity that has followed Marx by throwing God overboard being not Christian enough. It is a result of retro-projecting society on God. Like a traditional family with a father mother and child signifies a structure, hence a hierarchy, hence a patriarchy and authority, hence fascism, God the father is fascist and non existent. As Bertrand Russell points out, Marx, appalled by the depredations of the industrial revolution blamed Christian society to fail goodness, hence, God failed society, hence there should be something better than God–like dialectical materialism. PC MC is a reaction against two WWs and the Gulag Archipelago. And ironically, the failure of western imperialism to keep the west’s imperiums. And, the failure of political Marxism. Now enters Islam at a period of spiritual malaise… Twice lucky, if the Romans and Sassanids had not exhausted each other… And Muslims have been quick to join the game from the right angle, as victims… So what then should be done? Pull back the pendulum, ye conservatives of the family value ilk, by persevering. It now comes down to a good agenda, being politically clever and creative, culturally attractive… I myself am still working with and in Islam, because and I said this before on this forum, I have no choice. Call it impossible to reform Islam, the impossible should be done. And Egyptian Muslims are not the only ones angry at Obama…
Angemon says
And to do so they discriminate against a race and act the same as fascists did.
sinantara says
four feet good, two feet bad! four feet good. two feet bad!
EYESOPEN says
Which raises a question: What happens when the leaders of a society are themselves detached from that society? What happens, for instance, when the leaders of the U.S. government begin to see themselves not as representatives of the American people but as members of a worldwide order of global elites—a sort of non-religious “ummah”?…
An excellent question Mr. Sidway. I would say that we are witnessing that very thing here in the United States right now.
Jay Boo says
What is the big deal about the Confederate Battle Flag?
OK, Maybe having it on a public building is debatable, but why is the Left foaming at the mouth with delight at denigrating it and assigning one negative PC message against it?
It is not about the flag.
The real message is about white Southerners in general. They wish to extrapolate and assign a negative connotation to everything to do with every white Southerner in order to feel good about themselves while demonizing people of a certain heritage and racial background – white Southerners. They have Neil Young disease.
These multicultural ‘visionaries’ will drool over individual cultural identity as long as it fits their narrative. They hope to divide everyone else against one another.
swampbubbles says
The Confederate flag banishments may just be the first in a long line of cultural ‘cleansings’. In Israel what is happening these days, for one example, is that the Star of David (on ambulances, even) has become offensive to that certain segment of society, as are Christian crosses. The Islamic crescent, however, is never considered an offensive symbol to any of this perpetually offended, multicultural segment of society.
John Scott says
This is the possible future Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/trudeau.jpg
Multi-culturalism, within reason, sure, why not?
1,000,000 more Muslims in the space of a few years, with the inevitable attempts to install Sharia law in Canada?
As a Canadian, I sure hope not! I am very worried for the future of our country and our legal systems.
John from Canada
JRH says
I’m more worried about Mulcair becoming PM-he quite likely has a better chance of being elected than Trudeau. He also panders to Muslims.
For instance: http://pamelageller.com/2015/08/photo-leftist-canadian-prime-minister-candidate-thomas-mulclair-with-islamic-supremacist-jew-hating-jihad-supporter-nazih-khataba.html/
And this speech: http://www.ndp.ca/news/speech-tom-mulcair-isna-mosque-mississauga-ontario
John Scott says
JRH, thank you for the links.
These links give further insight to Canadians.
I encourage ALL Canadians to vote, and, moreso, to send your best words to our elected officials, including our Prime Minister.
To vote is very important: however, the ability to send a strong letter, from your heart, with your best words…
In theory, I think that this is more important than the vote.
John of Canada
Arthur says
This is a nice article.
The U.S. is composed of one of the most culturally diverse populations in the world: it is a true melting pot. In the beginning it may have been predominantly Christian immigrants with varied interpretations of how to live in closed communities, but for decades Buddhists, Hindus, etc. have lived in harmony while maintaining their cultural identities.
Multiculturalism is fine if the ‘cultures’ share common values: earn your living, respect other people (Golden Rule), obey laws of the land, etc. It’s simply that Islam doesn’t share these same values and is disingenuous about that fact. These values are shared by most cultures–Islam is unusual in this regard.
Any time people start talking about cultures, they should be redirected to talk about values. Slavery, sex with children, vigilante killing, supremacism are all values that the people of the United States have rejected. Most people in the U.S. don’t care how you dress, what your native language is, what color your skin is, or how you pray as long as you share the same fundamental values.
Brigitte Gabriel’s description of people who didn’t matter in the fight over values in history would seem to echo the concern in this article over people who are not participating in our current communities. These people really don’t matter–until they vote. Let’s face it, this fight is up to those of us who know the score and care about the outcome.
Enfant Terrible says
The U.S is no longer a melting pot. It is a raced-obsessed society that includes constant attacks on individuals and groups who espouse values different than that od the left, The divisive issues of legal and illegal immigration, the definition of marriage, gender identity, the constant attacks and denigrations of institutions and groups associated with Western civilization, the cover-up/ignoring of racially-motivated black-on-white crime, and white privilege are all endemic phenomena belying the existence of a melting pot, an expression now identified as a micro-aggression. The leftist liberal elites reign with acquiescence from the hackneyed “mainstream” right elite.
Moshe Akiva says
It is quite horrible and tells all about the effectiveness of brainwashing as well as apathy that the minority outnumbers the majority on the streets, Something is fucked up.
Betty says
THIS IS ONE OF THE BEST ARTICLES I HAVE READ IN SOME TIME. THANK YOU.
Enfant Terrible says
The Third Group of the Detached- “The majority in this category pose no direct threat to the larger society; they simply prefer to lead their lives separate from it. These separate communities do, however, provide the soil in which the radicals take root.” – As inhabitants of “No-go Zones” in European countries, this category is a potent growing threat to national and local sovereignty.