• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Muslim cleric who issued fatwa permitting WMD pledges allegiance to Islamic State

Aug 25, 2015 10:57 pm By Robert Spencer

Nasser bin Hamad al-Fahd

“I advise you to join, all of you, the Islamic State and to pledge allegiance to its leader, Amir al-Mumineen Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – may Allah protect him – and fight under his banner. It is the state that raised the banner of Islam, and established Tawhid, and destroyed the idols, and implemented the Sharia. Allah has purified it from implementing man-made laws, from standing with the Disbelievers, and from supporting the Tawaghit, and has protected it from innovations, and misleading paths.”

How did this cleric become such a Misunderstander of Islam? Maybe John Kerry or David Cameron could jet over to Saudi Arabia and explain the true, peaceful Islam to him.

“Saudi Cleric Who Issued Fatwa on WMD Permissibility Pledges Allegiance to ISIS,” by Bridget Johnson, PJ Media, August 25, 2015:

A prominent Saudi cleric and ally of Osama bin Laden who issued a 2003 fatwa permitting the use of weapons of mass destruction in jihad has pledged his allegiance to the Islamic State.

Nasser bin Hamad al-Fahd is behind bars in Saudi Arabia, but his direction for squabbling Muslim factions to unite behind Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as caliph could have significant reach — along with the fresh distribution of his fatwas on social media networks.

“I advise you to join, all of you, the Islamic State and to pledge allegiance to its leader, Amir al-Mumineen Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – may Allah protect him – and fight under his banner,” al-Fahd wrote. “It is the state that raised the banner of Islam, and established Tawhid, and destroyed the idols, and implemented the Sharia. Allah has purified it from implementing man-made laws, from standing with the Disbelievers, and from supporting the Tawaghit, and has protected it from innovations, and misleading paths.”

He acknowledged that ISIS has made mistakes, but they should be forgiven since they’re under such pressure all the time.

“As to those who keep counting its mistakes, we say: Nobody is exempt from mistakes, and whatever the time in history, and however pure you might be. All sons of Adam make mistakes, and exemption from mistakes is only for the Prophets,” al-Fahd wrote.

“…What could we say about this blessed State? It has just emerged, still lacking capabilities, besieged, attacked from every side, arrows pointing to it from all around, its been defamed, slandered by all imaginable means, nations from all over the world agreed to fight it, and the scholars of the Tawaghit, the scholars of shame, the callers to falsehood, the mules of the sultans in every country have defamed and slandered it, and lied about it lies we have never seen in history. So how could they not make mistakes when they are in this situation?”

Some al-Nusra supporters online were claiming that the signature on the letter was forged, sparking a back-and-forth on Twitter between ISIS and al-Nusra/al-Qaeda supporters.

But needless to say, ISIS backers celebrated the news — and trumpeted his old fatwas for jihadis to catch up on.

In his 2003 WMD fatwa, al-Fahd ruled, “If the infidels can be repelled from the Muslims only by using such weapons, their use is permissible, even if you kill them without exception and destroy their tillage and stock.”

The international banning of certain types of weapons, he stressed, has no meaning under Islamic law. Under the Quran, he said, “One kills in a good manner only when one can. If those engaged in jihad cannot do so, for example when they are forced to bomb, destroy, burn, or flood, it is permissible.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Saudi Arabia Tagged With: Nasser bin Hamad al-Fahd


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Dave J says

    Aug 25, 2015 at 11:16 pm

    It’s like a time machine, we are dealing with the most primitive caveman savage barbarians as can be imagined.

    Civilization is going to have to decide whether to submit or resist. Like on the high speed train shoot out, are you going to hunker and hide or are you going to roll and do your best for the sake of truth and justice?

    • Huck Folder says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 1:51 am

      “…exemption from mistakes is only for the Prophets…”

      ‘Prophets’ are exempt from mistakes?
      So prophets make mistakes?
      And mo was a ‘prophet’ – he made mistakes?

      But “The BoH™” tells you that mo was perfect.
      And “The BoH™” itself MUST be perfect,
      because mo wrote it, and IT says so.

      I’m all confused.

      Is this ‘cleric’ practicing bida?

      • Jack Diamond says

        Aug 26, 2015 at 2:12 am

        Well, there’s this time Satan put his words into Muhammad’s mouth…

    • Saleem Smith says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 2:04 am

      The religion of Islam forces Muslims to become liars and deceivers.

      But the Saudi Cleric in the article is not a liar or a deceiver.

      He is a brain-washed TRUE BELIEVER who thinks that Islam is a perfect and good thing! He is incapable of understanding that the Quran and the hadith and Muhammad’s behavior are full of evil and hatred and violence.

      We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is an exceptionally dangerous and harmful fraud.

      Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

      “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

      The statement continues,

      Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

      • bill walker says

        Aug 27, 2015 at 2:55 am

        Mohammad was the best argument for abortion that ever existed.

    • Georg says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 5:16 am

      It’s them or us and we’re not going anywhere, so batten down the hatches. How, exactly, does this imbecile manage to communicate his filth from prison? Why does the world tolerate it? Is he wearing a tablecloth?

      On the other hand, he seems rather A. Chowder-esque in his ability to distill the Islamic message for all to see.

    • Dr. Divinity says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 1:56 pm

      There is going to have to come a time when the worry of collateral damage must be put aside for the better good. Bring out the B-52’s with carpet and fire bombs. Warn them ,if the thought of mass destruction really is a problem,then destroy any and all stronghold’s and keep doing this city after city till there’s nothing left but tent city in the desert This may sound harsh and sickening but what is the alternative? Are we just to continue letting them “”chip away”” at us or finally take action????

  2. Mark says

    Aug 25, 2015 at 11:42 pm

    I ask why don’t UN make a safe place in the country’s were the people are running from? Why do we let them come here and there to hide? Hmm just thinking…
    When islam decides to use nukes which they will we will already have the 5th column in most of the world so I ask what will our leaders do then to protect our country’s. I fear nothing will happen because of the fear that they will be next due to the fact of a 5th column waiting the command just down the street from them.
    The UN is now run by muslim country’s so lets close our boarders and move the UN to the EU
    The only smart move

  3. mortimer says

    Aug 25, 2015 at 11:50 pm

    Nasser bin Hamad al-Fahd is a normal Salafist. Salafism is the religion of Saudi Arabia. His only fault is that he doesn’t put the House of Saud before Caliph Al Baghdadi.

    • Georg says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 5:35 am

      Right on. Thanks for the elegant logic– it’s nice to see in this time of feverish dissimulation.

  4. Rob says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 12:36 am

    Can’t wait until the Yazidis put Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on trial.
    I’m not in favour of capital punishment but for this guy I’ll make an exception and the slower and more agonising – the better!

    • Jerry says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 8:21 am

      Justice will be best served if Yazidi and Kurd female freedom fighters capture Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and separate his rabid head from his filthy torso.

  5. Jack Diamond says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 1:15 am

    Only fair, since ISIS has been invoking him all this time in their manifestos to sanction the mass murder of Americans, Canadians, and Europeans (those “you will not be safe, even in your own bedrooms while you sleep”manifestos). The fatwa originated when jihadis wrote al-Fahd for his illustrious opinion on the use of WMD. Walid Shoebat once did a translation from the full 26-page document, which justifies the annihilation of the United States. A quick recap:

    Al-Fahd mentions a doctrine called Jihad-u-Dafi’ (Repulse Jihad) and says in the introduction: “if the infidels cannot be repulsed from the Muslims except by resorting to using such weapons, then it may be used even if it killed and wiped them out completely including decimating their crops and their descendants. I will include the details in my letter I mentioned. Therefore the question is asked and the answer is given and the matter is closed and concluded.”

    The fatwa permits and sanctions the indiscriminate murder of (at least) ten million Americans:
    “The issue to hit with these weapons [mass destruction] is permissible without mentioning the evidence of the second section the following (evidence of general legality); because Allah Almighty says “to punish in similar fashion as you were afflicted”, and the Almighty says “Attack who attacks you in similar ways as you were attacked,” and the Almighty says “Pay evil with evil,” so the observer sees American aggression on Muslims and their lands during the past decades concludes the permission to use aggression with reciprocity only as has been collected by some of the brothers the number of dead from amongst the Muslims with their weapons of direct and indirect, methods to bring the number close to ten million. And as for the lands that [America] burned with their bombs and their explosives and rockets not one can enumerate except Allah, and whatever else happened in Afghanistan and Iraq, and this is what caused the wars on many of the Muslims causing homelessness. So if bomb is launched at them that will kill ten million of them, and it will burn their land as much as they burned the Muslim lands this is therefore permissible without the need to mention any other evidence, but other evidence may be needed if we are to perish of them more than this number!”

    It describes Tabyeet, another term from Islamic fiqh. He quotes Al-Bahutti from his work Kashf Al-Qina’ (Removing The Veil) #3/49:

    “And so it is allowed to throw at them, that is the Kafirs [unbelievers] with fire, snakes, scorpions while using the catapults. It is also permissible to smoke them, open water on them in order to drown them, destroy their buildings on top of them. Since in the meaning of Tabyeet is that if you kill, do it well …And it is permissible to kill them therefore even if amongst them are women and children since this is included in Tabyeet“ {If you kill do it well, even if there are women and children}.

    Another legal authority, Al-Sarkhasi #4111/1:

    “Sarkhasi said, quoting Muhammad ibn al-Hasan in his “The Explanation of the Major Hadith” #4111/1:
    He said: “There is nothing wrong for Muslims to burn the infidels fortresses with fire, or to drown them with water and poison them and cut off their water, and to make their water bitter by pouring blood and menstrual blood and poison until they spoil it for them because we were ordered to belittle them and to break their unity.” It also states even Muslim blood is permissible to shed if they live in the United States.

    There you have it. It’s official. It’s worship.

    This obviously uneducated “misunderstander of Islam” studied at Imam University’s College of Shari’a in Riyadh and was made the dean of the College of Da’wa at Umm Al-Qura University in Mecca.

    • Georg says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 5:46 am

      Thanks for informing us of his charming credentials. I’d love for a Western Islamophole to go through explaining all this. If the KSA is not Islamic, what is? Of course IS is not, they tell us…

  6. Will says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 4:27 am

    Just imagine retargeting the first Iranian nuke to drop on his head. Or would it have to be retargeted? As we all know Shiites don’t exactly like the Saudis anyway and the excuse would be that: “the Zionist pigs pushed it off target”. Sounds too good to be true.

    Just love how the MSM and western leaders(?) quietly ignore this sort of thing. I do hope that they can all be put on trial in the future for the treason they are actively committing now.

  7. duh_swami says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 6:46 am

    Under the Quran, he said, “One kills in a good manner only when one can. If those engaged in jihad cannot do so, for example when they are forced to bomb, destroy, burn, or flood, it is permissible.”…

    Yes, they are ‘forced’ to murder..in the most vile and evil ways imaginable…They can’t help it, Allah is ‘making’ them do it…Once you accept Allah as your personal savior, you musty do exactly as directed in Quran and the examples of Mahound, and sharia, otherwise you will die a hypocrite and miss out on the virgins. If this sounds evil, it’s because it is…

  8. baucent says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 6:52 am

    Sooner all later al-Baghdadi will meet his firey fate as a drone get’s lucky. Inshallah.

    • mortimer says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 9:00 am

      Another caliph will be promoted from the ranks.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 1:41 pm

      Sooner all later al-Baghdadi…

      Hey watch it. A month or so ago he renamed himself Caliph Ibrahim. The civilized thing to do is to have the respect to call a foreign leader by his preferred name. This is especially true for Caliph Ibrahim given all he’s going through:

      He acknowledged that ISIS has made mistakes, but they should be forgiven since they’re under such pressure all the time.

      He admits his mistakes and he is sacrificing his personal well being on behalf of God. That is the Caliph Ibrahim I know. Praise Allah.

  9. Kim Bruce says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 7:42 am

    Sheesh! Between watching planned Parenthood videos and reading this crap I just scratch my head in wonderment as to where this world is headed?

    • Steph says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 10:17 pm

      Kim Bruce, by the time your planned kids get to adulthood these muslim idiots are going to have the world in a huge mess, I worry about my kids and they are in their early 20’s …

      look at what the rise of this brutality has been in the past 5 years, (not even that really) I horror as to where it will be in the next 20, especially if the politicians continue to open the doors, pay the social welfare and generally ignore the reality ……

  10. Matthieu Baudin says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 7:44 am

    Nasser bin Hamad al-Fahd can rot in prison, hopefully for a very long time. But how much does his message, his call for international Jihad, differ from so many other traditional deranged drum beats?

  11. David Quilty says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 8:37 am

    Well at least we are all safe from Curt Schilling…

  12. Angemon says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 10:22 am

    Some al-Nusra supporters online were claiming that the signature on the letter was forged, sparking a back-and-forth on Twitter between ISIS and al-Nusra/al-Qaeda supporters.

    The cleric was bin Laden’s ally. Al-Qaeda and ISIS differ in methodology, not in goals.

  13. Jack Diamond says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 10:50 am

    There’s a lot of noise about the “rules” of jihad used to deny legitimacy to the likes of Al Qaeda and ISIS because of their brutality and wanton destruction. Truth is the “rules” are more like suggestions since there are no consequences for their breach, and their meaning, like most things Islam, are not what one thinks. Not only can women and children “of the polytheists” be killed if they are among them, they are definitely to be killed if seen to fight the Muslims in word or deed. The reason women and not children were not to be killed had more to do with their value as property– to sell or rape or enslave. As Ibn Taymiyyah said about war: “women, children, monks, old people, the blind, the handicapped…they shall not be killed unless they actually fight with words (propaganda) and acts (spying or assisting in warfare). Some (jurists) are of the opinion that all of them may be killed, on the mere ground that they are unbelievers, but they make an exception for women and children (as) they constitute property for Muslims.”

    Tabari and Ibn Ishaq relate how Muhammad sent his solders to raid the tribe Banu Fazara, their leader was an old woman, Umm Qirfa. They killed her by putting a rope to her two legs and tying them to two camels and driving the camels in different directions until she was torn in two. ISIS is still trying to catch up with Muhammad and his companions in the barbaric sweepstakes. Abu Bakr’s orders to the brutal Khalid bin al-Walid against the Bani Hanifah was “put the captives among them to the sword and strike terror among them by killing and burn them by fire.” Forget the Geneva Convention, et al.

    Andrew Bostom’s piece on the legitimacy of terror in jihad war (beginning with Muhammad’s “I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy” and Qur’an 8:67 “it is not for a prophet to have captives until he has made a great slaughter in the land”) quotes a 14th century Grenadan scholar Ibn Hudayl: “it is permissible to set fire to the lands of the enemy, his stores of grain, his beasts of burden–if it is not possible for Muslims to take possession of them–as well as to cut down his trees, to raze his cities, in a word, to do everything that might ruin and discourage him (being) suited to hastening the Islamization of that enemy or to weakening him.”

    A 17th century scholar al-Maqqari on how the panic created by the Arabs aided conquest “Allah thus installed such fear among the infidels that they did not dare to go and fight the conquerors, they only approach them as supplicants and beg for peace.” The history of jihad is not one of restraint, it is the “sword without leniency”(Caliph Umar). A black book of slaughter, pillaging, plundering, enslavement, and vicious cruelty lovingly recounted in every last detail by Islam’s historians.

    “Muslim historians recorded in detail the number of infidels slaughtered, or enslaved and deported, the cities, villages, and infidel religious sites which were sacked and pillaged, and the lands, treasure, and movable goods seized…This sanctioned, but wanton destruction resulted, specifically in: the merciless slaughter of non-combatants, including women and children; massive destruction of non-Muslim houses of worship and religious shrines—Christian churches, Jewish synagogues, and Zoroastrian, Hindu, and Buddhist temples and idols; and the burning of harvest crops and massive uprooting of agricultural production systems, leading to famine.”
    http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2014/09/11/911-and-jihad-terror-a-legacy-of-over-13-centuries-not-13-years/

    These are the role models for al-Fahd and al- Baghdadi.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 1:35 pm

      Allah thus installed such fear among the infidels that they did not dare to go and fight the conquerors, they only approach them as supplicants and beg for peace.

      Sounds like Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande or David Cameron. My country the United States is spared this ignominy cuz our leader studied in a madrasas during his youth in his homeland Indonesia, the world’s most populous Moslem nation. In other words, Prez Barack Hussein is supplicant not cuz he’s skeert but because he sympathizes with them, and barely conceals it.

  14. john spielman says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 11:05 am

    i find it funny that” allah protects it (isis) from .. innovations”…! explains the lack of scholarly persuits in islamic nations

    • Steph says

      Aug 26, 2015 at 10:40 pm

      I think the reason for lack of scholarly persuits in islamic nations is, to stop any of the muslims using their brains to see life outside their cocoon,
      I find it interesting they want everyone to revert back to the 7th centuary but use the modern tools, trucks, guns, communications etc.. this must be very unislamic …

      Muslims want to deny everyone modern education, but get out the manual for their new cell phone, they predict world peace but everyone has a kelishnicoff (spelling), I’m sure Alla couldn’t see the Toyota’s and the fuel distribution network ..

      Can you imagine “the modern decree of Alla” ……. “Go forth mohamid, you have my blessing, select your infidel prize from the internet, hold her at gunpoint and rape her in the back seat of your truck, no condoms allowed .. “

  15. Jay Boo says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 12:22 pm

    Muhammad issued a fatwa to Allah demanding that Allah order Muhammad to boink his beautiful daughter-in-law to which Muhammad replied, “Well OK, but only because you insist”

  16. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Aug 26, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    This guy is different. Usually we see imams and scheiks and mullahs with opaque dark brown eyes, but this imam’s eyes are alive, and it may be the lighting of the photo, but it looks like he’s standing in the wash of divine light shining down upon him from the Allah Islam Porno Heaven, much as it did for the ex-kidnapper ex-President of Persia Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I see the light, it’s all so obvious.

    Allah has purified it from implementing man-made laws…

    Light or no light, divine or otherwise, I’m starting to suspect that maybe all this Islamization in America, Canada, Germany, France, Oz, Spain, Italy, Sweden-Norway-Denmark, Holland, Belgium and many other places is not gonna work out so well.

    I’m beginning to suspect that maybe the presence of throngs of Unicorns among us may end up replacing democracy with religious dictatorships. Could be.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.