• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Robert Spencer, PJ Media: Islamic texts justify sex slavery

Aug 14, 2015 6:39 pm By Robert Spencer

isisslavesOver at PJ Media today I discuss the justifications for sex slavery that are unfortunately found in Islamic texts:

“He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God. … He said that raping me is his prayer to God.”

These extraordinary statements come from girls who were kept as sex slaves by jihadis of the Islamic State, as reported in a lengthy and revealing New York Times piece that was published Thursday.

Not only does the piece illustrate the horrifying ordeal that Yazidi and other non-Muslim women endure at the hands of the Islamic State when they are forced into sexual slavery, but — most surprisingly — the article explains in detail how these monsters believe they are pleasing their bloodthirsty god by destroying these girls.

Reported the Times’ Rukmini Callimachi:

In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.

Both before and after he raped her, he prostrated himself in Islamic prayer:

“He told me,” the girl recounted, “that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God.”

This was no isolated incident. A fifteen-year-old girl who had been forced into sex slavery recalled:

“He kept telling me this is ibadah” – that is, worship of Allah. “He said that raping me is his prayer to God. I said to him, ‘What you’re doing to me is wrong, and it will not bring you closer to God.’ And he said, ‘No, it’s allowed. It’s halal.’”

All this is reminiscent of Hamas’ statement:

“Killing Jews is worship that draws us closer to God.”

What kind of god is this?

What kind of moral blindness has overtaken non-Muslim leaders? They sit and drink tea and “dialogue” with Muslim clerics while being careful to avoid mention of anything like this — if they’re even aware of it at all — much less ask them what they’re doing to combat within Muslim communities the theological basis for sex slavery.

It must be faced: in Islamic texts and teachings, such a theological basis manifestly exists.

The Times quotes Kecia Ali, an academic Islamic apologist at Boston University:

In the milieu in which the Quran arose, there was a widespread practice of men having sexual relationships with unfree women.

“Unfree women”: for some reason, Ali doesn’t want to say the word “slave.” She goes on to claim:

[I]t wasn’t a particular religious institution. It was just how people did things.

However — and surprisingly, considering the track record — the Times had the integrity to cite Cole Bunzel of Princeton University. The article noted that Bunzel points out:

[There are] numerous references to the phrase “Those your right hand possesses” in the Quran, which for centuries has been interpreted to mean female slaves. He also points to the corpus of Islamic jurisprudence, which continues into the modern era and which he says includes detailed rules for the treatment of slaves.

…

There is a great deal of scripture that sanctions slavery. You can argue that it is no longer relevant and has fallen into abeyance. ISIS would argue that these institutions need to be revived, because that is what the Prophet and his companions did.

Bunzel is right: the seizure of infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an.

According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says:

O Prophet! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war (33:50).

Qur’an 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls:

The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or those whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame. (Qur’an 23:1-6)…

Read the rest here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), slavery Tagged With: sex slaves, Yazidis


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Goat Pimp says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 6:56 pm

    Very timely article Robert.

    The news just broke that Kayla Mueller was raped and used as a sex slave by Al Baghdadi. http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/kayla-mueller-was-raped-isis-leader-family-told-n410171

    How much more of this do we have to take?

    • KrazyKafir says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 7:42 pm

      I suspect it will take many millions more victims of Islamic Jihad who will have to pay the price before the world finds the courage to face the truth about this inherently evil ideology.

      • PRCS says

        Aug 14, 2015 at 7:56 pm

        Thank you for the link, but I’m not sure why he would have “married” her when Qur’an gives Muslim men specific “divine” authority to rape the sex slaves “their right hands posses”.

        • PRCS says

          Aug 14, 2015 at 8:00 pm

          Sorry; meant for Goat Pimp.

      • Shane says

        Aug 15, 2015 at 9:59 am

        Obama will not do what is necessary to destroy his creation, ISIS, and neither will Shillary, if we are foolish enough to elect her.

        • Spartacus says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 10:21 am

          Wrong O Shane.
          ISIS was created by George Walker Bush and Dick Cheney, then nourished by John McCain and Lindsey Grahm.
          They are now mentored by the U.S. State Department, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
          It “takes a village” to raise a Muslim terrorist organization.

        • jihad3tracker says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 11:45 am

          Hello Shane — Shillary’s electability has taken a huge dive because of her private server use for (at least, currently known) two top-secret emails. There will be a slow drip of blood from her seditious body — metaphorically speaking — as more news comes about this.

          And a national security breach like the one she committed is going to be relentlessly mentioned by Repubs and her Dem rivals. Candidate Jim Webb has a very strong defense background, and there might be one or two more Dems who get into the race.

    • jihad3tracker says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 9:03 pm

      **** THE NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE (ISIS SLAVE RAPE) IS A TRUE NEW STAGE FOR US ****

      That ultra-left privilege guilt newspaper is FINALLY ADMITTING REALITY !

      Take some time this weekend to send a reality-check to U.S. “Islamophobia” liars + admirers of pedophile Muhammad . . .

      Nihad Awad, Ibrahim Hooper, John Esposito, CAIR, Keith Ellison, Andre Carson, Reza Aslan, Nathan Lean, Juan Cole, Linda Sarsour.
      .
      And remember that with G-Mail, you can create an email address WHICH IS ONLY FOR COUNTER JIHAD PURPOSES.

      • PRCS says

        Aug 14, 2015 at 9:25 pm

        I saw this addressed on a Fox News program this morning and by Carly Fiorina later.

        The Fox crew cited the NYT article but focused on the “institutional nature” of this sex slavery, but none of them (not even Andrea Tantaros–who claims to have read Qur’an) pointed out the “divine” authority to do so–that I recall.

        Fiorina similarly noted the barbarity, but not the reason (although I didn’t catch her whole answer).

        They’re morally outraged at the barbarity but are either ignorant of the ideology driving it or are prevented–by and for whatever reason–to just blurt out the truth.

        • Lynn says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 7:47 am

          I think people are still being PC about the islamicbuIIshit. There is pressure to protect people for some reason. Money? Life? But unless people take a grasp of the evil of islam;we are screwed. Do people not understand the genocide of populations thru rape or death of non muslim women? And groups like Code Pink. What the HeII is their problem. They would be first up for rapping and being throwing from a building. Haw can they be willingly ignorant is beyond me…The entire islamic culture is pedophile oriented. Men use young boys for sexual pleasure and find women unattractive objects only necessary for services and continuing the cult of islam. It’s a sick culture bent on overtaking ours…

          “The nature of islam is to dominate not to be dominated; top impose it’s law upon all nations and to extend it’s power to the entire planet.” Hasan Al-Banna founder of the muslim brotherhood.
          What’s not to understand in his statement?

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Aug 16, 2015 at 9:21 am

        Yes.

        Reality is breaking in.

        They printed the story. They didn’t edit out what the Yazidi girl survivors said.

        And it’s shocking. It will shock people.

        *Some* of those who read it, will go a-googling, perhaps for the first time. Many will find themselves here, or at Raymond Ibrahim’s site, or Mark Durie’s site, or a number of others – they may well stumble across a slew of sources, including all the discussions of the Muslim rape gangs that have preyed upon thousands of underaged British non-Muslim girls – and they will find themselves faced with a mountain of texts out of canonical Islamic sources and authoritative Islamic readings of those sources, that make it pretty damn plain that Islam, Islam, Islam as such – not some weird fringe thing, not something long ago and far away and covered in dust, but ISlam here and now – teaches that enslaving and raping non-Muslim women and girls is…GOOD, that it’s something Muslim males can do and *ought* to do if they can. They will get their noses rubbed in the sheer hideousness of Islam.

        And the Resistance – the Order of the Phoenix – will get a whole lot of new recruits.

        This is, of course, a ‘teaching moment’. Make sure you know the relevant facts about Mohammed the slave-trader, Mohammed the slave-owner, Mohammed the rapist, and his status as ‘the perfect man’, the “excellent example of conduct’. Make sure you can explain that for Muslims, Mohammed isn’t judged by any external standard of conduct but, rather , *is* the standard of conduct. And be prepared to supply this information if the subject of Islamic State jihadis’ rape-as-worship-of-allah, as described in the NYT article (and probably elsewhere – it’s a horror story that is rapidly spreading around the internet) comes up in conversation with people you know.

        Perhaps, thanks to the testimony of this Yazidi survivor, and a journalist having enough of a journalist’s sense of The Story to be willing to publish that testimony, combined with the efforts of those already informed who can act to magnify the message, enough people in the West (and elsewhere, like India) will wake up, in time.

  2. Infidel from Down Under says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 7:39 pm

    Yet again more evidence to the case that far from being a ‘Peaceful Religion , Islam is an evil cult

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 9:08 am

      It is a religion, or cult, of rape. Raping infidel women = worshipping and pleasing ‘allah’.

      It is a religion, or cult, of murder – human sacrifice. Murdering Infidels – ritually butchering them = worshipping/ pleasing ‘allah’; it’s the Muslim’s ticket to ‘paradise’.

      It is a religion, or cult, of extortion, theft and robbery.

      It is a religion, or cult, of slavery. Muslims call themselves slaves of allah and feel entitled to enslave non-Muslims (and all Muslim females are, in essence, slaves of the males).

      The only reason this is not seen clearly all of the time by all of its intended victims is because Islam is also par excellence the religion of the Lie. If weak, the local manifestations of the Ummah mask themselves and play nice…until they are strong enough, then the fake smiles and flowery nothings are dispensed with, the mask comes off, and the monster is loosed.

  3. zulu says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 7:40 pm

    Islamic State ruler ‘kept 26-year-old American air worker as his personal sex slave’ before she was killed in February

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3198571/Islamic-State-ruler-kept-26-year-old-American-air-worker-personal-sex-slave-killed-February.html#ixzz3ipsllw5K

    • PRCS says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 8:09 pm

      That seems a more likely scenario than the NBC link listed above.

  4. Angemon says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 7:41 pm

    What kind of moral blindness has overtaken non-Muslim leaders?

    The same kind of moral blindness that has taken over plenty of other people: the need to claim that they’re doing such and such and therefore they’re good people. “Dialoguing” with muslims while ignoring islamic texts and atrocities? Hi-five and pat one another on the back – we’re looking for common ground with someone different, we’re great people. Ignoring what the evidence says, raising a common thug killed by the police to sainthood and portray the police as racist gun nuts with an itchy trigger finger? Hi-fives, pats on the backs – we’re standing up for the little (figuratively, ’cause the thug was built like a linebacker) guy, we’re great people. Forcing a Christian baker to cater to a same-sex marriage, despite the separation between Church and state and the availability of other caterers? Hi-fives, pats on the backs – we’re fighting homophobia, we’re great people. Starting a s***-storm on twitter and getting one obscure joke removed from a video game? Yay, I’m a good person – someone pat me on the back and heck, hi-fives all around!

    https://twitter.com/icequeenerika/status/584095457544163328

  5. Cecilia Ellis says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 11:24 pm

    Breaking News:

    Kayla Mueller, an American humanitarian worker held hostage for two-and-one-half years by ISIS captors, was tortured and raped repeatedly by Islamic State caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who said she was his property and personal sex slave. Read news article at following link:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3198571/Islamic-State-ruler-kept-26-year-old-American-air-worker-personal-sex-slave-killed-February.html

    • Cecilia Ellis says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 11:26 pm

      Sorry, I just saw that Zulu had previously posted this same information. Apologies to all.

      • Westman says

        Aug 15, 2015 at 12:36 am

        No apology needed. It should be on every news source to show the world what a vulgar, vicious animal is Aku Bakr Bagman and his followers. They need to be totally exterminated by the West starting with him and his lieutenants.

        How is it that the West thinks the ME can cooperate sufficiently over their fractionalized beliefs to rid the world of Daesh? Only a secular army is capable to do the job and it must be free to use weapons on the scale of the Tianjin explosion with considerable “collateral damage”. It won’t happen because it would impede the enjoyable ride of the elite and force positions to be taken; supporting the West over Islam, and using methods even more destructive than used by Daesh.

        The only real safety for free people is too stay away from the ME and Islam.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 12:59 am

          Westman, why is it that we did not hear about this from our own government or media? Apparently, John McCain sent a letter to the Attorney General Loretta Lynch demanding to know why Umm Sayaf was not returned to the U.S. for prosecution — since Umm Sayaf knew about and was complicit in the kidnapping of Mueller — but was instead turned over by the Obama administration to the Kurdistan Regional Government. God, I hate this administration!

          Disgusting! This action merits a flood of letters to Congressmen and Senators! And, though I suspected, from the moment it was reported that Mueller was allegedly killed in a rescue attempt by Americans, that Mueller had indeed been killed by ISIS, only now do we find out that the Pentagon knew all along and said nothing!

          There is absolutely nothing redeemable about the Obama administration’s actions! Not that I thought there would be . . .

        • Westman says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 2:40 am

          The US has been on a “guns and butter” trajectory since Pres. Truman fired Gen MacArthur. That was the end of risking the economy for success in war. Vietnam taught the military and administrative elite that spending the lives of typical citizens(the draft) to pursue the expansion of business interests against collectivism(communism) had a backlash. It was thought this could be reduced by changing to a voluntary army. This proved to be inadequate when larger forces were needed; leading to the employment of private contractors, essentially mercenaries.

          The US is sitting on such an economic house of leveraged cards that it is too frightened of the fallout to operate a military operation on the scale of WWII, stop buying oil from Saudi Arabia, stop Iran’s Ayatollah, publicly recognize the supremist intentions of Islam, etc.

          In this environment government can be expected to keep information from the public and be late in responding to assaults on its citizens, if at all, and most of those will be verbal.

          The non-military response to the 1979 Iranian holding of US hostages was the beginning of the retreat in the face of militant Islam and an implied message of weakness.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Aug 15, 2015 at 12:59 pm

          Westman wrote: “The non-military response to the 1979 Iranian holding of US hostages was the beginning of the retreat in the face of militant Islam and an implied message of weakness.”

          Absolutely correct! I remember how enraged we (military) were when there was no response! That lack of response would continue with the Beirut Bombing that killed 243 Americans, the “Black Hawk Down” Mogadishu event, the 1993 WTC bombing, the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, the USS Cole attack, and more.

          To paraphrase Bosch Fawstin, we have taken a stance that enables Muslims to attack us because they can.

  6. Don McKellar says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 11:38 pm

    The New York Times publishing the truth about Islam — FINALLY DOING AN HONEST STORY ON ISLAM — the New York Times? I almost fell off my chair first time I saw this. Obama must be SCREAMING mad right now! His whole world of Islamic deception falling apart, and even the New York Times publishing factual articles on Islam!

    One wonders how many delusional leftist retards will be shocked by this “revelation”? One supposes they’ll be shocked, but then very quickly shuffle it away and make internalized excuses and try and slip back behind the wall of willful ignorance that defines their world view. But it doesn’t change the fact that this is a watershed moment for mainstream media.

    • mortimer says

      Aug 14, 2015 at 11:52 pm

      DK wrote: “The New York Times publishing the truth about Islam — FINALLY DOING AN HONEST STORY ON ISLAM”

      It’s perhaps the beginning of the end of the Leftist LOVE OF ISLAM. The Leftarded cultural Marxists have final blinked! They no longer believe in Islamic good will.

      Their trust in Islam is visibly SHAKEN…and won’t ever be restored…I predict.

      No longer the ‘religion of peace’ (TM)…Islam is now the ‘RELIGION OF RAPE’.

    • Sam Hawkins says

      Aug 15, 2015 at 12:02 am

      Somebody at the NY Times for sure will get fired over this. I can see them gnashing their teeth in the boardroom: “How did this get through?” — “We can kiss that ad money from Arab Gulf companies goodbye now!” — “We were shorthanded, too many people on vacation.” — “Heads must roll. Literally!” — “Uh, do you want me to bring in an executioner?” — “Fool! Of course when I say Literally I don’t mean it literally!” — “Okay, boss.”

    • dsinc says

      Aug 15, 2015 at 1:44 am

      Washington Post has it also.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/leader-of-islamic-state-raped-american-hostage/2015/08/14/266b6bf4-42c1-11e5-846d-02792f854297_story.html

      Leader of Islamic State used American hostage as sexual slave

  7. mortimer says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 11:44 pm

    And FEMINISTS world-wide are SILENT about the SEX SLAVES!

    Silence means approval.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 12:25 am

      Meanwhile NPR is still going non-stop get out the handkerchiefs for the flood of poor helpless illegal Muzzies being smuggled into the EU by a well entrenched network of Muslim conmen..

  8. Wellington says

    Aug 14, 2015 at 11:53 pm

    Islam is for sickos, the confused and the ignorant. After all, the Profiteer Mohammed was all three of these.

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 12:21 am

      absolutely

  9. rightrightright says

    Aug 15, 2015 at 1:02 am

    The Anglican marriage service contains the vow “with my body I thee worship” which expresses love and reverence towards the wife.

    According to Moslems, there is no love and reverence. The woman’s body is merely an interchangeable catalyst which permits a Moslem to show his ‘worship’ of Allah. All hypocrisy and a nonsense of course. Islam is an ideology of loot (these wretched girls are loot) and sex. Why else do the prettiest and youngest slaves pull the highest prices when any female would do to demonstrate the rapist’s ‘worship’?

    The only item being ‘worshipped’ here is a certain organ of the male body which Moslems must, must be able to gratify.

    • Linde Barrera says

      Aug 15, 2015 at 2:32 am

      To rightrightright- I am responding to your 1:02 am Aug 15, 2015 post. First, my deepest heartfelt sympathies go out to the family of Kayla Mueller. What a terrific, humanitarian she was. I pray she is in Heaven enjoying Jesus’ company. Second, that sexual activity performed in the context of religious worship (including sacred or temple prostitution) is bring done as “worship of Allah” by raping non-Muslim women does not surprise me at all, disgusting and barbaric as it is. In many ancient civilizations (Phoenicia–Lebanon; Babylon–Iraq; Cyprus, Greece, Persia–Iran; and much of the Middle East), this “sexual activity as religious worship” was performed. The only difference is that ISIS uses rape of non-Muslim women as a justification to worship their moon god, Allah. As I stated, all of it, especially what ISIS is doing when they forcibly rape minor girls or women of “legal” age, is totally barbaric, disgusting and savage. And why western leaders don’t persue discussion about this with Islamic leaders is total cowardice on their part.

  10. duh_swami says

    Aug 15, 2015 at 8:34 am

    The psychopath feels no remorse. Allah is a psychopath. It’s creator Mahound was a psychopath…
    As a book written for psychopaths by psychopaths, the Quran is a study of psychopathology.
    ‘I’m doing this in gods name’, is not new, but it is always a self serving lie. The Islamic psychopath serves himself in Allah’s name…If rape is not for the selfish, who is it for? If you rape and don’t shout Allahu Akbar, it is a crime, but if the Islamo-psychopath does shout it, and prays over it, it is not a crime but a holy act…
    Only a self serving psychopath twists reality like that…but don’t worry, this has nothing to do with Islam..
    Or so our leaders and the enlightened media tell us….

  11. epistemology says

    Aug 15, 2015 at 1:40 pm

    When Boko Haram kidnapped the girls in Nigeria I had a Nigerian friend watching CNN with me. He couldn’t fathom why the Nigerian president (Goodluck Jonathan at that time) didn’t do anything about it. But I agree with Robert Western politicians aren’t any better. They should study the Koran and the hadiths and see for themselves that Islam is the religion of barbarism. IS and Boko Haram practice true Islam and we’ve got to protect all those who are deemed infidel and not the muzzies.

  12. Linda Rivera says

    Aug 15, 2015 at 7:39 pm

    Seizing millions of non-Muslim females for sex slaves is the biggest teaching of Islam. Our leaders are GUILTY of CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY for massively importing Muslims into our nations.

    “Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad
    will remain as long there is Islam.” – Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan, a leading authority on Islam in Saudi Arabia.

    http://libertygb.org.uk Freedom and the West ’In 2011 Sheik Abu Ishak Al Huweini at Al-Azhar University in Cairo (the most respected university in the entire Muslim world) proudly told his brother Muslims that it was their duty to engage in violent jihad and that one day each Muslim would have 3 or 4 white Western slaves.’
    http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6213-freedom-and-the-west

    Patriotic, political Liberty GB leader, Paul Weston:

    Where are the Politicians on Rotherham’s 1400 Child Rape Victims?

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 12:15 am

      MO and his piggy buddies did not practice self restraint either around captured kindergarten age children.

  13. hammad says

    Aug 15, 2015 at 8:01 pm

    Ignorants…no one here know what’s the meaning of right hand possessed !!!
    It doesn’t mean slaves or sex slave ..otherwise it would be slave in Quran.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 15, 2015 at 11:55 pm

      Ham-fisted Taqiyya artist hammad wrote:

      Ignorants…no one here know what’s the meaning of right hand possessed !!!
      It doesn’t mean slaves or sex slave ..otherwise it would be slave in Quran.
      ……………………………

      Notice hammad doesn’t say what “possession of the right hand” (supposedly) actually means.

      And how could he? It is quite clear that this phrase refers to enslaved Infidels.

      Qur’an 4:24:

      “Also prohibited are women already married, except those whom your right hands possess…

      Qur’an 33:50:

      O Prophet! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war

      Qur’an 23: 1-6:

      The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or those whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.

      Qur’an 4:3:

      If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with them, then only one, or a captive that your right hands possess.

      Qur’an 70:22-30:

      Not so those devoted to Prayer—those who remain steadfast to their prayer; and those in whose wealth is a recognized right for the (needy) who asks and him who is prevented (for some reason from asking); and those who hold to the truth of the Day of Judgement; and those who fear the displeasure of their Lord—for their Lord’s displeasure is the opposite of Peace and Tranquility—and those who guard their chastity, except with their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess—for then they are not to be blamed.

      And it’s not just the Qur’an. Here is more of the same from the Hadith:

      Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”
      Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

      Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger (may peace te upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:” And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)” (i. e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end).
      Sahih Muslim 8:3432

      There is much more of the same. How can hammad claim with a straight face that none of this referes to the lawful rape of sex slaves under Islam?

    • Jay Boo says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 12:12 am

      Muhammad’s EXCUSE
      Islam is a parasite.
      It may at times be dormant.
      Most Muslims may possibly not even be living the full pig bath lifestyle in spite of Islam’s vile teachings because (the opportunity) may not be at the moment feasible.

      But make no mistake, and assume that is because Islam is above such things.
      The inherent filth of Islam permeates every Muslim’s tainted thoughts waiting for the moment to reveal what Islam truly is that is (an Excuse).

    • Jack Diamond says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 12:54 am

      Let’s make it clear as a church bell for hammad.
      from the mullahs at Islam Q&A, (are they “ignorants”?): “Right hand possessions (Malak-ul-Yameen) means slaves and maids, those came in possession of Muslims through war or purchase. After having the possession of slave maid it is lawful and correct to have sexual relation with them. Even today if Muslims get possession over infidel country, this condition is possible, lawful and correct.’ ”
      —Get that? It means slaves through war or purchase that you can have sexual relations with.

      The Encyclopedia of Islam, Published by E.J. Brill, Vol. 1, page 24 under the word ‘abd’, it says:
      “Abd is the ordinary word for ‘slave’ in Arabic of all periods, more particularly for “male slave”, “female slave” being ama. On the other hand, the Quran frequently uses the term “rakaba”, literally “neck, nape of the neck”, and still more frequently, the periphrasis “ma malakat aymanukum – “that which your (their) right hand possesses”. The Quran uses “that which your right hand possesses” as a term for slave.

      Hughes Dictionary of Islam, page 596 on slavery, says: “The term generally used in the Quran for slaves is “ma malakat aimanukum”, – “that which your right hand possesses.” –get it? slave=rt hand possess

      Is Ibn Kathir an “ignorant”? From his tafsir on Qur’an 4:24 “(except those whom your right hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, “We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed. (Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess). Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women.”

      Captured women=slaves=right hand possessions to have SEXUAL RELATIONS with. In front of their husbands.

      Now read graven’s samples from the Qur’an and hadith again and go away and hide.

    • Angemon says

      Aug 16, 2015 at 6:55 am

      hammad posted:

      Ignorants…no one here know what’s the meaning of right hand possessed !!!
      It doesn’t mean slaves or sex slave ..otherwise it would be slave in Quran.

      And the blatant contradiction isn’t apparent to you – no one knows what it means but it doesn’t mean slave, because no one know what it means, just what it doesn’t mean, even though no one knows what it means and therefore they can’t rule anything out.

      Let’s take that “logic” further, okay? Whenever the quran says “the messenger of allah” or “the apostle of allah” we don’t know who it is referring to, but it’s not muhammad, otherwise it would say muhammad in the quran. So who is this apostle of allah fellow the quran mentions, hammad?

      The truth is, we KNOW what “those who your right hand possess” means. We know it because we have the sirah and ahadith explaining how and why those verses were “revealed”. We know it because many commentators have explained it out through the centuries – in short, we know what it means because muslims told us what it means. And it means slave.

  14. Jay Boo says

    Aug 16, 2015 at 12:20 am

    Who would have thought that the god of the universe would be so carnal in disposition.

    MO wanted sex slaves
    Allah condoned it.
    What a surprising coincidence.

  15. chanah says

    Aug 19, 2015 at 8:38 am

    “no one here know what’s the meaning of right hand possessed !!!
    It doesn’t mean slaves or sex slave ..otherwise it would be slave in Quran” .
    does this incl you and your imam? if so why don’t you ask your god the meaning of the verses, after all he wrote the quran and have a prefect copy in heaven, all he have to do is look it up, and tell you ppl the meaning of the verse, providing ofcourse that he knows how to read, which I doubt, we all know he is mute deaf and dumb

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.