This plot shows once again that appeasement doesn’t work. The British government has done all it could do to placate Islamic jihadists and supremacists. It has allowed them to preach freely all over the land, while hounding and jailing counter-jihadists on the flimsiest of pretexts, and banning foreign ones from entering the country. It has stigmatized and demonized resistance to jihad terror as “racism” and “bigotry.” It has allowed Muslim rape gangs to victimize thousands of British girls with absolute impunity, allowing those girls no justice or redress. And what does it get for all this? A jihad plot against the Queen. Was it expecting gratitude?
“Isis: Fears of British jihadi VJ Day plot to assassinate the Queen,” by Priya Joshi, International Business Times, August 8, 2015:
British jihadis are reportedly plotting to assassinate the Queen at an event to mark the 70th anniversary of VJ Day – Victory in Japan and the end of the Second World War.
According to The Mail on Sunday, police and MI5 have received intelligence suggesting the assassination plot is being orchestrated from Syria by Islamic State commanders.
The extremist plot is believed to involve explosions using deadly pressure cooker bombs with the intention of causing a high numbers of casualties, as thousands of members of the public are expected to line the streets around Whitehall and Westminster Abbey.
The Mail Online reports that sources have told the publication that a “specific threat was made against the Queen”, prompting an urgent review of security arrangements by Scotland Yard.
Senior members of Scotland Yard’s Royal Protection branch, SO14, have been informed of the threat, along with SO1 Specialist Protection, the unit responsible for the security of the Prime Minister and any dignitaries considered to be ‘under threat from terrorist attack’. The Home Office has also been made aware of the terror plot.
Prince Charles, who is expected to attend the weekend celebrations, is also identified in intelligence reports as another possible target….
JawsV says
Never seen a sorrier sight than Western European nations in the 21st century permitting Muslims to bully, intimidate and murder their citizens.
Shane says
You forgot rape; there is a rape jihad in many European cities and the police are doing very little to fight it.
Muslims committing 95% of rapes against Norwegian women:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCdc8vQTQVw
Welcome to Sweden of Today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlG75wb7lLw Sweden Is Gone, Sweden Is Finished: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhstVDWsetM
‘Multiculturalism failing’: Violent riots engulf Stockholm suburbs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipGpAUKJtzI
Muslim Rape Jihad in the U.K. Part 1:
Aton says
And you are still not allowed to speak out against Islam.
Northern Ireland priest in court, for saying that Islam is a child of the devil….
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/pastor-james-mcconnell-solicitor-argues-preacher-did-not-incite-hatred-or-encourage-violence-against-muslims-31431784.html
descendantofacrusader says
How very sad that high civilization can be brought so low by the barbarity of a primitive and backward society, which wantonly supplicates itself to a demon god that mirrors its own hatred, that despises anyone who has risen above the barbaric hovel of its own existence.
Jaladhi says
No, I think the Western civilization is being brought down by the traitors of the West – their leaders, media and academia. It is as if all of these have already converted to Islam and working in cahoots with Muslims. If the situation doesn’t change, the downward spiral of the West will continue until it disappears in the blackhole of Islam!!
Beagle says
Islam somehow enrolls people as propagandists and recruiters long before those people convert to Islam, if they ever do. Nearly all the politicians in the West recruit for Islam and lie for it.
Alissa says
yes I so agree but I also agree that the masses of low information or no information westerners drugged by idiotic tv… who sit in their arm chairs every night watching America’s Got Talent or So You Think You Can Dance, do contribute to our downfall by default. They don’t know what’s going on and they don’t want to know because then they might have to do something.
Karen says
Both groups work together for the destruction of the West. The irreligious Left always has a point to prove, and they will not stop until their own culture is penniless, smashed, and powerless. They will not stop until a generation is born that doesn’t remember how things used to be. Weirdly self-destructive, this is how they create self-esteem.
Huck Folder says
Combine SINIster left with iSLAM and you get SINISLAM,
a ‘marriage’ made in hell.
abad says
All in the name of “equality” no less. But will the UK learn that not all “cultures” – nor religions – are created equal?
Huck Folder says
Alternatively: “If it ain’t broke, don’t ‘fix’ it!”
What was wrong/deficient/lacking in all those previously CIVILIZED countries, that they had to import MILLIONS of ALIENS*. Did they say multyculty will make us better/stronger.
Did ANYONE look at the ‘religion’ of those ALIENS*, their BoH™, their customs, when they had at least 50 examples to look at?
Did they not read history books about arab COLONIALISM?
Were there NO dissenting voices in the leftard echo-chambers?
Can this be tracked back to any one individual or group?
Huck Folder says
* ALIENS as insidious as Ripley’s (believe it or not).
Take over the minds, souls, bodies and countries of the infected,
then use them to spread the infection further.
WORSE than Ebola, because that kills off its victims.
Whereas islam creates self-propagating zombies.
And ALL from ONE narcissistic psychopath!
ECAW says
Soldiers, grannies, package holiday tourists…who cares? The establishment isn’t going to take global jihad seriously until some of their own start to take the hit. But I can think of many who are more responsible for the appalling situation we find ourselves in than the queen who has always done her best for the country.
Baucent says
I’m not sure that a high profile assassination (curious the word Assassin refers to an islamic group) will even wake up the politicians.
cs says
You right, after 9/11 people still cowing to them, so in fact there is no reason people will stop to cow in response to their bully behavior.
John Alexander says
Killing the Queen would be terrible but much more terrible is the descent into a soft liberal totalitarianism. There is no better illustration of that than the arrest of a man in Scotland for merely suggesting the burning of an ISIS flag outside a mosque. How could anybody even Muslims object to the burning of the flag of depraved monsters? Why aren’t Muslims burning ISIS flags outside their mosques?
This from a post about it:
“This is the reality of today’s Britain. Because of mass Muslim immigration we cannot even be united in opposition to the clearest example of evil that the world has ever known.
That such an unambiguously right thing as the burning of the flag of evil is against the law indicates just how low we are. Just how close we now are to that final drop.”
It’s at: http://john-moloney.blogspot.com/2015/08/funnel-coin-britain.html
The Doctor says
The reason Muslims would object to the burning of the ISIS flag is because the ISIS flag contains the text of the shahadda, which is the Islamic statement of faith something along the lines of “There is no god but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger.” Burning that would be desecration, so naturally they are opposed to doing it.
Jaladhi says
>”In India whenever dogs show their mischief by killing Hindus and Christians , public men of Hindus will do a mass massacre of Muslims and families.
If a Muslim inside India helps any terrorist then every muslim in that district who is working will loose job , loose business , loose the rented house etc and public men will kill some Muslims.”<
Not really true!! It is only when Hindus are pushed to the extreme they retaliate. Muslims know it very well and they will terrorize to the point just below the critical point as it happens from time to time. If what you say about Hindu retaliation was true, all Muslims would have left India long ago. It is the docile nature and inclusiveness of Hindus that keeps Muslims and Islam in India.
Jaladhi says
This is in reply to Winnind’s comments above above.
Don McKellar says
So let’s say the kill Prince Charles as a “target of opportunity” instead of the Queen? What will be the reaction?
ECAW says
You mean the Prince Charles who has the same level of respect for the religion whose god intends to fry him for eternity as the wettest of wet clergymen, and who some people believe has actually converted?
Think I’ll pass on that one.
umbra says
Prince William will be next in line. The popularity of the royal family will likely shoot up with a King William. The present monarch may be tempted to step down as a result. During all this, MI5, MI6 along with the military will work covertly around the clock to liquidate all perpetrators and associated terror networks (both foreign and domestic) connected to the plot.
Georg says
What a situation we’re in where the will of the people is treated with disdain and democratic avenues all but closed.
Jay Boo says
Truth Detector in a single finger
Discuss ISIS and its role to Islam with so-called ‘moderate’ Muslims in a non-confrontational manner and then show them the Islamic finger of “superiority” as if merely making a point but, hold it up long enough for them to notice and see how they react.
William says
Let’s imagine, though I wish it would never occur, that during a public ceremony like the one coming up, a Mohammedan, a white convert of native Briton stock, successfully infiltrates the security zone of protection around the Queen and fatally injures her alone, and that the assassin is killed in the act. What would you expect the consequences to be? There would be shock experienced by the British and also by the rest of the world. People would say that it is unprecedented. Some would recall the similarity to the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand and the nightmare that followed and warnings not to do a replication. Then there would be confusion about the motive for the murder. The authorities would determine the perp to have acted alone, with no evidence of a conspiracy. With the obvious religious background of the murderer, the government would not be able to disregard the connection. At the same time, the Mohammedan inhabitants of the island nation and the Islamic apologists in the government, namely Cameron et al, would be in full defensive mode concerning backlash against people of the Muslim faith, and that a community should not be punished for the action of one deranged member, for we all know that Islam is a religion of peace, and what the murderer did has nothing whatsoever to do with the great, noble, and peaceful religion of Islam. A week or so later there would be an outpouring of grief all over as we all watch the funeral procession bearing the body of the former Queen of England to its final resting place. The Royal Family would henceforth be forbidden from taking part in person in future public ceremonies like the deadly last one. There would be outpouring of support for the family and expressions of solidarity, with many ethnic group representatives locked arm in arm, pledging that this act would not deter the move to a tolerant multicultural Britain. Other than that, life would continue. Drones would continue to fly over ISIS in Syria with claims that the terrorist state is on the verge of collapse. Meanwhile the British people would come under even greater surveillance and restrictions by the state. Mohammedans would continue to enter the country and continue to infiltrate and subvert what remains of a once functioning European civilization.
Joe says
Well said. That is clearly the way things have been going. But if you are right, then the enemy has succeeded in instilling fear in the people. You said, “The Royal Family would henceforth be forbidden from taking part in person in future public ceremonies like the deadly last one.” The enemy is succeeding in silencing the people from speaking out against them and their ties to the Islamic faith. If the enemy continues to stop the people from public speech, memorials, and the such, the enemy will succeed in condemning the world to silence and fear. That is the goal, submit to Islam or die in fear if you don’t. After the attack on the twin towers, American leadership told the people to continue to live your lives as before. They tried to tell the enemy they would not get us to live in fear. But the American leadership has instead tried to hug the enemy and win them over to the American way of life. The problem is, the enemy is taking advantage of all the good will shown by the American leadership and they are working hard at getting into every branch of government. The enemy has not intentions of embracing the American way of life, they are just putting up with it as best they can until they are powerful enough and have enough support in government to do away with the American way of life and replace it with the Islamic way of life. Until the people of the world unite and demand a reversal. The people must stand up and say that they will not tolerate the world dominating ideology of fear and suppression to be taught in public or private schools including all Mosques and houses of religion in the free world. If this is not done soon, the enemy will continue to gain power and there will not be a free world anymore. The enemy is bent on destroying the free world and establishing Islamic rule of law, just as all Muslims everywhere have been taught for the last 14 centuries. Am I right or wrong? If you think I am wrong, then tell me a better way to preserve our way of life?
Angemon says
Britons try to please muslims, they get slammed for it. Britons try to combat islamic terrorism, they get slammed for it. I think the general population is starting to realize that the only acceptable condition for muslims in Britain is for Britons to convert to islam, all along while the government sits idly by, whistling away at news of rape gangs and no-go zones, slandering and imprisoning those who call attention to it.
At this rate, England (if not Europe, since the islamic MO is the same all around) will have a fully fledged 21st century Revolt of the Brotherhoods* in their hands
*an anti-islamic, anti-corrupt government rebellion in early 16th century Spain.
Jaladhi says
I am not able to see all comments. whats going on. I hahd posted several comments on this thread this morning and now none are there? In the article it shows 50 comments but it is showing only 16. Is the site under cyber attack?
Jaladhi says
Suddenly, everything is ok now, comments and all visible??
ecosse1314 says
What would happen if the queen was assassinated????. Probably not a lot. Maybe lots and lots of warnings about not attacking mosques or moslems….lots and lots about religion of peace…..lots and lots of radicalised on the internet….lots and lots of stories about lone wolfs.
Just like after 9/11 the muslims will come out of it as victims.
Jaladhi says
Absolutely, that is how Muslims work – always play the victim even when they commit genocide of the world. They used this technique right from Mo’s time – calling the Meccans as oppressors of Muslims. Years later they killed or converted the poor Meccans. Here in the West the traitor lefties do the job for Muslims!! And once the Muslims take over the lefties will first in line of beheadings!!
Peggy says
They’ve already shown their true face and life is become uncomfortable for us, not them.
abad says
Has the UK ever really evaluated WHY they allowed so many Muslims into their borders?
And let us set aside the liberal:
Tolerance
Multiculturalism
Equality
and other assorted liberal BS that makes no sense whatsoever.
TIA
Aton says
>>Has the UK ever really evaluated WHY they allowed
>>so many Muslims into their borders?
The great goal of the liberal elite was to prevent another WWII, by diluting the populations and destroying the nations of Europe. No nations – no wars. Just a One World Society – and everyone all equal and the same. A laudable dream.
.
However ….. this plan could only ever succeed in liberal a fantasy.
.
in reality, the stupidity and in their lack of historical knowledge of the liberal elite has unleashed all the horrors of Pandora’s Box. Their crazy policy will either:
a. Create a civil war in Europe so horrendous, it will eclipse the Wars of Religion of the 17th century.
b. Drive all Europeans out of Europe and into Greenland.
c. Achieve their goal of a One World Government, and then find that its leader is Osama bin Laden….
Liberal thinking always has been, and always will be, short-sighted and infantile. I predicted all of this 20 years ago, and everything I have predicted has come to pass. Yet the liberals still think this is all a great idea.
Aton
Peggy says
I can even graps the concept of diluting the population but what European leaders did was not dilute but poison the population.
They could’ve imported migrants from anywhere and the population would have been diluted enough but they deliberately chose Muslims.
You can introduce many flowers into a garden and the garden can look beautiful but the moment you introduce a weed your garden is doomed.
This was a deliberate attempt not to dilute but to poison.
jewdog says
Britain may be acquiescent from a counter-jihadist’s point of view, but it still supports operations against ISIS, thereby earning itself a collective death sentence from the ISIS version of Judge Bean.
voegelinian says
“The extremist plot is believed to involve explosions using deadly pressure cooker bombs with the intention of causing a high numbers of casualtie…”
As opposed to a moderate plot that would involve a gallery of suspects Hercule Poirot would interrogate in the drawing room, one of whom had managed to slip gardenia poisoning into the Queen’s High Tea.
voegelinian says
Speaking of galleries, the comments section above provides a fascinating, if irksome, glimpse into the State of the Union of the Counter-Jihad, vis-à-vis the Problem of the Problem (where the primary problem is (or should be considered to be) Islam, while the secondary problem is the mainstream myopia throughout the West to the primary problem). I.e., there crops up a tertiary problem — the Problem of the Problem of the Problem — insofar as the idea-culture of the Counter-Jihad continues to be an incoherent force field of irrational reflexes, instincts, tendencies, and speculations; vis-à-vis the secondary problem.
Jay Boo says
irksome???
That is a very good word voeg. — (Some might say …Well, you know)
But, it is good to see you have a sense of humor.
Yes “… the primary problem is (or should be considered to be) Islam…”
That is good advice.
Hmmmm
All this pedantic panic posing as constructive criticism of counter jihad.
Oy veh.
voegelinian says
The tertiary problem includes the tendency to think the “real problem” is something along the lines of a Dastardly Cabal of Dastardly Leftist Elites. There is a small pool out there of hardcore conspiracy theorists — on the extreme Left and extreme Right — who foment this notion with intense detail; then outside that pool but contiguous with its waters there seem to be a multitude of lakes (more than Minnesota has, it seems) of various people, including many in the Counter-Jihad (whom I have termed the “Real-Problemers”), who indulge rhetoric that “goes there”, whether they intend to do so, or (irresponsibly) not.
The “Real Problemers”
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-real-problemers.html
Aton says
But you are still not allowed to speak out against Islam.
Northern Ireland priest in court, for saying that Islam is a child of the devil….
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/pastor-james-mcconnell-solicitor-argues-preacher-did-not-incite-hatred-or-encourage-violence-against-muslims-31431784.html
JIMJFOX says
“Queen, DoE and Charles assassinated…
thousands killed and injured.”
Cameron says “Nothing to do with Islam”,
“I feel for their family”
Council of British Muslims- “Islamophobia”
Guardian & BBC- “release Choudary NOW”
Archbishop of Canterbury- “we must reach out…”
EDL membership surges to millions.
UKIP tipped to get 20 million votes.
Tommy Robinson locked up again.
MI5/MI6 “baffled as to motive”
William says
Meanwhile, a large number of refugees are at the French end of the Chunnel desiring to enter Britain via that route. They are demanding they have the right to enter Britain. The French would love the British to let them enter, but it looks like the other end, on the English side is not cooperating. The EU and the UN want the problem solved, that is, the refugees allowed entry.
JawsV says
They’re not “refugees” they’re INVADERS.
JIMJFOX says
They are commonly described as “Immigrants”. Strangely, when I applied to emigrate I had to satisfy many requirements such as no criminal record, good job prospects or a pre-arranged job, adequate finances and more.
So this is an offensive term applied to these invaders. And I see some bleeding heart liberal tosser recently saying use of the term “Illegal Immigrants” contravenes their human rights.
Hmmmmm….
Peggy says
By not calling them refugees any longer they are admitting that they are not refugees.
So then why is the UN telling us that we must accept them?
If they are migrants then they must have a visa so there is no need to sneak in or force their way in.
They are neither refugees nor migrants. They are as someone before me said INVADERS and if a country is being invaded then they have to fight back.
vlparker says
ISIS is not very bright. Prince Charles and the Queen are two of islam’s best friends in Britain.
dumbledoresarmy says
Prince Charles, perhaps. The Queen? – I don’t think so.
And Harry and William not at all, methinks.
Peggy says
Harry and William’s stepfather would’ve been Muslim if that accident didn’t happen.
Diana has so much love for these creatures. First it was a Muslim heart surgen and then Dodi.
Bad choices on her part. Imagine if the future kind of England’s stepfather was a Muslim.
Peggy says
Diana HADA not has so much love for these creatures.
JawsV says
What accident? There was no accident. And the “stepfather” as a Muslim had everything to do with it. Diana would still be alive today if she hadn’t “gone Muslim.”
mortimer says
The greatest weapon against jihad is a THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE JIHAD DOCTRINE.
UK needs TRAINERS like Geller and Spencer to TRAIN THE British people to RECOGNIZE AND REPORT JIHADISTS to the authorities. KNOWLEDGE OF THE JIHAD DOCTRINE will DEFEAT jihad.
Raja says
Moritimer,
This is one of the best comments of the day…
duh_swami says
Killing the Queen Mum…Not a good idea but consistent with the rest of Islam’s bad ideas…
mortimer says
Look up the meaning of ‘Queen Mum’ (Queen Mother).
dumbledoresarmy says
I would urge commenters to try not to give in to despair and defeatism.
You want to *galvanise* English and other British persons who may lob in here, not *paralyse* them.
You want to inform and encourage them, not beat them down and make them think that the case is hopeless so why bother?
Many in the UK *are* wide awake; they are slowly organising, behind people like Paul Weston (Liberty GB) and Gavin Boby (Law and Freedom Foundation). Bodies such as the venerable old Royal Society of Saint George could be used, by the Islamoaware, to help mount a resistance at cultural / social level. The British Pakistani Christian Foundation are working hard, lobbying and trying to build awareness among church people. Barnabas Fund has their “Operation Nehemiah”. And I’d encourage any British poster reading this, who is aged between 18 and 35, and happens to be Islamoaware and alarmed, to **join the Territorial Army** (that is, what we Aussies call “the Army Reserves”) and get some training…and do some networking, on the Q.T. There’s lots that can be done.
Malcolm Lord Pearson, Earl of Rannoch, in the House of Lords, is awake. He and Baroness Caroline Cox are the people who invited Geert Wilders to the UK some years ago (and he *did* get in, eventually, despite being initially prevented).
Here’s what Malcolm Pearson has been up to, recently.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/08/03/ukip-peer-islam-is-not-a-peaceful-religion/
Now, many here might say, “what took him so long?”, but what matters is this: that he is *doing* it (I’d hazard the guess that the four “Koranic scholars” who are helping him, would be Islamosavvy folks who have studied the Koran; I’d be very surprised if it were Muslims!) and it is going to be publicised. All Islamosavvy Britons must now get behind him, and PUSH. And…write to him and ask him if he’s read Rev Dr Mark Durie’s books on Islam, or whether he’s aware of the scholarly work of Tina Magaard.
And here’s a really interesting piece by a British writer, that appeared recently at Ali Sina’s Faithfreedom website. It applies to *many* other countries besides Britain; and it applies not only to “the West”, I think, but elsewhere.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/how-islam-fascinates-the-west/
Here’s an excerpt, from the beginning of the article. Note: it’s not perfect; I would mentally substitute ‘Islam’ or ‘Muslims’ wherever the author writes “Islamism’ and “Islamists”.
“….To allow one group of people to create conditions whereby the rest of a population are made nervous, and then to allow them with impunity to accuse that remainder of paranoia, is a denial of reality.
“People who are forced to live under this double bind — that they will be damned if they speak out against this erosion of culture and free speech and damned again if they do not — have a third oppression added to their existence — they are forced to live with the consequences of not speaking out.
“I believe that the UK will have to live with those consequences unless its government shakes itself free of its fascination by Islamism.”
It is in many ways a good and useful article, and bears reading. Her discussion of the techniques of Muslim deception and how it affects western hearers, is excellent.
For example, she says this:
“Most ordinary people in western cultures hold truth-telling to be sacrosanct and, because it is natural to assume that the other person is also telling the truth, we are all too easily fooled by those who, for example, avow the peaceable nature of Islam even shortly after innocents have been killed in its name.”
And that is one of the key things, I think; and I think it applies even to our supposedly cynical politicians, and religious leaders and diplomats and businesspeople. For *all* of them have been raised within, steeped in, western civilisation’s basic paradigm – guilt/ innocence truth/ falsehood. “Most ordinary people in western cultures hold truth-telling to be sacrosanct.” And so they are deceived, when they encounter Muslims who grow up soaked from birth in a culture that is based on what an astute author called Harry G Frankfurt called, succinctly, BULLSH”T, first in an essay, and then in a book called “On Bullshit” (2006).
From the wiki entry on that book:
“On Bullshit (2005), by Harry G. Frankfurt, is a philosophical essay that presents a theory of bullshit that defines the concept and analyses the applications of bullshit in the contexts of communication.
“As such, bullshit can be neither true nor false; hence, the bullshitter is someone whose principal aim — when uttering or publishing bullshit — is to impress the listener and the reader with words that communicate an impression that something is being or has been done, words that are neither true nor false, and so obscure the facts of the matter being discussed.
“In contrast, the liar must know the truth of the matter under discussion, in order to better conceal it from the listener or the reader being deceived with a lie; while the bullshitter’s sole concern is personal advancement and advantage to their own agenda.”
Yes, Islam and Muslims do use ‘lies’ in the simple sense described there; but an awful lot of what is done and said among Muslims, starting with the Islamic texts themselves! – seems to me to fit the bill of what Frankfurt calls “bull-sh*t”.
Muslims are both ‘liars’ in that simple sense – par excellence – and *also*, I think to a far greater degree, bull-sh*t artists. They will say *anything*, at any time, if they think that at that moment, to *those* hearers, what they are saying will advance the cause of Islam/ polish the image of Islam/ protect Islam/ the Ummah/ their precious muslim selves. Whether they’re flattering and pouring out a cloud of flowery nothings, or boasting, or uttering bloodcurdling threats or the grossest of obscenities, is all a matter of what they think will work to persuade – whether by seduction/ bamboozling, or by outright shock and terror – the person or persons they are addressing. Martha Gellhorn saw it among the “Palestinian” Arabs whom she interviewed in 1960, she grew so weary of the vast gulf between checkable/ observable facts and whatever it was that these people were telling her, that she invented the word “madhattery” to describe it.
And they rot their *own* brains, eventually; Oriana Fallaci found that to be the case with Yasser Arafat, she interviewed him and her description of him is a description of a decaying or chaotic soul, so absolutely unmoored from or disregarding of the Good, or even just That Which Is, as to be, from a Dantean point of view, already in Hell.
But the thing is – ordinary people in the Western world, and our common or garden politicians *as well*, despite their own tendency toward a bit of BS on their own account – just *are not* experienced in recognising, detecting or dealing with this level and intensity of BS and lies. We have our sociopaths, our psychopaths, our “Slick Willies”, but they are just not in the same league and there are not so many of them. And that is why the Muslims have made so much headway…so far. I think, however, that some of us *are* starting to wise up.
ECAW says
Thanks for this very informative post DDA.
Babs Barron’s article was one of the first things I came across when I started looking into all this and still think it worth anyone’s time to absorb it, particularly Guardian readers, but how to get them to do it? They would rather pluck out their eyeballs than actually investigate the claims made by all those ghastly phobes outside the pen.
I shall investigate Frankfurt on lies and bullshit. It seems an important distinction. I am always struck by the disregard for honesty, facts or logic in the posts by Muslims here and elsewhere. It takes a while to appreciate the profound difference between the Judaeo-Christian assumptions we take for granted and those which come from Islam, and particularly from the capricious character of Allah. “His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.” as Pope Benedict got into so much trouble for pointing out. No need for cause and effect, no need for the baseline of truthfulness. Allah can do what he wants and following his will comes first and last for his slaves.
I thought Khalid Mahmood’s response to Lord Pearson was a good example of bullshit. Such obviously baseless assertions irritate the likes of us but are good enough for the unthinking and uninterested who can’t be bothered to investigate them:
“It’s very difficult for people to take this guy seriously when he makes such bizarre claims. The prophet always made the point to be at peace with people and he didn’t convert anybody by force. These statements are absolutely incorrect.”
BTW, Shame about the cricket (this is a lie). I’m sure you’ll recover (this is bullshit).
TediNeo98 says
The irony in all of this is that it is going to take the killing of someone prominent, or another mass killing of civilians, or an uprising in the muslim enclaves in Birmingham, London etc for the government to finally wake up…or will it?
There is no doubt that the future holds more death and destruction with Islam as the perpetrator as it tries to build the caliphate governed by sharia law in the UK.
It’s laughable that they call this “the religion of peace” – what a joke.
Dave J says
The health and welfare of non-Muslims means less than nothing to the invaders.
They just want to kill you.
Matthieu Baudin says
The Queens eldest son is himself a champion of appeasement; his mother on the other hand remembers the second world war and the cost that comes with wilful blindness.
citycat says
If this is attempted, or happens, or this threat suffices, and things turn, then the Muslim English may be wise to become Atheist or wotever, perhaps secretly, and become a spanner in the Islamic Machinery, if it goes off, that is.
I know that is not easy with Muslims having being indoctrinated since birth, and mentally conditioned to view Islam in a light that filters out all morality, and all compassion for their fellow Earthlings, and are in the sexual trap of the misogynistic orgasmic “PEACE” of the religious order of ALLAH the pagan god now with a slightly different name than it was before being changed to Allah.
Leaving religion is like to rip out a part of one’s life.
It is going to happen at death anyway, so one may as well have the life for oneself.
Save one’s life for oneself. Stop some entity stealing it.
Stop the theft, find the thief.
Salome says
I think the ‘head off’ in the heading may not be entirely appropriate . . .
wallace says
Prince Charlie has been reading the Quran , he has Islamic scholars helping him understand the finer points. I am pretty sure they would have reassured him that there was no possibility that a plot was underway to hurt his mammy, and if there was it would be by those pesky joos,
Uncle Vladdi says
I bet he’s tired of waiting for her to die and so he paid them to off her sooner LOL!
Bronson says
Apart from the fact that her idiot dhimmi son would ascend the throne and Camilla become his consort I wonder if in the long run an attempt, even more so a successful attempt on the life of Her Majesty might not be a good thing. In other words it might be what is needed to shake the dhimmi British establishment out of its self imposed willful blindness. Her Majesty has been willing to let her Kingdom be surrendered without a word so alive she has been useless. Perhaps by dying she might serve her Subjects rather than dishing them up to the immans, rather like a latter day Herod allowing John The Baptist to be beheaded despite his misgivings.
nolongerdhimmi says
How come European countries refuse to help the persecuted Middle East Christians and
appease those barbarians instead?
peggy says
Jaladhi says
August 9, 2015 at 10:10 am
Agree, RonB!! We are humans and not monsters a la Nazis!! We can’t become monsters to eliminate monsters!!
=========================
Then you’re not going to eliminate them.
How do you think they cure Cancer? The chemicals in therapy is just as bad if given to a healthy person.
If you want a soft approach to appear civilized then you’ve lost the war. We are not dealing with normal humans. They are different to any other human on this planet and you think you can defeat them by sticking to some rules.
voegelinian says
It depends on the nature of the enemy, and the nature of the war. The West can, and should, avoid genocide. During WW2, the nature of the enemy and of the war they fomented tragically necessitated that we bomb German and Japanese cities filled with civilians. If WW2 had never happened, or if people had forgotten it, and then hypothetically you asked the typical Counter-Jihad Softy in 1941 (I guess they would be the Counter-Nazi Softy at that point in time) whether the West could conceivably ever bomb the shit out of German and Japanese cities, mass-killing hundreds of thousands of men, women and children in horrific fire-storms — or if even worse, you broached the potential, given the horrific and evil bellicosity of the Nazis and Japanese Shintos — the typical Counter-Nazi Softy would chide you and wring their hands about the Geneva accords and Hague conventions on the ongoing adjudication of the legalities of war.
Now, one thematic problem with modern wars seems to be a pattern noticed by certain historians; namely, that at any moment in time when war is looming, strategists and politicos tend to think the next war will be “like the last war”. World War One made that mistake; World War Two made that mistake; and in a way, that mistake was made during the Cold War, insofar as we did not realize how adept at espionage and bluffing lies (Communist “taqiyya”) the Soviets were, probably prolonging that war a decade or two longer than it had to. Our current war has been shaping up to follow this inept strategy. For one thing, our side doesn’t even know it’s at war yet! Indeed, our representatives (and many if not most of their civilians) keep insisting we are “not at war with Islam”. Many other features of this current world war we are in present a curious asymmetry unique in the history of warfare. See my essay:
Asymmetrical World Ward
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2014/04/asymmetrical-world-war.html
One of those asymmetries involves the fact that
1) there are millions of the enemy inside our borders
2) Most of this enemy resembles a non-combatant population
3) Most of this enemy appears to be “ethnic” in the perspective of the dominant worldview of the West — which worldview also is irrationally wired to “respect” this “ethnic” people (or wonderful diversity of “ethnic” peoples) past the point of all reason (cf., General Casey’s Dictum — that as horrific as the Fort Hood slaughter was, it would be worse to “sacrifice diversity”).
#1– #3 in turn are directly connected to the stubborn resistance and denial to the fact that we are, indeed, at war against Islam (if only because Islam is at war with us).
These three features of our world war are important parts of yet another singular feature of this war — namely, that
4) it involves a war of ideas amongst ourselves, where a minority of the West is trying to wake up, educate, and persuade the majority of the West to the dire exigency of this war, and its complex array of dynamic. This particular feature is not unique: in many ways, the West went through this in the ramp-up to WW2 (the gold standard being Churchill valiantly trying to rouse a Great Britain in appeasement mode to take the initiative to stop Hitler), though of course our situation has many different facets — for example, the majority in appeasement mode seems far more entrenched politically, culturally, and psychologically, for a variety of unique reasons (e.g., the collective PTSD the West suffers with regard to its perennial enemy, the Mohammedans, who terrorized and traumatized the West for over 1,000 years — resulting in a semi-conscious response of flinching, whitewashing Denial).
Given 1, 2, 3 and 4, and given the fact that we do have an ideal of civilization, and we cannot simply round up and genocide the Muslim enemy in our midst; nor can we bomb them as they live in our cities (we would have to bomb our own cities, for one thing), we have to consider what else we would do. It’s wonderfully convenient for the Counter-Jihad Softies that in their minds, apparently, the majority of the Muslim enemy within our borders is somehow less dangerous than the Muslims “over there” (after all, they behave less dangerously, so there ya go!) — just less dangerous enough (how convenient!) for them to feel on the moral and pragmatic high ground when they dig in stubbornly to oppose total deportation.
JawsV says
“Why has not the immigration stopped?
I don’t understand.”
Because apparently Europe has gone nuts.
Uncle Vladdi says
Wouldn’t surprise me to learn that “Dhimmi Prince Chuckie” is paying them to off her!