Zee News begins this story with this assertion: “After massacring hundreds and thousands of Christians, the Islamic State rulers have now decided to allow them the right to live, provided they sign ‘Dhimma’ contract, follow its 11 strict rules, and pay Jizyah tax.”
That sentence gives the impression that the Islamic State had originally intended to kill all the Christians, and has now changed its mind and is letting some of them live. That is not the case. The Islamic State offered dhimmitude, the state of subjugation under the rule of Islamic law, to the Christians from the beginning, demanding from them the jizya soon after conquering the territories where they lived. But at that time the Christians refused or fled the area, making them, in the eyes of the Islamic State, kuffar harbi, Infidels at war with Islam, who according to Islamic law should be killed.
The Christians who remained in Islamic State domains, however, and were not refusing the Islamic State’s demands, were able to take on dhimmi status. These rules listed below are not inventions of the Islamic State. They are as old as the concept of dhimmitude itself. Compare the Islamic State’s rules to the rules for dhimmis enunciated in Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveller), a classic manual of Islamic law:
O11.4: The Non-Muslim Poll Tax
The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon.
It is collected with leniency and politeness, as are all debts, and is not levied on women, children, or the insane.
O11.5
Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:
-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
-4- must keep to the side of the street;
-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
O11.6
They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).
O11.7
A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances, or enter any other mosque without permission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches without their permission).
O11.8
It is obligatory for the caliph (def: o25) to protect those of them who are in Muslim lands just as he would Muslims, and to seek the release of those of them who are captured.
Every provision of the Islamic State’s rules is in there.
More on this story. “Islamic State: 11 ‘Dhimma’ rules that Christians must obey to stay alive,” Zee News, September 5, 2015:
Istanbul: After massacring hundreds and thousands of Christians, the Islamic State rulers have now decided to allow them the right to live, provided they sign ‘Dhimma’ contract, follow its 11 strict rules, and pay Jizyah tax.
Dhimma of [sic] Dhimmi s [sic] a historical term referring to non-Muslim citizens of an Islamic state. The word literally means “protected person”. A person has to sign a Dhimma contract and pay Jizyah (levied by a Muslim State from its non-Muslim residents) to become eligible to be protected under Islamic Law.
As per a report by the Middle East Media Research Institute, dozens of Christians from Al-Qaryaten city signed a Dhimma contract to safeguard their lives and interests.
11 rules for Dhimmis:
1. Christians may not build churches, monasteries, or hermitages in the city or in the surrounding areas.
2. They may not show the cross or any of their books in the Muslims’ streets or markets, and may not use amplifiers when worshiping or during prayer.
3. They may not make Muslims hear the reciting of their books or the sounds of church bells, which must be rung only inside their churches.
4. They may not carry out any act of aggression against ISIS, such as giving refuge to spies and wanted men. If they come to know of any plot against Muslims, they must report it.
5. They must not perform religious rituals in public.
6. They must respect Muslims and not criticize their religion.
7. Wealthy Christians must pay an annual jizya of four gold dinars; middle-class Christians must pay two gold dinars, and the poor must pay one. Christians must disclose their income, and may split the jizya into two payments.
8. They may not own guns.
9. They may not engage in commercial activity involving pigs or alcohol with Muslims or in Muslim markets, and may not drink alcohol in public.
10. They may maintain their own cemeteries.
11. They must abide by ISIS dress code and commerce guidelines.

Abbasid Aleppo says
And we know these are the “Condition of Omar/Pact of Omar” from abt 637 to 720 AD.
john spielman says
this is simply the Pact of Umar; an evil sharia based apartheid fascist proclamation that has existed in the religion of DEATH since the beginning. maybe Nancy Pelosi and the San Francisco mayor and council can introduce it to the libtards to see how the feel about their “religion of peace” after wards
Arthur says
I’d like to see a survey done in the West asking people whether these rules (or which ones) are “fair,” and ones that they would be willing to abide by. My bet is, the politically correct majority who dislike Christian proselytizing would only object to the dress code and tax–and then only lightly. And when they come to learn that the tax rates are $163, $326, and $654 annually (by my calculations from a gold price of $1200/oz = 31.1g), they would probably be overjoyed to sign up for ‘protection’ under such cheap rates which they would compare to their homeowner’s insurance or property tax.
Of course, not mentioned in the contract is that Muslims have no similar reciprocal restrictions and the dhimmis do not vote, cannot (practically at least) bring legal action against Muslims, have no freedoms of speech, assembly, or relocation, etc. Oh, but who uses those things on a daily basis anyway??
Of course, if the rules stated that dhimmis had to take parking spaces furthest from the mall doors, stand in separate, slower and longer lines at Starbucks, and couldn’t sit in the best seats at movies, then there would be moral outrage–coming, alas, too late after the Dhimma has been signed. It’s often that way in a pact with the devil, of course.
Westman says
Since the American average income per capita is 56k and that of Syria is 2.8k those jizya numbers need to be multiplied by 56/2.8 to find the equivalent “bite”. $3260, $6520, and $13080.
Papa Whiskey says
8. They may not own guns.
This, in a region where every male out of toddlerhood struts around with a Kalashnikov. Why am I not surprised?
“The man who attempts, plans, or even wishes to disarm me must be regarded as my mortal enemy. … I, for one, will not be disarmed. Not while I live. Mark that well.”
— Jeff Cooper, in his stinging 1972 rejoinder to then New York Police Commissioner Patrick Murphy’s call for the disarmament of Americans
Angemon says
What if they know of a plot by muslims against muslims? Under islamic law, the word of a Christian is not admissible in court.
Angemon says
Also:
Something tells me that the 4 dinars for “wealthy” Christians was not a value agreed upon by both parties…
Jaladhi says
Where are the stupid Western leaders and media?? Sleeping as usual or going out and lecturing their own citizens how selfish we are for accepting refugees from the lands ruled by ISIS – is it still the fantasy Daesh as Kerry likes to call them!! The West is totally clueless when dealing with these murderers and is more interested in feeling guilty for ruling those poor Muslims for some time in the past while not mentioning any of the past and present atrocities of Muslims!! Morons, morons, morons…
Truth Seeker says
Unfortunately Europe and America are Bent Upon Getting These Rules for them for which they Actively Welcoming Jihadis who pretend as Refugees. Otherwise also in Administration, Infiltrated Influential Islamic Trojan Horses are present to pave the way for jihadis through the Administrators.
Paul says
Trojan Horse is the right analogy.I wonder why the leaders are abetting the destruction of all the values that Europeans have cherished so long. jHave they forgotten the price they have paid after letting the Jehadists settle in Europe and America.?
Karen says
“It [the pol tax] is collected with leniency and politeness, as are all debts, and is not levied on women, children, or the insane.”
Noblesse oblige. They treat their slaves well.
Herman says
And that is a lie as well…
Christians were humiliated while and when that tax was collected.
Plus as soon as one of the Christians did not obey the rules, ALL Christian would be punished.
There is NO protection whatsoever with this ‘contract’
gravenimage says
All true, Herman. The Dhimma is meant to humiliate and oppress. Moreover, as you note, life under the Dhimma is never secure, but always threatened. It also makes dhimmis police themselves, lest any “offence” by anyone in the community lead to widespread collective punishment from violent Muslims.
Fr. Basil says
Give me the dhimma rule list, and i’ll wipe my nose–or something else–with it.
jayell says
Very nice. Now I suggest that we in the West draw up a corresponding set of rules for THEM and see what happens. Should be very interesting.
Bob says
That would be “islamophobic”
revereridesagain says
Despite what “Arthur” and others of the “only Christians are brave, virtuous, and principled” crowd may believe, I and most of the other Objectivist (look it up if you don’t know) atheists I know would be too busy going into hiding or trying to break out of jail for having violated the jizya, gun ownership, free speech, roof raising, no-Isis-butt-kicking, dress code, sidewalk, pork and alcohol, “adultery” (since it includes any love outside of arranged marriages), Islam criticizing and, though unspecified, drawing Mohammed prohibitions to give y’all too much help with the church building and evangelizing, though I sure would miss the bell ringing,
When I was a little girl, I and some of my friends who were being raised Christian were generously admitted as members to our local YMHA/YWHA, hands down the best place in town for kids to hang out. I soon found myself president of something called the Kuffar Harbi Girls. I didn’t really know the meaning then, but does that mean I’ve been “an infidel at war with Islam” since I was about 10?
Woot!
RonaldB says
“Objectivist…atheists … would be too busy going into hiding or trying to break out of jail for having violated the jizya, gun ownership…”
revereridesagain,
I hope I didn’t change the meaning of your statement with all the ellipses.
Actually, you wouldn’t have to specify any reasons for being hunted and suppressed in an Islamic domain. The simple fact of being atheist would more than suffice for being hunted down and killed, if you didn’t convert to Islam.
Arthur says
RevereRidesAgain,
You gave me a good chuckle! I said nothing about “only Christians are …”, that’s all your invention. I am familiar with Objectivism, Ayn Rand, etc., so I’ve no need to look it up or for lengthy explanations.
My point was really that most people I know, at least the more educated ones I work with who live in the middle class or better circumstances here in the U.S., would be quick to relinquish rights they do not perceive as necessary for themselves or important to satisfy their immediate needs. I find few people stand up for principles of any sort these days–they’re more worried about getting “cheated” and how to get “ahead.” For an atheist, banning public proselytizing would be no inconvenience and might even be seen as a positive. I know at least one co-worker who has disdain for all religion and denies a difference between Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, etc. and says the earth would be better if they were all outlawed. He would fully support IS rules 1, 2, 3, 5, & 6. But surely you agree that freedom of religion is a fundamental right we should not surrender, even as an atheist? Without freedom of religion, you cannot choose to be atheist.
Sadly, the Dhimma contract doesn’t really tell the whole story about who has rights and who doesn’t under Islam. It is just another deception to divide and conquer. Islam tells the ‘people of the book’ they are “safe” to avoid taking on everyone at once, but eventually all non-Muslims are targeted for elimination.
I think the original Dhimma contract also specified that non-Muslims were prohibited from reading or studying the Koran and other Islamic documents. Technology seems to have overcome that obstacle nowadays, but I’m surprised IS didn’t make a try for it. Ironically, virtually everyone has access to a summary of the Koran nowadays, but still very few people bother to educate themselves and choose, instead, to trust the words of the ‘expert’ imams since they describe rainbows and unicorns.
I suppose it might even be more strategic (from an Islamic point of view) for the dhimma to permit only atheism and prohibit all non-atheist, non-Islam beliefs, but of course Islam is kind of locked in to its present strategy as per immutable written word.
voegelinian says
Don’t forget the crucial rider in the Koran verse on the jizya. From eleven translations of Koran 9:29:
Pickthall—Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
Yusuf Ali—Fight those who believe not in God nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Hilali-Khan—Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Shakir—Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
Sher Ali—Fight those from among the people of the Book, who believe not in ALLAH, nor in the Last Day, nor hold as unlawful what ALLAH and HIS Messenger have declared to be unlawful, nor follow the true religion, until they pay the tax considering it a favour and acknowledge their subjection.
Khalifa—You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth – among those who received the scripture – until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly.
Arberry—Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled.
Palmer—Fight those who believe not in God and in the last day, and who forbid not what God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who do not practice the religion of truth from amongst those to whom the Book has been brought, until they pay the tribute by their hands and be as little ones.
Rodwell—Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.
Sale—Fight against them who believe not in God, nor in the last day, and forbid not that which God and his apostle have forbidden, and profess not the true religion, of those unto whom the scriptures have been delivered, until they pay tribute by right of subjection, and they be reduced low.
************
As Andrew Bostom has documented, this rider manifested itself in cruel and unusual treatment of dhimmis throughout Islamic history:
“…on offering up the jizya, the dhimmi must hang his head while the official takes hold of his beard and hits [the dhimmi] on the protruberant bone beneath his ear [i.e., the mandible]… their houses may not be higher than the Muslim’s, no matter how low that is. The dhimmi may not ride an elegant horse or mule; he may ride a donkey only if the saddle-work is of wood. He may not walk on the good part of the road. They [the dhimmis] have to wear [an identifying] patch [on their clothing], even women, and even in the [public] baths…[dhimmis] must hold their tongue. ”
“…dhimmis…always lived on sufferance, exposed to the caprices of the ruler and the passions of the mob…in later times..[t]hey were much more liable to suffer from the violence of the crowd, and the popular fanaticism was accompanied by an increasing strictness among the educated.”
Bostom goes on to mention historian S.D. Goitein, in essays published in 1963 and 1970, who highlighted the economic and other adverse social consequences of both the jizya itself, and the attendant regulations of the system of dhimmitude:
“…consideration [of] the immense extent of poverty and privation experienced by the masses, and in particular, their persistent lack of cash, which turned the ‘season of the tax’ into one of horror, dread, and misery.”
In another essay, Bostom mentions the great Muslim writer Tabari’s description of the tax-collection process:
The dhimmis [non-Muslim tributary’s] posture during the collection of the jizya- “[lowering themselves] by walking on their hand, …reluctantly…
I.e., they would make the Christian or Jew walk on all fours on the floor, in order to humiliate them at the time of collecting jizya.
As the blogger Sheikh Yer Mami has documented (and I’ve also seen Bostom report this, though I can’t find it now):
As the learned Qazi Mughis-ud-din declared, in accordance with the teachings of the books on Canon Law: ‘The Hindus are designated in the Law as ‘payers of tribute’ (kharaj-guzar); and when the revenue officer demands silver from them, they should, without question and with all humility and respect, tender gold. If the officer throws dirt into their mouths, they must without reluctance open their mouths wide to receive it. By these acts of degradation are shown the extreme obedience of the zimmi [dhimmi], the glorification of the true faith of Islam, and the abasement of false faiths. God himself orders them to be humiliated , (as He says, ‘till they pay jaziya) with the hand and are humbled…The Prophet has commanded us to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive…
And:
The late … [Indian] scholar K.S. Lal records this translation:
‘…and should the [tax] collector choose to spit into his mouth, opens the same without hesitation, so that the official may spit into it..’ Lal notes, further that , “Actual spitting in the mouth of the non-Muslims was not uncommon”. Lal cites a poem by Vijaya Gupta (1493-1519 C.E.), which includes the line, ‘The peons employed by the qazis tore away the sacred threads of the Brahmans and spat saliva in their mouths’.
http://sheikyermami.com/2008/04/the-dhimmi-dhimmitude/
Aside from these various cruel & unusual treatments expressing the baseline hatred and fanatical superiority complex of the Mohammedans in putting their Koran into action, they also had a deeper goal. I know Andrew Bostom has written an essay in which he quotes an Islamic scholar explicitly describing the deeper goal — to kill the soul of the dhimmi over time; but I cannot locate that essay now. Another Jihad Watch reader has previously adverted to another scholar who argued this as well — Rev Dr Mark Durie who goes into this ritual of humiliation – and its devastating psycho-spiritual effect on the dhimmis, as it was inflicted generation after generation – in his book “The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom”.
Mo says
@ revereridesagain
“Despite what “Arthur” and others of the “only Christians are brave, virtuous, and principled” crowd may believe, ”
Provide the evidence where Arthur said or even implied any such thing.
RonaldB says
The dhimmi status is only for Christians, Jews, and possibly Zoroastrians, although the Sunni Islamic State is unlikely to recognize the Zoroastrian possibility. Oh, and Shi’ites, and Shi’ite derivatives such as Alewites, and Sufis, Amadiyya, Druze and Ba’hai will have their throats slit immediately.
That means that atheists, Hindus, Wiccans, Buddhists, Taoists, Confucians, animists, and other non-Christian sects will either convert or die. I guess the more unorthodox branches of Christianity such as Mormons, Anabaptists, Mennonites, or Amish will have to negotiate their status.
In line with our growing realization of the non-compatibility of mutually-exclusive creeds, such as Islam and representative government, I have no real objection to Muslims in Muslim countries setting conditions for non-Muslim residents, as long as we get to set conditions for our own Muslims. This includes
1) Immediate deportation of non-citizen Muslims;
2) Cessation of all Muslim immigration, including family reunions;
3) Silencing of the public calls to prayer, and the banning of eyesores like the Mosque tower muezzins;
4) Banning of foreign contributions for the furtherance of Islam;
5) Immediate banning of paid sharia courts, formal or informal, statutory or advisory;
6) Banning of any concealing garments from public display;
7) Closing of any Muslim school teaching doctrines contrary to the Constitution, or not fostering good American citizenship;
8) Unlimited right to investigate mosques and Islamic groups, including the use of informants. The laws against entrapment will still apply;
The appropriate list goes on and on and on…
We are rapidly entering a time when countries, to survive, must explicitly take steps to ensure the survival of their people and culture. Given that the one and only objective of Islam is to spread itself, akin to the AIDS virus, some of its rules might be worth examining.
ben t. says
We are on the same page! I am proud to be called an “islamphobe”.
voegelinian says
You’re incorrect. In Islamic history, the dhimma pact was extended to Zoroastrians and Hindus, effectively making them also People of the Book.
TheDane says
Poor Christians in the Middle East! I pray for you, and I wish that the West would airlift you all out of that demons’ nest called Arabia!! But the West is about to be flooded totally by this horrid, evil people, the moslems, and we will probably soon be subjugated to the same evil here. Don’t think it cannot happen; just take a look at crazy, lunatic Europeans that greet the moslem invaders with flags, flowers, clothes and food! No one seems to be thinking of the Christians that are left behind in horrible Syria.. It is unbearable! I loathe Europa, Merkel and Obama!! Loathe and despise! Hippocrates!
AnneM says
Lock and load Americans, lock and load.
Kepha says
It seems that nowadays in the secular West, we Christians aren’t allowed to criticize either Islam or sexual perversion.
Yes, I’m ready to lock and load. But I will also never forget that it was the supposed “brights” of our society who threw the doors open to Islam.
BTW, Revereridesagain, I don’t know who’s in the “Only Christians are brave, honorable, blah blah crowd.” We’re the religion that’s against boasting (See Paul to the Galatians), and for frank admission and confession of our sins.
Western Canadian says
“BTW, Revereridesagain, I don’t know who’s in the “Only Christians are brave, honorable, blah blah crowd.” ”
To be expected from someone who thinks that only atheists are brave, honourable, etc…..
abad says
Precisely why Muslims NEED to be segregated and isolated from the rest of the world.
They can keep their sandbox. Just stay out of the rest of the world.
Alissa says
Too late!
Tbone says
That is the only sane thing that will work.
Matthieu Baudin says
Muslims are clearly special people; one set of laws for them to follow and another set for the subjugated ‘outsiders’. And then there are the outright slaves of conquest to consider.
One of the saddest things to face is that there is no shortage of supposedly enlightened folk who are prepared to accommodate this slide back into the past, who are thereby helping to facilitate this savage attack against our expanding and successful universal civilisation.
Edward says
These errant bastards have no respect towards those that possess the highest dignity….dignity is a virtue none existent to those imposing their immoral low-grade human nature if they can be identified as such or worse!
In a moment of desperation after reflecting of what’s happening in the ME I wrote these personal pensive thoughts below three or four days ago. Questioning as to why we are falling victims to a false myth that has no sustainable substance to establish any reasonable authority towards humans. I’m grateful that this JW post was published making it possible to share this thought along with other comments.
———————————————
Recently I came across this quote: “The Creator is a Creator, not a destroyer.” – José Silva
It stands to reason that the Creator mentioned by Mr. Silva would be a Creator that espouses AGAPE LOVE to all of His creations. Saying that all creations of His were created in His Image and endowed with our entire Creator’s righteous attributes. Love does not equate to death as in the case of the Islamic religion.
As a true God who endows free will, He Who does not demand submission is a God that will see all His creations, who wills to return to His fold.
In contrast a pseudo god who demands complete submission to him and does not allow a free will to his adherents will not see the return of many of his fold; for only he has the free will……to kill those that don’t submit to him!
“The [TRUE] Creator is a Creator, not a destroyer.”
———————————————-
Agape Love: translated as “love: the highest form of love, especially brotherly love, charity; the love of God for man and of man for God
Conclusion: Islam is a myth with these false man-made unreasonable attributes
Myth: “a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature. – Dictionary.com
Reason: a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc.:
It’s time to end respect or fear of a nonexistent ghost religion, islam
gravenimage says
This is straight out of the oppressive 7th-century Pact of Umah–the only thing that has been changed is the original reference that Christians “shall not mount on saddles, nor shall we gird swords nor bear any kind of arms nor carry them on our- persons” has been updated to include a reference to guns.
God, I hate Islam.
Westman says
These Daesh mental-midgets don’t realize that they have won the booby prize. The real wealth, the mentally gifted, are leaving in the refugee brain drain. Without the oil they’ve stolen, the economic path for Daesh is down.
The economies of the non-oil-producing states will never get better under Islam because they throw away the minds of the women and for the young men, substitute the madrassas for a real education.
Daesh is a parasite on an already deficient system. A boycott of Daesh-controlled oil, or destruction of their oil fields, would soon bring collapse and should be considered by the West.
Edward says
“A boycott of Daesh-controlled oil, or destruction of their oil fields, would soon bring collapse and should be considered by the West.”
Totally Agree!
gravenimage says
Pious Muslims don’t care how much their actions hurt the economy, Westman–they want to be top of the heap, no matter how low that heap might be.
particolor says
And the 11 Democratic Rules in 1 for Muzzo’s in a Democratic Country are..
1 to 11…FUCK OFF ! 🙂
STEVE says
Islam is a filthy, hate filled, sexist, racist, homophobic, 11th century sewer religion and has only, repeat only, been legitimized and “accepted” in the last 40 years due to the $$$$$$$$$$$$$ coming into to those backwards, hate mongering nations through their oil production. Western nations from 1970 on have treated these “kings and shieks” from these sewer nations as actual royalty while allowing their butchering practices of their so called religion to not only go on unchecked in their own nations but to actually gain destructive, kudzu type footholds in every other country in the world. It’s all real, it’s all fact and you can accept it or not, $$$$$$$$ talks and if these muslim nations did not have it, they would be regarded as the murdering, terroristic lunatics they are, and would dealt with as just that, murdering, thieving, cowards…period.
MORT says
Hey STEVE – – – did you forget that Thomas Jefferson took up arms against them long ago ???
T.T.S says
These rules will come to USA within 75 year’s time if we continue to take in Muslim refugees who will surely turn against non-Muslim host societies which accepted them compassionately. Now, Islamization of EU is in earnest by so-called migrant crisis initiated by Muslims. This migrant crisis only a strategy of Islamic goals of achieving eventual dominance over non-Muslim world by long-term demographic conquest in terms of increased population ratio versus non-Muslims. If we look at all so-called refugees coming into the shores of Greece or passing through Hungary toward Germany, you can see real faces of these people even though there are a few genuine refugees. It is indeed difficult to understand why wealthy Gulf Arab countries never come out to offer help to these people even though they have all the resources. The answer is very clear: The refugees do not need to go there as it is already al-dar-Islam(the land of Islam). They need to go to only al-dar-harb(the land of non-Muslim Kaffirs) to slowly transform it into Islam.
The more we are ignorant of Islam and Islamic teachings along with Islamic goals of achieving world dominancy, we are still going to be confused and eventually subjugated in the long-term. Our coming generations together with our way of life is going to be defeated under creeping Islamization. IGNORANCE OF ISLAM AND ITS GOALS, ITS STRATEGIES WILL BE OUR DEFEAT.
gravenimage says
That sentence gives the impression that the Islamic State had originally intended to kill all the Christians, and has now changed its mind and is letting some of them live. That is not the case. The Islamic State offered dhimmitude, the state of subjugation under the rule of Islamic law, to the Christians from the beginning, demanding from them the jizya soon after conquering the territories where they lived. But at that time the Christians refused or fled the area, making them, in the eyes of the Islamic State, kuffar harbi, Infidels at war with Islam, who according to Islamic law should be killed.
………………………..
Extraordinarily important point–this is *not* a sign that ISIS has “mellowed”–institutionalized oppression of Christians was always the goal.
And note that simply fleeing Islam makes an Infidel a Kuffar Harbi–one need not actually fight Muslims, just resist them in any way, even passively. This is because, as Muslims see it, the whole world should be under Islamic rule.
voegelinian says
Another factor not considered apparently is the pragmatic expedient necessity into which ISIS plunged by virtue of the fact that they were taking the bull by the horns and beginning an expansionist conquest. In the beginning stages of such a cataclysmic undertaking — particularly in a broader context of relative Islamic weakness vis-a-vis the West (which continues to have presence & influence in the region of Iraq & Syria) — it is understandable that ISIS would feel the need to strike some bold moves of plunder & massacre. I.e., it’s not as though they just decided to institute a Caliphate at a placid board meeting, then went out to deal with the Jews and Christians all around them in some bureaucratic process in accord with the Sunna. They had a war of conquest to initiate, in which they not only wanted to take land as a stepping stone to Islamic expansion, but also wanted to make vivid demonstrations of terror in their first splash(es) of carving & marking out their inauguration of this latest phase of the global revival of Islam that has been more broadly unfolding in diverse ways throughout the post-WW2 20th century — and then more tumultuously and zealously post-911 into the 21st century.
Thus, if ISIS doesn’t at ever moment behave in scrupulous accord with Sunna stipulations, it’s only because of pragmatic concerns vis-a-vis 1) their ultimate Islamic goals + 2) exigencies of factors beyond their control from which they have to violently and aggressively wrest control that may not ideally suit at every given moment a by-the-numbers accordance with the letter of the Sharia law.
Proud Khenzeer says
Any of these muslim fools can kiss my butt. Even the prophet himself can pucker up. I am a Texas and an American and I bow to no one.
albert says
Both Pakistan and Indonesia have laws saying that Christians must not fight with muslims which effectively means that Christians have no right of self defence and have been given the death sentence in both countries for defending themselves and their families when attacked, both of these countries receive substantial aid from the west, if our leaders wanted we could make this aid dependent on giving Christians their human rights.
Raj Ambardar says
This is nothing new, it is just people do not care when they live in their comfort zone and wake only up when it is so close, perhaps too late for some.
Muslims have done this in each and every place or in the country where they had the ultimat rule on infidels. It happend in Afghanistan, India especially in Kashmir where Hindus had to pay Tax for going to their Temples.
In Pakistan all Infidels forcibly converted or wiped out and have terrorist camps openly on its soil against infidels.
These are the Ultimate Real Values of Islam when they are in Majority over Infidels,
Randy Sperger says
How can we get some of your articles like this one, books other documents translated into Spanish for Latin America? I have a friend who is a very professional quality translator that could help us get the job done. Much of Latin American is largely asleep on these issues and quite defenseless. I live in Costa Rica and our politicians and spiritual leaders seem almost totally ignorant about the dangers of political Islam and “steath jihad” which I know is going on here.