The video below shows some of the incitement that led to this lawsuit. While counter-jihadists are frequently suspended or have their pages taken down altogether from Facebook, this naked incitement to hatred and murder is just fine in Zuckerbergland. No incitement to murder, no calls for violence against innocent civilians, should ever be tolerated against anyone. But when it comes to inciting violence against Israelis, it seems to be fine with almost everyone.
“20,000 Israelis sue Facebook for Palestinian incitement,” by Edna Adato, Israel Hayom, October 27, 2015:
Citing incitement against Israel, Shurat Hadin Israel Law Center on Tuesday submitted a lawsuit against Facebook in a New York court on behalf of 20,000 Israelis. The lawsuit was submitted over claims that Facebook is facilitating incitement against Israelis and encouragement to harm them.
At the onset of the current wave of terror, Shurat Hadin, which works to fight terrorism on the legal front, began a petition to recruit thousands of Israeli under the title: “Suing Facebook — Disconnecting Terror.”
The organization is asking the court in New York to issue an injunction against Facebook to remove the inciting pages, monitor the methods of incitement and block them, and hold the social networking giant responsible for allowing terrorists on its network.
“Facebook has the means to research and monitor every word that appears on its website. It cannot be that entire pages on Facebook are devoted to incitement to murder Jews and that terrorists are permitted to publish posts that become popular among their friends and encourage them to kill. It is absurd that Facebook is being transformed into a tool for supporting incitement and attacks against Jews, and we intend to put an end to it,” said Shurat Hadin.
According to the plaintiffs, “The terrorists do not come on their own. They write posts and encourage their friends to kill Jews. Facebook has been transformed into an anti-Semitic incubator for murder.”
As one example, Shurat Hadin cited the case of 19-year-old terrorist Muhannad Halabi, who wrote on his Facebook page, “I want to become a martyr,” prior to carrying out a stabbing attack the following day. Halabi stabbed Aharon Bennett and Rabbi Nehemia Lavi to death.
Attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, director of Shurat Hadin, said that “for every Israeli that is sitting now at home — there is something that can be done against terror. Join us now. This action is important in the same way as actions to increase security on the ground and its goal is to stop the terror. Today, Facebook has become a haven for terrorists: They publish their actions on their Facebook pages, garner support, receive instructions and direction to murder Jews — and all this under the sponsorship of a commercial company that has the power to stop it easily. At the time that Facebook suffices with words and tells us that it intends ‘to remove inciting pages’ — the website is filling up more and more each moment with severe incitement, and it is our task to do everything to stop this.”
cs says
Fucking animals.
Joseph says
YES….That is what the men are preoccupied with, fucking animals.
Now what about a comment on the article?
Just messin with ya CS
Don McKellar says
I wonder if Zuckerberg has sent them all gifts like he did for Clock Boy?
I guess it doesn’t occur to Zuckerberg where these moslems and their “holy” books stand on Jews and what they’d have in store for him as Allah commands? Willful ignorance is bliss when you’re rich and have massive security and complete separation from reality.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
What I wonder about is why all those anti-Jihad postings were summarily deleted and the incitement to murder Jews in Israel was left posted. Could it be that Zuckerberg, a Jew, but a liberal, which is to say an anti-freedom glob-socialist, is directly affected by the penalties that go with telling the truth about Moslems? Is he also affected by Islam’s implicit omnipresent threat of personal ruination, sever injury or even death for doing so? The lesson of Molly Norris is not lost on Zuckerberg, she’s still in hiding from the death fatwa on her. So is Salman Rushdie, whose book The Satanic Verses I read just after it was published and found it to be too kind to Moslems. Matt Stone and Trey Parker have averted going into forced hiding by dropping satire of Islam and instead focusing their sharp wit on… Mormons, they of the Judeo-Christian sect.
gavinwca says
Because Zuckerburg despises Israel and loves Obola’s jihadist Muslems, even when they are a bomber in training like clock boy.
Blitz2b says
Mark F*ck.an.iceberg is an Islam lapdog. How quickly he got on the bandwagon to pat Clock-boy and extend an invitation to him… Shame on you, you pathetic jerk.
I hope the Israelis win the lawsuit and drain your traitorous filthy rich a$$. How braindead does one have to be to not notice the difference between savages who are hell bent on death and destruction of the one and only democracy of the middle East, and the ones who are desperately hanging on to a tiny sliver of a land in a vast Sea of barbarism.
Instead of using your wealth to foster peace and freedom of the western civilization you encourage and facilitate the genocidal Islamic maniacs of pallywood to carry out their vicious plans.
ich says
WOW
Mothers who dont care about their dead children.
This is wrong on so many levels.
Comparing Jesus & Muhammed is certainly a study in contrasts.
I hope our countrie(s) will wake up soon.
Its like watching V for Vendetta
Michael Copeland says
JESUS WAS BORING
A personal view by A. Warner
Quite frankly, to an adventure-seeker like me,
Jesus was boring.
Look at the things he did NOT do.
I mean, he did not:
have a favourite sword with its own name,
make dawn raids on unsuspecting villages,
take prisoners,
demand ransom money,
take booty,
behead anyone, let alone 600 in a day,
kill anyone, or take part in stoning people,
have a fire lit on a captive’s chest
to make him say where the money was,
have men’s feet and hands cut off,
their eyes put out with hot nails and leave
them to die on hot desert rocks without water,
more on https://www.facebook.com/LibertyGBParty/posts/499505160166601
Dacritic says
Haha good one mate! On the other hand, Muhammad was also boring.
He did not make any prophecies.
He did not turn water into wine.
He did not cure any diseases.
He did not walk on water.
He did not calm any storm.
He did not expel any demons, or have any demons say to him, “Have you come to judge us?”
Though he most probably was entered into by demons.
He did not feed 5,000 people with a couple of fishes.
He did not raise the dead…though he of course indeed caused many to be dead.
He did not put somebody’s severed ear back.
Finally, he did not rise from the dead.
Joseph says
🙂 🙂 🙂
Good one
Evolution says
Great post !
marc says
We only have ourselves to blame, Facebook is an automated system, the jihadists and their useful idiot enablers have an army of dedicated Facebookers with multiple accounts that report posts that spoil their narrative in anyway or ridicule the pirate mohammad.
Facebook use algorithms that look at popularity of page, popularity and number of reporters, if the sum is high enough, they remove the post. Our enemy has placed spies into every counter jihadist group, checking members profiles for anything they can report.
We don’t have a network of such reporters, we tend to not even follow what they are upto, if we don’t tell them what to remove, they can’t do much.
I have two examples here:
Facebook have a cool method to scan images of swastikas, they only need a single report for to have that image removed. They are commonly seen in counter jihad posts where they are used to identify jihadists with there ideological brethren, hitlers nazis. when posted on Facebook on a jihadi monitored page or profile, they are taken down fast, but when the useful idiots superimpose a swastika on an Israeli flag, it remains. (if interested, just report as a hate symbol)
I was involved with a small counter jihadi mass reporting group a couple of years ago, and with a little hard work and coordination anything jihadi we set our minds to was taken down, normally within 24 hours. but the jihadis post far faster than that tiny group could ever report.
i wish them well in their legal battel of course, but i don’t think that is the answer.
RonaldB says
I think that posting should stay up.
This is a Muslim comedian, apparently with a respectable following. Their idea of humor is to play goofy music while they discuss ways of killing innocent Jews on the street. This is Muslim humor!!!!! I guess Muslim humor is to humor as Muslim law is to law, and Muslim charity is to charity…oh, and Muslim science is to science.
This is the culture of the Muslims in many countries. I’m not so sure the postings need to be taken down. I think the Muslims who are going to kill, will kill regardless of whether they see it on Facebook. On the other hand, it lets non-Muslims know what they’re up against. I say, leave the jihad postings (except those actually advocating the criminal act) and leave the anti-jihad. At the very least, the soon-to-be dhimmis in Western society will not be able to say that the evidence of their danger wasn’t right in front of their noses.
EYESOPEN says
Marc says: “i wish them well in their legal battel of course, but i don’t think that is the answer.”
You are right Marc; that will probably not work. What WOULD work is that if every site and every person who sees the danger boycott FACEBOOK. Just say “NO!” Refuse to use. Hit Suckerberg in the pocket – that’s where it will hurt that snot-nosed “elitist” the most.
KnowThyEnemy says
I don’t think it is a good idea to boycott Facebook. Boycotting would only be a 1% or so of membership hit to FB. On top of that, the sheeple will never get to read what the Islamo-realists have to say, and will stay stuck in their la-la land. Cutting ourselves off from the social-media world would definitely doom all our efforts.
We need to do the opposite and do it smart! Open two separate accounts at FB. Dedicate one account to the anti-Islam work and use the other one as personal one to connect with your friends, relatives, co-workers, etc. Facebook has a policy that a person must create his/her profile under his/her real name. A fictional profile (e.g.”Muhammad Sucks”) is shut down by FB if someone reports it.
So the smart thing to do is to create a profile with your real name for the anti-Islam account. Do NOT include any other information in the profile details that can give your identity away. Also for security/privacy reasons, do NOT become friends with anyone who is a “Friend” in your personal FB account, and vice-versa. My experience has been that it is not easy to report shut a FB profile unless some policy is violated. (Important note: Do NOT threaten anyone or advocate violence! Doing so is not only against FB policy but also against the law.)
As for your real/personal account, have whatever fancy profile-name you want to give it and include real details in the profile. People are unlikely to report it as long as one refrains from posting (or linking to) any anti-Islam stuff via this account. Make sure never to link to, or “Like” any posts / comments you made through your anti-Islam account.
A smart utilization of social-media is be much more effective at spreading awareness than boycotts.
Jon says
In other words, why use FB at all? I’ve used it several times, always using different nicknames but eventually always come up against that ID confirmation demand. I don’t post porn, and my views are those of the generality of ordinary people, so why the demand for total disclosure of my personal life?
I write letters to the newspapers and magazines who don’t demand verification of who I am. There are too many cases of people being scammed due to being too free with their personal detais, why would I willingly enter into that just for the ego-stroking delights of seeing my opinions on FB? Best to just re-log in to FB under a new nic until they come looking for you, and be prepared not to become Shakespeare by your musings remaining on FB for posterity.
KnowThyEnemy says
@Jon,
I think FB demands ID confirmations from you precisely because you use nicknames for your account. Use nickname only for the personal account and refrain from posting ‘controversial’ stuff via this account. For any other accounts…. the ones which you know will be reported by the ‘offended’, use your real name that matches the name for your e-mail (the one that you provide to FB). The chance of you getting a ID confirmation demand for such an account is very low.
Facebook pesters people to disclose all their information, but I don’t see why one has to provide anything more than a name and e-mail to open an FB account. I recall pressing the “Skip” and “Later” buttons for those questions and have never gotten an ID confirmation demand.
Bottomline: It is best to plan everything ahead of time before opening FB accounts, and provide them as few details as possible.
Angemon says
While I don’t think that Facebook is responsible for what its users decide to publish, I’ve heard many, many people relating similar experiences: they go to “Facebook prison” for criticizing islam and nothing happens to the users and pages they report inciting to jihad and hatred of non-muslims. And while they’re a privately owned business, they still operate under US law.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes. It would make more sense to make a LOT of noise in order to demand that there be free speech for *counter-jihadists*. That is: that if people wish to criticise Islam in their personal pages and in discussion with others, in connection with news items, etc, or post videos such as those produced by Pat Condell or Mr Spencer or Dave Woods or Bill Warner, this should be totally permitted.
So you would then on the one hand have all the jihadis and wannabes and camp followers letting it all hang out – where, every now and again, uninformed infidels can stumble across it and get one *hell* of a shock to find out what Muslims say amongst themselves when (forgetting that at FB the walls have eyes and ears) they think the dirty Kuffar aren’t listening – AND the critics of Islam *also* free to network and discuss matters (though if they’re smart they’ll make sure that they use maximum-level privacy settings and do NOTHING to jeopardise their own personal security or that of others, because, again, **the walls have ears**).
ballotcode says
Wasn’t Zuckerberg caught on an open mike with Merkel?
She was asking him to crack down on the “anti-migrant” rhetoric.
They are ca-hooting. So of course FB would allow incitement on one side while suppressing on the other.
It is becoming more and more important to be able to discern truth from fiction as serious attempts are being made to “shape reality” through the media.
Example, rewriting history of the Temple in Jerusalem.
It is critical that you know what you know and why you know it.
TheBuffster says
“Wasn’t Zuckerberg caught on an open mike with Merkel?
She was asking him to crack down on the “anti-migrant” rhetoric.
They are ca-hooting. So of course FB would allow incitement on one side while suppressing on the other.”
But that doesn’t really make sense. One way of inciting violence against Muslims is to allow jihad-minded Muslims to post praise and celebration of jihadist acts and advice and recommendations of committing murder against kafirs.
I doubt that Merkel or Zuckerberg are out to get Jews killed. But if they’re out to cover up the amount of Jew and kafir hatred we’re facing, leaving jihadist hate pages on Facebook would not be the way to do achieve their goal.
Don McKellar says
Merkel has lost her mind and Zuckerberg has lost his balls.
Those are two possibilities and there’s quite a bit of evidence for both.
Jay Boo says
If only we could combine Merkel’s balls with Zuckerberg’s mind.
Marken says
An interesting step, if Facebook continues to externalize their costs by relying on users to police posts and profiles when they should and are able to do it, or worse yet, ignore the reports of users who flag jihadi incitements, that practice is about to get more expensive as these suits will progress.
cheryl s. says
That Mark Zuckerberg is Jewish and sanctioning these barbarians to spread their sick message of Jew hatred and genocide on HIS platform is unbelievable!
He is, by virture of not shutting down these rabid dogs’ FB pages, condoning their worldwide call for the slaughter of innocent Jews.
Mr. Zuckerberg may be one of the wealthiest men on the planet but, he’s nothing more than a low life piece of garbage with major Jewish blood on his hands.
RonaldB says
You think Muslims need Facebook postings to want to kill Jews and other non-Muslims?
particolor says
NO !
dumbledoresarmy says
There *is* of course another side to this.
The Mohammedans, on FB, just like most everybody else, are tempted to “let it all hang out”.
Which means that it is *visible*, abundantly so.
And *that* means that it is quite readily visible to previously uninformed and clueless infidels – of which there are multitudes from all nations, wandering around on FB – and can lead to Awful Realization that Muslims – whether ‘palestinian’ Arab muslims or any other kind of Muslim really are NOT “folks just like us”. And every such moment of Awful Realization is a win for our side.
That an AWFUL lot of Muslims get off on beheading videos and gruesome stuff about slitting throats a and hating on the Jooooz, and also go in for truly horrible gross and vulgar obscenities and threats if anyone dares call them out on their BS in a FB comments thread.
If ALL the horrible postings were censored out, then no naive infidel would ever trip over them and get a salutary wake-up shock.
RonaldB says
Great reply, Dumbledoresarmy,
I agree with you completely. The more these things are posted, the more people support controlling our borders so we don’t let in these savages.
gravenimage says
True, DDA–and here are brave Israelis exposing Muslim incitement to murder–and doing so using Facebook:
“A how-to-kill-Jews video, from Palestinian terrorists in Gaza”
https://www.facebook.com/theisraelproject/videos/10154513451207316/
TheBuffster says
I was thinking along those lines as well, DDA.
Furthermore, those Facebook posts could serve – and I believe have served – as a means for law enforcement to become aware of dangerous people that need watching, or as a way to get clues about people who have already done a crime.
So I’m not sure what to think about this suit. Is Facebook more useful to jihadists or to government agencies fighting terrorism?
dumbledoresarmy says
I would BET my bottom dollar that Mossad and Shabak/ Shin Bet have Arabic-language-speaking and Farsi-speaking and other-muslim-country-language-speaking operatives sitting very, very quietly behind the bushes on FB and all other social media locations, keeping an eye and an ear on the ‘chatter’…and busy analysing who is saying what, to whom, where.
And, of course, everybody *else*’s ‘spooks’ would be doing the same – ASIO and AFP in Australia, MI5 in Britain…you-name-it.
mortimer says
Soliciting MURDER is a crime everywhere but in Muslim countries where HONOR KILLING is part of Islam and therefore rules law ABOVE the national constitution.
Soliciting GENOCIDE should be considered unacceptable hate speech.
Matthieu Baudin says
Good. The rest of us could learn something about the need for self assertion from today’s Israeli citizens.
We also don’t need to put up with the invective and other trash piled upon us by violent Jihadis and their apologists who think that they are a law unto themselves.
mortimer says
Mark Zuckerberg is the boss. He can do what ever he wants with Facebook.
I have a suggestion for him: ban anyone who solicits murder of Jews so that they will not be on Facebook ever again. I am not Jewish, but I would ban those who solicited murder of Jews! Why doesn’t he?
To me, that is reasonable…
dumbledoresarmy says
Alternatively, he can just ‘flag’ the more ‘interesting’ postings and forward them to Mossad and Shin Bet for their further attention.
Maybe he already is…
(teehee).
sidney penny says
“No incitement to murder, no calls for violence against innocent civilians, should ever be tolerated against anyone.”
That is the main point and you could add anywhere at the end.
Asian Crusader says
Facebook works very hard, and spends serious money, to delete posts that go against the political preferences of people to whom Mark Zuckerberg wants to suck up. (E.g George Soros, Barry Obama, Carlos Slim.)
Conversely, jihad posts calling for murder and mayhem by Muslims against non-Muslims are broadly tolerated. Ditto for calls for the annihilation of Israel, etc.
philip zhao says
Facebook is facelessly ashamed !
islam :- the hateful religion of peace says
I’m with dumbledoresarmy on this, I’m sure a lot of useful info is trawled from Facebook postings,,
Although to be honest, Facebook are as much to blame as kelshnicov, Toyota, & whoever make high explosives
If people object to this sort of hate and vile behaviour on social media, the simple way to get it taken down is forward the postings to the advertisers, asking them if they really want their products displayed in this way …
Haveing their advertising pulled will make Facebook take notice …
Jon says
Interesting, as one who is a member of several anti-Islamist groups on FB I don’t recall seeing any anti-Jewish/anti-Israel groups. In fact there is some very lively anti-Islamist discourse which I find encouraging given the all-too-common liberal/leftist narrative of denying any connection between Islam and terrorism.
UNCLE VLADDI says
You’re full of it, shill troll! I used to manage both the FUCKISLAM! and BAN ISLAM! Fasbook Groups for the first few years – until they were taken down as violating their terms, even after I’d made them “private!”
Since then, they’ve taken down anti-Ground Zero mosque groups with hundreds of thousands of members, and I’ve seen the JIDF’s near-endless lists of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish Arab/muslim-created groups, which were reported again and again, yet still stayed up, while the JIDF (Jewish Internet Defense Force) which only existed to expose Arab/muslim hate, was taken down and its author banned again and again!
gravenimage says
Jon wrote:
I don’t recall seeing any anti-Jewish/anti-Israel groups.
…………………….
Um…really? It took me about five seconds to find this:
“Anti Zionism”
https://www.facebook.com/arrival12
And this,
“The Truth About Jews”
https://www.facebook.com/truthaboutjews
The above is the usual antisemitic blood libel.
There are many, many more. Why haven’t you been able to find them?
Adrian says
Like seriously, Facebook is a big time fuck up.
I am not a Jew, I am an African.
I saw dangerous incitement against Isreal on Facebook, I reported the post and after a couple of days I got a message from Facebook that THE SAID POST DOES NOT BREAK THE GUIDELINES OF FACEBOOK.
I was shocked.
steve says
Yes this is the way. Hit them where it hurts in the pocket that’s the thing they respond to since money is there God. and none of these dhimmicrat progressives has to live in the midst of the things they create. they are far removed from the mobs in their maids and butlers filled mansions.
UNCLE VLADDI says
It’s about time that leftist Fascbook’s muslim-coddling-and-ignoring “racism” backfired!
For far too long, they’ve turned a blind eye to islamic crime, pretending it would be “racist” of them to notice it – while assiduously tracking down and deleting every last bit of factual anti-crime content that outed islam as the world’s oldest and largest global crime gang. They have covered up and destroyed evidence of muslim crime for long enough! They are complicit, as willing accessories in enabling every crime islam condones and commands of its holy-mobster “muslim” members!
Craig says
Here are some pages of Palestinians that are praising terrorists, spreading lies and inciting terrorism and violence. Facebook owns Instagram and they refuse to remove these hateful comments and accounts:
https://instagram.com/p/9C-6SMwD48/
https://instagram.com/p/4hNohCM4KJ/
https://instagram.com/p/8-WwALzRlN/
https://i.instagram.com/hard_life2015/
https://instagram.com/p/88HAvyyFO0/
https://instagram.com/p/8xN72yrMBb/
https://instagram.com/p/9TWGXMqSDH/