Common sense, long overdue. All Western nations should follow suit.
“Denmark denies citizenship to Islamist,” The Local, October 27, 2015 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):
Belal El-Khatib, 25, thinks that democracy’s time has passed and Denmark should be ruled by Islamic law.
Nevertheless, the Islamist went through the democratic process of formally applying for Danish citizenship. Democracy, however, worked against his favour on Monday as a majority of parliament’s Naturalization Committee (Indfødsretsudvalg) voted to reject his application.
“Belal El-Khatib should not receive citizenship because he is an Islamist. And someone who wants to turn the Danish democracy into a caliphate shouldn’t have citizenship in Denmark,” the committee’s chairman, Christian Langballe of the Danish People’s Party, told news agency Ritzau.
It is unusual that the committee voted on the citizenship of one particular applicant. Integration Minister Inger Støjberg had earlier proposed reevaluating all applications of those who applied for citizenship under a disposition to the normal rules. Although that plan failed to gain the necessary political backing, El-Khatib’s name was discovered among the disposition applicants and the committee decided to handle his application separately given his previous statements in support of establishing Islamic rule in Denmark.
El-Khatib was born and raised in Denmark and told Politiken last month that it “is a bit absurd” that he doesn’t already have Danish citizenship. His mother is a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship and his father was originally a stateless Palestinian before receiving his Danish citizenship some ten years ago. El-Khatib is an Israeli citizen like his mother but applied to become a Dane in 2013.
Naser Khader, an MP for the Conservatives, has called El-Khatib a “pure Islamist” and an “anti-democrat”.
“Citizenship is politics not law. Therefore we can of course allow ourselves to say to these types of people: your opinions are too extreme for us to reward you for them. And we do that to take care of Denmark,” Khader said in a Facebook post praising the El-Khatib decision.
El-Khatib slammed the committee’s ruling and accused Denmark of engaging in “thought control of the worst kind”.
“I haven’t done anything illegal. I contribute to society in many ways, but because one doesn’t have the exact same outlook on life and values as certain politicians, it becomes a hindrance. It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv.

Lu says
“This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv.
Riiight. You are the one who is to talk about democracy!
He is just a telltale exemplar of the Fifth Column’s cancerous subversion of Western civilization. Now he is gonna sue the committee etc. … because he can. He lives in democracy, right?
Europe is going more and more Kafkaesque by the day. Or rather completely insane?
bert goodrich says
But a Liberal would allow him entry, “because he’s truthful. 🙂
BTC
Rob says
Even Franz Kafka couldn’t have made this up.
It’s more Orwellian ‘1984’ territory.
‘The purpose of democracy is to defeat democracy’.
Apart from Canada going down the Trulunacy route again, I do detect some fight back even in Western Europe.
Angela Merkel who played it tough but fair with the Greeks (and the Spanish before them), has rolled on her back over the Muslim immigration horde.
Merkel seems to see the ME migrants as akin to the East Germans who moved to West Germany after the Berlin Wall was breached.
Angela THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!
Don McKellar says
In his mind there is nothing wrong with that statement.
“This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv.
In his mind, he is just one of the moslem colonists who are going to “democratically” bring in sharia law over Europe. They are taking away his vote to take Denmark out of its secular democracy, and that’s not democratic.
Lia Wissing says
Good for Denmark!
Michael Copeland says
“It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy”, said El-Khatib.
He does not want democracy anyway, so this should be fine. As for dictatorship,
“The Islamic state”, says revered scholar Maududi, “is the very antithesis of secular Western democracy … In such a state no one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. Considered from this aspect the Islamic state bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states.”
Complaint dismissed.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Ok, what do we do now that Denmark has thrown down the gauntlet? We have no choice but to deport Nihad Awad and Ibrahim Hooper. And don’t start in with the human rights moaning, they’ll have plenty of fine places to go live out their lives. If nowhere else, Hoop’s namesake will take him in over at Raqqa. But if I were them, I’d opt for England. They make real good welfare payments to devout Moslems in England, direct deposit even.
john spielman says
send them to Saudi Arabia or Iran (depending on if they are sunni or shia). An article today on CBC NEWS that the middle east is heating up so fast from global warming that it may reach close to 150 F. Unless they repent and denounce islam, the doctrine of Satan, they’d better get used to that heat in this life to prepare them for the next.
Joseph says
Drop them off in the middle of the Red Sea. That way they can choose where they want to swim to, Saudi Arabia, Sudan or Egypt. Don’t forget to duct tape them up with a few rpgs and machine guns with lots of ammo. We don’t want to send them there unprepared…..do we?
medaber_emet says
If it was up to me I would take them all
put them in airplanes and give them a parachute
and fly them over sauida arabia and let them jump
so they all will go to mecca
medaber_emet says
and stay there
Joseph says
@ medaber_emet
Does the parachute work?
voegelinian says
You might want to run that by Angemon, our border patrol officer who with his sophistical rhetorical question “Where are you going to deport citizens to?” implies there is no place to deport them to.
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“You might want to run that by Angemon, our border patrol officer”
Nope. Never claimed to be one. But you are not one to let facts get in the way of your little narrative, are you?
“who with his sophistical rhetorical question “Where are you going to deport citizens to?” implies there is no place to deport them to.”
It’s neither rhetorical nor sophistry. It’s something you’d have to answer if you’re really serious with your seditious “total deportation” nonsense – where do you propose to “deport” a Native American to? America? There’s no going around that one. That you willingly and knowingly opt to dodge the question and slander me instead tells a lot about you and your “ideas” – you’re no different in nature from muslims and leftists. Open marketplace of ideas is an alien concept to you, since all you want is being exempt from criticism and bully critics into silence.
Godless says
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/islamic-jihadist-disguised-as-journalist-stabs-idf-soldier/comment-page-1#comment-1310691
Angemon it certainly appears here as if you are objecting to deportation because you don’t know where to deport them to. Is there anybody here who doesn’t conclude the same thing when they read Angemon’s question?
Angemon says
voeg’s mouthpiece posted:
“Angemon it certainly appears here as if you are objecting to deportation because you don’t know where to deport them to.”
This is blatantly false. I’ve stated my stance on deportation many times, and I never, ever – not even once – objected to deportation. What I object is the seditious “total deportation” nonsense voeg’s trying to push, for a series of reasons you should know very well by now. Of course, since you’re voeg’s thrall and therefore are prohibited from thinking critically, all you’ve got is ascribing me falsehoods.
My question still stands: where are you going to deport a native citizen from your country to? No other country is obliged to take them in. But you’re too busy lying about me to actually defend your idea. Sorry, voeg’s idea – you’re just a “yes-man” that doubles as a brownshirt.
Daniel Triplett says
@Godless
The way I’ve been reading Angemon’s position on deportation is pretty simple.
Deporting foreign nationals is one thing. And although the ability to deport 11 M illegals is debatable, I’m one who would gladly see us try.
But deporting Muslim US citizens is another matter altogether. They have rights to remain. To where would we deport them anyway? Who would be obliged to take them? I don’t see how this works at all, and agree with Angemon on this point.
All we can really do is criminalize Islam for them, making the practice or promotion of it a capital offense. Islam is Sedition and Conspiracy to Murder, among many other crimes, so criminalization is totally justifiable in my view.
This, however, leads to the broader discussion of “Isolationism.”
Can we simply erect giant walls, and believe that forevermore we’ll be safe from Muslims?
I don’t think so.
Were we supposed to let the Japanese Emperor and Hitler do whatever they wanted to do too?
We were well isolated from the Soviets. Should Reagan have just left them alone?
What if the Muslims take over the entire Eastern Hemisphere eventually, murdering all of our Allies, all while building or stealing nuke weapon arsenals? Is that how Americans should treat our Allies? And do we really think sticking our heads in the sand like that won’t have fatal consequences for us in the long run?
Isolationism doesn’t work. They will figure out ways to sneak in anyway, either in person, ICBM, or nuke on a container ship.
Have you seen the new Dennis Michael Lynch movie, “They Come to America III?”
He filmed an ice bridge between Canada and NY. On the Canada side was a mosque/madrassa the size of a large university campus. Hundreds of Suburban loads of Muslims were driving across into NY daily, completely out of sight and unopposed by US Border Patrol.
So even if we built a Supermax Fence along the entire 1933 mile Mexican border, they’ll just come through the 3987 mile Canadian border.
And making this all the more easy is the fact that Canada just elected a pro-Muslim PM, so we can expect jihadist infiltration from the North in much greater numbers in the years to follow.
And what are we supposed to do about the Christian and Jewish genocide occurring in the other hemisphere? Just sit back and say, “Not our problem!”
Maybe that’s the answer for many, but I and many others feel like we as Americans have a responsibility to help them.
I don’t agree with making our National mission Nation-building the third-World into democracies.
But when evil Muslims are exterminating Christians & Jews, I believe we have a special responsibility to intervene.
voegelinian says
In addition to that link Godless posted as apparent evidence of Angemon’s strange problem with where we could deport Muslims to, there is then a following comment Angemon zooms in with to pester Godless’s response where he digs his shallow grave even more.
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“In addition to that link Godless posted as apparent evidence of Angemon’s strange problem with where we could deport Muslims to”
A question I’ve asked you many, many times, and to which you’ve gave no answer: where do you propose to deport a native citizen from your country to? Under which laws?
“there is then a following comment Angemon zooms in with to pester Godless’s response”
Oh, you mean I “zoom in” to “pester” someone who replied to me directly and asked me a couple of questions? Is that who I’m “zooming in” to “pester”? This little escapade of you just goes to show what I’ve been saying about your doublespeak: “zoom in” means “reply” and “pester” means “question”.
“where he digs his shallow grave even more.”
Why am I allegedly digging my shallow grave? I don’t know, and if voeg does he certainly keeps it to himself. This is standard spin doctor behaviour: assert something as being true without explaining or providing evidence for it – just wave your hand and pretend that whatever criticism you’re getting is unwarranted. You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time, voeg.
Now, about my question: where to you propose to “deport” a native American citizen to? Under which laws? And how is the receiving country obliged to take them in? This is a scenario your seditious “total deportation” nonsense will have to answer to, so you might as well show your plan for it before running your mouth, don’t you think?
ballotcode says
This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv.
Isn’t that what he was complaining about? Democracy?
There, he got his wish to not be in a democratic state.
mortimer says
He hates democracy, but demands it at the same time.
gravenimage says
He’s just willing to try to use democracy in the short run in order to destroy it, Mortimer.
particolor says
I think Denmark’s Train is Running a Bit Late now to Stop the Barbarians !! 🙁
gravenimage says
Particolor, right now the Muslim population of Denmark is 4.8%. A shocking figure, but Denmark is *not* a Muslim-majority nation yet. Patriotic Danes can still turn this around if they have the will. This story might be a small first step.
Myxlplik says
I’ve got an idea.
According to climate scientists, the Middle East will not be survivable by the end of the century.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/26/extreme-heatwaves-could-push-gulf-climate-beyond-human-endurance-study-shows
I propose “OWEC” or Organization of Water Exporting Countries. In exchange for cheap water at 100 dollars a barrel, Muslim nations who need to import water can get the cheaper 100 dollar a barrel price if they take Muslim immigrants from OWEC nations quid pro quo.
rev g says
Deport!
R Cole says
Like those robots, De-Port, De-Port, De-Port!!
These Muslims seriously think the world will one day want to come under their rule. Who else would be qualified enough to run the Islamic State of Denmark?
It’s – Give me Danish citizenship, so I can take over the country for Islam later!
But right now we need help, food, housing [and not any house and I don’t want to live over there by the forests – thank you], medical and a few other basics – like some money in my pocket!!
::
I think before the so-called Arab Spring, the Left had a leg up – there was this wonderful Islamic world – that the west would do well becoming more like. Even as Muslims were migrating from these ‘Islamic example’ nations to the west, will little traffic the other way. Since the Arab Spring the Islamic world has been laid bare – with everyone focused it is harder to marginalize news reports of religious persecution and atrocities, from out of the region as “racist” and to be ignored. [If you talked to Guardian readers back then, Egypt was the very example of the tolerant society – where Christian minorities lived in perfect harmony with Muslims – somewhere near bliss.]
And now, of course there is the Islamic State, much harder to keep a lid on news coming from here, with the public beheading snuff videos, headless crucifixions and amputations all in the name of Allah and the backing of the Koran – all of which challenges the very foundation of the west’s more palatable Christianized form of Islam.
If that’s Islam – what is this?
If someones says – we want an Islamic state in your country – we now have a much better idea what they mean.
This is not a game!!
::
Denmark is for the most part – leading the European pack on immigration reforms.
Donovan Nuera says
At least Queen Margarethe in April made a very polite, yet firm, admonition to immigrants from a certain part of the world to assimilate…..or go home. Can we hope Queen Elizabeth starts taking a cue from her late father, King George VI, to make a “Queen’s Speech” about how the islamicists and their enablers have destroyed all cherished vestiges of her once great realm??? What does have to lose??? Did she even see that Oscar-winning movie and understand its message???
[fine….if she is too chicken, have Prince Phillip give a speech and not bleep out the cursing!]
Christopher H says
Sadly we won’t be hearing anything of the sort from “King” Obama, as he already promised to stand with the Muslims. *sigh*
Emjay says
I agree wholeheartedly with your comments. ALLEGIANCE to to the Country who accepts you and give sustenance and a FUTURE! Legality first, religion last when you join a new Country
voegelinian says
“These Muslims seriously think the world will one day want to come under their rule.”
Why wouldn’t they, when the entire mainstream West embraces them into every nook & cranny of its societies — and when even the Counter-Jihad is too afraid to discuss the fact that the West cannot, and should not, abide by the presence of any Muslims at all in its societies?
sahani says
No muslim in west or in any democracy should be allowed to be part of citizenship , right to vote or be part of any Govt jobs. They can’t trusted in any way in any govt position. Watch out you all be paying price if living next to a muslim.
mortimer says
A supremacist will not be a good citizen of any country.
Til lykkes, Danmark ! If he has another passport, boot him out.
Myxlplik says
I’d say it would be pretty easy to get this guy another passport. All you need is a felt tip pen, to alter the “ni” in Danish to an “e” and Viola he’s. Citizen of Daesh. Too easy.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Very observant!
voegelinian says
Luckily for mortimer, the vast majority of Muslims are not “supremacists” —
mortimer says
September 18, 2014 at 4:21 pm
Nonsense. Most Muslims are much nicer and more moral than Mohammed. They believe theoretically, but most do not practice all the things required by Islam. Perhaps 85% of Muslims are non-practicing ‘hypocrites’. Only 15% are observant.
Unluckily for the West, mortimer is indulging in a construct impossible to verify (which is no biggie for those who have no qualms playing the deadly-silly game of Muslim Roulette).
Angemon says
My reaction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJFgS1TBpEI
“Belal El-Khatib should not receive citizenship because he is an Islamist. And someone who wants to turn the Danish democracy into a caliphate shouldn’t have citizenship in Denmark” – that’s music for my ear holes. The only way to make it better was if the Danes made it retroactive.
Is it just me or is the Integration Minister doing her job properly? How unusual for a politician…
Politician using common sense? Did I fell in a wormhole into some sort of bizarro world?
No, not an absurd – sheer common sense.
Perhaps they should look into his father’s citizenship as well – I doubt lil’ Khatib’s apple fell far from the tree.
Bravo, Mr. Khader! (and yes, I’m well aware that Naser Khader is not a Norse name)
Huh, no. They’re not trying to control what you think. You’re free to think whatever you want, and they’re free to judge you on what you say.
And you’re not in prison nor on trial.
Are you related to Jesus of Nazareth? Because you’re turning everything into whine. Anyway, your “outlook on life” is at odds with core Western values, so you’re free to pursue your outlook elsewhere.
You should be happy then – weren’t you trying to replace Danish democracy? Seems like your work is half done already!
mortimer says
El-Khatib said the ruling was “thought control of the worst kind”.
HYPOCRITE! He wants to impose his SUPREMACIST thought control over all countries!
El-Khatib is telling we MUST tolerate his intolerance.
Baucent says
I’m sure the irony is lost on him.
gravenimage says
Pious Muslims don’t care about irony. They will use anything that furthers the vile cause of Islam.
dumbledoresarmy says
From the article – “His mother is a Palestinian [sic: a Levantine Arab – dda] with Israeli citizenship and his father was originally a stateless Palestinian [sic: ‘stateless’ Levantine Arab – dda] before receiving his Danish citizenship some ten years ago. El-Khatib is an Israeli citizen like his mother but applied to become a Dane in 2013.”
Okay. Step one, boot him out of Denmark, send him to Israel. They have a more efficient police and military force than the Danes do, and are just a bit further along the learning curve vis a vis the Mohammedan Mob, and will keep a closer eye on him. Then, since he will probably join the Knife Jihad, with any luck the Israelis will blow him away.
voegelinian says
What? Send dangerous Muslims to Israel? They already have enough problems with the unassimilable Muslims they, through the Leftism infecting their society, have disastrously assimilated into their society. Israel should deport its Muslims as well. There are millions of square miles of Hell-on-Earth (the countries making up the O.I.C.) with plenty of room to house all the Muslims in the West, and then some.
PRCS says
Hesp,
“They already have enough problems with the unassimilable Muslims they, through the Leftism infecting their society, have disastrously assimilated into their society.”
Uh, if they’re unassimilable, how then were they assimilated?
And, if those Hell-on-Earth countries won’t take them, what’s the backup plan?
dumbledoresarmy says
*I* am thinking about what is achievable NOW.
Ideally, neither Denmark nor Israel would allow identifiable Muslims to remain within their gates.
But they haven’t fully figured things out, yet, so the evictions *won’t* be beginning for a few years yet (it will happen sooner in Israel, they are much further along the way to figuring out the full meaning and menace of Islam – look up, inter alia, Raphael Israeli, Mordechai Kedar, Tuvia Brodie and Victor Sharpe, who are all writing very sensibly – in the Israeli mainstream media – on the subject of islam, and Jihad).
In the meantime: here is a nasty mohammedthug. Where – GIVEN EXISTING LAWS IN BOTH ISRAEL AND DENMARK – will he be least able to cause harm? Under *existing* laws, it seems to me that he can be passed – like a rather unpleasant hot potato – from Denmark to Israel. Just like HookHand Hamza was shifted from the UK, to a maximum security prison, in the USA, which did not return him to the dar al Isalm, but DID put him significantly out of circulation, and reduced his capacity to do immediate harm.
Israeli citizens are better armed in general, and *much* more on the alert, than the average Dane. They’ve had a lot more practice. They have wised up to the stabbing jihad pretty quickly; the Muslims have lost the element of surprise, and now more and more of the stabbers are getting blown away or stomped on before they can complete their attacks.
Israel has, of late, summarily disposed of quite a lot of murderous mohammedthugs, so you might say the total number of mohammedthugs in Israel won’t be altered by the arrival of this particular thug. Furthermore, given that, under *present* laws and rules about citizenship status, right NOW, (and my concern is NOW) this creature *could* presumably be sent back to Israel, that takes him a lot closer to the dar al Islam where he ultimately belongs, than Denmark, and will one more – known to be dangerous – mohammedthug make that much difference to Israel’s existing mohammedan problem? He’ll just fill the gap vacated by one of the deceased stabbers. The Danish secret service can put him in a parcel, all tied up nicely with a ribbon, and hand him over, with all his identifying particulars, to the Mossad, who probably – for all we know – know ALL about him, and his entire clan, already.
And if the Israelis decide, in a few months or a couple of years, that they want to be rid of him, well, Gaza is right next door and so is Syria, they won’t even have to go to the expense of a plane fare, just pick him up by the seat of the pants and scruff of the neck and chuck him over the fence. Or merely look the other way as he *himself* scuttles off to Syria to join the jihad…and *then* annul his citizenship, which is *exactly* what lawmakers in Israel are working their way toward.
PS You are of course quite free to write to the Danish embassy in the US, or to the Danish government, advising them that they should evict all Mohammedans from Denmark to the dar al Islam, beginning with this bloke.
Have you?? Have you actually written to *any* politicians in either the USA or anywhere else in the western world, proposing the deportation of mohammedans? Or even just asking for all *further* mohammedan *immigration* to be stopped (which is, I think the thing more likely to happen, as a first practical step, than deportations of those already present and entrenched).
I don’t think I’ve ever read a posting by you in which you’ve ever mentioned anything that you actually *do*, no matter how small – e.g. sending an email to a politician or diplomatic rep. – by way of furthering the Resistance.
Sam says
““I haven’t done anything illegal. I contribute to society in many ways, but because one doesn’t have the exact same outlook on life and values as certain politicians, it becomes a hindrance. It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv.” ”
It is surprising that Dhimmi Denmark did something right. However, this Muslim is definitely discriminated compared to all the scum Muslims living in Denmark
Jan II Sobieski says
How many more Islamist immigrants are there who want to make Denmark Islamic but aren’t saying so because they want the benefits of living in the good democratic society the Danes have built until they eventually vote or shoot there way to an Islamic Denmark government?
voegelinian says
How many more “Islamists” are there in Denmark? Since we must rationally conclude, based upon mountain ranges of data already available to us, that “Islamist” = Muslim, then there’s your answer.
Cameron says
No one from an Islamic majority country should be given permanent residency or citizenship in the civilized western civilizations unless they can show that they can contribute more than with simply cheap labour or ethnic cuisine. Within the next decade or so we will have automated robots to do most of that labour anyway. We don’t need fundamentalists or Islamists for anything. We already have restaurants that sell ethnic cuisines from all over the world. There’s no point in bringing in thousands or even millions of Muslims who don’t fit into Western customs of working for a salary. Too many of them just breed and live off benefits and steal and join organized street gangs and have no intention of contributing to western societies in any way except to destroy it and impose Islamic laws and a caliphate. They are worthless and potentially dangerous and in the next few decades they will likely become even more so.
Where are the Belgians going to flee to when Belgium becomes over 50% Islamic and Sharia gets introduced over all of Belgium?(expected in the next few decades I read) – Same eventually with France, same with parts of the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, Spain, Germany, etc…If Islamists gain that much power over non-muslims or even the wrong sort of muslims, then where are the refugees from those certain civil wars going to flee to?
voegelinian says
“No one from an Islamic majority country should be given permanent residency or citizenship in the civilized western civilizations unless they can show that they can contribute more than with simply cheap labour or ethnic cuisine. ”
ROTPRLMAO (Rolling On The Prayer Rug Laughing My Ass Off).. Perhaps Aafia Siddiqi would satisfy Cameron’s daniel-pipesian criteria. She was the Pakistani Muslim who studied for years in America — including M.I.T. and Brandeis in Boston (where she received a Ph.D. in engineering). Her smiling picture, looking all unhijabbedly (an adverb soon to be included in the upcoming edition of the O.E.D.) friendly and assimilated would fool the likes of Cameron and the other Counter-Jihad Softies. Only problem is that later, after the fact, — she was found out to be intimately involved in supporting al Qaeda. When she was apprehended, her American captors were foolish enough to think she was harmless, but she picked up a rifle and began shooting at them (luckily killing no one). She currently resides in prison in Texas to where she was sentenced in 2010. All those years in America while she was being trusted by Westerners even more clueless than the Counter-Jihad Softies, she could have enabled a horrific terror attack on us, perhaps even worse than 911.
To see the smiling face of Aafia Siddiqi see my photo gallery and scroll down among the multitude of other smiling, friendly, productive Muslims I’ve listed there, most of whose bonafides would pass the test of the PC MCs (and of most of the Counter-Jihad Softies, if they actually had taken the trouble to articulate a test):
Smiling Faces
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2014/06/smiling-faces.html
voegelinian says
P.S.: By the way, I’ve noticed a seeming increase in the repellent asymptotic term “Islamist” on the pages of Jihad Watch comments — along with the absence of anyone calling out that outrageous camelshit of a term.
Jay Boo says
Here is an idea to use.
Why don’t you call it out yourself and state your case instead of asking others to do it for you?
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“P.S.: By the way, I’ve noticed a seeming increase in the repellent asymptotic term “Islamist” on the pages of Jihad Watch comments — along with the absence of anyone calling out that outrageous camelshit of a term.”
Try leading by example for a change – start calling it an “outrageous camelshit of a term” every time you come across it instead of whining about others not doing it.
Or are you censoring yourself to please the PC MCs?
abad says
Good for Denmark.
They should deport him back to his Islamic State paradise known as ISL Syria.
judy ellickson says
” This is not democracy,”
hmmmmmm…
“a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity … are involved in making decisions about its affairs,..”
Well whaddya know….
it IS a democracy, and you have just been voted off the island…..
Matthieu Baudin says
The National Socialists announced well in advance their antipathy towards democracy and finally had to be forced from power at great cost. These sharia monsters should be shipped out before they further erode civil society and make life a nightmare for the rest of us who wish to share authority and power throughout our communities.
More Ham Ed says
Every islamic (lowercase be upon them) region on the Earth is a disaster area, at war with their neighbors, and every democratic society is where muslims (lowercase be upon them) run to. Leftists and islamists both have in common a wild imagination of a “paradise on earth” of some kind.
ich says
@HAM…………….LOVE THE (lower case be upon them ) hahah
gravenimage says
Denmark denies citizenship to Muslim who wants to replace democracy with Islamic law
………………………………………
Godt for dig Danmark!
Finally, some sanity!
More:
El-Khatib slammed the committee’s ruling and accused Denmark of engaging in “thought control of the worst kind”.
“I haven’t done anything illegal. I contribute to society in many ways, but because one doesn’t have the exact same outlook on life and values as certain politicians, it becomes a hindrance. It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy.
………………………………………
Supremacist Mohammedans have no shame at all…
PRCS says
“El-Khatib was born and raised in Denmark”
I’m confused. Why, then, is he (as an individual) an Israeli citizen?
dumbledoresarmy says
Presumably, because his mother possessed it (i.e. she must have been born to Arab Muslim parents who descend from people who *didnt* leave when many other Arabs – mostly Muslims, some Christians – heeded the call to get out of the war zone in 1948 so that the incoming jihad armies could wipe out the Jews for them). And presumably Israeli citizenship, if you have it, whether you are Arab or Jewish, is something that you can hang onto if you migrate somewhere else, as this man’s mother obviously did.
PRCS says
Here in the U.S.—-with a few exceptions, born here=automatic citizenship
What’s the law down under?
Jayell says
I still can’t get my head round this character’s complaint that the Danes were guilty of ‘thought control’. And this from a Muslim? I was going to say that this is rank hypocrisy, but you need to string thoughts together for that, and wouldn’t that be verboten in Islam? It’s still gross insolence to go to someone else’s country and presume to dictate how they will run the place, but you expect this sort of ignorant stupidity from Muslims.
SuchindranathAiyerS says
India, thanks to the the likes of Khilafat Gandhi have pretended that Moslems are not an alien enemy. Even though devout Moslems, since 1947, rustle and slaughter temple and Hindu cows, kidnap and rape non-Moslem women, riot, carry out ethnic cleansing, pollute the atmosphere at least five times a day and refuse to sing India’s National Song with the blessings of India’s Jusges, Police and Administration. Denmark may just be waking up for the stupor that a brutal fascist empire is a religion.
Donovan Nuera says
Hey, El-Khatib! Nice hat…now go finish that order of 3 Big Macs, 2 large cheesy fries, and 3 small vanilla shakes! The drive-through is backing up again!
gravenimage says
I don’t think it’s a good idea to have supremacist Mohammedans handling Infidel food…
“Islamic jihadists plotting to poison multiple U.S. buffets and salad bars”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/islamic-jihadists-plotting-to-poison-multiple-us-buffets-and-salad-bars
There are many more stories like this one, including Muslims adulterating food with urine and fecal matter.
Mick Bolton says
”El-Khatib slammed the committee’s ruling and accused Denmark of engaging in “thought control of the worst kind”.
I’d have said that Islam/Shari’a law is the worst form of thought control
Chris Cross says
Send him back to the countries that practise the religion of peace. There can’t be any danger to his welfare as Islam is a religion of peace. It’s all propaganda that Islamic countries are not peaceful. Ask any Muslim and they will tell you it is a religion of peace.
Bring all of the Christians, Jews and other religions to countries that do not practise the religion of peace.
Let Islam have its peace in its countries and all the rest of us live in our peace-less societies. We don’t want saving thanks Islam. You are too good for us. Spare us your trouble please.
Joseph says
My Lord and Savior is a Jew so I take their stance of Jew hatred personally.
If you personally know any Jews please take the time to tell them that you stand with them against any type of hatred, especially hatred like this.
Cecilia Ellis says
Joseph, I proudly concur with your entire comment!
rabrooks says
There it is. The key word is “Islamist”! We need to express this term loudly and as much as the non-word “islamophobia” has been thrown around!
Westman says
El-Khatib says, “This is thought control of the worst kind”. (Muezzin call to prayer heard in the distance)… “Sorry, gotta do this” (throws down prayer rug in doorway and starts praying). Committee member says, “you’re blocking the door!” El-Khatib says, “this is not Democracy”
parousia says
“This is not democracy.”
Exactly. You don’t want democracy either. So they’re giving you “non-democracy,” which is what you want. So why complain?
Islam :-finally someone gets the drift says
Here’s the thing,
these actors are intend to invade Europe,
breed and get to be 51% of the population,
vote each other into parliament,
once they have control of democracy,
vote democracy out and vote Sharia in,,,,,,,,,,
You gotta love freedom ….
I think Muslims should be Denmark’s major export,
Muslims get so much as a parking ticket, they get a free ride to the middle east, cattle class,
Hallelujah Denmark,,,, you have taken the first step, lets all hope the rest of Europe gets the hint …….
ICH says
Not to get religious , but Jesus criticizes the rockstar Jewish Pharissees
for parading around and acting pious and religious when knowing
they are sinners like everyone else.
He said you are praying to be seen.
These Islamists love holding their book of hate and wearing
religious garb. I am sure next they will fight over who wears
the best hat.
Rick Spencer says
Aptly-named Christian Langballe (“long balls”) is a politician with BALLS. At last, someone sensible!
astunkojis says
thats what he said: “time to democracy has passed” 😀 ha ha 😀 democracy has a right to defend it self 😀 to be an islamist is not an opinion.. 😀
mortimer says
You are naïve. In a free society we all have a right to believe in any nonsense or opinion. Western politicians have no idea what is in Sharia. Most Western politicians and journalists seem to have the truly UNINFORMED opinion that Islam is a form of Marxist liberation theory. Sharia makes it illegal to resist jihad in any manner, including using free speech to do so! Verbally resisting the imposition of Sharia requires a death sentence.
Belal El-Khatib contradicts himself: he demands the use of freedom of speech to DESTROY freedom of speech.
mortimer says
Why would Belal El-Khatib ask to join Denmark as a citizen? He DESPISES the Danish values enshrined in the CONSTITUTION OF DENMARK.
Why join a country that you hate and wish to destroy?
Daniel Triplett says
The hijrah.
He’s just doing his duty for Allah.
Matt says
Social jihad. Infiltrate a country and society by peaceful means so you can destroy it from the inside. If that doesn’t work, then they become violent and murderous.
Matt says
Interesting, it seems that if you mention certain concepts lile j*had, your comments are censored. Mine never showed up, so let’s try it this way:
He is simply performing social j*had, which is where you infiltrate a country or society through peaceful and legal means so you can destroy it from the inside out. That is what is happening. Once the society and culture has been weakened enough then you go to all out war and domination.
gravenimage says
Matt, sometimes it can take a few minutes for comments to post–and your comment, including the word “jihad”, *did* post. You are certainly not being censored for mentioning Jihad at Jihad Watch.
Jan says
Thats the million dollar question all over the western world.
voegelinian says
astunkojis says
thats what he said: “time to democracy has passed” ? ha ha ? democracy has a right to defend it self
Leave it to the egregious counter-jihad softy, mortimer, to seize on the wrong point which astunkojis’s comment arouses. The problem with astunkojis’s comment is not the threat to democracy which so concerns mortimer in his obtuse anxiety; the problem is that astunkojis’s comment presumes that a democracy defending itself necessarily has to forsake its democracy. Every day, democracies do things to defend their citizens from crime and sedition that to the obtuse observer would look like they were violating their democratic principles. Stripping of citizenship (or, rather, realizing Muslims never were citizens in the first place because their Islam makes that an impossibility other than as deception, taqiyya fraud) and total deportation would be such things — once we wake up to the actual nature & dimensions of the threat of Muslims following their Islam (and seeing how obtuse the Counter-Jihad remains — a tiny demographic one would assume would be pushing the envelope on this — the West at large is going to wake up only after it’s almost too late; i.e., only after a few million of us get mass-murdered by Muslims, millions more get horribly wounded and sick (think chemical and/or biological attacks), horrific destruction of parts of our infrastructure ensue, and incalculable psychological trauma).
Mike says
The best possible scenario to get out of this mess is:
– a Republic can president in 2017
– some outrageous can’t-be-ignored Islamofascist behaviour
– as massive American reaction, to the point of invading a few countries in the Middle East and running them as colonies for generations, until Islamofascism has gone out of style
Otherwise, it’s the slow road to ruin on the defensive. Only by a major blow will the will of Islamofascism be broken. A major blow could include American troops controlling access to Mecca, by way of example. That would calm things down for a while.
mortimer says
KSA is an ally of the USA. The only way to end the jihad threat is to continue to deprogram Muslims with websites like Jihad Watch and many others that intelligently expose the absurd and immoral doctrines of Islam.
gravenimage says
Mortimer wrote:
The only way to end the jihad threat is to continue to deprogram Muslims with websites like Jihad Watch and many others that intelligently expose the absurd and immoral doctrines of Islam.
………………………….
Mortimer–with all respect–I don’t believe the purpose of Jihad Watch is to “deprogram Muslims”.
Have you, in fact, ever heard a Muslim here commenting that he supported Jihad and now does not due to what he has read here at Jihad Watch? I’ve been here for nine years now, and I have *never* seen such a post.
Most posts you see from Muslims here are either Taqiyya insisting that Islam is a “religion of peace” and we are all a bunch of ignorant “Islamophobes” if we don’t uncritically swallow that obvious tripe, or else Muslim supremacists overtly gloating over our supposed immanent enslavement and murder by pious JIhadists.
But this should not surprise–few Muslims would listen to what the despised “filthy Infidel” might have to say–especially if we say we don’t want Muslims to oppress, enslave and kill us.
So–if Jihad Watch isn’t for “deprogramming” Muslims, what is it for?
From “Why Jihad Watch”:
“Why Jihad Watch? Because non-Muslims in the West, as well as in India, China, Russia, and the world over, are facing a concerted effort by Islamic jihadists, the motives and goals of whom are largely ignored by the Western media, to destroy their societies and impose Islamic law upon them — and to commit violence to that end even while their overall goal remains out of reach. That effort goes under the general rubric of jihad…”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/why-jihad-watch
In other words, JIhad Watch is here for warning and educating *Infidels* about the Jihad threat.
Daniel Triplett says
@gravenimage
I agree with your remarks, spoken with articulation & persuasive eloquence as always.
The Muslims can’t simply be “reasoned” into Apostasy.
They already know about Western life, our human rights, and civil liberties. They have Internet, TV, and Western movies, for starters.
If their Apostasy is simply a matter of exposing them to our righteousness, then all the hijrah Muslims already living in the West would just look around at us and say, “Good Lord, what was I thinking? I’ve been wrong all along. The West is correct, and Islam is evil. I’ll Apostatize from Islam immediately.”
But they don’t, because they don’t want to be like us.
Most of us have seen the stats right here on JW, which clearly show the majority of Western Muslims support Islam & sharia. The Muslims saying otherwise are just lying, with Muruna.
We must earn the Muslims’ respect. The only way they’ll respect us is through violence.
The Muslims must witness Western shock & awe violence delivered on a Biblical scale, leaving no doubt in their minds that the Allies are intellectually and technologically superior, and Allah will never save them.
And the Muslims within our borders must see that we’re dead serious about making the practice or promotion of Islam a capital crime, and will execute offenders in short order.
Only then will they be receptive to alternative ideas like Western ideologies and Christianity.
voegelinian says
What about the millions of Muslims inside the West, including America? Will a Republican President who invades a couple of Muslim countries consider them to be magically delicious and moderate and unrelated to the enemies we are fighting overseas?
quotha raven says
To Voegellinian, who asks “Will a Republican President who invades a couple of Muslim countries consider them to be magically delicious…?”
Er…as in “meet, greet and EAT?” My goodness! Now, THERE’S a novel idea…
Cheers!
quotha r
quotha raven says
Oops! I meant “meet, greet, defeat and eat” ))))) Cheers! qr
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“Leave it to the egregious counter-jihad softy, mortimer, to seize on the wrong point which astunkojis’s comment arouses.”
And leave it to the tin pot dictator, voeg, to spend most of his time here insulting and denigrating counter-jihadis.
“Every day, democracies do things to defend their citizens from crime and sedition that to the obtuse observer would look like they were violating their democratic principles.”
That’s because they’re republics – they’re ruled by laws. When was the last time you had any saying on whether a citizen gets stripped of their citizenship and/or deported? I’m guessing your local/state/federal government never asked you what to do regarding anything – they simply look at the law books and decide accordingly.
“Stripping of citizenship (or, rather, realizing Muslims never were citizens in the first place because their Islam makes that an impossibility other than as deception, taqiyya fraud) and total deportation would be such things ”
Under which laws do you propose to do that? To deny people of their rights based on their religion, or political stance, or skin colour? Oh, wait – you don’t have a clue. You work under the assumption that if you get X/2 + 1 people to say one thing (where X is the total population), that thing happens as if by magic.
People get stripped of their citizenship because there’s a law in place stating the requirements and conditions where citizenship can be stripped. People get deported because there’s a law in place stating the requirements and conditions in which a person can be deported. Republics are ruled by laws, not by the logical fallacy of appeal to numbers. If you want to live under a totalitarian system move to North Korea.
“once we wake up to the actual nature & dimensions of the threat of Muslims following their Islam (and seeing how obtuse the Counter-Jihad remains — a tiny demographic one would assume would be pushing the envelope on this — the West at large is going to wake up only after it’s almost too late; i.e., only after a few million of us get mass-murdered by Muslims, millions more get horribly wounded and sick (think chemical and/or biological attacks), horrific destruction of parts of our infrastructure ensue, and incalculable psychological trauma).”
And what is your solution to prevent the deaths of millions? Oh, wait, not only you got nothing but you also deride and mock the people who are actively trying to do that.
gravenimage says
Voegelinian, you can make your points without insulting others here.
voegelinian says
1) I’m not insulting others here; I’m sick of their Softism and I’m challenging them to defend it with an argument (not sophistry as Angemon does).
2) Whether I insult others here or not, that’s irrelevant to the points I’m making — but gravenimage puts the less important above the more important. Odd behavior, given the dire importance of this issue.
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“1) I’m not insulting others here; ”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/france-radical-prisoner-on-the-run-after-getting-temporary-leave-from-prison-shoots-policeman-in-the-head#comment-1308385
“I’m sick of their Softism ”
Why are they allegedly soft? Because the don’t trip over one another for the privilege of being a total sycophant to you.
“nd I’m challenging them to defend it with an argument ”
No, you’re not. You’re doing your usual shtick: you insult and berate others, create a distorted version of their argument – a strawman, and that’s the best case, since you’re not above simply manufacturing lies – and ascribe it to them rather than addressing their actual argument.
“ (not sophistry as Angemon does).”
You’ve never, ever proved that anything I say is sophistry. You, like any two-bit spin-doctor, just repeat it over and over, hoping people eventually fall for it. Crying “sophistry”, like crying “racism”, is simply a handy way to wave away criticism you don’t like – i.e., any and every criticism.
“2) Whether I insult others here or not”
Which you do. And worse, you expect – nay, demand – others to insult those who “wronged” you by talking back at you.
“that’s irrelevant to the points I’m making”
They’re essentially ALL the points you make. Calling people “softies”, “asymptotics”, “fucktards”, etc., is your bread and butter, it’s the very essence of what you do here. If anyone disagrees with what you say you simply insult them. People disagree with your seditious “total deportation” nonsense? Then they’re “softies”, and they’re defending muslims. You never defended your argument with facts or logic, you simply fling crap at others, like a monkey with its feces, in a textbook example of crab mentality.
“— but gravenimage puts the less important above the more important. Odd behavior, given the dire importance of this issue.”
That’s for you to prove since GI – at least as far as I can tell – never ranked you being a s***ty person for everyone else here who’s volunteering to be your personal flying monkey more or less important than the banal clichés you crap out every once in a while to try to look relevant. Again, acting with the MO I described above: manufacturing lies and ascribing them to others.
Here’s what you said about mortimer:
Is “egregious counter-jihad softy” meant to be a compliment or an insult? I say it’s meant to be an insult. Prove otherwise, voeg. Betcha you can’t.
Abbey Lane says
What a silly, stupid little crap heap. Git the gormless nobody out of the country ban it from re entering.
Marty says
He should come to the UK where his views are mainstream.
The UK taxpayer even funds schools where this is taught.
Also taught quite openly in such schools is the belief that
mohammedans should not interact with non muslims, guaranteeing
future civil unrest.
voegelinian says
I see in Marty we have a visitor from Bizarro World, where everything is upside-down and reverse.
quotha raven says
To Voeg, regarding the “….visitor from Bizarro World…”
Exactly. I always think of the worlds of Lewis Carrol, esp Through the Looking Glass. I’m continually reminded by where I live: “where everything is upside-down and reverse.” These are very dicey times we live in. Cheers! Quotha R
BC says
. It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy,”
Neither is Islam!
eduardo odraude says
The guy complains that it is undemocratic to keep him from trying to end democracy. A &%^@# like that shouldn’t only lose the possibility of citizenship in Denmark. He should be exported ASAP to his fantasy island somewhere in sharia land.
steve says
Here’s a thought I am not going to control. Since when does the religion of p&88 ever have an original thought?
eduardo odraude says
Not sure this counts, but as a totalitarian system it seems scary brilliant sometimes.
mortimer says
Denmark is acting in its own self-interest to exclude someone who hates Danish values, wishes to destroy them and has no desire to protect the Danish constitution.
Such an opponent of Denmark is not just opposed to certain values of Denmark, but to its essential character as a free, social-democratic country. He is opposed to freedom of expression, to gender equality and to religious equality.
He is a religious fascist who wishes to overthrow Danish human rights and civil liberties and put Denmark into the culture of 7th century Arabia.
Keith Wilkinson says
“I haven’t done anything illegal. I contribute to society in many ways, but because one doesn’t have the exact same outlook on life and values as certain politicians, it becomes a hindrance. It reminds me of a dictatorship. This is not democracy,” he told Radio24syv. lol whatever, guy. Getout then.
Caro says
But in reality, ‘democracies’ are ‘dictatorships’ especially with the advent of political correctness etc. which has put a noose around our necks, preventing us to even state facts, let alone our own opinions.
Caro says
Whoever let him into the country, should be keelhauled!
Bouquets to the Naturalisation Committee.
dumbledoresarmy says
Re ‘bouquets to the Naturalisation Committee’.
ALL Danish jihadwatchers lurking here around this time (October 2015) should be *sending* bouquets.
That is, they should be writing post-haste to the said Naturalisation Committee to express heartiest approval for the decision NOT to give El-Khatib Danish citizenship. Actions that are rewarded are likely to be repeated; if the Committee receives an avalanche of letters saying “well done! don’t give Danish citizenship to people like this who call for the Sharia to be imposed”, then they may be emboldened to reject the citizenship applications of *other* mohammedthug sharia-pushers.
For good measure, copy the letter to the Immigration Minister, and to your own elected representative.
Besides praising the decision of the Naturalisation Committee to deny citizenship, state that El-Khatib’s continuing presence in the country under *any* circumstances makes you feel threatened.
And demand that he be deported, ASAP.
Bill says
Exactly, and now Merkel should be condemned by the world’s leaders. Tony Abbott told the UK conservatives how he stopped the muslims in their boats, everyone knew what Merkel was up to, and now Germany should pay for all the costs of repatriating all these muslims back to wherever they came from, as soon as this Christmas.
The longer they stay, the more difficult it will be to dislodge them.
jan says
Sending these refugees back to where they came from makes sense in light of the Russian efforts to obliterate ISIS targets so successfully has eliminated their reason for leaving in the first place. Especially as so many of these ‘refugess’ seem to me male, and I am sure they would love to go back and see their families and wives.