In this special edition of The Glazov Gang, I was joined by Dr. Mudar Zahran, a leader of Jordan’s opposition. He came on the show to discuss how he is a Muslim refugee in Europe who sees great danger in Muslim refugees flooding Europe.
He gives a dire warning about The Nation of Islam Coming to Europe.
Don’t miss it!
The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program. Please donate through our Pay Pal account, subscribe to our YouTube Channel and LIKE us on Facebook.
Laurence says
No to Sharia Law, definitely. Learn the language and culture and customs and laws of the host nation, and do your very best to integrate into the host nation and become a welcome part of the native community, contributing to the welcoming host nation’s common good. And uphold the host nation’s constitution. Always maintain separation of State and “Religion” (Temple, Synagogue, Church, Mosque, etc.). Absolutely no to theocratic governments. Yes to democracy.
jayell says
Haven’t had time to watch this, but doesn’t the title say it all? – “Muslim Refugee in Europe Warns About Muslim Refugees in Europe” – straight from the horse’s mouth, as they say. How will the weasely PC apologists get out of THIS one?
laura m. says
Glad to hear this warning. Many Muslim refugees are embedded with jihadists in the E.U. and America. I’m shocked at the European’s self hatred of their countries (also themselves and family) allowing this unabated mass immigration. Soon massive unrest and purges by Muslims killing the so called European infidels. Police and rulers will stand by allowing this. Europeans are incapable of thinking critically, common sense logic, and do not know anything about their history! Stupid bunch. Laura Alabama usa
Angemon says
A “quran-only” muslim, eh? The quran itself mandates subjugation of non-muslims because of their religion. And mainstream muslims consider him to be an heretic. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place…
Godless says
Angemon is assuming that when a Muslim claims to be a Quranist they really are.
Angemon says
Godless posted:
“Angemon is assuming that when a Muslim claims to be a Quranist they really are.”
Prove it.
Ron says
The Qur’an has internal inconsistencies so how can anyone truly abide by it?
TheBuffster says
I’ll say this for Dr. Mudar Zahran – he’s trying very hard to convince people not to let Muslim refugees into the country – not to swell the ranks of Muslims in Europe and America because they’ll destroy the freedom wherever they settle. If he wanted the West to be jihaded and Shariahed, why would he be warning so adamantly against it?
somehistory says
He says he is muslim, but he talks like he has actually become apostate. He also equates the teaching of supremacy of islam with the same thing other *religions*., according to him,…have. He speaks what is true about such things as what is happening to the Jews…and other things he mentioned…but if he has not become apostate, then he is adept at being confused and confusing.
And something else I have thought about: 75% of the *refugees* have left safe areas in Syria (the ones actually from Syria) because those that need to leave due to living in unsafe areas are not free to leave. This has to be one of the big reasons they don’t have the real needs that true refugees have….food, water, clothing, etc.
Clearly, none of the major *news* organizations have given a true and accurate picture of what is really happening.
Jay Boo says
Not just Germany’s problem.
The Hamburg, Germany terrorist cell & 911
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgLwu2FhfDM
Muhammad’s Islam is not religion.
Filth
Antuz says
This guy really is angry at muslims, allthough not an apostate a small gentle push would certainly free him from this evil.
underbed cat says
Mudar is a” orthodox” muslim and does not believe in sharia? My analysis of that statement is that Assad is more likely to keep to be moderate against sharia and he is the only leader willing to tolerate Christians and Jews. While Russia will go after the Islamic state(or isis)who follow sharia law brutality. . Either he is fibbing or he is bold to speak about not wanting sharia law. I think it is the former.
Lilithwept says
This totally amazed me! That a practicing muslim, a refugee in Europe himself would take the position that a muslim takeover of Europe is a bad idea and to make the comment that Jews had done alot for Europe and banishing them all from Europe was bad! My goodness, did the world just end?
His claim that the Koran only has a few verses of violence, the Koran has only a small amount of violence is not true. I have read the Koran countless times and it has a lot of violence.
And he is right, if the muslims take over a country that country will stop being as productive as it was, even if the Non muslims stay under a dhimmie contract. So that is one reason why a muslim Europe is a bad idea.
Another reason is when ( I refuse tomsay “if”) the US gets its courage back, Europe would be a bloodbath when the US helps to take it back for the Europeans. Muslims would did by the millions.
What other reasons can my fellow readers come up with?
Angemon says
Lilithwept posted:
“This totally amazed me! That a practicing muslim, a refugee in Europe himself would take the position that a muslim takeover of Europe is a bad idea and to make the comment that Jews had done alot for Europe and banishing them all from Europe was bad! My goodness, did the world just end?”
Nah – it’s all in the context of “muslims who are pouring into Europe are following an erroneous interpretation of islam while I follow the correct one”.
“His claim that the Koran only has a few verses of violence, the Koran has only a small amount of violence is not true. I have read the Koran countless times and it has a lot of violence.”
Indeed, and while one can argue that many depictions of violence contained in it are mere descriptions of what awaits unbelievers or sinners in the afterlife (the hellfire, the boiling fluid that melts their skins, etc.), one can’t overlook the fact that the quran mandates subjugation of non-muslims because of their religion. It’s not a matter of violence per se, those open-ended commandments valid for all times to wage war on Jews, Christians and non-muslims in general are the problem.
Kilfincelt says
According to those who have done the work, 97 to 98% of the Hadiths, biography of Muhammad, and the Qur’an show that Jihad is seen in militaristic terms. This means that references to violence run throughout these works. Furthermore, violence in Islam is prescribed; however, in the Bible it is descriptive in nature; thus, his statement about violence being a part of other religions is not totally accurate. Only Islam currently demands violence of its adherents.