In this special new edition of The Glazov Gang, I was joined by Robert Spencer, the Director of JihadWatch.org and the author of the new book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS.
Robert came on the show to discuss his new book, unveiling the inner workings of the Islamic State, Obama’s catastrophic failure in dealing with it, how kafirs can stop its reign of terror, and much, much more.
Don’t miss it!
The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program. Please donate through our Pay Pal account or our Indiegogo campaign. Also subscribe to our YouTube Channel and LIKE us on Facebook.
nacazo says
Robert, please leave your book longer so people can read the title. Btw, i already bought it.
nacazo says
i mean keep it up longer in front of the camera.
Angemon says
People can pause the video 🙂
nacazo says
I’m just telling so that Robert pauses long enough when he goes on TV.
Shane says
I would love to see Robert talk about Islam, jihad, Muhammad, and ISIS on more of the Fox News shows like The Factor. America needs to learn the truth about Islam and terrorism.
underbed cat says
Yikes…..Just got a krause Funeral Home ad that popped up under the comments. This is a first. Any other comment writer see this.? Also get a flurry of phone calls after visiting my daily websites for information.
Anyway, one comment besides good show Jaimie and Robert as usual, Robert your book appears larger than I thought it first appeared. Sometimes this all gets a little confusing in terminology, but all these terror groups have a basis in islam and are strugglel with each other for position to claim a caliphate.
I get that Putin wants to stop is and keep Assad, but why is he aligning with Iran…Iran has no religious tolerance..unless it is just a temporary strategy, our world certainly is a mess with islamic insanity.
Jack Diamond says
All well enough to tell us what to do about ISIS but he never told us his favorite Beatle album.
nacazo says
Japan’s shinto directive should be applied to islam after any American intervention. True separation frm religion and state.
nacazo says
At 6:08, RS says: Putin gave him one [plan]. He [Obama?] didn’t like it because it involved toppling Assad.
Was it a mispoken sentence which should have been “He didn’t like it because it involved NOT toppling Assad”? Or does RS mean, Putin didn’t like it?
johnKD says
I have a question:
why is it possible that indonesias islam is syncretistic – eg mixed with other influence like buddism, when the Qur’ans wording cannot be changed at all.
what is the stance of other muslims about the indonsian version of islam? Are they a kind apostates?
nacazo says
Do you mean like the Bali bombers’ islam? I think isis is fine with that version of islam,
Paijo says
Let me tell you..
In the beginning islam in Indonesia is mixed with Hindu since that’s the religion at that time (and the fastest way to spread islam is to assimilate it with the culture).. The early type of islam in Indonesia is much more like Hinduism.. They only change the prayer.. From pray to Hindu’s gods and ancestors to mahomed and alloh.. Nowadays there are still exist sect like kejawen that represent that.. It is more tolerant cz the values from Hinduism are more dominant.. But moslems in Indonesia slowly but sure lost their identity.. They prefer arabian type of Islam since lots of madrasah or pesantren that funded by middle eastern teach that kind of islam.. Lots of habib from middle east come to Indonesia to teach arabian way of life/value (they are praised by Indonesian.. Have higher status.. lots followes.. And money).. And there’s a stereotype here that Indonesian Islam like Kejawen is syirik and not islamic anymore..if they practice kejawen in public there will be a lot of protests from moslems..
People like bali bomber is the product of arabian teaching.. He won’t like kejawen people.. He will call them infidels.. Maybe the modern type of islam that still hold the value of Indonesian culture is Nahdlatul Ulama (NU).. One of the biggest sect in Indonesia..
johnKD says
Thanks for the clarification. Very interesting.
While I know now that the syncretistic version of islam in this country is more and more “arabized”
I still dont get why the indonesian muslims were allowed to develope a deviation from the Qur’an hundreds of years ago at all. Is the Qur’ans claim of truth a arabic product of modern times and has not been existant in eg 19th century? I always thought the Qur’an and Sharia laws is an absolute claim of truth planet wide for all true muslims. But if the indonesian Abangans (those who consider themselves muslims but dont follow all laws of the Sharia) were allowed their own traditional hindu ways, they should always have been considered (and should be still considered today) as apostates by real muslims, no?
nacazo says
i think paijo has the answer to your question in his entry. The initial muslims were trying to spread islam by assimilating to the culture so they produced a synchretic islam where is basically hinduism, you just have to pray to one god and follow mohammed. Similarly, in America you hear muslim female converts that swear that islam is a religion that supports woman rights and believes in freedom of speech which is idiotic but their islamic teachers will say anything to spread islam and the new converts with no critical reasoning skills just believe it.
Angemon says
Aceh has a more “conservative” observation of islam than the rest of Indonesia. Aceh is trying to impose sharia law.
Georg says
JUST. AWESOME.
xxxChurch100 says
Robert Spencer accurately says : Obama is misguided by the enemy, because he is one of them ….. and therefore untruthful .
There is only one person in the presidential race who understands the mess we are in and has an exit plan.
He tells of the tryanny which is Sharia Law and it being incompatible with the constitution, and the idiot mocking bird press and others call him islophobic .
VOTE 1 – DR BEN CARSON .. GOD BLESS AND PROTECT HIM !!!