And they will keep pushing it right up until the moment that the jihadis are at their door.
“As Jihad Advances, Huffington Post Still Pushing Muslim Victimhood Myth,” by Pamela Geller, Breitbart, October 26, 2015:
As presidential candidates are finding it tougher than ever before to ignore the reality of the global jihad, the Huffington Post is working harder than ever to push the Muslim victimhood myth.
Friday it published a whiny article by a hijab-wearing Muslim political science professor, Dalia F. Fahmy, titled “Silence on Rising Anti-Muslim Sentiment is Racist and Un-American.” This is bitterly ironic coming from HuffPo, which is unflaggingly silent about the worldwide jihad threat.
“Fear of Islam,” Fahmy claimed, “has become more prominent in everyday political discourse than ever before.” Imagine repeating this with a straight face in 2015, when Jews are being stabbed by Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar,” not just in Israel, but in France as well, as imams preach sermons in mosques while brandishing daggers and suicide vests, exhorting Muslims to stab Jews and “cut them into body parts.”
Is Dalia Fahmy okay with this incitement to genocide?
She begins her article with an account of a stabbing of a different kind: “This past Thursday, in Brooklyn, NY, a man was stabbed in the stomach in front of his wife and 5 year-old child. ‘I’m going to stab you because you’re Arabic and deserve it,’ his assailant allegedly stated.”
How do we know that the assailant said he was attacking because they were Arabs? How can we trust such claims after cases such as that of Shaima Alawadi? Kassim Alhimidi was convicted in April 2014 of beating his wife, Shaima Alawadi, to death in their California home. It was an Islamic honor killing, but it was more than that: after Shaima Alawadi was brutally beaten to death, the Alawadi family blamed Americans that oppose jihad for her murder.
Family members said they had found a note near Alawadi’s body, calling them terrorists and telling the family to go back where they came from. They said they had found a similar note at their home weeks earlier, but they didn’t keep it or report it.
The smear merchants, libelous Islamic supremacists, and their apologists went into overdrive. The media’s favorite Khomeinist and Iran nuke deal supporter, Reza Aslan, screamed bloody murder, blaming Robert Spencer and me for the murder. But when Shaima Alawadi’s husband was found to have been the perpetrator, and the “Islamophobic” note a fabrication, these jackals offered not one word of retraction or apology.
In a similar case in New Jersey, a Muslim named Kashif Parvaiz arranged the murder of his wife and told police that his wife had been attacked by “Islamophobes.”
Fahmy doesn’t mention those cases. Nor does she mention the New Jersey Muslim accused of beheading two Coptic Christians. Yet she takes the claims in the Brooklyn case at face value. But with all this precedent of deception, why should we?
Fahmy does mention, and lament, “the arrest of a boy with a clock.” Clock Boy Ahmed Mohamed is a sign of rising anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States? Clock Boy, who brought a clock that looked like a suitcase bomb to school and was then hailed as a hero worldwide and invited to the White House? Clock Boy who was celebrated at the United Nations, where he met world leaders, including the Prime Minister of Turkey?
Clock Boy who went to Sudan and hugged a genocidal and vicious mass murderer, its President Omar al-Bashir? Clock Boy who was showered with gifts by Microsoft and Google, and courted by MIT, all because he was a victim of “Islamophobia” when he wasn’t even a victim of “Islamophobia” at all, but of school officials’ zero-tolerance policy for weapons?
Meanwhile, one non-Muslim boy was suspended from school for reading the Bible during recess. Another seven-year-old boy was suspended for chewing his Pop Tart into the shape of a gun. Where are their invitations to the White House?
Remember: not 24 hours after meeting the President of the United States, Clock Boy Ahmed Mohamed’s family announced they were moving to Qatar because of “Islamophobia.” Ahmed’s sister said that Qatar was a lot like Texas, except that the family would be surrounded by “Muslims like themselves.” Isn’t that racist and supremacist?
There is no greater article of hate and misogyny than the burka. It is the most tangible anti-woman symbol known to the world. Covering up every inch of a woman is deeply offensive and insulting. But in America, Muslim women are free to wear it. In some Muslim countries under the sharia, however, Muslim women are not free not to wear it. Why doesn’t that arouse Fahmy’s ire?
Why, also, doesn’t Fahmy distinguish between beheading, jihad, and Islam? Why is fear of jihad, beheading, female genital mutilation, Jew-hatred, and creed apartheid not a value shared between Muslims and non-Muslims? Why does Fahmy ascribe opposition to all this to “anti-Muslim” sentiment? How “Islamophobic” of her.
The Huffington Post reports that the sky is green, every day, day in and day out, for years: they report that there is no jihad problem and that Muslims are victims. There is no reportage in the Huffington Post, no facts. There is fiction, only fiction. How can you argue against the anti-real? They are misleading Americans into complacency about the jihad threat. This is evil.

jihad3tracker says
WHAT COMES OUT OF THE MOUTH OF THIS WOMAN IS STEALTH JIHAD.
THAT IS — AND HAS BEEN — THE GAME PLAN FOR ISLAM WHEN MUSLIIMS CANNOT POSSIBLY DOMINATE AND CONTROL WITHIN THE POPULATION THEY INHABIT.
IT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO MUHAMMAD, THE “IDEAL MAN” FOR ALLAH’S WORSHIPPERS.
mortimer says
Mo wrote: “HuffPo shilling for Islam?” No, they are shilling for MARXIST THEORY…the theory that Muslims are in a NATIONAL LIBERATION STRUGGLE AGAINST EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM.
Objection 1: Islam is not a ‘race’, nor a ‘nation’, but a transnational ideology in competition with Marxism.
Objection 2: Islam is not ‘socialist’, but it is THEOCRATIC FASCISM which is opposed to socialism.
Objection 3: Islam’s leaders are its mullahs, rather than its politicians. The mullahs are the ones who decide the legitimacy of politicians and whether they deserve to be executed and replaced. The mullahs have all the power in Islam, not ‘the people’, so Islam is not a ‘people’s struggle’. The ‘people’ of Islam are the dupes of the ruling class of bourgeois mullahs.
jihad3tracker says
I usually do not give hotlinks to sources, because they can raise understandable suspicion as to whether they lead to troller’s trash. But, to save all you busy counter-jihad readers here a few mouse clicks, this is where the wonderful funny brilliant 24/7 expert David Wood explains my point :
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2012/01/three-stages-of-jihad.html
Start at exactly 8:09 and finish at 8:57 —- that’s 47 seconds; use it to reheat a cold cup of coffee while you check out the segment. BTW, those remarks are in a superb video of 24:50, featuring hilariously mendacious appearances by our Muslim-In-Chief. Worth watching for the meticulous quotes by David from the Trilogy, and his typical dark humor.
Jay Boo says
We need to build (bridges) with Muslims. Google (Bridges TV)
We could turn to the Muslim TV station owner of Bridges TV for help with understanding our Islamophobia but unfortunately he got sent to jail for beheading his wife.
I will list the Wiki link only because the Fox and others take a long time on a slow connection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzammil_Hassan
wildjew says
Speaking freely about Islam and jihad is increasingly under assault by the left. Over at thehill.com this morning I’ve been using some of the points made in this piece and other articles to argue President Obama is drawing a moral equivalence between ‘Palestinian’ terror and atrocities on the one hand and Israeli self-defense on the other. The moderator over there deleted at least a half a dozen of my posts in response to a supporter of Obama who demanded I give examples of moral equivalency from this administration. Mr. Zuckerberg disabled my Facebook account for a couple of weeks after he was caught in an open mic conversation with German Chancellor Angela Merkel who demanded he do something about the “racist” (anti-immigration) comments on his Facebook site.
wildjew says
Sorry, I should have written, I’ve been using some of the points made at Frontpagemag, this site, Pamela’s and other sites…..
john spielman says
liberalism (cf HUFFINGTON POST) is clearly a degenerative brain disease that is ultimately fatal unless treated early and frequently by REALITY ORIENTATION!!!
mortimer says
Disagree. HuffPo is CULTURAL MARXIST…i.e. ‘feel-good’ Marxists who have only the slightest idea of real Marxist theory…in other words, shallow, pseudo-intellectuals.
Don McKellar says
You constantly confuse the term Liberal for Leftists. There is an enormous difference, john spielman. Is it because you are too lazy to educate yourself or is it because you just have grown used to using the term liberal as a way to trash people? I would suggest you look up the opinions of a LIBERAL like Bill Maher or Richard Dawkins on Islam. And then compare that to what we see coming out of the mouths of LEFTISTS and LEFTIST publications like the Huffington Post. Once, a long time ago, the great newspapers and TV network news programs were run by LIBERALS who were all about equality and fair-minded journalism. They were appalled by Islam and never promoted like we see now. Over the decades — some time in the 1980’s it seems — those great LIBERALS were replaced by LEFTISTS. A LEFTIST is willfully ignorant and blindly follows a politically correct agenda no matter what the facts and reality are. A LIBERAL does not do that — the facts and context guide them. Often, their opinions are not popular and go against the general opinion. A LEFTIST is all about trying to conform to an accepted establishment opinion — of other leftists. A LEFTIST very quickly assumes a fascist attitude and name-calls when confronted on their belief system. A LIBERAL listens, considers, then speaks out using logic and critical thinking.
Now, if you’ve read what I just wrote, john spielman, then you can tell us all which you are behaving more like. Are you acting like a Leftist or a Liberal?
spot on says
Someone needs to classify all the different types of liberal. For example, a typical FDR liberal (sometimes called “classical” liberal) from the 1940’s would greatly dislike Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins but had great empathy for unions while not generally disliking business.
But I get your point and you are right.
john spielman says
Nancy Pelosi and Barack Hussein Obama ARE LIBERALS as
ARE the ACLU, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW ASSOCIATION! they are not Marxist, yet they are as dangerous as any Marxist as far as appeasing islam
john spielman says
ps; look at the new LIBERAL Prime minister of Canada and how he identifies with islam, going so far as worshiping in a mosque though he is nominally Roman Catholic
john spielman says
I should add the LIBERAL party of Canada is left of center with the Conservative party of Canada right of center and the New Democratic party of Canada extreme left/ socialist. So liberals can and often do side with the islam against us!
vcragain says
It is a pity that people have to jump into political labels – eg ‘libtards’ when posting here. Everyone who reads these pages is trying to get to grips with the concepts of Islamist ideology and what the ramifications might be. We are all looking for truth and understanding of this real life issue. I am generally a Liberal, so I want to give every idea and opinion ‘air’ time in order to try and arrive at a fair minded appraisal. This now is obviously a problem in listening to Islamist ideas as it is apparent to me since way back that this ideology has only one intention and that is subjugation of everyone. Without the freedom to discuss and disagree we have lost the ability to BE a Liberal. Now I know that, I am against all Muslim ideology – it’s quite simple – they have removed themselves from my consideration of ‘air’ time and nothing can put the clock back on that once it has been destroyed. Now the big problem is that too many Liberals out there have not yet arrived at the point I have – this will change as it becomes more and more apparent that there is no consideration from the other side. The real problem is that if the media live in fear of ‘upsetting’ Muslims, then truth IS getting suppressed. I want to try and get Liberals to understand that there is a point at which they must change their attitude for the sake of sheer survival – their own, if too much control is achieved by the Muslim factions of society. Wake up everyone, there is a snake in our midst which we can no longer just dismiss as ‘just another religious view among many’ – this is a WAR.
spot on says
My experience with the term “Liberal” is that it has changed with the political winds to suit “Leftists”. (I might suggest that others here at JW might do a better job than me at describing this term.) Leftist ideologues use this term as cover for their current dark left wing philosophy. There was a time when “Liberal” was considered to be a thinking person with a good heart and soul, but over the years with the degrading of this term by successive politicians and left wing political movements identified by the same name, and these same political movements destroying people’s lives, the term “Liberal” has come to mean something entirely different than the “Classical” Liberal, which originally defined a person with a good heart and thinking mind.
Today, Pol Pot, Stalin, and Mao could be called a “Liberal” since the Marxists have now taken over this term. Today the main stream media (and academia) is Marxist and they consider themselves “Liberal”. They steal this name to cover their true dark identities, which are Marxist and Communist. The main stream media ( and academia) have tremendous influence with the meaning of words.
I believe that anyone who is not a leftist, Communist, or Marxist ideologue should distinguish themselves as a “Classical” Liberal, meaning a thinking person with a good heart (not Marxist or leftist ideologue). Mr. Koch of the Koch Bros. defines himself as a “Classical” liberal but liberal political pundits like to hate him and tell everyone he is conservative. Many Classical Liberals are devout Christians and Jews. Some are atheists. Some are agnostics. Most “Classical Liberal” persons would today be called a “Conservative” by media “Liberals” aka Marxists and Communists.
Marxists and Communists love Islam because Islam is the enemy of Christians and Jews. “Classical Liberals” would defend Christians and Jews for a variety of good reasons against the onslaught of Islam. They would see Islamic killers for what they are…killers. The Media and political pundits consider Marxists and Communists as “Liberals”. They are using a good name as cover for their dark hearts. Only a dark heart can side with and defend the actions of Islamic killers (also the many past actions of Marxists and Communists).
Joseph says
1st, the Muslims are not a race.
2nd, If you really want to point out the greatest danger to a Muslim’s life and livelihood you have to review a few facts
Who is the greatest killer of Muslims?—-OTHER MUSLIMS
Who slanders Muslims like no other?—-OTHER MUSLIM SECTS
Who spreads the greatest amount of hate speech on Muslims?—-OTHER MUSLIMS
Who does the greatest amount of amputations as punishment—-OTHER MUSLIMS
Who does the greatest amount of body mutilations—-OTHER MUSLIMS
Who does the greatest amount of rapes against Muslims (women and men)—-OTHER MUSLIMS
Who abuses Muslim children (pedophilia) the most—-OTHER MUSLIMS
The media is strangely silent on these facts, the facts that the greatest danger to a Muslim is a fellow Muslim and the fact that they behave more like animals than human beings.
Fellow J.W. poster Stephanie(thanks S.) gave us this link and it shows just how barbaric they are.
http://www.zerocensorship.com/r/executions#axzz3pmPxr8tC
Remember this is only what made it into the news or onto the web. There are many times more atrocities than what is here.
spot on says
Someone needs to bring academic experts up to date on the realities of different cultures, however I doubt they would listen because they are Marxists trying to teach our kids to subvert our society. They are teaching our children to believe that Muslims are just poor nice people of color. That they are every bit as good as all the rest of us and that what we see in the Middle East, are just a few hooligans, criminals, barbarians, or savages that are not representative of Islam and Muslims.
I would suggest to anyone that this is exactly how it is presented to Europeans. As a result they see these “poor defenseless Muslims” as fleeing to “safe havens” in Europe from Middle Eastern “criminal” activity. “Islam is a peaceful religion, after all, don’t you see.”, they would say.
The fact is that the vast majority of Muslims feel great joy when they see killing and destruction of non Muslims. Faithful Muslims love this and they live for this. Tying non Muslims to the ancient Palmyra columns, an ancient non Muslim structure, filled with explosives to kill them and destroy these ancient artifacts of another culture brings them even greater joy. They even use such an event to advertise to other faithful Muslims to join them. Killing and destroying for Allah has been taught to all Muslims from birth and is the legacy of all faithful Muslims for the past 1400 years. Anything to the contrary is a big lie. They kill or maim non-faithful Muslims. There is no better authentic example of real Islam than in the Middle East where they continue to kill and destroy anything non-Muslim in the name of Allah to this very day.
Europeans are intuitively scared to death (and they have good reason to be) when they see the hatred in the eyes of this army of Islamic killers from the Middle East as they march through their cities. They are scared of death when they actually see all the Muslim’s faces. There human instincts kick in, in spite of everything they were taught in school and by Marxist media. While these invading Islamic killers deeply penetrate their cities, they know intuitively that their days are numbered. All the while their academics and their politicians continue to spew cum-by-yah multicultural rubbish. We here in the USA are next. Our Marxist academics, media, and politicians are on the same page as their European counterparts.
Joseph says
@ spot on, “All the while their academics and their politicians continue to spew cum-by-yah multicultural rubbish”
___________________________
I just love the way you covertly suggest that the politicians and academics are in bed with the Muslims and gleefully sucking on their dicks.
“cum-by-yah “…wish I would have thought of it.
spot on says
LOL!
Raja says
Spot on,
May I add something to your good post?
The white man, including others have damaged everything possible from mother earth (greenhouse effect) to demographics (mass implantation of supremacist looters in Islamist) Since the beginning it was not that way and CERTAINLY not reckless mass transplantation of a section of people as seen in Acts chapter 17 verse 26: and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him..
What we are witnessing today is akin to “ONLY GAYS ALLOWED” into our “holy lands”..The PCMC culture has made everything unnatural and beyond reason and repair.
spot on says
Raja, The Marxists and Communists have turned our education and communication system on it’s head. Any educational or communication endeavor should start with a search for truth. While it may be extremely difficult to uncover the truth at times, it is critical that we seek it. Today what we see is all about opinion, political power, and money. Our most educated people have given up on seeking truth. Without the search for truth there can be no open forum to fix things and people become fixated on phony obsessions such as PCMC.
Islam is taking full advantage of this opportunity to force their cult agenda upon free societies.
Mo says
HuffPo shilling for Islam? Wow, what a shock.
/sarc
I’d love to respond on the site, but I don’t have Facebook and that’s the only way they allow comments.
miriamrove says
What kind of other response one can expect of a Hijab wearing professor? A bunch PC BS and victim hood. m
Beagle says
‘I’m going to stab you because you’re Arabic and deserve it,’
— —
Does that sound anything like something a mad slasher would say in reality? Not to me.
Shmooviyet says
Exactly, Beagle.
We’d hear about THOSE occurrences– hoo boy, would we hear about it, just as we heard ad nauseam about poor little Achmed.
Shmooviyet says
Is the PuffyHo feeling a bit desperate? Weeping over ‘racism’ against islam while worldwide islamic horrors are continually displayed? C’mon. Where are the Israelis ( British, Canadians, Australians, Americans ) driving into groups of muslims at bus stops, then flailing away with knives, ‘Ho?
Angemon says
Hmmm. Sounds almost as credible as that story of “islamophobia on a plane” where the pilot allegedly apologized for his “white privilege”.
miriamrove says
where I live in NJ around here just 9 out of 10 people are leftist and PC. I was invited to a party and there there were a secular Pakistani both Physicians. Some how the subject of Muslims being profiled came up. The whole PC went into motion. Yes, yes, yes that is not right and all muslims are not terrorists all that BS. So I said who should they be profiling? Before anyone answered I then said 100% of terrorism are done by muslims and that is why they should be profiled. The Pakistani doctors who were secular(having wine) got upset and they said we are muslims do we look like terrorists? I said I do not what terrorists look like neither do the intelligence. I then asked him do I look like a terrorist? They said no and I said I was born and raised a muslim and since I do not want my A… to get blown up 30000 feet in the air I just like the of muslims are happy to be profiled and not get offended. The pary was quit for a few minutes after this conversation, but got going again!!!!!! m
Angemon says
“where I live in NJ around here just 9 out of 10 people are leftist and PC.”
My condolences, miriam 🙁
Raja says
Miriam,
What do you expect from slaves who were force-converted in the seventh century through Sindh province by Arabs? Not that the system was in any way useful to them or their society or for their peace as their hegemony continues to roll this day across Pakistan like an Octopus that spreads its tentacles.
Dave J says
The lack of intellectual honesty, the ease with which they lie, the consistent lack of apologies or corrections when the truth contradicts them is all part of the DECEPTION that is so appalling among the Islamic apologists. I guess when you have a “religion” that is based on lies and hatred this is the result.
So we see both frank honesty in the demands for domination and death to infidels at the same time that false complaints of Muslim victimization and Islamophobia are made, sometimes by the same people. It is a fractured view of the world that is only possible if you have been brainwashed by the Koran.
rubiconrest says
Crying Islamophobia will not reform of medieval Islam. I’m glad that a majority in the USA realize Islam has a problem and it is not non-Muslims who are at fault for saying so.
John Mays says
Victims with knives, hatchets, firebombs, grenades, bomb vests, and murder cars, WHICH THEY USE, ARE NOT VICTIMS. THEY ARE SAVAGES.
abad says
“Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar,” ”
As their eyes roll back into their heads, foam coming out of their mouths like mad dogs – Islam will always be the Religion of Insanity.
No clear thinking in Islam. Zip. Zilch. None.
Raja says
Abad,
I don’t understand the logic of shouting allah u akbar on every gun shot that is being fired. What has God to do with every bomb/mortar shell that goes off? May be it like calling out a superstitious mantra before firing a gun shot or mortar shell ! Please correct me if I am wrong..
wjsonl says
When the Pope, Catholic bishops, Jews, and world leaders (including the US, Germany, Italy, France, Canada, etc) choose to ignore the enemy (Islam), as an astronaut once said: “Houston, we have a problem.”
Raja says
Some hardened idiots won’t listen until it is too late.
Lenny Thetruth says
We are mollycoddling Islam. The adherents to it believe they are superior to infidels. In the eyes of the world, they are just appearing to some. People were set in a belief that a religion should be untouchable and not singled out by society as being harmful. But, Christian values are to give one the benifit of the doubt. We don’t want to infringe on peoples beliefs.
Islam is not a religion in the sense of teaching moral values. It teaches an idea of superiority based on following their word. Not equality, but superiority. Religeon usually teaches spriritual harmony by showing a way to live in harmony. Islam does not care about harmony, and it is time people recognize this. Most people think it won’t effect them, but it does.
These are the people who brought us 9/11. They felt justified. We have a Muslim president who refuses to indict Islam, despite the proof in front of our eyes. The liberal news media goes along with it, because, they are liberal, and have those Christian values, thinking the favor would be returned. Fallacious thinking my friends. That is not Islam, and they are not benign.
But, Huff-Post does not want to go there. They want to remain a liberal bastion. A font of real news, they are not. But, they apparently are not owned by Jews, or they probably would not print this nonsense. So, there goes that other myth.