• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Pamela Geller: The Media Frenzy on a News Story That Hadn’t Even Happened

Oct 11, 2015 12:11 pm By Robert Spencer

There was a great deal of mainstream media frenzy over the last few days about “heavily armed protesters” supposedly set to menace and harass innocent people at mosques nationwide. The media treated these protests as if it were absolutely gratuitous and offensive to hold protests at mosques, without making any mention, of course, of the fact that in four separate studies, each independent of one another, conducted by different groups since 1998 (including a Muslim group), each found that 80% of mosques in the US were teaching hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity to replace the U.S. Constitution with Sharia. The other 20% have not repudiated or separated themselves institutionally from the majority.

In 1998, Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, a Sufi leader, visited 114 mosques in the United States. Then he gave testimony before a State Department Open Forum in January 1999, and asserted that 80% of American mosques taught the “extremist ideology.” Then there was the Center for Religious Freedom’s 2005 study, and the Mapping Sharia Project’s 2008 study. Each independently showed that upwards of 80% of mosques in America were preaching hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity ultimately to impose Islamic rule. And in the summer of 2011 came another study showing that only 19% of mosques in U.S. don’t teach jihad violence and/or Islamic supremacism.

The coverage also, predictably enough, ignored the fact that the some of the protesters were armed only because of violence committed by Islamic jihadists against non-Muslims. No one was going to get shot at or killed unless jihadis showed up, and so in the event, no one was hurt.

The hysteria of Islamic supremacists was likewise predictable, and ironic in light of recent news stories such as these, about which, of course, they said not a word:

Islamic State threatens to murder 180 Christians unless it gets $12 million ransom

Video of devastated Christian family: Longtime Muslim friends and neighbors killed their children

Bangladesh: Muslims attack Christian pastor with knife, attempt to slit his throat

Islamic State murders 12 Christians for refusing to renounce Christ

Nigeria: “Boko Haram marked me for death because I converted to Christianity”

UK: Muslims assault, harass, threaten, persecute family, drive them from their home, for converting to Christianity

Bethlehem monastery torched by Islamic jihadists

Tanzania: Muslims torch three churches

Pakistan: Christian arrested after Muslim mob sets his house on fire

Yemen: Islamic jihadists torch Roman Catholic church in Aden

Texas: Armed Muslim enters church, says Allah told him to “slay infidels”

And that’s just going back three weeks. But none of these stories received the mainstream media attention that these protests did. And as Pamela Geller shows in this article, the media was already framing its narrative before the protests even happened.

Islam-jihad-rally

“The Media Frenzy on a News Story That Hasn’t Even Happened,” by Pamela Geller, Breitbart, October 9, 2015:

The media is in a constant state of frenzied panic to advance and promote the lie of Islamophobia and the Muslim-victimhood myth. Despite a complete lack of any real evidence, the media frames opposition of jihad terror, FGM, creed apartheid, gender apartheid as “islamophobia,” or this pearl, “anti-Muslim extremists,” as if one should support those things.

They take their marching orders from terror-tied groups like CAIR  and ISNA.

And the media mania to advance this complete fiction is at a fever pitch this week. There have been a number of news stories, crafted from whole cloth, about armed islamophobes descending upon poor, victimized Muslims this weekend. Protests against jihad terror are a rational response to the unspeakable carnage in the cause of Islam. But rest assured that the media will be at these protests, looking to capture a plant or infiltrator to splash across their front pages. The same pages that never print the word jihad.

The media is aligned with the jihad force, and no amount of death and destruction, rape and ruin is going to change one column inch of their narrative. Do they ever ask why not one mosque has instituted programs against jihad recruitment? Or why there is a mosque behind every jihad attack?

Here is a typical email exchange (unedited) between a US News and World Report reporter and me. Needless to say, they didn’t run it:

Steven Nelson of U.S. News & World Report wrote this to me:

Pam [sic],

I’m working on an article about this weekend’s anti-Islam mosque rallies. Do you support these, or have any involvement in them? And do you believe it’s possible they could they backfire and actually help radicalize some Muslims?

Steven Nelson

My response:

Steven,

I have no involvement in them. I support any lawful and peaceful effort to raise awareness of the nature and the magnitude of the jihad threat, and to defend the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the equality of rights of all people before the law, and individual rights. Your question about their backfiring and “radicalizing” Muslims is absurd. If a Muslim rejects and opposes jihad terror, he isn’t going to turn to jihad terror because of some anti-jihad protesters. In fact, Muslims who sincerely oppose jihad terror should join the protests. The media in a lather about something that has not even happened, presupposing that there will be violence against innocent Muslims, as it always does after every jihad attack and plot. Yet such violence never actually happens. The media is more concerned with those who oppose jihad terror than they are with jihad terror itself, and its death toll and the destruction it wreaks on countries, communities and entire cultures.

Steven Nelson came back with this: 

Thanks for the response. Do you believe it’s a mistake for organizers to choose “every mosque” (regardless of the variety of Islam they preach) as a protest location, as it seems to conflate their anti-jihad message with targeting of all observant Muslims?

Or is that just a golden opportunity for Muslims to join in?

To which I responded: 

It’s neither. It’s a recognition of the fact that four separate studies, each independent of one another, conducted by different groups since 1998 (including a Muslim group), each found that 80% of mosques in the US were teaching hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity to replace the U.S. Constitution with Sharia. The other 20% have not repudiated or separated themselves institutionally from the majority.

Perhaps they are protesting mosques because right now, nothing is being done to stop jihad recruiting in US mosques, even as several hundred young Muslims from the US have gone to wage jihad for the Islamic State. I expect that the organizers are trying to raise awareness about the need for Muslims in the US not just to denounce ISIS, but to teach young Muslims why this understanding of Islam is wrong and must be rejected. While Muslims in the US condemn the Islamic State, where are they teaching against the ideology that gave rise to it?

If the moderates really reject extremism, let them show it by instituting genuine programs to teach against this view of Islam.

I did not hear back, so I wrote to Steve: 

Steven, Please send a link to your piece. I would love to share it with my readers.

And he basically said, uh, never mind.

Pam,

Right now it looks like we’re going to wait and see what happens this weekend. I’ll be sure to let you know if I end up using your commentary.

Steven

But the Washington Post was beating the jihad drum and ran with this vicious propaganda quoting Heidi Beirich of the far-left hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center, which smears and defames anyone who opposes its hateful, authoritarian agenda. Beirich, the article says, “describes the protesters as a loose affiliation of anti-Muslim extremists who do not seem to be organized by larger, better-known anti-Muslim groups, such as Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative. She said: “This mix of racist groups, anti-Muslim groups and anti-government groups is basically a recipe for disaster.”

No. What is a recipe for disaster is how the mainstream media abets U.S. Muslim groups’ efforts to portray Muslims as victims and deflect attention away from the genuine threat of jihad terror.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: claiming victim status, Featured, journalistic bias, mosques Tagged With: Steven Nelson, US News & World Report


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 12:22 pm

    The agitprop issued the last few days by the news entertainment industry is negative pre-conditioning. The population is being conditioned to understand that protesting at mosques is verboten, and is likely to entail felony charges and prison time, plus heavy fines.

    The other 20% have not repudiated or separated themselves institutionally from the majority.

    The 20% have not repudiated the 80% because they are the same in terms of content. The only way for a mosque to get into the 20% is to trick the sampling process. Well, that’s not quite true. They could drop the god-commanded hatred of Jews and Christians content, and the god-command for global Sharia, but at that point they are no longer Islamic and are only former-mosques, buildings filled with apostates, the occupants in which are to be punished by death.

    The news entertainers never get into the dirty details, though. That would be bad TV, nobody is entertained at being hated and subjugated.

    • jihad3tracker says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 12:59 pm

      To A.P.F. —

      I am optimistic about what the C.I.C. [ Counter-Islam Cadre represents — can we use that from here onward as a newly created term? ] If we toss the word “pre-conditioning” into those Americans’ field of view, what will come back in reply is something close to “If a pussy-ass clueless Allah-enabling wimp sticks his or her face in my zone, there will be tons of educational fun to follow.”

      In other words, the 85-90 percent of us who DO NOT live in relatively large cities, and are not brainwashed by leftist media, are FULLY AWAKE NOW. THERE IS NO GOING BACKWARDS — THE IDIOTS AT CAIR BROUGHT HAVE NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEMSELVES.

      And to DeMolay — The same overwhelming percentage of Americans know that the SPLC is a collection of lying scum regarding Islam. “Defamation” is what Heidi Beirich does to buy her dog food and resole her moccasins. Why waste time, energy, money on a POS organization ???

  2. DeMolay says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 12:31 pm

    Can’t the group that demonstrated sue the ass off Beirich for deformation?
    If hurt feelings over a clock is worth millions then *actual* misrepresentation of people must be?
    Put the whole lot, including CAIR into administration. World would be a better (and safer) place.

    • DeMolay says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 12:33 pm

      *defamation

      Autocorrect is a bitch

    • DeMolay says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 12:34 pm

      *defamation

      Autocorrect is a bitch

  3. DeMolay says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 12:36 pm

    Apologies for my autocorrect typos, for some reason my corrective posts aren’t appearing.

    Defamation !!! Not deformation.

  4. Angemon says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 1:12 pm

    Your question about their backfiring and “radicalizing” Muslims is absurd. If a Muslim rejects and opposes jihad terror, he isn’t going to turn to jihad terror because of some anti-jihad protesters.

    Indeed.

  5. Don McKellar says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 3:09 pm

    This story really is symbolic of the era in which we live. A Mainstream Media taken over by leftist stooges and do-nothings who, when they don’t have a tabloid disaster celebrity of family to use for easy headlines or can simply reprint things verbatim off the newswire, then they look to make up stories that fit their political agenda. “You provide the prose poems, I’ll provide the war” – Citizen Kane

  6. Peggy says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 6:39 pm

    Your question about their backfiring and “radicalizing” Muslims is absurd. If a Muslim rejects and opposes jihad terror, he isn’t going to turn to jihad terror because of some anti-jihad protesters.

    ————————–
    Any criminal can say the same thing. If people protest against pedafiles does that mean that more people are going to become pedafiles? How about protesting against drugs? Is this going to result in more addicts? So whatever we protest against we run the risk of creating more is what some idiots are telling us.

  7. Veronica says

    Oct 12, 2015 at 4:56 am

    Maybe the truth is that everyone is so SCARED of being associated with ANY anti-Muslim statement (Paris anyone?) that they are now all making sure their publication says nothing anti-Muslim ??
    I have become very aware of this subject over the last couple of years, do not trust this religion and have certainly asked myself if it is wise to say so? THAT is the problem !!!!!

  8. Laura says

    Oct 12, 2015 at 3:39 pm

    I believe one of the “issues” we run into is the way the media frames the argument as “they are anti-muslim” instead of us pushing back by saying, “NO, we are anti-islam” In my mind, that is a big difference. Islam is irreparable. An individual muslim may not be irredeemable. JMHO.

  9. Dr. Divinity says

    Oct 12, 2015 at 7:00 pm

    When and only when the powers that be recognize the absolute fact that Islam is a CULT then and only then can mosques be cleaned out and Islam defeated …..CULTS can be destroyed

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • OLD GUY on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • OLD GUY on UK: Woman converts to Islam, distributes Islamic State jihad terror videos

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.