• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK courts favor Muslims over non-Muslims

Oct 10, 2015 7:39 pm By Robert Spencer

The suicide of yet another Western country, unfolding before us with astounding rapidity.

sharia-future UK

“Unequal Justice: UK Favouring Muslims Over Non-Muslims In Court,” by Johanna Markind, Breitbart, October 8, 2015:

There have been a couple of disturbing signs lately that the United Kingdom no longer aspires to have one law for all, that instead UK Muslims are entitled to preferential treatment. Both signs take the form of extending special privileges to Muslim women in judicial proceedings.

The result may be to disadvantage non-Muslims vis-à-vis Muslims, while simultaneously institutionalizing the sexism of Sharia law against Muslim women.

Raping Muslims More Serious Than Raping Non-Muslims

The United Kingdom has chosen to allow rape of an “Asian” girl to be sanctioned more severely than a similar crime committed against a white girl.

As noted previously, British authorities frequently use “Asian” as a synonym for “Muslim,” as in a government report of sex-grooming in Rotherham. The report describes perpetrators of this scandal as “Asian” and sometimes “Pakistani,” but it is clear that many of the perpetrators are Muslim because the response refers to training packages for Muslim community leaders.

Authorities ignored the situation for 16 years, partly because of their contempt for the victims – underage “white” girls – and partly out of fear that they would be branded as “racist” (read, “Islamophobic”) for prosecuting the perpetrators.

On September 10, 2015, an appeals court agreed with a sentencing judge’s decision to impose a longer sentence on Jamal Muhammed Raheem Ul Nasir for sexually assaulting two underage “Asian” girls (at least one of whom was under age 13) because his victims allegedly suffered more than white girls would.

A little perspective. Studies of how the death penalty is applied in the United States have suggested that it is imposed in a racially biased manner, based on the race of the victim (as distinct from bias based on race of perpetrator); crimes against white people are more likely to result in the death penalty than crimes against black people. When slavery was legal in the United States, murder of a white person was legally sanctioned more severely than murder of a black person. The heavier penalty was a way of treating the crime against a white person as inherently more serious than a similar crime against a black person. There was a logic behind it.

White people had more rights than black people under the law and were an elevated caste. Let us assume that the Nasir court’s motives are sincere and its intentions benign. One could certainly argue that the victims are at least potentially in danger of suffering more. Their families may murder them for the “crime” of “dishonouring” the family by having been raped (see here, here, here, here, and here).

Nevertheless, penalizing rape of a Muslim girl more severely than rape of a non-Muslim girl simply institutionalizes racism/religious discrimination and Sharia law (or at least, Sharia law as some Muslims – such as those affiliated with ISIS – understand it), and perhaps also the sexism that condones “honour” crimes. Another way of looking at the decision is that it resurrects feudal law, in which different estates had different legal rights at duties. It makes Muslim victims a higher estate whose members have greater worth than non-Muslims.

It also gives rapists a perverse incentive that, if they’re going to rape somebody, it’s better to rape a non-Muslim, because its potential consequences would be less severe. It accepts the same rationale used by the Rotherham perpetrators in selecting their victims. One would have hoped UK authorities would have been more sensitive to accepting this mindset and slighting the Rotherham victims barely a year after the government’s report on that scandal was released.

Right to Face Muslim Accuser and Evaluate Evidence

In the name of cultural sensitivity, Lord Neuberger, the President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, said last April that Muslim women should be allowed to wear a veil in court, even when testifying.

The issue came up two years ago in the trial of a niqab-wearing Muslim woman accused of witness intimidation. Judge Peter Murphy ruled that the defendant must remove her veil when testifying, but could wear it at other times. He explained, “The ability of the jury to see the defendant for the purposes of evaluating her evidence is crucial… The right to give evidence involves a corresponding duty to submit that evidence to the scrutiny of the jury.”

If Lord Neuberger has his way, the jury’s right to evaluate a witness’s demeanour will not apply when the witness is a veiled Muslim woman. Jurors will see only what she chooses to show them.

Even more disturbing is the prospect that a veiled witness may testify against a third party. A criminal defendant’s right to confront witnesses against him or her, enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, grew out of British law. It was a safeguard that arose from abuses like the trial of Sir Walter Raleigh, who was condemned in part on the evidence of alleged co-conspirator Lord Cobham. Raleigh demanded the opportunity to confront and cross-examine Cobham. His demand was rejected and he was condemned and sentenced to death (although the king spared his life). Now, defendants may have the right to confront in name but not reality, as the accuser (if a Muslim woman) may be masked.

This radical departure has faced opposition from prominent quarters. Baroness Hale, the UK’s senior female judge, and Prime Minister David Cameron have both opposed the measure on the grounds that fact-finders must be able to see a witness’s face.

In form, both of the above changes give, or would give, an elevated legal status to Muslim women. Sex crimes against them have been sanctioned with extra severity and, if the President of the UK Supreme Court has his way, they will be able to give evidence for themselves or against someone else without exposing themselves to the scrutiny a jury and criminal defendant have in any other context. Arguably, these exceptions are motivated, and may contribute to, subjugation of women as the property of their families (here, here, and here). The net effect is still to enshrine a version of Islamic mores in British law and to elevate Muslims over non-Muslims.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, Featured, United Kingdom, Useful idiots Tagged With: Jamal Muhammed Raheem Ul Nasir, Rotherham


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Angemon says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 8:30 pm

    • cs says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 8:42 pm

      If you see the comments on the daily mail, it seems that people, the average people who even don’t bother much about this sort of thing, even they are well aware of it. I believe it is a matter of time when a wave of reaction will sweep all over through the whole Europe. They are pushing the envelope just to hard.

      • jayell says

        Oct 11, 2015 at 2:35 am

        The comments in the Daily Mail are censored. Certain words are programmed into the moderating software, and if you manage to get past that (using 5’s instead of ‘s’, or astericks, deliberate mis-spellings or deliberating mis-spacings), or they’re not moderating comments for some reason and you say something that’s not ‘in line with acceptable current thinking’, then you get a nasty email banning you and threatening to contact employers, etc. So I think you can safely assume that what you see in the comments in the ‘Mail’ is little more than a clue as to what people really think and say. The best indication is in the red or green arrows, but even they can be manipulated, of course. I think you can also safely assume that what’s true of the ‘Mail’ is also true of the rest of the ‘controlled media’, who also manipulate news stories to over-hype those that want in order to bury other stories or anaethetise public opinion, or suppress others, partially or completely, for the same reasons (and of course the BBC is an out-and-out propaganda machine in this respect with its very own agenda). That’s why not many people knew much about the muslim grooming gangs and other misdemeanours in the muslim community, and it explains why they’ve been able to successfully run all these witch-hunts against media figures as a smoke screen to cover the whole muslim paedophile grooming debacle.

        If you follow the UK press, you can see them using the same tactics all the time, deflecting attention away from things they DON’T want you to know about by inventing or over-hyping other things or deliberately promoting trivia for the front pages to ‘make you feel good’ when you really shouldn’t. Best examples – the Royals (an excellent aneasthetic, now obviously being over-done), Jeremy Corbyn (hate-figure, but can’t really over-do HIM and better than the witch-hunts), the UK economy (apparently doing quite well – or so we’re told?), UK house prices (ridiculously high, supposed to make home-owners feel good?), the Falklands (not really an issue), the EU……. Where things aren’t turning out as ‘THEY’ want or cats are getting out of bags, the UK establishment either goes very quiet or very nasty. For example the Kangaroo-Court treatment of Nick Griffin when he was spilling the beans on the muslim paedophiles (you notice that the papers are bit by bit pushing HIS line now??? And no one mentions him any more????) and the way in which they’re trying to sweep Cliff Richard (Christian indigenous male – note!!) under the carpet when that bit of witch-hunting went disastrously wrong, and the increasing ‘anti’ campaign against ‘migrants’ now that it’s glaringly obvious that they’re ‘bad news’.

        But people are not noticing the increasing ‘gynomania’ and blatant misandry in the UK, which is evident in both the courts (bias in divorce and family matters, grossly unfair sentencing and ridiculous leniency towards women), the media (blatantly obvious over-promotion of women and blatant, even slanderous belittling of men) and in the economy, education and employment (like wise blatant over-promotion of women in the name of ‘equality’???). This seems to be in line with the deliberate destruction of British culture and part-and-parcel of it, as though the men have been (seen as) responsible for transmitting and upholding cultural standards (don’t really understand why that should be, but it seems to be the case) and must now be effectively destroyed and replaced with a foreign model (just like they’re selling off UK industry – and also look at the way non-indigenous males are being over-hyped inb the media?). There’s obviously a deliberate pattern to it all. Can anyone explain it logically?

        • jayell says

          Oct 11, 2015 at 10:03 am

          I’ve just noticed that I’ve used the word ‘blatant’ quite a lot in that last paragraph. But that’s the problem. A lot of things are happening in the UK that are so obviously out-of-order, you get some people protesting, but nothing comes of it and ‘things’ just go on as before if not getting worse. Perhaps one of the most unacceptable aspects of this is the way in which people rightly condemn muslims for their appalling mysoginy, yet, with amazingly complacent hypocrisy, commit the most blatant (yes, that word again)and unacceptable misandry over here. Are they amazingly bigotted, or amazingly stupid, or both?

      • Shane says

        Oct 11, 2015 at 11:05 am

        There have been a lot of protests in Europe over accepting the Muslim invaders, but most of the MSM will not cover it. These corrupt journalists do not want Americans to protest Obama’s plan to bring in 200,000 of these Muslim invaders into the USA as refugees.

        Migrants trampled on the food and demanded money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U36fCE_vCE
        Migrant Crisis The Footage the Media Refuses to Broadcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHKvWjJypiM
        German Media Caught Covering Up Rapes By Migrant

  2. Wellington says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 8:50 pm

    So sad to see Britain, the forger of one of the greatest civilizations in world history, descending as it has. It is beyond tragic. In some respects it is criminal and even treasonous. It is certainly replete with “stupid” written all over it.

    On a specific matter, and I might add here preliminarily I know my Bagehot, the present monarch, I would contend, has let her nation down. Elizabeth II has presided over a once free country which is no longer free. She has said nothing, even in the most veiled terms, of London becoming, in effect, Londonistan, of Britain becoming a nation where speaking the truth about the spiritual fascism which is Islam can actually land you in jail. She has looked away time and time again as the UK has descended into something far worse than the UK that existed when she assumed the throne in 1952. She needed by now to put her office on the line because, as LBJ said about the American Presidency, what good is any office if you can’t put it on the line from time to time. And she never has.

    The Queen, I would argue, has been dismal. She seems to care only for the preservation of her title and her immediate family. This is not nearly enough. I would argue that one knows this or should know it.

    Also, look who’s waiting in the wings, so to speak———-the future Charles III with all his goofiness and apologetics for Islam. My God, the British monarchy, a great institution this American would argue, has not been served well by its present occupant or by its heir apparent.

    • marty says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 1:20 pm

      Though I think the young princes are fully deserving of A list celebrity,
      (they do actually set a great example), the Queen has been a great disappointment
      as protector of the UK.
      Sadly, she seems happy to sign away our freedoms to the Continentals, and
      so is quite useless constitutionally. She launches the odd ship etc, but that’s
      all.
      We need a much stronger constitution which forbids ceding powers to foreign
      courts & parliaments.
      Since the UK is not a democracy in any real sense I have no problem with a monarch
      & a set of advisors of impeccable credentials prepared to say “no”, and not
      have what we presently posses – the most expensive rubber stamp on Earth.

    • Lenny Thetruth says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 5:15 pm

      In fairness to the queen, she is a figurehead. She is propped up by the people, but other than using her words, she has no power. It seems she has the function of only being the queen. She does not make laws. She does not rock the cart. It is up to lawmakers to define what is legal and what isn’t. The queen just headlines the show.

      Since the country is Islamifying, I would suggest that you impose a tax on Islam. They know the tax as Jizyah, and it is mandated that non-Muslims pay a tax for being allowed to live amongst Muslims. It is mandated in the Koran and Hadith that Muslims follow. If it is okay in their home countries, they should accept it for themselves too.

      Also understand that not all Asians are Muslims, and not all Muslims are Asians. The readership here is open to the English speaking world, and we don’t all speak the same English. But we can agree on some other basic things. We, in the US believe in calling something what it is. We say you cal a spade a spade. You do that because other names are already taken, and a spade is not a rose.

  3. d says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 9:12 pm

    Where is Queen Elizabeth? Where is she to stand up and DO something about the descent of the UK? Why doesn’t she break her silence and deliver an historic speech and change the course of history? This is her moment to seize.

    She should end her silence with the greatest , most truthful speech that anybody will ever make on the problem with Islam, the moslem colonization that is destroying the UK and Europe. She should bring up everything from Rotherham and Rigby. She should shame Cameron for making excuses for Islam rather than speaking honestly. She should pronounce Merkel the madwoman that she is and explain that Germany doesn’t have to keep paying for the sins of their grandfathers. She should demand honesty from the Pope and make a plea for prosecuted Christians and other religious minorities around the globe in the name of Islam. She should point out that Islam is the exact opposite of humanism — both secular and Christian. She should point to the evil that men do by emulating Muhammad and his criminal example.

    The Queen could end her historic reign as a great hero who told it like it is and stood up for what is right no matter what those who would have the common man on his knees thought. She would change the entire dialogue on this issue and shock the modern advanced world into action — or at least she could try her damn best!

    • mortimer says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 9:53 pm

      Queen Elizabeth gets a chance to raise such concerns in her weekly interview with the PM. Remember Prince Charles on his own initiative organized a meeting this year to bring all UK religious leaders together to discuss the persecution of Christians by ISIS.

    • seth morgan says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 10:07 pm

      The first duty of the sovergin king or queen is “protector of the faith”….Queen Elizabeth is a rotten monarch!!!
      She sits over David’s throne under the Jacob’s pillar, the stone of scone crowned over.
      She is the Last monarch to be crowned…Phillip or William,.no!!!…. Elizabeth is the last.
      Great Britain no more.

      • Dr. Divinity says

        Oct 11, 2015 at 4:31 pm

        UK = UNEQUAL KINGDOM…….DK = DOOMED KINGDOM. NH = NO HOPE as well all of Europe and coming to neighborhood near you really soon.. What a mess we have allowed to happen to our world.

    • William says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 10:53 pm

      The British Monarchy will do nothing to upset the apple cart. They just have too much to lose. It will require someone with little to lose to rock the ship of state out of its doldrums, or is it its indolence.

    • simpleton says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 11:45 pm

      Hear hear, Wellington, d, seth morgan.

      For mortimer;- Just google “prince charles praise islam” and it will show through the years of his support that way, and now to be of “faiths” so to ride the “interfaith” band wagon “to bring all UK religious leaders together to discuss the persecution of Christians by ISIS”.
      Is he following the ” European Society Coudenhove-Kalergi”
      http://www.european-society-coudenhove-kalergi.org/europaeischebriefe_verzeichnis1.asp
      http://tinyurl.com/ppzq9jf
      that awarded Chancellor Angela Merkel the European Prize 2010. which she gladly accepted the award at the Federal Chancellery of Germany.
      http://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/ContentArchiv/EN/Archiv17/Artikel/_2011/01/2011-01-13-merkel-europapreis_en.html
      http://tinyurl.com/pjzto4z
      Did Merkel think she was in line for a nobel peace prize? with that same philosophy as espoused by Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

      The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

      So calling for that interfaith meeting is Prince Charles looking for awards too?

      QE2 should be pointing out as Churchill did in Parliament of 12th November 1936 of the British Government’s lack of response to Germany’s reoccupying the Rhineland

      So they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful for impotency.

      and to think she has possibly been saying this every week to the recent PMs of Britain. Yeah right
      She even meet Churchill weekly at the beginning of her reign for about 3 years. 1952-1955 and lived through WW2 while he was PM.

      She makes speeches such as her Christmas Eve speeches which really obviously pushes the diversity theme of peoples, but is this where she stops when one sees for the past decade of immigration which certainly increased through the Tony Blair years and nor slowed even now. The result being more the push to a “ diversity of individual ” and the resulting change it has on her “own English laws” ! ! ! Freedom of Speech restricted by “Hate laws”.,People being arrested for even reading out passages from Winston Churchill book, even if later charges are dropped.

      • Jon says

        Oct 11, 2015 at 5:18 pm

        I have no problems with the ‘mixing of the races’ but I draw the line at mixing of faiths, particularly if the predominant faith is likely to be Islam/Sharia. All social change should be aiming towards advancement, not regression into some dark medieval past with all the manifest horrors we see on our screens daily.
        I think that Prince Charles did us all a very bad service dressing up in Saudi robes and doing sword dances. The man’s a moron and I cringe at the thought of him as protector of England’s faith.

    • Marty says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 1:24 pm

      100% with you. D.
      As for Prince Charles, he loves dressing up as an arab &
      often praises Islam.
      When the last King of Saudi Arabia died, the idiots hung flags at
      half mast on Westminster Abbey, even though Christians are
      horribly persecuted in Saudi & all islamic states.

  4. somehistory says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 10:01 pm

    This is a terrible thing. Poor girls…unprotected from rape by those descended…directly or through their death cult… from the vilest creature that ever set a dirty foot on the soil of earth. The bacteria must have gagged and barfed after his passing. Flies on the walls of the courts are gagging over these decisions.

    These children, if they have studied any of the history of *Great* Britain, must wonder why their lives and welfare count for so little in light of who were their ancestors.

    Fear. Those *in charge* of what is allowed or not allowed are experiencing naked fear and using the children to shield themselves.

    (Revelation 13)

  5. mortimer says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 10:06 pm

    The KKK’s mask is a threat. The Islamic veil is an implied threat to women who don’t wear one.

    Veil’s are threats and should be banned in the way replica assault weapons should be banned.

  6. mortimer says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 10:12 pm

    One of the things that was resolved in the English Reformation was the question of ecclesiastical courts that were more lenient than the royal courts. As a result justice was often thwarted.

    By being more lenient to Muslims, the English courts bring themselves into disrepute.

  7. Joseph says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 10:13 pm

    So why don’t you just leave then.
    No one invited you.
    We don’t like what you do.
    We don’t want you here.
    What don’t you understand?

    • Don McKellar says

      Oct 10, 2015 at 11:08 pm

      And go where? Back to the Islamic rat holes they came from? Without any welfare? Like that’s going to happen. The only reason they’re going to leave is for a short “tour of duty” for the Islamic State because they feel an obligation to the Caliphate. And then they come back to the open arms of Cameron’s Britain.

  8. Dave J says

    Oct 10, 2015 at 10:31 pm

    Masked accusers are OK?

    Britain, home of democratic procedures and judicial systems, WTF?

    Back to the 7th Century we go.

  9. medaber_emet says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 2:02 am

    the stupid English are doomed
    but what really amazes me is that you Americans are also following the same path
    and you don’t learn anything
    you repeatedly elected the rug-head Obama that explicitly want to islamize the USA.
    now whats happening?!!!!
    because of the stupidity and the incompetency of the west (angela mother teroriza)
    the fucking arabs here in Israel have developed and increased appetite to come and kill the jews
    hope we will shut every last one of them
    i tell you now and since i was not wrong up until now
    my estimate is
    it the west wont wake up in time
    the whole world will live under sharia and all the kuffars will live as slaves
    in case that the west will wake up in time
    we will have to conquer all the middle east meaning saudia and the Persian julf
    then we will transfer all the muslims to that area
    islam must be reformed to take out violence and supremacy
    also an international military will have to make sure that the fucking muzzies wont built any armies

    • Frank Courtney says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 5:54 am

      That’s the best e e cummings poem I’ve read …

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 10:41 am

      islam must be reformed to take out violence and supremacy

      Then go to OfficeMax and buys some big erasers, cuz you’re gonna have to delete Allah and the Holy Prophet Mohammed from the Holy Ko-Ran and the Aha-Deaths, at which point the two tomes will be reduced to flaccid pulp laying castrated between the book cover at either end.

  10. Shane Brandon says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 2:17 am

    Had the present monarch been Winston Churchill,we would never have had to experience this horror that the so called British leadership are putting Britain through.
    Now more than ever Britain needs men and women to step up to the plate with courage and conviction and rid us of this brutal filth.Instead we have men and women stepping up to the plate with politically correct complacency and cowardice.Sooner or later it will end in bloodshed,because they will listen to nothing else but a force that is greater than theirs.Rule Brittannia.

  11. Godwin says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 2:20 am

    Now I am ashamed of UK which had once ruled proudly the lands that the sun never sets with its able administrators. Due to the current corrupt politicians, it has descended into such a pathetic stage. IT HAS LOST ITS DIGNITY AND MY ADMIRATION.

  12. Mark A says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 2:50 am

    I was born in the UK and could live there if I choose to.

    But I do not want to live in the UK. I live in another country and I definitely do not want to move back to the UK.

    This is just one example of why I wouldn’t want to live in the UK anymore. The UK is on a rapid downhill slide into something I want no part of.

    Sad to see a once great nation that has contributed so much to western civilization sliding downward into the abyss and gradually giving up its institutions and freedoms bit by inexorable bit.

  13. Michael Warden says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 3:11 am

    Several comments have been made here regarding the role of Queen Elizabeth II in the invasion crisis. All, I think, have been pretty fair and rather restrained. It should be noted that she has reneged on her Coronation Oath every time she signed a document transferring more power to the European Union. She is perhaps the one symbol that could put a bomb up the rear ends of a docile public – but she will not. It is generally understood that many years ago she was told to sign papers and shake hands etc and her family will continue to rule. God knows what will happen when we have Charles III, that sharia compliant pillock. Perhaps William V will prove a better King – if the monarchy still exists and we are not a muslim republic. Civil war looms in Europe in several countries but in good old England, if the rape of several thousand young girls – some as young as eleven – will not stir the people against the muslim horde, I don’t know what will. All the queen has to do is make some comment publicly – that would do it. Incidentally, she is NOT the legal monarch being descended from Henry VII who was himself from an illegitimate line – but I don’t suppose it matters now.

    • simpleton says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 6:17 am

      Hear hear, Wellington, d, seth morgan.,Michael Warden mortimer

      Just google “prince charles praise islam” and it will show through the years of his support that way, and now to be of “faiths” so to ride the “interfaith” band wagon “to bring all UK religious leaders together to discuss the persecution of Christians by ISIS”.
      Is he following the ” European Society Coudenhove-Kalergi”
      http://www.european-society-coudenhove-kalergi.org/europaeischebriefe_verzeichnis1.asp
      that awarded Chancellor Angela Merkel the European Prize 2010. which she gladly accepted the award at the Federal Chancellery of Germany.
      http://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/ContentArchiv/EN/Archiv17/Artikel/_2011/01/2011-01-13-merkel-europapreis_en.html

      Did Merkel think she was in line for a nobel peace prize? with that same philosophy as espoused by Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

      The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

      So calling for that interfaith meeting is Prince Charles looking for awards too?

      QE2 should be pointing out as Churchill did in Parliament of 12th November 1936 of the British Government’s lack of response to Germany’s reoccupying the Rhineland

      So they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful for impotency.

      and to think she has possibly been saying this every week to the recent PMs of Britain. Yeah right
      She even meet Churchill weekly at the beginning of her reign for about 3 years. 1952-1955 and lived through WW2 while he was PM.

      She makes speeches such as her Christmas Eve speeches which really obviously pushes the “diversity theme of peoples”, but is this where she stops when one sees for the past decade of immigration which certainly increased through the Tony Blair years and nor slowed even now. The result being more the push to a “ diversity of individual ” and the resulting change it has on her “own English laws” ! ! ! Freedom of Speech restricted by “Hate laws”.,People being arrested for even reading out passages from Winston Churchill book, even if later charges are dropped.

  14. Michael Warden says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 3:26 am

    Further to my comments re Elizabeth Windsor nee Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, I too have had postings deleted on British sites or not posted at all. I am banned on one site (reason unspecified) and on my local newspaper (Lynn News in King’s Lynn), I received an email stating that my posting had been removed because of Hate Speech ( a Criminal Offence here in free, democratic England). I explained that the Hate Speech was not mine because I was quoting the Koran. I don’t expect any of my letters to “Opinion” will ever be printed. That’s how they do it folks.

    • Jon says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 5:57 am

      That can also happen on the Guardian, that great harbinger of free speech in the 19th century. They have their ‘Comment is Free’ column (CiF) but that doesn’t mean they allow all opinions. Anything that touches too critically on Muslims or homosexuals can get the boot very quickly despite the post running for a while, even drawing comments. They just erase the post saying ‘comment not within our acceptable standards’ or words to that effect. Yet leftists are free to swear and abuse writers with whom they disagree!

  15. No Fear says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 4:22 am

    Next it will be a case of “If a muslim testifies, then the words are true; if a kafir testifies then the words are false”. Welcome to Sharia in the UK.

  16. StarWish246 says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 4:34 am

    Doesn’t Queen Elizabeth, her family members, and the royal families of Europe, know that they ALL are potential targets? It would just take ONE suicide attack to change their royal history.

  17. Jon says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 5:53 am

    In under-age sex cases in the UK, Muslims often self-identify by pleading in defence that their Koran instructs them to follow the example of Mohammed, himself a paedophile.

  18. Tom says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 7:11 am

    This article notes that Sir Walter Raleigh, a oppressor and murderer of the Irish for which he was richly rewarded by Elizabeth I (see here to get a taste of his viciousness: ( http://www.irish-society.org/home/hedgemaster-archives-2/people/raleigh-sir-walter ) demanded to confront and cross examine his accuser, Lord Cobham, at his treason trial. “His demand was rejected and he was condemned and sentenced to death (although the king spared his life)”, writes Ms. Markind. That was November, 1603. Raleigh was imprisoned in the Tower for the next 14 years. In 1617, he was released to led an expedition to Venezuela in search of “El Dorado”, the fabled “City of Gold”. He promptly disobeyed the King’s instructions and attacked a Spanish outpost thereby violating the Treaty between England and Spain. When he returned to England James I reinstated the sentence of death from the Treason trail and Raleigh was beheaded on October 29, 1618.

  19. duh_swami says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 8:37 am

    The UK is up to its lower lip in Isamo-slime…It’s now against the law to make waves…Splashing will be persecuted, then prosecuted..’Thou shalt not splash, lest ye be splashed…shall be the law of the land’…Allah willing, and it looks like he is…..

  20. Peter Hyatt says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 9:16 am

    I believe it is too late for Germany and Sweden. My hope is that it will be our wanting here in the US.

    But for either Germany, or Sweden, it is too late.

    Even if they were to close the border completely, which they won’t, the threat of Islam rebellion, and the inherent nature of a violent religion and culture with the millions of young males now, and their own aging population, peace cannot be maintained.

    All they can do is delay the inevitable by, at most, 10 years.

    Next, they will let 4-8 family members per migrant into the country. This will hasten the 10 year period down to, perhaps 5.

    They will be faced with the massive deportation of humanity, echoing Nazi desire to remove Jews, or they will be forced to cede a portion of their land and grant it to a new “Islamic” country. This would be typical European “diplomacy” in action, and is similar to “creating a Palestinian state” in their own country, just as they try to coerce Israel to.

    Once established, the truth will emerge: the supremacist -victim dichotomy inherent in Islam will then show itself by attacking their “borders” for the need for more room and “their fair share.”

    They seek to impose the “tax” upon the Germans (or Swedes) and will turn their new european islamic nation into a third world nation because of their ideology’s practical outworking.

    “Ishmael is a wild man, and his hand is against every man.”

    Supremacy ideology is at war always, as any success “must” be as a result of fraud, even one Muslim to the other. They do not celebrate the successes of others.

    As this spreads, looking ahead, it will lead to war between two nations; the old Germany and the ceded Islamic sovereign “state”, which the Islamist will do what they have always done: seek allies.

    The end result is in death or slavery.

    They will look back to this period of time and mourn the importation of their own enemies.

    • Jon says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 5:30 pm

      The time to stop the wave of Islamisation that worries people is NOW while they’re still a minority in all of our countries. They have a burgeoning birthrate which will make them a majority in some countries within a couple of generations. Unless we want our grandchildren to be shanghaied into some horrific Islamic cult we must stop them NOW, or at least keep them within their own national enclaves. As it is, they’re flooding into Western countries while the Gulf states take none! In the meantime morons like Merkel and Prince Charles, along with various misguided church leaders are welcoming these people oblivious to the growing antipathy towards ‘refugee’ programs.

  21. simpleton says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 10:01 am

    Hear hear, Wellington, d, seth morgan. mortimer, Michael Warden

    Just google “prince charles praise islam” and it will show through the years of his support that way, and now to be of “faiths” so to ride the “interfaith” band wagon “to bring all UK religious leaders together to discuss the persecution of Christians by ISIS”.
    Is he following the ” European Society Coudenhove-Kalergi”
    that awarded Chancellor Angela Merkel the European Prize 2010. which she gladly accepted the award at the Federal Chancellery of Germany.

    Did Merkel think she was in line for a nobel peace prize? with that same philosophy as espoused by Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi

    The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

    So calling for that interfaith meeting is Prince Charles looking for awards too?

    • simpleton says

      Oct 11, 2015 at 10:02 am

      Part 2
      QE2 should be pointing out as Churchill did in Parliament of 12th November 1936 of the British Government’s lack of response to Germany’s reoccupying the Rhineland

      So they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful for impotency.

      and to think she has possibly been saying this every week to the recent PMs of Britain. Yeah right
      She even meet Churchill weekly at the beginning of her reign for about 3 years. 1952-1955 and lived through WW2 while he was PM.

      She makes speeches such as her Christmas Eve speeches which really obviously pushes the “diversity theme of peoples”, but is this where she stops when one sees for the past decade of immigration which certainly increased through the Tony Blair years and nor slowed even now. The result being more the push to a “ diversity of individual ” and the resulting change it has on her “own English laws” ! ! ! Freedom of Speech restricted by “Hate laws”.,People being arrested for even reading out passages from Winston Churchill book, even if later charges are dropped.
      I have tried posting this about 8 hours ago and then again bout 4 hours ago so I have stripped all links are out and will post in halves and then warning on the 2nd time it warned it was duplicate though it has not appeared.

  22. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 10:34 am

    British Government Terrorist Government
    — sign at a Moslem demostration in England

    Is this true? What acts of terror were committed by the British government? I know they have brought in millions of Moslems, which was a terrible inexcusable mistake, but that stupidity was not an act of terror, although many Englishmen are now growing terrified. Sure, the presence of Moslems in England and Scotland have indirectly resulted in Jihad murder operations, but those were committed by Moslem activists, not the British government. Is this sign saying that the welfare mooch benefits given to the Moslem activists means that the British government is complicit in the murder operations done by these welfare recipients?

  23. ecosse14 says

    Oct 11, 2015 at 11:10 am

    The Queen is irrelevant in England and even more so in Scotland. She is a mere figurehead who merely responds to whatever current PC fad is in vogue. Do not waste your time looking for a lead from her.
    Also if you not her Christmas speeches they only concern her fetermination to keep the Commonwealth together. As if anyone in Scotland England and Wales gives a flying f$#k about her commonwealth.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • OLD GUY on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • OLD GUY on UK: Woman converts to Islam, distributes Islamic State jihad terror videos
  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.