• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Muhammad Had “British Values”?

Nov 4, 2015 8:45 am By Robert Spencer

In FrontPage today I discuss a new attempt to sell more Islam in the schools in the UK — as the solution to “extremism,” of course.

Muslim family

How best to fight against the global jihad? The claim is increasingly common in the West that the best way is…more Islam.

“This is a golden opportunity,” wrote the Muslim activist Sajda Khan in the U.K.’s Independent, “to develop within our schools a curriculum based upon the biography of Prophet Muhammad, which clearly demonstrates and embeds what are now also considered British values. This is what will develop a strong sense of identity within our youth and dismantle the perverse understanding of Islam peddled by a few. We must be brave enough to say that being a British Muslim is not an oxymoron; it is the most natural thing in the world.

This is just the sort of thing the addled Leftists of the Independent eat up by the truckload. But let’s look into some of the British values that Islamic tradition holds Muhammad as having taught. All the statements below are from hadiths (reports of Muhammad’s words and deeds) accepted as reliable by Muslims, and recounting what are considered to be the words of Muhammad, or descriptions of his actions:

Women must cover everything but their face and hands: “‘O Asma, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this,’ and he pointed to her face and hands.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4092)

Child marriage: “The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).” (Sahih Bukhari 7.62.88)

Adulterers should be stoned to death: “There came to him (the Holy Prophet) a woman from Ghamid and said: Allah’s Messenger, I have committed adultery, so purify me….And she was put in a ditch up to her chest and he commanded people and they stoned her….” (Sahih Muslim 4206)

Those who leave Islam should be killed: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Sahih Bukhari 9.84.57)

Fight against unbelievers until they convert to Islam or submit to Muslim hegemony: “Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them…. If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.” (Sahih Muslim 4294)

Those who do not convert or submit to Islam are to be killed and their property plundered: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.” (Sahih Muslim 30)

Jews and Christians are accursed: “Allah cursed the Jews and the Christians, for they built the places of worship at the graves of their prophets.” (Sahih Bukhari 2.23.472)

Muslims can hasten the coming of the last days by killing Jews: “The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.” (Sahih Muslim 6985)

The value of terrorism: “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror…” (Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220)

It must be admitted, however, that in a larger sense, Sajda Khan is right: if these aren’t British values now, they will be soon enough – courtesy the appeasement and capitulation of the British ruling elites before the U.K.’s increasingly aggressive Muslim population.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, journalistic bias, United Kingdom, War is deceit Tagged With: muhammad, Sajda Khan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Marty says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 9:01 am

    This kind of treasonous garbage is what passes for journalism
    in what passes for the “left” in the UK.
    Islam has been our oldest enemy to survive unconquered, but
    until very recently this vile ideology had no place in UK soil.
    Yes, we bought slaves from the muslims, but they also kidnapped
    English & Irish slaves from the British Isles, so that doesn’t count as
    any sort of a decent relationship.
    We are simply being invaded discreetly, ie colonised, & the left
    plus the all powerful BBC etc think it’s great, as their people were
    taught at “uni” to hate the UK.
    100 years ago there was one mosque in England, & it was going to
    be demolished until an Indian lawyer got up a campaign.
    Today, more mohammedans go to mosques on Fridays, than Anglicans
    go to church on Sundays.
    One of the few good things about the EU is the presence of so many
    Poles, most of whom are Christians & swell the ranks of Catholic churches.

    • mortimer says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 10:20 am

      By colonizing the West with angry Muslims bent on hostile takeover, the Left is betraying their own countries in the name of internationalism…an unproved, unseen, Utopic la-la land.

      This forced colonization is the end of the West. Muslims all know it.

      • Raja says

        Nov 4, 2015 at 11:10 am

        Mortimer,

        Did you mean angry Muslims or hostile Muslims?

        • steve says

          Nov 4, 2015 at 1:41 pm

          Amuslim is a muslim, hence the oxymoron, Muslim chivslry…nuff said……

        • steve says

          Nov 4, 2015 at 1:43 pm

          A Muslim is a Muslim, hence the most profound oxymoron, Muslim chivalry…nuff said…

    • Lia Wissing says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 12:22 pm

      I can’t believe this sort of rubbish is spouted in the land where Henry II promulgated laws in the 12th century.

      • steve says

        Nov 4, 2015 at 2:47 pm

        Yes, notice you said the 12th century and that’s a long long long time ago and things have changed in the West. P*88lamists still adhere to the 7th century. NO comparison. You think they are nice go live with them but don’t forget to leave your brain at home!

    • Shane says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 4:35 pm

      The traitorous left has allied with Islam against Christianity and the West. It will take a civil war in Europe to defeat the Muslims and their allies. In America, we can simply end all Muslim immigration to defeat the jihad.

      • Paul says

        Nov 4, 2015 at 6:21 pm

        You’re absolutely right about Europe. If that’s what it will take
        then so be it. I don’t know about America. I just hope that they
        elect a genuine patriot next year. The alternative, Clinton, is
        just too catastrophic to contemplate.

      • TheBuffster says

        Nov 4, 2015 at 6:36 pm

        Ending Muslim immigration alone won’t do it. We have to make sure that the USA doesn’t enact laws that hamper freedom of speech, because the only way to keep the serious Muslims who are already there from fooling the American public into loosening immigration again and undermining our liberty in bits and pieces from within (not that our own people haven’t had a hand in already doing this over the decades) is to preserve the freedom to speak and write. The freedom to speak and write what is deemed “politically incorrect” must not be allowed even the slightest nick in its integrity.

      • medaber_emet says

        Nov 5, 2015 at 3:15 am

        Dear Shane
        Sorry to disappoint you
        Islam has so infiltrated America that the only way to stop them will also be a civil war
        and I would say very bloody one
        so wake up and smell the coffee

    • Christine Byrd says

      Nov 16, 2015 at 11:58 am

      Yes! Here in the US, our Muslime population is six percent, with the majority living twenty minutes from me in Dearbornistan! Look it up? They are sneaky and use benefits. I’m a public health nurse in the above mentioned city. Our Mexican population work harder than the Americans, yes they do, and their prophet is Jesus. They have no agenda but to enjoy freedom from violent gangs in their home countries. France just declared war on Syria. New will see what happens next.

  2. john spielman says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 9:23 am

    what British values are they talking about? unless it was the long since refuted revolting barbaric practice of hanging draw and quartering those condemned of treason. islam is a barbaric evil demon inspired fascist religion of death darkness and utter savagery which has NOTHING in common with Christ Jesus and real Christ followers which the majority of the British used to be in the 19, 20 th centuries

    • steve says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 4:11 pm

      The inbred religion of p*88 relies on the short attention spans of many Westerners to pull the wool over their starry stoned minds that as bad as they are still cannot compete with the morons of the moon god.

    • medaber_emet says

      Nov 5, 2015 at 3:27 am

      Steve you are so right about islam
      the problem is that you Christians are so lily ass
      the muslims will devour you like a lion preying a zebra calf
      war and blood is the main pillar of their culture and I really have mercy on the English people
      I want to tell you something
      the sooner the civil war will start the better chances that you English have to win this war against islam
      because the demographic changes are in their favor and if the war will start like in 20 years from now then you wont have a chance to win

      • Baucent says

        Nov 5, 2015 at 5:25 am

        And that may happen. But all is not lost, or in part recoverable. Take a look at the modern history of Lebanon. A Christian majority state in the 1920’s, to majority muslim population. A civil war did break out and was very messy, as civil wars are. Division of the country into sectors is the likely result and transmigration of ethnic populations.

  3. mortimer says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 10:17 am

    PHOTOSHOPPED MOHAMMED! Islam’s own source texts describe a figure who is extremely un-British.

    The Mohammed of the hadiths and the Sira (Mohammed’s official biography) is an amoral politician, cheating husband, pedophile, highway robber, enslaver, mafia godfather, conniving cult leader, plagiarist, sadist and megalomaniac. How are any of those British?

    The desire to remould or remake or photoshop the biography of Mohammed into something not found in Islamic source texts is doomed to failure.

    The real Mohammed of the oldest Islamic writings is the greatest liability to Islam, because he is antithetical to and incompatible with modernity. Mohammed is a Bronze Age Death Cult warrior.

    • john spielman says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 10:29 am

      he also was an enthusiastic drinker of CAMEL URINE

    • Marty says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 11:01 am

      “amoral politician, cheating husband, pedophile, highway robber, enslaver, mafia godfather, conniving cult leader, plagiarist, sadist and megalomaniac. ”
      You forgot blasphemer

  4. citycat says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 10:49 am

    A film about the prophet is a good idea.
    Based accurately on the koran story, like Jesus Christ Superstar for example.
    Then the truth of the Koran can be known by all.
    Would it be allowed i wonder.

    • Rita Durbin says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 11:28 am

      Probably would be allowed. However, the writers/producers/actors would need to carefully follow the Quran by providing direct quotes from it. Any deviation found, and no doubt, someone’s head would roll.

      • gravenimage says

        Nov 5, 2015 at 9:53 pm

        It would not help if it was completely accurate–if it were at all critical of Islam, Muslims would want to murder over it.

  5. More Ham Ed says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 10:52 am

    “the perverse understanding of Islam peddled by a few.”

    There was a secular poll taken a couple years ago by a left leaning pro-islam “research center” and even that poll resulted in a startling fact (when you add-up the populations based on given percentages) that upwards of 400 million muslims worldwide believe in the death penalty for leaving islam. In other words not a “tiny minority” ™.

    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/

  6. Peter Hyatt says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 10:55 am

    http://analysistomorrow.blogspot.com/2015/11/germanys-message-to-muslim-male.html

    What did Merkel tell the young Muslim males?

  7. Raja says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 11:07 am

    In spite of colonization the Brits had lots of good things to offer, a world class admin to name one of them. The colonial British shouldn’t have got into the business of spreading the Gospel, that should have been left to Christians.

    Why should the Islamic world be more offended or angry than anyone else? This seems to be just a crude method/streategy to milk the cow dead !!!! Those who don’t shout from rooftops don’t get any attention and are even forgotten like the rest of Asia, Africa etc. In essence what the Brits mean is that they are willing to make UK another gutter like those in middle east, Pakistan etc. This is another gross injustice and the British should just quit listening to every Tom Dick and Harry .

  8. Sam says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 11:16 am

    This is really rich now. Just like they say here Sharia is compatible with the US constitution. The worst part is people believe that even worse they don’t hear it. We are losing our freedom day by day. Faster each day.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 5, 2015 at 9:56 pm

      I was just going to mention that, Sam–constant Muslim claims that Islam is compatible with the free West is just grotesque.

      But, of course, it has a definite goal–to whitewash Islam in the eyes of hopeful Infidels, and lull them not to see Islam as a terrible danger until it is too late.

  9. jayell says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 11:50 am

    “…….“This is a golden opportunity,” wrote the Muslim activist Sajda Khan in the U.K.’s Independent, “to develop within our schools a curriculum based upon the biography of Prophet Muhammad, which clearly demonstrates and embeds what are now also considered British values…”

    So, WHICH biography of Mohammed. exactly? The little book by Ibn…what’s his face? can’t find my copy to check the name, but I’ve read most of it, it’s supposed to be the ‘authoritative’ version, and there’s NOTHING ‘Brfitish’ about it whatsoever!! Or might it be ‘The Truth about Muhammed’ by some strange person called Robert Spencer, which (I’ve got that one nere as I type) seems to have rather more words in it, seems to be based on a broader range of sources and one gets the impression reflects rather better scholarship. The ‘hero’ of the piece here does not seem to embody the ‘British’ values that I was brought up with.

    So is there some other biography that Sajda Khan is referring too? Maybe the one that has the bit where Mohammed come flying across from Mecca on his magic horse and lands at Camelot (they hadn’t built Heathrow then), and proceeds to instruct King Arthur how to put together a round table bought from IKEA, then get a few knights together and jolly well tell them how to do the business – except they never quite cottoned on to the raping and pillaging (dear oh dear, they probably lost marks over THAT). And of course he then magically transported himself forward in time a century or two in a new regeneration (Doctor Who style – yes, that’s all courtesy of Allah of course, along with the divine revelations and flying horses, and of course we all know that Dr. Who was always a Muslim) as an English Baron, who threatened to behead King John and rape the Queen and all her ladies-in-waiting unless he signed Magna Carta (which was all originally in Arabic but was mis-translated into Latin, which is the reason why all this ‘Democracy’ accidentally found its way in, but all that lot was left out of the history books when all those evil Christians got their hands on things and corrupted the whole issue – as usual.

    I continue the quote (if I can keep a straight face) – “This is what will develop a strong sense of identity within our youth and dismantle the perverse understanding of Islam peddled by a few”.. (no doubt the ‘few’ including someone called Mohammed and all his chums who were doing as he told them?)… .”We must be brave enough to say that being a British Muslim is not an oxymoron; it is the most natural thing in the world….” ‘Brave’ enough? ‘Stupid’ enough, ‘Ignorant’ enough, surely, and I don’t know about the ‘oxy’ bit, but it’s surely pretty ‘moronic’ to even THINK this twaddle, let alone peddle it, and not expect to get a few brickbats in return.

    What Mr Khan is demonstrating here is his amazing ignorance of the British people, British history and British culture. He is one of (unfortunately) quite a few million from the Empire/Commonwealth who currently inhabit the British Isles, whose physical and spiritual link with the place has been only relatively recent and certainly very supercficial and intended only for personal gain, rather like an employee of some remote commercially-acquired supply company who has been ‘promoted’ to the ‘parent company’ but has never bothered himself to notice that the ethos is totally different and instead insists on forcing his new colleagues to confrom to HIS modus operandi; and failing to realise that he is making himself quite ridiculous in the process.

    • mortimer says

      Nov 4, 2015 at 1:30 pm

      Agree. Sajda Khan has made a total fool of herself…again…by co-opting Britishness to mean ‘7th-century Arabian’. She also co-opted Jesus Christ (known in the New Testament as the ‘Son of God’, the ‘Lamb of God’, the ‘Word of God’, the ‘King of the Jews’, a ‘prophet of Israel’, ‘a Light to enlighten the Gentiles and the glory of his people Israel’) to become ‘Jesus of Nazareth, Prophet of Islam’ by another magical prestidigitation.

      Sajda Khan hasn’t any hesitancy or shyness at making huge claims, however, she certainly doesn’t feel a need to defend them, because, ultimately, Islam’s claims cannot be defended, but merely stated. Islam is based on legends invented by the caliphs over 100 years after the death of Mohammed. Any accurate biographical material cannot be ascertained. Islam is entirely based on blind faith in preposterous claims backed up by death threats and reinforced by endless, non-reflective repetition.

      Her general theme in all her articles is that Muslim barbarism is just fine, the 7th century is normative, no progress beyond it is possible, and anyone who criticizes Islamic stagnation is a bigot.

      While enjoying the liberalism and freedom of the West and freedom of expression, Sajda Khan is one of the world’s leading apologetics for women’s oppression and censorship.

      • jayell says

        Nov 5, 2015 at 7:56 am

        Hello Mortimer. Whoops! So Sajda Khan is female? Got that wrong didn’t I? (Hoe does one tell?) I must admit that I don’t recall any of her stuff before this piece de resistance, but this one was just too ridiculous for words. If I may quote you?…..”Her general theme in all her articles is that Muslim barbarism is just fine, the 7th century is normative, no progress beyond it is possible, and anyone who criticizes Islamic stagnation is a bigot.” In other words, we have here a person so blinded by her own islamically-induced, intellectually-myopic bigotry, that any other opinion is automatically dismissed as ‘bigotted’ because it does not fit her own cultural/relgious template. And that anything can be interpreted/distorted/corrupted to fit HER view?

  10. BC says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 11:58 am

    One should note the the reception to S Khan’s article in the comments section was uniformly hostile

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 5, 2015 at 9:57 pm

      Great to hear, BC. I think more people *are* waking up to the threat of Islam.

  11. h says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 12:13 pm

    Why would anyone want to be educated about a barbaric pedophile. We have plenty of them in prison in every state of the union. UK is gone and I am so sorry for our friends there. Farage for PM!!!

  12. b.c.terry says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 12:13 pm

    Ignorance is not only bliss, but apparently now it’s suicide as well.

  13. gary fouse says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 12:58 pm

    Now we know why Jihadi John is beheading people. It’s a British value.

  14. Angemon says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 1:50 pm

    All the statements below are from hadiths (reports of Muhammad’s words and deeds) accepted as reliable by Muslims, and recounting what are considered to be the words of Muhammad, or descriptions of his actions:

    This is exactly the sort of thing that got Mr. Spencer and Mrs. Geller banned from the UK – pointing out facts.

  15. steve says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 2:44 pm

    P*88lamism and more p*88lamism equals a whole lot of p*88lamism. The only thing you need is a urinal.

  16. f c king says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 3:01 pm

    British values ? Perhaps the values and actions of Briton during and shortly after the dark ages, in some matters. During expansion of the empire in the 15 and 1600s? During times when heretics to the church and witches were burned at the stake ? That’s about it, and that stopped a few hundred years ago.

    Islam is a disease.

  17. R Cole says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 4:57 pm

    No ‘compulsion to Islam’ eventually came to mean – the non-Muslims had to pay the jizya or be killed /fought against.

    ::

    We have been hearing these types of suggestions that Islam be taught in schools for years.

    There was the Left-wing fave integrated Muslim lawmaker in Holland – who suggested the same. But later asked that one Dutch city be rezoned to create a Muslim only area!

    ~ Well if he’s asking!!

    ::

    The Independent writer knows that it is his Islamic duty to bring Islam to the world. So he suggests turning British schools into madrassas – but with a diluted form of Islam – the highly acclaimed Christianized version – to set the stage to increase the depth and scope of what is taught later.

    Everything these Muslims say has an element of untruth.

    ::

    For many on the Left it’s ‘racist’ to question Islam ~ just take out ‘racism’ and put in ‘forbidden’.

    And so it is Muslims can tell them anything – and they feel compelled to believe it!

  18. Wellington says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 5:48 pm

    Mo no more had British values than did Adolf. One either knows this or should know it.

  19. Wellington says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 6:01 pm

    Had to make a second comment here and it is this: Islamic “values” are still very much in place, in Britain and all over the world. Would that British values still were because if they were, rather than by now being reduced to a shadow of their former self, the damn problem with Islam and Muslims in Britain wouldn’t have come to exist in the first place since traditional British values would have never exculpation, let alone acceptance, of Islamic “values” in the first place. The great tragedy here is the emasculation of British values by loads of fools.

  20. Islam :- the religion of our childrens future says

    Nov 4, 2015 at 9:18 pm

    “This is a golden opportunity,” wrote the Muslim activist Sajda Khan in the U.K.’s Independent, “to develop within our schools a curriculum based upon the biography of Prophet Muhammad ….

    , (kid logic) ,
    9 nine year old girl comes home from school, “mummy… I want to get married to mohamid like Aisha”

    , (kid logic) ,
    “Daddy… whats a pediofile, we learned today about a man mohamid, the older boys said he was a pediofile”

    , (kid logic) ,
    9 year old again, “Grandma, our teacher said we should burn down your church, and we should go to the funny church with the dome” ….

    , (kid logic) ,
    “Grandad, why do those people wear black hoods and their dressing gowns”

    , (kid logic) ,
    “Mummy, our teacher, the one that wears a funny hat said we have to bring a scarf tomorrow to put on our head”

    Note to parents :- The school curriculum has changed, our children will now be doing 2 days a week of religious study …….

    YOU GET THE GENERAL IDEA PEOPLE ……………………..

    The future of mankind is in our intelligence and in our children, why don’t we dumb them down and take away their freedom while they are easy to manipulate …

  21. Kasey says

    Nov 5, 2015 at 12:33 am

    What a grand exercise in taqiyya that propaganda is. Deceit to the nth degree!

  22. No Fear says

    Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 am

    To say that British values are similar to Mohammed’s values is simply a statement of intent to convert Britain to Islam. Nothing more. Mohammed and freedom have nothing in common, in the same way that the Mafia and freedom have nothing in common.

  23. Marty says

    Nov 5, 2015 at 4:44 am

    If any American readers doubt the level of servitude to islam the
    UK suffers, try this headline from today’s Daily Mail.

    “Father of three took his family to KFC for ‘treat night’ meal but staff
    refused to serve him the BBQ Bacon Boss Box deal because it is not halal”

    Within a tragically short period a once proud nation is reduced to this.
    Grovelling to Third World savages.
    Most state school meals are halal in our cities & one dinner lady was sacked
    for giving a mohammedan girl something not halal, even the girl specifically
    requested it.

  24. CERNYPES says

    Nov 5, 2015 at 9:23 am

    The correct word is “Mohammedans” not the generic, sanitized, vague word “Muslims”. Mohammedans are followers of Mohammed as evidenced by his behavior in the Hadiths (stories about Mohammed from eye witnesses who rode with him) and the Sira (biography of Mohammed). For a historical insight please google “Bill Warner Islam”. The core to understanding Islam can only be found in their sacred texts: the Koran, the Hadiths and the Sira. Islam should be judged by the behaviour of its founder, not by anecdotal stories of well-behaved Mohammedans in the West. Read. Investigate. Research. Educate yourself. And “No, Virginia” you do not need to understand ancient Arabic to understand Islam, anymore than you need to understand biblical Greek or Aramaic to understand the Bible. – CernyPes

  25. gravenimage says

    Nov 5, 2015 at 10:10 pm

    Evil Taqiyya artist Sajda Khan had this to say in her meretricious article:

    Many reading this will find it difficult to stomach, but the Prophet Mohammed had what we also call “British values”. Those values of social responsibility, respect for the rule of law, individual liberty, mutual respect, and tolerance of those of different faiths and beliefs that schools are now required to promote are not exclusively British, and are inherently Islamic…
    ………………………..

    You hear exactly the same bs about how the US Constitution is “Shari’ah compliant”.

    More:

    Sadly, the West has a history of reviling and caricaturing the Prophet of Islam. For centuries, it has failed to understand Mohammed and the universal principles he stood for. The historian and scholar W Montgomery Watt famously said: ‘Of all the world’s great men, none has been so much maligned as Mohammed.’ Perhaps this in part explains why so many young men and women have turned to misinterpretations of his teachings.
    ………………………..

    In other words, violence in the name of Islam is the fault of the “filthy Infidels”.

    And the vile Sajda Khan has claimed that anti-terrorism laws and any concern over security–in other words, any resistance to Jihad at all–“disenfranchises” Muslims.

    http://m.gulfnews.com/opinion/thinkers/will-the-muslim-vote-reshape-british-politics-1.1506394

    She is also calling for the Muslim vote to Islamize Britain here. Disturbing stuff.

  26. mortimer says

    Dec 1, 2015 at 11:12 am

    Depicting Mohammed as an English gentleman is hardly truthful…it is a horrible misrepresentation…disinformation. Mohammed encouraged lying. An English gentleman’s word is his honour…or he is no gentleman.

    Bukhari 3,49,857 Mohammed said: “A man who brings peace to the people by MAKING UP good words or by saying nice things, though untrue, does not lie.”

    When deception advances Islam, the deception is not a sin.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • jacksonl03 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • Yogi on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.