Don’t fight against jihad terror, it will only provoke jihad terror. Apparently the Islamic Human Rights Commission expects the British government to do nothing in the face of the jihad terror threat beyond demonizing and persecuting more foes of jihad terror — under the guise of combating “anti-Muslim hatred.” The cowering dhimmi government of David Cameron will no doubt oblige with alacrity.
The Islamic Human Rights Commission is a sinister Islamic supremacist group that had the towering gall and lack of simple decency to name the murdered Charlie Hebdo staff the “International Islamophobe of the Year.” Does anyone take this group seriously? In the shattered, staggering, appeasement-obsessed U.K., absolutely yes.
“Muslims ‘negatively affected’ by counter-terrorism policies, says report,” by Harry Farley, Christian Today, November 11, 2015:
British Muslims are negatively affected by government policies, especially those linked to security and extremism, a campaign group has said.
The Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) has been carrying out research into discrimination against Muslims for nearly two decades and found that more than 60 per cent of British Muslims felt politicians did not care about them, according to the BBC. The study questioned 1,782 people and included 50 in-depth interviews.
59 per cent of respondents said they believed their lives had been negatively affected by political policies. Additionally more than half said they were treated with suspicion by society.
“We have an environment now, where Muslim people feel they are suspected and where life is increasingly difficult,” said the report’s author, Arzu Merali.
“The impact of government policies, in particular those related with security, have really had an impact on silencing Muslims – not from a point of view of just talking about political issues, but even to report anti-Muslim hatred,” she added.
Most Muslims from all racial backgrounds experience some form of prejudice, according to the report. 40 per cent believed they had faced discrimination at work and 36 per cent said they had experienced discrimination in education.
One of the in-depth interviews was with a 19-year-old white Muslim convert whose college reported her under the government’s counter-extremism policy.
“I converted two weeks before Ramadan started and decided I was going to start wearing the hijab, so I let my college know I’d be fasting just to ease them into it,” she said.
“I guess that was enough for them to contact Prevent.
“Maybe they thought I was in [Islamic State] or running away to Syria, I don’t know what went through their mind.”…
IHRC, while criticising the government’s methods in tackling anti-extremism, have praised David Cameron’s announcement that anti-Muslim hatred would be recorded by police as a specific hate crime for the first time.
“What we really need is a cultural change, not just some laws here or there,” said Merali. “Unfortunately, we have institutional problems that need to be addressed.”
A Home Office spokesman insisted the government was committed to tackling “anti-Muslim hatred” and that counter-extremism policies such as Prevent were aimed at “protecting those who might be vulnerable to the poisonous and pernicious influence of radicalisation.”

Truthful says
All Conservatives (e.g. David Cameron, net worth >$40m) are oily turds.
Marty says
Sadly, not enough “negatively affected” by our suggesting that they obey our laws.
In fact, the nrgativity has resulted in them breeding still more & bringing
in more of their kind to destroy the UK.
Chabuco says
“Islamic Human Rights Commission”
>Islamic
>Human Rights
Pick one, you cannot have it both ways.
donnie says
Islamic human rights….not human rights..everyone else is excluded.
Jay Boo says
Do unto others
If Muslims insist to be treated in accord with Islamic principles then maybe they would be overjoyed if we were to threat them in the same manner as they treat non-Muslims in Muslim majority countries.
Charli Main says
Would it be Islamophobic and against the human rights of Muslims to offer them the same three choices they have been offering non Muslims for 1400 years ?????
1.Convert to another religion or no religion.
2. Live in Western countries as non citizens, without any political and social rights and pay a Muslim tax.
3. Be executed for refusing the above options.
What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander—–seems fair enough to me.
jayell says
What’s all this?
“British Muslims are negatively affected by government policies, especially those linked to security and extremism, a campaign group has said.”
“59 per cent of respondents said they believed their lives had been negatively affected by political policies. Additionally more than half said they were treated with suspicion by society.”
Now, there’s a funny thing! The whole of the UK, not to mention non-muslim World society, has been negatively affected by muslim attitudes and behaviour for a whole lot longer than recent government policies! For than a few people have even been blown to pieces or maimed, and thousands of girls in the UK have had their lives wrecked, and all because of the followers of the oh-so-perfect ‘Religion of Peace’. Now, why, I wonder, have we had all these ‘political policies’? Well, they’re NOT ‘political’ for a start, they’re simply measures to ensure the security and safety of all; that’s NOT ‘political’.
And if these people are so up their own lumbar tuberosities that they can’t see past their own demented little egos to understand the interests of others, then they really are beyond a joke. It is like the confirmed chronic alcoholic or compulsive kleptomaniac complaining that drink-driving laws or anti-theft devices/legislation are discrimatory and prejudicing their quality of life. Of course they are, because alcoholics in cars and kleptomaniacs prejudice everybody else’s quality of life – but that apparently doesn’t matter!
“Additionally more than half said they were treated with suspicion by society.” – Really? Now, given 9/11, 7/7 in London, the Sharm el Sheik Russian airliner catastrophe, plus all the other atrocities, near-atrocities and scandals around the world that have been tracked down to muslims, what the hell do these pathetically deluded morons expect?
And while we’re on the job; “Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC)”(!) What the devil is THIS? Yet ANOTHER posh-sounding, cobbled-together excuse for an ‘important’ organisation that’s supposed to impress the gullible kuffar? Who exactly ‘commissioned’ it? A few old superannuated idiots from some back street mosque, who had no doubt typically forgotten to shave and change out of their pyjamas? And who exactly paid for this (sic) ‘commission’? No-one of any official standing in the UK, that’s for sure! And what the hell do muslims know about ‘human rights’ beyond their own spolit-brat like unprincipled self-indugent exploitation and theft at the expense of everyone else? If this really is the best they can do, then their self-awareness really is pathologically deficient, they really DO need psychiatric intervention.
jayell says
And something else – “Additionally more than half said they were treated with suspicion by society.” Do they REALLY think that they ACTUALLY part of OUR society? I thought that they were making it very obvious that they don’t respect our values. So they clearly can’t be part of the club. Obvious! And they shouldn’t dare to presume otherwise.
Tim Baker says
What more can I say… you’ve said it all… without insults, (OK, just a few) with eloquence… just the truth…
I fully support your statements…
jayell says
Why, thank you, Tim! I was just a little annoyed when I wrote that lot and I could have got really rude, but Mr. Spencer would not like the tone of his website dragged down.
Warble Gloaming says
The British public are negatively affected by muslims in Britain.
Angemon says
So are the so-called “right wing” “extremists”. I wonder what would happen if they protested against it?
“Islamic human rights” as they are defined by the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Himan Rights in Islam, which states on articles 24 and 25, respectively, “all the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the islamic shari’ah” and “the islamic shari’ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration”?
? says
You would think Muslims would be more active in calling out the “extremists” and denouncing the oppression/mutilation and slavery of women and people in general. Unless I am missing something you think they would be the ones most active in rounding up these cancers and taking them out but apparently not. They don’t seem to care, and that’s really scary.
Larry A. Singleton says
Again; people should read the following. Before and after we defeated the Japanese we made our “Surrender Directive” crystal clear: “Surrender or Death-No Negotiation”. Too they were made to understand that they were a defeated enemy and every aspect of their lives was under direct military control and there would be no going over the heads of the military and complaining to Washington. (As the Palestinians are doing at the U.N.) We totally eliminated their state sponsored religious (Shinto) schools. They had absolutely no say in the curriculum. We even replaced those in our own government who disagreed with these policies. The government wrote articles, distributed “propaganda” posters and produced films telling the American people exactly how Japan and its people were being reeducated.
Not one soldier died in the occupation of Japan that followed the end of the war. There was no terror campaigns or insurgencies or “feel-good” movements for the “poor victimized” Japs.
Just like the Palestinians, Japanese were indoctrinated from birth and fed propaganda to embrace their death cult and “holy war”.
The ideas in this essay should be our road map in the war on terror.
“Gifts from Heaven”: The Meaning of the American Victory over Japan, 1945 by John David Lewis | Foreign Policy & Defense, History
https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2007-winter/american-victory-over-japan-1945/
Read this article for parallels on Afghanistan and Iraq and with how we’re fighting terrorism today. We are totally failing when it comes to identifying the enemy, stating our objectives and destroying our enemies. We should do with Islam the same as we did with the other state religion in Japan; Shinto. This was a policy of NO negotiation. Our policy was “surrender or die”. There status as a “defeated enemy and the democratic reforms were hammered into the heads of every man, woman and child in Japan. In addition to that they knew as well that their problems were a direct result of their hostile actions and militaristic ambitions.
Sayonara Shari’a: Japanese Lessons, Lost? By Andrew Bostom
islam :- the religion of idiots says
“negatively affected” by counter-terrorism
We don’t like the way you’re mean to us when we threaten & kill you …
If the mulims were so effected by this, why don’t they make some kind of reassurance program, why don’t the mullers stop preaching hate, why don’t they change sharia to stop trying to take over the world …
That would be a start ..
And with employment, of course they feel disadvantaged, why would anyone in his right mind employ somone that thinks it’s a right to steal from a infidel,, or handle food with their left hand, or wear muslim clothing at work,, or drive a truck that carries alcohol .. look what happened at Disney ..
The solution …….. ALL muslims should made to read Robert Spencers blog so they get the idea …
mortimer says
Islamic Human Rights Commission ? Surely, that’s humorous. It’s a perfect oxymoron.
Stevie says
Are you kidding about the Uk Government not caring enough for these slime balls ?
They cant bend over enough for them !!
tesa says
muslims don’t have to feel they are being treated differently,by changing their belief system and being more like ordinary brits,it’s that simple.the sudden drop in crime related to religous persecution should be jaw dropping,even david cameron would be surprised.