Last night I was on Hannity for the third time in less than a week, discussing Obama’s disastrous refugee policy, which is going to cause the deaths of Americans.
Last night I was on Hannity for the third time in less than a week, discussing Obama’s disastrous refugee policy, which is going to cause the deaths of Americans.
Treebird says
While the politicians play politics, what can the average person do, besides call congress, to make a difference in this matter? There are so many blind and deluded “do-gooders” who just think we oppose helping people and cannot see the threat.
Thank you for speaking out and doing what you do, I appreciate it VERY much!!!
Jay Boo says
Most of the Democrat Governors in the US are marching in lockstep .with Obama preferring to sacrifice the lives of those who elected them rather than to do the right thing.
Cold Warrior says
This is where and how you can “do something.”
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/14/coldwarrior-has-a-secret-and-dangerous-recon-mission-for-every-conservative-and-you-can-do-it/
Thank you.
Rita says
Does someone know please what happened to the blog “Winds of Jihad”? (Sheik Yermami)
gravenimage says
Yeah–I just checked the site, and I can’t access it. Sheik Yer’mami sometimes posts here–I hope he lets us know what’s up. Cyber attack?
Angemon says
It’s online here and now, GI. Next time check this site:
http://www.isup.me/
to see whether a site is online or if the problem is on your end.
KrazyKafir says
Once again Hannity shows he is the only true conservative personality, with guts, at Fox News. I do wish he would allow more time for the honest experts of Islamic culture to educate the audience with reality. But, then again, I suppose he has to tread carefully in a pc poisoned world.
revereridesagain says
Thanks also to Sean Hannity for recognizing that Spencer is one of the very best authorities on Islam and the jihad and giving his viewers the benefit of his knowledge and commitment to protect the innocent from Islamic jihadist violence.
As a taqiyya pusher, Rashid hits a new low when he tries to use the example of the “St. Louis” — a ship filled with Jewish refugees — in his attempt to “shame” us into welcoming murderous Islamic jihadists, for whom Jews will be top priority targets, into our midst.
John B says
I’m a huge fan of Robert Spencer. Just watched two Hannity interviews. As much as I despise the duplicitous Islamic apologists, he ( Hannity) really MUST let them make their point. He, during both recent interviews, cuts them off. He does himself no favours and denies us the chance to hear the ludicrous responses from Islamic supporters.
Barbara says
That is why I stopped watching Hannity. He ALWAYS cuts off those he doesn’t agree with and I just couldn’t take it any longer. I just started watching this video but had to turn it off. What is with him?
? says
I despise mainstream media but it was good to hear the truth on tv. Good work Mr. Spencer!
Now all there is to do is somehow eradicate the Muslim brownnosers and liberal tail kissers.
Ralph LaFong says
Sean is coming around, if slowly. He needs to drop the “radical” that prefixes almost every mention of Islam. Although “radical” means “from the root”, most people, including Sean, I’m sure, think it means “extreme” as in rare or not average. It’s just “Islam”.
I notice FOX has a new backdrop video they play with most every story on on the “European migrant crises”. It shows many women & children and even a child carrying a big stuffed animal. Oh so cute, so sad! (not). FOX doesn’t have to show this propaganda piece, but the choose to. Whose side are they really on?
Howard Pond says
Ralph, you are correct.
The non-Muslim uses Radical, in describing Muslims who are involved in Jihad. I suggest that rather than Radical, the word Fundamentalist is the correct term. The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines Radical as: “very new and different from what is traditional or ordinary.” Contrast this with the Cambridge Dictionaries’ Online definition for Fundamentalist, which reads: “The belief that the traditional principles of a religion or set of beliefs should be maintained.”
To understand these definitions, brings clarity to those mired in the question of:
“Are they peaceful or radicalized?”
By understanding these two terms, one realizes that framing the question with the words peaceful or radicalized not only asks the wrong question, but forms a question that makes no sense. How can we call a Muslim Radical if they are doing nothing that is “new or different” from the teachings of Muhammad? These terrorists are doing nothing Radical if they are following the fundamental Islamic teachings. If true believers of Islam are radicalized, this means they are doing something “new and different from the traditional or ordinary.”
David Guettler says
Harry Pond you have changed my way of looking at these terrorists. I will call them just like you do, ” Islamic fundamentalists”.It makes sense now!
Muhammad Bear says
I think the US should only take in a limited number of refugees. And those places should only go to those who can produce the best drawing of Muhammad in a compromising position.
Jeremiah says
Obama is trying to bring America down.
Jay Boo says
It is all about the (Film & Refugees)
Obama’s (Switcheroo) plan of selective indignation.
— Benghazi attack that killed Americans – Obama says, “What about that film?”
— Paris attack that murder hundreds including children in the name of Islam:
Obama switches to talking about the plight of Muslim refugees.
He calls politician who oppose his insanity shameless.
He acts as if those who died have no value.
The list is endless
Whenever Muslims show us their ass Obama is first in line ready to kiss it and scolds those who refuse to follow his disgraceful behavior.
Sam says
He already has brought America down
With the help of liberal brainwashed poeple and disgustingly dishonest media electing him twice.
Jay Boo says
You commenters are so Islamophobic.
Don’t you realize that all of the refugees will be vetted by “the most stringent standards in the world”?
Don’t you folks listen to NPR?
— Well ok, admittedly there is no reliable documentation in war torn Syria and we can’t trust officials who are trying to survive the chaos of war or can we trust neighboring Turkey while it is busy printing box loads of fake passports..
— Then there was that unfortunate incident with Boston Marathon bombers (REFUGEES) Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother. The Russians told us flat out what was going on but the Obama regime said (“Don’t worry we got this”) ever careful not to offend the sensitivity of Muslims.
RonaldB says
” The Russians told us flat out what was going on…”
That’s not quite true, Jay.
The Russians told the FBI that the Tsarnaevs were Islamic extremists and likely terrorists, but they gave the FBI no details. The FBI was complaining about that…that the Russians left the FBI to do the actual work. The FBI declined to have a real investigation, but pointed out they weren’t given enough information by the Russians.
I’ll bet the FBI does very well when the casework is done and dropped into their laps.
Gleaner1 says
With a POTUS like you guys have, if some of you haven’t seen what Merkel is doing to the EU and the native European people in the name of “Diversity”, you might like to view this, YT took it down it was so good,
Just google, Live Leaks The forced collective suicide of European Nations.
Out of all first world countries, the only three not doing this are Japan China and Russia.
Agent of Liberty says
As The Rush pointed out today.
A provision in the immigration and naturalization Act. States “In general any immigration who has been a member of or affiliate with the communist party or other totalitarian party (islam) or subdivision or affiliate there of domestic or foreign is inadmissible.
There we go! Islam is absolutely totalitarian making it illegal in America.
By by muslims!
Muhammad Bear says
The only problem with that is that Islam is also a religion which, in Obama’s eyes, is deserving of all of the protections conferred by the First Amendment.
eduardo odraude says
The First Amendment does not protect just anything a religion might want to do, of course. Mormons were forced to give up polygamy, for example. There is a line in the law between doing things and arguing for them, and between arguing for peaceful achievement of totalitarianism, and arguing for violent achievement of totalitarianism. As long as it does not directly propose illegal violence, advocacy for totalitarianism seems in general to be legal, at least for citizens. U.S. sedition laws apply only when planned violence is involved. The law leaves a huge amount of wiggle room for people to indirectly advocate jihad. Islam has to be contained somehow, because it makes religious and intellectual freedom more and more impossible the greater the percentage of Muslims in a nation — yet it has to be contained without in the process doing serious damage to freedom. I think the only way most people are going to learn about Islam is by means of disasters. You can point out Islamic core texts, polls of Muslims, and human rights conditions in Muslim nations till you are blue in the face, and people still refuse to see. They will only see when there is a large enough horror perpetrated in their own world.
eduardo odraude says
Did Limbaugh say Islam is totalitarian?
Walter Sieruk says
America should be able to learn from the polices of folly of the countries of Europe in allowing so many Muslims immigrants to enter into their countries. Just look that the sad and tragic outcome of the foolish policy did to France. As in that last Friday jihad massacres in Paris. Moreover, the earlier jihad shooting,this year, in and out of the Paris that was connected with that French magazine Further that other French city just a few years ago the with a Muslim who in the jihad had even murdered a little girl. To reiterate , America should learn from the folly of other countries. What ‘s more the American people and the American politicians to need to learn the the foolish polices of other nations.
Walter Sieruk says
Other reasons ,then those just given about why America should not let in So many Muslim immigrants is again the example of what happened to France. With that nation being plagued with Islamic riots with goes along with car burning and also ,rapes plus the vicious and brutal actions of “honor killings” and the least but not to be overlooked is the higher welfare cost to the people of France. In conclusion, there is no logical reason to allow so many Muslims to enter into the United States.
Westman says
I’m feeling upbeat. I think America will be saved from Islamic domination by the example of Europe. Please accept my deepest sympathy for Europe, especially those regions now suffering. European lives matter.
1. America will see the results of mass migration to Europe before it’s too late. We have time to become educated.
2. America still has a significant birthrate which, unfortunately, is declining. Currently, the void is being filled by Hispanics who really want to be Americans.
Champ ✿ says
Robert Spencer stated *exactly* what the problem is that Americans face, courtesy islam & company and the Syrian refugees, coming into our country! Bravo!
sahani says
Show me nation where muslims are in peace.
sahani says
Why muslim countries are not accepting any muslim refugees .
sheik yer'mamih says
Funny how these Islamo-spokesturds always use their 30 seconds on TV to proselytise for Islam.
John Johness says
Mr Spenser your succinct exact sentences contrast strongly with the confusion of Rachid. By keeping out, not interrupting his rambling you have shown dignity
“For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”
Many of these high level Muslims only have to speak to be condemned from their own mouths. They have moral hubris as they think they know the “whole truth”.
That is what we need to use against them..
More Ham Ed says
1:58 “we should help refugees” (yet none of the 12 RICH islamic countries are taking in 20,000 “refugees”).
2:21 “risking American ‘dignity'” THAT’S NOT WHAT I ASKED YOU.
2:40 (just talk agressively over the host, something Robert does not do).
2:49 “Out of fear” (if you disagree it must be because of ‘fear’ – same line from leftists).
2:59 talk over the host.
gravenimage says
Actually, this was one of the best Hannity segments I have seen–Sean didn’t engage in his usual hedging. Robert Spencer was sharp and to the point as always.
More disgusting whitewash and apologia for Islam from the Ahmidiyya–despite their being threatened and murdered by orthodox Muslims. Luckily, Hannity challenged him on his bs. Great show!
Cecilia Ellis says
And not once did Hannity say “radical Islam.” Robert must be getting through to him. Agree . . . Though brief, it was excellent.
Pig Jizya says
The muslim talked about the Jewish refugees in WW2.
Might I remind him that there were ZERO Jewish terrorists.
Tommo says
State Governors should decline to accept Syrian immigrants like so many have already done. If they are forced to take large numbers by an executive order then only a temporary residence permit should be issued so that they can be deported after Obama has gone from office in 2017..
http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time%20left%20until%20Obama%20leaves%20office%22
Jeremiah says
When are we going to get serious?
We can prevent further attacks by raiding mosques, jailing Imams and identifying those who teach the Koran. Then we don’t need to respond, we don’t need to fight it and we don’t need to defeat it. There is no reason for people to continue to live in fear except for Political Correctness. There is no need to fight all muslims, only those who object to the closure of mosques. There is no need to kill on a large scale, only those who are willing to defend Islam. It is Islam and its teaching which is our enemy! All this talk about trying to find terrorists is nonsense. All this fear is misplaced. Only Political Correctness can kill us. No need to “flag” anybody on a terror watch list. Bring them all in for questioning. Just close the mosques! The mosques contain the terror entire network that we are looking for. No terror network exists outside the mosques, so why are we avoiding mosques? Do we have to ask Obama?