• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hillary won’t say “radical Islam”: “Sounds like we are declaring war against a religion”

Dec 6, 2015 8:36 pm By Robert Spencer

This just sidesteps the need to understand and counter the enemy’s ideology. Whatever it may “sound like” to call the enemy by the right name, it is a prerequisite to understanding and defeating it.

hillary-clinton4

“Clinton explains why she won’t say ‘radical Islam,'” by Eric Bradner, CNN, December 6, 2015:

Washington (CNN)Hillary Clinton explained on Sunday that she won’t use the term “radical Islam” because it “sounds like we are declaring war against a religion.”

“It doesn’t do justice to the vast number of Muslims in our country and around the world who are peaceful people,” Clinton said in an appearance on ABC’s “This Week.”

“No. 2, it helps to create this clash of civilizations that is actually a recruiting tool for ISIS and other radical jihadists who use this as a way of saying, ‘We are in a war against the West — you must join us,'” she said.

Clinton has faced criticism in recent weeks for — like President Barack Obama and other Democratic candidates — refusing to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism” in the wake of ISIS attacks like the shootings in Paris.

Republican presidential candidates have argued it’s important to denounce, but Democrats, including President Barack Obama, have sought to resist linking the religion to jihadist attacks.

“They won’t say radical Islamic jihadist,” said New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “Now when you say radical Islamic jihadist, they understand, the rest of the Muslim community understands. The folks who are peaceful and who attend mosques in a peaceful way, work in our country, raise their families, pay their taxes. They know they’re not radical Islamic jihadists.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: Hillary Clinton


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Don McKellar says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 8:41 pm

    No matter what you do, or how you feel about whomever ends up the GOP candidate, you MUST get out and vote against Hillary.

    • Amber says

      Dec 6, 2015 at 9:18 pm

      I agree we all must vote, for better or for worse we all must vote. We need to let our next president know that we want to be heard and they are there to serve us, the people of united states. We need to voice our opinion.

      • Shane says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 10:50 am

        We cannot let this ruthless left wing jerk become our nest President. She will be no better than Obama in fighting Islamic jihad. Vote for the Republican candidate of your choice in the primaries, and vote for the GOP candidate in the general election, even if it is a guy you don’t like.

    • Saleem Smith says

      Dec 6, 2015 at 9:18 pm

      Her statement is no more idiotic than parts of Obama speech earlier tonight.

      I am an ex-Muslim living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy.

      In his speech Obama said that we should “not be suspicious of Islamic organizations.” With this statement Obama has shown himself to be treacherous snake – as no one could possibly be this f**king stupid. Speaking as an ex-Muslim I know to NEVER trust a Muslims’ loyalty to anything other than Islam. Muslims believe in a horrible lie which forces them to promote and protect this lie. And a “proper interpretation of Islam” is even more malevolent than one could possibly imagine their worst nightmares. The Quran and Muhammad’s Sunnah are filled with all manner of evil.

      Islam is no “religion of peace.” Islam is primarily a religion of “injustice, intolerance, hatred, and violence.” The fact is, if we non-Muslims were to say about Muslims what the Qur’an says about us, we would be arrested for hate speech. The Qur’an largely preaches discrimination, death, and imposition of its dogma on everyone. Certainly some Muslims will be offended by such statements, but frankly, so what? Judaism and Christianity, the world’s two other major monotheistic religions, have had to face the harshest of scrutiny and criticism for several hundred years which continues to this day. Islam must not be granted any special privileges or be exempt from such treatment – the implications are of tremendous importance.

      Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

      “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

      The statement continues,

      Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

      • jihad3tracker says

        Dec 6, 2015 at 10:40 pm

        As I wrote in another post tonight, thank you for the excellent context and truth contributed, written by a person who went through the pathology of Islam on a day to day basis.

        Hillary is in full desperation mode — the legacy of Hussein Obama’s transparent love for Islam. The weekend is closing and so our readers at JW might have a few minutes to jot them down links to superb websites:

        www [dot] inquiryintoislam [dot] com / www [dot] citizenwarrior [dot] com / www [dot] thereligionofpeace [dot] com / www [dot] barenakedislam [dot] com

        Videos by a counter-jihad resource are at www [dot] answeringmuslims [dot] com. Search Youtube for “The Jihad Triangle” / “Three Stages of Jihad” / “Taqiyya”.

      • Bamaguje says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 6:36 am

        She doesn’t seem to understand that Islam has declared war (Jihad) on we infidels.
        We have no choice but to fight back and unapologetically crush it.
        It’s self defense. We infidels are not the aggressors… JIhadis are.

      • Shane says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 10:52 am

        Thanks, keep spreading your message to the clueless Americans and Europeans who think that Islam is no worse than any other religion. I am all for bringing in non-Muslim refugees and immigrants, but it is just foolish to bring in a lot of Muslims into any Western country.

  2. john spielman says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 8:43 pm

    So hillary, does it matter if islam has declared WAR ON US?

    • mortimer says

      Dec 7, 2015 at 1:03 am

      john spielman has the point here: Islam is per se a doctrine of warfare against disbelievers. This is foundational Islam, rather than an invention of later theorists.

      Mohammed’s Islam is JIHAD. We cannot convince Muslims that jihad IS NOT ISLAM, because JIHAD IS ISLAM.

      Instead, we must deprogram Muslims out of Islam.

      • john spielman says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 8:03 am

        YES DEPROGRAM OR DEPORT

  3. Diane Harvey says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 8:48 pm

    “because it ‘sounds like we are declaring war against a religion.’”

    Ahh, Mrs Clueless, that “religion”* declared war against the rest of us many moons ago.

    *Islam is a RINO – a religion in name only. A political system masquerading as a religion.

    • Jura says

      Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 am

      It declared war against the world 14 centuries ago.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Dec 7, 2015 at 4:03 am

      “We are at war with jihadists …..
      We are at war with people who use their religion for purposes of power and oppression…..”
      Hillary Clinton
      http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/11/18/as-democrat-presidential-candidates-defend-islam-donald-trump-lays-out-strategy-for-defeating-isis
      Not much wriggle room left, Mrs. C.

      • Michael Copeland says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 4:27 am

        Jihadists. Hindu? Catholic? Wesleyan? Atheist?
        No. Muslim only.
        “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims” and is “a communal obligation”
        (Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0, o9.1).
        “Islam will dominate” is how, on placards, they express their duty.
        Yes, it is about “purposes of power”.

  4. Baucent says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 8:58 pm

    Hillary is wrong on both points. Using a term like “radical Islam” does not at all sound like “we are declaring war on a religion”. What it does is it highlights that there is a difference. There are muslims in two camps, some who are peaceful and others who are at war with the West.
    No.2 “it helps creates a clash of civilizations”. wrong again, a very weak argument as it is patently obvious that the “war of civilizations” has been going on in earnest since 9/11 and actually centuries before.

    All this makes it very clear that the Democrat anointed candidate is lost in PC land and one more homeland terror attack in the next 12 months will probably sink her chances of the presidency.

    • worldcitizen1919 says

      Dec 6, 2015 at 10:47 pm

      I think all that matters is people don’t get confused with the two camps. Once the name Islam is mentioned do people have enough discernment to know it doesn’t include all Islam? Or will they generalise and blame all Muslims and hate and sicriminate against all Muslims? That is the danger.

      And the term radical Islam is it correct because Islam is not radical but there are religious fanatics so I feel fanatics or extremists is more appropriate because they don’t truly represent Islam whode purpose was to civilise a barbaric tribe not threaten humanity with terrorism.

      • somehistory says

        Dec 6, 2015 at 11:18 pm

        “I think all that matters…”

        *********************************
        It is important that you *think* some more.
        Read more of what Mr. Spencer, Ms.Geller, Mr. Ibrahim, Mr. Greenfield have written on the subject and you might just come away with a different point of view.

      • Jack Diamond says

        Dec 6, 2015 at 11:23 pm

        Islam hates and discriminates against disbelievers. This is not an opinion it is Qur’anic doctrine. Loyalty & Enmity. Islam declared war on non-Muslim mankind simply on the basis of their religious beliefs and their acceptance or rejection of Allah & Muhammad as his Messenger. Not on anything they did to Muslims. Read sura 9:5 and sura 9:29 and tell us how Islam is not “radical” when it calls for killing (the correct term is slaughter, massacre) disbelievers unless they either convert, live as subjugated people under Islamic authority–and feel themselves “humbled” i.e. humiliated as befitting their disgrace– or face the sword? All Muhammad and then his successors did was threaten other tribes and nations with just those three choices–and no others. Why did the Islamic armies leave Arabia in the first place except to conquer the world for Allah? In the face of those rivers of blood and mountains of corpses and lives of misery and suffering Islam subjected millions of people to, you dare pretend it was the opposite. You dare pretend today’s “fanatics”–who are but pious Muslims emulating Muhammad and the Best of Muslims–do not represent true Islam. Go convince your brethren, don’t waste your breath on infidels. You are not the victims here.

        • Jay Boo says

          Dec 6, 2015 at 11:46 pm

          David Wood (and perhaps others) said something to the effect that conflict with Islam did not begin with the Crusades; it began with surah 9:29

      • Jura says

        Dec 7, 2015 at 3:04 am

        Well, as far as I know, at least in sunni islam ALL schools of islamic jurisprudence insist on literal meaning of Quran.
        Whne taken literaly, Quran is prefect war, genocide, tyran, misogyn, deception, enslavement, rape, pedophilia manual.

        • Michael Copeland says

          Dec 7, 2015 at 3:53 am

          An Iranian suggested the story of Jonah be taken figuratively:
          he was executed.
          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/10/iran-executes-man-for-interpreting-quranic-story-as-symbolic-tale

  5. Jack Diamond says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 9:33 pm

    So using the term “radical Islam” is going to drive otherwise peaceful Muslims to have to murder us?
    Let’s see, she won’t say radical Islam but she will say radical jihadists…as opposed to middle of the road jihadists, like her girlfriend Huma…I thought dignifying them as “jihadists”was a recruiting tool as well, or does Hill not know what religion Jihad is a doctrine of? Meanwhile tough guy Chris Christy will say radical Islamic jihadist anytime he wants, but only after indicating that 99.9% of Muslims believe nothing in common with R.I.J’s–because the Muslim Brotherhood tells him so. What a farce. What a face.

    • Jack Diamond says

      Dec 6, 2015 at 10:48 pm

      “sounds like we are declaring war against a religion” –yep. In fact, “radical” Islam turns out to be just plain ol’ Islam. It’s a religious war we’re in and it was declared in the 7th century and it doesn’t care what you decide to call it. As my fortune cookie said today “where there’s no vision, the people perish.”

      • PRCS says

        Dec 6, 2015 at 11:10 pm

        “In fact, “radical” Islam turns out to be just plain ol’ Islam”

        That is correct.

        • Pig Jizya says

          Dec 7, 2015 at 3:44 am

          Exactly right. Islam at its core and practiced most fundamentally is expressed by what ISIS does. That is why what Clinton and Obama are saying is so dangerous. They are pretending that at its core it is peaceful. But if the were the case then the more “devout” a Muslim got the safer he would become. What we see is the exact opposite.

          Pretending Islam is peaceful at its core is exactly what is meant by not properly defining the enemy and is in fact defining the enemy in an opposite manner from what it is.

          That is why if we continue down this “Islam is peace” “ISIS is not Islamic” road, our Western civilization will be defeated, and why Obama and Clinton are traitors.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 7, 2015 at 7:35 am

          Bill O’Reilly–and others–have the concept of “good” Muslims completely backward.

          He opined the other day about “good” Muslims rejecting violence–or some such.

          In truth:

          Islamists are “good” Muslims.

          Violent jihadists are “good” Muslims.

          “Bad” Muslims are like Catholics who use artificial birth control methods in that both ignore various tenets/teachings of their respective religions.

      • PRCS says

        Dec 6, 2015 at 11:13 pm

        One must wonder if politicians, “journalists” and others who parrot the term “radical” Islam would ever say “radical” Nazism, or “radical” communism.

        • Jack Diamond says

          Dec 6, 2015 at 11:56 pm

          They were always contrasting “hard line” communists or “Stalinists” with perceived “liberal” or moderate factions we could work with…If Nazism had survived something similar might have occurred. Naturally this mindset gets applied to Islam, something far more alien than they can begin to think. Coupled with their perceived duty protecting the 99% of what they think of as innocent, harmless, peaceful Muslims from being tainted… with the truth.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 7, 2015 at 7:46 am

          That is a good point about “hard line/Stalinist” communists vs the perception of the time that “liberal” factions could be worked with.

          I do believe the “radical Nazism/communism” question should be asked today–however–as it does put the current crop of politicians and journalists on the spot re: “radical Islam”.

  6. Jay Boo says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 9:40 pm

    If Huma would stop humming in her ear or ‘wherever’ as Trump would say, she might be able to break free of her hijab friend fetish just long enough to unscramble her brains.

  7. gravenimage says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 9:43 pm

    Hillary won’t say “radical Islam”: “Sounds like we are declaring war against a religion”
    ……………………

    What if that religion has declared war against *us*?

    Even saying “radical Islam” is too close to the truth for Hilary.

  8. somehistory says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 10:37 pm

    What about this is any different than war in the past?

    Re: the country that sent planes against Pearl Harbor “An infant Emperor Meiji was adopted as the new order’s figurehead and self-justification. Japan’s new regime re-emphasized the role of the Emperor as a living God, making it the heart of an ideological indoctrination taught in the new state school education system. The Japanese Army took this further by the simultaneous incorporation of Bushido (the military scholar code) into its military programs. Thus the overthrow of the Shogun was portrayed less as a revolution and was characterized instead as the Meiji Restoration, a title that gave moral justification to a successful armed insurrection. – See more at: http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/159910#sthash.alZukHrW.dpuf

    Hirohito behaved as a constitutional monarch, the Meiji Constitution granted him absolute power – he was after all enshrined as a God. On three separate occasions during his rule he had demonstrated his absolute powers; in 1929 he forced the resignation of his prime minister; in 1936 he overruled his military advisors to insist on the harshest treatment of the young officers involved in the coup d’etat known as the 26 February Incident in 1945; and finally in August 1945 he overruled his advisors by insisting on a Japanese surrender. Hirohito had the power to stop Japan’s military adventurism in the 1930s but chose not to. As his former aide-de-camp Vice-Admiral Noboru Hirata conjectured, “What [his majesty] did at the end of the war, we might have had him do at the start.” – See more at: http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/159910#sthash.alZukHrW.dpuf

    And what about the earlier days when moslims were pirating ships belonging to early America? It was recognized in those days that islam is as much political and barbarous as it claims to be religious.

    hillary clinton is a fool and a liar. Is there a good bone in her body? Probably not. One day soon, it will no longer matter what she says or what she thinks.

  9. leninandmccarthy says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 10:39 pm

    If Queen Hillary wins, America just signed a death warrant for its demise.

  10. Lenin-McCarthy says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 10:41 pm

    Obviously she want to appeal to muslim voters. I hope Trump wins.

  11. Threadkiller says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 10:42 pm

    They’re not radical muslims, they’re faithful muslims. They’re not radicalized, they’re converted.

  12. Myxlplik says

    Dec 6, 2015 at 11:33 pm

    So this is what it looks like when an Ostrich doubles down.

  13. mortimer says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 12:43 am

    Recent opinion surveys show that as many as 287 MILLION MUSLIMS sympathize with ISIS.

    Why do they think ISIS is Islamic, when Islam scholar HILLARY ‘knows’ ISIS is un-Islamic?

    No…wait a minit…HILLARY isn’t an ‘Islam scholar’ is she? No, she’s a fraud, isn’t she!

    HILLLARY never read anything Islamic…not the Sira, not the hadiths, not the Koran. She’s GUESSING about Islam, isn’t she…not having the slightest idea what is in those books.

    Why does anyone listen to FRAUDULENT HILLARY about Islam? She’s lying about it, isn’t she?

  14. mortimer says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 12:55 am

    To Hillary, I recommend these comments (I hope someone who knows her will relay them):

    “Islamism is not a caricature, nor a counterfeit, nor a heresy, nor a fringe or atypical phenomenon versus classical, orthodox, Sunnite Islam.

    To the contrary, I think Islamism is naked Islam, Islam without a mask and without paint, Islam perfectly consistent and true to itself, an Islam that has the courage and lucidity to go all the way to its ultimate conclusions and final implications.

    Islamism is Islam in all its logic and in all its rigour. Islamism is present in Islam as the chick is present in the egg, as the fruit is present in the flower and as the tree is present in the seed.

    But what is Islamism?

    Islamism is political Islam, the bearer of a project for a model society and whose aim is to establish a theocratic state based on Sharia, the only legitimate law—since it is divine—since it was revealed and enshrined in the Koran and Sunna—it’s a law that applies to everything.

    Here is an all-inclusive and all-encompassing project, one that is total, totalizing and totalitarian.”

    -Father Henri Boulad, SJ, of Alexandria, Egypt

    • PRCS says

      Dec 7, 2015 at 8:04 am

      Father Boulad’s comments are spot on; except for that nonsense about a nonexistent “political” Islam.

      Surely he knows there’s no separation of mosque and state.

  15. Westman says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 2:08 am

    Shhhhh. Don’t say “Radical Christians” because it will sound like we are declaring a war against a religion.

    When you meet Jim Jones, David Koresh, or Warren Jeffs give them a hug for Hillary.

  16. ? says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 2:08 am

    And she’s the leading democratic candidate? All hope is lost.

  17. duh_swami says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 4:03 am

    ‘Radical’ Islam does not exist…Islam only has one name, not two…Could someone tall me where I can get a copy of the ‘perverted version ‘ of Islam so I can compare it to the non perverted version?
    If these lying cretins don’t turn your stomach it is made of cast iron…How long do we have to suffer the rule of fools and traitors?

    Please don’t tell :Loretta the Lyncher’ I wrote that…

  18. Lloyd Miller says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 5:41 am

    What Hilary and Barack say is limited, if not determined, by their Saudi sponsors. Same for many RINOs. When does Jihad Watch start disseminating THIS truth!?

  19. abad says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 7:17 am

    Judging by that expression on Hillary’s face, she is a closet Muslim

    LOL

  20. Soloview says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 10:44 am

    The naive animals on George Orwell’s Farm, asked if “rats were comrades”. No-brainer for Hillary: ” yes, they are !” (They are nice and cuddly and can be domesticatwed !)

  21. Angemon says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 12:45 pm

    From the horse’s mouth – she doesn’t want to associate the “peaceful” muslims with the alleged ideology they’re not following, hence why she won’t name the ideology they’re not following. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go bang my head against the wall to see if I can make some sense of her “logic”.

  22. Islofob IS-1 says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 2:00 pm

    How can a “follower of islam”, not follow the faith they claim as theirs?

    Is that not like a claimed Christian, stating that Jesus is NOT the son of God?

    If the follow islam, the threat is carried with them, a time bomb in waiting, and a unknown timer.

    The call should be for a complete rejection of the “faith” of islam here in the west, not labeled as a War on islam, or calling these attackers just terrorists.

    they follow islam, as it is quite clear.

  23. More Ham Ed says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 3:27 pm

    Liberals believe they can solve all the world’s problems with mere words and by redefining the dictionary. It’s like the ostrich which puts it’s head in a sand hole. Liberalism is all about pretending and imagining (imagine all the people…) and it’s not reality. It stems from 50+ years of leftist professors placed in 90% of all levels of learning institutions post-1960. Those kids are now adults trying to pretend to solve problems. It has to get bad enough for a majority of society to not tolerate it anymore.

  24. The Obama Timeline author says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 4:09 pm

    Rodham’s excuse is absurd. It is like refusing to use the term “flat tire” because it does a disservice to all tires.

  25. mach37 says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    Yes, this is repeating what many others have written, above, but it needs repeating. Islam is, for all practical purposes, at war with all other religions, and with people with no religion. Islam will not abide with any other religion except in a superior capacity (subduing all other religions), or killing the members of other religions who refuse to be subdued. This is all in the Koran, and reinforced in the Hadiths.

    Any and all Muslims who do not believe in this are “hypocrites” (Islamic definition of hypocrite), that is, apostates, who must be killed. Any Muslim who objects to this belief is not a true Muslim; that is, there are no True Muslims who are “peaceful” and willing to let non-Muslims continue to exist.

    The solution for achieving world peace is to wipe out Islam totally; otherwise the world will never see peace as long as there is a living follower of Islam. Harsh, but necessary for world peace.

  26. citycat says

    Dec 7, 2015 at 9:11 pm

    She’s an embarrassment to intelligent women,
    religion is radical by definition, the basic roots of nonsense of religion is the basic roots, without which there would be no religion, and mankind could evolve.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • janicevanguilder on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Yogi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.