In this special new edition of The Glazov Gang, I was joined by Robert Spencer, the Director of JihadWatch.org and the author of the new book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS.
Robert came on the show to discuss To Flood America With Muslim Refugees, unveiling the meaning of the Islamic State threatening to flood Europe with 500,000 refugees in February, 2015.
Don’t miss it!
The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program. Please donate through our Pay Pal account or our Indiegogo campaign. Also subscribe to our YouTube Channel and LIKE us on Facebook.
KnowThyEnemy says
Sharing an interesting post that l just came across online –
(Link: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/off-topic/53275-islam-law-prohibited-us-immigration.html )
Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.
The law prohibits entry of “Aliens who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States.” It also prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the US or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited. It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.
In fact, there are many verses in the Koran that command Islamists to kill those who do not submit to allah and the prophet. If Congress so desired to hold the White House accountable to the current immigration of refugees (which also must comply with the law), it has the Immigration and Nationality Act to cite. The Administration is breaking that law. The question is “does Congress have the political will to do something about it?” Or shall we be a nation like that in Isaiah 59:14 where, ” justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.” I think you know the answer, at least for now. But there are a handful of Congressmen who are studying this. Pray.
To read the law, go to this link and scroll down to Chapter 2, Section 212:
http://www.usacarry.com/forums/redirect-to/?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gpo.gov%2Ffdsys%2Fpkg%2FSTATUTE-66%2Fpdf%2FSTATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf
(This information is on page 185 of the document).
Bradley Lexvold says
Thanks for posting this. I was about to, but you did a more thorough job than I would have. Brad
Bradley Lexvold says
I see you ended this with pray. That is one way, here is another. Start drafting legislation to have your state secede from the union so we have a place of sanity to work out of. Make Obama irrelevant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKRgv9r61jo http://www.secedelinks.org
KnowThyEnemy says
I did not end it with pray. I copied the post verbatim from the first link provided.
Also, I am against seceding from the union. Whatever it is that needs to be done, we should do for ALL of America!
jihad3tracker says
* * * THANK YOU, K.T.E., FOR THIS EXCELLENT LINK, AND FOR YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT IT * * *
We will have to wait for a Republican to win the 2016 election for any realistic chance of the law being enforced. I am a lifelong Democrat senior citizen who despises the traitor Hussein Obama and my party’s seditionist candidates.
There are eleven months remaining until the national vote, and at the pace which Muslims around the world slaughter humans, that is a virtual guarantee of Repub victory. Even one more attack in America will doom Dem candidates, especially Hillary.
And if SHE tanks, the 2nd tier contenders have no hope of prevailing. By the way, if you have a bit of spare time this week, watch Charlie Rose’s interview with Clinton — at least the segment on national security and the Middle East.
The studio crew lit her in a revealing way, not by broad soft banks of diffusion hiding shadows & contours. Consequently WE SEE CLEARLY AN OLD ALCOHOLIC HAG: bags under eyes, collapsed skin, hundreds of top-lip fine lines (from too much French kissing with lesbian lover Huma).
E Ward says
I was right with you until your last paragraph. Do you know even one human who gets better looking as they age? Of course not. But women are doubly penalized for being human. Her looks have nothing to do with her value. And I agree with you…the more terrorist attacks, the less likely Hillary will win. I don’t relish more violence, but facts are facts.
jihad3tracker says
Yes, we agree that no one gets better looking as they age (regardless of gender) — including Yours Truly. At age 67, Father Time has thrown me into a relentless blender of irreversible decrepitude.
My expanded point: Hillary is a morally corrupt person. Decades of scuzz, plus hidden drunk benders (the “fall” in her home several months after Benghazi) now show up clearly reflected in her face.
Wellington says
First of all, KTE, thanks for posting what you did. Second, I am going to play devil’s advocate here. As Robert Spencer pointed out to Jamie Glazov in the video above, Islamic terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS seek to effect change in America by force, but the Muslim Brotherhood has so far worked through the legal process (at least much of the time) here in America to get what they want. In other words, the MB is not using force, violence or unconstitutional means to effect what they desire, i.e., to eventually make America into a Sharia-compliant state. They are doing this by way of such initiatives as new legislation, proffering new interpretations of the Constitution (e.g., the First Amendment) and convincing Western elites in the political realm, academia and the media that their intentions are good and sound ones.
As I have posted before here at JW, I wish virtually all Muslims were of the ISIS and al-Qaeda variety because then it would become clearer much faster, even to so many of the clueless Western elites, what Islam really stands for. But this is not the case and stealth jihad, as opposed to active, violent jihad, I would contend, needs to be confronted by legislation even TOUGHER than the 1952 law you cited.
It all comes downs to proper knowledge of Islam and of Islam’s iniquity and mortal threat to liberty. Knowledge is indeed power. Not there yet. And even if we get there it will take, I believe, more legislation, perhaps even a new amendment to the Constitution making Islam the exception to First Amendment protection, and who knows what else because in order to effectively combat this oldest and best disguised evil of all time new legal ground of all kind may very well have to be explored, even perhaps, a la voegelnian, eventual expulsion of a great many Muslims, which under present law simply could not occur. Right now, America is proceeding into the future not fully equipped enough legally to deal with an iniquity that really does make Nazism and Marxism look like the junior varsity.
Hope you and yours are doing well. I enjoy reading your thoughtful posts here at JW. Take care.
KnowThyEnemy says
Thanks for the response. It is obvious that not only many more people need to wake up to the threat posed by Islam, but also spend time coming up with ways to effectively respond to this threat. Considering all the deceptive tactics employed by stealth jihadists, we have a long way to get there.
Angemon says
Wellington posted:
“And even if we get there it will take, I believe, more legislation, perhaps even a new amendment to the Constitution making Islam the exception to First Amendment protection”
Why? Just define what constitutes a religion, and make sure to stress out it can’t include any sort of political/legal/legislative aspects on its DNA. That should suffice for islam and protect against any future “religion” striving for the same goal.
Champ says
Excellent point, Angemon …
“One thing we can definitely say about Islam is that is it not solely confined to a belief system. If it is a religion it is not a religion only. Islam is a total system of life and contains within itself a particular social system, judicial system, and political system which includes geo-political aspirations – the conquest and administration of territory.”
Excerpt here:
http://newenglishreview.org/Rebecca_Bynum/Why_Islam_is_Not_a_Religion/
Wellington says
It’s more than being denied the status of a religion, Angemon and Champ. Nazism and Marxism are not religions but they too are protected by the First Amendment.
Even during WWII and the Cold War, Nazism and Marxism were not denied First Amendment protection. Even assuming Islam is denied religious status, something I think HIGHLY UNLIKELY to occur, it would still be protected under the First Amendment as a belief system. And it makes no difference too that it is a belief system that is “a total system of life and contains within itself a particular social system…..” So does Marxism, as an example, and it is still protected by the First Amendment. Oh no, what I’m talking about here is a whole new interpretation of the First Amendment (or the requirement for an amendment to the First Amendment) making Islam an exception to it, something which hasn’t even occurred with Nazism and Marxism.
Think outside the box. It is imperative to do so. “Simply” denying Islam is a religion, even if this effort were successful, still falls woefully short of what is needed.
TruthWFree says
I have been saying for some time (including in a meeting with my Congressman) that Islam should have no rights as a religion under the 1st Amendment because Sura 9-5, 9-29, and 2-193 plus others call for killing and subjugating 99% of Americans who are not Muslim. Bottom line however, the illegal Muslim Obama is the problem and the do nothing opposition is secondarily the problem.
Pig Jizya says
Great point: first they say that Islam has NOTHING to do with terrorism and then they say that if we just treat Muslims better there will be no terrorism. The stupidity is sickening and sleepwalking the world toward Armageddon.
sahani says
Muslims are making captured land from infidel not available to infidel any more and started migrating to infidel land and capturing this land too. Our leaders are foolish and aimless don’t know how to stop losing our land to ISlam . .
Jay Boo says
The Islamic temper tantrum gets milked again.
Muslims murder children in Paris: —
Obama apologizes for climate change.
In addition he scolds those who oppose Muslim ‘refugees’
eduardo odraude says
Enjoyed the two of you yucking it up. For example Jamie’s funny delivery when he suggested that maybe the weather was affecting Muslims differently than Yazidis and Christians.
eduardo odraude says
If you want to persuade people who are on the Left, advise them to check out Sam Harris’ youtube videos on Islam. While people on the Left refuse to listen to the conservative Spencer, they will give an ear to the more leftish Harris even though Harris is saying almost the identical things about Islam that Spencer says.
Harris comes from a scientific background and is an atheist, but that need not keep religious people from learning from him about Islam, which Harris considers by far the most dangerous and totalitarian of religions. By listening to Harris argue with liberals about Islam, a conservative can learn a lot about how the other half thinks on these issues. Harris is brilliant (though often mistaken I think on subjects other than Islam), and fascinating to listen to. See for example, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCOQukCn0kg
Georg says
A very astute point near the end about Obama’s [FBI’s?] untenable vetting of that which they assert doesn’t exist. Quite frightening, really.
Gamaliel Isaac says
I think the real reason for blaming terrorism on Climate Change is to get support for draconian measures to combat climate change, measures that will redistribute the wealth from companies to the government and those the government wants votes from.