Linda Stasi insults jihad murder victim as “male equivalent of Pamela Geller.” Ironically, Geller’s warnings foretold the slaughter. My latest in PJ Media:

The mainstream media has for years been in the business of justifying jihad terror and demonizing those who oppose it, but now it has reached an appalling new low.
Linda Stasi in the New York Daily News last Saturday portrayed jihad murderer Syed Rizwan Farook and his victim Nicholas Thalasinos as two sides of the same coin:
They were two hate-filled, bigoted municipal employees interacting in one department. Now 13 innocent people are dead in unspeakable carnage. … Make no mistake, as disgusting and deservedly dead as the hate-filled fanatical Muslim killers were, Thalasinos was also a hate-filled bigot.
Her equivalence founders, of course, on the simple and titanic fact that Farook was a mass murderer, while Thalasinos was never going to kill anyone.
But in her madness to justify the San Bernardino jihad murders, Stasi doesn’t bother to mention that.
Stasi is also too fastidious to provide the murderers’ names:
One man, the Muslim, was a loser who had to travel all the way to Pakistan to get himself an email bride. (I refuse to add to their fame by using the killer and his murderous wife’s names.)
But she doesn’t hesitate to defecate on the memory of the man Farook murdered.
And Thalasinos isn’t the only one Stasi defames:
The killer, however, became half of an Islamic Bonnie & Clyde, while the other died as the male equivalent of Pamela Geller.
Why does Stasi believe that Pamela Geller is the equivalent of Syed Rizwan Farook?
Geller has put her life on the line calling attention to and opposing the Islamic hatred and bloodlust that lead to the San Bernardino jihad murders and other jihad mass murders. Nothing is so sure-fire a way to earn the undying hatred of the Leftist media than robust and forthright discussion of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims. If Pamela Geller’s warnings had been heeded, Nicholas Thalasinos and the other San Bernardino victims might be alive today.
But they were not heeded, because of people like Linda Stasi.
By spitting on the dead and the one person leading the resistance to jihad terror, Linda Stasi is perpetuating the environment that enabled the San Bernardino jihad attack to happen.
Stasi’s article shows how rabidly hate-filled the Left has become today, and how far it has departed from any sense of basic human decency. Theirs is a Manichaean division of the world between the good and enlightened — that is, everyone on the Left — and the benighted yahoos of the Right, who have no rights that a Leftist is bound to respect. Even when they’re brutally murdered, a doctrinaire ideologue like Linda Stasi would rather clink champagne glasses over their graves than express any common bond of humanity.
Nicholas Thalasinos had it coming because he was a “right-winger,” and that’s a lucky thing for Linda Stasi: imagine her moral dilemma if Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik had murdered a hard-leftist, or even a fan of her hateful little column. She would be torn between crying for the beloved martyr and making excuses for the killers, since everyone knows that jihadis only resort to murder because racist, bigoted “Islamophobic” Americans drive them to it….
Read the rest here.
ElderlyZionist says
Linda Stasi should get down on her knees daily and thank Gawd it’s illegal to murder obnoxious *holes.
Jay Boo says
We must RESPECT the satanic verse moon-god religion and strive to be fair-minded toward Muslims.
Is it really fair for us to continually expect the followers of “The best of people” religion to behave like decent human beings when they are so convinced from reading their Korans that everyone else deserves to be killed?
mortimer says
Linda Stasi tries to understand Islam through political science and the flaky New-Age doctrine that claims ‘all religions are basically the same’.
Linda Stasi has not read the Sira, hadiths, Koran or Sharia law, but ‘knows’ religion because she is a cultural Marxists who never looks anything up in book, because she looks it up ‘in her gut’.
Why ever consult facts, when you can simply consult ‘your gut’?
Don McKellar says
It’s a misunderstanding of the academic necessity to divorce religions from personal bias when studying them. All religions must be considered “equal” to one another in that context. In an academic setting and method, such an approach is crucial to being able to study something dispassionately and with as little bias as you can. The problem we have today is that imbeciles such as Linda Stasi and the Mainstream Media and most politicians fail to separate an academic approach from the real world. In the real world in which we live, Islam is a vastly inferior religion which is savage and cruel and incompatible with advanced civilization. It is not the equal of Christianity or Judaism, when it comes to fitting in with our modern humanist societies in the real world, and is in fact in complete opposition to those societies in the real world. This is where the fatal flaw occurs for the foolish people who defend Islam: they have confused academic study and scholarship with real world application.
David Ramseur says
You start out as neutral and unbiased as you can. But after disseminating the facts and comparing/contrasting the religions you cannot conclude equivalency. The truth that Islam is incredibly bad while Judeo/Christianity is beneficial is blatantly obvious!
mahghan says
What would these liberal objectivist analysts of religion make of the Aztec religion which practiced plucking the hearts of live sacrificial victims in order to placate the Aztec gods? Would they say that any critique of such vile practices would be tantamount to Aztecophobia?
Gods should protect humans, not terrorize them.
Don McKellar says
mahghan,
That is a great analogy I have used many times on web boards. It seems to shut down a lot of left-fascists. Of course most just block it from their brains and motor on trying to show how the Bible is “violent” and completely ignoring also how I made it very clear to the in BIG BLOCK LETTERS THAT I AM AN ATHEIST AND COULD GIVE A DAMN ABOUT DEFENDING CHRISTIANITY — but they don’t want to hear it. Their brains are filled with politically correct cement.
But, again, you make a great point, and one I make myself.
Tom W Harris says
Linda should just drop dead and make the world a better place.
JawsV says
lstasi@nydailynews.com
Baucent says
Stasi writes with the poisoned pen of a spurned woman.
Don McKellar says
She gives us a clue to her own life story as a spurned woman. One can almost see her ex-boyfriend or ex-husband dumping her and then…
“… (he) was a loser who had to travel all the way to (place mail order bride country here) to get himself an email bride.”
Linda Stasi was probably dumped for a woman her ex met on an internet “meet Russian ladies” site.
E Ward says
Misogyny. Are you a closet Muslim?
Baucent says
Misogyny? I think you need a dictionary.
Don McKellar says
Needs a brain transplant more than a dictionary.
E Ward says
One thing among many objectionable things about Islam is their treatment of women, I’m sure you’ll agree. If you frequent sites that have any amount of Islamic comment, you will find misogynist comments galore. It’s disappointing to find it on this site. I am one of a few feminists who will publicly speak out against Islam. I also speak out against misogyny, and yes, I know what that is. And you do too.
gravenimage says
I was a “spurned woman” myself at one time–it was devastating and *extremely* painful.
But it didn’t lead me to hate men, and it *sure as hell* did not lead me to false moral equivalence or apologia for evil.
I don’t think Stasi being a “spurned woman”–even assuming such is the case–explains her viciousness in turning on a victim or by implication excusing his savage murderers.
? says
Is it me, or do all these leftists, Muslims, and criminals have this “inhuman” look about them?
OregonMuse says
Her name is actually Linda STASI? As in the old East German jackbooted thug police? How fitting.
Jay Boo says
Off topic but somewhat related
Which is worse Trump’s talk of border controls or Muslims murdering children?
Huff Post currently has a whole lot of articles expressing wild indignation at Donald Trump. Yet, their stories on the Paris attack do not seem to reflect the same level of INDIGNATION at Muslims who murdered over a hundred people many of them children.
Huff Post wake up to the TRUTH — It is ok to say that Islam is the filth that sponsors murder of children.
Huck Folder says
O/T, how to intellectually ‘frag’ stasi-like liberals:
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/
“Imagine every freshman in every political science class being told of this work, and reading the textbook on it, filled with scientific studies backing the premise. Imagine their first lesson being that Liberals are not logical or moral, but rather are narcissists, bent on pursuing selfish, hedonistic, rabbit-like behaviors destined to betray their own and destroy society. Imagine them being told that Liberalism is produced merely by a rabbit-like instincts, rather than intellect or morality. The simple and obvious association of political ideology with r/K Selection Theory would inoculate those students against any Liberal indoctrination in academia that they would be exposed to.”
And commentary here:
http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/a-critique-of-anonymous-conservatives-rk-selection-theory/
gravenimage says
I don’t think this characterization is true of all Liberals–but it certainly is of hard Leftists.
Angemon says
One thing can be said about Linda Stasi: she’s prettier on the outside than on the inside…
خَليفة says
Looks to me like she had two scoops of ugly for breakfast. So the inside is even uglier.
E Ward says
This again. No I won’t stop pointing out misogyny. But I also won’t quit pointing out that Islam is an ugly ideology.
Amy Glass says
I guess nobody ever calls a man ugly. Misogyny indeed!
Paddy OConnor says
You must be hard up …….
Edward says
“Her equivalence founders, of course, on the simple and titanic fact that Farook was a mass murderer, while Thalasinos was never going to kill anyone.
But in her madness to justify the San Bernardino jihad murders, Stasi doesn’t bother to mention that.
Stasi is also too fastidious to provide the murderers’ names” – Robert Spencer
Stasi like the rest of the Muslim world’s antagonists seem to think their provocation to commit violence is the sole fault of the victims. That MO ploy is also used to undermine a rape victim as it is widely being published. What is it that makes the perpetrators think that their exercise of free will to do wrong is excusable; in a greater case of that of an Islamic adherent? Oh btw, this same question should forwarded to those with a liberal mindset who are the instigators of this unacceptable phenomena. The left is aiding and abetting in these crimes indirectly.
As for the Jihadi avenging movement:
The Koran commissions them to do it, that’s why! Simply put, Allah has to be appeased for the Islamic adherent to earn their reward of paradise! God forbid, if Sharia law should ever complies here with our law of the land the muslim’s escape loopholes will always allow mistrials to be a fact of life with them. So, that’s why the muslims has a loose cannon attitude dynamics!
mortimer says
Linda Stasi might consider what peccadillos in her own life might be used by the JIHADISTS WHEN THEY COME FOR HER?
WHO WILL DEFEND Linda Stasi when the jihadists come after her?
Will other journalists smear Linda Stasi because she was attacked and victimized by jihadists?
el cid says
I have never seen any hate message whatsoever from Pamela Geller other than reporting on the hate messages received from Jihadists or would-be Jihadists.
It is considered ‘hate’ in America to quote verbatim Muslims engaged in hate.
This label has been given Pamela by CAIR and their ilk.
Somehow, it gets reported and reported and reported.
Is this reporter trying to draw a target on Pamela’s back? The very person who is standing up for us all?
Jayke says
I hate it when people are taught to steal, kill and destroy as a matter of pleasing a false god. Hate is an emotion and is neither right or wrong. Hating evil is good. The problem lies in what a person considers evil. When a society calls good evil it s in trouble.
gravenimage says
Important question, El Cid. Comparing Pamela Geller to a man who has been murdered–and *implying he deserved it*–is deeply threatening.
خَليفة says
She seems to be suggesting it’s ok to kill someone if they are as bad as you are.
Or is she merely being an apologist for savage, barbaric Islamic behavior.
Karen says
Exactly. She *suggest* things, so she has cover, but doesn’t have the guts to make direct statements. She simply suggests……she stays one hair away from directly saying Mr. Thalasinos deserved what he got. She writes garbage.
Jay Boo says
She is a Muslim so naturally she identifies with Muslims over their victims,
Muslims have no shame at all.
gravenimage says
Jay Boo, I don’t think there’s any reason to believe that Linda Stasi is Muslim herself–she is a Leftist apologist for Muslim savagery.
Georg says
Just sickening. At least we have JW to monitor and report such filth.
gravenimage says
The only good thing connected with this appalling story is that the comments on Stasi’s article at the NY Daily news were almost all disgusted by her calumny of the victim.
Julia says
This woman needs to be fired. That goes for her editor too. The Daily News also needs to issue an apology to the family. It is reprehensible that she would blame the victim of a terrorist attack for ANY reason. Disgusting!
Bezelel says
i somehow feel that Nicholas Thalasinos would feel honored to be compared to Pamela. Ms stasi on the other hand can only be compared the scum of the earth.
Renee says
Well well, so after all, and after more investigation it was not any remark of a “bigoted” Messianic Jew, these islamic terrorists had planned this YEARS ahead and fueled up on anger. Stasi blames someone without any evidence, but just based on prejudice against Messianic Jews. But Evidence shows we do not need her analysis for the future to help solve problems like violent islamic jihad.
Karen says
Without knowing anything about Linda Stasi, or reading any other articles spewed by her, I’ve concluded she is a hate-filled bigot herself. My, isn’t she clever, so subtly linking Mr. Thalasinos to the deaths of the other 13 victims:
“They were two hate-filled, bigoted municipal employees interacting in one department. Now 13 innocent people are dead in unspeakable carnage.”
Sorry Mrs. Thalasinos, your husband, victim 14, wasn’t innocent! At least this is what the bigot Stasi implies.
Stasi, the bigot, writes that Farook was a loser who had to obtain a mail order bride. She points out that Mr. Thalasinos also met his wife on-line, so that info must be highly relevant; feel free to draw conclusions!!
Note to Mort Zuckerman; do you ever read your own paper???
Kepha says
Under my real name, I dared to share an article by a conservative theologian that simply stated that the Qur’an and the Bible were not the same. The chief target of the author’s criticism was the 19th century Religionsgeschichte school of comparative religion. A couple of my friends and kin immediately accused me of accessing “hate and fear sites” because the article I posted didn’t echo the standard liberal mantras.
Hmmmm. I wonder if any of the victims of the Farooks was LGB or T? Would that change Ms. Stasi’s poisonous mind?
خَليفة says
I too use a “nom de guerre” in dealing with Islam. I am glad I am not the only one experiencing my siblings and friends calling me “radicalized” “hateful” “bigot” and other such names. I even have noticed the use of leftist tactics and the western appologist speech (echoing the mainstream media ) coming out of their mouths. It surprises me to see this in siblings as we were raised to be quite moderate.
I try to remind them I don’t hate Muslims, I just don’t like Islamic doctrine and don’t want Sharia in the USA. And there needs to be legal measures to protect people. They don’t seem able to grasp it.
You are not alone.
mortimer says
The Leftists are the real racists here. They do not really respect, but USE the Muslim ‘noble savages’ to destroy Western civilization for them…to soften it up for the TRIUMPH of socialist tyranny. They secretly realize that Muslims are barbarians, but play them along as rough people who buy a pitbull to terrorize their neighbors. Leftists are ‘riding the tiger’ of Islam, but they do not realize they will have to dismount once they reach their destination. The tiger may then have grown to such a monstrous size and ferocity that it will be beyond the control of the Leftists and they will be unable to master it. The tiger will turn on the Leftists first!
When the time comes either the Left or the Muslims will move to arrest, imprison and assassinate the others. A bloody war will ensue. Blood will flow everywhere. This will happen in most Western cities. We still have time to stop this from happening by stopping Muslim immigration and by deprogramming Muslims from Islam.
gravenimage says
Kepha wrote:
Hmmmm. I wonder if any of the victims of the Farooks was LGB or T? Would that change Ms. Stasi’s poisonous mind?
…………………….
One of the victims *was* Gay, Kepha. He appears to have been a brave man who saved the lives of at least four people by warning them of the shootings and urging them to get to safety:
“Gay Man Killed in San Bernardino Mass Shooting Credited With Saving Four”
http://www.advocate.com/crime/2015/12/07/gay-man-killed-san-bernardino-mass-shooting-credited-saving-four
And no, I doubt this would make any difference to the vicious Linda Stasi one way or another.
Asian Crusader says
Wow – looks like the undead Helen Thomas is back now after having “some work done.”
mortimer says
I admonish all those who post here that comments about a person’s looks are out of place, unless you look like a leading lady/man movie star, are a handsome/beautiful movie star, have won a beauty contest or have an important job solely due to your good looks, etc. Otherwise, grow up.
Having said that, I find the implication that Thalasinos and others ‘had it coming to them’ for being ‘politically incorrect’ is a DESPICABLE way Stasi tells us she wishes the death sentence for anyone who disagrees with her!
Who will defend her when the jihadists turn on her?
Rev g says
Not true. Any person, regardless of their own appearance, can opine about the looks of others. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, however a certain degree of consensus does exist about appearance. Your own statement alludes to that. Even fat, wrinkly, ugly people know what ugly looks like.
gravenimage says
True, Rev G–but looks are irrelevant when it comes to ethics.
Linda Stasi is ugly because of her blaming an innocent victim for his own death. Otherwise, it really makes no difference whether she is physically attractive or not.
I agree with Mortimer here.
Asian Crusader says
QUOTE (mortimer): I admonish all those who post here that comments about a person’s looks are out of place, …
This is a good (and, yes, quintessentially JUDEO-CHRISTIAN) concept.
gravenimage puts her finger on the key issue:
QUOTE: Linda Stasi is ugly because of her blaming an innocent victim for his own death.
Look at the picture again. Linda Stasi has clearly become PHYSICALLY ugly because her face has for years been distorted by gnawing, consuming Leftist hate. Perhaps some tragic event in her life led her astray, perhaps she was born with an unlucky disposition tending to BLIND HATE. In other words, the ugliness you see is not the result of unlucky genes or having got the short straw when beauty was handed out. In short, Linda Stasi is MAKING HERSELF UGLY by her blind hate.
EXPERIMENT: Show the picture to anyone from East or South Asia and ask them why they think she looks as she does? What the picture says to them. (No, really do it! Ask your Vietnamese manicure lady, your hairdresser, an older waiter/waitress at an Asian restaurant during a quiet moment, etc.)
Asian Crusader says
QUOTE (mortimer): I admonish all those who post here that comments about a person’s looks are out of place, …
This is a good (and, yes, quintessentially JUDEO-CHRISTIAN) concept.
gravenimage puts her finger on the key issue:
QUOTE: Linda Stasi is ugly because of her blaming an innocent victim for his own death.
Both mortimer and gravenimage are right. Look at the picture again. Linda Stasi has clearly become PHYSICALLY ugly because her face has for years been distorted by gnawing, consuming Leftist hate. Perhaps some tragic event in her life led her astray, perhaps she was born with an unlucky disposition tending to BLIND HATE. In other words, the ugliness you see is not the result of unlucky genes or having got the short straw when beauty was handed out. In short, Linda Stasi is MAKING HERSELF UGLY by her blind hate.
EXPERIMENT: Show the picture to anyone from East or South Asia and ask them why they think she looks as she does? What the picture says to them? (No, really do it! Ask your Vietnamese manicure lady, your hairdresser, an older waiter/waitress at an Asian restaurant during a quiet moment, etc.)
Independent Thinker says
Ms. Stasi missed something, didn’t she? There is at least one BIG and SIGNIFICANT difference between the two men…one committed mass murder and the other seems to have had no proclivity to hurt anyone. Now, which of the two men (one Muslim and one non-Muslim) is deserving of being hated/feared based upon his actions? Yep, the Muslim.
Vivarto says
Sell Linda to ISIS for $5 (I think that’s the going price for an ugly looking female).
Then after she has been gang-raped by these sub-humans, we can write an article about her being equally responsible as the rapists.
I am sure she’ll agree.
Asian Crusader says
Well, $5 is kind of high. IS is getting enough free offers from stupid Western women.
You may be able to get $2.50 – $3.00 assuming she can cook Arab food and clean without water. Of course, she will have to keep on her burqa at all times (don’t want to scare the purchaser’s wives, goats and children).
Also, of course, Linda may be volunteered as a suicide assassin against anyone who is not enTHRALLed by Islam, which is essentially what she is doing already.
Actually, living under (not among) people who share her murderous hate may over time lead her to relax and become less ugly on the outside.
Oppressaphobe says
I don’t know where the idea of THREE GREAT RELIGIONS came from anymore. I always accepted until now.
Did Mohamed forgive the woman at the well, who deserved to be stone to death, but said:
WHICH OF YOU IS WITHOUT SIN-you cast the first stone. When the crowd dispersed he told the woman
WOMAN, WHERE ARE THINE ACCUSORS?
I have none sir.
AND NEITHER DO I ACCUSE YOU—GO AND SIN NO MORE.
Did Mohamed tell his followers, put your sword back into its sheath, and go willingly to his death, praying to his heavenly father, asking his father to
FORGIVE THEM FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO?
The so called POPE now says not to evangelize jews because they know god.
But they reject JESUS CHRIST and the philosophy of redemption, forgiveness, and love.
The Jewish religion is a great religion, but the point is that JESUS CHRIST was something altogether different in religion and I see
NO REASON AT ALL TO COMPARE ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY.
In Islam they think THEY ARE GOD and they take human life as if they have the moral authority to kill anyone. Not even acknowledging that THEY HAVE SIN TOO.
The WHOLE POINT OF CHRISTIANITY is that ALL PEOPLE HAVE SIN.
Listen to Muslims speak, they talk over you and repeat whatever they are trying to spew out over and over again, endlessly.
But they never say YES, WE HAVE SIN AND I OR WE ARE WRONG AND WE WILL REPENT OF OUR SIN.
That’s the difference in a nutshell. And its all the difference in the world.
A Christian just needs to say a prayer in their hearts of repentance. What does a Muslim have to do to PROVE TO THE AUTHORITIES THAT THEY ARE TRULY “RELIGIOUS”????
They have to perform ENDLESS RITUALS, FIVE TIMES A DAY, ETC…and you better convince the AUTHORITIES that you are towing the party line or else…
That’s not true in Christianity. Now Christians have perverted this because all people are sinners but THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACHES AND INSTRUCTS so those who lose their way can be singled out.
Carolyne says
I would be proud to be the equivalent of Pamela Gellar, but I am not brave enough. I would be proud to be the female equivalent of Robert Spencer but am not for the same reason. I feel so privileged that there are people who will be brave for me and for civilization.
This man who Ms. Stasi libels killed no one and she, not knowing him or really anything about him except second or third hand slanders, in no way resembles the barbaric couple. She should be ashamed to even mention his name. She isn’t worthy.
k says
Pamela, a brave hero. Tells the truth. Should be honored by all freedom loving people.
and Robert as well.
gravenimage says
Hear, hear!
epistemology says
It’s getting more preposterous by the day. The killer and the victim two sides of a coin. Both of them were hate-filled bigots, very interesting way of presenting the case. I’m fed up with all this relativist malarkey. I feel like being tossed into a novel of Kafka or Anderson’s “The Emperor’s new Clothes”.
What kind of game are they playing? This stupid muzzie apologist can fuck off to some muzzie country and enjoy freedom of speech there.
Oppressaphobe says
We are happy to let them have their own country, half the globe +++ if they want.
So why can’t they leave our country alone?
If they did not have an agenda, they wouldn’t be waging warfare to infiltrate and overwhelm our society.
WHAT’S NOT TO UNDERSTAND HERE?
Asian Crusader says
QUOTE: So why can’t they leave our country alone?
Because they know what in a REAL Islamic country is like, and have decided that they would rather lose their lives drowning in the Mediterranean.
Being able to get welfare jizya from idiot kufar, being drooled over by “UNDERSTANDING” social workers and waived through by cowed cops AFTER committing rapes and robberies is just the icing on the cake.
Oppressaphobe says
You’ve really got a grip on this–wish everyone else did too.
People just can’t wrap their head around such evil; like serving the mother her own children for supper when the mother go and seek after their child.
Children 7 years old are bleeding to death from being raped by the monsters.
If people can’t get behind this, maybe they could just understand the idea of the tax for unbelievers that the muslims think they ARE ENTITLED TO, as you referenced :jizya from idiot dufar.
And the simple truth that musims lie and deceive for alla. What about the couple that took gifts for their child from the people they turned around and slaughtered.
This doesn’t come out of thin air. This is part of their belief system.
The American Monkey is a species that had better adapt or be extinguished.- it IS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES.
I thought they cared about endangered species?!!.
Jamey says
this Stasi woman has learned the primary lesson of the left very well… hate America and always take the side of the muslim murderers! Lefties have sworn to shield and protect the most worthless, the most crappy people, whether BLM scum or ISLAMIC scum And the dumb bimbo probably can’t figure our why Trump is winning!
UNCLE VLADDI says
Just like Linda Stasi and her ilk, Daniel Pipes just keep on Submitting to islam in public:
http://www.danielpipes.org/16331/trump-ban-islamists-not-muslims
He just did it again (and again, and again, and….)!
;-(