Here again we see how Leftist and Islamic supremacist groups use the term “Islamophobia” for both attacks on innocent civilians, which have no justification under any circumstances, and for honest examination of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to incite hatred and violence. These groups use the former to quash the latter, which will have the effect of allowing the jihad to advance unimpeded and unopposed.
Is that what the MSA wants? Probably, since it is a Muslim Brotherhood organization. According to Discover the Networks, “The Muslim Students Association of the United States and Canada, or MSA (also known as MSA National), was established mainly by members of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in January 1963 at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Nyack College theologian Larry A. Poston writes that “many of the founding members of this agency [MSA] were members of, or had connections to,” the Muslim Brotherhood or Jamaat-i-Islami. The three most significant founders of MSA were Hisham al Talib, Jamal Barzinji, and Ahmed Totanji, and all of whom were MB leaders of Iraqi descent. Other noteworthy individuals who served as early co-founders of MSA were Mahboob Khan and Malika Khan.”
Meanwhile, our nation’s universities are increasingly becoming thuggish centers of Leftist indoctrination where opposing views are forcibly silenced. This holds true across the country, from ostensibly Catholic entities such as Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire to secular ones such as San Diego State University.
“Muslim Student Association demands all ‘Islamophobic speech’ be punished,” by Alec Dent, College Fix, December 28, 2015:
The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is demanding that administrators combat Islamophobia by developing a “zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions.”
The demands, modeled after similar ones issued by black student associations at campuses across the nation, were lodged after a female Muslim student was allegedly attacked by a white man in a campus parking lot on the afternoon of Nov. 19, about a week after the Paris terrorist attacks, which killed 130 people.
At SDSU, despite reports that several witnesses stood by and did nothing as the attacker grabbed the woman’s hijab, as well as a police sketch of the alleged attacker, a police investigation could not identify a suspect, according to the San Diego Union Tribune.
Meanwhile, the female student who said she was attacked has not been identified. But she told Hanif Mohebi, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations-San Diego, that her attacker grabber her from “behind,” called her a terrorist, “choked her with the hajib” and told her to “get out of this country,” the Union Tribune reports.
Several comments on the article expressed incredulity over the attack, questioning whether it is a hate-crime hoax.
Yet less than a week after the alleged hate crime, SDSU’s Muslim Student Association held a protest against Islamophobia on campus that attracted hundreds of students.
Yasser Kaziha, a member of the Muslim Student Association, said that he personally knew the victim of the attack, and “when the attack on our Muslim sister happened here at SDSU, she felt alone after bystanders and witnesses who watched the attack did nothing,” he told the Union Tribune.
At the rally, the Muslim Student Association issued its list of demands, which members claim will help prevent future acts of bigotry against the Muslim community.
They demanded that the university adopt a zero-tolerance policy toward “Islamophobic speech,” mandatory bystander training, develop more courses on Islam, and increase funding for The Center for Intercultural Relations. Moreover, they demanded that “the SDSU administration address, alleviate, and eliminate systems of oppression that disproportionately target students of color, womyn, and all marginalized students on campus.”
Beth Chee, a representative for the university, told The College Fix in an email that the university has not issued a formal response to the demands, but members of the administration have reviewed the list and are currently “meeting internally and with the students to discuss their concerns.”…

Ann Inquirer says
Nothing will prevent future attacks of bigotry because these moslems are bigots themselves – it takes one to think they know one.
Harry says
I agree with your disposition.
The Muslims should learn to be tolerant and behave well with other ethnic groups and religions. They have harmed Christians and Hindus and many other relions.
Wake up Muslims and get out of the box. Please openly criticize what is happening by ISIS and other fascist and demand them to stop the stupid Fathwahs and Jihad tricks on non-muslims.
It will only then the west will be tolerant.
How many Muslims females have been molested, acid thrown own them and disfigured and stone throwing at so called honor killing. Where were you Muslim woman in MSA keeping tight lipped and not dare to criticize then.
Do not cry in anguish when one Hijab was torn off where as so many females have been mutilated and killed upon the saying of on asshole imam who is a biased person!!!.
A lesson for you all Muslims to note too
John Boston says
They can’t stop being terrorists/ jihadists, unless they stop following the Qur’an. This is a point Robert Spencer makes often, because it needs to be said: the most devout Muslims, those who stick to the Qur’an most closely, are those most likely to become terrorists/ jihadists.
Shane says
The Muslims want the college to enforce Islamic blasphemy laws and many liberals will agree to that including HIllary Clinton. Clinton supports the Muslim proposal in the UN to make criticism of any religion a hate crime.
Screeminmeeme says
Problem is that if a Muslim would do what you just described, he would be violating the tenets of Islamic law. Remember that Islam and freedom…..Islam and compassion…..Islam and tolerance…..are all mutually exclusive terms.
Indeed, being kept in a ”box” where free exercise of the will is forbidden and total submission to a bloodthirsty ”god” is the fate of those who choose to follow Muhammed and his diabolical Quran.
Pig Jizya says
Agree Ann. The definition of “a Muslim” is a horribly bigoted and sexist person. Against homosexuals, Jews and women. Muslims are bigots, period.
Pig Jizya says
And we have the polls to prove it.
billybob says
“Members of the administration have reviewed the list and are currently ‘meeting internally and with the students to discuss their concerns'”…
For sure the administration must have many concerns to discuss. Certainly they must be shaking their heads about the educational failure presented to them by the Muslim Students Association. How did these students manage meet the university’s eligibility requirements in spite of lacking basic understanding of the Constitution? Undoubtedly the administration will offer remedial courses to these students on the Constitution and democratic principles.
EYESOPEN says
If only…
worldcitizen1919 says
It’s ironic you know. We Baha’is have been persecuted, tortured, executed, imprisoned, refused citizenship, our work places closed, refused entry into universities, our cemeteries destroyed and vandalised, our homes burnt down, spied on, denied lawyers, accused of being spies for Israel, unclean and not to touch or go near anything we touch and where are the Muslims who cry out for justice????
Yet when they receive a slight verbal insult or maybe even a push or shove the world must bow at their feet and move mountains to ensure they are treated like royalty.
I believe in fairiness and justice for ALL but what about Muslims? We’ve been persecuted in their lands for over 170 years and they remain quiet unless it’s them,
Do they like it when they receive even a bit of discrimination which is nothing to what we have been subject to??
It’s also kind of ironic that the way BahIs have been treated for over a century and half now God is showing them how it feels and do they like it????
Muslims may be persecuting us in many lands but the entire world is turning against Muslims and although it’s no joy to see and I don’t wish it on anyone they need to know first hand just how much they’ve made us suffer and develop some empathy for others.
Yet we stand up for Muhammad and the Quran and treat Muslims as friends. In return they hate us so much. Does God stand by and watch idly?
I shouldn’t say this, but now they’re getting a bit of the bitter taste they’ve been dishing out to us Baha’is for over a 170 years. Let’s hope they learn from it.
The people Muslims most hate are the Baha’is yet when everybody abandons them and turns against them we Baha’is still remain their ONY REAL friends.
No matter how they have treated us I still ask not to hate on them because they are ignorant and have been brainwashed by their preachers.
John C. Barile says
Yes, it is an irony that supremacist Muslims demand rights and accommodations that they deny others. It is no injustice to them or their deen to speak out and say so.
John C. Barile says
They treat the Ahmadiyya similarly.
Myxlplik says
This is more Dawa, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key lies in the greater interest of Islam as a whole.
superseding says
It truly is one law for them! We have helped create 8this sense of entitlement by giving into them which has helped boost their sense of superiority
traci94 says
I think that by silencing any critical discussion of Islam, these people will eventually cause increased hostility against Muslims because people will feel that they have no other recourse available. Besides, who gets define Islamophobia?
John C. Barile says
And that suits them just fine. They both define “Islamophobia” and generate it. More grist for their self-serving victimization mill.
Paladin says
I doubt the incident, as described, occurred at all. Sounds made up if you ask me. That being said, the best way to get people to stop holding you responsible for acts of terror committed in the name of your death cult, is for your death cult to stop committing acts of terror.
EYESOPEN says
Spot-on correct.
stevo-k says
time and time again we have found that muslims have no shame in claiming attacks that never even occurred. I smell a rat
john spielman says
“well is’t that special”, the muslims want protection for their fascist islamic supremacist beliefs against criticism (which is not only permitted at SDSU but encouraged against Christianity, Republicans /conservative values etc.) .. now for the Church Lady dance
Louis says
There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Bigotry and racism exist, of course—and they are evils
that all well-intentioned people must oppose. And prejudice against Muslims or Arabs,
purely because of the accident of their birth, is despicable. But like all religions,
Islam is a system of ideas and practices. And it is not a form of bigotry or
racism to observe that the specific tenets of the faith pose a special
threat to civil society. Nor is it a sign of intolerance to notice
when people are simply not being honest about what
they and their co-religionists believe.
— Sam Harris
Westman says
SDSU is part of the CSU state-funded university system. The real power, as always, lies with the body that distributes funds and sets policies for the system, the Board Of Trustees of the CSU.
These students are under the delusion that they can get local policies on demand when granting any special bias for a group would come from the BOT.
As we have repeatedly observed, if there is any scrutiny of Islam, Muslims congregate in public, throw a tantrum like a child wanting candy at the checkout counter, and make demands while looking about for strangers who are sympathetic. Sometimes it works.
Myxlplik says
yeah, speech is the enemy, and Islam is the victim.
Yeah. If the trials are public this will be interesting :).
More Ham Ed says
“the Muslim Student Association issued its list of demands” – now that’s islamorealism.
superseding says
Spot on!
Veritas says
It’s hardly surprising that bystanders would not intervene in an altercation between a hijab-wearing muslim and an average person. Islamofauxbia aside, it would be difficult judging by recent events to ascertain who the victim was. Alternatively, it might just be another case of ‘campus-place violence’.
Their pseudo-pious indignation is always accompanied by a list of demands. It’s ironic that they are always espousing the tenets of Sharia while attempting to vilify and silence anybody with an opposing viewpoint.
Juxtapose the reported histrionics with this clip.
S Barkat says
Christians are abused, persecuted, and segregated nearly everywhere. “Christian cannot eat in almost all Muslim owned restaurant , schools, colleges, office buildings nor they can drink water in same glasses which is worst kind of hate on religion in Pakistan but this new trend of prohibition on use of toilets in schools is inexpressible in words.”
The incident is reminiscent of the case of Asia Bibi, a Christian mother who is sentenced to death for blasphemy after Muslim women saw her drinking from a “Muslims Only” water source.
Many will falsely or ignorantly claim that this has nothing to do with Islam, but this is a key fundamental of the religion
Muslims are the one who are most intolerant wherever they are. in the world.. In some Islamic countries, Christians are not allowed to built churches ,in others, Churches are being destroyed. No Christians literature in institutions is allowed. ,Christmas celebrations are being banned. Islam should be exposed. Quran dehumanised non-muslims and teaches intolerance.
William Di Gennaro says
“If Freedom of Speech is taken away then dumb and silent we will be led,
like sheep, to the slaughter.” George Washington, 1783.
mortimer says
FREEDOM OFSPEECH IS THE RIGHT TO OFFEND—EVEN TO BLASPHEME–
U.S. law values and permits the RIGHT TO BLASPHEME because THERE IS NO ESTABLISHED ‘American religion’. What is ‘sacred’ to one person may be highly ‘blasphemous’ to another. Without an officially defined state religion, it is not the responsibility of the judges to intervene.
-Justice Clark in 1952 wrote: “…it is enough to point out that the state has no
legitimate interest in protecting any or all religions from views distasteful
to them. … It is not the business of government in our nation to suppress real
or imagined attacks upon a particular religious doctrine.”
-Justice Frankfurter noted that beliefs that are “…dear to one may seem the rankest ‘sacrilege’ to another,” and added concerning “sacrilegious” speech: “…history does not encourage reliance on the wisdom and moderation of the censor.”
India is one of the two largest countries. The Supreme Court of India permitted the right to blaspheme in 2014.
The Supreme Court of India on Monday 3 March 2014, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) by Advocate M L Sharma seeking intervention by the court in directing the Election Commission to curb hate speeches. Dismissing the plea, the Apex court said that it could not curb the fundamental right of the people to express themselves.
“We cannot curtail fundamental rights of people. It is a precious right guaranteed by Constitution,” a bench headed by Justice RM Lodha said, adding “we are a mature democracy and it is for the public to decide. We are 1280 million people and there would be 1280 million views. One is free not to accept the view of others”. Also the court said that it is a matter of perception, and a statement objectionable to a person might be normal to another person.
mortimer says
The right to blaspheme religion is one of the most elemental exercises of political liberalism. One cannot defend the right without defending the practice.
– Jonathan Chait, Daily Intelligencer, January 7, 2015
-If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” – George Orwell
-“The principle of free thought is not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought we hate.” -Oliver Wendell Holmes, US Supreme Court Justice, in United States v. Schwimmer (1929).
-“Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.” -Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media (1992).
-“The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish.” – Justice Robert H. Jackson, chief justice at the Nuremburg Trials
-“…if any opinion is compelled to silence, that opinion may, for aught we can certainly know, be true. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility.”
-John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859).
Hugh Vincelette says
Also, in a ruling by the Supreme Court of the US some years ago, they said “At the heart of liberty is the right to define ones own concept of existence, of the meaning of the universe and of the mystery of human life.”
Hindu American says
Why does this allegation reek of a set up, a hoax?
According to the miffed muslima, her attacker (1) grabber her from “behind,” (2) called her a terrorist, “(3) choked her with the hajib” and (4) told her to “get out of this country,” while “several witnesses stood by and did nothing”. Wow! Fours acts of grievous and demeaning violence in one fleeting moment.
How does one choke with a hijab? Near impossibility in the way its tightly worn or wrapped. If true, then isn’t a hijab a dangerous garment, and therefore, must be banned? Like capes for super men and women who fly around jet engines or through wind tunnels?
Then the incredulous claim that not one, I repeat, not one witness did anything. Wouldn’t that be easy to verify? I mean, come on, where’s a leftist liberal on a Californian campus when you need one?
Being called a “terrorist” is a tough one. I suppose that Nazis, skinheads, KKK’ers, BlackPanthers, etc. all now have legitimate reasons for getting offended.
Being “grabbed from “behind” on a campus in California! Lady-in-a-head-wrap, go easy on that shrink wrap and loosen up, will ya? As a clueless teen, you need to go out with friends and on dates more often.
Arthur says
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head: this woman is clearly fabricating the entire incident.
Where did it happen (as in, exactly which sidewalk)? When did it happen (as in, exactly what time interval)? Where were the ‘witnesses’ standing? How tall was the attacker? Was the attack with the left or right hand? Did you have a cell phone on you at the time? Did you call campus security? Did you photograph the offender? Did you photograph the witnesses? What did your hijab look like that day? Where were you coming from? going to?
Do any on campus video cameras or her class schedule corroborate that? Were there people walking in that area that time of day that could testify that they didn’t see the victim or the offender?
An investigative journalist or halfway competent detective would probably discover she can’t consistently answer any of these questions.
She should be exposed for telling lies and punished appropriately. There is no reason to act on false reports. If anything, the University should defend its student body from these fabricated insults to their civility.
Hugh Vincelette says
Assuming that she wanted a male to step in and come to her defense, I am reminded of the elderly woman who was buried beneath rubble following an earthquake. She stuck her hand out for help but withdrew it when a man’s hand was the first to offer assistance.
Wellington says
By now the term “Islamophobia” should have been laughed out of existence by virtually the entire non-Muslim portion of the American population, which is to say roughly 99% of America. The fact that it hasn’t serves as testimony to just how many dhimmi fools exist out there.
Still, as Islamic atrocities mount, coupled with profuse self-pity by Muslims who do next to nothing to address all the hatred towards non-Muslims found in the Islamic texts, the use of the term “Islamophobia,” which already elicits scorn from many, will fall into even further disrepute, though the last element in America upholding this silly term will be the academic world which has dumbed down considerably while at the same time embracing totalitarian restrictions on free speech under the guise of prohibiting hate speech. Just about the dumbest part of America today is the educational establishment which has gotten more and more ridiculous with each passing decade.
mortimer says
Agree. ‘Islamophobia’ is an attempt to quash critical thinking and avoid answering tough questions.
The elephant is in the room. That elephant is the IRRECONCILIBILITY of Islam with modernity.
Islam and free Western values are OIL AND WATER. Islam always tries to become supreme over freedom, because Islam means ‘submission’ and no one is as submitted as a slave. Islam is a euphemism for ‘slavery’.
Islam-slavery is IRRECONCIABLE with freedom.
mortimer says
Islam has many inherent problems that contradict modern ideas, human rights and civil liberties:
1 No Golden Rule 2 No free speech 3 No democracy 4 Jihad – holy war of world conquest 5 Honour killings 6 Taqiyya – sacred lying 7 Taqlid – group think 8 Misogyny – repression of women 9 Rape of kafirs as jihad prizes 10 Genocide 11 Ethnic cleansing 12 Anti-Semitism 13 Al-Walaa wal-Baraa – Islamic apartheid 14 Torture 15 Plundering 16 Cruel and unusual punishments 17 Backwardness – stagnation 18 Violence against women 19 Slavery 20 Discriminatory Sharia law 21 Hatred of the arts 22 Pedophilia disguised as child marriage 23 Fifty generations of cousin marriage and genetic defects 24 Cruelty to animals 25 Extortion tax to humiliate disbelievers 26 No historic basis 27 Anti-intellectual obscurantism 28 FGM 29 Arab racism 30 Theocratic totalitarianism 31 Vigilantism 32 Supremacism
Islam is a Bronze Age Death Cult combined with Arab racism, misogyny and a totalitarian political system. None of Islam’s problems are logically or ethically defensible.
With so many things wrong with it, Islam deserves to be criticized as IRRECONCIABLE with modern values.
Freedom from criticism is not a human right…it is an anti-blasphemy law.
Freedom from critical thought is not a human right. It is anti-intellectual OBSCURANTISM.
Nuri bin Daud says
La Allah Illa YAHWE ueMuhammad bin Sharmutta bint Jinn RassoulShaitan.
(There is no God but YAHWE and Muhammad son of a who.. daughter of
demon is Satan’s Messenger).
Hugh Vincelette says
Forgive a moment of levity , but we used to say “There is no God but Microsoft and Bill Gates is its prophet.” No offence was meant towards Microsoft or Bill.
mortimer says
Why must I not criticize an idea?
Walter Sieruk says
All the PC talk about just how “terrible Islamophobia” is. It’s more of a matter of exposing the truth about the falsehoods and violent dangers of Islam that some call “Islamophobia.” In others words,many times it’s Islamorealism that the left is afraid of ,which they call ” Islamophobia” So Islam must be very weak and fragile religion that it can’t hold up to or stand up to criticism of any kind.. So Muslims and other people of the left try to silence critics of Islam. .To explain this another way, Plato had written that Socrates had said “A life unexamined is not worth living.” Likewise it may also be said that “A religion unexamined is not worth believing in.” Many times from reading news reports and talking with different Muslims I have come to the conclusion that faith in Islam is based on powers emotions and strong feelings and not on logic or reason. Therefore what Benjamin Franklin has printed in POOR RICHARD’S ALAMANCK may apply to a person faith in Islam. For that ALMANAC “The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason.”
billybob says
We can find truth in literature and even truth in music. A single note may ring true. A carpenter may true up a piece of wood. We can find truth in Christ’s teachings. Even if you don’t believe in a historical Christ, there is a certainly harmony in it that finds resonance with many who are familiar with it. We can find truth in the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, whose profound spirituality and belief in justice inspired the world. We can find truth in the teachings of the Buddha, which offers a holistic view in counterpoint to Western philosophies that separate Man and God. It is also said all truth can be found in the Lotus blossom, a thing of perfect beauty.
There is no truth to be found in the Quran. Islam became corrupted from the moment Muhamad picked up a sword and felt the thrill of lust for worldly power sending a shiver down his spine. It is at that very moment it all went so very wrong. Before that moment he may have been a ray of light. After, he was a fallen man with a corrupted soul who led his followers astray.
Like the story of Icarus or Dante’s Inferno, Islam could have be a great myth with a moral lesson and thereby be “truthful”. “Take heed – do not be like this ambitious fool Muhammad who traded his soul for a sword!” …but Islam actually believes Muhammad was chosen to be the Messenger of God! Such arrogance on top of such ugliness and everything else that is wrong with it. Islam has no humility.
As you have said, “So Islam must be very weak and fragile religion that it can’t hold up to or stand up to criticism of any kind”. With such glaring flaws, Islam depends upon external enforcement to keep its followers in line. They are not to question it. Questions leads to dangerous doubts. These doubts can lead to apostasy, and apostasy can lead to death.
I fear the evil Islam represents, and I am proud to call myself an Islamophobe, assuming this word describes my fear.
Hugh Vincelette says
I feel the same. But I’ve always liked the quote from the late Valclav Havel, activist and former president of Czechoslovakia , when he suggested ” Follow after those who are seeking truth. Flee from those who have found it.”
Islam :- the religion for ruin of our childrens future says
“zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions.”
You would think places of “higher learning, (supposedly intelligent people) would figure out that Islam is the only religion than needs a “zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions.”
William D. Dean Sr. says
According to the Quran the young woman in the t-shirt and tight pants is a whore and should be stoned. None of these women should be attending school and should be beaten for doing so. After all don’t true Muslims shot young girls in the head for wanting an education? They ave many times, bombed schools and burned the people inside alive.
Linde Barrera says
I am Islamophobic and proud. The Muslim Student Association can blow it out their noses! But I do not advocate violence against any Muslims.
JAS says
Muslims live in the seventh century and demand that the whole world live there too. But we do not and will not… so endless conflict with the backward, barbaric, primitive savages of islam. I have a hard time believing that a billion and half human beings voluntarily live with their brains turned off.. There has to be a part of the “umma” that still uses their grey matter and may be convertible to reason and the use of human intelligence.. Even wild, dumb animals use all their intelligence so why can’t muslims?
Shmooviyet says
Will the honorable and tolerant MSA be releasing an official, approved list of specific words and phrases considered “islamophobic”, to help all others know what language to avoid?
Can a demand against ‘islamophobic ACTIONS’ be far behind? That would be one long list as the offended get that way pretty quickly and easily. ( “Keep eyes averted when passing woman in hijab” might be an acceptable start.)
Shmooviyet says
Meant the list, rather than ‘demand’ against ‘phobic actions…
billybob says
Items at the top of list of specific words and phrases considered “islamophobic” should be obvious. They seem to really get upset if you insult their Prophet Mohammad (May he been eternally sodomized by pigs). (That right there should be good for 6 months in jail.) Then drawing any image of him would also be at the top. Calling Allah the Moon God would get you in deep doodoo. Pulling the hijab off a woman would be classified as an assault giving you two years of hard time in a federal penn (where you would have to study the Quran). Speaking of the Quran, it would be a serious offense to burn one or even throw it into a dump. Towards the bottom of the list would be eating pork or drinking beer in front of a Muslim, or even eating anything at all in front of a Muslim during Ramadam (but that would be an offense only between sunrise and sunset, so don’t worry about it).
IndianTiger says
The perpetual victimhood continues despite muslims’ stellar record of oppressing and terrorizing others. I forget the source but someone rightly said: muslims are a turbulent minority and an oppressive majority.
islamophoebia is a convenient term to silence others, as ex-radical Majid Nawaz says. islamofacsism is the real deal whereby muslims are ever so touchy about their cult’s criticism. We must never give in to muslims’ demands because this will only generate more demands.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Why do they even have funding for “The Center for Intercultural Relations” at all?!
How does a dish of curry “relate” to Western foods?! Is that what they mean?
If not, they must mean “The Center for Submitting to islamic Extortion!”
NancyM says
If we want to begin a program of zero tolerance for things like Hate Speech…ban the Koran at SDSU.
John says
The United States and its allies are accustomed to confronting external threats. Democracies are generally uncomfortable about facing internal threats. The Muslim Brotherhood and others are exploiting our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms to demand tolerance of its medieval religious practices and to repress free speech where it gives offense to them. In this sense, they are effectively imposing shariah blasphemy laws in America, Canada, Europe, Australia and elsewhere.
Shariah is fundamentally about power – the enforcement of a body of law, not faith. Therefore it is a political force, not a religious one. In the words of Muslim Brotherhood theoretician Sayyid Qutb, “Whenever an Islamic community exists which is a concrete example of the Divinely-ordained system of life, it has a God-given right to step forward and control the political authority so that it may establish the divine system on earth…”
http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-7-blasphemy/
Jerry says
It may be a good idea to be implemented as soon as all Humnophobic, Christianophobic, Judeophobic, Hinuphobic, and Non-Muslim-phobic suras of Koran and hadiths and all other Islamic writings are permanently removed’ but then, of course, there would not be any Islam left.
Karen says
Here’s a thought; if a student was assaulted, how about applying the existing laws against that?
A call for the special protection of Muslims on the SDSU campus, in addition to a resolution in Congress specially tailored to Muslim interests….I’m sensing a trend for 2016.
I read with interest that the student body of SDSU voted down a BDS resolution earlier in the year. Perhaps the pot is being stirred a bit….
Angemon says
They don’t even have to try to hide it under a term like “religiously motivated hate speech”. Pushy little buggers.
It seems that’s the case – islamophobia is so rampant and prevalent in America that muslims have to resort to fake hate crimes – I bet islamophobes are not attacking mslims in order to make muslims look like liars. Sneaky little bastards, aren’t they?