Donald Trump’s recent call for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on,” is not a new or original idea. Senator Rand Paul put forth a similar policy recommendation way back in July, following the Chattanooga jihad attack, and again in November called for a halt to “all immigrants, visitors and students” from countries with “large jihadist movements” from entering the United States.
In the wake of the San Bernardino jihad massacre, Mr. Paul and his fellow senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz have amped up this message, calling for a halt on immigration from nations with “active terrorist networks,” and a “moratorium on refugees from countries with a significant al Qaeda or ISIS presence,” respectively.
Significantly, this is along the lines of proposals drafted by The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) following the Boston Marathon jihad bombing and mass murder in 2013.
These candidates and all elected officials with eyes to see need to work hard to “make the case” for these steps, which may sound drastic to some, and hate-filled and bigoted to those on the Left.
The below article I wrote back in August is a modest effort to “make the case.” By using visual concepts like “sandboxing,” and enforcing the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), America can protect herself from jihad attacks, and reverse seven years of willful blindness in the face of Islamic terrorism.
When I start hearing “sandboxing” and FARA being discussed by Republican presidential candidates, I’ll feel greatly encouraged. As I conclude below,
It is time to “sandbox” Islam in America, and use decisive, legal means to counter its threat to our freedoms and our way of life.
‘Sandboxing’ Islam: How to Protect America from Jihad Terrorism,” by Ralph Sidway, Jihad Watch, August 21, 2015:
Enforcing the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) can give us the legal and tactical edge in countering the threat from Islamic supremacism.
Background
It should be obvious for anyone with eyes to see that Islam — its scriptures, the example of Muhammad, its doctrines, and its overall ideology — is behind the spread of most terrorism and unrest in the world today.
From the Islamic State (ISIS), Boko Haram, al-Nusra and al-Shabaab, to slightly older groups such as al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Muslim Brotherhood, to lesser known jihadi organizations throughout Central Asia, India, Southeast Asia, the Pacific Rim, and China, a survey of terrorist attacks reveals Muslim involvement throughout the entire world.
Here in the United States, we are seeing a dramatic rise in Muslim “lone wolf” jihad terrorist attacks (and, as some have described them, “known wolves”). Further, from all points of the compass, we are seeing literally tens of thousands of Muslims flocking to the Middle East to join the Islamic State caliphate and support the jihad with their very lives.
The scenario gets worse. Some analysts argue that we are seriously underestimating the numbers of Western Muslims joining the Islamic State.
Here at home, we have a “full blown insurgency.” The FBI has already arrested seventy IS-inspired Muslim terrorists, and has active investigations of IS-inspired jihad plots in all 56 of its field offices. NewsMax reports “the government’s terrorist watch list carries 700,000 to a million names.”
The Challenge: Jihad-Linked Mosques
This is all indisputable fact. The threat is real and growing. Even worse, the threat is specifically from devout, observant Muslims who attend mosque. Behind every lone-or-known-wolf jihadi and every Islamic State recruit there is a mosque where they are receiving instruction in Islam.
That should give us pause, as four separate studies in recent years show that 80% of mosques in the U.S. teach, preach or advocate for jihad and the imposition of sharia law in America.
Confirming these mosque studies are proven links between mosques and terrorists. For example, one of the two Mississippi Muslims recently arrested for trying to join the Islamic State is the son of the imam at the local mosque. Many terror-linked mosques have spawned multiple jihadis. The Phoenix mosque attended by the Garland TX jihadis is notorious for having two other members in federal prison on terrorism-related convictions. Perhaps most infamous is the Islamic Society of Boston, which was attended not only by the Boston Marathon Bombers, but by numerous other jihad-terror-linked Muslims. The list goes on and on.
For many people, especially in our political class and certainly among the 2016 field of presidential candidates, there seems to be no solution to this national security nightmare of terror-linked mosques and known wolf jihadis. To date, there is no coherent, principle-based policy to address Islamic terrorism in the United States.
The Solution: ‘Sandboxing’ Islam in America
This is where I believe the simple analogy of “Sandboxing” can help us.
You’ve probably heard the term, even if you’re not a computer geek. One tech source offers this definition:
A “sandbox” is a play area for young children: it is supposed to be safe for them (they cannot hurt themselves) and safe from them (it is sand, they cannot break it). In the context of IT security, “sandboxing” means isolating some piece of software in such a way that whatever it does, it will not spread havoc elsewhere.
If we think of America as being, ideally, a safe and free place for its citizens, within which we should be able to live, work, play, and, as the ubiquitous bumper sticker says, “Coexist,” then when it comes to Islam and Muslims, we need a solution analogous to the IT security process of “sandboxing.” We need to isolate malicious jihadi forces, “in such a way that whatever they do, they will not spread havoc elsewhere.”
What would “sandboxing” look like when it comes to Muslims in America? In practice, it could include the following policies:
- A moratorium — a complete freeze — on Muslim immigration. Senator and presidential candidate Rand Paul expressed a similar policy concept following the Chattanooga jihad murders of five US servicemen, proposing a halt to immigration from Muslim countries with known jihad activity. Going one step further, Franklin Graham wrote at the same time that “We should stop all immigration of Muslims to the U.S. until this threat with Islam has been settled.”
- All mosques must be classified and treated as “agents of foreign power,” in accordance with the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), a U.S. law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938.
The law presciently allows for application in gray areas such as Islam presents, as it states that any entity with a “political or quasi-political capacity” disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances. The purpose is to facilitate “evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons.” [Source]
Islam certainly thinks and behaves like a foreign power, is guided in America by the Muslim Brotherhood, the Saudis and other foreign Islamic groups, and has a definite political dimension. (See also here.)
- Any and all mosques associated with Muslim terrorists must be investigated, and if found to be advancing jihad doctrine, sharia law, and Islamic supremacism over the United States, they should be prosecuted and closed, in accordance with the FARA act referenced above.
- Stop all foreign funding of mosques, whether by FARA, new legislation, or executive power. We already know that Saudi Arabia is providing extensive funding to advance its extremist Wahhabi strain of Islam worldwide, including of mosques in America, as is Turkey. There already exist covert lobbying groups for Muslim nations, including Iran.
These are just some starting points to aid in getting this conversation going. The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) has an 18-point platform with similar policy proposals which may be considered as well.
We must have hope that, just as illegal immigration has become a major issue in the presidential race, so also we may be successful in elevating public awareness of the clear and present danger from Islam and Muslim jihad terrorists. This is a generational if not century-long struggle ahead of us, and should resonate with voters.
The concept of “sandboxing” is, I believe, the most helpful image in making our case to not only the American people, but also to the political elite and the 2016 candidates.
We must publicly challenge the Republican presidential candidates to take the initiative, and to fearlessly raise the issue of Islam up to the same level as Immigration. We must demand of them to be bold and daring when it comes to defeating jihad. The defense of our nation, our freedoms, and the lives of our fellow citizens and men-and-women in uniform should be paramount for whoever would be Commander-in-Chief. This issue will be topmost on that person’s desk in the Oval Office from Day One. Better to tackle it now with a strong and visionary policy, than to be knocked back on our heels by a surprise attack in 2017.
Now is the time to put misbehaving Muslims and their terror-linked-mosques on time-out. Islam is at war with us. More and more Muslims are heeding the summons from Islamic State and Al-Qaeda, taking up arms against us in this war, and killing American citizens right here at home. Denying the reality and threat of Islamic jihad is not a valid policy, it is civilizational suicide.
It is time to “sandbox” Islam in America, and use decisive, legal means to counter its threat to our freedoms and our way of life.
_______
Ralph Sidway is an Orthodox Christian researcher and writer, and author of Facing Islam: What the Ancient Church has to say about the Religion of Muhammad. He operates the Facing Islam blog.
jihad3tracker says
Hillary Clinton facial expression when talking about Trump’s call for a TEMPORARY ban on FOREIGN-BORN Muslims is 50% deer-in-the-headlights utter panic + 50% “My lover Huma is furious about this !”
Alex says
Not only Clinton. Add 95% of the media and 100% of the liberal elites and their followers. The festival of the utter outrage of the useful idiots is rolling on.
Shane says
The latest poll said that about 37% of Americans agree with Trump, and about 65% of likely GOP primary voters agree with Trump, so those Republicans who are attacking Trump over this will lose support. It will just take a few more mass murders by Islamic jihadis in AMerica for the majority to support the sensible police of greatly reducing Muslim immigration.
Jay Boo says
The Obama regime is out of control.
They could not filter out the terrorists even if they wanted to.
Presidential candidate Hillary says that such talk of “stopping Muslim immigration until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” — is aiding and abetting “the Enemy”
Yet, she apologized to Islam when Muslims murdered Americans in Benghazi.
Head-bump Hillary and her honey Huma are aiding and abetting “the Enemy”
Shane says
What our Islamic enemies want is for the USA to continue to take in large numbers of Muslims every year so that the immigration jihad will conquer America. That strategy is working in many European countries as the Muslims have a much higher birthrate than the non-Muslim population. Also, in prisons in America and Europe Muslims are very active in recruiting converts and jihadis.
Even worse, Muslim terrorists are infiltrating the refugees and are now in many European countries.
Patti says
Denying them any physical base of operations is crucial.
Jay Boo says
The Chattanooga jihad attack, the Paris attack, the San Bernardino jihad massacre.
THE VEIL
Obama had to do a special (damage control speech) to cover up his long-standing gross indifference to the victims. He almost appeared to show sincere sympathy for the victims at the beginning and a brief display of genuine indignation with his fellow Muslims at the end of the speech. Too little, too late though
THE BETRAYAL
Hillary is no doubt saying, “Can’t we just move on” and “What difference does it make”.
dragaozao says
Sandboxing is reasonable. Islam (the ideology) has to be confronted like communism was in the 50’s. Not to see this need, will only cause more victims and a more violent backlash.
PrayerWarrior says
I think we all know how the main stream media will spin this before it even gets out the gate: concentration camps.
But the fact is, concentrations camps were first used during the Boer Wars (11 October 1899 – 31 May 1902) between the British Empire and the Dutch Boer (‘farmer’) colonists, and were the key reason why the British won that war. The British had invaded the Boer state to add it to its empire, and they found themselves up to their necks in guerrillas who would strike in one place and then retreat and hide in the civlian farms where they could be resupplied and rested and made able to attack again. It was the first insurgency the 20th century began with. The British won it by destroying farms and creating a network of camps all over the country where civilians could be contained and made unable to support the guerrillas. But this was done so incompetently (because the invading force was from overseas and ill supplied) that the camps eventually became virtual death camps because of health problems like epidemics. (More than 50% of the British casualties were caused by illness rather than enemy action.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War
But that said, the key difference is that the British where the invaders there. We are the ones who are being invaded. And the internment of the Japanese Americans during WW II (still a debatable topic) seems to have not be nearly as incompetent as what the British Army did to the Boers.
Sandboxing seem pretty light weight stuff compared to a full out concentration camps. But the likely reaction to it by Muslims is what will probably move us towards harder measures later on. Muslims are most decidedly NOT Japanese.
Francis Lankester PhD says
Robert-could you comment on this criticism of the ‘80% of all mosques promote redicalism?’ Thanks
http://bridge.georgetown.edu/debunking-the-80-of-american-mosques-myth/
Robert Spencer says
It’s self-contradictory: it says there is only one anecdote, not four studies, and then it goes on to discuss the four studies. It is largely ad hominem — those who conducted them are “anti-Muslim” and other such nonsense. It tries to make something out of nothing: that one study is unavailable online doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or has no value. It tries to obscure key facts: “The measuring stick for the mosque’s alleged promotion of violent beliefs was the simple presence of pre-modern Arabic texts and other documents, and whether or not an imam, when asked by the infiltrator, recommended one of those texts.” Clearly, then, in these mosques some imam recommended a text promoting jihad violence, and the author of The Bridge piece is trying to wave that away. In sum, this Bridge piece epitomizes the shoddy methodology that they accuse the studies (that is, the ones they deny exist) of employing.
eduardo odraude says
I note that the critique of the 80% figure seems to come from the Al-Waleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.
According to http://www.sullivan-county.com/islam/front.htm
eduardo odraude says
One can find the Al-Waleed Bin Talal Center named if one scrolls down to the bottom of the critique of the 80% figure.
eduardo odraude says
Francis Lankester,
The critique of the 80% figure says the Freedom House researchers have a “questionable” history. When you click on the link associated with the word “questionable,” you are taken to a CAIR critique of the Freedom House report
http://pa.cair.com/files/mosque_response.pdf
According to the critique by CAIR, there is no problem with Islam whatsoever, Islam is a tolerant, moderate religion that believes in freedom of conscience.
Sam Harris, a neuroscientist and left wing critic of Islam, said CAIR is “an Islamist public relations firm posing as a civil-rights lobby”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris/losing-our-spines-to-save_b_100132.html
Harris also said that “CAIR seems to be allied with the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas” and has five footnotes providing evidence.
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/theocracy-with-a-human-face
To see that CAIR is not telling the truth when it unambiguously portrays Islam as a moderate, peaceful religion that accepts freedom of conscience, check out the links at http://www.quotingislam.blogspot.com, which cites core Islamic texts linked to a university database.
eduardo odraude says
Francis Lankester,
The critique of the 80% figure says the Freedom House researchers have a “questionable” history. When you click on the link associated with the word “questionable,” you are taken to a CAIR critique of the Freedom House report.
pa.cair.com/files/mosque_response.pdf
According to that critique by CAIR, there is no problem with Islam whatsoever and Islam is a tolerant, moderate religion that believes in freedom of conscience.
Sam Harris, a neuroscientist and left wing critic of Islam, said CAIR is “an Islamist public relations firm posing as a civil-rights lobby”
huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris/losing-our-spines-to-save_b_100132.html
Harris also said that “CAIR seems to be allied with the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.” Harris has five footnotes providing evidence.
samharris.org/blog/item/theocracy-with-a-human-face
To see that CAIR is not telling the truth when it unambiguously portrays Islam as a moderate, peaceful religion that accepts freedom of conscience, check out some of the links on the right side of this website http://www.quotingislam.blogspot.com, There you will find core Islamic texts linked to a university database.
Oppressaphobe says
We did not have these discussions before political correctness.
When the need arose, America did what it had to do so let’s not lose sight of the fact that
WE DON’T HAVE TO GIVE OUR ENEMIES ANY LONG WINDED EXPANATION, RATIONALIZATION WHEN IT COME TO NATIONAL SECURITY.
We are tip-toeing around a REAL AND PRESENT DANGER,for PC.
Glad to see the intelligent dialogue now, at least on JW and at the Trump rallies but we are in the TOO LITTLE TOO LATE phase of everything now.
somehistory says
Since mosques are barracks for the army of islam…they all…every one of them advance the unholy code of evil conduct of islam, the struggle moslims feel inside until they can kill someone who is their *enemy* and approve and advance the delusion of islam’s supremacy. of brutality of war over spirituality.
All of them…not just the ones that may *seem* to be *radicalizing* moslims for they are all doing the work of islam, satan’s wild beast for conquering the world of mankind.
Michael Copeland says
Here are two uncomfortable facts. Islam itself advocates jihad: it is a “communal obligation” (“Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.1). Islam itself advocates the imposition of sharia law. It is, in fact, its only aim.
Islam is permanently at war with the non-Muslim world, which is “Dar al Harb”, the Realm of War. “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims” (“Reliance…” o9.0).
In war Muslims are authorised to lie, such as in taking the Oath of Allegiance. The Times Square would-be jihad mass murderer took the Oath: “I sweared”, he told the judge, “but I did not mean it”.
There is every reason for a restriction on Muslim immigration. The doctrines are not going to go away.
Oppressaphobe says
Obama believes that bringing Muslims to America will make them, “well, uhhhhh, just like me.”
He thinks that they will shed their skins, like he did, and partake of American society.
Some might, but he is naivil (both naïve and evil). And he is oh so willing to break a few eggs to make the world what his grandmother told him it would eventually be–BROWN.
But he is out of step with everybody, except the fawning left. Muslims would kill him if they could, Americans have never despised a leader like this and even the lying politician class think he is over-the-top!
No, Muslims are not going to assimilate and not in our lifetimes are they going to reform. But Obama doesn’t care that he destroys America to get his way. HE WANTS A BROWN WORLD JUST LIKE GRAMMA TOLD HIM IT WOULD BE.
Angemon says
Indeed.
Tim says
Notice how the largest number of mosques are located in states where borderline is connected to either waterways or areas where porous border security is a problem…
dumbledoresarmy says
That map of mosques in America is very, very interesting for all sorts of reasons, and would bear a lot of further analysis.
What would be even more interesting would be to get a bigger-scale map, break it down state by state and look at where exactly, within each state, the mosques are, vis a vis significant Infidel military and other infrastructure (whether transport hubs, say, or sites of cultural, historical, and/ or religious significance).
You will observe that those states with the lowest concentration of mosques are also what might be called, roughly speaking, the American ‘heartland’. That is perhaps where the reconquista will begin from…from the area of lowest infestation.
I hope that ACT for America has a copy of this map in their ‘war room’. I hope they’re figuring out where they need to conduct heavy-duty membership drives, to mobilise the local Infidels…
Further thought: it might be fun to take that map and then overlay on it a map of active ACT for America chapters and members..one would then have a picture not only of the network of Muslim military bases (forward operating bases/ forts/ arsenals/ magazines/ bomb factories/ ‘safe houses’ for jihadis/ jihad incitement-and-recruitment centres) all across the USA, but of the Infidel resistance and how it is mobilising.
One could also take that map, make it bigger – wall map size – then start putting coloured pins in it, to represent plotted/ threatened and/ or attempted or achieved Jihad attacks. And put in pins to represent those American-passport-holding Muslims who are known to have departed, from this or that state in the USA, to go join Islamic State.
eduardo odraude says
Information made visual can be far more efficient in some ways than text alone.
A key point I try to keep in mind is to avoid exaggerating. One must give only information that is reliable. Otherwise we discredit criticism of Islam. The actual facts, even if not as bad as some exaggerations, are quite bad enough to mobilize defense and resistance.
eduardo odraude says
I hasten to add, dumbledoresarmy, that my comment was not directed to you. It was directed to me as much as to anyone. I’ve found your comments educational and entirely reliable.
Michael Copeland says
See this map – with digital “pins” – of muslim rape of underage girls in UK:
https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/muslim-grooming-paedo-map/
“grooming” in UK tabloid parlance is not hairdressing: it is preparing girls for sex.
dumbledoresarmy says
Re ‘sandboxing’.
There *are* still not a few Infidel countries in the world – some in the Caribbean, some in the Pacific, and even a few in Europe (Iceland) – that have few or no Muslims inside their gates.
*Those* countries, if they are smart, could learn from the *disaster* that a Muslim presence has been for so many, many other countries, whether Western of Eastern, first-world or third-world.
*Their* moment is NOW. They must slam shut their borders against Muslims, NOW. They must keep Muslim countries at arms’ length, no matter how tempting the proffered bribes, trade ‘offers’, whatever. They should *refuse* to deal with any Muslim entity.
If they do that, then no matter how poor, small, remote or struggling they might be, they will still go forward into the 21st century with a better prospect than *any* of the other nations in the world, no matter how large and rich, that are now afflicted with deadly-dangerous Muslim colonies, rapidly expanding.
Matthieu Baudin says
The internment of ethnic Japanese following the outbreak of WW2 was a necessary measure to limit the possibilities for spying at a critical time. Back then it was permissible to be practical and to get things done. The current political spokesmen move backwards and forwards between describing the Violent Jihad against the U.S. and allies as a ‘War’ and then retreat into a mode where they dampen public concern and attack those who want some effective policy and action.
Oppressaphobe says
Good observation. They PLAY WITH THE AMERICAN MONKEY.
somehistory says
Ben Shapiro has a video where he shows that the number of *radicalized* moslims is not a minority, but a majority. Very interesting to watch. Don’t have a direct url as I watched in on GOPUSA.com/the loft about Donald Trump being right on immigration.
eduardo odraude says
I think you mean this Ben Shapiro video:
Oppressaphobe says
The best way to monitor a mosque is to attend. I called my local mosque and they claim not to have any restrictions on attendance, mainly Friday nights? but I believe there are daily events.
So concerned Americans should get a group of neighbors together all willing to attend mosque. Now when they don’t treat you fairly you can sue them and then the public will become aware of the problems in the mosque. Right now we know zero!!!
What was interesting in my discussion with an imam is how QUICKLY the conversation turned to victimization “how poor the black in Africa are compared to americans” all the garbage that you hear on the internet:
HEY GUYS, GUESS WHAT, IT IS COMING FROM THE MOSQUES.
Oppressaphobe says
I love the game played by the liberals wherein they ACCUSE YOU OF DOING JUST WHAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING.
Hillary Clinton is ABSOLUTELY SHAMELESS! I don’t think her soul exists anymore–bill just had a chip put in her brain that makes her like a wind-up presidential candidate. He really wants the WH back!!
Her famous line has been that her opponents are “playing right into isis hands.”
A despicable tactic but the most basic observation is that she is playing right into isis hands.
They have stated that they want to infiltrate the refugees. She is promoting the idea of many refugees in that she attacked Trump and I have not heard her ramp up the safe zone in Syria post SB.
It’s got to be one or the other. Actually she was the one most in Trumps camp by advocating for a safe zone in Syria. Either she agrees with Trump and pushes a safe zone, or she is all about refugees and she is playing right into isis hands.
Jim Peters says
Trump’s numbers went up again. There is historical precedent for keeping Muslims out. We all know what’s going on. We know the Republicans want Trump out. They fancy themselves king makers and want to control the electorate. They will lose to Hillary in the general election and the Republicans will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again when Trump goes third party. Carly Fiorina is done after her anti-Trump remarks.
Extraordinary actions are required in extraordinary situations.
Oppressaphobe says
Yeah Fiorina is pretty hateful and its just hard to listen to her bash other candidates. I wrote her off with her unthoughful comments about Trump.
Oppressaphobe says
The best commentary I have ever heard on Islam in America is that Islam most closely aligns itself with the liberals, not only because the enemy of my enemy is my friend but because they share an ideololgy:
they are both socialists and authoritarians that don’t believe in the individual.
Liberals don’t even understand that they are the same as Muslims. They actually think they are better than Muslims, ironically. Liberals ‘respect’ Muslims but Muslims DO NOT RESPECT LIBERALS, they want to convert or kill them ultimately.
So the next time you want to bang your head against the wall wondering why liberals do not defend the mistreatment of women or gays or children?????????all the victims that they exists for and because of……
Just realize that both of them are just like Nazi’s (yeah exactly what they accuse conservatives of being) and it is truly MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY.
Look what happened to Trump for even daring to off the reservation!!
Andrew Sapia says
It’s amazing how the media has spun this, as if everyone and anyone from anywhere in the world has a legal right to emigrate here. It is ridiculous. We have the right to regulate immigration and restrict people coming from any country or countries that we choose. We can make any rules we decide to in order to weed out dangerous individuals. The fact is that there are several countries that are Muslim majority countries that we are foolish to allow unfettered immigration from.
You do not have a right to emigrate to the US period!
Based on the text of the Quran and the example of the so-called prophet and his companions and the history of Islam and the way it has operated in various host societies throughout its history. For example, Afghanistan had been a nearly 100% Buddhist country now there is not a Buddhist left. Everywhere Islam has gone the host society is changed in a negative way. The reason is simple. Their scriptures promote hostility toward non-Muslims and the idea that Islam is superior and has an imperative to harass and eventually subjugate non-Muslims. This is a demonstrable fact and the history of Islam is replete with examples of how this doctrine of Islamic supremacism has negatively affected the host population and so any non-Muslim majority country that allows Muslims to emigrate must have the ability to vet individuals and a responsibility to its own citizens to limit the numbers because it is the numbers that tell the story the more Muslims the more problems for the native population.
Oppressaphobe says
See what happens when people don’t know history?
Maybe all history teachers of the last 30 years should be charged with crimes against humanity.
Perhaps the ones now teaching will learn a lesson, but I would bet most are muslim sympathizers.
Oppressaphobe says
The muslim agenda is basically the GLOBALISTS AGENDA.
They both want to have a small incestuous ruling class and then a bunch of duped masses. They don’t care if they are alla worshippers–they just need them to be oppressed and brainwashed.
The muslims fit ever so well into the globalists glove. They read one book, don’t question authority, unless it’s American or satan as we are known to them.
So everything that is happening is not all the hard to understand. The people at the top don’t worship alla they worship money and power but they are simply USING THE LITTLE MUSLIM DORK to do exactly what they want done.
The biggest problem the globalists have had has been Americans–so they are picking America apart through their agent–ISIS AND OTHER MUSLIMS.
Omar Kahlid says
Stopping immigration has ALWAYS been used in US policy. If people would read the queeran then you would understand it is a totalitarian form of government, not any kind of religion. There are no, so called, moderate mooslems. Only those that wait until it is safe to rape, murder and steal the unbelievers property. Read it before speaking.Read it before making any judgement. Stop allowing media to tell you what it says. Sex an animal, it is there. Sex the dead, it is there. Rape children, it is there. Lie to cover up true isloom, it is there. Murder so you can then commit rape, it is there.