I was on Fox’s Sean Hannity Show on December 4, 2015, discussing the Islamic State’s plan to bring down the American system by means of a large number of jihad attacks.
I was on Fox’s Sean Hannity Show on December 4, 2015, discussing the Islamic State’s plan to bring down the American system by means of a large number of jihad attacks.
Pig Jizya says
The excuse “ISIS kills mostly Muslims” is not an excuse but a condemnation. If an extremely dangerous animal to humans also is a cannibal, does that make it any less dangerous to humans? STOP using this retarded excuse.
I guess the Muslim is into conspiracy theories. Good for Hannity not to allow the Muslim to talk anymore after that.
Jay Boo says
In reference to Imam Mohammed Sadiq:
Why can’t the Muslim speakers just begin making their counter argument without always beginning with “in the name god most merciful and gracious”
Are they trying to suggest their partnership with Allah gives their lies more credibility than those speaking the truth? Does the value of what they have to say not have the validity to stand on its own merits? Are they trying to exploit the ingrained prejudices of Muslim listeners?
Hannity should have let him speak more if he had anything meaningful to say.
Hannity appeared to have little tolerance when this Muslim speaker, Indianapolis Imam Mohammed Sadiq claimed to have no knowledge connection to ISIS and terrorism.
Jack Diamond says
The invocation helps consecrate the airwaves and all of America to Islam. I suppose they can now call it an Islamic waqf. Or maybe it’s like those prayers uttered before halal slaughter.
Jack Diamond says
I don’t see them targeting Muslims in Paris or San Bernardino. I just see them targeting kaffirs.
But Muslims are the victim and must remain the victim, an obligatory condolence card to the dead infidels but, it is their government that’s really to blame for their deaths since Islam does not cause extremists, U.S. policies do. Do we really have to give this (enemy) propaganda airtime?
Here is Al-Adnani on what Muslims the Islamic State kills and why:
“The Islamic State doesn’t make permissible the blood of a muslim, rather we do not target nor kill anyone except the combatant kuffār, and every one of you knows this very well, even though we are accused of this in the western media. If we wanted to target civilians and innocents, then the roads (we are in control of) are full of them and the markets are crowded (with them) but we are the most careful in terms of protecting the Muslim blood. If you support us & help us in our fight against the crusaders with your tongue & limbs we will support you & protect you, however if you stand in the camp of our enemies against us then what are you waiting for from us (other than fighting you)?”
Pig Jizya says
I want to expand on Obama’s excuse “ISIS kills mostly Muslims means ISIS isn’t Muslim” If an animal — lets call it “ISIS monkey” kills humans but also other ISIS monkeys, does that make it not an ISIS monkey? How does killing other ISIS monkeys make it not an ISIS monkey?
That is Obama’s retarded excuse for Muslims.
T. C. Storm says
95% of the people killed by criminals are other criminals. That MUST mean that those people aren’t criminals and don’t represent criminality.
Jack Diamond says
Yes, Muslims are to be merciful to one another and severe to the disbelievers, but it ain’t an absolute. Nothing could be more Muslim than killing other Muslims. The first Abu Bakr (with Khalid the Sword of Allah) was an expert at it. Most of the Rightly Guided Caliphs were gruesomely murdered by equally devout Muslims. Muhammad had a rival mosque burned down, intending to kill everyone inside. The history is a cannibal feast.
Sunan Abu Da’wud Volume 3, Book 40, Number 4744:
‘Arfajah told that he heard the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: Various corruptions will arise in my community, so strike with sword the one who tries to cause separation in the matter of Muslims when they are united, whoever he be.”
Foot note 4153, the English translator of Sunaan Dawud, Professor Ahmad Hasan admits that it is permissible to ‘cannibalize’ dissident Islamic group/s. He writes: ‘The Prophet (may peace be upon him) did not tolerate disunity and schism among Muslims. Therefore, he ordered that, instead of causing separation and disagreement in the community, it is better to kill the person who causes disunity.’
–Abul Kasem “Cannibalizing Islam”
Fitna, opposition or discord, toward Islam or within Islam, is worse than a slaughter. The Qur’an says so. Certainly, nothing un-Islamic about killing Muslims aligned with the kuffar and fighting the Caliphate.
The Bull says
The reason why more Muslims are killed is because they have access to more Muslims. They kill anyone who is not radical Sunni (including Shias and moderates)
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Now that is well said!
For my $: If you remain muslim after seeing, 24/7, all the horrifying things done by your faith? Then you have assumed the risk.
And I say this as a Roman Catholic who would not have stayed in the Church if the scandals within it had not been decried and redressed.
Nighttimer says
Another one to keep in mind: saying that “ISIS kills mostly Muslims” is no different from saying “the Nazis killed mostly whites”.
Both of them are technically true – but they also obscure the fact that both radical Muslims and the Nazis are specifically out to get certain groups.
And let’s not forget that neither IS nor the Nazis are particularly secretive about their sheer hostilities, anyway. Abubakar Shekau (from IS in West-Africa, aka. “Boko Haram”) is loudly proclaiming that he’s launching a jihad against Christianity, and the people of IS in the Levant & Iraq are screaming their threats against anyone who’s not a sunni Muslim from every minaret and rooftop.
The religious minorities of the Middle East *are* being targeted. They *are* being singled out for persecution, and “ISIS kills mostly Muslims” is nothing less than a disgusting attempt to deny that.
..
And the best part is, the whole “ISIS kills mostly Muslims” is even wholly beside the point here. The Nusra Front (i.e. al-Qaeda in Syria) is also targetting non-Muslims, as are most of those other “moderate rebels”.
Every group in Syria that’s not sunni Muslim is vulnerable and exposed to persecution right now. Christians are by far the biggest and most visible group, but groups like the Druze, the Alawites, the other Shi’ites and the handful of Bahai’is in Syria are every bit as much at risk.
Of course, the Left doesn’t give a flying fuck about *them* either, but hey…
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
This is a dark path we are on. No questions are left unanswered, where we are going is obvious for all to see. The only question remaining is when we get there. Political correctitude is so strong that alternatives must be bypassed in the name of Islam’s reserve status as a religion.
Mathew Solo says
“And, insomuch as we know that by His Divine Law nations, like individuals, are subjected to punishments and chastisements in this world, may we not justly fear that the awful calamity of civil war which now desolates the land may be but a punishment inflicted upon us for our presumptuous sins, to the needful end of our national reformation as a whole people? We have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of Heaven; we have been preserved these many years in peace and prosperity. We have grown in numbers, wealth and power, as no other nation has ever grown. But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace, and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us; and we have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own. Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us!”
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Ann Inquirer says
Good to see you on a major network. It’s about time.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Spencer’s frequency of visits is correlated to death count. When they sense that a bit of truth is necessary, they have to bring him on. The truth hurts.
somehistory says
That islam adherent has been on Hannity numerous times and always says the same things.
The moslim interviewed who blamed everything and everybody except moslims/islam made a point of saying it’s a *global* problem.
And it is a *global* problem because moslims are carrying out their inner struggles to kill other people all over the globe. islam is practiced in every country to one extent or another. The greater the extent of travel allowed to them, the greater the likelihood of terrorism.
Lies…so sickening to hear even occasionally. Lies…told every day and repeated endlessly in behalf of satan, the father of the lie, is death-dealing to all who believe them.
The abyss is awaiting satan and his children who follow his lying example.
How many will be killed before then is anyone’s guess. But America is just beginning to see what islam means firsthand, up close and deadly. isis wishes to repeat 9/11 even if they have to do it in a multitude of smaller attacks like the one in California.
More Ham Ed says
Every time a “Muslim leader” of any kind is interviewed, they display loudness, arrogance, defensiveness, ad-hominem attacks, deception, changing the question, deflection, etc. Never a sincere answer. Never a straight answer. Never humility always arrogance. That should tell ya’ something.
John Johness says
That is because of the underlying epistemology of Islam. If the Qur’an is the truth, then everything after it is mere words of power or emotion.
They can never have objective facts. Anyone who has talked to a Muslim knows this. It all goes along nicely and then they will come out with the most outrageous “fact”. Arabic language is all about power and emotion. It is pointless to even try. the best pathway is to get them talking about the Shia or apostates. Then they just go ballistic, they can’t help themselves to vent their purity and this gives away their hand.
Dave J says
Muslim leaders prove themselves to be intellectual midgets, illogical blowhards and emotional drama queens every time they open their mouths.
All arrogance, no humility and zero tolerance for others. Like excitable 5 year-olds with automatic weapons.
Dave J says
The cheerful Imam first invokes Allah then blames everyone except Muslims, while smiling and laughing.
Taqiyya in action.
sheik yer mami says
These Mohammedan spokesturds are highly trained agitprops.
But above all CAIR are enemy agents.
abad says
Muslims talk with guns, bombs, and hijacked airplanes.
Muslims do not talk with a mouth.
Nation First says
It’s terrifying in itself that we have a completely dud “American” and his gang of sundry rif-raf all over what used to be a government. The US and the west in general is being degraded day by day by this character from the depths of the PC barrel. Who is Obama? Why is he still in power? We have been invaded. Wtf? Thoroughly vetted immigrants from England used to have to register. We collapsed?
TheBuffster says
I’m happy that Robert and Brigitte got to have their say, but Hannity isn’t a very good moderator. I’m often dissatisfied with the way he handles a panel discussion, and this one was no exception.
True, the imam – I’ve seen him before – is a dropkick, but Hannity gave him next to no time to speak and talked over him when he was speaking, coming across as having invited him on as a mere token Muslim for the purpose of treating him with contempt. Hardly an example of “fair and balanced”. I can guarantee that if Siddeeq had been allowed to speak even just half as long as Brigitte (he had only 17 seconds, she had 57) he wouldn’t have come off looking any better than he did, but Hannity would have come across as fair and balanced, and rather patient (since Siddeeq seldom ever answers the questions he’s asked). As it was, Hannity came across as rudely demeaning his guest, with prejudice.
It would have been better not to have invited the guy at all than to have him on and then give him short shrift like that.
Also, the way Hannity asked Siddeeq the question, “Here we have it again, Islamic terror, Muslim terrorism…” he had to *know* the Imam was going to have to address that statement first before he got around to answering the question (if he ever did). Hannity knows this guy and how he’s going to react. If he *really* wants him to answer his question, he should frame it in a way that’s more likely to get a direct response. That’s the professional way to proceed.
Many times I’m turned off by Hannity panel discussions because he lets his guests talk over each other and I can’t hear what *anybody* has to say. Again, less than professional. But this time Hannity made himself look even worse.
BC says
We have grown in numbers, wealth and power
He omitted to mention that much of that wealth was from the sweat of slave labour. Not only that but later the US workers were terribly exploited by the masters as well
BC says
I agree about Hannity he is a very bad mannered host and always talks over the guest who is giving an answer to what Hannity asked
Ashley says
TheBuffster…well said! I agree.
It wasn’t fair and balanced, and I have no idea why this imam was invited to the panel only to be rudely cut off and essentially ignored. Once the dude opened with “in the name god most merciful and gracious” I wanted to hear more from him. It is important not to silence “crazy.”
To be fair, the imam DID attempt to interrupt and the job of the moderator is to address that. But the dude certainly should have been given an opportunity to participate in the discussion once the ground rules for rebuttal were drilled into his Swiss cheese brain.
IMO, Hannity cut no favors to the cause.
Judi says
I love it that Hannity hardly let the muslim scumbag get a word in edgeways.
Mitch says
I did enjoy that. And Hannity actually gave Spencer some elbow room this time, which made for an informative segment.
worldcitizen1919 says
I believe that America is in grave danger from within and without and that whether or not America is brought to her knees or not depends largely upon the response of the everyday American towards terrorist attacks.
If they leave the policies and security operations in the hands of authorities law and order will be maintained but if average Americans have knee jerk reactions and form vigilante groups and attack Black Muslims then America will implode because the weakest fabricof American life is her race relations which are continually at boiling point.
If terrorist attacks trigger black and white race riots throughout all major cities in America then that will signal the end of America as a super power.
This is a kind of warning or prophecy from around 1912 about what could happen to America irate relations weren’t healed…..that American streets would run with blood and an ‘enemy’ would at that time attack America. If that is true I see a plot here. From these words below I see these terrorist attacks as taunting Americans to retaliate against Muslims in America thus provoking a civil race war within the United States which would destroy America as we know her today. This was foreseen over 90 years ago and a warning issued.
“Abdu’l-Bahá in His arraignment of the basic weaknesses in the social fabric of the nation—of remedying, while there is yet time, through a revolutionary change in the concept and attitude of the average white American toward his Negro fellow citizen, a situation which, if allowed to drift, will, in the words of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, cause the streets of American cities to run with blood, aggravating thereby the havoc which the fearful weapons of destruction, raining from the air, and amassed by a ruthless, a vigilant, a powerful and inveterate enemy, will wreak upon those same cities.”
Excerpt From: Effendi, Shoghi. “Citadel of Faith.” Bahá’í eBooks
Bezelel says
I can’t help noticing how much manpower from law enforcement is used to stop and or capture the evil do’ers in any given event. We have too many soft targets to allow importing more threats. Multiple attacks in one city would be devastating. Shelter in place is not a plan. There may not be any spare cops to answer your call.
Mahendra Singh says
I dropped all my Muslim friends. I was not sure when one would blow himself up in my presence. You see,
I cannot stand blood especially if it is my own.
TJFreedomjihad says
Bezelel: Your well observed and highly important comment, reminds me of the recent vast interesting essay and comments here: Tet, Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive
http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-take-two-islams-2016-european-offensive/#more-38032
Though long and detailed, with much food for thought, and planning. As Justice Jeanine said this week, prepare now, and number one, buy your gun, legally, and 4 more things here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNUGqC6CEfA
And for laughs, try this remark on,
When I think of the typical angry muslimes., there are times that I can’t help thinking of this incredible scene, in ‘Bruce Almighty’ – ‘Anal Dwelling Butt Monkey’ (2003) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ7QMrR81yc
Mohammadans are like a horde of ADBMs, maybe it was the imam’s behavior, most all seem to be the same fast talking a**h*** no accounts. I look forward to them crawling back to where they came out of–deep darkness. (side remark-also I remember the videos and pictures of the American like beautiful Persian society before the tragedy of ’79 in iran, when it was weaponized by evil.)
No accounts because all they ever do is hate, destroy, tear down, whine, and expect respect, and (it’s all written down for the whole world to see for all time, plainly), if they’re pious, which is eternally impossible to ever give them, due to their creation in evil, for evil.
When they’re not pious and nor yet deadly, one never can be sure when evil will fully metastasize within, or metamorphosis will occur, in reverse. Outward signs only happen for those who wish to ritualize themselves, openly, seemingly with impunity from the naïve victims.
Bruce did a great job in this scene, wish he could take care of them all. So y’all have a little laugh with this bit of humor.
Bezelel says
TJFreedomjihad, Thanks for the links and the comic relief. I have Gates of Vienna bookmarked but haven’t been on it for a while.
Jflow says
I’m not so keen on these short interviews and I don’t think it’s good to cut off the imam. They didn’t really give him much time to speak even if he’s wrong. Let him make his case, otherwise it just makes Fox News look biased in not giving the imam the same amount of time to speak as the others.
David says
My view is we need to do the opposite of what Obama proposes. In the eyes of the Islamic State, it doesn’t matter why we left Vietnam and Iraq. In their eyes, we left because we are cowards. In their eyes, we are a nation in decline. In their eyes, they will beat us because their will is stronger than ours. The Islamic State believes we will fold if we can’t get our Starbucks coffee or our internet reception. It is a view similar to that of Adolph Hitler. They don’t care about their people dying and we do. That is what they see as their advantage. They see us as week. If we don’t limit Islamic immigration, because we are afraid of backlash, we are just playing into their hands.