• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Denmark: Girl faces charges for protecting herself against sexual attack

Jan 27, 2016 10:25 am By Robert Spencer

Why don’t they just install a Muslim migrant as Prime Minister and declare their willingness to submit and pay the jizya now? Why drag out the process?

Denmark refugees and police

“Outrage in Denmark as 17yo girl faces fine for using pepper spray against sex attacker,” RT, January 27, 2016:

A Danish teenager who said she was sexually assaulted now faces a fine for using pepper spray against her attacker. The man who pulled her to the ground and tried to undress her fled the scene without any charges.

The incident took place in the center of the small town of Sonderborg in southern Denmark at about 10 p.m. local time Wednesday. She told police that an English-speaking man knocked her to the ground, tried to unbutton her pants and undress her.

However, she was apparently able to protect herself as she pulled out pepper spray and used it against the man, who escaped the scene and hasn’t been charged.

Police say that the girl may face a fine.

“It is illegal to possess and use pepper spray, so she will likely be charged for that,” local police spokesman Knud Kirsten said, as cited by TV Syd.

According to The Local, the girl’s fine could be about 500 kroner ($72) and that has sparked outrage on social media.

Readers of the story on TV Syd’s website said they were ready to pay the girl’s fine.

“It is so completely and terribly wrong with the Danish system… Self-defense is a human right,” wrote one user, while another ironically added: “Perhaps the offender must seek compensation…Have we become mad in Denmark?”…

Yes, quite mad.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Denmark, dhimmitude, Eurabia, Featured Tagged With: pepper spray, Sonderborg


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Lucy says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:32 am

    you know what they say, better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6. I bet cash money all the Danes are buying pepper spray.

    • Jeff says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 3:58 pm

      Did anyone notice , the police are also Muslim. what else do you expect ?

    • Katnis says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 8:22 pm

      GOOD FOR HER for defending herself. She was prepared for the inevitable and was able to do what she needed to do. That’s called being smart, proactive, and responsible.

      I am proud of her and hope many other danish women are able to get their hands on pepper spray (or something even more potent) to defend themselves.

      Shame on the police for not protecting its citizens, and shame on Denmark for putting their citizens in this position in the first place.

      • bernie says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 10:40 pm

        Not just that, but also train in the martial arts: Karate, Taekwondo, Kung Fu, Judo, Jiu-Jitsu, Arnis/Escrima, Krav Maga, Thai kickboxing, mixed martial arts…anything is good. Just don’t half-arse the training. “Practice makes perfect.”

        • Arthur says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 12:27 am

          Or Aikido!

    • Paul says

      Feb 5, 2016 at 10:52 am

      You can’t very well rely on being “judged by 12” in countries that don’t have the jury system. Or a Constitution

  2. mortimer says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:38 am

    Cultural Marxists have decided that the population of Europe must be replaced with ‘noble savage’…except the savages are merely savage. Cultural Marxists have placed their ‘pets’ above criticism. The Muslims are being exploited to act as termites or as an excuse to destroy European culture. On their part, Muslims have always used rape as a part of jihad to humiliate and demoralize the host country they invade.

    Cultural Marxists look the other way as the rapes occur. Police are instructed to go easy on the Muslim savages and so the savages are encouraged to be bolder. News has come out that the German government even erased camera evidence of rapes in Cologne.

    European governments are the enemies of the indigenous Europeans whose hands are tied and freedom of expression removed so they may not fight back.

  3. Mark says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 am

    I wish the can of spray had a marking agent in it so as to mark this muslem scum for life. A slow working acid would not be 2 cruel for islamic sick minded ppl

    • خَليفة says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:38 am

      Maybe now is the time to manufacture the anti-rape harpoon. Back in 1970’s someone proposed a vaginal insert which had a barbed harpoon inside so that any penetrating penis would get scewered and hooked and need surgery. The device would come out attached to invading penis. I’ve got one improvement – a poison tip to paralyze the perp.

      • Oppressaphobe says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 8:32 am

        Hey, it may only take one incident of that to stop all rape! That’s what I call a deterrent.

      • Bukkdem Jizheads says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 10:25 am

        The RapeX was invented in 2005 by a Sonette Ehlers, a woman, to protect South African girls from being raped. According to Snopes it never came to market. Some doubters feared it would increase the victim’s chances of being slaughtered.

        I like the idea of distributing red spray paint to women, so even the gropers can be identified punished. They need some kind of tube system so a simple pinch can blast the paint without fumbling for a can.

  4. Mike says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:43 am

    Whilst next door in Sweden the police chief sympathizes with the killer of that refugee worker this week. The world is going crazy !

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3419094/Who-knows-horrors-Police-chief-sparks-anger-sympathising-Somali-boy-stabbed-refugee-worker.html

    • eduardo odraude says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 12:53 pm

      Is it crazy? Or cowardly? Often I think it’s more of the latter than the former. Then again, there’s a third option. Ignorance is always popular.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 2:30 pm

      Oh my God, Mike–this is *sickening*. For this to come from *the police* is especially appalling–sympathy for a murderer of a young woman at a refugee center who was there to help him.

      And he is not the only one–Marie Osth Karlsson, a senior local government commissioner, said: ‘I also have to express sympathy for the man behind the crime, there is also a person behind it’

      The Swedish Prime Minister was spewing dhimmitide, as well.

      The *only* good thing is that many are outraged by this sickening dhimmitude. Here’s one response to Eliasson:

      Jenny Sundelin wrote on Twitter: ‘I vomit when I see you. You are supposed to be the person most responsible for our safety and you defend those who murder us’

      By the way, the victim was a Lebanese Christian–Muslims are not content with murdering them back in Dar-al-Islam.

    • Aron says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 12:21 am

      THE MEDIA ALSO INVENTS A COCK AND BULL STORY INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING THE POLICE VERSION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND POSSIBLE ACCOMPLICES TO HER MURDER

      If such a murder ever happened in a hypothetical ‘center’, say an ‘office premise’ run by a ‘Far Right’ party- would the media buy readily into ‘the Heroes who pinned the killer down’?

      You would atleast see Media asking some hard questions isnt it?

      1. To what extent the Ideology and mind set of inmates caused the murder of the young lady worker?

      2. was there an attempt to gang rape her?

      3. Was the boy a Fall Guy and other accomplices simply exonerated themselves of gang rape attempt she might have resisted that lead to her murder?

      4. How far is Police invested with keeping up a positive Image for the far Right and its members there?

      Instead they say this-

      We are very grateful for these kinds of actions.’

      GRATEFUL FOR THESE KIND OF HAPPENINGS THAT REQUIRE SUCH ‘ACTIONS’ THAT ARENT ESTABLISHED YET AS THE REAL HAPPENING AT ALL?

      What Investigation was done to accept the boys version of what they say was what really happened??

      The Cops say an incredibly silly and incredulous story-

      “was stabbed to death when an argument broke out at the center for underage unaccompanied refugees. ”

      AN ARGUMENT? OR AN ATTEMPT TOP RAPE AND HER BRAVE BUT RESISTANCE?

      “Teenage killer was overpowered by other children living at the centre”…

      Note the deliberate stress on ‘Children’ to defray suspicions about any ‘accomplices’ or liars?

      “Detectives were at the migrant centre which houses children aged 14-17 searching for clues. Police today praised two hero teenagers who held the knifeman down until they arrived”

      Well, what ‘Clues’ after you have readily Prased the boys’ version and made Two heroes’ instantly of possible accomplices to a Gang Rape attempt and Murder?

      ‘When they entered the crime scene they found him on the floor being held by these two boys.
      ‘They had over-powered him and probably saved the lives of others.
      ‘It is fair to say that they were really brave and courageous in their actions.
      ‘We found what we think is the murder weapon laying beside them.’

      Can anyone come up imaging a more Incompetent Police force than Swedes?

      Swedish police have today praised the actions of the other children living in the facility, hailing them ‘heroes’ after they overpowered the boy after he attacked Miss Mezher.
      ‘Two boys held him down. It is a very good intervention. Had he intended to hurt anyone else, then they have prevented that,’ said police spokesperson Peter Adlersson.
      ‘It is easy to become injured yourself when intervening in this kind of situation. We are very grateful for these kinds of actions.’

      And an equally culpable media writes in very next lines this-

      ”
      Neighbourhood-watch groups have reportedly been sent out to prevent teenage girls from being sexually harassed on their way home from the commuter trains from Gothenburg.
      Parents have also spoken out against having their children in the same classes as the immigrants.
      We are very grateful for these kinds of actions.’

      WE ARE GRATEFUL THAT SUCH DARLINGS ARE HERE WITH US….

      SICK SWEDEN

  5. ICH says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:46 am

    PERFECT OPPORTUNITY to ram this down everyones throat.

    DONT DROP THIS…Push it !!

  6. JMD says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:55 am

    How do we know the assailant was Muslim? The story reports only that he spoke English.

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:32 am

      The original stories (ex. http://www.thelocal.dk/20160126/danish-teen-fought-off-her-attacker-with-pepper-spray-now-shell-face-fine) describe him as a “dark-skinned english=speaking man” and mentions recent cases of sexual harassment of Sonderborg women by Muslim refugees. That doesn’t prove it but it would be a reasonable assumption. The bigger issue is the right of women to self-defense at all at a time they are being assaulted all over Europe in a Muslim rape jihad…and why that was allowed to happen in the first place.

      “Sexual assaults have been in the news in Sønderborg recently after several women in the town reported earlier this month that they sometimes feel harassed by the aggressive behaviour of some male asylum seekers and refugees at the local asylum centre.

      “It is not known, however, if the assailant in this latest incident was an asylum seeker or refugee.

      “The case has sparked a backlash among some Danes who point to increasing reports of sexual harassment in Sønderborg and other Danish cities at the same time that police say they are stretched too thin to properly carry out their duties.”

      Police can’t protect them. They aren’t allowed to protect themselves. Sonderborg’s men, AWOL.

    • More Ham Ed says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 12:11 am

      Oh, I forgot, we all just jump the gun here and all muslims are bad, oh, not all, only 400 million of them firmly believe in the death penalty for leaving islam, and the other 999 million think the unholy ko ‘ran (warguide) is a “holy” book.

      http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia

      27698 Deadly ISLAMIC Terror Attacks Since 9/11

      http://www.thereligionofpeace.com

      More ham.

  7. Muhammad Bear says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 11:05 am

    The right to self defense is innate. It is part of one’s humanity.

    It is not a right that can be granted by government Nor is it a right that can be taken away by any government.

    In fact government has no say on one’s right to defend themselves by any means.

    • Myxlplik says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 1:10 pm

      Your post reminds me of the American Declaration of Indepndence, the upper third before it gets into the indictment of King George.

    • RonaldB says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 1:25 pm

      Well, we’re looking at “natural rights” and then we’re looking at “practical rights”.

      A “natural right” is granted by means of a philosophy of government or individual liberty, and recognized by the government.

      A “practical right” is a right granted by the government, and withdrawn at the will of the government.

      In point of fact, there are two strong currents driving West European governments:

      One is simply expedience: it is far easier and safer to enforce laws against law-abiding citizens than against sociopathic criminals (migrants). The police show some justification for the salaries they draw by showing an arrest and conviction record, even if the record is against a 16-year old girl fighting a rapist. The police keep their jobs and stay out of the hospital or morgue. Wouldn’t that be an incentive for you?

      The second current is socialism. The basic requirement of socialism is a docile population, willing to cede control of their personal lives and resources to the government, and happy with whatever favors the government throws back their way. The big problem with armed individuals is not that they’re likely to shoot back at the government, but that having the means of independent self-defense, they begin to value taking control of their own lives.

      Also, the police and politicians often have complex relationships with street gangs, but often the street gangs serve as a deniable source of intimidation of political opposition. In Rotherham England, the police actually arrested the father of a girl who confronted the groomer of his daughter. Also, there have been some reports by some of the victims that the police actually were on good terms with the groomers.

      An armed populace is not really effective against government forces, but well able to defend itself against street gangs. This is another reason why the proto-fascist governments of Western Europe are so strong against any personal defense.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:22 pm

      I suppose you can defend yourself but not with any weapon. So this girl was supposed to overpower this monster with her bare hands.
      What if she was a karate expert? Would that be considered a weapon?
      Maybe they should carry a can of bug spray and use it. Surely that would damage his eyes as well and it’s perfectly legal.

  8. Jaladhi says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 am

    So there is no right of self defense in Denmark?? Jut submit to the rapists and murderers – wonder if Vikings were the ancestors of present day Danes!!

  9. Manual Paleologos says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 am

    They voted in the government that keeps them helpless and refuses to protect them. They invited those people into their country. Their circus. Their monkeys. Until they decide to change their government, I hope they enjoy being raped.

    When their country implodes, we must absolutely seal our borders against European refugees. Let them stay home and fight or die. Euronate on them. We don’t want their disease, here. We have enough of their kind already.

    • Myxlplik says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 1:22 pm

      What a horrible thing to say. I understand your frustration, but Europe is under the bond of a fascist tyranny. The people of Europe do not want this, anymore than we do, I’d review what it means to be an American and stand on the side of Liberty.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 7:19 pm

        Actually many Europeans still want this very much. Every time a protest is organized against Muslim immigration (invasion) more protesters turn up on the other side and clash with sane people.
        Same thing happens in Australia. No sooner there is a protest, out crawl all the slithering reptiles ready to start trouble and have the sane people get a bad image. They start calling the protestors right wing extremists. There is usually more of the reptiles than protestors.
        I think the same ratio of sane and insane is in Europe as well.
        So if majority of people are against Muslims how come there is alwasy more protesting on the other side?

        • Myxlplik says

          Jan 27, 2016 at 8:11 pm

          Peggy,

          This protest disparity certainly is an interesting phenomena, because when you go onto the Daily Mail etc. the comment section is virtually dominated by folks who don’t like Islam, or want Muslims around for that matter. This is just my opinion, so I have no scientific data to back this up, but I think the vast majority of folks (such as those represented on comment sections) are common working folk who don’t really have a lot of time to show up for protests. On the other hand the reptiles you speak of (typically on the dole of the working folk) have plenty of time to show up to every event & there is an alliance between Leftists & Muslims, like we saw in Calais (who obviously have nothing better to do than to run riot). So the reptilian counter protest consists of mostly unemployed people, and Muslims who feel very threatened by a group of people who may want conservative austerity and balanced budgets, or a sense of cultural Nationalism against Muslims. The slackers on the Left really feel like their livelyhood and sense of security Big Government gives them, Muslims also being on the dole in Europe feel threatened, and also are intimidated by the host culture flexing its identity, so both of these groups feel threatened by a change towards a more conservative governance. On the other hand, I don’t think until most recently the silent majority has actually felt very threatened, so they have lacked the motivation and time to roll out in large numbers. I think the conservative elements, from what I’ve seen in the most recent elections in France (for example) will need to ally with the middle to gain seats. Seems like Europe is split into 3rds, 33% conservative culturalists, 33% in the middle, and 33% which would include Muslims and hard left communists.

        • Myxlplik says

          Jan 27, 2016 at 8:28 pm

          Anyways, there’s an inherent flaw in democracy which has been around since Plato. People sell their freedom for goodies and handouts, which corrupt governments are all too eager to “redistribute” for votes.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 8:35 pm

        Myxlpik said:

        “This is just my opinion, so I have no scientific data to back this up, but I think the vast majority of folks (such as those represented on comment sections) are common working folk who don’t really have a lot of time to show up for protests. On the other hand the reptiles you speak of (typically on the dole of the working folk) have plenty of time to show up to every event & there is an alliance between Leftists & Muslims, like we saw in Calais (who obviously have nothing better to do than to run riot)”
        ======================
        That makes sense.
        We, ordinary hard working people just don’t have the time or energy to go out and protest, especially if it’s during the week.
        There must be another way to make our voices heard. I wonder just how much petitions are considered seriously.
        .

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 3:04 am

          Yes, I agree, Myxplk has a point.

          Re making voices heard. Persons experienced in the art of lobbying know that an individual, signed letter, on paper, sent by post, carries more weight than a signature on a petition. And probably more weight than an email. Phone-calls are sometimes useful, but you have to know *exaclty* what you want to say, and be careful about your tone; and you have to think ‘on the fly’, whereas with a letter you can think about what you’re writing, and rewrite till you’re satisfied with it.

          If ever one signs a petition about something, one should also write a specific, in-your-own-words letter to the relevant Authority, on the same subject.

          Those among us who aren’t able to drop everything and attend protest rallies need to be very disciplined and regular about letter-writing. Our pollies need to be getting thousands of letters, every week, every month, and all of those letters expressing intelligent alarm about Islam.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 4:17 pm

      We’re headed down this same path. I don’t think we can afford to sneer at Europeans.

    • simpleton1 says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:03 pm

      Absolutely right, even if seems harsh,
      In the old days quarantine was practiced and only when sad to say the survivors were proven recovered and the dead buried, and no new cases, then the quarantine was lifted.

      When you get inculcated in sociologist university trained population that fear their country is going to the dogs, because there is a rise of people opposed to immigration, that want to stop immigration and hold firm to their culture, that is the ones that do silent good marches, that are decried by their leaders like Hollande, Merkel and Cameron.
      They are the righteous ones as they call “ugly” this slowly learning silent majority and so wish to flee this uglyness, as they now feel very squeamish.

      Tell me what have they learnt. They only want to philosophize in your country about great further immigration and multiculturalism, and fervently say it should have been done better, and that this time do not repeat the mistake of letting that “right wing” speak out their “hate”.

      I have meet many young Euro back packers and many blame problems, on their government in not sorting out the problem with the “racist” intolerant, with nazi leaders, unruly rabble opposition that will not let the new people settle in.

      The ones I would welcome the most are the leaders of EDL, and PEGIDA, but they all want to stand and make peaceful (while they can) issue with their governments to change their immigration policies.
      That is the moribund bureaucratic governing elite that connect with many European society/clubs that have as a basis on the Couldenhove Kalergi philosophy.

      You do not mix with leprosy, unless you know and have the medical skills and medicines to treat those patients, and which will ultimately if needed to be able to treat yourself and your own family and community.
      I have great respect for the missionaries that went out to help the ones to make life more bearable with leprosy, but they did not bring them back to general society.
      Only now drugs are freely available, and within 2 weeks of treatment are no longer infectious,so that contagion is so very controllable.

      Have we got the medical skills to safeguard from the mild but ultimate very infectious multicultural sociological disease.

  10. خَليفة says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 11:27 am

    May seem off subject, but it comes clear…

    Cross-species sexual attraction. Metaphorically used in many movies. e.g. King Kong – two basic interpretations: 1-women being insecure want a strong, sensitive brute that will do anything to protect them, 2-brutish men want beautiful, cultured woman to refine them.

    Now, in reality, if you had a dog which was more interested in having sex with cats than with dogs you would say there is something wrong with that dog. If you read a news about a guy that was more interested in having sex with animals or prostitutes than with his wife you would also say there is something wrong with that guy.

    If prostitution were legalized do you think good church, temple, synagogue going folk would start using such services? Some might, but I think most would not. A person who does not believe in prostitution would not do it just because it’s legal, they would not do it because they have a moral repulsion to the idea of it. Just like normal people have a repulsion to the idea of having sex with animals, children and relatives and dead people. That repulsion is a built in thing, but things can go wrong thru abuse or brainwashing to make people deviants.

    In the USA past it was illegal for inter racial marriage. Why? Because there were many people who found the idea of having sex with a black person repulsive. Blacks were considers sub-human, and having sex with them would be akin to sex with animals, the idea of which they considered repulsive.

    Muslims consider the kuffar ( all the non Muslims ) to be sub-human, filthy and the vilest of creatures. And yet they feel compelled to have sex with them and keep them as sex slaves.

    One would suppose a truly pious Christian would be faithful to his wife and not use prostitutes and not want sex slaves.

    Why is it that a pious Muslim enjoys raping the vilest of creatures over finding a pious Muslima to be his wife? Well as you would conclude, there is something wrong with that Muslim.

    • Kepha says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:43 am

      Dear Mr. Arabic Script: Stop raising the “inter-racial marriage used to be taboo” meme. Sure, we had those anti-miscegenation laws in a lot of the USA, but they got passed in the early 19th century with the ascendancy of the slave-holding class; they were not part and parcel of the ancient legal traditions of Western Christendom. The purpose was to prevent manumission through marriage and the assimilation of a free black population in order to keep the line between owner and property clear.

      While the laws might have been there, there were always plenty of white Americans (and British, and members of other slave-holding nations) who recognized the humanity of the blacks and sought to either ameliorate the condition of slaves or abolish slavery. For instance, in 1700, Samuel Sewall, infamous as one of the judges in the Salem witchcraft trials, wrote a book entitled _The Selling of Joseph_, in which he castigates the enslavement, buying, and selling of Africans. His thinking was not “enlightenment” at all, but rooted very much in the orthodox Puritanism to which he adhered. throughout his life.

      As for finding sex with a black person repulsive, just look at how much white ancestry the average Old-line African-American (as opposed to someone descended from later African immigrants) carries. Show me a pure-bred African-American, and I’ll show you an American-born kid with two parents from Ghana, Nigeria, or Cameroon.

      What we have with the Muslim rape epidemic is simply proof that you don’t need “hate speech” to make Islam look pretty repulsive.

      BTW, I hope that Danish girl gets off and that her case leads Denmark to reconsider the importance of legal self-defense.

      • خَليفة says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 12:15 pm

        خَليفة = caliph

        You missed my point – normal people don’t have sex with something they find repulsive,

        Muslims say the kuffar are sub-human and the vilest of creatures, worthy of Allah’s hatred, and yet, Muslims want to have sex with them.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 27, 2016 at 4:22 pm

          That’s because Muslims are not having sex with Infidels because they esteem them as a romantic or even sexual ideal–instead, Muslims are raping Infidels *to humiliate them*.

        • خَليفة says

          Jan 27, 2016 at 8:00 pm

          gravenimage

          Exactly, Yes,Muslims are not “normal” even by the lowest western standards.

      • خَليفة says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 12:18 pm

        Notice how I say “they considered”

    • Jack Diamond says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:44 am

      Who else are they going to have as sex slaves or rape? They are not only “war booty” it is a way to humiliate kuffar women and, especially, their men, by showing the dominance of the Muslim male. He can do that and keep his pious Muslima wife too. Muhammad said so and did so. That’s why the ISIS rapist told the Yazidi girl that he was doing worship, when first he prayed and then he raped her.

      • Jack Diamond says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 12:59 pm

        Social media is full of Muslims posting highly provocative posters of scantily dressed very young kuffar beauties in Europe, calling them sluts for Muslim to help themselves to. That the kuffar is “repulsive” does not mean the women are not sexually attractive to them. Quite the opposite. Repulsive is the preamble to dehumanizing and objectifying the victim so they can be raped with no crisis of conscience. No one said Islam makes men act “normal.”

    • Shapleigh says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 12:01 pm

      Yeah, whatever, I think that these Danes are going to be reading up more on their Viking past, and what it meant to survive and thrive in the Middle Ages. The Muslims back then found the Vikings to be dirty barbarian sub humans, but they, though brutal as they were, built a more civilized culture out of it. One has to realize what is needed sometimes to survive.

    • Mr Twister says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 6:14 am

      Polygamy.

  11. Angemon says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 12:03 pm

    A Danish teenager who said she was sexually assaulted now faces a fine for using pepper spray against her attacker.

    Let’s face it: we all knew something like this would happen sooner or later. A native European would defend themselves from an attack and stand trial for it. I’m just surprised that the accusation is possession and use of an illegal weapon rather than a hate-crime.

    The man who pulled her to the ground and tried to undress her fled the scene without any charges.

    Was he caught?

    Police say that the girl may face a fine.

    “It is illegal to possess and use pepper spray, so she will likely be charged for that,” local police spokesman Knud Kirsten said, as cited by TV Syd.

    Let me guess: “if everyone is disarmed there will be no crime”.

    According to The Local, the girl’s fine could be about 500 kroner ($72) and that has sparked outrage on social media.

    Readers of the story on TV Syd’s website said they were ready to pay the girl’s fine.

    Good to know not everyone is drinking the kool-aid.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 7:28 pm

      They must know who this creature is because they are going to charge her with a crime. So they have to have a victim for that crime.
      Why isn’t he getting charged for attempted rape? That’s the first thing her lawyer should ask. Those kind people who are prepared to pay her fine mean well but doesn’t that legitimize the charge then? Maybe they should be putting money into her defending the charges and challenging that law. Every woman who keeps something to defend herself with will find herself being charged from now on.
      This has to be challenged and not just fines paid.

  12. gravenimage says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 12:27 pm

    Denmark: Girl faces charges for protecting herself against sexual attack
    ………………………………

    *Sickening*. Danish police haven’t caught the attacker, but are charging *the victim*.

    This is, in fact, exactly what happens in Dar-al-Islam–although the victim there, of course, faces rather more than a fine:

    “Amnesty International: “Woman” stoned to death in Somalia was 13-year-old rape victim”

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/amnesty-international-woman-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-was-13-year-old-rape-victim

    How long will it be before victims don’t even report their attacks, if they know authorities won’t do anything but further victimize them?

    And these attacks *will* escalate, given the influx of Muslim rapefugees.

    The *only* good sign is that European girls are *fighting back*–whether the dhimmi authorities like it or not.

    That so many have come forward to pay this girl’s fine bodes well.

    And there will be many more like this Danish girl–women all over Europe are arming themselves with guns and pepper spray, whether self defense is deemed legal or not:

    “Germany Sells Out Of Pepper Spray As ‘Frightened Germans Buy Protection Against Refugees’”

    http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/11/germany-sells-out-of-pepper-spray-as-frightened-germans-buy-protection-against-refugees/

  13. eduardo odraude says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 12:48 pm

    The law should be fined (if that were possible), not the victim. If the Danish state cannot protect its people from rape jihad, fine the politicians and elect new ones. Insist that the politicians live in Muslim areas and go about without bodyguards, as the average citizen must do. Then let’s see what happens to such laws.

  14. Bill says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 1:23 pm

    Regardless of the ethnicity or religion of the attacker, it is simply preposterous that a woman cannot defend herself against a rape without fear of committing the “crime” of self defense. She should be legally justified to use lethal force to defend against such an assault and be effectively prepared to offer such a defense as a practical matter. Europe is hopeless because the civilian population has submitted to being disarmed and forced into virtual victimhood and servitude. This Danish woman sought to defend herself and did so. Good for her. That is her duty to herself as a free person. I read women coming forward and speaking out against this intolerable situation. I read critics saying that feminist women are letting women down in not speaking out against the rape crisis. While that is true, what I do not read is European men speaking out, and meaningfully acting, in defense of their own mothers, sisters, daughters and wives. I think I read one article about men banding together to provide a watch and were quickly labeled “vigilantes”, “racists” and then shut down by the police with the enthusiastic support of the political elite and their media mouthpieces. The police, instead of protecting their citizens’ mothers, daughters, sisters and wives, are enabling the crisis and are only protecting the political elites who caused it to happen and suffer it to exist (the elites being all safely tucked away in their guarded sanctuaries). The police are truly pathetic. They cover up the atrocities, empathize with the rapists and criminals. When confronted, well, do nothing or they run away and whine that they need more government paid losers to add to their numbers in dishonorable retreat. Real men are the true extinct species in Western Europe and the invaders know it.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 4:56 pm

      Bill wrote:

      what I do not read is European men speaking out, and meaningfully acting, in defense of their own mothers, sisters, daughters and wives.
      …………………………..

      Actually, there *were* a few men in Cologne and other European cities who protected women on NYE. Several of them were sent to the hospital by the Muslim mob.

      Here’s one boy who defended a girl–but he paid a heavy price at the hands of Muslim barbarians:

      “Sweden: Muslim migrant kills teen who was protecting girl from sex assault”

      http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/sweden-muslim-migrant-kills-teen-who-was-protecting-girl-from-sex-assault

      Infidel men will probably have to band together to protect women. Here’s “‘Dusseldorf is Watching”:

      “German vigilante group vows to protect women from migrant attackers…”

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3390042/The-fightback-begins-German-vigilante-group-vows-protect-women-migrant-attackers-three-Syrians-arrested-gang-raping-two-teenage-girls.html

      Of course, dhimmi German authorities are denigrating these good men as “vigilantes”. But they already have 8,000 members on Facebook, and are opening another branch in Stuttgart.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 5:09 pm

        One more thing: read the comments on the Daily Mail article. The posts are pretty much universally in support of this “vigilante” group, and they recognize the danger from these “refugees”.

        They may not all understand that it is Islam that lies behind these assaults, but they understand that this invasion of Europe is *very* bad news.

      • Bill says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 9:59 pm

        Thank you. There needs to be more of this organized activity. Not surprising that the media elites are not reporting this movement. They want no part of it. They want their citizens to be docile and compliant victims and wards of the state.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 27, 2016 at 10:17 pm

          Agreed, Bill–although the Daily Mail is pretty mainstream. Despite their denigration of protectors as “vigilantes”, most of those commenting don’t appear to buy it.

        • Rufolino says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 4:35 am

          By indicting for some reason the female who was molested, the police are (apparently) enforcing the law as it stands in Denmark.

          Despite the heinous attack, she did something which (apparently) contravenes current law.

          One assumes the police are naturally obliged to enforce Denmark’s laws -so it seems clear enough that the law is at fault here.

          Maybe such an outrageous case will prompt the government to alter the law in circumstances like this. The current law is failing the victim badly.

  15. Aisha says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 1:58 pm

    An axe. It’s not illegal to possess an axe. Defending herself with an axe – that would have been better, right?

    • Bill says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 10:06 pm

      From the very narrow standpoint of her not being charged with the “crime” of using pepper spray, the answer to your question is “yes”. I think that was your whole point in any case. From a practical self defense standpoint, an axe is not really a good option to defend against this kind of an attack. I give her credit for having the presence of mind to deploy the pepper spray in the shock of the moment. Of course, compared to pepper spray she would have even been better equipped with a Glock. They make those in Europe don’t they? I know they were invented there.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 10:26 pm

      That might be a bit too heavy to lug around but a can of insect spray might be just right. Insect spray is toxic so spraying it in someone’e eyes will do some damage and it’s perfectly legal to carry it.
      You can get concentrated spray in small cans.
      Wonder if tazers are legal in Europe.

      • bernie says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48 pm

        You can also make a spicy, stinging spray out of a mix of curry power and water, and put in in a spray bottle.

  16. citycat says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 2:26 pm

    I wonder, if everybody had a pepper spray would would they then arrest everybody.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 10:27 pm

      No, just the victims of attempted rape.

  17. SpiritOf1683 says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 3:11 pm

    If anything is going to facilitate the creation of Tom Kratman’s Eurabian dystopia in Caliphate, this is one of them. It seems Eurabia will come about 50 years earlier than depicted in that book.

  18. somehistory says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 3:48 pm

    Do the homes there have wasps? Wasp spray is not an illegal possession, is it?

  19. Jack Diamond says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 4:44 pm

    No but it is a federal offense (USA) to use pesticides other than for intended purposes, wasp spray is a poison. It also would have been less likely to stop the attacker unless it got in his eyes. I’m all for her using anything, including a gun, to protect herself, legally or illegally, but using wasp spray on him would not be any more legal than using the illegal pepper spray. Pepper spray is legal in all 50 states in the U.S.

    • somehistory says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:33 pm

      My point was that she couldn’t have been charged with *possession* as she was with the pepper spray.
      Did she file a complaint? Did someone else file a complaint? Did someone report her for having the spray? They didn’t catch the criminal, so how did they find out she had the spray in the first place in order to charge her?

      If she was just walking along carrying…anything not illegal to carry…a bat, a pocket knife, a can of anything legal…and defended herself, then she would not be charged with *illegal possession.*

      And she would not have been charged with *illegal possession* if in the States, so that doesn’t matter that using bug spray would be illegal in the U.S. If someone uses bug spray they just happen to be carrying home for use against pests and are attacked, they can plead self defense.

      She and others like her should learn how to use a cupped hand over the ear…hands are legal everywhere and the cupped hand over the ear…if done correctly…can be really effective…and painful. Pain he deserved.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 10:32 pm

      So carrying wasp spray is ok but using it for self defence is illegal?
      How can you be charged for posession of anything not illegal even if you use it to defend yourself?
      I can understand carrying a prohibited item can land you in trouble but not bug spray. So if you use a rock to hit your atacker with are you going to be charged with posession of illegal item?
      If it’s legal to defend yourself how can it be illegal if you use an item which is not illegal?
      Too much here left for interpretation and I really think that a judge would throw out the case.

      • Jack Diamond says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 12:53 am

        Yes, technically, wasp spray is legal to use on bugs, not legal to use on people. No, I can’t imagine someone getting actually charged for using wasp spray to defend themselves from rape. Self-defense is a “mitigating circumstance” to say the least. Still, it is illegal to misuse bug spray as it was illegal to possess and use pepper spray, if you put the letter of the law above common sense or the protection of women. Which Denmark is doing. The girl had the right to protect herself any way she could with whatever she could, including putting a bullet between his eyes. My only point, and it is a small one, was that if they are going to fine her for using pepper spray, as if she were the criminal here, she would as likely be fined for misusing wasp spray. But the only thing that matters is that it worked and she saved herself.

        • Pegy says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 11:02 pm

          Police can exercise discression and choose not to charge her. That would be the best outcome.
          If they did charge her I doubt she would have much trouble getting that charge thrown out of court.

  20. Ed Lee says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:12 pm

    The concept that personal self defense is a basic human right has been brought up several times. I agree completely. But, everyone needs to know that the United Nations Human Rights Council has declared in official documents that there is no human right to self-defense, and they preach this doctrine around the world.

    • Oppressaphobe says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 8:54 am

      What?!

      Are you talking about, like Israel, trying to defend itself from Pal attacks?

      This is an interesting statement and something I’ve never even thought about. I’d like to hear more about this because this is at the heart of everything wrong with the world today.

      I DESPISE THE UNITED NATIONS AND THINK IT SHOULD BE TURNED INTO HOMES FOR SENIOR CITIZENS.

  21. Cthulhu says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 6:12 pm

    My friend from Germany told me today that it is illegal there to use it against humans. The fine for using it is 500€. I told her to buy it and use it in case of attack and make it worth those 500€. It’s not a high price to hear those towlheads squeal like a pig.

    • Paul says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:52 pm

      That’s OK then: these scum are not human.

  22. abad says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 7:39 pm

    Denmark needs to round up and deport every single Muslim living in their country.

  23. Dave J says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 8:24 pm

    If self defense is illegal and you can be arrested for quoting Churchill then Orwell’s 1984 is fully here, complete with the predicted “Doublethink”, where black is white and evil is good. And Islam is “The Religion of Peace”.

    Women and children are only the first victims of this invasion, the men will follow, unless strong measures are taken. As the first victims there is a chance that European women will rise up first, start carrying that pepper spray or electroshock device in defiance of their pansy police forces and administer some stern lessons to the would-be rapists. Perhaps it will encourage the men, including the gay men who are equally endangered, to step up to their civil and moral duties.

    What’s wrong with these guys, don’t they have any gun stores? Oh, right.

  24. Matthieu Baudin says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:48 pm

    “…’It is so completely and terribly wrong with the Danish system… Self-defense is a human right,’ wrote one user, while another ironically added: ‘Perhaps the offender must seek compensation…Have we become mad in Denmark?’…”

    Let someone pay the fine. It really doesn’t matter. The real problem here is that the larger issue is being allowed, once again, to slip off the radar; it doesn’t matter if there is a small fine for carrying pepper spray, keep the regulation, the bigger issue, the one that this little ‘shock horror’ story is avoiding, is that she is one of many recent victims following the mass flood of aggressive sexually malevolent middle eastern refugee immigrants, a tide that the Danish Government is either unable or unwilling to stop.

  25. Marty says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 4:53 am

    A perfect microcosm of the Destruction of the West.
    Most EU countries, & the, soon to be ex EU, Britain, will
    soon be islamic.
    It’s down to demographics, & groveling, Western hating leftists.

  26. Oppressaphobe says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 8:39 am

    Hey,
    Does anybody know what the injuries were to the worker “stabbed in the neck”?

    Usually stabbing occurs where there is body mass, chest, abdomen, etc…

    How do you repeatedly stab someone in the neck?

    Was this an attempt to behead her? Even if not, they seemed to want to go for the throat, so to speak.

    And these two that held the perp back? Well obviously not-she died so I would be suspect of any so-called attempt to come to her aid.

    • Oppressaphobe says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 8:42 am

      Remember Behghazi, when one of the first things we heard reportedly, not know much of anything that was going on, was that some muslims brought our ambassador to the hospital, but unfortunately it was too late?

      Same deal here, no doubt.

      This is standard operating procedure. We hardly knew anything about what was going down in Benghazi, but that report surfaced very early, that some of those great muslim people had really tried to save our ambassador–may he rest in peace.

  27. Oppressaphobe says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 8:48 am

    It becomes more important every day to be able to think clearly and not get pulled into the quagmire of llies and distortion.

    Question everything you hear and speak up constantly. The Danes have apparently let their freedom of speech, freedom to defend themselves, go to pot (literally?).

    They wouldn’t have lost their freedoms if they had been guarding it. So apparently apathy is the most dangerous feeling of all.

    Moral of the story: don’t be apathetic but be observant and protective, and willing to fight for your freedom.

    Don’t believe anything they say—lies have become the NORM.

  28. David says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 9:46 am

    This just sounds like INSANITY! What loony toon, in what CARTOON thought this up? A teenage girl DEFENDS HERSELF from a rapist AND SHE IS THE CRIMINAL???
    These people who want her charged must be absolutely NUTZ!
    Even if it was illegal to have/use the pepper spray. (and that law must be changed immediately! ) no COP or prosecutors with a working BRAIN wound even consider charging THE VICTIM.

    • Myxlplik says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 5:18 pm

      I was wonder if it’s okay to tar and feather cops and judges who do this sort of thing

  29. Roland Scialom says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 12:30 pm

    And what do the danish voters think about this? If something is wrong in the danish law, it is up to the danish voters to fix this with their representatives in the parliament.

  30. LR says

    Feb 3, 2016 at 3:49 pm

    I really like the idea of having a pepper spray with a dye in it that would last quite a long time without being easily washed off. Would mark a rapist, and make him easier to catch. I would think there is something like that on the way.

    How are the women suppose to protect themselves if they can’t even have pepper spray?

    Had no idea the women could not even have pepper spray. How stupid.

    I’ll bet that’s going to change soon.

    • LR says

      Feb 3, 2016 at 4:06 pm

      Of course they have it.

      For anyone wanting the stuff, can I post a link here? If you happen to be browsing by…

      http://www.womenonguard.com/pepper-spray

  31. Kenneth says

    Mar 9, 2016 at 3:05 am

    You need to put this in perspective for a moment.

    They were both breaking the law. His attempted rape is admittedly much worse, but it doesn’t justify that she is breaking the law by being armed. In Denmark being armed is strictly prohibited, no party was favoured, not the girl, not the attempted rapist.

    You think they were shaming her or something? They were probably thankful for her being able to defend herself, but being armed is STILL against the law.

    There are much fewer pistols and similar weapons in Denmark than you might think. Much fewer than 1/10.000 private citizens own one and they’re not legal at all. Not even police is always carrying one on the job. Knives are more common than that, but also extremely rare and illegal when in public.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Naildriver on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.