• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hugh Fitzgerald: Sticking to the Details

Jan 19, 2016 5:37 pm By Hugh Fitzgerald

cologne-1

Each day brings news of fresh problems — even horrors — that are the result of the Muslim invasion of Europe. Millions of Muslims have been attempting to enter Europe — 1.1 million have managed this year to settle in Germany alone. Many of these migrants are from Syria, and many others pretend to be from Syria. They are all described as “refugees,” a word intended to evoke sympathy and to shut down the critical faculty of those who might dare to question the wisdom of this mass invasion. Most of the migrants are Arabs, but there are also Pakistanis, Afghans, Somalis, that is, assorted Muslims from all over. All of them carry, undeclared in their mental baggage, an ideology that offers a Total Regulation of Life and Compleat Explanation of the Universe. They have been suffused, since childhood, in an ideology that uncompromisingly divides the world into Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, the Lands of the Muslims and the Lands of the Infidels, and a state of permanent war, if not always open warfare, must exist between the two. They are raised up in an ideology that divides mankind in two: the Believers and the Unbelievers, of all kinds. It is the Believers who have a natural right, as the “best of peoples,” to dominate the world, and the Believers have a duty, too, to participate in the struggle, or Jihad against Unbelievers, so that ultimately Islam will everywhere dominate, and Muslims rule, everywhere.

These Muslim migrants have not made things easy for the Infidels in whose lands they have been settling. They have, for example,very different views from non-Muslims on how women should behave and how they should be treated. They find that Western women, in their hijabless state, are akin to “meat” that is on display, there for the taking, by Muslim men. And take they do — which is why more than 70% of those imprisoned for rape in the Scandinavian countries are Muslims, though they make up 2-3% of the population. In Cologne, nearly 500 German women were assaulted by Muslims in a single night. The other night, in Dortmund, there were similar attacks, with a Muslim man insisting that “German girls are just here for sex.” Muslim predators who took advantage of young girls and turned them into sex slaves to service gangs of Muslim men in a dozen British cities and towns were merely showing their contempt for Infidel women, and this to us monstrous behavior did not violate but rather fit their worldview of how Muslims can treat Infidels. And the attacks on Infidel men — just the other day a 15-year-old Lithuanian boy was stabbed to death in Sweden by an Arab enraged that the boy dared to protect a girl that Arab had been molesting — are also part of this story. The frequent attacks on inoffensive Jews by Muslims in France tell us something about the Muslim version of interfaith outreach, as does the mass murder of Christians by Muslims in the Islamic State. And then there are all the Muslim terrorist attacks all over Europe — from the killings of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam, to the bombs at the Madrid subway station of Atocha, to the bombs on the London Underground and London buses, to the mass murder of innocents at a Parisian newspaper office, and cafes, and restaurants, and dance-halls, and kosher grocery stores. What are we to make of all this? Anything? Nothing?

Muslim migrants have nowhere exhibited an interest in learning about, much less conforming to, Western ideas about the equality of the sexes, about the equal treatment of people of all faiths or none, about freedom of speech and conscience. But they are convinced, and do not hide their conviction, that they are in Europe as by right, and cannot, will not be dislodged. To quote Tariq Ramadan, “We are here. We are here to stay. It’s over.” This is the note of triumphalism, of “just you try to get rid of us. We’re not leaving but are going to take over.” And as the Muslims will continue, by hook or crook, to try to enter Europe, and within Europe will try to make it to the countries that offer the most generous benefits, their presence will inevitably change, by sheer force of numbers, the societies within which they settle, but into which they do not integrate. Rather, it is the non-Muslims who are expected to change in order to fit into this new society.

Yet those who sound the alarm are attacked, declared sweepingly to be “Islamophobes,” a word designed to inhibit not only legitimate criticism, but even any tentative investigation of Islam. What, after all, did Donald Trump do that was so beyond the pale? He merely said that we ought to halt Muslim immigration “while we figure out what’s going on.” Do we all know “what is going on”? Clearly we do not all know “what is going on” — after all, we are allowing into our countries large numbers of people who grew up suffused in a faith that teaches them to despise, and to be hostile to, non-Muslims. The refusal to discuss this matter calmly, and to inform oneself appropriately by studying the texts of Islam, and by reading the non-Muslim scholars who devoted their lives to the disinterested study of Islam (C. Snouck Hurgronje, Joseph Schacht, Antoine Fattal, Henri Lammens, K. S. Lal, Ignaz Goldziher, Sir William Muir, St. Clair Tisdall, Arthur Jeffrey, Samuel Zwemer, Georges Vajda, David Margoliouth), the ignoring of the testimony provided by such defectors from Islam as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nonie Darwish, Ibn Warraq, Wafa Sultan, Magdi Allam — this is a colossal dereliction of duty on the part of those who presume to protect and instruct us. Where in the Western world has the Muslim immigration not led to expenses and insecurities and a general civilisational confusion? Those who claim, and are prepared to discuss in detail the evidence supporting this claim, that the large-scale presence of Muslims has led, in Western Europe, to a situation that is far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous for both the indigenous non-Muslims and for other, non-Muslim immigrants, cannot simply be waved away with a contemptuous smirk. And sometimes instead of a smirk, or a cry of debate-ending “Islamophobe,” a statement is made of such breathless idiocy that one doesn’t quite know what to say. The recent remark of Germany’s ambassador to the Vatican, Annette Schavan, was such a statement. She asserted that “there are warmongers who embrace religion. But that does not mean that religion promotes war. Religion has the great power to bring peace….Islam must be part of the solution.” Could it be that not all religions are identical, that Islam — Qur’an and Hadith and Sira — is suffused with “warmongering” and cannot possibly be “part of the solution” to the very “problem” its adherents alone have created?

In answering these absurd remarks and tendentious charges, it is always a good idea to quote, to bring to your opponent’s attention, and to force him to recognize and, if possible, answer, the superior detailed knowledge you offer in response to his one-word — “Islamophobia” — dismissal. Don’t simply respond in vague kind, but stick closely to details, quoting chapter and verse from the Qur’an. Bring any of more than 150 Jihad verses into the discussion. For example: 2:190-191, 9:5, 2:191, 3:112, 5:33. Keep repeating them, so that those who think they can get away merely by invoking “Islamophobia” have to respond. Mention little Aisha, the massacre of the prisoners at the Battle of the Trench, the attack on the Jewish farmers of the Khaybar Oasis, the murders of Abu Afak and Asma bint Marwan. Always stick to the same handful of stories. Force your opponent to recognize and admit to these episodes in the life of Muhammad, the Perfect Man (al-insan al-kamil), the Model of Conduct (uswa hasana). And if he fails to do so, point out that failure to others who may be listening and looking for enlightenment. Refer, whenever you can, and quote from, the celebrated Western scholars of Islam, and wonder aloud why some think — like your opponent — that they can speak about Islam without having done the necessary work, without having even recognized the existence of these scholars they ought to, but did not, consult. Hold your opponent’s baseless dismissals up for inspection and ridicule, but on the basis of those details that come from three sources: the texts of Islam, the Western scholars of Islam, and the Defectors from the Army of Islam.

You will be ready with those enlightening eye-opening details about Islam — meant not just for your opponent, but for the broader public that is listening, or eavesdropping. Your opponent — used to relying on smirks and single-word dismissals instead of coherent debate — will not. And that is exactly the result you want.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Hugh Fitzgerald, Sharia, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: Cologne


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Neil Jennison says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 5:57 pm

    Oh Lord, when will the west’s “leaders” wake up?

    • nacazo says

      Jan 19, 2016 at 6:06 pm

      When we elect leaders that are already awake and ridicule into oblivion those that are asleep and don’t want to wake up.

      trump is barely awake. obama and hillary are sleeping and taking more sleeping pills.

      • Tom says

        Jan 19, 2016 at 9:17 pm

        How can you say Trump is barely awake? He publicly stated several times to ban Muslims from entering our country! I agree; stop these mothers now.

        VOTE TRUMP; the rest are lame dogs.

        • Linde Barrera says

          Jan 19, 2016 at 10:19 pm

          To Tom- Of course you are entitled to your opinions. But I think you are incorrect to say that Ted Cruz is a “lame dog” about Islam because he has spoken out about vetting Syrian Muslim refugees and has challenged President Obama on his plans to bring in tens of thousands of “Syrian refugees”. Don’t take my word for it. Google it.

        • Arthur says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 1:15 am

          Ben Carson was the first to speak directly about Islam. He is probably the sole candidate who actually understands what Islam is about. Trump only started speaking out about Islam when Ben Carson surged ahead of him in the polls. Trump is surrounding himself with a personality cult.

          Ben Carson is the candidate I support. He is wise, intelligent, and we all know from where his sense of morality comes. His character resembles the leaders who founded this country.

        • Shane says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 9:53 am

          Trump or Cruz is the only hope our country has of defeating the jihad and securing our borders. the Democrat party is selling out America to get the votes of Hispanics and Muslims. The left are traitors who actively aid our jihadi enemies.

        • dajjal says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 10:28 pm

          Trump has yet to figure out WTH is going on. You and I know and have known for a long time. remember he condemned the Draw Moe Contest at Garland. That alone is sufficient to turn me off. Our real choices are Cruz and Santorum, and the later has no chance.

        • nacazo says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 1:04 pm

          Yes. Ben Carson seems to be wide awake. As a matter of fact you could say Ben Carson started the conversation on the issue of islam in politics and Trump followed and has started to wake up.

          I would also support Ben Carson over Trump particularly since Trump is clueless on how important is Freedom of Speech (as shown in his comment after ISIS attack on Garland Art Exhibit).

        • Spot On says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 3:55 pm

          I like Cruz and Carson but Trump gets things done. Look how he handled the Marxist media. He hit them between the eyes as needed until they understood. While they still hate Trump, they now respect him and do not want to get in his line of fire.

          I expect this is how he became so very successful. Very few people if any can do what Trump does. Trump builds buildings that are beautiful, of great value, and must not fall down. He loves Christian values and that is a bonus.

          Cruz and Carson are good Christians but they lack the energy and skills necessary at this time to save this once great country from years of ravage by ruthless corrupt politicians. If either of them were President, I fear the media and corrupt politicians of both parties would dominate them and force them into a corner. No fear of that with Trump.

    • dajjal says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:07 am

      After you educate them, most likely on the 33rd day of the month of Never.

      • nacazo says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 1:21 pm

        Keep pounding them with your best weapon: the truth. Even if they never wake up, other people watching you may realize what is going on.

    • carpediadem says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:51 am

      What makes you think that they are not awake? That this is not deliberate?
      Do you really think that this kind of invasion on such a scale is an accident?
      Really?
      #euroarabdialogue
      It is you who needs to wake up and realise what has been done to the West.

  2. Angemon says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 6:33 pm

    but there are also Pakistanis, Afghans, Somalis, that is, assorted Muslims from all over.

    Or, as the media calls them, Syrian Refugees.

    • Rob says

      Jan 19, 2016 at 7:38 pm

      Israeli men defend their country and are pilloried by the West.
      Syrian men desert their country and are lionized by the West.

      • Judi says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 2:55 am

        Very true Rob.

  3. pdxnag says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 6:50 pm

    It must be a routine news segment now alongside weather and sports, Islamo-Fascist assault (or alternatively Islamo-Fascist cheerleading).

  4. Mathew Solo says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 6:50 pm

    What Have We Done :

    We have watered down and marginalized all that remained of a strong and useful belief set which worked until we decided to re-invent the wheel…no we weren’t perfect…but we weren’t what we have become…God gets no respect…clergy and anyone who wants
    can simply say…yes He said that…but here’s how I see it.

    Real Men were run off long ago just for being what men were…after all they had conquered…settled…and built so well that it looked as though there was no real use for these Masculine nuisances…
    So the strong got weaker and the weak got stronger but not really.
    Our Women the once strong efficient and powerful executives of family units…The very real means of making childhood meaningful …were now demoted to being co-equal to the watered down version of what was once men…leaving this life itself now lacking all the qualities which made it really Living…clear views on what worked and what did not work just could not culminate…so all the benefactors…the exploiters of any weakness…The want to be swells…the lawyers…the greedy the fools are left to rule.

    We viewed what was learned Over thousands of years of strife and toil with contempt…We claimed enlightenment through open-mindedness…so open minded no thought could remain long enough to be useful…now with nothing to follow…we follow the nothing as if it had a meaning in it…can we say more about nothing…truth once meant what worked and what did not work…something purely real…now It is mixed with any vial reasoning…no absolute truth…no absolute anything.

    If We call on our Men now and ask them to be Men again…not knowing what this means…they might just blink at us with the dull eyed look of livestock…and go back to hunting the creature comforts that concern creatures…Our Women once hard and strong…
    genius’ at finding solutions…brilliant at advising…
    we can’t call them for help now…they left when the men left.

    • berserker says

      Jan 19, 2016 at 7:36 pm

      On that point: https://www.rt.com/op-edge/329241-europes-tragedy-merkel-immigration/

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 12:57 am

      You make things sound so bad, Solo. But nowhere in your posting do I see acknowledged the fact that Prez Barack Hussein and Secretrary John “War Coward” Kerry have determined that climate change is a greater and more immediate threat than Islam. Even our next president Hillary agrees with this, and just this weekend Bernie Sanders scolded Republicans for having the nerve to denounce climate change a fraud. We need fiction, and we’re getting it in spades. After Hillary’s election look for increased legal limits on free speech and further intervention into private economic activity in the name of fighting global warming. Manhood and personal responsibility have no place in our modern day Kabuki.

  5. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 7:18 pm

    Of the two above pictures are examples of , as in before and after the followers of what some still have the gall to call a “peaceful religion.” got hold on her. The fact is that Islam looks down very much on all non-Muslims and all females. As already stated the outcome of this is seen in those photos , For all to see who are willing to see. Sadly and tragically this is one of the many example of vicious Muslim violence against the people of Europe and not an exception. . Those Muslims by their brutal and lawless behavior are also showing not only their strong dislike and even hate the non-Muslims and females but also the arrogant contempt Western government and all Western civilization. Nevertheless the same arrogant Muslim who are so lawless also hide behind Western laws when it happens to suite them and their Islamic agenda. Of course, in Islamic countries Christians , Jews and other no-Muslims have little to no rights to protect them. Such outrageous Muslim affronts against non-Muslim females are not at all limited to cities in Germany and France but other Western countries . Such a Austria ,Switzerland , Denmark ,Norway Sweden and Finland among others. In addition , those Muslim in those cities of Europe have proven two things by the ruthlessness,brutal sexual assaults . First,by ganging up together against those European girls and women those Muslims have proven themselves to be thugs and criminals. In other words, those Muslim by their behavior have proven by their own actions that they are criminals and thugs. They are showing a wicked mindset that is the fruit of an Islamic mindset. Second they have by their own actions proven that Brigitte Gabriel was right in her book which is entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED . Which informs the reader that “Women in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt.” Indeed, they must be stopped !

  6. Dan Jones says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 8:11 pm

    It is all about divide, conquer, and control for Muslims… There is NO LOVE or TOLERANCE in islam…

    More End Time News At:
    http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=4526

  7. emma says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 9:54 pm

    beautiful poetry mathew solo! Sometimes, when all fails, poetry gives beauty to meaningless and hopelessness that would otherwise be unbearable.

    • Mathew Solo says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 8:16 am

      I Love You Too emma… If You and I were on a road and a lion approached…
      I would stand between You and the Lion…and if I did fall I know the Lion would
      have You to reckon with then.

  8. sidney penny says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 10:24 pm

    “Hold your opponent’s baseless dismissals up for inspection and ridicule, but on the basis of those details that come from three sources: the texts of Islam, the Western scholars of Islam, and the Defectors from the Army of Islam.”

    What about non Western scholars of Islam?
    .
    http://www.amazon.com/The-History-India-Told-Historians/dp/1147024839

    The History of India, As Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period, Volume 2

    OWN means Muslims historians who recorded what the Muslims rulers did

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 12:50 am

      Sita Ram Goel, an Infidel, a current day Hindu, has added substantially to the history of India. And while most Indians are forced to remain silent about Moslems, they are perhaps the only people on earth who will stand up to them and fight when pushed too far. There is nothing too far for the Europeans, they have neither the ideology nor the birth rate to resist.

      • Pong says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 4:39 pm

        No. Indians are not only people, who will fight. Think about Thai and also Japanese.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:43 am

      Hugh Fitzgerald is very, very well aware of the work of non-Dhimmi Indian historians – of the work of K S Lal; in past postings, in previous years, he has mentioned Sita Ram Goel.

      Have a look around in the archives here at jihadwatch – try the search terms “Hugh Fitzgerald” “India” – and see what comes up.

  9. Stephen Lee says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 10:29 pm

    Germany Leaders n Europe Leaders are asking for troubles.

    You are inviting huge troubles into your own country n people.

    They are bringing in their own cultures, gods, adding more social disharmony, wars, fights, rapes, diseases, bad habits, etc.

    Y dun SaudiArabia & Middle East countries invite them to their own country ??

    .

  10. David says

    Jan 19, 2016 at 11:24 pm

    A Muslim can’t rape a non-Muslim woman because rape is sexual violence
    plus privilege and Muslims don’t have privilege like non-Muslims. They
    must lack privilege otherwise they wouldn’t need to lash out.

    More explained here:

  11. citycat says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 12:02 am

    Now if Muslim women were raped there would heavy reaction from Muslims.
    There’s not much reaction from the infidels over infidel women being raped, relatively speaking.
    Muslims are more united than the infidels.
    1.1 million rushing the rest of the population is an idea that might not be mine alone, and should be looked at by infidels in the name of common sense

    • Western Canadian says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 12:39 am

      If muslim women were to be raped (any very few have any appeal – ugly from within rises to the surface), by filthy infidels, would the women still be (dis)honour murdered??

  12. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 12:45 am

    Clearly we do not all know “what is going on” — after all, we are allowing into our countries large numbers of people who grew up suffused in a faith that teaches them to despise, and to be hostile to, non-Muslims.

    Most who admit to willful ignorance and self-delusion decry this as political correctness, a misnomer if there ever was one. It is fictive reality, where so many believe something that is false to be true that it may as well be. It started with socialism, the idea that society is responsible for one’s well being, that hard work and personal responsibility could be permanently replaced by other people’s money. The in steps Islam, a belief system designed from the ground up to feast on falsehood. The first stroke of this was when the Holy Prophet Mohammed instituted a protection racket to extort money based on the idea that the Infidels would be protected from some unnamed unseen malefactor, and not the Moslems who just took over.

    Resistance to the encroachment of Islam is perhaps possible to resist. To tear down the fictive reality that Moslem are normal just like us would require tearing down the fictive realities that surround it, that form the basis on which Islam flourishes. Such resistance, if it ever attempted openly, would require dismantling the opinion programming institutions in our schools, churches, governments and media. All that happening at once is nigh impossible. Doing that would require en masse legal action and fighting in the streets, yet our legal systems are set up on the idea of equality. So even if mass deportation were an option, that’s been pulled off only once that I know of, in Iberia. I know of no attempt to deprogram Moslems en masse, and doubt that’s ever even been mulled as a necessary option, much less attempted. These are dark times, with the malevolent hand of Karl Marx apparent in it and the predictive fingerprints of George Orwell and Marshall McLuhan on it. The “it” here is takeover, by hijrah migration and demographic Jihad in the face of declining Infidel birth rates, made even more dangerous by our ideals of equality, fairness and justice, none of which are shared by our common enemy.

  13. mortimer says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 12:56 am

    Hugh Fitzgerald is onto something important: a protocol for answering absurd remarks about Islam.

    I hope he publishes his thoughts in a book with a title such as ‘WINNING ARGUMENTS WITH A JIHADIST OR WESTERN KNOW-NOTHING’.

    This is what we need to move the discussion forward with the people counterjihadists know every day. Most of these people cannot fathom that the Koran is a troop-motivator and that the hadiths are the tactical manual of jihad.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:54 am

      “Citizen Warrior” has lots and lots of helpful tips and resources.

      Go and check it out.

      And CW has some interesting advice as to the “manner” (whether face to face or in cyberspace) that we who have come to know and understand the meaning and menace of Islam must try to employ when seeking to awaken others.

      1/ Be calm 2/ Be CLEAR 3/ Be **casual** 4/ be BRIEF (this is really, really hard for me and for others of us here…we tend to ‘data dump’ – my poor husband complains about this all the time, so I have a LOT to learn about how to ‘keep it short, sharp and around the subject’ 5/ Be cool and 6. DO NOT exaggerate/ overstate – Citizen Warrior insists we will have a better impact if we understate.

      All of this is very, very hard for me, because my Scots and Irish ancestry and cultural heritage means that when I encounter the sheer horribleness of Islam I get ANGRY…and the anger I feel about Islamic horribleness gets into my attempts to explain to people. But my resolution for this year is to try to remember Citizen Warrior’s advice. Because CW has ‘road-tested’ his (her?) methods on real people and has discovered that they work.

      A further thought (and it’s very hard to do, but I think we have to take this attitude): it is NO GOOD to tell ourselves before we even begin that the job is hopeless, or that people / our society/ our nation/ the West are too far gone. Shut that out. It’s just Feeding the Dementors.

      Take a deep breath and just keep on keeping on…communicating. When we fail, pick ourselves up, reread the Handy Hints for Getting Through, and…try again.

      • nacazo says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 1:35 pm

        My observation after responding to some inane comment in a news item or youtube video of the “islam is a chapion for women’s rights”, is that the clueless stop answering (they have no argument against the truth) and the hardcore islamists take over with a high dose of taqiya. they also start trying to deviate the conversation into politics, the evils of christianity or atheism, etc. I keep the conversation going so the clueless realize what is going on so yes, the protocol is similar when dealing with the clueless and the islamist: stick to specifics and cite verse and chapter of the quran, hadith, sira, etc. And on the diversionary counter-attacks (I am Christian so they always point to some perceived failure of Christianiyt) I provide a short defense of Christianity and add: But even if Christianity is the worse thing in the universe(teaches husbands to beat the wife five times a day) how does that change the fact that quran 4:34 allows a muslim husband to beat his wife? It’s always helpful to put a disclaimer at the end since collectivists (leftists in general) have a tough time separating attacks on an ideology from attacks on an not-so-defenseless “minority”. So I always add something along the lines of (99 percent muslims don’t beat their wife/support violence against non-muslims, I’m discussing quranic doctrine).

        To the attacks that “islamophobia” is like antisemitism. I point that islam is not part of any muslim nature as they could change religion while antisemites would kill jews regardless of their religion (atheist jew, muslim jew, christian jew, all had to go according to hitler).

  14. dlbrand says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 am

    Amen, Hugh–excellent.

    Indeed, indeed, indeed.

    And to the line.

    • dajjal says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:22 am

      While I agree with you and Hugh, I’d prefer to see more details about the idea set of Islam and links to sources. While I lack Hugh’s vocabulary and facility with the languge, two of my blog posts could serve as models. These pdf compilations can be embedded in blog posts and attached to emails.

      https://www.scribd.com/doc/227418623/Islam-s-Mercenary-Mission-Updated
      https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims

      Mike Ghouse started a blog for the purpose of refuting my posts, then abandoned it without posting to it. Can you guess why?

      There was one notable ommission from the excelent essay: mention of the writings of Robert Spencer.

  15. grace says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 2:01 am

    http://www.oddee.com/item_98705.aspx

    These anti rape devices should be flying of the shelves in Europe. Anti rape should be the business to invest in in Europe.

    • dajjal says

      Jan 20, 2016 at 2:24 am

      Raid Wast & Hornet and pistol grip spray can accesories should be flying off the shelves, too.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 3:02 am

        I foresee a run on Doberman Pinschers, Rottweilers, Irish Wolfhounds, Bull Mastiffs, Alsatians, and any number of other large protective dogs with Attitude.

        The Accessory that no Infidel female should be seen without.

        The first nightclub in Germany that puts up a “Ladies: You May Bring Your Dog” sign (and adjusts its layout to accommodate) is likely to do a roaring trade.

        One suspects that Mohammedans would stay well away from a bar that had 1/enormous dogs at the entrance giving all customers the ‘once over’ as they entered and 2/ large panting dogs or small, intense, highly-focused dogs – on leads, of course, and provided with water bowls and suitable treats such as a nice big rawhide chew – lurking in corners or sitting under the mistress’s bar stool or bench.

        *Infidel* males, on the other hand, would most likely not be that worried; they would be nice and polite and the dogs would function as “conversation starters”…

        • dajjal says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 3:25 am

          A properly trained german shepherd or border collie would be expensive to buy, feed and maintain. A an of bug spray costs far less, is easily replacable and can throw a flame 20′.

        • Western Canadian says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 7:23 pm

          Only as a start. There is a serious need to be on guard against attacks on the dogs, either by poisoning, clubbing or shooting. muslims don’t just rear dogs, they hate them, and those who are lucky enough to love them.

        • Western Canadian says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 7:26 pm

          Should be ‘fear’, not ‘rear’.

      • Mark Swan says

        Jan 20, 2016 at 9:09 am

        dajjal…You might be on to something…those hairless…eye lash less…eyebrow less rascals trying to explain what happened is fun to imagine…yet I wouldn’t want to see those empty containers lying around after the rascals finish snorting them.

        • dajjal says

          Jan 20, 2016 at 10:23 pm

          Petrochemicals propelled by butane or propane will do much more than shave off surplus fur. First degree burns, at minimum. I doubt that even ‘slimes are stupid ’nuff to huff Raid!

  16. Darshans says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 6:11 am

    Europe is sadly going the India way. In India also anybody talking for hindus is painted communal and the ones who mock hindus are secular. Ones who appreciate and cuddle Islam become leaders.

    We have RSS Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which is a Hindu outfit working for unification of hindus and spreading the knowledge about Islam.

    You need something like that in Europe and USA otherwise you are doomed for sure. Trust me no one will protect you from these Islamic goons, you have to stand on your own feet and fight your battle.

  17. TheOldOligarch says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 7:13 am

    This is excellent advice, I’ve said basically as much to the handful people i have convinced on this issue. Basically, that they cannot really repeat what they heard from me to another person who isn’t already sort of on board and get any traction. They will have to do the work themselves to be taken seriously. The ONLY thing that works in the kinds of arguments you’ll have with these deluded people is to simply have read the sources and be able to quote them verbatim. The one effective argument I’ve found is ”I’ve read the Quran, a good deal of Hadith, and the earliest Sira by ibn Ishaq/Hisham. Also, here is my extensive historical knowledge of the Crusades complete with numerous references to characters, dates of battles and peace treaties, and primary sources both Christian and Muslim, that I have read. And just what the fuck do you know about this topic? Oh, nothing? Well then why exactly do you feel entitled to your ridiculous opinion on the matter?”

    It’s the nature of the beast, they get to just say Islamophobe, you have to actually know what you’re talking about. As the author said, there really is no alternative to just acquiring an enormously superior understanding of the issue, and then beating these idiots over the head with it.

  18. Servant of Jesus Christ says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31 pm

    The Vatican is not the solution but the BIGGEST part of the problem. They are Revelations 17 is all about. They are stirring up the pot by promoting the Muslims agenda, but we’ve read the rest of the book an know the final outcome. God will be Victorious an his Kingdom will be set up here on Earth.

  19. Omar Kahlid says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 2:16 pm

    As a convert from islum I can attest to the facts that islam is soul killing. Born from a pedophiles wet dream islam allows muzlums to do anything to anyone. Rape, murder are little things compared to the life of moohammed. Better than God you are in the USA where when islum starts to show it’s satanic head citizens will put it into the grave fast.

  20. Aussie Infidel says

    Jan 20, 2016 at 3:44 pm

    Another wonderful article from Hugh. Unfortunately, most Western leaders understand very little about Islam, and particularly its doctrine of ‘hijra’, or ‘migration in the cause of Allah’. Our western media is cowered by threats of retribution from Muslim thugs, to pursue any stories like the New Year assaults on women in dozens of European cities. In fact, the ‘Fourth Estate’ is acting more like a ‘Fifth Column’ in our midst, aiding and abetting those who are determined to subjugate us all. Our leaders are like the blind leading the blind. In the US presidential race, only Trump, Carson, and possibly Cruz, seem to have any understanding of “what is going on” with Muslim immigrants or the so-called ‘refugees’ streaming into Europe – or the urgency of doing anything about it.

    From long experience, I can attest that Hugh is absolutely right that most Muslims are, “suffused in a faith that teaches them to despise, and to be hostile to, non-Muslims”. And there has been a refusal in the West, to “discuss this matter calmly, and to inform oneself appropriately by studying the texts of Islam, and … non-Muslim scholars”, because of the insidious viruses of political correctness and cultural relativism which have infected our societies. Hugh is also right that Islam “is suffused with ‘warmongering’ and cannot possibly be ‘part of the solution’ to the very ‘problem’ its adherents alone have created.”

    I agree that to counter these trends, and accusations of “Islamophobia” from Muslims and their apologists, we must respond with “superior knowledge … quoting chapter and verse from the Qur’an” – and Hugh provides some examples. Here is another – this time from the Hadith – which succinctly portrays the Muslim mindset.

    “Arabs [Muslims] are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah’s helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah’s Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us.” (Hadith Al-Tabari 9:69).

  21. Nathanael Hoernlé says

    Jan 21, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    Readers should be aware that, when you cite the violent commands in the Qur’an and the Hadith, you will always be countered with two things – the insistence that such passages refer only to the seventh century when Islam was under siege, and, similar passages from the Bible (about which you will say that they really do refer only to an ancient time and place, but with that you will impress nobody unless you concede that the same thing has to be true of the Islamic texts). If you refer to some of the Muslim behaviour that Hugh Fitzgerald describes, you will be countered with similar behaviour from others. If you note that the world is host to many Muslim terror organizations you will have the Ku Klux Klan and the Lord’s Army of Joseph Kony thrown in your face. Take note that the determination to white-wash Islam no matter what it inspires is as adamant as is the conviction that holding it to account is bigotry. Hugh Fitzgerald gives good advice about the crying need to acknowledge Islam’s darkest proclivities, but don’t ever think it will be easy to stick to your guns over the matter. You will be fought, every step of the way.

  22. Steve Kaputnik says

    Jan 29, 2016 at 8:59 am

    So…smartypants,
    Instead of preaching,
    TELL US THE SOLUTION!!!
    What, you have none?
    Thought so all the time.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Naildriver on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.