Sami Abu-Yusuf agrees with Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker, who also blamed the victims and promised to give the women of Cologne “guidance” so they could “prepare” next time. Presumably she will direct them not to be “half naked and wearing perfume.” A hijab might set off their ensemble quite nicely, and avoiding provoking the poor Muslim migrants.
“Muslim cleric ‘says Cologne sex attacks were VICTIMS’ fault because they wore perfume,’” by Charlie Peat, Express, January 20, 2016:
A MUSLIM cleric has allegedly claimed women sexually assaulted during the New-Year Cologne attacks are to blame “because they were half naked” – in a shocking statement.
The shocking claims reportedly made by Sami Abu-Yusuf of the Salafist Cologne mosque also pointed the finger at the innocent victims for “wearing perfume”.
According to Breitbart he allegedly said: “We need to react properly, and not to add fuel to the fire.
“The events of New Year’s Eve were the girls’ own fault, because they were half naked and wearing perfume. It is not surprising the men wanted to attack them.”
On the last day of the year mobs of refugees assaulted more than 500 women in and around Cologne railway station, sexually molesting and robbing them.
The incident has caused uproar in Cologne and calls have been made for Chancellor Angela Merkal [sic] to change her open-door policy.
Several rallies have also been staged in the German city against migration.
The horror attacks have sparked riots as tensions between protestors and counter-protestors reaches breaking point.
Police officer notes describe a timeline of how women were surrounded by men who put their hands down their trousers and groped their breasts.
When the victims dropped their belongings trying to defend themselves they were robbed, according to the notes.

Singh the Sikh says
How did this piece of trash end up in Cologne?
nicu says
Merkel invited them !!!
But they come since 30 years already ….
Arnold Hiller says
‘cos the white european population wants this.
No other reason.
gravenimage says
All too many Germans and other Europeans believed they were helping desperate refugees.
This is suicidally naive–but saying that white Europeans want to be mass raped is just wrong.
Here’s the story of an idealistic German woman who was initially very enthusiastic about helping newcomers at a refugee center:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/636372/Death-threats-harassment-German-workers-refugee-centre
In just days, she was frightened and disgusted with much of what she saw of these “refugees”.
Arnold Hiller says
Balderdash. If the europeans dont want it then why are they not doing anything? A few million are defending their culture. The rest are sheep.
Angemon says
All Germans have to do is to look at the children of “migrants” who grew up in Germany:
Western Canadian says
The Europeans are trying to fight back, the leftists on top are making it harder for them, not wishing to lose control of the herd.
chanah says
“white european population wants this”
yeah right remember this when where you live is being swamped by muslims, we have no say in thematter as long as our gov’t is braindead, we do protest but we have no means to do other than protest we don’t have or own guns and even with that what should we do shot our gov’t, so now tell me what abt black Africns in Nigeria Kenya Mali do they want islam? If no then what’s been done, we see boko haram killing left and right, and still nothing been done .
Western Canadian says
He (it) was invited by morons claiming to be our betters. Remember??
When garbage like this is dragged through the streets and hung by its criminal neck until dead, Europe will be safe.
Arnold Hiller says
I completely agree. Best statement yet
Western Canadian says
Given the imbecilic nature of your other posts, your praise sets my teeth on edge. No thanks.
abad says
Yeah huh.
And the Cleric is complaining of the perfume they were wearing.
In Cologne.
How ironic eh.
dumbledoresarmy says
If the Cologne police haven’t *already* searched his mosque – and his house, and his car – then they *should*.
Right now.
Using sniffer dogs.
That’s what should happen.
And if they find *anything* at all …’funny’ (wouldn’t it be interesting if they found a stash of stolen goods…like women’s mobile phones?)…then his mosque should be shut down, and *he* (after a suitable jail term on whatever charge is applicable) should be out of Germany and on his way back to Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or wherever, with the imprint of a number ten boot on his backside. Out with him!
For all we know, this b*st*rd might have *organised* and *incited* the attacks.
Panmelia says
All your suggestions are excellent, dumbledoresarmy, but are unlikely to be carried out. After all, the mayor of Cologne has all but blamed the assaulted women themselves for the attacks on the grounds that they were ignorant and didn’t understand the muslim men’s perverted sexual mores. These were instilled in them by Mucky Moe’s command that only a woman’s face and hands should be showing. If she revealed more than that, she was begging to be raped and it was all her fault.
And of course, the poor, misunderstood muslim perverts couldn’t really be expected to respect the laws, culture, freedoms and tolerance of Germany, the country that had so rashly offered them sanctuary from war, or more likely, economic hardship. Naturally, they expect to behave exactly as they please because being muslim men they belong to a superior religion that validates their contempt for women as sexual slaves. Plus, they are just waiting for the time that the black flag of ISIL is hoisted above the German equivalent of 10 Downing Street, so they might as well start the ball rolling by terrorising German women into donning black bin bags. Mutti Merkel has invited 1m of muslims into the country with another half million to come, so it can’t be long now before they begin the jihad.
If the cowardly PC liberal sensitivities of the German government have prevented them from immediately sacking this traitorous Cologne mayor, it’s not likely that they will take any drastic action against a holy muslim cleric, is it?
revereridesagain says
Still, it’s the thought that counts, and anything involving sniffer DOGS in a mosque is an excellent thought. Score one more for dda!
Taking a purely fantasy approach, how’s about we strip Sami down to his tighty-whiteys (assuming he wears any), pour a bottle of Aqua Velva over his head, then drop him into the middle of an ISIS camp after Friday prayers?
DFD says
revereridesagain says “……..how’s about we strip Sami down to his tighty-whiteys (assuming he wears any), pour a bottle of Aqua Velva over his head, then drop him into the middle of an ISIS camp after Friday prayers?”
You think they like bearded women? Mind you, with them….
Delando Islam
Keith says
This muslim cleric says “The events of New Year’s Eve were the girls’ own fault, because they were half naked and wearing perfume. It is not surprising the men wanted to attack them.”
What I understand from his words is the following – We muslims are subhuman who are completely incapable of controlling our emotions or actions in the presence of other human beings.
Westman says
Muslim men have lost control of “desires” since the early days with Muhammad’s approval. Only in Islamic culture is the woman responsible for a man’s “desires” as if they were little elves of shaitan. Does anyone think the captives in the following text were “asking for it” from the subhumans?:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him):
0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger , and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
The question to Muhammad was only about making the captive women pregnant. Muhammad approved of their rape. This is Muhammad’s, and by extension became Islam’s, true attitude toward infidel women.
Westman says
Notice the phrase “we decided to have sexual intercourse with them” which is a deceitful translation to mitigate the reality.
The proper translation would be, “we decided to rape them”. And another key word is “decided”; it was a choice, just as it was a choice for the gropers and rapists of the Cologne New Year. They are predators without excuse.
? says
“The events of New Year’s Eve were the girls’ own fault, because they were half naked and wearing perfume. It is not surprising the men wanted to attack them.”
Spoken like a true rapist…
Arab scum…
Infidel from Down Under says
The cleric obviously believes if a woman does wear the full burqa she is deemed half naked , but even if they were fully naked it is still no excuse .Given it was Cologne in winter i would suggest most the women would have been rugged up anyway
And as for the perfume bit , while muslims require their women to smell like a camels armpit ,we infildel guys are a bit more discerning than that
Michael Copeland says
I smell a rat.
DFD says
Michael Copeland says “I smell a rat.”
Only one? Have your nose checked, 🙂 I smell about 1.2-1.4 billion rats. The wole planet’s infested.
Salute & Delando Islam
salim says
According to Mohammed, he liked two things: Women and perfume. Good Muslims always use perfumes and keep them in their pockets to use it in mosques, that is only if they happened to be men.
On the other hand, an average Muslim must have heard of a hadith that women who use perfume commit a sin similar to committing adultery. You don’t even have to go to mosques to hear the hadith, its on Friday’s loudspeakers everywhere.
From the Islamic point of view. the Imam is right.
manuel paleologus says
Many people are already sick and tired of these muslim crap. If you or other like to observe these keep them for yourself and do not blame anybody else. Look at the heart of islam and see what is: sword, crime, rape, sodomy, incest, adultery and other anomalies.
gravenimage says
salim is not *condoning* this barbarism–just noting it. He is a solid Anti-Jihadist.
salim says
I don’t believe in religions but I stated some facts in my post. I don’t understand the point of the comments.
Westman says
Salim,
I think it was a mis-understanding. I understand what you meant. I didn’t know about Muhammad’s fondness for perfume. This is what I found:
– Abu Hurayra (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said, “Anyone offered rayhan (basil perfume) should not decline it. It is light in weight and fragrant in scent.”
– Putting on perfume and going out with the aim of letting non-mahram men smell it. This is haraam, and is a major sin.
– It was narrated from Abu Moosa (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If a woman puts on perfume and passes by people so that they can smell her fragrance, then she is such and such,” and he spoke sternly – meaning an adulteress. Narrated by Abu Dawood (4173) and al-Tirmidhi (2786); classed as saheeh by Ibn Daqeeq al-Eid in al-Iqtiraah (126) and by Shaykh al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
So, men wearing perfume is OK; a woman passing by non-relatives, while wearing perfume, is haraam.
Islam has reduced women to owned objects most suitable for reproduction and slavery. Any “unowned” woman is fair prey for its predators. Churchill was right.
salim says
Thanks for your input and for the effort to research it. I am not good in researching hadith but I still can remember the important ones by heart. The famous one on perfumes is: “two things I loved and they are perfume and women” (dont ask me in which sahih book written)
It is highly unlikely to find a muslim man who says I don’t like any of the things his prophet liked such as dates and perfume!
Women are not supposed to exhibit anything that makes them attractive, clothes, makeup, way of walking, voice ….etc. If they do, they get punished in hell and often here by people such as the migrants.
gravenimage says
salim, I believe the posters above were unfamiliar with your history here and assumed you agreed with this disgusting Islamic attitude.
abad says
The “perfume” that Muslim males wear only attracts goats, NOT human women.
But camel piss/perfume will do that them.
Carolyne says
I have noticed that middle easterners always have a bottle of some kind of lemon smelling liquid which they get out and douse themselves with from time to time. I don’t know if this is in place of a bath or they just like to smell like fruit.
This Imam needs to be shaved, dressed in women’s clothing, sprayed with “Evening in Paris” and set down in the middle of a so-called refugee camp and we’ll see how long he lasts. Once they discover he is a man, it won’t make any difference. They swing both ways, but prefer little boys. I think anything will do, though.
nacazo says
Good point, Mohamed loved perfum. So according to the logic of this islamist, Mohamed should have been sexually assaulted.
Westman says
Nacazo,
Logically yes. There is little logic in Islam Ideology. Quite the double standard! It most likely was used by men to cover up the need for a bath and conserve water.
Here is a perfume ad for “men”:
http://www.fragrantica.com/perfume/Al-Haramain-Perfumes/Fakhrul-Arab-3900.html
Gbox says
These people are simply ignorant. No wonder their contributions to the world are almost nil.
Western Canadian says
Not merely ignorant…. they know so many things, it’s just that they are all false….
epistemology says
At least he admits, the perps were all muzzies. But this stupid imam wants to implement sharia here. No, this is Europe and we don’t want any sharia here, we have the right values and muzzies don’t. Muzzies have to assimilate and Islam needs to be abolished.
mortimer says
epistemology wrote: “Islam needs to be abolished”
That is the question. Islam is IRRECONCILABLE with European civilization.
The cultural Marxists see migration of the ‘noble savages’ as the best way to destroy Western culture, but they do not realize the discriminatory nature of Sharia.
Western Canadian says
islam (RTC) is irreconcilable with human existence… And it is interesting that marxists (RTC) are in alliance with it, even though both are fascist systems that seek only the power of life and death over all of humanity…. marx was, even with all his other faults, also one of the filthiest racists in all of Europe…..
Rob says
Yeah right.
According to the weather stats the overnight temperature in Cologne was about 1 degree C (32 F) on NY Eve.
PRCS says
I didn’t know what the temp was there until you posted it, but no rational, thinking person could possibly believe that anyone would be out and about–half naked–at midnight in a European winter.
nacazo says
According to the islamic mindset, if they were not in hijab, they were naked.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes.
That’s the thing people *have* to try to understand.
From the POV of any fully-instructed Muslim, ALL infidel females are “naked” because they are **not wearing Islamic dress**.
A Christian *nun* or an Amishwoman is ‘naked’. A little girl – say, eight or ten years old – in her perfectly modest (by our standards) school uniform, with her hair in plaits, is NAKED. A soccer mom, with her hair in a ponytail, in her pedal-pushers and T-shirt, is, by our standards, fully clothed…but from the POV of the slavering mohammedan horde, she is NAKED.
For some Muslims, ‘nakedness’ constitutes “visible head-hair, ears and neck; anything other than the hands visible”.
For others, a woman is ‘naked’ if even her *face* – or just the *eyes, even*, feet and *hands* are visible (hence the burqa that converts a woman into a ghost, concealing even the eyes, and the *really* ‘devout’ females who wear black gloves to hide even the skin of their hands).
I remember, years ago, here at jihadwatch, a truly horrifying quote from some pious mohammedan who was declaring that if you encounter a ‘naked’ woman and you can’t cover her/ force her to cover, then you should *kill* her.
mortimer says
Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker has taken the side of the PERPETRATORS against the interests of GERMAN WOMEN.
She has put the invaders’ interests before the interests of the indigenous German people.
Edwin1683 says
Ugh. What a foul, evil thing Islam is.
Mike says
Colognes Mayor Henriette Reker should be put on a plane with a one way ticket to Saudi for a year to learn Sharia law and then perhaps she’ll learn to keep her mouth shut unless its to support the real victims.
Jay Boo says
Feminist bitches are apparently not even (feminists)
Just (bitches).
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/09/feminist-leader-naomi-wolf-howls-as-her-justifications-of-islamic-misogyny-are-exposed
Westman says
The most ridiculous argument of Naomi Wolf is that covering Muslim women in black tents makes men think of them as a person instead of objects.
Since Muslim women are expected to avoid infidel men and be in the presence of a male relatives while outside the home, they become less noticeable and personal than a herd of Holstein cattle and about as valuable.
The merchant wants their money, the Mosque wants them in the back, and the husband wants a home-slave and baby-maker until he finds another. Everyone is happy?
PRCS says
In order to make a visual statement to him and his salafist flock, politicians, and “journalists”, “half naked” German women (a condition open to interpretation and weather condition) should splash themselves with perfume and parade in front of his mosque during Friday prayers; making sure to catch the attention of the harem as they enter through to women’s entrance, too.
Frank says
If Muslims are drawn to partially exposed women, LET THEM TURN THEIR EYES SOMEWHERE ELSE, instead of intruding in other people’s lives.
Westman says
Very high Ewwww factor here. Definitely turning the eyes “somewhere else” Molesting a manequin – for practice?
https://youtu.be/gnIGe64-cPw
PRCS says
Good grief!
gravenimage says
EEEEEWWWWWWW! No mannequin is safe. Pathetic, creepy, and deeply disturbing–especially at the end, where his actions are *all too clear*.
But what makes this more disturbing than funny is that chances are he won’t stop at fashion displays, but will molest and rape actual women.
Champ ッ says
…must be the first time he’s ever gotten to second base, lol!
dumbledoresarmy says
He thought she was one of allah’s houris come down to earth?
Champ ✿ says
Probably! 😀
Edwin1683 says
This mannequin was wearing perfume.
Champ ッ says
And golly she’s “half naked”, yeah she’s the perfect ‘woman’ for this loser …
خَليفة says
Classic psychopath/Muslim excuse – they made me do it. Civilized people understand this as a lack of self control.
Muslims are by nature mentally twisted creatures. e.g. if you expose their evil ways they want to kill you and anyone else that knows – yet they are happy to continue with their evil ways as long as no one knows. The epitome of hypocrisy. They would rather remain ignorant of the truth than have someone point out they are wrong – they are content in their delusions of life and God, and would rather kill you than change.
Angemon says
Can you imagine the s***storm it would ensue if a conservative said something similar? Can you imagine the shrieking feminist harpies going full apoplectic?
Half-naked? In German Winter? I find that a little hard to believe. As for the perfume – or cologne – maybe it was just deodorant – a concept that may be be completely alien to desert dwellers.
Even if they were half-naked and covered in perfume, it was not German men who assaulted them, no matter how hard the PC crowd wishes it.
And there were several counter-rallies – people actually saying that, despite being proven that “migrants” come from a culture that is incompatible with their own, they should be allowed to pour in unconditionally.
Let’s not misdirect the readers, shall we? *Some* women were robbed, other weren’t. The goal of the attack was not to rob – taking phones or wallets was the cherry on the cake, not the cake itself.
Gene says
Well, he’s got a point. If the women didn’t bath, reeked of BO, and wore a body bag, they would blend in the Muslim crowd. And if they were complete idiots they might even pass for one this guy followers.
Walter Sieruk says
It’s a low ploy and low blow to blame the victims of the Muslims sexual assaults. The Muslims villains who committed those heinous crimes.are the real ones to blame.To shift the blame to those German girls and women is totally despicable. That Muslim cleric .who tried to blame those German females and not those Muslim males who engaged in such completely unconscionable and vile behavior is making an extreme example of the truth of the saying Which Is “That evil is always looking for an excuse.” That outrageous and absurd statement by the Muslim cleric that somehow those German girls and women are to blame and not those Muslim males is worse then nonsensical. It’s also an affront to all the is good and right. Furthermore, it should be known that the Bible teaches “Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent – the Lord detests them both.” Proverbs 17:15. [N.I.V.]
Westman says
Amen.
Arnold Hiller says
Welcome to Europe. Where racismvtowards white Europeans is accepted and allowed.
I’m done with Sweden. Bunch of idiotic losers. They get what they deserve.
Kepha says
Er du Svensk?
Strenikoff says
Coming to a place near you. What most of you don’t realize is that wherever they take over, every last contract is null and void, and that does mean marriage, business contracts , deeds , mortgages, any and all property rights, bank accounts, etc.. When our leaders, both political and appointed civil servants, cannot or will not protect their own citizens, such as women going about their daily business, or our children at school, what right do they have to hold to hold those positions ?
Arnold Hiller says
We had a mosque near us in a small suburban town in Georgia. I’m suprised this story behind the mosque was never featured on pam or Robert’s site.
The owners of the mosque wanted to build a new one on the site but super size it. That wasn’t part of the original planning permission. So they took the local city hall to court then lost.
Guess what? The feds got involved and ordered the city to accept the mega mosque.
Incidentally, right before this went to court someone spray painted the mosque sign and it was treated as a hate sign. The wording was so written by someone who’s English was a second language.
Again I’m really suprised this was never featured on jihad watch. As well as the mosque here in Kennesaw.
billybob says
In my community, the Muslims are wonderful people and a credit to America. Back in December, in solidarity with the victims of the massacre in San Bernardino, they lit a great bonfire in the central square and threw all their Qurans into it and burned them. The women followed, throwing in their hijabs and veils. Then they all sat down around our community Christmas tree and sang Christmas carols with us. In the following days, they closed down their mosque and reopened it as a shelter for the homeless. Their school became a resource centre dedicated to teaching new immigrants how to integrate with American culture, and features daily lectures on the Constitution and democracy. Nowadays they all attend the Baptist church down the street from the their old mosque, and they and their new Baptists friends work together in the shelter not only helping the homeless, but have opened a soup kitchen as well. They have become some of our finest citizens and we are proud of them!
Western Canadian says
You have talent. For writing, and for sarcasm. Both are appreciated.
PRCS says
Wow!
We must live in the same town!
Arnold Hiller says
They are dragging Le Pen and Wilders through the courts on lesser statements.
Glenn Preedy says
Islam is a religion (i.e superstition) of murder, exploitation of women and absurdity (hi-flying angels). Why i tolerate of it?
Why are mosques not seized as state assets and its believers consigned to psychotherapy units?
There is NO God, imbeciles. Try being nice to people instead of waiting for an after-life reward for being an imbecile?
gravenimage says
It’s not all people who believe in God who are out raping girls in the streets–just pious Muslims.
To pretend otherwise is just witless false moral equivalence.
Whatever your view of religion, it is clear people of most faiths are not a threat.
kepha says
Eddy and Glenn: I’m surprised you didn’t note that Moses limited the captives to be taken to the girls “who had not known man”, noting that it was the women of Midian who had seduced Israel with Ba’al-Peor.
So, tell me what else should have been done with a retrograde tribe that won’t adhere to the forward march of human history? The Midianites were a bunch of counter-revolutionary gusanos who would have had Israel give up its liberty to return to the foundations of the Egyptian slavery.
Believe me, I’ve known conscientious people certain that they “scientifically” knew what was good and right for humanity (unlike the rest of us iggerent zhlubs) who would tell me it wouldn’t be nice to future generations to leave a lot of people around who might seduce the upcoming generations away from the march of scientific progress. And they sure acted on it.
Such people probably included your high school teacher and college professor of philosophy when they were youngsters–and I know an awful lot of other people who believed firmly that we needed liberation from HaShem who also told my much younger self we really needed to “wait, see, and understand” while those conscientious and forward-looking people were busy cleaning up some pretty large swathes of the world.
DFD says
gravenimage says “It’s not all people who believe in God who are out raping girls in the streets–just pious Muslims…. it is clear people of most faiths are not a threat.”
I concur, and further: Glenn Preedy should consider events such as the Roman ‘rape of the Sabine women’, definitely not religious. Neither where many such events prior, nor afterwards. The red armies rampage of rape 1945 wasn’t religious either. They actually raped a lot of Russian women who accompanied them in various functions, and even Russian female soldiers of the fighting variety! Little known fact.
Islam however encourages raping, since it is an act of terror. Note here that the first rape camps in the Balkan wars of the late 20th century were established by the Muslims (!) and not by the Serbs, they merely retaliated in kind. The Muslims acted in accordance with the Quran, that is ‘striking terror into the hearts … those that your right hand posses..’ etc.
To Glenn Preedy specifically, when Muslims ‘conquered’, the women of the defeated become spoils of war. Moreover, they are automatically divorced from the husbands (Sharia), if the Muslim so desires/requires.
Delando Islam
Angemon says
DFD posted:
“The red armies rampage of rape 1945 wasn’t religious either. They actually raped a lot of Russian women who accompanied them in various functions, and even Russian female soldiers of the fighting variety! Little known fact.”
It probably was for the muslims drafted to fight for the soviets – the ones who didn’t defect to the German side.
Western Canadian says
islamic fascists, with a sick and twisted belief system that mocks religion, murder on average 20 million innocents in a century.
atheist fascists, with a sick and twisted belief system that mocks religion, murdered over 100 million innocents in a century.
You really should be hanging your ignorant head in shame.
Herman says
Get your numbers straight… 270 million for your islam fascists.
And how many killed by Christians, I don’t know.
And what atheists killed so many? I don’t know either, but rest assured that the only killings these days are committed by mozlims.
The rest of the world grew up, and we don’t need to attack each other, while we have a common enemy aka islam.
DFD says
Stalin approx 30-40million, Mao/Commie approx 40-50 million, Khmer Rouge approx 1.5-3 million, Nazis (mostly atheist) approx 5-8 million, mostly German Jews, German Christians and German opponents, followed by the same for the rest of Europe. That’s just the 20th century…
Christian killings, the bulk during the reformation wars, about 12 million in total (6 million in Germany alone, during the 30 years war). That was several hundred years ago. Killings by Christians over the last 2,000 years don’t account for much when compared. Please don’t count the Indians in America, they were not killed for reasons of Christianity. Note, the reformation war was NOT about Christianity, but about the political power of the Vatican.
You are however right in so far as we have a common enemy, Islam. For them, killing is actually a religious duty. As Mohammed said: “I have been made victorious by terror”. Moreover, as you stated correctly, ‘common enemy’. The rulers from Washington to Berlin, and further east, may endlessly babble on about us not being at war with Islam. However, Islam is certainly at war with us – at least, that’s what the Quran says, and its author(s).
I don’t know of any other religion that wants to spread itself by terror, Quran, by killing on every scale, and all out war (assumed its followers have a chance of winning, if not, back to terror).
Delando Islam
Western Canadian says
Thank you for the opportunity to tell you just how bloody stupid you are. Did you notice the phrase I used?
” murder on average 20 million innocents in a century.” Notice the AVERAGE and IN A CENTURY?? No? Yes muslims have murdered an average of 20 million per century, for 14 very bloody centuries…. My figures are fine, The only competition that muslims have for mass butchery (not being content with mere murder), are militant atheistic governments. As for Christians committing mass murder? IF and when they do, they have thrown themselves out of the belief system, unless of course you want to pretend that FIGHTING BACK makes one a murderer.
Western Canadian says
DFD, EXCELLENT response, welcome to the site!!
Glenn Preedy says
It’s clear that Mohammed was an impotent pervert and a pedophile with the 6 year old bride with whom he consummated marriage when she was 9 years old.
Why believe in his delusions.
I spit on him as a dog.
Herman says
When a girl is 9, then it is NOT a consummation of marriage, but PLAIN RAPE
A clear and severe case of paedophilia
Wellington says
No sane, informed woman should want to be a Muslim or even defend Islam. Every single woman who is either a Muslim or a dhimmi female who defends Islam is, at the very least, a confused human being because Islam doesn’t want men to honor women, one of many lies Islam tells, but rather, in effect, to control, blame and use them.
Herman says
“taharrush” explains it all.
Hordes of men attacking single women…
Sorry to call them ‘men’… these subhumans.
I don’t even call them animals!
Kepha says
Sorry, Wellington, “informed” and “sane” women, according to all they’ve been taught in our wonderful Western ejjikashunul systems certainly will admire Islam and defend it–and even wish to belong to it. It is the narrow, ignorant, backwards, and fanatic who refuse to see the wonderful tolerance, diversity, and nurturance of dignity for which Islam stands. And surely you must know that Judaism and Christianity were history’s greatest oppressors of wymyn? I’m also sure that once the women and girls start looking in depth at some of the things enlightenment thinkers thought about women (governed by sentiment rather than reason), they’ll have second thoughts about the enlightenment, too (after all, it was fostered by a bunch of now dead, white European males).
For the sake of other lurkers and readers, I’m sure you smelled my sarcasm in the first paragraph after about two words. But to get serious, one of the reasons why those of us who have bothered to educate ourselves in depth about religion, history, politics, law, and the like get called “bigot” is because most public education in the West has worked very, very hard to live down the history of real racism that once was; and has overcompensated by focusing solely on the relatively positive episodes and incidents in Islamic history (neglecting that Christian Syriac was one of the stepping stones of translation that fueled “Islam’s” preservation of the Greek Classics) while systematically attacking and denigrating the major underpinnings of Western civilization. We are not up against ignorance, but mis-education. This will not change until many other things like the Koln and Malmo attacks force the peoples of the West to consider that their educational and political elites have sold them a bill of shoddy goods.
Further, I’m going to make a lot of people mad at me by saying this, but one conclusion I’ve made after years of teaching is that female intelligence is more receptive than male intelligence (and I’ve seen lots of examples of both). In contrast, a highly intelligent young male will want to play around with what he’s learned, punch it, kick it, argue with it, criticize it (dominance game?) and not really “get it” until it’s beaten him after a rough quarter. It’s why girls excel over the boys in middle and high school, but why when we get to the graduate levels and professional life, the men have dominated for a long time (and, I suspect, one reason why women are catching up in medicine may be how that profession is being steadily proletarianized and stating to be less attractive to ambitious males). I fear that Western womanhood is probably in for a terrible re-education by hard experience when it comes to Islam–and it has begun in Europe under our very eyes.
Gleaner1 says
Anybody seen this, google The Kalergi Plan, it answers many questions.
Arnold Hiller says
Yes. I recently read this. But Hitler even said that France would go this way in mein kampf. But his stupidity backfired and europe is the way it is because of that morin hitler and the other imbecile churchill.
Arnold Hiller says
*moron
gravenimage says
…that morin hitler and the other imbecile churchill.
………………………..
You believe that bravely opposing Fascism made Churchill an “imbecile”? Why?
Arnold Hiller says
He contributed to the downfall of the British empire and the flooding of the west.
He’s no hero to me
gravenimage says
Here are some of the things Churchill had to say about Islam:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.”
“The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men…”
“That religion, which above all others was founded and propagated by the sword—the tenets and principles of which are instinct with incentives to slaughter and which in three continents has produced fighting breeds of men—stimulates a wild and merciless fanaticism. The love of plunder, always a characteristic of hill tribes, is fostered by the spectacle of opulence and luxury which, to their eyes, the cities and plains of the south display.”
“Indeed it is evident that Christianity, however degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a modifying influence on men’s passions, and protect them from the more violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by vaccinations. But the Mohammaden religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since its votaries have been subject, above all the peoples of all other creeds, to this form of madness.”
There’s more. Sorry you don’t consider any of this–or his brave defeat of Fascism–to be heroic.
An Anti-Jihadist, Paul Weston, was actually arrested in England for daring to quote the great man. Seems he knows something about heroism himself.
Wellington says
To maintain, as you have, Arnold Hiller (a very strange moniker since it is so euphoniously close to being that of Adolf Hitler——-really, why did you choose such?), that Churchill “contributed to the downfall of the British empire” is a ludicrous, yes, ludicrous, statement.
Churchill was just about the last defender of the British Empire and ones knows this or should know it. During the reading of the Indiana Bill in Parliament in the late 1940s under Attlee’s Prime Ministership, which said bill granted British India independence, replete with the stupid, murderous and destructive division of British India into the faux state of Pakistan and India proper, Churchill sat in silence in the House of Commons, this functioning as his rebuke of this lethal and idiotic measure. One knows this or should know it. You don’t. Churchill despised Gandhi and knew quite well that he was indeed the “Sorcerer’s Apprentice.” Do you eve get this? Probably not.
To maintain that Churchill was an imbecile, arguably the greatest Prime Minister in all of British history, and about whom even a total leftist, A.J.P. Taylor, said, in the fifteenth and final volume of the Oxford History of England, page 4, that he was “the savior of his country,” and one who wrote over fifty works of history and who received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1953, is itself imbecilic. Yes, let me be unambiguously clear. I am calling you a fool, actually an imbecile yourself, for stating what you have about Churchill.
Really, what the hell is the matter with you? And what are you really up to? I would say so far, based on the evidence, nothing good, whatever your motives, which to date I would characterize as base in the extreme.
Your turn. Give it a shot. And remember this———I am already deeply suspicious of both your intentions and your intellect. Oh yeah, your turn. Make my night.
Arnold Hiller says
Yawn…..
Wellington says
I don’t know exactly what your purpose is here at JW, Adolf Hitler, but I do know this much and that is it is not a constructive one. I know this too: that you are not capable of true argument. Your unsupported demonization of Churchill has already given you away as an intellectual lightweight. And this is the best that could be said about you.
I suspect all you are good for are unsupported accusations followed by what you think is a clever retort, e.g., “Yawn….”. Pathetic. But do keep posting here under your silly name so that you demonstrate to all of sense, yet again, what a malevolent fool you are, whatever your disreputable motive might be.
gravenimage says
Bravo, Wellington! Both excellent posts.
As for this fool’s username, it is possible that Arnold Hiller is his real name, and possible it it a reference to the 19th century German doctor–but given his approving citing of Mein Kampf (even while referring to the Führer as a “morin”), like you, I wonder…
Western Canadian says
If the ‘yawn’ was a normal reaction while waking up, that would be encouraging… given the pathetic nature of your posts, it is more likely due to your still being largely asleep. Waste of time bothering with yo, AH.
DFD says
Churchill did the best he could given the circumstances. He was, for good reasons, far more worried about the Nazis than about the Communists. He knew fully well that both were tyrants over their own peoples (?Their own peoples? Stalin was Georgian and Hitler was Austrian, neither used their real names, Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili & Alois Schicklegruber [Stalin called himself after the German word for ‘steel’]).
Churchill also knew that arming and training the imperial subjects would lead to trouble. He was certainly aware of Bismarck’s warning to the Kaiser that ‘colonies will become a millstone around our neck. Sooner or later they will learn to use modern weapons, and how to use them against us’ Unquote.
But Churchill had no choice – which one was the greater danger? Hitler and Stalin were in competition of “who can do the greater evil?” So, what could he do? He saw, and quite rightly so, the better organized and more advanced enemy as the greater threat.
That should also explain two events, why the Western powers did not intervene in the Spanish civil war, if the Nazis and Franco would not have won, a SOVIET SPANISH republic would have been established by the *Comintern* (Third International, 1913 to 1943) who fought the war against Franco. Not some freedom loving journalists and painters. Thus all of Europe would have been in a Soviet Vice. Think also about Poland, jointly invaded by the Russians and the Germans, with the Germans taking about 1/3 and the Russians the remaining 2/3s! Can you guess why the ultimatum to vacate Poland was given ‘only’ to the Germans? Think too about Czechoslovakia, it was invaded by the Germans and the Poles, they were practically allied.
Now, do you get the idea of what Churchill, and Chamberlain, were facing?
Later on Churchill found himself more and more sidelined between the two emerging superpowers – which were keen on dismantling and taking over any empire available. Talk about between a rock and a hard place! Worth was to come, Bismarck’s prediction about colonies came true – for Britain, France, Holland and Belgium.
Given all that, Churchill was definitely not an imbecile, he was politically a genius. And what he managed under such desperate circumstances is nothing less than most admirable.
PS: I am Anglo-German
Delando Islam
berserker says
Young German teen talks about how her life has been affected by the “rapefugees” (in German):
billybob says
Translate it for us please.
Kathy says
This is still available with English translation on YouTube, just type in “Bibi Wilhailm – you are destroying Germany”
gabi says
Who dislike European fashion and perfumes, better stay where they can smell camel’s ass. Period!
gravenimage says
Muslim cleric blames victims for Cologne sex attacks: “they were half naked and wearing perfume”
………………………..,
Where to start?
It was about 20°F on New Year’s Eve in Cologne–women were bundled up against the cold. Virtually no one was “half naked”.
And then,civilized Western men don’t mass attack women even if they *are* scantily dressed–only Muslims do.
Nor were these mass assaults spontaneous in cities all over Europe at the end of 2015.
There is now evidence that they were *planned*:
“Cologne Muslim sex assaults were planned, Muslims traveled from France and Belgium to join them”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/cologne-muslim-sex-assaults-were-planned-muslims-traveled-from-france-and-belgium-to-join-them
In fact, these mass sexual assaults of women by Muslim men are so widespread that Mohammedans have a name for it: Taharrush gamea.
This is exactly what journalist Lara Logan was subjected to in Tahrir Square in Cairo–and now these savages have brought this barbarism to the West.
But what the repulsive Muslim cleric Sami Abu-Yusuf has to say is not “shocking”–Islam holds that rape is always the woman’s fault. This is “uncovered meat” claim which we have seen before:
“Robert Spencer in PJ Media: The Migrant Sex Assaults: ‘Uncovered Meat’”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/robert-spencer-in-pj-media-the-migrant-sex-assaults-uncovered-meat
Wellington says
All true, gravenimage, what you asserted. Quite instructive, telling and damning how Islam serves as an excuse for men who refuse to grow up and instead insist on remaining in a state of perpetual narcissism and adolescence. Like you, I detest Islam. The wonder of it is that more by now do not.
gravenimage says
Wonderful, as always, to read your comments here, Wellington.
Herman says
“taharrush” is the latest islam custom, that I learnt about.
Ever since 9/11 I followed islam and the followers, the mozlims…. yet to find anything positive in this barbaric cult, created by a robber, murdere, rapist and paedophile…
Kay says
Apparently Muslim men can’t be trusted to control themselves, at all, ever. How completely undisciplined of them.
abad says
Agha Cleric forgot to mention the fancy jewelry the women were wearing
sarcasm off
Matthieu Baudin says
“…The events of New Year’s Eve were the girls’ own fault, because they were half naked and wearing perfume. It is not surprising the men wanted to attack them…”
Well get used to it Abu-Yusuf and kindred spirits, or get out of Europe quickly; find an Islamic Paradise and settle down there. As far as I’m concerned the women of Europe have a right to dress as fully or as scantily as the men; in other words, on beaches or in particularly hot weather, bare from the waist up if they choose. Abu-Yusuf and his marauding salivating ilk have their sights on the wholesale closeting of our lives and they continue to pursue it because there is no one standing in their way.
mortimer says
New Year’s Eve 2015 was the Muslim equivalent of Krystalnacht. The Cologne and Munich attacks were an announcement to Germans that they will now be persecuted by Islam.
gravenimage says
I’ve thought of that parallel as well, Mortimer. Jihad probably seemed a lot more scattered and random to many who were just trying to ignore the growing threat of Muslims. A lot harder to do that after NYE 2015.
What I hope is that a lot of Infidels in Europe will now *finally* wake up and realize what peril we are in.
Germans have been quoted in the last couple of weeks saying “‘everything has changed after what happened in Cologne”. I hope so.
The demonstrations against “Rapefugees” there are a good start…
Herman says
With bitches like the mayor of Cologne also blamjng the women?
I’d wondef
Or media and politcal and religious leaders ignoring these attacks on our freedoms in general and women in particular, even suppressing the reporting of these crimes
I’d wonder
I really wonder if the world, especially women did wake up?!
Kepha says
Frau Burgermeisterin Reker, Herman, knows very clearly that she wants to be neither a “racist”, “xenophobe”, or “fascist”. I agree that she needs to be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail (maybe even dumped in the polluted Rhein, since Germany lacks Huck Finn’s Mississippi); at least figuratively speaking. But my guess is that nothing in her modern mis-education has prepared her for this “taharrush” in her own city.
As for Sammy Joey’s-dad, he’s someone whom any Western country needs like another collective hole in the head. He ought to be tarred, feathered, run out of town on a rail, then dumped in the Oder to be beaten up by a bunch of unwelcoming Poles when he comes out on the other side (at least figuratively speaking). I don’t know why he isn’t telling the young men who look to him as a guide and teacher to learn a few manners towards the womenfolk of the people who have paid a lot of taxes to give them shelter. My guess is he’s fundamentally an immoral, chauvinistic, provincial twat.
Dan Jones says
And this coming from a man who follows a pedophile’s teaching
More End Time News At:
http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=4526
E Ward says
I can only be a little flippant here in response. At carnival the women should all go stark naked except for a hijab and holding a koran. Confuse the rapists to death.
Clive says
If it’s on display, it’s yours for the taking. So, a self-serve supermarket deserves shop lifting by any adherent of the islamic faith. And that would be quite OK for devout muslims.
Princess says
How very sad that humanity has become about what one wears, looks like, believes, and what religion they practice, As a Christian, the book of Revelations predicts these types of events.
What a horrible world that my children/grandchildren are forced to live in. If these idealistic idiots hate Americans, stay in your own country, fight amongst youthselves, and don’t look for the American dollar or help!!!!!!!!
We have enough of our own crazies and certainly don’t need yours.
Herman says
“Cultural enrichment” has brought us a new word: Taharrush. Remember it well, because we are going to have to deal with it a lot. Taharrush is the Arabic word for the phenomenon whereby women are encircled by groups of men and sexually harassed, assaulted, groped, raped. After the Cologne taharrush on New Year’s Eve, many German women bought pepper spray. Who can blame them?
A culture that has a specific word for sexual assaults of women by groups of men is a danger to all women. The existence of the word indicates that the phenomenon is widespread. Frau Merkel, Prime Minister Rutte and all the other open-door politicians could and should have known this.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7219/geert-wilders-taharrush-sexual-assault
Kepha says
While I’m here, here’s something I never, never, never thought I’d ever say in six decades of living:
I hope the Yusuf of whom Sami is Abu grows up very, very,very ashamed of his father.
vcragain says
They have been taught since baby boys that women were 2nd class people and were there ‘for men’ and showing ANY sliver of flesh says you are ‘loose’ – therefore when they get into a non cover-up country they go berserk ! I remember, when a student at a college in London UK, how dangerous the Middle Eastern male students seemed to be – my own friend had a problem with one and we both said ‘whoah – keep away from them’ ! That was 55 years ago – so I have regarded ME males as dangerous for many years – nothing has changed !
bouboulina says
Here’s fitting punishment for Sami-boy & a warning to like-minded monsters: Staple a blonde wig to his skull after a meticulous full body-waxing, sew on a falsies bikini top & bikini bottom, smear on some lipstick & neon eye shadow, ram his hooves into an oversized pair of stiletto high heels, hose him with perfume with the highest possble amount of pheromones then hurl the sorry s.o.b. into a swirling mass refugee rapists. If there’s anything left afterward & he can still manage to babble then interview him for tv to see if he’s planning on tweeking his sermons to his flock.