• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Sharia New York City: Muslim Uber driver attacks pregnant woman’s service dog

Jan 27, 2016 4:35 pm By Robert Spencer

This article doesn’t mention the most likely reason why this is happening, and that is probably because the New York Post knows that printing the truth would be “Islamophobic”: the Uber driver was Muslim, and Islam hates dogs: “Once Gabriel promised the Prophet (that he would visit him, but Gabriel did not come) and later on he said, ‘We, angels, do not enter a house which contains a picture or a dog.’” — Sahih Bukhari 4.54.50

“Abdullah (b. Umar) (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered the killing of dogs and we would send (men) in Medina and its corners and we did not spare any dog that we did not kill, so much so that we killed the dog that accompanied the wet she-camel belonging to the people of the desert.” — Sahih Muslim 3811

“Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e. about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.” — Sahih Muslim 551

Mojeh Adams Schaniel

“Uber driver attacks pregnant woman’s service dog: cops,” by Daniel Prendergast, Danielle Furfaro and Natalie Musumeci, New York Post, January 26, 2016 (thanks to Bulldog):

An Uber driver yanked a nine-months-pregnant passenger’s service dog from her and slammed the pooch onto a Manhattan street because he did not want the animal in his car, cops said on Tuesday.

The 30-year-old Manhattan woman got into Muhammad Qayyum’s cab with her dog, named Brooklyn, at around 7:25 p.m. on Broadway near West 56th Street on Jan. 21, police said.

“I will not take your dog in my car,” Qayyum, 23, told the woman, according to cops.

Mojeh Adams Schaniel told the driver that the silky terrier is her service dog, but Qayyum didn’t care. He got out of the vehicle, opened the rear passenger door and snatched the dog out of the woman’s lap by its leash and threw it to the ground, police said.

The dog suffered a dislocated hip and an injury to its right back leg, according to a criminal complaint filed with the Manhattan DA’s office.

The owner took her service dog to Blue Pearl Veterinary Partners on West 57th Street, where the animal underwent surgery, police said.

Qayyum was arrested on charges of aggravated cruelty to animals and harming a service animal in the second-degree.

He was released without bail and an order of protection was placed against him, the DA said.

The driver, in a canny and completely unprecedented move, is claiming victim status:

Qayyum denied harming the pooch and claimed that the woman punched him in the face multiple times and made “racist, religiously disparaging slurs,” said an Uber spokeswoman, who noted that all of its drivers are required to accommodate service animals.

According to the spokeswoman, Qayyum’s and the woman’s Uber accounts have been suspended pending an investigation into the matter….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic supremacism, New York City, Sharia Tagged With: Muhammad Qayyum, Uber


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Michael Copeland says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 4:51 pm

    An illustration of Islam’s INSTRUCTED contempt for man-made laws and hatred for the kuffar. The article makes it seem that it was personal to the driver.
    http://libertygb.org.uk/news/islam-instructs-hatred-muslims-speak

  2. miriamrove says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:20 pm

    I encountered this exact situation a couple of years ago and in all place at Penn Station in NYC. Some bearded muslim douche was trying to get rid of a guy who had a working dog. I ripped that a…hole to pieces. Of course he immediately said” sorry I did not know it was a working dog!! M

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 5:31 pm

      Good for you, miriam!

    • avantibev says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 11:26 am

      My dog is a member of my family. Does NOT matter whether she is a service dog or not. I am Italian American and proudly so! You don’t screw with a.member of mia famiglia.
      Harming dogs confirms my belief about Mo’s “Gabriel” REAL name. Dogs are our guardian angels and who would hate humans being sent angels? Hint: he wasn’t interested in Eve and her hubby getting more vitamin C in their diet.

  3. nacazo says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:22 pm

    She’s in danger, some people don’t obey orders of protection. He probably knows where she lives if she called the uber from home. Serial killers often start by hurting animals in their youth. If this person was able to hurt a harmless dog, he’s able to harm people.

    • PepperAnn says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:38 pm

      This isn’t a serial killer. He’s a dog hating Muslim that thinks his stinking violent beliefs dominate our laws. They’re getting more brazen every day!

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 4:39 pm

        A lot of pious Muslims *are* serial killers or mass murderers.

  4. gravenimage says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:29 pm

    Sharia New York City: Muslim Uber driver attacks pregnant woman’s service dog
    ………………………….

    And note: this Muslim didn’t just refuse to transport the dog–instead, he grabbed the dog out of his owner’s lap and slammed him into the sidewalk, seriously injuring him.

    More:

    The driver, in a canny and completely unprecedented move, is claiming victim status:

    Qayyum denied harming the pooch and claimed that the woman punched him in the face multiple times and made “racist, religiously disparaging slurs”
    ………………………….

    Oh, I’m afraid there’s *nothing* unprecedented about Muslims claiming false victim status and blaming their victims.

    As implausible as these allegations are–that a very pregnant woman would assault a man–this is is rendered even less believable because of the serious injuries to her dog.

    I just hope Uber–and the police–do the right thing here.

    I hope her poor dog makes a full recovery.

    • ballotcode says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 1:05 am

      Mohamedans are out and out liars.
      They will say anything. Can not be trusted.

      • Judyann Joyner says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 8:51 am

        It’s called Taqiyya, Muslims commanded by koran to lie, none are to be believed, not even that 7-11 clerk…commanded when inferior or outnumbered by infidels, to give the FALSE FACE of friend but keep HATRED in their hearts for all Infidels.

      • Bob says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 9:08 am

        It’s apparently acceptable to lie to a kafur, according to the Quran & Islamic beliefs.

    • TH says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 4:01 am

      And they make him pay for the recovery of the dog. See how muslims are so upset when their sensibilities are hurt and they care not about the rights of others. A sign of their infantilism.

    • Sandra Lee Smith says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 1:05 pm

      Not in months; close to a year at least, actually!I

  5. Bruce says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:33 pm

    There’s only one way to handle those creeps and it’s about time you Americans woke up to it . It’s not gonna get any better. ,so wake up

  6. billybob says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    A news story coming your way soon… “CAIR defends Muslim taxi drivers forced to transport dogs against their religious code.” “Files a million dollar lawsuit against the passenger with the dog”.

    • Katnis says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 6:15 pm

      And on the flip side, americans with disabilities are highly supported. If CAIR steps up in defense of stupid muslims and their life-hating tactics, they will have a hard time pressing against the ADA.

      Stupid, backwards muslims beating up a tiny service dog, then lying and accusing a pregnant woman of punching him. I can’t stand muslim cabbies. I refuse to give them my business.

      • Annak says

        Jan 27, 2016 at 10:49 pm

        Agree. Have used with them before, years ago,but never again.I would rather cycle, or even walk anyday now than take a muslim taxi. Even in freezing conditions or a heat-wave.Hey even with a bad back flare-up, just take rests.
        Walk until I might see a miracle : a non-muslim driver

        • Shmooviyet says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 5:26 am

          Second that agreement. We had a miserable experience with one of these drivers years ago.
          Now we are grateful for the Light Rail to the airport in Mpls., though it too can be risky.
          A good show of how much regard these men have for a pregnant woman who dares to believe she and her darling dog will be safe in his Uber. Injures the poor service animal and whines the inevitable “she insulted me” garbage to make himself the actual victim.
          The most cowardly hypocrites alive.

  7. Rhondakelly07 says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:44 pm

    Google. Bare Naked Islam watch Musliums cut heads off. Gang rape. Butchering animals everyday up dated

  8. scherado says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 5:48 pm

    The driver, in a canny and completely unprecedented move, is claiming victim status:

    Boy, did I ever need a good laugh. Thank you Robert Spencer.

  9. Angemon says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 6:45 pm

    Mojeh Adams Schaniel told the driver that the silky terrier is her service dog, but Qayyum didn’t care. He got out of the vehicle, opened the rear passenger door and snatched the dog out of the woman’s lap by its leash and threw it to the ground, police said.

    The dog suffered a dislocated hip and an injury to its right back leg, according to a criminal complaint filed with the Manhattan DA’s office.

    Poor thing… 🙁 It wasn’t enough to tell the girl that he wouldn’t take a dog. No, he had to abuse the poor animal. I bet if the passenger were a burly man with a Doberman the bastard wouldn’t have shown such “courage”. “Were to, sir? Is there anything I can do for you or your service animal that will make your journey more pleasant?”

    Qayyum denied harming the pooch and claimed that the woman punched him in the face multiple times and made “racist, religiously disparaging slurs,” said an Uber spokeswoman, who noted that all of its drivers are required to accommodate service animals.

    The dog underwent surgery, so the bastard needs to explain how the injuries happened. Plus, if he was punched, the police would have found marks. In any case, his version does not contradict the girl’s story – she may very well have punched and insulted him on the account of what he did to her service animal. Plus, if he refused to carry a service animal, Uber can claim breach of contract and kick him out with extreme prejudice.

    • Westman says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 9:35 pm

      Since the Protective Order was issued against Mo, I think we can predict which story is believed. The injured dog is another bit of evidence. Will he actually show up in court or “dissappear” like a refugee?

    • revereridesagain says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 10:46 pm

      Too bad she didn’t break his nose. Or anything else within range of a good swift kick.

      And this should be a lesson to Uber to establish and ENFORCE their rules. Would they like a lawsuit from an injured passenger any better than one from an “offended” Muslime? If they choose to back Qayyum’s taqiyya tale they deserve to be boycotted.

      • madmemere says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 2:56 am

        Liked your comment (a good swift kick), however, it would be more than a “little difficult” for a “nine-month pregnant” lady to kick anything higher than is kneecaps, if even that. However, if she had a good “hefty purse” she could have swung that, like a weapon, AND probably could have broken his nose, blacked his eyes – – just plain “done lots of damage”!!

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 2:14 pm

      Yes, he was attacked by a 9-months’ pregnant woman. Liar, liar, liar.

  10. John Johness says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 6:50 pm

    If it was a black dog then the cab driver would have really freaked as they contain messengers of the devil (Jinns) The Israelis know all this. That is why a couple of attack dogs are excellent weapon to stop the gun toting Jihadis. These Islamist have no experience with dogs and they freak when they see them.
    This is another reason to identify the terrorist as Islamic. It defines how they are defeated. But try telling that to the police.
    There are three ways to discourage Islam making your country their country 1. Wine shops everywhere and wine with food. 2 Ham shops everywhere 3. dogs as pets and guards.
    Hey wait a minute isn’t that Spain and Portugal? I wonder why!

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 2:19 pm

      Doesn’t seem to work in Spain and Portugal, they’ve got lots of Muslims. Maybe not enough black dogs. I have a black dog, and the Muslim husband of an acquaintance hid behind the desk when I went into their shop. Puppy was trying to say hello, he was only a few months old. Sothat’s why he was freaking out. I didn’t know anything about Islam then, and only learned about the dog hatred they have in the past couple years.,,but didn’t know about the black dog in particular. Maybe I need a Bouvier or a Nfld dog next!

  11. Dan says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 7:03 pm

    If he’s a Muslim cabbie, even money says he got his license via nefarious means.

  12. abad says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 8:06 pm

    Muslims should not be allowed to drive Ubers or any other taxi.

    They might drive them right into brick buildings while screeching “Allahu Akhbar.”

    • UNCLE VLADDI says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 5:28 pm

      Worse: It’s more than likely cops will never stop them at random checkpoints because they are “working,” licensed, and, as muslims, probably not drunk.

      Therefore what better way to transport WMDs around town than in the trunk of a taxi?

  13. Maire says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 8:36 pm

    It has been happening with taxi drivers too. In
    Minneapolis, they have had problems with taxi drivers refusing to pick up passengers with guide dogs. It is time to file private civil rights lawsuits against each violator. Also, citizens need to file complaints with state and local regulatory agencies. Since Obama continues to fail to protect our civil rights, private citizens need to start using the courts. There are plenty of civil rights attorneys that will file lawsuits. Tell your friends!

  14. Dave J says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 9:34 pm

    Here we see the arrogance and violence built into the ideology. Not enough to refuse service and to violate Uber’s rules, he had to molest and injure the dog.

    Such people are truly Satanic – myopic, retarded, superstitious and quite willing to commit violence.

    One of the main reasons we fail to appreciate the nature of the Islamic threat is that most Westerners cannot imagine notions like hating, really hating all dogs, hating all Jews, hating all Christians, forbidding music, beheading those who disagree, etc.

    It is so radically far from our personal ethos that we are blind to the reality of it and instead rely on wishful thinking and tolerant thoughts.

    We must not allow these nasty, duplicitous and ungrateful people to infiltrate our society. If we do they will overpower us.

  15. Expat88 says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 9:35 pm

    I lived in the Middle East for many years and they hated dogs there. They used to chase the poor stray dogs outside of the cities and throw rocks at them. They also disliked most animals and pets in general. They would “tolerate” cats, but just barely. That was because (supposedly) Mohammed liked cats. But there were many poor starving cats all around that were mostly neglected and ignored, no humane society organizations for their welfare, and many (especially women) were actually afraid of cats. If they found something like a hedgehog or other wildlife they would kill it. There was no consciousness of conservation or protection for any animal, and they had many species that had disappeared due to overhunting or just killing them. One dog that was tolerated to a certain degree was the Saluki dog. The Bedouins like them for hunting and for their herds. But it is interesting that they don’t really classify Salukis in the same category as other dogs. Also, they love to hunt with trained falcons and value them highly. They can spend a lot of money on a valuable falcon. And I would also say that they do like camels and horses. But other animals are not important. During the Haj thousands of sheep are slaughtered in the Halal way, which causes suffering for the animal, as it is a slow death.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:36 pm

      Yes–I had a friend in college who went to Turkey. He had a starving dog follow him around *for days* after he patted it on the head. He was a real animal lover and it broke his heart that he was unable to do more–he recognized that the poor animal had no friends there.

  16. Western Canadian says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 9:41 pm

    Given a choice of living in a neighborhood, city, province, country and world that bans either dogs or muslims, I’ll take the dogs. I also insist that it is MY right, and muslims can find another planet to turn into a sub-animal gutter, along the lines of every cultrure they dominate.

    • Charli Main says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 12:46 pm

      I´d choose a dog over a Muslim any day—-no contest, because you can trust a dog with your home and life, while I wouldn’t trust a Muslim with anything.

  17. Matthieu Baudin says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 9:53 pm

    “…Qayyum denied harming the pooch and claimed that the woman punched him in the face multiple times and made “racist, religiously disparaging slurs,” said an Uber spokeswoman, who noted that all of its drivers are required to accommodate service animals…”

    Lying through your teeth is just part of the game.

    Dogs, through their relationships with us, have, in a way, helped us to be more caring and considerate human beings. It used to be (and perhaps still is) a pastime in parts of Libya for children to skin stray dogs alive; something that horrified resident expatriates but raised little concern amongst the locals.

  18. 11B40 says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:05 pm

    Greetings:

    I would just like to submit this as an aside. This “service dog”concept is subject to a good bit of abuse out where I live. Many dog owners of the less than fully responsible sort have caught on to the license those words magically grant. I don’t think that there is any legitimate certification authority supervising these owners or situations. Every couple of months I seem to run into some dog owner with his emotional dependency in a store where foodstuffs are sold or served and when challenged the unsubstantiated “service dog” declaration is proffered. So, I would be interested in finding out the dog’s actually service and training.

    Again, this is not to say that this Muslim isn’t a first class jerk.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 27, 2016 at 11:49 pm

      11B40 wrote:

      I would just like to submit this as an aside. This “service dog”concept is subject to a good bit of abuse out where I live…
      ………………………….

      This is true, and is something I have noticed as well–but I don’t think Muhammad Qayyum grabbed little Brooklyn out of his mistress’s lap and savagely bashed him into the sidewalk in order to protest the too-liberal designation of “service” dogs.

      With respect, focusing on a possible picayne peccadillo on the part of the victim seems to rather miss the point here.

      • Carolyne says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 10:01 am

        Personally, I would much prefer to enter a store where there was a dog than where there was a Muslim. I love dogs. I hate Muslims. I wear that as a badge of honor.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 4:43 pm

          Hear, hear!

    • StandTall says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 1:32 am

      “Emotional Support” animals are actually specifically NOT covered by the American with Disabilities Act. Places like Wal-Mart have been told by corporate that they cannot ask if an animal is truly service-certified ……. but a tiny, shivering Chihuahua or barking/acting-out pooch is MORE than enough reason for another customer to raise holy …. with management (in front of the offender) for allowing a PET in the store …. health hazards to both food and customers who may have allergies … and the animal (AND OWNER!!) can be permanently banned from the store. (I know because I have done that!!) I’m willing to sneeze (a lot!) for a trained service animal but not for Wimpy Jones’ ‘precious Snookie’ and law-breaking owner.

      • tTheBuffster says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 10:14 am

        Yes, Stand Tall. Service animals are well trained and well behaved, so an animal that’s “acting out” is highly unlikely to be a service animal.

        Besides, even if is is a service animal, if it’s misbehaving it should be removed from the premises.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 4:49 pm

        Again, I think you are rather missing the point. The issue of dogs allowed in shops or possible overuse of the “service animal” designation is a minor, not terribly inconvenient, and decidedly first-world problem to the extent that it exists–violent Muslims attacking and abusing vulnerable people and animals is a *much* more serious issue, as anyone who has witnessed the burgeoning threat of violent Jihad terror–that is, any Jihad Watch reader–should be *well* aware of.

    • WorkingClassPost says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 am

      I have to agree with you there.

      That little pooch looks no more like a service dog than mohammy was a prophet.

      • vicki says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 8:32 am

        Your are not thinking of some service dogs that can sense when a person is going to have a seizure, low sugars, etc.. These dogs don’t need to be big brutes that can bring items to people, open doors, etc, just warn their owner trouble is about to happen

        • WorkingClassPost says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 11:41 am

          Point taken, but my comment about the likelihood of Mohound being a prophet still stands.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 4:53 pm

        There *are* small service dogs, who perform service for diabetics, epileptics, the deaf, and others. Not all service dogs are large, as are–for instance–seeing eye dogs.

        But again, I don’t this issue of whether Brooklyn is really a service dog–or just a valued companion–should be considered the main issue here.

        It is about the violent, supremacist, dog-hating Mohammedan thug.

    • Oscar says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 11:57 am

      I agree. That critter is no more a service dog than that woman is a member of the Danish Royal Family. Animal cruelty is wrong but just as wrong are those dishonest humans who fake disability to exploit legitimate legislation. Does she have a car with a fake disability sticker?

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 4:58 pm

        Oscar wrote:

        Animal cruelty is wrong but just as wrong are those dishonest humans who fake disability to exploit legitimate legislation.
        …………………….

        *Really*? Do you have no sense of moral proportion?

        Are you *really* saying that you have no more problem living in a world where some people fudge the status of their companion animals than you do a world where violent Mohammedans are assaulting pregnant women and small vulnerable animals in the name of their foul creed?

        If this is the case, why are you even here on Jihad Watch?

        • St. Croix says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 6:23 pm

          Sock it to ’em gravenimage, some comments on this thread are red herrings and have nothing to do with the issue at hand.

          Imagine if Muslims were actually in charge. There would be no debate over what kind of service dog qualifies. Dogs in most of the mid-east countries are treated horribly–poisoned, tortured, and abused in every way–just like many of the people living under the Muslims who dominate the landscape. We are FREE to have this debate over service dogs and what they are! What a glorious thing. What the Muslims are promoting, enforcing, living and spreading is the opposite of freedom, in every way you can imagine. This is the thing we need to focus on here, not be decoyed by non-issues.

        • Oscar says

          Jan 28, 2016 at 9:00 pm

          The people who need to hold something fuzzy can get a teddy bear. I doubt if a Koranic maniac would attack a teddy bear. If one does, it makes Islam look even crazier than their current behavior already does. I’ve worked with people with real disabilities and my sympathies lie with the blind person with a seeing eye dog rather than selfish phonies who want special favors. Let’s find a story of anybody attacking a real seeing eye dog. I’m just tired of irresponsible pet owners claiming service status when some large, vicious dog attacks a cop and gets shot.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 30, 2016 at 5:41 pm

          Oscar posted:

          “I doubt if a Koranic maniac would attack a teddy bear. If one does, it makes Islam look even crazier than their current behavior already does.”

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7112929.stm

          http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1687755,00.html

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 30, 2016 at 4:43 pm

          Here, here, St. Croix!

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 30, 2016 at 4:53 pm

          Oscar wrote:

          The people who need to hold something fuzzy can get a teddy bear. I doubt if a Koranic maniac would attack a teddy bear.
          ………………………….

          So you would have us change our behavior to avoid offending violent Muslims?

          More:

          I’ve worked with people with real disabilities and my sympathies lie with the blind person with a seeing eye dog rather than selfish phonies who want special favors. Let’s find a story of anybody attacking a real seeing eye dog.
          ………………………….

          Muslims regularly abuse blind people who have seeing eye dogs. How have you missed these stories?

          “Muslim cabbies turning away passengers with seeing-eye dogs”

          http://pamelageller.com/2015/10/muslim-cabbies-turning-away-passengers-with-seeing-eye-dogs.html/

          “Muslim bus drivers refuse to let guide dogs on board”

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1295749/Muslim-bus-drivers-refuse-let-guide-dogs-board.html

          Your implication that this Muslim only reacted adversely because he doubted this little dog was a service animal is absurd.

          More:

          I’m just tired of irresponsible pet owners claiming service status when some large, vicious dog attacks a cop and gets shot.
          ………………………….

          This is not what happened here at all. The dog did *not* attack the Muslim–the violent Muslim *attacked him*.

  19. islam :- the religion of con artists says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:35 pm

    It should be in the Uber drivers profile if they are muslim, this is only fair given the rape statistics

  20. Dave J says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 10:51 pm

    Uber must be pressured into listing Muslim/non-Muslim drivers for the protection of all users but especially those who may have a service dog, pet companion, be carrying alcohol, like bacon, wear a cross or be gay.

    This is now a public safety issue, thanks to the Muzzies.

  21. gary fouse says

    Jan 27, 2016 at 11:01 pm

    “It has nothing to do with Islam. The Koran states that if you kill one dog, it is as if you have killed all the dogs in the world……”

    • TheBuffster says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 10:18 am

      Good one, Gary!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 5:03 pm

      Grimly hilarious, Gary.

  22. Infidel from Down Under says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 12:59 am

    Muslims believe dogs are dirty and are to not be kept as domestic pets , but bestiality with goats and camels? Well that is quite OK, nothing wrong or abnormal about that !

    • Carolyne says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 am

      I believe Muslims are dirty and not to be kept as domestic pets.

      • WorkingClassPost says

        Jan 28, 2016 at 11:46 am

        They also have a nasty tendency to bite the hand that feeds them.

  23. ballotcode says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 2:18 am

    I’ve often thought about Mohamed’s dislike for dogs. Could it be that he was afraid of his BS being sniffed out by them?

  24. Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 2:56 am

    Nothing in the New York Post article
    http://nypost.com/2016/01/26/uber-driver-attacks-pregnant-womans-service-dog-cops/
    gives a clue as to what religion the driver is, or how the passenger would know his religious affiliation.
    But the driver claims that the passenger punched him in the face multiple times and made “racist, religiously disparaging slurs.” What, exactly, according to the driver, are the “religiously disparaging slurs” that he had to endure? Was he accused, for example, of being a grievance-mongering Episcopalian?

  25. Robert MacLean says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 4:39 am

    This is a daily occurrence in the UK with Muslim ar*seholes refusing to carry guide dogs for the blind as well. And it’s not just taxi’s it can happen with any service vehicle driven by a Muslim, buses included. Some of our cities now have a Muslim majority and in those places the authorities will not take action against a Muslim. America still has time to deal with Muslim immigration – but not much!

  26. Singh the Sikh says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 4:45 am

    Islam hates even dogs…that on its own is evidence enough this this is a false, corrupt and morally bankrupt religion.

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 6:26 pm

      Absolutely! That would be the tip-off, if that were even the only clue we had! Alas, there are a million clues as to what Islam really is (‘false, corrupt and morally-bankrupt’ says it well).

  27. Shyam Kumar says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 4:50 am

    http://hinduexistence.org/2016/01/28/will-arrested-sharia-law-makers-of-isis-thread-be-served-with-pork-dishes-in-indian-jails/

  28. Laura says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 5:11 am

    Why have we allowed muslims to take over taxis in almost every major town and city in the ?

  29. Laura says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 5:14 am

    Why have we allowed muslims to take over the taxis in almost every major town and city in the world, and why do we put up with all the inconvenience that comes from being driven by a primitive?
    What happened to the happy, chatty cabbie?

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 5:00 pm

      Good question, Laura. I don’t drive and take a cab at least once a month.

      Most Muslim drivers–the majority here now–are morose and surly, particularly towards women.

      And while I don’t have dogs, I’ve had Muslim cabbies try to refuse service to cats in carriers, as well.

      When I get a rare friendly Infidel cab driver–one who wants to talk about the weather, the local sports teams, or the upcoming election–anything at all–I’m just thrilled. Just a few years ago, they used to be the norm.

  30. WorkingClassPost says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 5:32 am

    Continuing this doggy theme…

    Like most Westerners, I have always dismissed the Eastern concept of reincarnation pretty much out of hand, but I circumstances have forced to reconsider this orthodoxy and now conclude that may not be as preposterous as at first it appears.

    Given the Law of conservation of energy, which states that:- ‘Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it transforms from one form to another.’ – surely we must consider what happens to our energy/life-force when we die, and the idea of spiritual ascendancy or imprisonment needs to be considered.

    We know what mohamad became, but what happened to that child of God that he was born as?

    Those who believe in hell and satan will have their view, but could the mo be returning to earth as a dog?

    This would explain his obsessive reaction to man’s best friend. I know he also hated many other creatures but his feelings towards pigs, for example, was not unusual (and probably fostered by his stay with the Jewish tribes of Medinah), but why pick on dogs, man’s best friend?

    OK, his fantasy jibril didn’t materialize once and he blamed that on a dog, but could this not all have been the result of his realization, as he looked into their eyes, that he would be condemned to walk the earth in furry paws, for as long as such sick crimes as he propagated are carried out in his name?

    And, then the irony, that every muslim now hates and hurts dogs at every opportunity…

    Talk about Karma!

  31. ich says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 8:21 am

    He was released without bail and an “order of protection: was placed against him, the DA said.

    WTF

    who cares beat him anyways

  32. Judyann J says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 8:54 am

    Get over it members of Islam – We care more about our dogs and pets who conduct themselves in a way deserving more respect than savages who refuse to evolve as a race of (sub) humans

  33. Bukkdem Jizheads says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 10:04 am

    Has anybody see Bo or Sunny with the Obamas?

    • Sandra Lee Smith says

      Jan 28, 2016 at 1:02 pm

      Not in months; close to a year at least, actually!

  34. von says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 12:00 pm

    This brave Mohammedan showed no compassion ( I doubt that the word compassion ,exist in the Arabic vocabulary) for a pregnant young lady ,and her beautiful canine companion .Nobody is surprised by the intolerant moslem POS’ reaction. In the old tradition of an eye for an eye , this fearless fellow should be introduced to an American with a bad attitude, namely a pit bull that will attack on command , preferably when the swine’s out of his cab performing an arse lifting session.

  35. UNCLE VLADDI says

    Jan 28, 2016 at 5:31 pm

    Here’s some devout muslims showing the typical islamic attitude towards dogs:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Saat25_uQc0

    Here’s them demonstrating their attitude towards cats:

    http://freedompost.org/islam/animal-cruelty/four-muslims-behead-a-cat-for-fun.html

  36. Marty says

    Jan 29, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    Not that any more evidence was required, but this is another example of inbred muslim cowardice. This slug wouldn’t have attacked a german shepherd. Did uber fire this miserable excuse for a human being?

  37. Karl Stein says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 1:08 am

    eND THE mUSLIM PROBLEM BY GETTING RID OF THE mUSLIMS.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Naildriver on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.