This special edition of The Glazov Gang presents The Stephen Coughlin Moment with Stephen Coughlin, the co-founder of UnconstrainedAnalytics.org and the author of the new book, Catastrophic Failure.
Stephen discussed 13 Hours – Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, focusing on a few crucial things not covered in the film.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch The Stephen Coughlin Moment: The “Countering Violent Extremism” Deception, in which Stephen unveiled how the CVE narrative was fostered by the Muslim Brotherhood -– and how it negates countering terror: CLICK HERE.
[The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program. Please donate through our Pay Pal account, subscribe to our YouTube Channel and LIKE us on Facebook.]
somehistory says
hillary got with the oic for the istanbul process and said she would be working on a *shaming* of Americans in order to stop anyone saying anything about islam that moslims, the oic, the mb, isna, etc., don’t want to be said.
hillary was in charge of the state dept and had the human authority to do something about what was happening.
Since up to that time, shaming was not working as she planned, not fast enough for moslims and their organizations for subjugation, there had to be something more. Terrorism, death, and esp of those who might have the weapons to counter the terror just might be the ticket to get people to stop talking about the evil that is islam and submit to being shamed into silence if one didn’t wish to be killed into silence.
The evil wild beast that is islam, its false prophet, its evil image will soon be destroyed. All who support it will find out that it is not all-powerful. It is a tool of satan the devil, whose days are numbered.
wtd says
Makes one wonder what favors these Islamic interests are purchasing:
Jan. 20th: Sources close to Hillary Clinton’s Beaumont fundraiser say it was one of her highest moneymakers
Note how 12NewsNow characterizes the transaction as between 2016 US presidential contender, Hillary Clinton and a Pakistani businessman….not an American businessman.
Telling, is it not?
Angemon says
The film is an adaptation of a non-fiction book. Hillary stated she won’t see the film because she’s busy campaigning. She also stated that, whatever questions people have after seeing the film, it’s a “dramatization”. The cognitive dissonance is mind-damaging.
Flyboy says
Excellent analysis from a world-class expert in Islamic law and war doctrine. It is clear that whoever held back the order to deploy “spun up” forces did so at the expense of those who were fighting jihadists on the ground in Benghazi. Was the failure to do so a result of negligence, incompetence or malintent? The fact that this question persists to this day answers Hillary’s question of “what difference does it make?”
Bill says
There were some interesting and informative details in Mr. Coughlin’s piece. But from the start, most thinking people understood that the State Department/White House Benghazi narrative was at best an exaggeration if not a downright lie intended to silence growing strains of criticism about Islam in the United States. Of course, aided by mainstream media, the lie gained more currency than it ever should have if the mainstream media were not so fully joined at the hip with Obama and Hillary. The “equivalence device” has been used by the Government and the lapdog media for over a decade, but used with increasing frequency and intensity by the Obama Administration. I cannot understand the governments odd relationship with radical Islam, but I have always viewed the use of the “equivalence device” as an intended and well-orchestrated assault on our rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and Constitution. Clearly, the 1st Amendment was targeted. First, shut people up and intimidate them so that they do not shed light on the government’s unholy alliance with Islam and make them feel guilty about even asking questions. This card was played relentlessly by Mayor Bloomberg, his Democrat allies and most of the mainstream media in the attempt to ram the Victory Mosque plan down everyone’s throat. Next, the 4th Amendment was targeted. The government equivalence theory makes everyone a potential threat. So government will not profile.since to government the threat is nondescript. Instead, they will get everyone accustomed to being searched and monitored. Now the same device is being used to eviscerate the 2nd Amendment. The government now calls acts of Islamic terror committed on our shores to be “domestic terror” and is just another manifestation of, and equivalent to, generic “gun violence”. The government and media claim that we have more to fear from equivalent right wing domestic terrorists than we do Islamic terrorists. The media didn’t even blush when it drew equivalence between the “extreme” speech of Pamela Geller and the Jihadi Garland attack.The politicians piled on. That was a “twofer” for the media. They got to campaign for First Amendment constraints and rail out against gun violence at the same time. For years, Ft. Hood was officially treated as workplace violence until it only recently became convenient for the White House to stop treating it that way. Islamic terrorists did not kill people in San Bernadino, guns killed people. Every Islamic terror attack on our shores is now used as a basis to pursue a government program of “gun control” eventually aimed at civilian disarmament. Whatever cozy relationships our government has with Islam, I believe that most of the actions of the government as it relates to threats posed by Islam are being used to condition the public to accept the erosion and elimination of rights guaranteed by the Constitution. How convenient for government. European citizens are already in thrall to their governments. US citizens are next on the list.
billybob says
Of course they had to stage that Benghazi incident to support the narrative in support of the UN resolution to promote a global blasphemy law. The jig is up! Word has leaked out on the internet that Muhammad was worse than a pedophile, far worse, and that Islam is a degenerate and violent political ideology. There is no way to put the worms back in the can. Speech must be muzzled to serve the greater cause.
billybob says
I didn’t intend my comment below as a response to your cogent piece. This is my response…
Whatever cozy relationships our government has with Islam, it seems the European and British politicians share that relationship – right up to the Pope. I just don’t get it. All these people employ researchers who would know the Truth about Islam, only of course these aforementioned don’t want to hear that. Instead they keep their researchers busy finding some way for them to perpetuate their delusions.
I remember back when Charlie Hebdo was attacked for the Muhammad cartoons. If there was ever a time to stand up for free speech, that was it. When the bully is trying to tell you what you can say and what you can’t say, all concern about collateral damage such as hurting somebody’s feelings go out the window. We MUST stand up to the bully. It was use it or lose it, as far as free speech goes at that moment.
So what happened? Though the the Islamic terrorist murder was reported by every news outlet in the world, almost none of them showed the cartoon that sparked the attack. That was surreal – reporting on a cartoon that shocked the entire planet without actually showing it. It would be understandable the many media outlets would likely have felt intimidated, but here was an opportunity for them to pull together, consult one another as they sometimes do on policy, and all show the image at once, all across the world. That would have been such a powerful statement, and there is no way the terrorists could have retaliated against every newspaper in the West, if not across the planet. It was a lost opportunity.
Wayne says
It would seem to me that the Globalist idea of an overpopulated planet has a lot to do with their intent on importing potential jihadists. The thought of a civil war on American soil is appalling to the average, uninformed voter. The progressive movement (Hillary as it’s current desciple) is all for “diversity”, which is sure to breed civil unrest and they know it.
RonaldB says
“Whatever cozy relationships our government has with Islam, it seems the European and British politicians share that relationship…”
You bring up a good point.
As Coughlin pointed out, it was not only the Obama administration and its minions that sought to misdirect the response to Islamic terrorism so as to trample the liberties of US citizens. It was in the Bush administration that a lexicon for describing terrorism completely apart from Islam was developed.
And, in Britain, Germany, Austria, Sweden, France, Holland, and Belgium, the governments are actually repressing criticism of the current Muslim invasion.
So the big question is, what is causing such a uniform blindness and collaboration with Muslim invasions and infiltration? It’s not only Obama, or Clinton, or Bush or one or two others. It’s across the board on Western governments, which may now be considered the enemy of their peoples.
I can think of a few possibilities:
1) The welfare states have encouraged the proliferation of diverse and inferior people who otherwise would not have been able to survive or reproduce: thus, the electorate is simply not responsive to incidents such as Benghazi: they don’t know and they don’t care;
2) The huge mega-governments with their many restrictions on the electoral process have selected for sociopathic individuals who have no principles other than winning elections and getting a “little something” for themselves;
3) Wealthy hubs of Islamic expansion, such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai, etc. have developed long-term methods of systematically preempting the political and educational processes in Western countries through huge infusions of cash investments, donations, and honoriariums. The Bush and Clinton families are publicly linked to Saudi payments and investments. Schools such as Georgetown University are openly funded by Saudi donations. I’m sure the same processes occur in other countries.
underbed cat says
Thanks for the recommendation of this movie…now I just have to get courage to view it. As you state, there were security requests made prior to the 9/11 anniversary date, a predictable time frame for trouble, this came out during an investigation that was presented by C-span, of the numerous requests. I thought that information would quickly expose the problem, but the it seems the mb influence is so pervasive, and they have the power. What I didn’t know for sure was if they could have helped…in time.
Just today, I listened to a military spokesperson announce that isis has nothing to do with islam, and no bearing on the destruction of another Christian Church in the ME and my heart sank and my anger grew.
Add to that, Obama flies into Flint, MI the illusionary hero ,to destroy another Mayor who may have been deceived, but who knows just yet the facts of how the lead was never detected, in the river… so .and how it came to such high levels….maybe another “act out” event…..I certainly hope to hear of an investigation that is not restricted from also investigating terrorism. But in Michigan that may be a hard call.
Michael Collins says
Excellent performance Stephe. I have a concern though. I found myself unnerved and distracted by the wall coverings in the background. They remind me of the the headgear (Keffiyeh) uber-terrorist yasser arafat wore to symbolize “palestinian nationalism”.
From Wikipedia:
‘Traditionally worn by Palestinian farmers, the keffiyeh became worn by Palestinian men of any rank and became a symbol of Palestinian nationalism during the Arab Revolt of the 1930s.[5][6] Its prominence increased during the 1960s with the beginning of the Palestinian resistance movement and its adoption by Palestinian politician Yasser Arafat.[5]
The black-and-white fishnet pattern keffiyeh would later become Arafat’s iconic symbol and he would rarely be seen without it; only occasionally would he wear a military cap, or, in colder climates, a Russian-style ushanka hat. Arafat would wear his keffiyeh in a semi-traditional way, wrapped around his head via an agal. He also wore a similarly patterned piece of cloth in the neckline of his military fatigues. Early on, he had made it his personal trademark to drape the scarf over his right shoulder only, arranging it in the rough shape of a triangle, to resemble the outlines of historic Palestine. This way of wearing the keffiyeh became a symbol of Arafat as a person and political leader, and it has not been imitated by other Palestinian leaders.
Another Palestinian figure associated with the keffiyeh is Leila Khaled, a female member of the armed wing of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Several photographs of Khaled circulated in the Western newspapers after the hijacking of TWA Flight 840 and the Dawson’s Field hijackings. These photos often included Khaled wearing a keffiyeh in the style of a Muslim woman’s hijab, wrapped around the head and shoulders. This was unusual, as the keffiyeh is associated with Arab masculinity, and many believe this to be something of a fashion statement by Khaled, denoting her equality with men in the Palestinian armed struggle.
The colors of the stitching in a keffiyeh are also vaguely associated with Palestinians’ political sympathies. Traditional black and white keffiyehs became associated with Fatah.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keffiyeh
mortimer says
Stephen Coughlin (major-retired) is one of the best-informed Americans on the subject of jihad. The SPECTACULAR FAILURES of the US government counterjihad policy show not only that Coughlin has been right all these years, but that the US government should re-hire Major Coughlin and listen to him NOW!
underbed cat says
I agree Mortimer, Major Coughlin would have been a great benefit, and his information could have saved many soldiers lives, and the lives of those from other countries. However there is a problem, the current administration is adverse to the details, so any advice, information would be resisted and the facts would be denied. It truly makes you wonder who is walking around in the building. It may be hard to organize a strategy for a world wide ummah that has been ushered in upon the world. First a recognition of the organizations of the “mother ship of bad information, a study of the methods and deception, that has tons of money and dreams of a caliphate would need to be understood.
Unless they are secretly learning, we can only hope.
Jay Boo says
Found this little nugget (linking to the NY Times) at the Libyan Embassy website.
—- Forget about Benghazi what about Libya —-
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/24/opinion/forget-benghazi-what-about-libya.html?_r=1
Capitalist Dad says
Interesting use of Judicial Watch material. It seems to be able to pry information from Big Brother that eludes the (In)Justice Department, congressional investigators, and various inspectors general. There is no question that Obama and Clinton have the blood of brave patriots on their hands. Any government worthy of the name would have tried to move heaven and earth to relieve the defenders. Instead our Dear Leader and his odious sidekick Dear Leader Wannabe elected to spend their time cooking up a political deception instead of using it to get support to the men in the firefight. Finally, please be more precise in your language. The State Department and White House didn’t swap known facts for a “narrative.” They swapped known facts for a lie.
pennant8 says
Stop and think about it. Obama and Hillary essentially enlisted two branches of our enemy [OIC & ISNA] to help push a story that gave some twisted rationale for an attack on an American diplomatic outpost by by a third branch of our enemy [al Qaeda and ansar al sharia]
I think there was a book called “None Dare Call It treason.” Time for a sequel.
Paul Middleton says
You don’t read Stephen’s “Catastrophic Failure, Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad” – you don’t know jack chit!
underbed cat says
A lie to the public by the officials bothers me, but is almost expected when things go badly, What really is disturbing is knowing that there was an apparent lack of planned security,(considering that it was a 9/11 anniversary) unfilled requests, and a apparent stand down to rescue. A lie about the cause, of terrorism in the middle east and never understanding the roots…never identifying the writing and verses that give direction in the religion to jihad that is excused over and over ..is really extremely disturbing.
gravenimage says
I plan to see it.