• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Sweden to deport 80,000 Muslim migrants, Finland 20,000

Jan 30, 2016 6:26 pm By Robert Spencer

The “Welcome Refugees” crowd is still in power all over Europe, and will be for the foreseeable future, but reality is beginning to break through, due to the out-of-control savagery of Muslim migrants all over Europe on New Year’s Eve, and so very many other incidents. They thought they could come into Europe and apply Islam’s rules for the seizing and sexual use of Infidel women, and to a shocking degree, they can, so weak and emasculated are European authorities.

refugees8

“Finland To Follow Sweden In Expelling Nearly 20,000 Migrants,” RFE/RL, January 29, 2016 (thanks to Plamen):

One day after Sweden disclosed plans to deport up to 80,000 migrants, a senior official said Finland expects to expel nearly 20,000 migrants out of the 32,000 who sought asylum there last year.

Interior Ministry Secretary Paivi Nerg said the Nordic nation expects to reject the asylum applications of nearly two-thirds of those who applied in 2015, compared with a 56 percent rejection rate in 2014.

“In previous years around 60 percent [of applicants] received a negative decision but now we have somewhat tightened our criteria for Iraqis, Afghans, and Somalis,” she told AFP.

In 2015, Finland made it more difficult for migrants from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia to get asylum, concluding that the security situation had eased in those countries.

About 20,000 of Finland’s asylum-seekers in 2015 came from Iraq.

Nerg said two charter flights to deport Iraqis are planned within months. She said the deportations will take place gradually, as immigration authorities process applications.

The ministry will set up separate transit centers for those who leave voluntarily and those who must be forced out, she said.

About 4,000 asylum seekers have already withdrawn their applications, she said.

Swedish officials told Swedish media on January 27 that they expect to deport up to half of last year’s record 163,000 asylum seekers. Many of those expulsions also will be forced by the authorities, although they are seeking voluntary compliance….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Eurabia, Finland, immigration, Sweden Tagged With: Paivi Nerg


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. RT says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 6:35 pm

    Charter flights. Hear that Obama? Much cheaper than generational welfare, mass rape and murder, and loss of culture. Trump sounds like a real winnner as the days grow closer to election. Liberal losers and their ridiculous multiculturalism.

    • PK says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 8:38 pm

      These immigrants are from tribal nations. It is apparent that the “free” world doesn’t fully understand the implications of such.

      The rampant “group mentality” of some/many Muslim men leads me to ask WHY women in Muslim countries wear abayas, chadors, burqas? It may not merely be to follow the “Islamic” Koranic traditions. Think about this!

    • nicu says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 10:35 pm

      Well said !!!

      I hope they do it – but am afraid germany will take them 🙁

      Our planes are mostly empty when people get deported …

      • Oliver says

        Feb 1, 2016 at 6:11 pm

        Feb 1, 2016

        I just read that IN Germany (hey,m what about their great technology?) ABOUT 50% OF THE REFUGEES ADMITTED IN 2015 HAVE DROPPED FORM THE RADAR SCREEN.

        So, where are they? (A guess-collecting freebies under another name in another city; or else preparing more rapes; murders and other crimes).

        • Oliver says

          Feb 1, 2016 at 6:11 pm

          Note, this was on DRY BONES, with attributions.

        • Diana says

          Feb 2, 2016 at 3:43 am

          It’s thought that some of them never existed in the first place. They were claiming triple identities in order to give themselves more options and benefits. While the spare identities “exist” separately on computer data bases, they do not represent extra bodies walking around Europe.

  2. Angemon says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 6:38 pm

    Meh. I’ll believe it when I see it. Just in case “deporting” actually means “deporting” and not “send them to another European country who is not fulfilling their refugee quotas”.

    • underbed cat says

      Feb 1, 2016 at 12:14 pm

      Watch out, our leader may take them, he could hand them a voters registration card to mail when they get back home.The news does not expose too much of what has happened to ( crimminalization of free (truthful) speech) Europe, it should be everywhere in the news, the problems are immense, I have not seen too much information, and of course the m organizations, liberals crying racist….so does the majority voting public have a clue or is it just for the internet readers of JW, FPM, CjR,B, AS/PG etc or information sights.

  3. Wakeup says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 6:42 pm

    In a parallel universe.

  4. Jan Aage Jeppesen says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 6:51 pm

    Latest: Austria will deport 50,000 asylum seekers over the next three years.

    The tipping point has been passed.

    • Oliver says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 8:14 pm

      which , comes to- just under 17,000 per year-comes to 1,400 per month. (1,416 and a fraction so say 1,417);

      And, if there is a new election- and leftists win, this will probably die a silent death. the leftists need the votes

      with the high Muslim birth rate- unless the ones deported are the young single males-which i would doubt- the Muslim population would increase. And, as i asked elsewhere- are these Muslims or including Christians who are being persecuted.

  5. cs says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    Owwwiiiiinnnnn why deport? They are so cute!!!! Stuff them in the public buildings, we need their cultural enrichment and scientific expertise.

    • Pathfinder0100 says

      Jan 31, 2016 at 3:11 pm

      Hey cs!! Do I detect a lil sarc there friend??? LOL :>)

  6. cheryl s. says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:02 pm

    Too little to late. If they were really serious, they could deport every muslim within one month and shutter every mosque.
    And btw, western nations are not replacing themselves. They had better smarten up and beef up their and start having babies. lots of them. It is their zero population growths that have gotten them into this bad position.

    • Jan Aage Jeppesen says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 7:21 pm

      Yes, that is the fucking truth!

    • Diana says

      Feb 1, 2016 at 7:30 am

      The declining population of indigenous Europe is partly sexual and partly economic.

      The loss of interest in traditional marriage and children cannot be fixed by government policies. That’s a task for the churches. There are no commitment-phobic men in churches, and Christian couples are still producing sizeable families.

      The immense economic difficulties of starting a family can and should be tackled by the governments. Education is taking longer and longer. Nobody has any money before the age of 25. The price of real estate is astronomical (and artificially so) and of course immigrants are entering Europe faster than new houses can be built. So until the property market collapses to realistic prices, young couples won’t be able to afford to have children even if they want to.

      Bringing in more and more immigrants to support the “ageing population” never was much of a solution to the problem, and it’s becoming an increasingly silly solution now.

  7. Oliver says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:22 pm

    The way I read the article, IT DOES NOT SAY MUSLIM REFUGEES.

    ADMITTED: FROM AFGHANISTAN AND SOMALIA- ALMOST DEFINITELY MUSLIM.

    But Syria and Iraq have (or, rather, had) Christian populations. Are many of the (I am guessing at least some percentage of refugees form these two countries are Christian; used to be large Jewish populations in these countries also, but they were expelled in 1948)..

    So, my question- are they also expelling/deporting the Christians WHO -FROM JW and other sources, are persecuted?

    Are they deporting the YOUNG MALES, WITH CELL PHONES- the ones most likely to rape, murder, etc?

    Asking.

    • Diana says

      Feb 1, 2016 at 7:32 am

      While the populations of Iraq and Syria have traditionally been about 10% Christian, it is thought that Christians are only about 1% of this round of immigrants.

      The Barnabas Society has produced frightening anecdotal evidence of why this is. It seems that Christians are too much afraid of their Muslim neighbours to enter even the refugee camps, let alone to undertake the journey to Europe.

  8. Daniel Triplett says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:25 pm

    They still believe they can actually sort out the fictional “good” Muslims from the bad ones.

    As our grandfathers understood when trying to sort out good Germans and Japanese from the bad ones, it’s impossible. So we bombed every German and Japanese man, woman, and child in sight until they surrendered unconditionally. We wouldn’t have won the war if we didn’t.

    The European terms should be a forced choice for ALL Muslims between:

    1. Formal taqiyya/tawriya/kitman/muruna-proof apostasy; then get a job

    2. Deportation

    3. Death

  9. David says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:34 pm

    What occurred today at the Stockholm Train Station is what occurs when the government isn’t willing to enforce the law. Remember Enzo the Baker from the Godfather. People can’t go to the police because they won’t do anything.

  10. dragaozao says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:35 pm

    There is one thing I disagree in this article: the sentence: “and will be for the foreseeable future”. Keep your eyes in Sweden. You will probably see a nazi party coming to power. Things are going to change, For the better? I doubt. Europe will be less free, less tolerant and less democratic. But, democracy in Europe is dying anyway so… A gift from the crazy left to future generations.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2016 at 8:34 pm

      dragaozao wrote:

      You will probably see a nazi party coming to power.
      …………………………..

      Ah, the usual–Muslims rob, rape, and murder Infidels, but the “real” problem is fictional Nazi “Islamophobes”. Good grief…

      • Pumbar says

        Feb 1, 2016 at 5:11 am

        It does make wonder, and sometimes weep.

      • Diana says

        Feb 1, 2016 at 7:37 am

        Actually the Nazi xenophobes ARE a problem. They are not as numerically large as the Muslims but their menace is equally real.

        And I am indeed afraid of what happens if those Nazis comes to power. They are highly likely to be voted in by accident. For example, the UKIP is not officially racist. They want to stop immigration and make existing immigrants obey the laws, but they don’t discriminate on grounds of race and they don’t promote destroying the weak and disabled. Unfortunately, it’s exactly the kind of party that attracts people who really do espouse Nazi values. They infiltrate (the same way that ISIS infiltrates the immigrants) and it will be impossible to weed them all out.

        It’s only too likely that the UKIP will win the next election, do some good work in dealing with Britain’s current problems, be voted in for a second term … and that the new Hitler, whoever he or she is, will become the second UKIP Prime Minister.

        • pumbar says

          Feb 1, 2016 at 10:05 am

          I think the Liebour party is much more attractive to the average authoritarian Nazi. It even has a virulent stream of anti-Semitism running through it.

        • Jack says

          Feb 1, 2016 at 10:16 am

          Diana, you are SPOT ON. This isn’t the danger of criticising Islam and being labelled an ‘Islamaphobe’ or ‘Nazi’ by the far left, its the danger of the few people who DO indeed hold the same values as the Nazis and the hard far right taking advantage of these events and using that to get into power themselves. I think at the moment, it would still be very hard for that to be possible, especially as most people in the west definitely do not hold these values, however if events take just the right twists and turns, I could easily see this happening, replacing when one cancerous growth with another.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 1, 2016 at 4:03 pm

          Diana posted:

          “Actually the Nazi xenophobes ARE a problem. They are not as numerically large as the Muslims but their menace is equally real.”

          Nice false equivalence.

          “And I am indeed afraid of what happens if those Nazis comes to power. They are highly likely to be voted in by accident.”

          “By accident”? Diana, I can assure you that if a nazi-like party ever gets voted into power it won’t be by accident. It will be because the parties who were in government before them have ignored the threat and mayhem caused by muslims, like the “Syrian” “refugees”, and instead punished the people calling attention to it.

          “For example, the UKIP is not officially racist. They want to stop immigration and make existing immigrants obey the laws, but they don’t discriminate on grounds of race and they don’t promote destroying the weak and disabled. Unfortunately, it’s exactly the kind of party that attracts people who really do espouse Nazi values. They infiltrate (the same way that ISIS infiltrates the immigrants) and it will be impossible to weed them all out.

          It’s only too likely that the UKIP will win the next election, do some good work in dealing with Britain’s current problems, be voted in for a second term … and that the new Hitler, whoever he or she is, will become the second UKIP Prime Minister.”

          That doesn’t add up. If the UKIP is not a nazi party and doesn’t espouse nazi values, why would the second UKIP PM be the new Hitler?

        • Diana says

          Feb 2, 2016 at 3:21 am

          Angemon, why is it false equivalence to claim that one mass-murderer (Hitler) is equivalent to another (Muhammad)? The Nazis are not an immediate danger to our society because they are so few in number, but it would be wrong to say that they could never be a danger again.

          If a Nazi-like party is voted in at this point, it won’t be because most people support Nazis but because most people perceive them as the solution to our current problems. I call that an accident. You might think it a preventable accident insofar as today’s politicians ought to be doing a better job. But since there is little we can do to change our politicians, it seems we’ll either continue on our current path … or have the political accident.

          And as I’ve said, the UKIP may not be officially Nazi, but it most definitely attracts Nazi-types. Take a look at this. I found that 25% of the “racist” remarks were legitimate expressions of opinion and another 25%, while strange, could not be deemed harmful without knowing more about the context. But 25% were definitely inappropriate and the remaining 25% were outright racist in the true sense of the word.

          http://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/is-ukip-a-racist-party-these-15-comments-would-suggest-so/

          So far the UKIP has tried to weed out the racists, but sooner or later a few clever ones will not only infiltrate but realise what they have to do to avoid being identified. After all, most Germans in 1933 – even those who carried the Nazi membership card – were not consciously in favour of genocide. But they managed to vote in Hitler anyway.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 2, 2016 at 8:17 am

          Diana posted:

          “Angemon, why is it false equivalence to claim that one mass-murderer (Hitler) is equivalent to another (Muhammad)? ”

          That’s not what you wrote. You wrote

          Actually the Nazi xenophobes ARE a problem. They are not as numerically large as the Muslims but their menace is equally real.

          I don’t see nazis pulling the crap muslims pull on a daily basis on a worldwide scale. There are no nazi groups worldwide committing terror attacks against innocent civilians, and there certainly isn’t a nazi group holding a large swath of land, butchering people in increasing horrific ways and calling for terror attacks in Western nations to move the nazi agenda forward. Were the San Bernardino killers nazis? Were the people who molested German women in Cologne nazis?

          You could get away on an abstract level saying that Nazism and islam are equally dangerous ideas, but saying that nazis today are as menacing as muslims? That’s silly, to say the least.

          “If a Nazi-like party is voted in at this point, it won’t be because most people support Nazis but because most people perceive them as the solution to our current problems. I call that an accident.

          If people willingly vote on someone who espouses nazi-like values because they see those values as a solution for the problem they have, it’s not an accident. It’s a wiling choice.

          “And as I’ve said, the UKIP may not be officially Nazi, but it most definitely attracts Nazi-types.”

          Huh, so what? Do those nazi-types write the party rules?

          “Take a look at this. I found that 25% of the “racist” remarks were legitimate expressions of opinion and another 25%, while strange, could not be deemed harmful without knowing more about the context. But 25% were definitely inappropriate and the remaining 25% were outright racist in the true sense of the word.

          http://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/is-ukip-a-racist-party-these-15-comments-would-suggest-so/”

          A left-aligned blog calling the UKIP racist? Stop the presses: dog bites man story. Not to mention that most of those 15 comments are not racist to begin with. For f***’s sake, saying that the UK should stop foreign aid because they have a large foreign debt was considered racism? Talk about scrapping the bottom of the barrel…

          Fun fact: according to that blog, you, Diana, are a racist, since you equated muslims and nazism. Look at this statement that blog denounces as racism:

          the nazis; a warning from history-is there any difference between the islamic ideology and the nazis?

          “So far the UKIP has tried to weed out the racists, but sooner or later a few clever ones will not only infiltrate but realise what they have to do to avoid being identified.”

          Again, nazis, stealth or not, don’t write UKIP’s party lines. If they ever do, people who are not nazis will simply leave the UKIP because it doesn’t reflect the values they believe in.

          BTW, are you just worrying about a sneaky Hitler or are you equally worried that a stealth jihadi might learn that if he shaves his beard, talks about reforming islam and pretends to be a “moderate” – or even an atheist – might get voted into power and impose sharia on everyone? Remember, you equated the nazi and muslim threats – I’m certain you’re as worried with the possibility of having a stealth muslim rising through the ranks and being “accidentally” voted in as much as you are with a stealth Hitler, but I need to ask.

        • Diana says

          Feb 3, 2016 at 12:32 am

          Angemon wrote:
          I don’t see nazis pulling the crap muslims pull on a daily basis on a worldwide scale. There are no nazi groups worldwide committing terror attacks against innocent civilians … & etc.

          That’s what I meant by saying that the Nazis are not as large numerically. Not remotely. And for that reason, I agree with you that they are “not as menacing” as Islam. It doesn’t follow that they are no threat at all.

          I mention the Nazis because Nazi-like groups are currently the only non-Islamic ideology that presents much of a threat at all. Islam is the large threat; Nazi-types are the small threat; and I’m really not worrying about anyone else right now.

          Angemon wrote:
          If people willingly vote on someone who espouses nazi-like values because they see those values as a solution for the problem they have, it’s not an accident. It’s a wiling choice.

          I don’t think any non-Nazi perceives Nazi-like values as a solution to the problem of Islam. The problem arises when a group that seems to be promising a solution turns out to have Nazi values.

          Angemon wrote:
          Huh, so what? Do those nazi-types write the party rules?

          Not yet. But in the near future they might. That is what I meant by the danger of “infiltrators”.

          Angemon wrote:
          … most of those 15 comments are not racist to begin with.

          As I said, only about four of them were seriously racist. But some of the other sentiments were inappropriately expressed. Saying we shouldn’t pay money to “bongo-bongo land” is quite different from saying that we can’t afford to increase our aid budget. It indicates a nasty attitude and I wonder about the morals of a person who used language like that. The mouth speaks of the heart’s abundance.

          Angemon wrote:
          Fun fact: according to that blog, you, Diana, are a racist, since you equated muslims and nazism.

          Yes, I’m quite sure that the bloggers would consider me racist. That doesn’t alter the fact that SOME of their criticism is justified. Look at the handful of remarks that really are racist and ask why people like that want to join the UKIP.

          Angemon wrote:
          Again, nazis, stealth or not, don’t write UKIP’s party lines. If they ever do, people who are not nazis will simply leave the UKIP because it doesn’t reflect the values they believe in.

          Perhaps they will leave, but where will they go? No other similar party is politically viable. Such parties might exist but they won’t win seats in Parliament. The UKIP might well gain power first and have its party lines rewritten afterwards. Nazis have no interest in keeping election promises; they have other methods of remaining in power.

          Angemon wrote:
          BTW, are you just worrying about a sneaky Hitler or are you equally worried that a stealth jihadi might learn that if he shaves his beard, talks about reforming islam and pretends to be a “moderate” – or even an atheist – might get voted into power and impose sharia on everyone? Remember, you equated the nazi and muslim threats – I’m certain you’re as worried with the possibility of having a stealth muslim rising through the ranks and being “accidentally” voted in as much as you are with a stealth Hitler, but I need to ask.

          I’m not equally, but far more, worried about a sharia government coming to power. I don’t know whether they’ll bother to use “stealth”; most of the existing Muslim MPs don’t seem to hide very much, and the sharia preachers forming the illegal parties are even more blatant.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 4, 2016 at 2:33 pm

          Diana posted:

          “That’s what I meant by saying that the Nazis are not as large numerically. Not remotely. And for that reason, I agree with you that they are “not as menacing” as Islam. It doesn’t follow that they are no threat at all.”

          First of all, “it doesn’t follow that they are no threat at all”? Who is saying that? Again, you’re making things up and implicitly ascribing them to me, like you did with the HItler/muhammad comparison on February 2, 2016 at 3:21 am

          Angemon, why is it false equivalence to claim that one mass-murderer (Hitler) is equivalent to another (Muhammad)?

          Second, if anyone is making case that could be perceived as saying that nazis are not a threat, it would be you. You probably don’t realize it, but when you say that the Nazi menace is that they sneak into power pretending to be upright citizens you’re implying that, as things are, they have no power whatsoever. People will look at what they stand for and tell them to go take a long hike from a short peer. And that’s precisely why the number of nazis is dwarfed by the number of muslims: Nazi ideology runs contrary to Western core values, and they know that, while muslims are taught that islamic values are coming from a divine creature and that it’s their divinely sanctioned job to put them into practice.

          Second, the whole issue regarding numbers? It’s a red herring. Or is there any reason for us to think that if there were as many Nazis as there are muslims the Nazis would act in the same ways: raping little white girls for being white and non-nazis, randomly stabbing non-nazis on the street, blowing themselves up while shouting “Hitleru ackbar”, etc.?

          “I mention the Nazis because Nazi-like groups are currently the only non-Islamic ideology that presents much of a threat at all. ”

          No, they are not. There are several cultural movements totalitarian in nature who are, to put it mildly, pissing in everyone’s legs while demanding them to believe it’s raining.

          “Islam is the large threat; Nazi-types are the small threat; and I’m really not worrying about anyone else right now.”

          See above. It was not nazism who paved the ground for making islam a protected religion and muslims a protected class. I’d say that the forces who did that are more of a threat than islam and nazism.

          “I don’t think any non-Nazi perceives Nazi-like values as a solution to the problem of Islam.”

          That’s not what I said. What I said was that, if people have a problem with muslims in their neighbourhood and Nazis come up and say “We don’t like them Pakis either – vote for us and we’ll get you rid of them” people might actually vote for them.

          “The problem arises when a group that seems to be promising a solution turns out to have Nazi values.”

          Then they’d be run out in the next elections, at worse. Or do you think so badly of the British to think they’d shrug and ignore at the sight of a Hitler-esque PM?

          “Not yet. But in the near future they might. That is what I meant by the danger of “infiltrators”.”

          Are you really suggesting that the possibility of “nazi infiltrators” is as much of a menace as muslims actually committing horrific crimes?

          As I said, only about four of them were seriously racist. But some of the other sentiments were inappropriately expressed. Saying we shouldn’t pay money to “bongo-bongo land” is quite different from saying that we can’t afford to increase our aid budget. It indicates a nasty attitude and I wonder about the morals of a person who used language like that. The mouth speaks of the heart’s abundance.”

          Expressing something inappropriately is not the same as being racist. And maybe they’re using those terms because their target audience is people who are not cuffed by PC MC and who would rather hear someone call a spade a spade rather than a “one-person-operated, manually-controlled, foot-powered implement of simple and robust yet adequately efficacious ligno-metallic composition designated primarily though by no means exclusively for utilization on the part of hourly-paid operatives deployed in the agricultural, horticultural, or constructional trades or industries, as the case may be, for purposes of carrying out such excavational tasks or duties as may from time to time be designated by supervisory grades as being necessary, desirable, expedient, apposite, or germane with regard to the ongoing furtherance of the task or objective in hand or, on the other hand, underfoot, Secretary-General” (as Lord Christopher Monckton would put it).

          “Perhaps they will leave, but where will they go? No other similar party is politically viable. Such parties might exist but they won’t win seats in Parliament. The UKIP might well gain power first and have its party lines rewritten afterwards. Nazis have no interest in keeping election promises; they have other methods of remaining in power.”

          And people have other ways to get rid of dictators. Sic semper tyrannis, etc.

          I know that it’s fashionable to go about the dangers of rising “right-wing xenophobic racist extremist parties” as a counterpoint to the news of crimes being committed by muslims, especially after the invasion of “Syrian” “refugees”, but that’s just silly. You have muslims committing crimes and getting away with it, you have foreign criminals coming in and making the life of the locals a living hell, and you have governments cracking down on people who complain about muslims getting away with crimes and foreign criminals making their lives a living hell. Maybe if the parties in power started caring about their population more than they do about foreign criminals the “right-wing xenophobic racist” parties wouldn’t be on the rise.

          “I’m not equally, but far more, worried about a sharia government coming to power. ”

          But you said that the nazi are an equally real menace. Shouldn’t you be equally worried?

  11. Leslie Greco says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 7:36 pm

    Where are they being deported to? their country of origin? Or is Obama sending UPS planes to get them? I’d like to know the answer as to WHERE, if its not their country of origin????

  12. MAppeal says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 8:12 pm

    100,000 down, + 1 million to go – its a start.

  13. Oliver says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 8:28 pm

    DBM- I knew a man who was an “illegal” Mexican and deported. The facts- he was married to an American citizen; learned English and got a job (the man is big, and strong) in a nursing home, as an aide/orderly.

    This particular place had many violent people; and some people with dementia, who had to be moved.

    The man is Catholic, as is his wife. They split. They did not divorce. He had his green card.

    NOBODY TOLD HIM THAT HE HAD TO RENEW THE GREEN CARD. ( He is not well educated-but wanted and wants his children educated).

    He had a Social Security card; paid taxes; worked for the SAME nursing home for well over twenty (20+) years.

    HE ONCE GOT A TICKET- FOR NOT STOPPING LONG ENOUGH AT A STOP SIGN, at some time after midnight, when he had worked a double shift.

    That wa sit. Never arrested. Never a ticket.

    IN OVER 20 YEARS.

    Bought a home.

    Then, Homeland Security discovered he overstayed his Visa. And had not renewed his green card. And deported him.

    However, i am sure, if he was black or Muslim (or both) he could have stayed.

    So, while some, perhaps many, illegals, are scum, some are hard working people, law abiding and trying to claim the American dream- and do not know how.

    As to Muslims, those I have known, no matter how much money they had, were trash.

    Bush had an excellent chance to help these people. Congress passed a bill- IF the illegal would join the military for (I forget if it was 2 year minimum, or 3) and get an honorable discharge, be granted citizenship, and can sponsor family, who would have to meet normal criteria. He vetoed this, at the urging of some in the GOP– and the GOP wonders why they cannot get many Hispanic voters–even those who agree with them. (Admitted-off topic att the end),.

    • Kepha says

      Feb 1, 2016 at 5:58 am

      The man’s wife ought to apply for him to re-enter. US citizens have the right to petition for alien spouses, and such cases are not subject to numerical restriction.

      • Oliver says

        Feb 2, 2016 at 6:18 pm

        Kepha–he and his wife separated over 20 years ago. As far as I know, they had no further contact; and neither filed for divorce(Catholics, feel divorce is immoral-whatever)-so that will not work.

        A friend of mine heard from him a few days ago, and he said that he might be given a new green card in a few weeks.

        The point I was trying to make, not all illegals are on the take, some are hard working people, who might not have a great education, and not know how to navigate the system.

        And common sense- which is in short supply nationwide (my opinion) but especially so in the government.

  14. gravenimage says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 8:30 pm

    Sweden to deport 80,000 Muslim migrants, Finland 20,000
    ………………….

    Let’s hope it’s a start…

  15. abad says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 8:37 pm

    Good.

    Muslims simply do NOT belong in Europe.

    They can stay in their Islamic Paradise State of Syria.

  16. Voytek Gagalka says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 9:25 pm

    Is Obama and Trudeau going to admit all those expelled by Sweden and Finland for “compassionate” reasons? It would surprise me not.

  17. Westman says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 9:40 pm

    Who are they kidding? 600,00 migrants “disappeared” into Europe. They won’t be able to find most of those “deportees” let alone deport them. Still lying to themselves and the citizens.

    The only way they will get them out of Sweden is to drop all assisance payments and then they will migrate to another European country that has assistance benefits. They are not refugees, they are migrants.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 31, 2016 at 12:21 am

      Agreed. Those Muslims aren’t going back. The hijrah is for Allah. This is a fight to the death.

      All financial payments from all EU countries must stop.

  18. JAS says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 11:33 pm

    It isn’t evil or wicked to admit that pious muslims are different from normal people in 2016. They have been brainwashed their whole lives with 7th century beliefs, and behaviors that islam is still based on. 1400 years ago human life was dirt cheap everywhere, but If you happened to live in Europe, you could look forward to civilization in your distant future. But not if you lived under muslim rule. Nothing ever changes for muslims. The same ignorance, backwardness and barbaric behavior carry over from generation to generation, century after century Slavery, cruelty and beastly butchery are forever a part of islam, so don’t expect any of them to change, because they can’t and won’t.

  19. Mahendra Singh says

    Jan 30, 2016 at 11:37 pm

    The next step should be to reduce welfare payments so much
    that it is always more profifitabe to work. If they show no willingness,
    deport them.

  20. Lawrence says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 2:06 am

    Imagine if Israel deported all their own Muslim jihadis, God knows to where, you would have a hearing about it at the UN, Obama and the EU would intimidate Israel with all kinds of threats. However the precious EU and Scandinavia can do what they like. I wouldn’t bet against Obama welcoming these asylum seekers to America, he would if he could no?

    • Judi says

      Jan 31, 2016 at 6:25 am

      I agree Lawrence.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Feb 4, 2016 at 8:21 am

        Actually, there is Gaza (the Gaza strip).

        It has sea frontage, farmable land, and water wells.

        If push came to shove, the Israelis could just drop off all their jihadis over the fence into Gaza…

        Gaza is a jihadis’ armed camp anyway, so once the jihadis are there, they can be dealt with openly as the enemies that they in fact are and always have been.

        Of course, one day the Israelis – provoked beyond all reasonable endurance by ceaseless Muslim aggressions issuing from Gaza – will have to go to war with Jihad Armed Camp Gaza. When they do they would be best advised to just bulldoze the place flat and make sure that all the fleeing Muslim inhabitants are prevented from heading in any direction other than into Egypt (which *ruled* Gaza, anyway, between 1949 and 1967; a whole lot of Gazan Muslims have Egyptian connections and Egyptian relatives to begin with).

  21. jura says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 4:47 am

    There has to be two sovereign states who agree on deportation. Otherwise the results can be like this: http://tribune.com.pk/story/1003156/pakistan-refuses-to-allow-migrants-deported-from-greece-to-disembark-from-plane-in-islamabad/

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 31, 2016 at 5:14 pm

      Typical Mohammedan rejection of reciprocity.

      “We will send you millions of people who will expect to be taken in (and we will scream loudly about “human rights!” if you refuse to accept them) but we will NOT accept any of them back”.

  22. خَليفة says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 5:57 am

    The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money .” — Margaret Thatcher.

    I bet Sweden is doing this cause they don’t got the cash to pay for more refugees, NOT because of the increase in crime. The politicians are trying to save themselves.

  23. خَليفة says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 6:15 am

    I’m sure all those deported will find their way to Germany. And then take a train back to Sweden. Muslim refugees are harder to get rid of than herpes – they may disappear for a while, but then they come back at the most inopportune time with a suicide vest.

  24. Jenny H says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 8:10 am

    If all the countries of Europe adopted full fingerprinting, retinal scans and DNA testing of the migrants, if may cut down on the doubling up of the records and welfare claims. Even if the people move around using false identities, hey’d be able to determine that it was the same person under a number of false identities, even if they can’t determine where that person originally come from.

  25. denise smith says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 8:29 am

    I wonder if they are just saying that to get back votes, anyway the last lot Sweden tried to deport ran away

  26. David says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 9:26 am

    If a Civil War occurs, the Muslims have more fighting age males as a result of the latest influx then the Swedes have soldiers or police. And among these migrants are many who fought in Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, Iraq or Yemen. The Muslims are more prepared for a civil war than the Swedes.

  27. Pete says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 10:51 am

    it says whatever it says in the news, but Finnish authorities are not going to deport 20k fake refugees. I live in finland and there is evidence that our borders are lacling any kind of control. Officials say they are letting anyone in. Over 30k paperless have arrived and there are rumors of over 10k more that are in the country roaming the streets without any I.D. or control.
    Finland is buckling under the stress this amount of people place on our system. Recently, benefit and social care, education and health care cuts were made for 100000000 euros , the same amount the Finnish govt is pumping on welcoming jihadists.

    Finland as a country is finished.

    • Kepha says

      Feb 1, 2016 at 6:02 am

      C’mon, you guys made STALIN think twice about annexing you, even though he ultimately wore you guys down. Surely Finland has a bit of gumption to deal with a few Middle Eastern hoodlums.

  28. Voytek Gagalka says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 12:31 pm

    Call me if they will actually start to deport them. “Intentions” are not “deportations” yet. And that “welcome refugees” crowd no doubt will do everything in their power to reverse that “racist” (sarc.) decision. And if they will be deported, please make sure that they will not land in Northern America on their magical Persian carpets, courtesy of #Obama and #Trudeau! They are definitely not welcome here!

  29. copakeman says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 12:43 pm

    “If we can find them” should be added to all those “we will deport 80,000 muslim refugees”.
    2 planes a day, containing at max 600 refugees, that’s 600 x 7 = 4200 per week, 4200 x 52 = 48,000 per year. It would take at least 2 years to deport 80,000 muslims. Meanwhile there wound be an influx of around the same amount of muslim “refugees”. So the net amount of refugees in Sweeden will be the same as it is today (probably the same ones who were given an airplane ride home).

    Build jails, and give all refugees 2 options, return back home or go to jail, period.

  30. Mike says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 1:21 pm

    I’ll believe it when I see it.

    An Airbus A321 seats 240, if I remember (close enough, either way).

    Now, imagine that you launch a flight every time you can fill a plane to a destination. Deporting 20,000 is 83 A321s. Figure 100, because not all destinations will end up with a full flight.

    That’s two a week, for a year in FInland.

    In Sweden, it would be 8 a week, more than 1/day.

    I’ll believe it when I see it. That will happen when they’ve grown some SERIOUS balls.

    Think of the problems:

    1) Leftists.

    2) Receiving countries would need to be somewhat cooperative, i.e., heavily bribed not to make hassles about issuing travel documents, allowing flights to land, etc.

    3) Unwilling deportees in many cases. Deportees would probably need to be restrained throughout the flight. That would require aviation safety variations, probably – my guess is that you’d be talking at replacing seating by restraint systems. Imagine the problems offloading them at destination, as well – almost impossible without the cooperation of local authorities, again.

    Essentially, the alternatives to muscular deportation end up being indefinite imprisonment under very harsh conditions, with the believability that it won’t end and that the only way out is to agree to “voluntary” deportation. The Saudis and the Russians would have the believability to pull this off. The Swedes? The Finns? I don’t think so. Lots of detainees would figure that they can wait it out and they wouldn’t have the stomach to make the conditions horrible enough in the meantime. That’s exactly what is happening to the Israelis with Holot. detainees.

    Of course, the “proper” way to do this is to take crappy ships that are nearly good for the garbage, block off the control areas so that they can be remotely controlled, stuff 10,000 people on board, and send them in the direction of their presumed countries of origin, figuring that if 10% go to the wrong place, it’s someone else’s problem. We’re talking human rights violations and all the rest of it, but it is a method that would work. I don’t see Finland or Sweden doing that.

  31. Pathfinder0100 says

    Jan 31, 2016 at 3:19 pm

    It really is so good to see that some of the European Countries are waking up, isn’t it??

    • steve says

      Jan 31, 2016 at 6:40 pm

      Yes, Let’s hope they carry through on these plans and go further with others to control the cult invasion.

  32. Alpo says

    Feb 1, 2016 at 11:24 am

    Our leaders are in deep psychosis here in Finland, the puke out wildly different numbers even during the same day. So far nearly all applications that have been fully processed have been accepted, nearly all, (it was either 97.5% or 98.5%).

    Due to the very cold winter that we have here in Finland quite many illegal intruders have cancelled their applications and have already left, I do not know how immigration officers take these into account.

  33. Gaius Gracchus says

    Mar 23, 2016 at 3:20 pm

    Yes, I am a registered democrat – yes I support gay rights, women’s rights, and planned parenthood. But I still think we need to keep Muslims out of western countries – they are a threat to western civilization.
    Sure, there are some that are not a threat. But the problem is that their culture is antithetically opposed to everything we believe in. They categorically reject the cultures of the countries to which they immigrate. This is why so many do not assimilate.
    Why immigrate to a country where you despise the culture, morals, governments and institutions?
    They will not stop until they have completely decimated Western Civilization. I tell you truly, Charles Martel would be rolling over in his grave if he knew we were allowing them back in.
    (Battle of Tours, people, in case you don’t know)
    Get them out. NOW.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • James Lincoln on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Carol on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • James Lincoln on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Jayme on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • GreekEmpress on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.