The witless Express — and the even more witless UK authorities — doubtless don’t know that what Fadel Soliman is saying about beating disobedient women is straight out of the Qur’an (4:34), and so cannot by their definition be “extremist,” but that is just one aspect of the failure of those authorities. Fadel Soliman said, “After passing through two stages of non-physical interaction, the next stage must involve something physical, in order to escalate the intensity of the warning. The true implication of the spanking is to sound an alarm that the husband has passed to a new stage of serious displeasure.” That was fine with British authorities; he was admitted into the country and is touring universities, giving talks. Saudi Sheikh Mohammed al-Arefe has said: “Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight.” That was fine with British authorities, and he, too, was admitted into the country. Meanwhile, I said he was banned for saying: “[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society,” and for that, according to the UK Home Office, I was banned.
Britain, in short, has gone mad.
“Muslim preacher who ‘said husbands should hit their wives’ allowed to tour UK universities,” by Fraser Moore, Express, January 9, 2016:
Egyptian cleric Fadel Soliman has spoken at five events in the past year, in which he reportedly advocates domestic violence and outlines the “Islamic case” for sex slavery and polygamy.
At a University of Sheffield event he told more than 100 students to share his controversial videos on Facebook, according to the Daily Mail.
He also appears to have a celebrity-like following, with groups of women discussing how much they “loved” the cleric before the Sheffield event.
One young woman even travelled all the way from London just to see him in the flesh.
Mr Soliman has denied he supports domestic violence, but in one of his 30-part video series he allegedly says: ”After passing through two stages of non-physical interaction, the next stage must involve something physical, in order to escalate the intensity of the warning.
“The true implication of the spanking is to sound an alarm that the husband has passed to a new stage of serious displeasure.”
Meanwhile, the organisation CAGE – which called sick ISIS murderer Jihadi Jon a “beautiful young man”- has spoken at 13 events at universities since September.
It has even allegedly called on students to sabotage government counter-terrorism strategy Prevent.
As many as 19 universities now face an inquiry over failing to “ensure those espousing extremist views do not go unchallenged” as outlined by the scheme.
Home Secretary Theresa May – who pioneered Prevent – said the revelations show universities need to do more to stop ‘damaging, extremist rhetoric’ going unchallenged on campuses.
Jihadi John, real name Mohammed Emwazi, is believed to have been radicalised at Westminster University.
It was reported in September that the Islamic society at Westminster is “hostile”, according to a report.
But complaints about the society were downplayed or ignored by the University over fears of “appearing Islamophobic”.…

Lookmann says
Wife-beaters OK.
But…No Spencer Please, We are British!
David Scoltock says
That’s one of our problem sin the UK. We have special courts for Jewish and Islamic divorces and both religions are very sexist and anti-woman in orthodox teachings.
All religions in the UK need to be subject to our secular legal system that protects women’s rights. koranic, biblical and torah teaching on the treatment of women have no place in modern society. sikh and hindhu beliefs regarding women’s rights are no better.
Western Canadian says
Your familiarity with Jewish law is rather weak.
David Scoltock says
Nope, it’s become something of an issue in the UK at the moment with jewish women being badly treated in jewish divorce courts.
The focus on shariah courts has made people loom at other religions.
Even Israel has some serious issues with extreme, orthodox sects trying to impose views centuries out of date.
I’m hoping that Israel continues along it’s democratic, secular path and ignores this minority.
Paleologos says
I always wanted to visit Europe. I had plans on going to Ireland, London, Rome, and Berlin. My whole lineage is German.
But now, maybe that isn’t such a great idea. If you are a student of the islamic world infestation, as I am, and understand the full meaning of FITNA …
… you start to see things spinning into darkness.
When 911 occurred, I snapped to attention, read Mark Steyn’s excellent book, “America Alone,” and started following Robert’s great blog, and others.
The sad thing is that as islam spreads its ugly tentacles, we seem to be picking worse and worse leaders. Just recently, we went from Bush Sr., who did Desert Storm about right. Then we elected the great philanderer and liar, Bill Clinton, …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHlt1W83JFU
… who bombed Christians instead of muslims in the Serbo-Croatian War, and was never held accountable.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-blackmail-of-america-how-the-u-s-is-still-on-the-wrong-side-in-serbia/18307
Then we got “W,” a good hearted man who simply did not understand islam.
http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/quotes/george-w-bush-on-islam-and-terrorism–3
These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it’s important for my fellow Americans to understand that. The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself: [“]In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.[“] The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don’t represent peace. They represent evil and war. When we think of Islam we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world. Billions of people find comfort and solace and peace. And that”s made brothers and sisters out of every race — out of every race.
***********************************************************************************************************************
So, what do we have now? We have a sitting muslim POTUS who is performing 100% in the capacity of a muslim Manchurian Candidate.
What of Great Britain? Sadly, Mark Steyn, in his aforementioned book, “America Alone,” probably had it right when he pretty much said Great Britain is lost to islam, along with, possibly, the rest of Europe.
Too bad so many innocent people are reaping, and will continue to reap the fruits harvested by stupid and evil leaders.
R/
Paleologos
Westman says
It’s OK with British authorities; beat the wives, have a desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah. Just don’t say the incontrovertible truth that: Islam is incompatible with democracy because Islam doctrine calls for the overthrow of all religions and governments.
The message is clear: advocating violence against women by Muslims, as religious doctrine, is tolerated; calling for resistance against that violence by exposing the underlying doctrine, is not.
The events of the New Year celebrations should give Europe a better idea of how the sustained adolescents that Islam produces and its doctrines combine into action.
ainu888 says
This one-sided pandering is chilling. Such thought censoring happens in India too. We are expected to keep quiet so muslims are not “hurt” while they browbeat the rest of the populace into accepting their ways.
I have a question. Why are muslims so successful at bullying their way through in so many countries? Most people on this forum have come to accept this phenomenon, but what is the cause?
David Scoltock says
On the subject of india, why do the people allow the hindu concept of lower caste woemn being ok to rape without consequence?
Sometimes I wonder if the phrase “religion is poison” is a very wise statement.
ainu888 says
I would like you to find me a reference in the scriptures that allow rape of lower caste women. There is probably none. Besides, I am virtually an atheist, so I really don’t want to defend hindu practices. Religion is probably poison, but some are more toxic than others, hence the question.
nag says
@David Scoltock Yes, India has problems, and they are getting solved. I (being from India), would be just as against bringing in a Million Uneducated Indians into a country without scrutiny and control, shoved in one place so that they organize their crimes. But that is not happening. If it was, it would be relevant.
David Scoltock says
If It was up to me only Commonwealth citizens would be allowed to freely imigrate to the UK.
nag says
Why is that?
David Scoltock says
Why I’d only allow Commonwealth citizens?
Two reasons
1) They have a shared culture, the commonwealth has a history with Britain. they have served and fought alongside us in our conflicts and we have strong and broad economic and political links.
2) We owe them. It’s only fair if a person from a commonwealth nation wants a future in the UK. they should be given priority over a European, African or American.
nag says
Thought so. You don’t owe us shit. Our stolen diamond maybe, nothing more. You owe my grandfather, not me.
Culture is not as shared as you think.Heard of Rotherham?
Westman says
Violence, combined with demands, while declaring victimization is why “muslims are so successful at bullying their way”.
Most citizens want peace. Governments want to remain in power. The easiest and less expensive way, in terms of money and retaining power, is appeasement – unless the citizens are out of patience.
Have a demonstration, declare that Spencer and Geller are victimizing British Muslims, and behold: there are meetings in which it is determined to keep them out of Britain. It’s so much easier than facing more hostility from British Muslims.
Then comes more demonstrations, New Year riots, and molestations. The citizens are running out of patience. But British government still can’t allow Spencer and Geller in because that would be an admission of previous erroneous decisions compounding the current danger to reelection.
The trick for Islamists is to demonstrate and make demands short of angering the ctizens. For Europe, New Years broke the genie’s bottle.
David Scoltock says
What danger to re-election? Jeremy Corbyn has guaranteed a Conservative victory in the next general election.
Westman says
When Angela Merkel dares ask: “Are women direspected by certain groups?” then change is underway. It may have no immediate effect on elections but it will as more citizens wake up. Right now it’s as if they were in the shock of being slapped in the face; action will come later. Pegida is only the beginning. Soon enough, moderates will the majority in anti-islam demonstrations.
David Scoltock says
You know the Commonwealth is more than India right?
nag says
I do. But it does include India, which I can speak for.
Mark Swan says
You Speak for over a billion people…what a burden…what a consensus.
nag says
Mark Swan,
Yes, I Should have said “speak as”
Mark Swan says
nag…Your alright…Diplomatic …sincerely.
Ginger says
The problems lie with the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, ie Muslims.. By the way, the UK Daily Mail is reporting that a Muslim criminal court judge has been given permission by judicial authorities to preside over a sharia court. Inch by inch . . . . .
gravenimage says
This extremely disturbing story is here:
“Crown judge will rule on sharia cases in court set up by hardline cleric who led demonstration against Charlie Hebdo”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3391501/Crown-judge-rule-sharia-cases-court-set-hardline-cleric-led-demonstration-against-Charlie-Hebdo.html
The *only* good thing about this is that virtually all the posters on this story are disgusted by it.
Mark Swan says
ainu888 says…Why are muslims so successful at bullying their way through in so many countries? Most people on this forum have come to accept this phenomenon, but what is the cause?
Maybe over confidence in their reality…maybe complacency…maybe a false sense
of security…maybe hoping it is just a bad dream and it will end soon…maybe taken aback and waiting to respond to such a bizarre affront.
Maybe You’ll get a better answer in time…action produces results…is it action
You are hoping for…maybe.
Joan says
The reason the muslims are “getting away with” all this (you know my meaning in that phrase) is something hard to grasp because it does not match our view, image, idea, hope, strong beliefs, good tendencies, natural inclination to have faith in people, etc, but it is this:
The chaos, violence and disorder by muslims in every nation is WELCOMED by the governments, the leftists, UN, NWO, Catholic Church, EU, and all those for multiculturalism and diversity and a “unified global ethic.” It is welcomed because Islam will destroy the social order and the infrastructure, leaving citizenries desperate for help. There steps in the govt, big brother, and says, “We will protect you, just trust us and hand over those naughty guns, and let us put this chip in you and forfeit your freedom of religion.” Masses reply, “SURE, just save us from this terror and darkness.” In step UN, Bilderberg, Obama or whomever to set up the global government.
ISLAM is a TOOL in the hands of globalists. It “works for them” even if unfortunately distasteful and a bit messy. Why is Saudi Arabia never on list of terror nations or screened out? Why do Suadis live in luxury breaking laws and raping women in major US cities? THe cops dare not even touch them or WHite house will intervene. Becasue they are all on the SAME SIDE, for decades!!! The US, UN, Saudis work together and allow terrorism becasue it serves their goals. This you will not find on TV or in a book or probably even a blog. THE TRUTH IS WELL HIDDEN.
Mathew Solo says
A Master Politician …invisible…except for the results He helps Us produce.
Where does politicking come from…even in the age of powerful kings…those who had desires for taking the kings rights were very busy…whispering in ears and plying all manner of deceit…to win those perceived as useful to their cause…and this done even when the king’s leadership was best for those governed…the deceitful whisperers and those that listened to the whispers all knew they were wrong in wanting power…yet regardless of the facts they continue their politicking.
The origin of politics—
So it all began…
( the seal of perfection…full of wisdom and perfect in beauty )—
( I established You…You were on The Holy mountain of God [Governmental Seat] )—
( You were perfect in Your ways from the day You were created…until iniquity
[ lawlessness ] was found in You…By the abundance of Your trading [ politicking ]…You became filled with violence within and You sinned [ broke the law ]…therefore I cast You out as a profane thing out of the Mountain Of God [ government of god ] )—
( Your heart was lifted up because of Your beauty…You corrupted Your wisdom for the sake of Your splendor )—
( You defiled Your sanctuaries [ most sacred parts of holy places] by the multitude of Your trading [ politicking ] )—
Taken from — Ezekiel 28: 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.
( How have You fallen from heaven…O Lucifer…son of the morning! )—
( For You have said in Your heart…I will ascend into heaven…I will exalt my throne above the stars of God [ Angles ]…I will sit on the mount of the congregation…I will be like the Most High)—
( Who made the world as a wilderness [ uncomfortable situation: a place, situation, or multitude of people or things that makes somebody feel confused, overwhelmed, or desolate] and destroyed its cities…Who did not open the house of his prisoners. )—
Taken from — Isaiah 14: 12, 13, 14, 17
So a very powerful Spirit Being has rebelled…has been found guilty of serious crime and banished to live on this earth…He roams the earth like a hungry lion…He destroys Our efforts to live in peace among others…He imprisons both Mentally and physically those that live on the earth…He broadcasts His very thoughts through the air…humans are not able to resist this genius at mind ploys…but He is not the almighty God Who made Him…and restrains him…or He would have helped us to be completely destroyed long ago.
God’s plans for man’s future stays right On schedule and will accomplish exactly what He wants…nothing can change it….or stop God from adding many members to His family.
Politicking thrives amongst humans…for now…but its limited period of time is almost up.
Rob says
Your visa is in the mail Robert.
D Cameron
David Scoltock says
Deoends, if he’s coming to talk to racist, anti-semetic idiots like the EDL then he has no chance. It’s something Spencer doesn’t like to mention. He was invited to a rally held by the British version of the KKK. I’m fairly sure he did not realise their anti-semetic and anti-anything not white and christian stance and only knew about their anti-muslim stance.
If Spencer knew about their anti-semetic views and history of desecrating Jewish graves with swastikas it may cause problems with his relationship with Pamela Geller.
If he was speaking to the Oxford union he’d be allowed in, but he’d have to face real debate rather than blind hero-worship.
Rob says
Are you confusing EDL with BNP?
David Scoltock says
The EDL ARE the damned BNP. Most of the hard liners in the BNP left to join the EDL.
Western Canadian says
Assuming what you say is true, and you are not the first one to make such comments on this board.
VRWC member77 says
“British version of the KKK”
You mean like Al Gore Sr., the father of the former DEMOCRATIC Vice President AL Gore and the former DEMOCRATIC SENATE Majority leader Robert Byrd who was also the Grand Kleagle of the KKK.
I didn’t think the EDL were LEFT WING RACIST PIECES of GARBAGE. But then I’m quite a bit more familiar with the American political landscape than UK politics.
Rob says
Here’s a few links to situations where Robert Spencer was in head to head debate with Muslims. No preaching to the choir here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YnaCi8m8P0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjZCKQOKvoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVq37mdHHnc
Took me less that 5 mins to find these examples.
Soliman hasn’t been threatened by any Christian groups but RS has been threatened by Muslims countless times.
Google ‘Garland’.
Angel Gabriel says
Banned:
Robert Spencer
Pamela Geller
Michael Savage
Donald J Trump (pending)
Admitted:
Jihadists of any level of radicalization as long as they are “Imams or Clerics”
Mujahadeen
Muslim Brotherhood
ISIS Soldiers (with a valid passport only)
Anjem Choudary
David Scoltock says
Trump won’t be banned, he hasn’t incited racial hatred and no British governemnt will ban such a prominent politician without really good reason.
Spencer was banned because we wanted to meet with the British version of the KKK, which did his reputation with the British government no favours.
ainu888 says
What organization is that? Just curious.
David Scoltock says
EDL, English Defence League. A neo-nazi group made of the more extreme right-wingers who previously where part of the now defunct BNP and/or national front.
They have been linked to desecration of jewish cemetaries, racist attacks on the black, asian and chinese communities, gay bashing and links to European far right groups.
My family have a military history, serving in the Falklands and both world wars, i despise with a passion all forms of facism, whether it’s islamic or white neo-nazis.
nag says
And this cleric is coming to meet saints? How is the messenger not more important? This guy can actually radicalize young British Muslims. Spencer, if meeting a KKK-type group would not exactly be creating any hatred, maybe give them more reasons, but not creating.
David Scoltock says
If Spencer was serious about what he was doing he’d apply to something like the oxford union, not a bunch of neo-nazis.
The problem with Spencer is he likes to preach to choirs but shies away from real debate.
ainu888 says
Hi brother nag,
I detect some irritation in your response to David Scoltock. I think he should be allowed to express himself. He definitely raises interesting points and opinions that are in stark contrast to many on this forum, and that is always great in my book.
However, while it is admirable that Mr Scoltock comes out so strongly against what he terms as all forms of fascism, which is an admirable aim, he refuses directly address Islamic extremism.
His argument is rather standard, like “your religion/culture has problems too”, which probably shuts up people with no introspective power, but as an Indian capable of self-reflection, you readily admit to India’s problems, and consider all of Scoltock’s points as valid.
I will leave it to others to opine on the EDL issue as I am probably not so well acquainted with it, but I think Scoltock is slightly tone deaf, if he cannot distinguish between the coordinated wave of Islamic fascism sweeping the world and the barbaric stone age practices that crept into hinduism and are being extirpated by education and development.
nag says
@Ainu, Yes I am irritated, mostly because of this blindness. If you cannot live in a country the way you want to, you cannot live among the people of that country the way you want to. This guy actually thinks he owes us for what happened 70 years ago. Of course, they ruled India and everything, but I have never heard this argument from an Indian, that they owe us something. It’s always they who think they owe us. India has many problems. Democracy and secular law basically ends at the city limits. Caste system still exists in many parts (Including my family). Blind belief is everywhere and recently, an urge among young Hindus to prove Hinduism is scientific. Parts of Hinduism are true and scientific, but there are crazy parts as well. I am not Hating on fellow Indians, saying that Indians are worse than anyone else. We need to take responsibility though. I have heard this so many times that Caste system was actually good, until the Mughals and British ruined it. That somehow our worst cultural practices are not even ours to begin with. That we are better than others because we didn’t invade any country. Yes, India didn’t invade because we invading ourselves and fighting each other over languages.
And of course, anything bad in India, is worse in Pakistan.
Read about Rotherham to see how deep this problem is and how badly these guys try to justify acts of violence, just because we are brown.
VRWC member77 says
@nag and ainu888,
I wouldn’t put too much stock in the comments of sir scoltock. It’s interesting that he’ll grant you the grace be being part of his mighty “culture” by virtue of your so-called “Commonwealth” status. That sounds a bit condescending, don’t you think? Heck, it may even sound “racist.” Do you think he knows that Pakistan is listed as a Commonwealth Country?….at least according to this link:
http://www.execulink.com/~donslau/BC.html
He also appears to condemn the left and the right side of the political spectrum with his self appointed “expert” analysis of the kkk and Nazis….KKK being a creation of the democratic left in this country.
I’m no expert on India but I must say this: I’ve interacted with Indians with that had Hindu, Sikh, Jainism and Muslim cultural identities and the only ones with which I had hostile experiences were the ones with a Muslim background. Just thought I’d mention that. Cheers and peace to you both.
David Scoltock says
ainu888
I’m not tone deaf, however I am a 35 year old Englishman who’s father was in the RAF and I have spent my entire working life on British military bases. Starting with NAAFI. I am a patriot and I get sick and tired of Spencer’s sour grapes slagging off of my nation.
I’m somewhat well read and have a very good understanding of the current situation, including it’s origins in the West v Soviet geo-politics of the cold war.
Only an idiot could deny that islamic extremism is the biggest threat since the rise of nazism in the 30’s. However only a bigger idiot courts those very nazis in order to fight it.
The problem is we keep playing sides and we pick the wrong bloody ones. we support saudi while we consider iran to be villains when they are both as bad as each other. However iran are willing to fight isis while the saudis would rather support them.
We get involved in badly planned, knee jerk military operations and then do a half-job.
Iraq should of been occupied and rebuilt to the same standard (and the same cost) as the Marshal plan in post-war Germany. But the bloody mess was done on the cheap and you can see the inevitable results.
If you want to know how to deal with the middle east, read T.S Lawrence’s views on the subject.
We have spent centuries messing about with the middle east to best suit our political needs and now they have the resources and ability to return the favour. While we lack the will to deal with these situations properly.
You want to deal with isis? Go to the UN, declare them a sovereighn nation, then declare war. You then mobilise, properly mobilise and pay the price in blood and body bags that war requires. this bullshit with drones and airstrikes is pointless.
Ainu888 says
Mr. Scoltock,
Your father was in the RAF, and you spent your childhood as an RAF child, you say? Now, that is something I can definitely admire. Again, I will not address the Nazi ( EDL ) issue, because I am not knowledgeable about it.
About Western powers picking sides badly, I could not agree more. I still do not understand why Iraq was invaded, especially since the Baathists kept the nuts under control. However, despite our shared antipathy of those actions, they are the past now. We cannot change them. However, I doubt if the West meddled in the middle east before the drilling of oil, and the neanderthals that hail from that region should not use western meddling as an excuse for their barbarism, because the barbarism preceded western interest in that region. We in India have no right to blame our British former-colonial-masters for the perversion in our religion and society, because we did that to ourselves, and not the British. In fact, by the time the British discovered ourselves, we had been treating our marginal sections like dirt for generations.
The Islamo-fascists have no right to use history as an excuse, because the weight of history is a given that cannot be altered, and what defines you as a man/woman is how you react regardless of what has happened in the past.
Do not help the Islamo-fascists make excuses sir. It is not becoming of you.
Have a nice weekend,
A.
nag says
I Agree to this, except declaring ISIS a nation. I don’t think that helps. I also think you are wrong in comparing Modern Primarily anti-mass immigration groups to Nazis. Nazis have more in common with a lot of Muslims than those. Erdogan actually wants Turkey to be like NAZI Germany. I doubt any of those EDL groups actually want to kill all Muslims, or stop immigration completely. I think they want to restrict and control it better. I don’t know exactly though.
Rob says
For most of the past few ‘centuries’ the ME was under the sway of the Ottoman Turks.
Ask the Kurds and the Armenians how that worked out.
Western Canadian says
When Spencer gets wind of an organization being out of line, he comments on it, checks it out, and if true, drops them. And since nazis and muslims have a history of holding hands, it is rather amazing the way that ANYONE who opposes islam will be tarred as you have done here…. Just because someone is called nazi etc, doesn’t mean they are. To falsely accuse someone of being nazi or kkk is a very old and often used tactic of the hard left.
Rob says
It’s an old trick.
Al Jazeera has just criticised the republication of Mein Kampf because it will encourage the neo-Nazi Pergida.
VRWC member77 says
“Spencer was banned because we wanted to meet with the British version of the KKK, which did his reputation with the British government no favours.”
So you’re saying Spencer wanted meet with LEFT WING RACISTS?
duh_swami says
The KKK was founded by southern US democrats, after they lost the civil war to intimidate and kill Republicans, mostly, but not all black ones…They murdered over 3000 blacks and 1000 whites…In 1870 q branch of the KKK called ‘The Red Shirts’. massacred 300 blacks in Vicksburg Mississippi…There is no organization in UK that has that kind of record…
It’;s easier to say KKK than to duplicate it…
VRWC member77 says
Hey Dave,
The KKK was founded by the left in this country. When it comes to throwing around political word operatives, try and stick to your side of the pond.
gravenimage says
What utter rot:
“Spender and Geller Banned From Britain for Supporting Israel”
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/212329/spencer-and-geller-banned-britain-supporting-robert-spencer
خَليفة says
The fact that Saudis keep saying stupid things is proof that they are inbreed to the point of stupidity.
The royal families of Europe have been interbreeding for centuries
http://www.neatorama.com/2014/05/09/Inbreeding-A-Royal-Mess/
i’m sure the house of Saud has been doing the same. It is well know that Muslim communities have been inbreeding for 1400 years so they got a head start on Europeans. ( that’s why Muslim countries have much higher birth defect rates ) WHO esitmates that half of Muslims are inbred. So inbreeding is another thing Muslims have in common with UK monarchs. The notable difference is that non Royal europeans are not inbred, whereas any Muslim is very likely to be inbred. Europeans remember having some crazy kings in the past, the invading Muslims are all like the crazy kings of old, and they probably think they should be kings too ( take any women they want, take your money, property, life )
salim says
For the information of JW readers, this might be helpful to you in future debates about this subject. I don’t think even Robert Spencer (whose knowledge on Islam I admire) spotted this weakness.
Verse 4:34 in the Quran is clear and in plain Arabic and one of the few that do not require interpretation. This what it says: “But those [wives] from whom you fear disobedience – advise them, forsake them in bed and beat them. But if they obey you seek no means against them”. Please notice that the order to beat them is not for disobedience but for “fear of disobedience”. The Quran used the verb for orders: beat them, which is like the command: ‘open the door’ which must be carried out. It is not a suggestion or advice from Allah, it is a command.
This Egyptian cleric knows Arabic very well and understands his religion perfectly.
( I sent the above to the Daily Mail comments section but they didn’t post it)
abad says
Muslims males do NOT know how to treat women at all.
In fact they make most western male misogynists look tame in comparison.
Soliman clearly does not have a pair.
Hope says
England has signed its own death warrant and it’s their funeral. At least we are armed and ready and will fight to the last man and woman if/when it comes to that.
Rob says
Some examples of Mr Spencer being debated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YnaCi8m8P0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjZCKQOKvoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVq37mdHHnc
Stands up rather well.
These took less than 5 mins to locate.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim cleric from Egypt who said husbands should hit wives allowed to tour universities
…………………………
Yeah–and he is for Muslims using “filthy Infidels” as sex slaves, as well..
But remember–it is the civilized Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller–who dare warn against pious Muslims like this cleric who are banned from Britain.
Suicidal madness.