The Belgian Secretary of State for Asylum, Migration and Administrative Simplification, Theo Francken, said: “I find it totally unacceptable that some young Afghans find it necessary to tell Syrian girls to wear a headscarf and that they should not dress like western girls. They come here, they are guests here. We are not theirs. They have to adapt to our rules.”
You’re saying that now, Francken? Are you aware that the migrants have no intention whatsoever of adapting to your rules? No, of course you don’t, and neither do your colleagues. And therein lies the problem.
“100 Riot In Migrant Reception Centre, Triggered By Woman’s Refusal To Wear A Head Scarf,” by Sarkis Zeronian, Breitbart, February 20, 2016:
11 people were arrested yesterday following a riot involving Syrians, Afghans and Iraqis which broke out over a dispute involving a Syrian woman refusing to wear a head scarf.
Those arrested following the riot at a migrant reception centre in Moorslede quarter of Leopoldsburg, Belgium, have now been removed, reportsHet Laatste Nieuws. Red Cross spokeswoman, An Luyten, confirmed: “The four that were part of the core portion have been transferred to a detention centre. The seven others are individually housed and distributed in other reception centres in Flanders.”
The trigger for the riot, which saw the migrants using chairs, broomsticks and rubbish bins on each other, was a dispute over a Syrian woman’s refusal to wear a headscarf, reportsFlanders News.
“Two or three Afghans had been targeting a young girl from Syria for a couple of days because she was not covering her head,” explained Ms. Luyten, “which is weird, because several other girls were also not wearing a headscarf. It is not clear why they were after this girl in particular.”…
“We are shocked by this massive brawl,” added Ms. Luyten, “it is also traumatic for the other asylum seekers, women and children. We honestly did not see this fight coming, although the arguments had apparently been going on for a few days.”…
There is a whole lot more you don’t see coming as well.
Secretary of State for Asylum, Migration and Administrative Simplification, Theo Francken, has spoken out about the riot, saying:
“I find it totally unacceptable that some young Afghans find it necessary to tell Syrian girls to wear a headscarf and that they should not dress like western girls.
“They come here, they are guests here. We are not theirs. They have to adapt to our rules.”

mccode says
When all women are walking around in medieval head-to-toe shrouds, then will those idiots be pleased? Of course not. Another fraudulent grievance will erupt that must be accommodated, then another, ad infinitum.
Georg says
You’ve made the fundamental misunderstanding that they seek happiness.
Shane says
They were surprised that the Muslims were fighting their own kind, instead of robbing, raping, and assaulting infidels as they usually do.
OllieJJ says
Contrary to what Ms.Luyten said other sources have reported that it was clear why they were after this girl in particular: she had refused to positively respond to the sexual advances of the guy. Once she had delined them the guy, typically shamed into muslim embarassment, begun shaming and submitting the girl into wearing a scarf, teaming up with other men in order to scold her. People in Belgium were acurately being reported, and the awareness and tension are rising.
gravenimage says
Quite likely, Ollie.
Karen says
But I thought wearing a hijab was a beautiful, totally voluntary of expression of faith, and a woman’s declaration of modesty and her right to privacy. (Have I ‘covered’ all the buzz words?) How totally weird that some Muslim male thugs were threatening her for not wearing one.
But not really, since some of us know the true story of the Hijab and how ‘voluntary’ it is.
Rob says
‘Adapt to our rules’
This is a phrase that will echo through the West for decades to come. But, of course growing fainter and fainter with every passing year.
It’s equivalent in its monstrosity as ‘Arbeit macht Frei’.
gravenimage says
Rob, how is expecting barbaric Muslims to adapt to the civilized West the equivalent of the Nazi death camps? Am I reading your point correctly?
jayell says
Are these ‘people’ aware that they are making total disgusting prats of themselves in the eyes of the good citizens of Europe? Or aren’t they bothered? If not, why not?
Anne Smith says
Of course they are not bothered. The “good citizens” are nothing more than stupid infidels to them and to be treated as weak fools from whom they can extract everything they need and this will even more reinforce their contempt for European values and morals.
Westman says
In the Muslim World, women are property and are expected to do what their superiors(men) demand. It is a shock for these migrant misogynists to suddenly discover they are no longer “superior” under civil law.
This is too much power for these men to give up. Instead they will segregate and create their own geographic regions within the host country where they are in control of women and will agitate for Sharia law; practicing it with or without state consent.
Theo Francken should realize this little riot is only a taste of things to come. The big title, “Secretary of State for Asylum, Migration and Administrative Simplification” doesn’t contain even a hint of “integration”. That will help save face later when the citizens start recognizing neighborhoods too unsafe to enter; adorned at the perimeter with yellow signs.
Vlad says
“They come here, they are guests here. We are not theirs. They have to adapt to our rules.”
According to a Scandinavian proverb: “Guests are like fish; after 3 days they both start to smell”.
Well the “guests” in Europe are stinking to to high heaven, it’s time to put them into the garbage disposal unit and get rif of them for good.
nicu says
A guy from Peru who lives and works a long time in Germany said : ” Merkel puts Piranhas into a tank with goldfish ” – so well said !
Kick them out off our continent , finally !
Togaparty says
It is sickening to see these cowelled spectres from antiquity prowling our streets, passing themselves off as rational citizens while our people grovel to their Common Purpose enablers.
Resist says
They are not naive, they know damn well that these retards are not men enough to consider women free. Let it be that one day politicians who made this invasion possible have their own daughters or wifes or mothers experience the muslim way…As for Merkel I won t say what I wish but she is really responsible for turning Europe into islamist playground
carpediadem says
Well I’ve been harassed by a conservative Christian middle aged “man” who thinks being insulted by females is worse than being insulted by males. His “masculine man” identity you know. My contempt for him equals that for any woman-hating Muslim throwing a tantrum over burkas.
Pathetic, but since he’s louder and stronger than me, he shouts over me when I speak in a discussion.
Not just Muslims, and he’s not the only one.
That said, EU organised this deadly fiasco years ago, in the early 1970s via Penis Envy Charles de Gaulle, though France had Islamic Empire dreams for decades before that.
Interesting that both the NewWorld order/Agenda 21 and the EuroArab Dialogue operated on a similar timetable.
Carolyne says
If you, carpediadem have been harassed by anyone, we have laws against that, unlike Islamic countries and now, Europe. So you need to report it, if it is true, and have this man prosecuted. Assault isn’t just if someone physically harms you, it is if they make you fear they will. I don’t think shouting over you is a violation of the law, though, its just part of everyday living. Both men and women do it. Perhaps he feels that you are attempting to shout over him. In any case, there are remedies at law for true harassment, so it might be more reasonable for you to use them. Get back to us if he actually commits a crime other than irritating you. That isn’t against the law.
Western Canadian says
Assuming this isn’t fiction, his behaviour is neither conservative, nor Christian.
Jenny H says
Resist,
I wouldn’t wish harm on the loved ones of politicians, but maybe if they personally experienced some of the consequences of the moslem invasion, it might change things. Oh, if only greater visionaries and more competent leaders would come forward! It seems the fight against Islam will have to start at the grassroots, as it won’t come from the current leaders.
Voytek Gagalka says
“Belgium, we have the problem!” (Paraphrasing famous statement of Jim Lovell to the Houston’s command center.)
Ciudadano says
Well, obviously Theo Francken should be fired cause his comments show lack sensitivity towards the culture of immigrants and his comments reflect a westernized mind set, almost christian. Deep down he must be a secret Islamophobic. The girl should be sent back to Syria for her disrespect of Afghan long standing traditions and because she offended Islam.
CogitoErgoSum says
Guests? Mr. Francken, I don’t think most of these migrants see themselves as guests. In their minds they are simply moving to lands that should rightfully be theirs in the first place. Remember, they think of themselves as the best of people and everybody else is despised by Allah … so it’s out with the bad and in with the good.
“Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in Allah. And if the People of the Scripture had believed it had been better for them. Some of them are believers; but most of them are evil-livers.” Quran 3:110 (Pickthall)
And, yes, I’m one of those “evil-livers.” I think that term would included those who are not “People of the Book” as well.
Angemon says
Afghans? Did they came in with the “Syrian” “refugees”?
What did you expect? They bring Afghanistan with them.
How’s that been working out so far? And what are you going to do about it?
gravenimage says
As you know,Angemon, there are lots of Muslims flooding into Europe along with the Syrian “refugees”.
Angemon says
Indeed, hence why I write about “Syrian” “refugees” – the majority of them is neither Syrian nor a refugee, despite what we were told. And it’s erroneous to refer to them as “migrants”. Let’s just call them what they are: entering a country illegally is a crime, therefore they’re criminals.
Mirren10 says
” They come here, they are guests here. We are not theirs. They have to adapt to our rules.”
Francken, did no-one ever quote that aphorism to you, the one about locking the stable door after the horse has bolted ?
So, stop the empty mealy mouthed posturing; put your money where your mouth is.
Custos Custodum says
Let’s quit beating about the bush.
To Muslims, the hijab expresses Muslim ownership of women. This is why sex-starved Afghan illiterates find it natural to riot over the sartorial preferences of a Syrian woman.
Muslims – male and female – are raised from childhood to believe that Muslim women belong to Muslim men, and non-Muslim women ALSO belong to Muslim men as prey “that their right hands possess”.
This is the REAL basic tenet that – much more than the oft-rehearsed “five pillars of Islam” has driven sex-crazed Muslim men to <martyrdom and demographic conquest over 1400 years.
mortimer says
Custos Custodum wrote: ” the hijab expresses Muslim ownership of women”
That is precise. The alpha male in the woman’s clan or her husband OWNS the woman as his absolute property. She may not divorce him or leave home without his permission. She is a slave.
The main reason for the hijab is to prevent a woman from being recognized and coveted by someone outside first cousins. Stealing and abducting women is normative Islam. A covered woman may not be abducted or raped.
The hijab was given divine sanction by Mohammed who suddenly received a revelation on the advice of Omar, but the hijab is not primarily religious, but sociological.
Carolyne says
Yes, you are correct, Custos Custodum and Mortimer. Muslims have no concept that women are free to do as they wish and they are taught that from birth. There is no way to erase it and they need to live not in Wurope or the US, but In the middle east where they thrive and can kill each other as their ridiculous Allah wills.
Georg says
“Are you aware that the migrants have no intention whatsoever of adapting to your rules?”
In fairness, there is a media blackout on the subject, so how could he be? It looks like there is a European Jeh Johnson. What a sick farce, and all to roll out the carpet for a group bent on his and our submission.
mortimer says
It’s time for Theo Francken to take a crash study course in Sharia law. Without a knowledge of Sharia, how can he govern a country with a large Muslim population?
Western politicians and elites who do not study Islam’s foundational source texts are CULPABLY NEGLIGENT.
Carolyne says
I think its the Saudi money.
Dan Jones says
Such a sick and despicable the followers of the pedophile mo-ham-is-mad are…
More End Time News At:
http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=4526
Hope says
“We are shocked by this massive brawl.”
REALLY?
What the hell planet have these people been living on?
RonW says
As I understand it, the hijab, burkha, etc etc, not only express the subjugation of women, they’re an in-your-face de-facto flag – “We’re muslims. We’re here. We rule. Suck on it!”
mortimer says
To Theo Francken, I say: WELCOME TO THE CRAZY ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF SHARIA LAW.
As Robert Spencer commented: it doesn’t matter what THEO FRANCKEN thinks or the Belgian cabinet thinks or what the Belgian constitution says. Muslims want to impose Sharia on Belgium.
Belgium has bit off more than it can chew and must immediately begin to send Muslims back to Berzerkistan.
mortimer says
Franzen said: ““They come here, they are guests here. We are not theirs. They have to adapt to our rules.”
Wrong. They do not see themselves as ‘guests’, but conquerors.
Time to tell the ‘guests’ to get out.
Singh the Sikh says
You are both a dork and a dimwit of the highest order Theo. The evidence was staring at your face, daily, for may years. You and you government took the ostrich approach. Worse, you the gates to let in the hordes.
They are not in Belgium to be guests, Theo. They are there to impose, overpower, subjugate and take over. They are not even hiding their intentions. Yet you chose to ignore. The price of ignorance is going to be very high. You ain’t seen nothing yet Theo. They will force you to adopt their ways. They will use guns, bombs and every other weapon at their disposal to make you bend to their will. It is th away of the Islam. Go, read the literature.
This is just the beginning. Unless you an your government start doing what needs to be done to kick the barbarians out and keep them there.
Keys says
That’s right, Singh. They are literally “damned fools” if they don’t get them out and keep them out.
As you say, they will “impose, overpower, subjugate and take over”, and I would add that the Europeans will literally “pay the price” for them to do it. Damned fools!
gravenimage says
Here’s at least a slight modicum of decency and sanity from Belgian Immigration Minister Theo Francken:
“Rapists won’t be given asylum. They will be sent back to Iraq if they are found guilty.”
Story here:
“Radicalized” Muslim migrants gang-rape unconscious teen: “She has nothing to complain about. Women must obey men.”
http://pamelageller.com/2016/02/radicalized-muslim-migrants-gang-rape-unconscious-teen-she-has-nothing-to-complain-about-women-must-obey-men.html/
This may not sound like much, but at least he is drawing the line *somewhere*–which is more than many European authorities are doing.
branepilot says
Refugees must adapt to your culture and rules? That is colonialism, apartheid, racism and xenophobia. Go read up on multiculturalism.
LR says
It’s quite simple. When guests misbehave badly, it’s time for them to be made to leave.
Jay Boo says
Muslim woman wishing to dump Islam — WELCOME
Muslim men are terrified that Muslim women would marry a non-Muslim and dump Islam.
Note: — You will never here Razali admit that.
No wonder Islam does not allow a woman to divorce their husband (slave masters)
LR says
Well actually, Muslin women can divorce. Depends on which country I guess.
Bob says
No, on the contrary, they do not see themselves as guests, but rather as the conquerors! They’ see themselves as the leaders of the intended Islamic take-over of Europe -the caliphate, to be welcomed by we ‘infidels’ – or else!!!
Falsafa says
“there is no compulsion in religion” the refugees insisting on headscarves are wrong and their attitude reflect the harsh conditions their societies in afganistan, iraq live under, also is a reflection of their own social levels, lack of proper education..again nothing to do with Islam!
Angemon says
Falsafa posted:
““there is no compulsion in religion””
But revoking your shahada gets you the death penalty.
“the refugees insisting on headscarves are wrong and their attitude reflect the harsh conditions their societies in afganistan, iraq live under,”
All islamic nations. Plus, Syria seems to be in a worse state than Afghanistan or Iraq, and yet, that woman did not wear a headscarf.
“also is a reflection of their own social levels, lack of proper education..again nothing to do with Islam!”
Except that educated, medium-to-high-class muslims, even in the West, have their women wear headscarves because of their religion.
Falsafa says
total distortion of Islam by angemony….nobody can force anybody in this case “their women” as you refer to them, to do anything, wear anything…headscarves included. You must have been watching too many Isis propaganda videos to get your kicks I would imagine. Those that force their beliefs onto others including their family members are the poorer, uneducated parts of these countries, afganistan…etc….driven more by tribal traditions more than anything….enforced by centuries of colonization, occupation…see the “great game” of the 19th century played out by Russian and western empires over the region. Iraq and Syria have joined the fray starting with the iraq war from 2003 onwards. Look towards Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Jordan for leadership of the muslim world on how Islam and modernity have fused in such a constructive, forward looking manner. You can be anti Islam, anti muslim – your views and those of your fellow anti Islam bloggists are respected but allow us to state the truth and stop the spin that the anti Islam community so skillfully puts out there through blogs such as these…
Angemon says
Falsafa posted:
“total distortion of Islam by angemony”
No, “total distortion” of islam by muslims with Angemon talking about what they say. Do you deny that the penalty for a sane, male muslim that leaves islam is death?
“nobody can force anybody in this case “their women” as you refer to them, to do anything, wear anything…headscarves included.”
I don’t know what you’ve been smoking, but actually people *can* actually force others to do things they don’t want to. Or do you want to argue that all people forced into slavery throughout history were in fact willing participants?
Muslims *can*, and *have*, forced women to use headscarves. Which is exactly what happened in this case – muslims trying to force a woman to wear the headscarf.
“You must have been watching too many Isis propaganda videos”
Nope. I knew that muslims force their women to wear headscarves (or the burqa) long before ISIS came into scene. Funny how you mention ISIS – they’re muslims and they force women to wear headscarves. Thank you for doing my work for me – you suck at debating.
“to get your kicks I would imagine.”
Huh, I’m not a muslim – muslims, like you, like jihad beheading porn.
“Those that force their beliefs onto others”
You mean people can actually force others? Didn’t you said that “nobody can force anybody”? Boy, you suck at debating…
“including their family members are the poorer, uneducated parts of these countries, afganistan…etc….driven more by tribal traditions more than anything”
Except that muslims in the West, who are not poor or uneducated, have forced women in their families to wear headscarves. In fact, muslimas died for refusing to do so.
“enforced by centuries of colonization, occupation”
Yes, centuries of muslims occupying Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, etc., lands and forcing women to wear headscarves.
“Look towards Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Jordan for leadership of the muslim world on how Islam and modernity have fused in such a constructive, forward looking manner.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M
“You can be anti Islam, anti muslim – your views and those of your fellow anti Islam bloggists are respected”
Not by you they’re not – any criticism of islam gets you spinning so fast we could dry wet clothing in you.
“but allow us to state the truth”
You can start whenever you want…
“and stop the spin that the anti Islam community so skillfully puts out there through blogs such as these…”
Huh, was this blog that got the “refugees” all worked out because a woman refused to wear the headscarf?
Heather says
Islam is a fake ‘religion’. Read the Koran, you’ll agree.
Heather says
I am NOT shocked or surprised by muslims bad behaviour. I would be surprised if they behaved in a civilised manner. Vile creatures.