Bishop McElroy assures us: “‘I want to underscore that it is not bigotry to fear or to combat the violence and terror which some Muslims in the world have unleashed in the name of faith,’ he explained, while acknowledging that some Christians also have attempted to use their faith to justify acts of violence.” Which Christians? He didn’t say, or at least it isn’t in this report. Have those violent Christians committed violence at any rate commensurate with the 27,000 murderous jihad attacks worldwide since 9/11? He doesn’t seem to have considered that question.
Anyway, so McElroy says it’s not bigotry to combat Islamic violence and terror. So what exactly does constitute anti-Islamic bigotry? McElroy said that “U.S. Catholics should view with repugnance the ‘repeated falsehoods’ that Islam is inherently violent, that Muslims seek to supplant the U.S. Constitution with sharia law, and that Muslim immigration threatens ‘the cultural identity of the American people.’ Such claims, he said, are strikingly reminiscent of the anti-Catholic bigotry that was once prevalent in the United States.”
So apparently if you think that Islam is inherently violent, you’re not only wrong, but you’re a bigot. In order to avoid bigotry, you have to ignore or deny the readily demonstrable fact that the Qur’an exhorts believers to violence, and that all mainstream Islamic sects and schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach that the Muslim community has a responsibility to wage war against and subjugate unbelievers.
You’re also a bigot, in McElroy’s view, of you believe that “Muslims seek to supplant the U.S. Constitution with sharia law.” If you believe that only some Muslims seek to do that, are you only a partial bigot? McElroy didn’t say. Interestingly enough, however, he was speaking here along with Sayyid M. Syeed, national director of the Islamic Society of North America’s Office for Interfaith and Community Alliances. ISNA has admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Federal prosecutors in 2008 rejected claims that ISNA was unfairly named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding case.
The Muslim Brotherhood is dedicated in its own words, according to a captured internal document, to “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” That’s from “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America,” by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991. ISNA is named as an allied group of the Brotherhood in that document.
So while decrying as bigotry the idea that Muslims are seeking to supplant the Constitution with Sharia, McElroy was speaking alongside a representative of an organization linked to efforts to do exactly that.
Ah, the wonderful ironies of “interfaith dialogue.”
McElroy also says you’re a bigot if you think that “Muslim immigration threatens ‘the cultural identity of the American people.'” He did not explain how the introduction into the country of massive numbers of people with no cultural or theological traditions of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and equality of rights for women could not end up threatening the cultural identity of the American people. He didn’t have to explain: as far as he is concerned, these propositions are dogmas to be taken on faith, not assertions to be evaluated on the basis of evidence.
And finally, McElroy said that such claims are “strikingly reminiscent of the anti-Catholic bigotry that was once prevalent in the United States.” In fact, no. No Catholics were committing acts of terrorism and justifying them by pointing to Catholic texts and teachings. There was no global Catholic terrorist movement boasting about how it would by and by destroy the United States.
The Bishop’s claims, so complacently made in the presence of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim spokesman who must have found it hard to keep a straight face as his Catholic counterpart blathered his inanities, are in reality an insult to any even marginally thoughtful person. But woe betide you in today’s Catholic Church if you don’t blindly hold to them. The ancient dogmas of the faith — no one cares about those. But dissent from the idea that Islam is a religion of peace and that to examine Islam’s texts and teachings is “bigotry,” and you have no place in today’s Church.
“Bishop challenges Catholics to combat ‘ugly tide of anti-Islamic bigotry,'” by Denis Grasska, Catholic News Service, February 22, 2016 (thanks to Tom):
SAN DIEGO (CNS) — San Diego Bishop Robert W. McElroy is challenging U.S. Catholics to take an active role in combating “the scourge of anti-Islamic prejudice.”
“We are witnessing in the United States a new nativism, which the American Catholic community must reject and label for the religious bigotry which it is,” he said in a keynote address delivered Feb. 17 in the University of San Diego’s Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice.
The evening event took place against the backdrop of the first national Catholic-Muslim dialogue, which was held Feb. 17-18 at the Catholic university.
Last May, after more than 20 years of regional dialogues with representatives of the U.S. Muslim community, the Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops established a national Catholic-Muslim dialogue.
Motivated by the call of “Nostra Aetate,” the Second Vatican Council’s declaration on the relationship between the Catholic Church and non-Catholic faiths, the dialogue seeks to foster understanding and collaboration between Catholics and Muslims. Chicago Archbishop Blase J. Cupich has been named its first Catholic co-chairman.
In addition to Bishop McElroy’s speech, the evening also featured a keynote speech by Sayyid M. Syeed, national director of the Islamic Society of North America’s Office for Interfaith and Community Alliances, who reflected on the state of Catholic-Muslim relations from the Muslim perspective.
A discussion with both men was conducted on stage by Ami Carpenter, an associate professor at the Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, with members of the audience invited to ask questions.
In his remarks, Bishop McElroy exhorted Catholics “to recognize and confront the ugly tide of anti-Islamic bigotry” in the United States, to actively seek relationships with Muslims on a personal level, to accompany the Muslim community as it wrestles with religious liberty issues, and to join with them “to witness to and fight for” a Middle East where Christian, Muslim and Jewish communities can coexist peacefully.
Bishop McElroy said U.S. Catholics should view with repugnance the “repeated falsehoods” that Islam is inherently violent, that Muslims seek to supplant the U.S. Constitution with sharia law, and that Muslim immigration threatens “the cultural identity of the American people.” Such claims, he said, are strikingly reminiscent of the anti-Catholic bigotry that was once prevalent in the United States.
However, the bishop’s denunciation of prejudice does not signify a denial of the reality of terrorism.
“I want to underscore that it is not bigotry to fear or to combat the violence and terror which some Muslims in the world have unleashed in the name of faith,” he explained, while acknowledging that some Christians also have attempted to use their faith to justify acts of violence.
Bishop McElroy also challenged U.S. Catholics to overcome the “patterns of social segregation” that lead them to associate almost exclusively with people from similar backgrounds. Because of this trend, he said, many Americans do not have a significant friendship with a single member of the Muslim faith.
“Religious bigotry thrives in an environment of social isolation,” he said. “Encounter, which leads to friendship and, thus, deeper understanding, is the most important antidote to prejudice and bigotry.”
Through such encounters, he said, Catholics may take inspiration from the rich spirituality of the Muslim people, which includes the centrality of daily prayer, a commitment to asceticism and an understanding of “the immensity and the richness” of divine mercy.
Bishop McElroy reflected on the development of Catholic doctrine on the subject of religious freedom and noted that it was once suggested that, “in a (John F.) Kennedy presidency, it would be the pope who would ultimately govern the United States.” He said Catholics must speak out against “distortions of Muslim theology and teaching on society and the state, because these distortions are just as devastating in the present day as the distortions of Catholic teaching … which were disseminated in American society in the 19th century.”
He encouraged Catholics “to walk with the Muslim community” as it reflects upon issues of religious liberty and the relationship between church and state.
Before concluding his presentation, Bishop McElroy issued one last challenge: Catholics and Muslims should work together toward a peaceful future and an end to religious conflict. Praising Islam’s respect for “the peoples of the Book” — its term for adherents of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, each of which trace their lineage back to the patriarch Abraham — the bishop acknowledged the fear and grief that has been caused by religious violence worldwide.
He called it “a terrible wound to the Christian community” that Christians in the Middle East are facing “extinction” in a region that has been there home for more than a millennium, while it is “a great tragedy for the Muslim community” to see Muslim refugees denied safe haven in Europe.
“This final challenge to the Catholic community in the United States,” Bishop McElroy said, “is in reality a challenge to both the Catholic and Muslim communities to walk in solidarity, witnessing, strategizing and advancing public policy within the U.S. and within the Muslim world to forge a secure future for all of the ‘peoples of the Book’ in the Middle East and throughout the world.”
In his own keynote presentation, Syeed noted that the first millennium was marked by positive relations between Christianity and Islam, but that changed in the millennium that followed, which included the Crusades.
“The long stretch of endless confrontation between the two faiths divided the world into a ‘house of Islam’ and a ‘house of Christianity,'” he said. “Such a division … helped to establish mutually destructive attitudes and stereotypes that shaped our respective cultures and formed our individual consciences for centuries.”
But “a new era of understanding and recognition” dawned during the latter half of the 20th century, he said. “Nostra Aetate” was instrumental in bringing an end to “the millennium of confrontation between Islam and Christianity.” This improved relationship, he said, also has coincided with the emergence of a “vibrant Muslim community” in the West.
Unfortunately, said Syeed, the Islamic State terrorist group has reintroduced “the terminology of (the) Crusades era.” It identifies Christians as “crusaders” rather “people of the Book.” The “antidote” to the Islamic State philosophy, he said, comes through robust Catholic-Muslim dialogue as well as the lived experience of Muslims in the West.
He specifically cited his own organization, the Islamic Society of North America, whose members have lived peacefully among American Christians for more than 50 years. Living in a pluralistic society has encouraged American Muslims to re-examine the original sources of Islam and to reconsider some conventions that were adopted centuries later….