Malala Yousafzai thinks a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration is “full of hatred.” She does not, however, appear to believe that the genocidal hatred and murderous bloodlust of the “Palestinians” in Gaza is “full of hatred,” since she gave $50,000 to UN schools in Gaza — schools which are hotbeds of jihad activity. Hamas rocket arsenals were found three times in UN schools in Gaza during the fighting in summer 2014. Hamas and Islamic Jihad now fully control the UNRWA in the Gaza Strip.
Nor does Malala address the problem that Trump’s proposal is trying to address: how to keep jihad terrorists out of the country. San Bernardino jihad murderer Tashfeen Malik passed five separate background checks by five different government agencies to be admitted into the U.S. “Refugees” were among the jihad murderers in Paris last November. How does Malala, or anyone who finds Trump’s proposal “hateful,” propose to deal with the possibility of jihadis entering the U.S. as refugees? No one has ever offered a counter-proposal.
Meanwhile, Malala warned UK politicians: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.” What UK politicians are speaking out against all Muslims? Why, none of them are. It is a common claim of Islamic supremacist groups with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), that to speak about how jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism is to claim that all Muslims are terrorists, but there is no truth to that; the charge is designed to intimidate people into thinking it wrong and bigoted to examine the jihad doctrine and ideology.
Malala also says more than she thinks she says. If Islam teaches peace, why will people criticizing it turn peaceful Muslims into violent terrorists? If people criticize Christianity, Christians don’t become terrorists. Malala reveals here that she knows that Islam has texts that teach hatred, violence and supremacism, and is essentially saying that Muslims are willing to ignore those texts unless non-Muslims get too far out of line, at which point they will embrace them.
And finally, why is Marie Claire cheerleading for Malala’s remarks? I don’t read Marie Claire myself, but isn’t it some kind of fashion magazine or something like that? The entire Leftist establishment is so threatened by Trump, and so sold out to the Islamic agenda, that even a magazine all about shoes and bags and skirts gives itself over to this ill-thought-out propaganda?
“Malala Yousafzai Delivers the Elegant Donald Trump Rebuttal You’ve Been Waiting For,” by Mattie Kahn, Marie Claire, February 25, 2016 (thanks to Darcy):
…In an interview with United Kingdom’s Channel 4, Yousafzai warned hateful politicians about the danger of their anti-Muslim messages: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” she said. A good point—and a terrifying one, too.
She also commented this week more specifically about Donald Trump and his proposal that all Muslims be banned from entering the United States, calling it “full of hatred.”…”That’s really tragic that you hear these comments which are full of hatred, full of this ideology of being discriminative toward others.”
Our sentiments exactly.