• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Malala Yousafzai: Trump’s Muslim immigration ban “full of hatred”

Feb 25, 2016 10:37 am By Robert Spencer

Malala Yousafzai thinks a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration is “full of hatred.” She does not, however, appear to believe that the genocidal hatred and murderous bloodlust of the “Palestinians” in Gaza is “full of hatred,” since she gave $50,000 to UN schools in Gaza — schools which are hotbeds of jihad activity. Hamas rocket arsenals were found three times in UN schools in Gaza during the fighting in summer 2014. Hamas and Islamic Jihad now fully control the UNRWA in the Gaza Strip.

Nor does Malala address the problem that Trump’s proposal is trying to address: how to keep jihad terrorists out of the country. San Bernardino jihad murderer Tashfeen Malik passed five separate background checks by five different government agencies to be admitted into the U.S. “Refugees” were among the jihad murderers in Paris last November. How does Malala, or anyone who finds Trump’s proposal “hateful,” propose to deal with the possibility of jihadis entering the U.S. as refugees? No one has ever offered a counter-proposal.

Meanwhile, Malala warned UK politicians: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.” What UK politicians are speaking out against all Muslims? Why, none of them are. It is a common claim of Islamic supremacist groups with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), that to speak about how jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism is to claim that all Muslims are terrorists, but there is no truth to that; the charge is designed to intimidate people into thinking it wrong and bigoted to examine the jihad doctrine and ideology.

Malala also says more than she thinks she says. If Islam teaches peace, why will people criticizing it turn peaceful Muslims into violent terrorists? If people criticize Christianity, Christians don’t become terrorists. Malala reveals here that she knows that Islam has texts that teach hatred, violence and supremacism, and is essentially saying that Muslims are willing to ignore those texts unless non-Muslims get too far out of line, at which point they will embrace them.

And finally, why is Marie Claire cheerleading for Malala’s remarks? I don’t read Marie Claire myself, but isn’t it some kind of fashion magazine or something like that? The entire Leftist establishment is so threatened by Trump, and so sold out to the Islamic agenda, that even a magazine all about shoes and bags and skirts gives itself over to this ill-thought-out propaganda?

Malala

“Malala Yousafzai Delivers the Elegant Donald Trump Rebuttal You’ve Been Waiting For,” by Mattie Kahn, Marie Claire, February 25, 2016 (thanks to Darcy):

…In an interview with United Kingdom’s Channel 4, Yousafzai warned hateful politicians about the danger of their anti-Muslim messages: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” she said. A good point—and a terrifying one, too.

She also commented this week more specifically about Donald Trump and his proposal that all Muslims be banned from entering the United States, calling it “full of hatred.”

…”That’s really tragic that you hear these comments which are full of hatred, full of this ideology of being discriminative toward others.”

Our sentiments exactly.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, immigration, journalistic bias Tagged With: Donald Trump, Malala Yousafzai, Marie Claire


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. 4406Pack says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 10:40 am

    Aren’t her 15 minutes up yet?

    • Mark Swan says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 12:25 am

      She is Just a mixed-up Kid…With no real chance at free choice…Her handlers have Her convinced
      that this is the way to respect Her People’s beliefs…the sad part is it was Islamic fanatics that tried
      to kill Her because she wanted to read and write…She seems to think this is about something it is
      not about…exploiting this damaged Kid like this is creepy.

      • BC says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 4:13 am

        Mixed up? Mixed up is a definition of a lot of Muslims. Well she is a brave girl but teenagers are brave and foolhardy and inclined to risky behaviour as well we know. She does not seem to get it that she is viewed as an icon in the West because she was almost murdered for standing up for the values the Western civilisation holds dear, yet she remains a Muslim. She could set an example to millions of Muslim girls by leaving Islam. She is very unlikely to do that.
        I believe there is a movie on release about her now!.

        • Diana says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 8:37 am

          The movie is a documentary about Malala’s life. I believe she agreed to it in good faith and it portrays her well. She may or may not have approved the full script before it was released. It takes the line that only “fanatics” oppose female education and other human rights; there is nothing un-Islamic about being a strong, intelligent woman.

          As evidence for this controversial claim, the voice-over remarked: “The whole of sura 4 of the Quran is devoted to the subject of women’s rights.” Yes, really! Naturally, no examples from the chapter were given. The script-writer seemed to be banking on the assumption that the average cinema-goer would not know what is in sura 4 of the Quran.

          My husband didn’t know. He has read the Quran, but he thought I was unrealistic to “expect” him to remember chapter and verse like that. So what is the chance that the average movie-goer will bother to check the reference?

          I was left wondering who was the deceiver in this set-up. Has Malala read the Quran or hasn’t she? Either way, what is her motive – conscious or unconscious – for speaking for Islam?

        • Alan says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 8:14 pm

          It’s one thing to speak of free choice, free speech and education in the west, and another thing to leave Islam.
          Now that Malala received freedom and convenient life, apparently she ain’t brave enough to take the risk of being assaulted again.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 27, 2016 at 1:26 am

          “The whole of sura 4 of the Quran is devoted to the subject of women’s rights.”
          …………………

          Yes–like the “right” to be beaten if her husband so much as “fears” disobedience.

    • nicu says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 2:10 pm

      She fooled us : Al taqqiya !

      If I would be American I would vote for Trump – though I don’t like him as a person . He says what / who causes the most trouble everywhere .

      • Sandra Lee Smith says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 3:44 pm

        Trouble with Trump is that what he says and what he DOES don’t always match up well; if at all!

        • Mo says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 pm

          @ Sandra Lee Smith

          “Trouble with Trump is that what he says and what he DOES don’t always match up well; if at all!”

          Yes, that is my problem with him as well.

    • Simone Fields says

      Feb 28, 2016 at 7:25 am

      They are all indoctrinated up to the hilt. If almost being killed for going to school doesn’t make you want to instantly give up Islam what on earth could! Her life is being threatened all the time by nutty Muslims in England. They all use an identical vocabulary when you see them on t.v. In debates, it’s always about us misunderstanding the religion and that its all the fault of the media – how condescending is that! Like we can’t use our own brains to find out ourselves. They insult our Intelligence.
      ” the more you speak about Islam you will create more terrorists” she says. Thats Mafiosa speak- intimidation is their expertise.

      • Diana says

        Feb 28, 2016 at 6:47 pm

        Actually I think it’s quite natural that Malala should assume that her parents have “real” Islam and that the murderous anti-education mob have somehow distorted the message.

        She loves her parents, who have created a functional family, who are pious in their praying and fasting and who persisted in sending her to school. Her father made public speeches in favour of female education and other moderate Islam topics. Islam does not directly say that women should not be educated (as opposed to setting up a social system in which women have little access to education and less opportunity to use it); the terrorists have gone beyond their brief in demanding female illiteracy. Of course Malala has adopted her parents’ values.

        And she did show real courage in continuing to attend school despite the terrorist threats. It’s quite likely that she was not shot at random because she was on the school bus but was in fact deliberately targeted because of her father’s political activities.

        Malala’s mistake is her continual babbling about Islam. She neither supports terrorism nor explains coherently why she has “gone liberal” and rejected certain parts of the Quran. She just doesn’t seem to understand why her position is illogical. This is excusable for a 14-year-old who is just trying to finish high school, but an 18-year-old should be thinking more clearly. She is certainly old enough to be challenged about the intrinsic dishonesty of such claims as:

        * Peaceful people might become terrorists if they are criticised. (Everyone and everything is criticised non-stop in the West. How many non-Muslim terrorists does the West produce?)
        * People who worry about terrorism are hateful. (Wasn’t Malala herself sufficiently worried about terrorists to run away from Pakistan?)
        * Quran chapter 4 is about women’s rights. (Perhaps especially verses 3, 11-12 and 34?)

        The media has certainly not done Malala any favours by treating her as an authority when her ideas are still at such an early stage of development. While she didn’t ask to become a public figure, being thrust into the limelight has not been at all good for her.

        • Dom107 says

          Mar 20, 2016 at 11:50 am

          She is still very young and naive.Let her get her full education and more experience of lfe before hanging on every word.Media to blame probably!

  2. Jay Boo says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 10:42 am

    Muslims and the MSM easily ignore the part where Trump said.

    “Until we figure out what the hell is going on”

    • linnte says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:43 am

      Exactly! And no one seems to say anything about how Malala doesn’t live and support other women in her home country either.

      • billybob says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 8:40 pm

        They denounce her in her homeland as a propaganda tool of the West. She is not a hero there. Can you imagine? And the people that shot her in the head – they were Muslims, who get their motivation from the very same religion she defends. The irony. One might imagine that would make her think? If a Muslim shot me in the head, I wouldn’t be out advocating for Islam once I got back on my feet, that’s for sure!

        • Malala is fostering hatred says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 5:01 am

          Her life was saved by western medicine/Christian/jewish doctors and yet Malala goes out of her way to defend the barbaric religion that resulted in her being shot. It gives an insight into the cultural indoctrination Islam has on people. I think Winston Churchill said that once they are infected with Islam they are like rabid dogs. Almost possessed. The irony of her talking about “hatred” when her religion is nothing BUT hatred. It is self-preservation that motivates Trump and others, not hatred.

        • Dan B. says

          Feb 27, 2016 at 12:43 pm

          Well billybob, and most of you that have commented, and don’t seem to get the fact that there is a huge chasm between the terrorists interpretation of Islam and Malala’s and other sensible thinking Muslims. All of you need to understand the difference. The terrorists accuse these Muslims of being too western thinking (like you and I). That is why she was shot by ‘one of her own’, but NOT really one of her own. What’s going on has a lot of similarities to 200yrs of fighting between the Catholics and Protestants. Basically the same religion but extremely divided because of selfish interpretations. I don’t know if Trump’s ‘inside thoughts’ are hatred, but I will say that he is a bigot and prejudiced for how he has talked about Mexicans as well as Muslims.

    • Spot On says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 3:28 pm

      Muslim hatred for non Muslims runs deeper than the deepest ocean and from cradle to the grave. They have engaged in mortal combat with any non Muslims since their beginning with Mohammed, 1400 years ago.The MSM, who also shares deep hatred for us, and that is why they like Muslims.

      It is no more complicated than that. The MSM takes every opportunity to turn any normal non Muslim’s human reaction to this threat against us.

      • Carolyne says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 11:23 am

        This teenager is often vaunted as a “Defender of women’s right to an education.” I really do not know what she did. Did she say that on the school bus in which she was shot in the head? I don’t see that she had any kind of influential platform from which to make known her ideas. She became famous for being shot in the head. As someone else mentioned, she was saved by Western medicine in England. Yet, she still clings to her Seventh Century culture, not realizing that it wasn’t fanatics who shot her and who oppose female education, but Islam itself. We do not need her and we do not need more of her kind in the US. She is not some kind of icon of bravery, but a teenager who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

        Donald Trump is right. Muslims need to be stopped from entering the US until we have a sensible way to determine who might be a ticking time bomb and who might not. It is my belief that a practicing Muslim who follows the Koran is a ticking time bomb. We don’t want them here. Sorry kid. You vote in the Pakistani elections if you are allowed as a woman, and we will tend the US, which does not wish to lose its culture to Islamic barbarians.

        • Marylu Bano says

          Feb 27, 2016 at 12:15 am

          Well said, Carolyne!!
          ?????????????????????????

      • Sandra Lee Smith says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 3:48 pm

        Yes they do; and they use words like “hate”, “bigotry”, and “Islamophobia” to shut down any meaningful and rational dialogue on the subject of what Islam actually is, what it requires of its followers, and why it has NO business being admitted to this nation, against our longstanding (since ’52) law prohibiting those who come from cultures bent on overthrowing our government from being allowed to emigrate to the US.

    • Peggy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 9:55 pm

      That implys that once we figure it out they can start coming in again?
      What happens after we figure it out?
      Hopefully the ban on Muslims will stay in place for at leat a thousand years. Maybe by then they will reach the level of civilization like the one we have today at least. They will always be at least a thousand years behind but if there is a chance they will slowly progress then maybe we can thik about letting them in again.

      • Dacritic says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 12:08 pm

        No, once we “figure it out”, and the good readers of Jihadwatch I trust had already done so, we would do well to shut the doors permanently, or we get them to try to defend Islam at the immigration checkpoints, failing which no entry is to be granted. Islam is like a virus, and Muslims are the carriers. If you are a Muslim you carry with you the virus in your head, and no one, not even yourself, can tell when this “accursed” (Gladstone) virus would manifest and turn you into another bomberman. Trump is right, but he needs more tuition from Robert Spencer.

      • Sandra Lee Smith says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 3:50 pm

        By that time it will be moot; Jesus will have returned, claimed His rightful throne and there will be no Muslims left to go anywhere or do anything.

      • Carolyne says

        Feb 27, 2016 at 3:31 pm

        Well, no one actually said that we would ever “Figure it out.” It could take years—centuries.
        I am not counting on Jesus’ arrival.

    • Dacritic says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      Getting more and more disillusioned with Yahoo.

  3. Myxlplik says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 10:43 am

    Islam incites violence against those who Insult it or Mohammed, and non-Muslims in general who don’t abide by its rules.

    Excluding Muslims from immigration is wise prudence not hatred.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 5:05 pm

      “Excluding Muslims from immigration is wise prudence not hatred.”

      Yes.

      Got Muslims? Got Jihad. That is the long and short of it.

      *Wherever* Muslims go, sooner or later there is Jihad, the ‘struggle’, both by force and by fraud, by *every* imaginable means, by hook or by crook, to achieve Muslim dominance and impose and enforce the Sharia of Islam.

      In the light of that observable fact *every* majority-Infidel country in the world should be slamming its gates shut against *any* and *all* entry of Muslims into their territory…and if they’re already afflicted with a mohammedan colony that has gotten in legally or illegally then they need to recognise, grimly, that it is a dangerous Fifth Column and should not be accommodated or appeased in any way but, rather, strongly discouraged from remaining.

    • Peggy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 9:58 pm

      It’s self preservation. We are all allowed to want to stay alive and free.

  4. IQ al Rassooli says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 10:59 am

    Malala is the usual DELUSIONAL so called Muslima who still wears the Hijab which is the sign of her submission and degradation to Sharia

    No one is asking her, as a Muslima who believes in Muhammad’s Quran what does she call ALL humans who are NOT Muslims? (Kuffar/ Infidels)

    Also, if these ‘immigrants’ are so ‘peaceful’ WHY have they not been welcomed by a SINGLE Muslim or Arab country?

    Her stupidity, duplicity and hypocrisy are exceeded only by the MEDIA that give her space to print or interview her

    IQ al Rassooli
    Kafir & Proud!

    • mortimer says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      Agree with IQ: she is stupid…as evidenced by her ignorance of the Islamic doctrine of apartheid called ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ (i.e. to associate with Muslims and to distance oneself from dirty kafirs.)

      • mortimer says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 pm

        Agree with IQ: By wearing the veil, Malala agrees that women are second-class and do not deserve human rights.

        Malala is a perfect example of the Islamic Stockholm syndrome…the self-identification of women with their captors and their defense of their captors abuse.

        She contradicts her case for female equality by wearing the symbol of submission to male supremacism and the symbol of Islamic repression and abuse of women.

        • Cunamarra says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 1:06 pm

          In Allah’s revelation I find that he reversed the criteria of judging good from evil. When I discuss the many travesties that result from Islam with Muslims, even when they come across something that makes them feel very uncomfortable they will never attribute any problems to Islam or Muhammad’s example.

          In short, Muslims wouldn’t know what is wrong with Islam even if it walked up and shot them in the head.

        • DAI says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 10:56 pm

          Me,I hate her and her helpers. She is a fraud and a danger. I wish she had died. Ugly raghead. DEATH TO ISLAM

      • Atheist7 says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 3:54 pm

        Yes, As has been said: “By wearing the veil, Malala agrees that women are second-class and do not deserve human rights”. I wonder how much her views have changed after her head shot. Perhaps the attack caused some brain damage.

      • Annak says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 11:48 pm

        Not only stupid but narcisstic. She won fame because ? She was degraded as a girl under Islamic Taliban, got shot for disobeying Islam, her male masters according to Islam, and Western doctors saved her life?
        Shouldn’t this very insignificant female just be praising the West and all it’s benefits and if sane would have left Islam.?
        I have no time for this irritating precocious female and never did.

        • Marylú Bano says

          Feb 28, 2016 at 9:55 pm

          I completely agree with you, Anne!
          She got fame for what?, for getting shot in the head?,..and not dying because christian science saved her muslim ass?,..give us a break!!

      • Carolyne says

        Feb 27, 2016 at 3:38 pm

        The problem with her not associating with the dirty kaffir is that her own kind did not have the training, skills, intelligence or desire to save her life when she was shot in the head by those she is now defending. Only those in the West could perform the delicate operations she required to live. It is funny that she still defends those who did this to her. She is an idiot who is likely under the thumb of some Muslim male, probably her father, who tells her what to say. I note the whole family lives in England, not Pakistan. They can talk the talk, but not walk the walk.

        • Marylú Bano says

          Feb 28, 2016 at 9:49 pm

          Exactely, Carolyne!

    • Senthil Kumar says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 4:56 pm

      By stating “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” has she insinuated that Islam is an intolerant religion???

    • Kilfincelt says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:16 pm

      Agreed! Muslima speak with forked tongue. Also, she is another fine example of why the Noble Peace prize has become a joke.

  5. Cuchulainn says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:08 am

    Obviously the bullet the “brothers” put in her head has had a detrimental effect on her brain!

    • mortimer says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:15 pm

      Cuchulainn wrote: ‘Obviously the bullet the “brothers” put in her head …has had a detrimental effect ‘

      The bullet did not remove the absurdity of believing a pedophile, a pirate, a prevaricator, a polygamist, an enslaver, a necrophile, and a mass murderer was a gentle, kind or loving man to be emulated.

      Islam’s absurdities are abundantly apparent to any average, rational person.

      Malala is an example of the depth of Islamic brainwashing. Even a bullet in the brain and 24-hour body guards do not remove this intense delusion.

  6. Veritas says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:14 am

    A devoted Muslim wants to cut off your head.

    How many moderate Muslims want a devoted Muslim to cut off your head?

    • mortimer says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:16 pm

      To veritas: A ‘moderate’ Muslim holds your feet while the ‘extremist’ cuts off your head.

      • dlbrand says

        Feb 27, 2016 at 3:42 am

        The “moderate” also provides zakat funds, used, in part for the training, arming and deploying of the mujihadeen.

  7. Mo says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:19 am

    Why is this stupid girl still following and defending the same death cult that nearly killed her?

    • miriamrove says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:11 pm

      Because Islam is a disease. M

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 1:29 pm

      And despite her constant shilling for Islam, truly pious Muslims *hate* her:

      “Pakistani teachers launch ‘I Am Not Malala’ to counter ‘anti-Islamic propaganda’”

      http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/11/pakistani-teachers-launch-i-am-not-malala-to-counter-anti-islamic-propaganda

  8. Northern Virginiastan says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:21 am

    Marie Claire is indeed a fashion magazine, but like many fashion magazines , it pushes a liberal to leftist view in its non-fashion and non-beauty stories, which is why I prefer more apolitical magazines like Allure and InStyle.

    • Karen says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:35 am

      Both of those are good, yes.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 1:37 pm

      Marie Claire has run articles whitewashing Islam several times before. Here’s one:

      “12 Muslim Women Shatter Stereotypes by Showing Off Their Style”

      http://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/news/g3060/muslim-women-style-fashion/

      The subtitle is “It’s time to banish the idea of the ‘oppressed’ Muslim woman”

      Uh huh–tell that to all the victims of FGM, forced marriage, and “Honor Killing”. For that matter, tell that to Malala, shot in the head by the Taliban for daring to want an education.

      But what does Marie Claire care? Acknowledging any of this would be “Islamophobic”.

    • Peggy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 10:08 pm

      What really qualifies Jackie Frank to use her magazine to pretend like she has some knowledge of Islam.
      Her knowledge on the subject is obviously minimal. She is involved in fashion and probably the reason she got that far is because her mother is a hairdresser who got a lucky break and got famous.
      I wonder if anyone reading that magazine takes her seriously on it.

  9. Karen says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:27 am

    No offense to the young lady, and with all the deference due her, isn’t she a victim of the worst in Islam?

    I realize there is a bit of a protective bubble around Malala, for obvious reasons, so I don’t expect Marie Claire (yes, it’s a fashion mag!), or any of the media, to challenge her in any way. But let’s examine her central statement:

    “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.”

    If that is true, what does it say about the people who become terrorists? Can a certain background level of disapproval toward Islam turn peaceable people into vicious, murdering terrorists? This doesn’t seem to make any sense at all, especially if Islam is a ‘religion of peace’. And if the statement isn’t true, then it’s actually disinformation, intended to stifle legitimate discussion.

    In the end, she is likely just very young, and saying things that come from an earnest heart, but that are rather empty of substance.

    • Mo says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:43 am

      @ Karen

      “No offense to the young lady, and with all the deference due her”

      Why?

      I felt very sorry for her when I first heard her story. No one should have to endure such an attack. I was very happy to learn she had survived and was doing well. But to see this girl now STILL following the death cult that very nearly killed her and going around the world defending, excusing and promoting this same death cult makes me very angry.

      From the biographies I’ve seen, she will be 19 years old this summer. That is no longer a little child. With all she’s been through, she should know what Islam is all about. And again, she still now CHOOSES to follow it.

      She is misleading people. That needs to be countered, and strongly. Just because she’s still young, just because she was once a victim does not mean she is forever immune to criticism. She is due no less respect than what is given to any other person. But she is due no more than that, especially on this issue!

      • Karen says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 12:14 pm

        You know, that phrase ‘due deference’ has a qualifier. 🙂 I actually agree strongly that no media personality should be immune from criticism, even a 19 year old one.

        You are right, she is misleading people whether she knows it or not. And you are quite right, that needs to be strongly counteracted. I tried to do a little of that above. I’m both sympathetic of her tragic past, while being cynical of her public and media endeavors, which at best are fluff and nothingness. Hopefully time will mature her perspective, but I suspect family and the media will continue to reinforce the role she’s now playing. It’s possible they even benefit from it. She is likely trapped in her own fame for now, unless she decides to do something bold and independent.

        • Mo says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 12:19 pm

          @ Karen

          “She is likely trapped in her own fame for now, unless she decides to do something bold and independent.”

          Yes, that is true. She’s young. There’s still hope for her. She could be a strong voice for the counter-jihad movement, if one day she wakes up. I hope she will.

        • Peggy says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 10:13 pm

          Mo says

          February 25, 2016 at 12:19 pm

          @ Karen

          “She is likely trapped in her own fame for now, unless she decides to do something bold and independent.”
          ————————————-
          I won’t hold my breth on that one. The only think this silly girl is likely to do is join them. She has said as much. If you say bad things about Islam or Muslims you deserve to be hit. Her bold statement could just be the one which detonates.

        • LR says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 1:26 am

          How many girls have the courage to face death threats at only 12 yrs. of age? And of course she wouldn’t have been able to do this without her parents great love, support and courage to weather the storm.

          I don’t think she is trapped in her own fame, as much as it is simply wanting to defend her own religion/culture. Even though she was shot by the Taliban/al Queda, she has also experienced great love and support from her community and parents who support women’s education.

          Everyone has their blind spots. Some are just more serious than others.

          Casting away certain belief systems you have been brought up with is not an easy thing to do, and many people never do. Most people accept what they are taught growing up. I am still astounded by all the ignorant religious beliefs and cults within our own culture here. It’s usually a matter of fulfilling some emotional need.

          It would have been quite interesting and valuable, for the writer to have respectfully asked Malala about the problem within her statement.

          Hopefully, people will keep approaching this subject with Muslims, and others in our own country. It’s the least we can do.

      • Carolyne says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 1:29 pm

        Yes, she is 19 now and judged by Islam to be a bit long in the tooth. but nevertheless, I see a first cousin marriage in her future. 90% of Pakistanis who are married are married to their first cousins. And it will be a marriage arranged by her parents. Benazir Bhutto, later PM of Pakistan, was Vassar and Oxford educated, yet returned to Pakistan to a marriage arranged by her mother to a man she didn’t even know. She said it was her duty. She was, of course,assassinated.

        Her Nobel prize is as valuable as those given to Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. For nothing but to, as a member of the committee said, kick America in the knee, which must be a great insult in Norway.

        She is an emotional prisoner of Islam, as demonstrated by her veil, and her knowledge of western life is limited to the inside of an English Hospital which saved her life Pakistan, a produce of Islam, was not capable of doing so.

        Islam, which has contributed nothing to the quality of life of anyone, is only destructive of it. This girl is a product of it. Unable to have a single thought to the left or the right of the prevailing culture in Pakistan.

    • Cunamarra says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 1:25 pm

      I have found that too many Muslims maintain the facade of peacefulness until you reveal that you know what they and Islam are about. Deception is an integral part of Islam. So much so that if you could remove it it would no longer be Islam. It would be something different.

      Unfortunately for Malala she wouldn’t know what is wrong with Islam if it walked up to her and shot her in the head. She is likely surrounded by people who are busy destroying her mind and numbing it to all reason.

      • PRCS says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 4:03 pm

        “Unfortunately for Malala she wouldn’t know what is wrong with Islam if it walked up to her and shot her in the head.”

        Surely she knows by now it wasn’t “self radicalized” Presbyterians who shot her, eh.

      • Peggy says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 10:15 pm

        Unfortunately for Malala she wouldn’t know what is wrong with Islam if it walked up to her and shot her in the head.
        ———————————-
        Best quote yet.

  10. John Thomas says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:35 am

    Hmm. When I was her age (19) I knew everything. Clearly she’s the same.

  11. Jerry in Minneapolis says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:37 am

    I think Malala is a very intelligent and courageous young woman. However, I also think she is defending terrorism when she says, “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.” First, it’s fallacious to say I speak against “muslims,” of course not all muslims are “bad.” I’m against the ideology of muslims because I know its supremacist agenda is incompatible with western culture and is a catalyst for terrorism and war. Her subtle misconstruction of the facts is a moral inversion, a way of cursing our argument in defense of human rights while defending islam’s immoral agenda. And I feel immensely justified in my concerns about a burgeoning muslim population, it is the consummate means of transport and maturation for that ideology. I’m not against “muslims.” I can speak against disease without hating humans, and I can speak against islam without hating muslims. I care as much about the muslim condition as I do my own. But not if it means I must forego freedom and human rights in the process.

    Using Malala’s reasoning one could defend any kind of evil by proposing the ill-consequence of speaking against it. With that stance Malala is speaking ill of all non-muslims by implying that our concerns are bigoted and hateful. But gosh darn, us moral people can’t help ourselves. I don’t feel at all responsible if by defending moral truth my enemies respond by doubling their efforts to harm my country and its citizens. It makes more sense for me to fight evil doubled now than to willingly submit to its full effects later.

    • Karen says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:45 am

      This is one of the best rebuttals of the Islamophobia strategy I’ve ever read. Really excellent; I’ll come back and re-read this many times.

      • mortimer says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 12:19 pm

        Do not call Hitler names after invading Czechoslovakia and Poland…because it will make him mad.

        • Karen says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 12:43 pm

          Ha, exactly! We may be saying similar things about Iran one day, if/when they obtain a certain weapon…..

      • Pong says

        Mar 3, 2016 at 12:31 am

        Karen, in that case you might like: I am against pedophilia, but not against pedophiles, or those who support them.

    • Pong says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 4:08 pm

      “of course not all muslims are “bad.”
      So, if someone believes that the group they belong is the best people, apostasy should be punished by death, women are second class and infidels have to sabmit or killed, they still be good people ?
      If it is possible, we should stop fighting islam. If people carry an ideology and still be good, it isn’t ideology that makes other people bad.

    • Pong says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 4:21 pm

      “I think Malala is a very intelligent and courageous young woman.”
      At 18 she is already cynical to the core. She knows that speaking against islam would not get her an interview with a fashion magazine. She is also a traitor to millions of women suffering under islam. Intelligent and courageous? Please, look up a dictionary for the meaning of those words.

      • LR says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 1:51 am

        Well, she did get death threats starting at age 12, and she and her family didn’t back down to the Taliban. That is pretty darn courageous.

        I don’t think she is cynical to the core. I think you might be projecting some of your own cynicism.

      • Carolyne says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 1:45 pm

        Yes, she is “cynical to the core.” By contending that terrorists will be created simply by criticizing Islam, she is admitting to the violence created by the core tenets of Islam. “Don’t criticize me or I’ll kill you.” You can take the girl out of Pakistan, but you can’t take Pakistan out of the girl.

        • Pong says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 2:13 pm

          It seems there is something “special” about Pakistani moslems. Cannot consider myself as an expert, hope that someone can shed more light on the subject. I don’t know any moslem personally, but to an outsider Pakistanis seems to be the worst of all the moslems. Is it something to do with them being the lowest cast among the Hindus, or any other reason, not sure.

    • LR says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 1:38 am

      Exactly.

      Well stated Jerry.

  12. Stuart Smith says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:38 am

    Send her back to Pakistan, so she can see the full hatred of muslims when she is back at school.

    • Jay Boo says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:47 am

      Have her convert to Christianity first.

  13. Lee says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:38 am

    It is not hatred to promote the eradication and liquidation of infidels. This is simply an effort to bring peace, as Muhammed encouraged us to do, Just as it is completely normal to use infidel women, girls, and boys for Muslim men’s depravities. This is entirely moral and right. Why the islamophobia? (Completely facetious)

  14. pdxnag says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:40 am

    The existence of conflict among Islamists as to the purity of each other’s commitment to true Islam will have victims. This does not necessarily make those Muslims saintly. Any so-called moderate Muslim who has kids will invariably still give rise to the next generation of Jihadis if they consult the core texts, rather than their less-Islamic parents, and follow the commands.

    The threshold question for me is the rejection of Islam because of it’s call for inherently violent subjugation of others and replacement of the same by an embrace of love for individual liberty and freedom. Freedom cannot be experienced by any unless all embrace and protect the liberty of others. Muslims represent a rotten apple in the box.

    The freedom of an Islamist or community of Islamists to impose their will on their neighbors is not the kind of freedom I have in mind. Nor will Islamists offer anything other than lip service to defend the liberty of the viscerally-hated Kafir. (A hate that is vigorously reinforced every time Muslims “pray.”) Their presence represents an asymmetric battlefront going forward, always reducing the sphere of and vigor of respect for individual liberty.

    Malala’s point seems to be the same as Obama’s point, and both are reducible to this: your rejection of Islam and those who propagate it causes violent angst among Muslims. (As always, as Obama says, the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam [, or those who reject Islam].)

    • Karen says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 11:50 am

      Your thoughts on freedom are inspiring. Another powerful post I’ll re-read many times….

  15. dom107 says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:41 am

    Much as I admire the courage of this young women standing up for the education of muslim women in muslim societies all around the world she is however young and inexperienced and doesn’t realise that appeasing and being nice to extremists of any hue only encourages them to further evil behaviour. The UK found this out with Hitler and the Nazis but doesn’t seem to have learnt the lesson.
    The reaction in UK to Trumps common sense words(factual without any hate emotion at all) was way over the top especially in the BBC. Guardian and other leftish media .In the Question Time discussion program I felt anyone who actually agreed with him was intimidated into being quiet as the whole tone of the program was set to ridicule and condemn Trump. What British politicians was Malala referring to
    They all seemed totally silenced by the hysteria surrounding this speech and the Muslim problem seems to be off limits in the current referendum debate
    Watch how they change their attitude if Trump becomes President ? The lips are starting to pucker up already as Britain is always the first to kiss an American Presidents ass. e.g Tony Blair and GW Bush
    ,Ronald Reagan and Mrs Thatcher. McMillan and Kennedy e.t.c e.t.c

  16. Jay Boo says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:45 am

    Shut the hell up, Malala
    Has she forgotten —

    In Malala Yousafzai’s home country of Pakistan Christians are not trying to (get in) but escape just to survive because of severe persecution.

    • Myxlplik says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 3:10 pm

      Malala is essentially a type of spiritual Typhoid Mary, victim and carrier of death all wrapped in one pathetic package.

  17. Myxlplik says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:52 am

    This article leads me to think of the sentiment behind, “Something old, something new”. “Something old represents continuity; something new offers optimism for the future.”

    Hope not hate:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35660488

  18. mortimer says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:54 am

    The classical APARTHEID doctrine of Islam is called ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’. It is one of the three ‘usul ud deen’ (essential doctrines of the Islamic faith) as well as the best supported with Koranic scripture and hadiths. HATING KAFIRS is what Islam is all about. 60% of the Koran is the rant that Allah hates kafirs and want Muslims to treat them violently. Islam is basically an excuse to be violent to others.

    Saudi Arabia’s Permanent Committee for Islamic Research and Issuing Fatwas [1]—which issues religious decrees that become law—issued a fatwa, or decree, titled, “Duty to Hate Jews, Polytheists, and Other Infidels.” Written by Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz (d. 1999), former grand mufti and highest religious authority in the government, it still appears on the website.

    According to this governmentally-supported fatwa, Muslims—that is, the entire Saudi citizenry—must “oppose and hate whomever Allah commands us to oppose and hate, including the Jews, the Christians, and other mushrikin [non-Muslims], until they believe in Allah alone and abide by his laws, which he sent down to his Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings upon him.”

    To prove this, Baz quotes a number of Koran verses that form the doctrine of Loyalty and Enmity—the same doctrine every Sunni jihadi organization evokes to the point of concluding that Muslim men must hate their Christian or Jewish wives (though they may enjoy them sexually).

    These Koran verses include: “Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your friends and allies” (5:51) and “You shall find none who believe in Allah and the Last Day on friendly terms with those who oppose Allah and His Messenger [i.e., non-Muslims]—even if they be their fathers, their sons, their brothers, or their nearest kindred” (58:22; see also 3:28, 60:4, 2:120).

    After quoting the verses, Baz reiterates:

    “Such verses are many and offer clear proofs concerning the obligation to despise infidels from the Jews, Christians, and all other non-Muslims, as well as the obligation to oppose them until they believe in Allah alone.”

    Hatred of disbelievers is, therefore, normative Islam and not an aberration as Islamic apologists, and dhimmis like Obama, Cameron and Kerry claim.

    The source texts and their authentic interpretations by top Islamic authorities say otherwise. I will take the word of Islam’s top authorities when they are teaching Muslims.

  19. Bradamante says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:54 am

    I’m a lifelong Democrat, but I’m considering voting for Trump just because he’s the only one who’s said anything sensible about the migrant crisis. I know that in the past, Robert Spencer has been very disappointed with Trump’s lack of understanding of some important issues, but still. It’s mind-blowing to me that “temporary moratorium until we figure out what the hell is going on” is portrayed in the media as practically equivalent to Hitler’s threatening to kill all the Jews. Back when we were fighting the Communists, we *had* a moratorium on Communists entering the country, and so what?

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 1:42 pm

      Ted Cruz is not perfect, but he has at least mentioned the threat of terrorism from immigration, as well.

      I wish there were *someone* on the Democratic side addressing this at all, but there is not.

      • LR says

        Feb 26, 2016 at 10:17 am

        “My Shari’a Moor”…Haha, pretty good. I give you credit for being inventive with that one.

    • Jaladhi says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 2:49 pm

      There will be a lot of Democrats who will be voting for Trump, if he is the Republican nominee. This phenomena will be just like those of “blue collar Democrats” for Reagan! Democratic party is clueless and won’t know what hit them in the election – Trump Express!

      • linnte says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 4:18 pm

        Just changed my registration to Republican! This exDemocrat wants a change!

      • Peggy says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 11:00 pm

        I believe that a lot of Democrats are secret Republicans by now.
        Because of Republican bashing and making Democrats look righteous for so long in American shows it’s made people think that if they vote Republican something must be wrong with them.
        Obama has done much to turn this around in people’s minds at least.
        Hollywood, NBC, HBO etc will take a little longer.

    • My Shari'a Moor says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 7:33 pm

      Hi Bradamante,

      I was a Dem ’til JUNE (now an Indie) & will be voting for TRUMP on 1MAR16, Super Tuesday!
      No problem at all, ‘coz to MY mind, the Dems & the GOPelitists have gone pro-Shari’a!
      It’s clear to me that TRUMP is the USA’s (& the world’s) last HOPE, ‘coz only HE is saying common-sense statements, while everyone else (at BEST!) can only come up with a feeble “Me, too, Donald!”!
      Yes, Donald J. Trump “GETS” Islam!
      See: ‘TheConservativeTreeHouse.com’!

      Regards,

      MSM

      WOLVERINES!

      #Cold Anger

  20. Angemon says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:56 am

    Malala Yousafzai Delivers the Elegant Donald Trump Rebuttal You’ve Been Waiting For

    Let me guess: she’s going to call Trump a hate-filled bigot – that would be my reaction to reading this title had the JW article not spoiled it for me 🙂

    In an interview with United Kingdom’s Channel 4, Yousafzai warned hateful politicians about the danger of their anti-Muslim messages: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” she said. A good point—and a terrifying one, too.

    No, a terrible point – it fails to give us the origin story of the first islamic terrorist and instead pictures islamic terrorist as a catch-22 situation: talking about the ideological roots of islamic terrorism creates terrorists and not talking about it prevents fighting against it.

    She also commented this week more specifically about Donald Trump and his proposal that all Muslims be banned from entering the United States, calling it “full of hatred.”

    No, you know what? I think she’s absolutely right, and I think she should lead by example and start taking in people from Pakistan in her home. Because, as we all know, only hate-filled bigots think there are terrorists coming in with the “Syrian” “refugees”, or that there are non-Syrian, non-refugees, among them, and therefore the chances of having a Pakistani taliban going after her to finish the job is zero, right? How about it, Malala? Are you willing to take in “Syrian” “refugees” in your home, no questions asked?

    • mortimer says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:00 pm

      Miss Malala lives safely in UK, rather than in PAKISTAN…the home of peace and Islamic ‘love’.

      She lives protected by British body guards…not Muslim Pakistani body guards. She does not trust Muslims to protect her.

      • Charli Main says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 1:46 pm

        This Muslima parasite has been sponging of the British taxpayer for years. and never misses an opportunity to play the ” Muslim victim ” card.
        She has made NO effort to integrate into British society and continues to dress, live and behave as a Muslim.
        Oh, she also never misses a chance to practice islam, by biting the hand that has been feeding her for years, at every opportunity.
        This Muslima scum bag should of been sent back to Pakistan years ago.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 7:38 pm

          Charli Main wrote:

          She has made NO effort to integrate into British society and continues to dress, live and behave as a Muslim.

          Oh, she also never misses a chance to practice islam, by biting the hand that has been feeding her for years, at every opportunity.
          …………………….

          Charli, Malala Yousafzai has made an explicit point of this:

          “I’m not becoming western; I am still following my Pashtun culture, and I’m wearing a shalvar kamiz, a dupatta on my head.”

          She has also said–with a straight face, apparently–this:

          “Pakistan is a peace-loving, democratic country”.

        • Charli Main says

          Feb 26, 2016 at 4:00 am

          @ gravenimage

          The despicable ” Saint” Malala has never once spoken out against the genocidal treatment of non Muslims in her beloved Pakistan. The destruction of their churches and temples, FMG, honour killings, child marriage, forced marriage or the rapes of little boys and girls by imams down at the local mosque.
          but then why should she ???As a Muslim, she sees nothing wrong in her beloved Pakistani countrymen practicing her beloved Islam.
          “Saint” Malala is just your bog standard, two faced Muslim hypocrite living off Western Jizya.

    • jimmy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 2:52 pm

      she is not a hero. she and her family are devout Muslim. she was shoot because Taliban shoot vans. She wasn’t shoot a blank point because she is against the taliban nor the radicals or pro education.. no one survives a headshoot in the face twice.

      The rest is business, propaganda and career.

  21. mortimer says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:58 am

    Would Miss Malala believe it ‘hatred’ if Pakistan were to impose a temporary ban on HINDUS entering Pakistan in a situation where HINDU TERRORISTS were arrested by Pakistani police on a weekly, if not daily, basis?

    She would certainly be in favor of a ban on HINDU TERRORISTS if Pakistan had a HINDU terrorism problem.

    Her protest is thus entirely one-sided and HYPOCRITICAL. But there is no HINDU TERRORIST problem in Pakistan because HINDUS have a genuine RELIGION OF PEACE without HYPOCRISY.

  22. Nikko says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:59 am

    why did she give all that money to the muslim brotherhood ?

  23. tpalya says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 12:00 pm

    “Trumps immigration ban is full of hatred”

    SO WHAT!

    • mortimer says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 12:05 pm

      tpalya quoted: “Trumps immigration ban is full of hatred

      Islam’s doctrine of apartheid is also full of hate:

      -from Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”

      -from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show animosity and hatred towards disbelievers and never support them.”

      -from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, “Belief in Allah”: “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as enemies and hate them because of their kufr, just as he hates their kufr (disbelief) itself.”

      -from “The Islaamic Concept of al-Walaa’ wal-Baraa’” by Khalid El-Gharib: …“[iv] to show enmity to those who show enmity to Allaah and His Messenger”
      (Note: Muslims are to visibly demonstrate their enmity or hatred towards the kufaar)

      -from a lecture given by Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal (H.A.): “The implication of al-Baraa is that one hates for the sake of Allah (SWT)…Al-Baraa means to recognize who your enemies are and to hate them and exterminate them in their Endeavour to get rid of your Deen, al-Islam…Al-Baraa is to hate the people who propagate Baatil (falsehood)—the Muslim should hate them and (at least desire to) kill them when the time comes.”

      Islamic hatred of kafirs is authoritative, authentic and compulsory upon all Muslims.

      • IQ al Rassooli says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 1:52 pm

        mortimer

        I have been reading your comments that are truly enlightening as well as devastating regarding the depraved CULT belief system of Muhammad called Islam

        So many who are commenting on Jihad Watch have more knowledge of Muslims & Islam than the entirety of all the European leaders put together because they have read, studied and digested them and hence cannot be deceived by anyone.

        I sincerely hope that the ordinary men & women of Europe will rise up in the next few weeeks and take the law in their own hands because their leaders are taking them to the abyss of Sharia dominance

        IQ al Rassooli
        Kafir & Proud!

    • jimmy says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 2:58 pm

      would she say some day that Pakistan -like many other muslim nations- is famous by the discriminations against non muslim minorities?

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 2:05 pm

      I can’t speak for Trump, but I certainly support him.

      I can speak for myself, though. I am full of hatred for a people who, if you criticize them, shoot you in the head.

      I still don’t understand how she, as a child of 12 or so, had any kind of platform to speak out against repression of women. To whom did she speak?? Her fellow students on the school bus on which she was shot? If she were on a school bus, she was receiving an education. Her beloved Islam forbids educating women or treating any female in a humane way. Yet in her zeal to be thought some kind of progressive Muslim Joan of Arc, she only reconfirms her devotion to this cult by speaking against Donald Trump and wearing that thing on her head, a symbol of Muslim oppression of women. Why anyone would pay attention to what this twit says is beyond me.

      So she speaks as the voice of authority on the peacefulness of Islam, while admitting that they are prone to kill you if you say anything against them, while living in the safety of England and enjoying a Western lifestyle which is denied women in Pakistan, a country she apparently loves, but from afar.

  24. Babs says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 12:04 pm

    Just who has elevated this posessor of an overblown ego into a position to opine on anything?

  25. Voytek Gagalka says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 12:23 pm

    For her that is “full of hatred” because it directly undermines her (and other Mohammedans) agenda. For me it is the best proof that it must be really great idea which should be absolutely implemented without delay. Why? “Hit the table sufficiently hard and scissors will answer”!

  26. somehistory says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 12:33 pm

    It is a fact that victims often victimize others….those who suffer child abuse may abuse their own child; a young man shot at may get a gun and shoot at others; someone who is cheated may choose to cheat others; etc.

    This girl, this young fool of a girl, was a victim. Now she is making victims of others.
    She who should know better than to defend the awful code that put her life in danger and but for the charity of others not living by that code, would be dead. She should know better.

    She says it is hatred to deny moslims a chance to come into this country without being sure they will not kill at the first opportunity or encourage others to kill.
    Well, little Missy, it is hatred….hatred of the death and destruction that is directly related to the devout adherence to islam.

    If saying ilsam is a death cult and that devout adherents will kill to further its spread, and that adherents shouldn’t have automatic trust thrown upon them by everyone else makes them angry enough to kill, then the ones saying those things are right to say them.

    She is living as she wishes the rest of us to live…she lives in fear. Otherwise, she would go home. But she wants the rest of us to open our arms to the ones she fears and accept them and not say we fear them. We should fear offending them. We should fear their anger. We should give them money.

    She has no more authority to speak against what others say than someone who has been victimized and not been made the little darling of the media.
    She is victimizing all non moslims and moslims who wish they could safely leave the death cult that worships satan by defending it and giving money to those who kill.

    She is a fool. She is young enough, because she was helped to continue living, to find the courage to speak the truth instead of supporting those who would kill her…and the rest of us.

    • Western Canadian says

      Mar 2, 2016 at 10:31 pm

      Actually, I have to disagree on this one…. Abused children are more likely to have difficulty in standing up for themselves than the average, but tend to make up for it by being VERY strong at defending others. Children raised in an home (using the world very loosely) where one spouse abuses the other, do NOT more often than not become abuse or abused spouses…. Unless you live in an entire culture of rotted minds and festering ignorance, the typical islamic hellhole, most people manage to be better than that.

  27. Cynthia says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 12:59 pm

    It’s always a double standard with them. They consider themselves to be the superior race there is a twofold reason why other Islamic countries are not accepting refugees… One of course is obvious and that is terrorism. The other is simply that they would like to further the cause of Islam to the west. Unless you live it you never really know how totally backwards it is from the societies in the West. As I have seen and experienced… This is a very real threat and it is not to be taken lightly or your daughters and your grandchildren will suffer in the future. It is not hateful when you lock your doors at night to protect your family while they sleep. People need to take care of their own here. It is not being uncompassionate to protect yourself and the ones you love… Quite the opposite is true in this case. We need to quit saying judge not lest ye be judged. We must make judgement calls everyday. The word and says judge not according to appearance but Judge righteous judgment. So we are allowed to make that judgement and say that is wrong… It is wrong to second class women… It is wrong to rape and kill… It is wrong to kill for the sake of some false god… It is wrong to take a little children and make killers out of them… It is wrong to take little children for brides. We know the evil one comes to kill steal and destroy… God is merciful to show us what is happening in Europe France and other migrant countries. We need to make a wise judgment and the time has come. It is us or them… There is nothing in between.

  28. gravenimage says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:19 pm

    Malala Yousafzai: Trump’s Muslim immigration ban “full of hatred”
    ………………………..

    So we should uncritically let in the very sort of Jihadists who shot Malala in the head? How could that not be problematic?

    More:

    Meanwhile, Malala warned UK politicians: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.”
    ………………………..

    Uh huh. Which UK politicians ‘speaking about Islam and against all Muslims’ created the Taliban who shot Malala in the head? Waiting…

    The fact is that they Muslim world seems to have been great at creating terrorists all by itself. Might that have something to do with the creed of Islam itself?

    More:

    Malala also says more than she thinks she says. If Islam teaches peace, why will people criticizing it turn peaceful Muslims into violent terrorists? If people criticize Christianity, Christians don’t become terrorists. Malala reveals here that she knows that Islam has texts that teach hatred, violence and supremacism, and is essentially saying that Muslims are willing to ignore those texts unless non-Muslims get too far out of line, at which point they will embrace them.
    ………………………..

    Yup. It was the West that saved Malala’s life after she was shot in the head by the Taliban and left for dead–but now she is all too happy to castigate the West for its supposed “Islamophobia”–and is blaming us for creating the very terrorism she had to flee Dar-al-Islam to escape.

    Profoundly perverse–but not at all uncommon.

    More:

    “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create,” she said. A good point—and a terrifying one, too.
    ………………………..

    In other words, shut up, Infidels–don’t you dare mention how violent Muslims are, lest you want more of the same.

  29. jp says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:33 pm

    I think malala just made a gaffe: ” the more you talk about Muslims the more we create terrorists”. I thought it was doctrine that Muslims don’t create terrorists, western imperialists do. Accidental truth?

    • Nimrod says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 2:10 pm

      Someone needs to ask this apostate girl: Did you create the terrorist who shot you?

  30. Havoc says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:38 pm

    Muslim immigration ban works for me. Plus, we need to deport any within our borders.

  31. Kufar says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    Her noble efforts to get girls educated in her own country are admirable but because she is totally schizophrenic when she speaks out for Islam which devalues women. She wants the world at large to pretend that Islam and Muslims are inherently peaceful and trustworthy when we know better.

  32. Rob says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 pm

    It’s the Nobel Prize that does it.
    Look at BHO.

  33. Nimrod says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 1:58 pm

    Apparently, getting shot in the head doesn’t make you any smarter.

    Islam creates terrorists.

    Islam creates hatred (of kuffar and insufficiently devout Muslims).

    Islam retards education and rational thinking.

    The main problem that Muslims have is called Islam.

  34. Nimrod says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:01 pm

    ”That’s really tragic that you hear these comments which are full of hatred, full of this ideology of being discriminative toward others.”

    Sounds like she’s talking about Islam.

  35. Dave says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    Malala is big business , her books are all over Barnes and Nobles … In a third grade class I am familiar with the kids were given an assignment to select a biography of someone they admire and then present in the character of the protagonist a small project highlighting their achievements. Several girls picked Malala. This school was in a distant suburban almost rural district… its propaganda plan and simple.

  36. RCCA says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:29 pm

    I saw elsewhere (http://www.makers.com/blog/malala-donald-trump-muslim-proposal) Malala said, “… If we want to end terrorism we need to bring quality education so we defeat the mindset of terrorism mentality and of hatred.” I wonder if she thinks her Gaza investment is providing quality education. Wish someone would ask her about that.
    I see her as an apologist for Islam, not a reformer. Her celebrity as the “right kind of Muslim” will only make her more entrenched in that position, IMO.

  37. JawsV says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:37 pm

    I can’t stand this little b and her lies.

  38. Dan Jones says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:55 pm

    So if his ban is hatred all you followers of the pedophile then answer me this, where does beheading come in??

    More End Time News At:
    http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=4526

  39. TheOldOligarch says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    ”Malala reveals here that she knows that Islam has texts that teach hatred, violence and supremacism, and is essentially saying that Muslims are willing to ignore those texts unless non-Muslims get too far out of line, at which point they will embrace them.”

    There’s the gold. Right there.

  40. Champ says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 3:17 pm

    Hey Mattie Kahn gets my vote as ‘Useful Idiot of the Year’. I can hardly believe that someone can be so DUMB, yet here she is proving that it’s possible with her inane responses to Malala Yousafzai’s tripe.

    Sadly, Mattie probably represents the majority of Westerners whom also think this way, and who’ve failed to do their own homework by researching the unvarnished and ugly TRUTH about islam & company.

    • Champ says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 3:21 pm

      And perhaps I’m wrong …

      Maybe a *minority* of Westerners think the way that Mattie does. Hey I would looove to be wrong about this.

  41. Wellington says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 3:26 pm

    Since Islam is full of hatred for the unbeliever (e.g. Suras 60:4 and 98:6) any Muslim decrying hatred is, at best, an ignoramus, at worst, a rank hypocrite. No exceptions here.

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 2:18 pm

      Well, she was shot in the head—-you know…….

  42. No Fear says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 4:12 pm

    I don’t believe anyone who follows a “holy book” written by a military leader.

    • Champ says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 4:39 pm

      “military leader” aka mass-murderer!

  43. Ren says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 4:15 pm

    Malala is a good and kind girl. But she can be naive as well.

    • Mark Swan says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 1:52 am

      Do You Know Her Personaly?

    • Pong says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 11:01 pm

      I’m sure not as naive as you are.

  44. Atheist7 says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 4:23 pm

    I’m reposting Don McKellar’s post from November of 2015. I think that his views on Malala are correct and applies right now:

    Don McKellar says November 12, 2015 at 1:10 pm

    Malala is doing her part to soft-sell Islam on the world stage, don’t they know that? That little creepy monster has done more to advance sharia law than they ever will as she’s the politically correct media darling. The media elite will never, ever actually open up the texts she’s selling and have a look for themselves and realizing they’re promoting a nightmare world view. These anti-Malala moslems must realize that, don’t they? Or maybe they’re in on the whole scam?

    I have to scratch my head when I see things like this or the Islamic State railing on about how they’re against Obama. In both cases, the soft-sell Islamic spokesman/woman is advancing Islam and making things better for the hard-sell mad dog murdering jihadis. They have a mutually beneficial relationship. Their end goals are the same.

  45. Expat88 says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 4:52 pm

    Why does she even have an opinion about the subject of Trump’s proposal of temporarily limiting Muslim entry into the U.S.? She is not an American.

    Meanwhile, Malala warned UK politicians: “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.”

    This is an absurd statement. No one is speaking about all Muslims, and why would it be a problem to have more discussion rather than less discussion about any important issue such as extremism? Could more discussion or criticism of any issue induce a normal, rational human to go out and commit atrocities? What would it take to make you or I go out and do a terrorist act? She is complicit in knowing that it doesn’t take much to enrage her “peaceful” co-religionists. Sadly, she hasn’t learned anything after being a victim herself.

    • dom107 says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 11:01 am

      Its that reverse Islamic logic in action again. Don’t be critical or stop us coming to your country or more of us will turn nasty! Another example of this strange thinking I heard from one of the Palestinian leaders a few weeks back was directed at the West when he said something to the effect of,Do we have to start attacking your airports and planes again to get more attention. Well he tried that back in the 70s and it didn’t work and the West have run out of ideas now.!
      I think he was jealous of Daesh/Syria being in the news instead of the Israel/Palestine conflict.
      They seem to think we have some magic power to solve all the in fighting in the Islamic world:
      Why don’t they ask Alah to bring peace to his followers. So far he has done nothing good for them at all.
      Try thinking with the rational part of your brain guys. The heart is only a pump for blood, and emotions and old books written for a primitive desert people are not good masters and have been leading you astray for many centuries.

  46. God Almighty says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 7:00 pm

    And to think we now have the miscreant living in the UK…

    • Judi says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 2:29 am

      Yes, not only her but her entire family who have been treated with kid gloves. They have been given accommodation and her father has been given a cushy government job too.

  47. bloggerd says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 10:05 pm

    The immigrants need to read Jer 29:7 “Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare”.

  48. ripsi says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:33 pm

    so after being shot, nearly die and disfigured for life for trying to get an education in a moslem country while being moslem. this girl is still moselm and defending islam! what kind of mental gymnastics one has to do to live with themselves!!!

  49. Asdis says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 11:41 pm

    I’m a lifelong Dem and I’m voting for Trump.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Feb 27, 2016 at 12:04 pm

      Amen Brother. You escaped. Glad to have you.

      Now if you could only convince my idiot brother….but you won’t. He’s always the towing genius in the room at all the family gatherings full of 100% It was real swell having him march on the National Mall with his peacenik pals, holding their “Bush lies, while kids die” signs while 500,000 other brothers and I spent 6 years over there getting shot at.

  50. dlbrand says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 3:11 am

    “ the problem that Trump’s proposal is trying to address: how to keep jihad terrorists out of the country.”

    Indeed, indeed, indeed.

    How dare anyone, and all the more so, how dare one running for the office of the US Presidency think much less voice—repeatedly, and consistently—such a notion?

    O the gall!!!!!

    “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims,”warned Yousafzai, “the more terrorists we create.”

    No! Surely not… Why, never in a million years could we have suspected …

  51. logdon says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 3:19 am

    You can take the girl out of Islam but you’ll never take Islam from the girl.

  52. logdon says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 3:32 am

    Does anyone remember Vogue Magazines gushing interview with Asma al-Assad entitled A Rose in the Desert?

    Here it is. They tried to remove it from record but apparently one survived.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/01/the-only-remaining-online-copy-of-vogues-asma-al-assad-profile/250753/

    The virtue signalling doesn’t get worse. If it’s Muslim it must be exotically marvellous and so it is with this bit of Islamophilic fluff.

    They don’t care about reality or unreality for that matter, but does any establishment figure or entity these days?

  53. D jbo says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 4:27 am

    Meanwhile, no one has ever given us a satisfactory explanation as to why the migrants are in the majority, just young men? Or how leaving their families defenceless in Syria is helping them? Or how young muslim men accustomed to Islamic society are going to manage culturally and most important sexually, without muslim women? What on earth is going on?

    • linnte says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 9:43 pm

      A resounding EXACTLY to your words! There are verses in the Qur’an that describe this situation to the letter. Emigrate in the way of Allah and infiltrate and cause them to turn them into Muslims. (My paraphrase). It is an army that has invaded Europe and the Left is completely blind!! Go figure! A deliberate invasion- and soon there will be Civil War. 🙁

  54. K. says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 5:07 am

    The only thing full of hatred here is ISLAM. Rejection is nothing but a reaction to this. If someone with Malala’s personal experiences can’t understand this simple fact, then there is really no hope. Go live in peace with your prize money, girl.

  55. prof andrew michael says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 7:24 am

    The self-righteous holier than thou Malalala sickens me. She lives in the UK and has the audacity to criticise how western women dress. She also criticised western pop music and called it evil. These people make me sick, they come to the UK where they are free to do as they please and yet this Malalala had issues around western lifestyle. Please go and get out and go back to your hellhole that you love so much. There are people in the UK that find her inspirational, a breath of fresh air, I do not think so.

  56. sidney penny says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 7:29 am

    “And finally, why is Marie Claire cheerleading for Malala’s remarks? ”

    What did you expect, the article is written by MATTIE KAHN, a Muslim who cheers ” Our sentiments exactly.”

  57. sidney penny says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 7:32 am

    You keep hitting the nail on the head.

    “Malala also says more than she thinks she says. If Islam teaches peace, why will people criticizing it turn peaceful Muslims into violent terrorists?”

  58. chaisson says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 12:54 pm

    She makes an intelligent point that a lot of these people who are commenting don’t seem to understand. It’s one thing if you want to bad mouth a group of people because of what you seen in the media, but it would be better if you try and understand people’s lives before you judge them.

    I know, I know… a lot of you people are stuck in your ways, and your beliefs are perfect, but don’t knock someone or something down because you have a different opinion.

    she is right… the hatred will only lead to more violence.

    but you people are so proud of this shitty country we live in; where our leaders lie and cheat us everyday. where the big banks basically control everything we do , that most of you fail to understand anything different. How about you people who are sooooooooo opinionated actually do some research about Islam before you speak on Islam.

    And no, I’m not Islamic. I’m a Baptist living in a Republican state.

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 8:15 pm

      You would be a perfect candidate to go live in a Muslim state since you know nothing about it. You could learn.

      Most of the people here can quote you chapter and verse from the Koran, Hadiths and Sharia law. We understand very well Muslim lives, Islamic law, FGM, pedophilia, beheading, etc. etc. etc which is part of Islam. I’ll bet you don’t even know what the Hadiths are. Yes, I’m proud of my country but I will be even more proud when Trump is President and we stop immigration from Muslim countries.

      Malala makes no sense at all because half her brain was removed by a bullet, courtesy of Islam.

    • Pong says

      Feb 26, 2016 at 11:13 pm

      I rarely use such words, but you are a scum. The country people live is their home. To call a country “shitty” you have to ask what have you done to make it better. America gives people an opportunity to improve their country and their own lives. Unfortunatly, there are groups, who hate the country they live in. Obama is a champion for them. BTW, he is also a baptist and a negro like yourself.

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 27, 2016 at 1:00 am

        Pong, the witless chaisson never said he was “negro”. No reason to think his ignorance has anything to do with race.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 27, 2016 at 1:22 am

      chaisson wrote:

      She makes an intelligent point that a lot of these people who are commenting don’t seem to understand. It’s one thing if you want to bad mouth a group of people because of what you seen in the media, but it would be better if you try and understand people’s lives before you judge them.
      ………………………….

      We understand the motives of violent Jihadists all too well.

      More:

      I know, I know… a lot of you people are stuck in your ways, and your beliefs are perfect, but don’t knock someone or something down because you have a different opinion.
      ………………………….

      So you are saying that we should not stand against violent JIhad terror? What, exactly, do you believe is commendable about it?

      More:

      she is right… the hatred will only lead to more violence.
      ………………………….

      So opposing the flood of violent Jihadists into our nations will only lead to ‘moderate’ Muslims becoming terrorists themselves? In that case, they were not all that ‘moderate’ to begin with…

      More:

      but you people are so proud of this shitty country we live in; where our leaders lie and cheat us everyday. where the big banks basically control everything we do , that most of you fail to understand anything different…
      ………………………….

      Hard to know which country you are referring to–the United States? Britain? This last is the country that saved Malala’s life. Yet I notice you have no criticism for any Muslim polity, including those that enslave Infidels, commit genocide of religious minorities, hang gay people, and stone rape victims to death.

      It is clear you have no admiration for democracy, freedom, and human rights, which you consider “shitty”–which is likely why you are so quick to spout this apologia for oppressive and violent Islam.

      More:

      How about you people who are sooooooooo opinionated actually do some research about Islam before you speak on Islam.
      ………………………….

      I’ve read the Qur’an (in several translations), Hadiths, Sira, The Reliance of the Traveller, a large amount of scholarly Islamic commentary from the past 1400 years, including the philosophy of Al Ghazali, and have a degree in history from the University of California.

      Many others here have studied Islam in depth–no one more so that Robert Spencer.

      It all explains quite clearly why pious Muslims would want to shoot a little schoolgirl in the head.

      More:

      And no, I’m not Islamic. I’m a Baptist living in a Republican state.
      ………………………….

      So you are an Infidel useful idiot, rather than a Taqiyya-spewing Muslim apologist. And we are supposed to be impressed by this–why, exactly?

    • IQ al Rassooli says

      Feb 27, 2016 at 3:28 am

      chaisson

      It is OBVIOUS that you live in your own SHITTY mind because you are wilfully ignoring all Facts & Reality regarding Muslims & Islam just like Malala who is betraying 750 million Muslim females by asserting her Islam the very creed that wants EDUCATED females DEAD!

      No one can turn Muslims to violence because Muslims are VIOLENT by their creed an item of simple logic that has certainly escaped your limited brain power

      Almost 98% of those writing at Jihad Watch are MORE informed about Muslims & Islam than ALL the utterly criminal leaders in the West

      I would rather talk to a donkey than an irrational creature such as you

      IQ al Rassooli
      Kafir & Proud!

    • Champ says

      Feb 27, 2016 at 4:09 am

      chaisson wrote:

      “but you people are so proud of this shitty country we live in” …

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Hey I would be more than happy to send you a one-way ticket to the middle east! So, where would you like to go? Iran? Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? Syria? You choose! I dare you to leave “this shitty country” and make mohammedans your new best friends and neighbors. Go ahead, I double-dare you.

    • Angemon says

      Feb 28, 2016 at 4:34 pm

      chaisson posted:

      “She makes an intelligent point that a lot of these people who are commenting don’t seem to understand.”

      Huh, are you deaf, blind AND dumb (not mute, unfortunately)? Are groups like ISIS, al-qaeda, Boko Haram, etc. saying “we’re doing this because people think muslims are terrorists”? No, they go “this is islam as it was practiced by the profit (salami mouthwash salami)”. That’s why it’s so appealing to muslims – because it’s divinely sanctioned.

      “It’s one thing if you want to bad mouth a group of people because of what you see in the media,”

      “Bad mouth a group of people”? Boy, you sure drunk the SJW media, didn’t you? Let me guess: you’re American and your knowledge of European history is zero.

      “but it would be better if you try and understand people’s lives before you judge them.”

      Huh? Are you saying we can’t judge people who kill others in increasingly barbaric, horrific fashion? We need to “understand” their lives? Like, for example, we need to understand why Cat Stevens called for the death of Salman Rushdie? It’s islam, stupid!

      And it’s hilarious that you’re going with that approach to defend someone who certainly didn’t try to understand Trump’s life before. you know, judging him because of what she saw in the media.

      “I know, I know… a lot of you people are stuck in your ways, and your beliefs are perfect, but don’t knock someone or something down because you have a different opinion.”

      This is not a matter of “opinions”, it’s a matter of facts.

      “she is right… the hatred will only lead to more violence.”

      Again, no. Violence comes from islamic orthodoxy. Sweden has been more than kind to muslims. What do they have to show, other than a 1400% (that’s right, fourteen hundred percent) increase in rapes?

      “but you people are so proud of this shitty country we live in”

      If you don’t have a shred of pride in your country you’re free to emigrate and renounce your citizenship.

      “where our leaders lie and cheat us everyday.”

      Right, because politicians are perfect in, let’s say, Russia…

      “where the big banks basically control everything we do ,”

      Let me guess: you were part of the #Occupy crowd, weren’t you? Did the big banks forced the people in “Occupy < insert city name here >” to trash stores, rape women and crap on police cars?

      “that most of you fail to understand anything different.”

      Good thing we have visionaries like you to show us the way – only you are smart enough to see above and beyond the ever increasingly pile of evidence that says you have no clue of what you’re talking about and understand how right you are while us, dirty peasants, just don’t get it.

      “How about you people who are sooooooooo opinionated actually do some research about Islam before you speak on Islam.”

      Lol! Most people here did. And this is, in a nutshell, the problem with leftards – the dual set of standards. Did you take your time toinvestigate what we know about islam? You didn’t, you just came in to pontificate on how we don’t know what we’re talking about.

      “And no, I’m not Islamic. I’m a Baptist living in a Republican state.”

      Not by force, ‘d wager…

    • Western Canadian says

      Mar 2, 2016 at 7:22 pm

      Your claim to be a onmuslim is laughable, in light of your repeating every pathetic lie and fraud that I have heard from lying muslims, for too many years now. Have a nice day, abdul.

    • Western Canadian says

      Mar 2, 2016 at 7:27 pm

      Your claim to be a nonmuslim is laughable, in light of your repeating every pathetic lie and fraud that I have heard from lying muslims, for too many years now. Have a nice day, abdul.

  59. Julie says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 2:44 pm

    And her donating all that money to build a “school” in Palestine that was found to be actually used to store tons of weapons for Hamas to use against Israel isnt an act “full of hate” against the Jews???? She gave the money directly to Hamas KNOWING Hamas #1 goal is the genocide of the Jews yet she wants to talk about others being “full of hate”!!! Hypocritical moslem!!

  60. Jeffrey says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 2:46 pm

    She gets shot in the head by Devout Muslims [the good Muslims] punishing her for not following the Koran as Muhammad instructed it to be followed, and now comes out telling us we need to embrace these same people and to stop being so hate filled and Islamaphobic towards them

    I hope this woman lives a long long life so that she suffers her oppressive cult every day…..Oh, that’s right, she had to run away from her homeland to…to, Oh no, to escape from the clutches of Islam…

    Now folks..that’s a classic sign of Islamaphobia if ever there was…

    And man “O” man is she getting rich from her adoring infidel fan base..The Irony of it all.

  61. sooz22 says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    Well what a saucy little girl she is! And nervy! What right does she have getting involved in American politics? None I’d say. It seems she should tend to her own knitting and focus on getting women educated instead, as that is her forte. Go back to what you know, little girl, and keep your opinions to yourself. It is the American people that will elect Donald Trump, and that is their right.

  62. anthony says

    Feb 26, 2016 at 10:02 pm

    @mp, people just like the soundbite that can support their agenda, they will speak out of the context, like this case they never mentioned Trump’s COMPLETE comment and this poor kid just played into it.She just have to learned to keep her mouth shut where she’s no expert.

  63. John says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 9:11 am

    She doesn’t know what is Islamic terrorism. Terrorism is part of Islam,

  64. Demsci says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 10:10 am

    I feel just like the majority of all commenters in reaction to Malalah’s “The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.”
    That ‘s wrong! I think in the end free speech may deliver of course such reactions as she fears, but much more good reactions directly or indirectly. Just as long as the boundary of inciting to violence is not crossed. Trying to curb free speech as hate speech is throwing away the baby with the bath water!

    Oh, what will Muslims (be able to) say after we follow such “sentiments”? Mind you, in Muslim countries and circles they very probably won’t take the same advice vice versa (so curbing their own hatespeech against Kuffars)

    Many Muslims will tell all who would listen (Muslims, liberals, neutrals, children, media) that “there is no real substantial criticism on Islam, because it is divine and perfect”, while we can show the world tons of criticism on non-Muslim manmade ideologies and political systems”. Because we “Kuffars” are notorious for criticizing each other as much or more as we criticize Islam and Muslims….

    Who are also fine Faultseekers will also abuse very much our very reticence, self-censoring and abstaining from hate-speech.

    So, NOT having statements like those of Donald Trump and other critical free speech about Islam is a lot worse than having them to our heart’s content!

  65. Johny says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 10:23 am

    Terrorism is part of Islam.

  66. Demsci says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 10:29 am

    Free speech is so very important because of it’s very effectiveness (within non-violent boundaries, and in a democratic society). And the above opinion of Malalah, and Marie Claire and such “nice people” which has also influenced the Catholic church in high circles I find absurd.

    Because I see the free speech in democratic context and just as there is criticism on Islam and Muslims there is also plenty praise and support from Kuffars for Muslims and Islam, and endless high level of tolerance.

    Also see the worldwide context of what Muslims themselves express.

    When in those 2 contexts someone ONLY focuses on the “hatespeech” of one of the 2 sides (the Kuffar side and not the Muslim-side) and then ONLY on the “hatespeech” of that (Kuffar) side, and not on the huge “love&support-speech” of that same side, why …

    that person is trying to RUIN any balance there might be between 2 different sides with both a disapproving and an approving part in their total speech-volume. A balance already heavily disrupted by censorship in Islamic countries!).

    To be more fair; Malalah at the very least should exhort her own side to curb their own hatespeech (which is undeniable). But no, she unconsciously discriminates her own side with the discrimination of lower expectations.

    And to be more fair also, Malalah (and her “cheerleaders”) should also have mentioned the completely COUNTLESS profound helpers, supporters, tolerating Kuffar politicians everywhere all the time. Which from her standpoint she should appreciate. But no, all she does is put down the perceived negative side of the Kuffar politicians! Yes, she is still full of prejudice, I think.

    This double one-sided negative exhortation I find absurd and very egoistic for her own side.

  67. Rumple Stiltskin says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    *****Westerners DON’T MAKE MOSLEMS TERRORISTS **MOHAMMAD DOES!**
    Anything else is a LIE*****
    We Are NOT CREATING TERRORISTS, the ISLAMIC DOCTRINE IS!
    MOHAMMAD was a JEW before he CREATED ISLAM &
    *1.MOHAMMAD was the FIRST TERRORIST & it is EVERY MOSLEMS DUTY TO LIVE **EXACTLY AS MOHAMMAD DID**, that Means it’s their DUTY TO BE TERRORISTS, but this is
    *2.Another ISLAMIC DECEPTION, as MOHAMMAD SAID “WAR IS DECEPTION”, then
    *3.the 3RD & 4TH RULES OF JIHAD say ALWAYS PLAY VICTIMS By TWISTING the Situation Around to PLAY VICTIMS until the VICTIM EXCEPTS TH BLAME & Turns their HATRED ON THEMSELVES so they can’t FIGHT BACK.
    *4.Which came FIRST THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? what I say TODAY Created 1400 YEARS OF JIHAD BEFORE I WAS BORN, yes that Make SENSE!
    She is NOT STUPID, she is saying EXACTLY WHAT the ISLAMIC DOCTRINE DEMANDS TO USE DECEPTION AS A BATTLE TACTIC (including OUR OWN IGNORANCE OF ISLAM in Al-Jahiliyyah -Age of IGNORANCE) just because some MIGHT APPEAR MORE PEACEFUL THATS A DECEPTION, there is NO SUCH THING AS A MODERATE MOSLEM they ALL BELIEVE & OBEY ALL ISLAMIC VERSES, the PEACEFUL VERSES ONLY APPLY TO OTHER MOSLEMS & HAVE BEEN SUPERSEED BY THE LATER VIOLENT VERSES & Only Serve To DECEIVE NON MOSLEMS – WAR IS DECEPTION (MOHAMMAD) & …..
    Anybody Disagrees with ISLAM IS TO BE KILLED,
    Anybody Who Resists ISLAM IS TO BE KILLED,
    Anybody Who Doesn’t Embrace ISLAM IS TO BE KILLED,
    Anybody Who Doesn’t Believe in ALLAH IS TO BE KILLED,
    Even MOSLEMS Who Aren’t Violent Enough Are TO BE KILLED
    So MOSLEMS Can’t be FRIENDS WITH NON-MUSLIMS
    They are ORDERED TO LIE
    They are ORDERED TO KILL
    They are ORDERED TO COMMIT JIHAD
    They are ORDERED TO PLAY VICTIMS
    They are ORDERED TO NEVER OBEY OUR LAWS ONLY SHARÍAH LAW
    They are ORDERED TO TERRORIZE
    They are ORDERED TO OVER-THROW THE NATIONS THROUGH IMMIGRATION
    They are ORDERED TO FORCE SHARÍAH UPON ALL CITIZENS
    They are ORDERED TO ENSLAVE & RAPE THE WOMEN
    They are ORDERED MAKE WAR WITH KAFFIR (Non-Muslims)
    These & More are NOT OPTIONS But are (FARD) **COMPULSORY For ALL MOSLEMS**
    *****Westerners DON’T MAKE MOSLEMS TERRORISTS **MOHAMMAD DOES!**
    Anything else is a LIE*****

    • Pong says

      Feb 27, 2016 at 12:29 pm

      “MOHAMMAD was a JEW before he CREATED ISLAM”
      That is something novel. I thought that Robert has an exceptional knowledge of islam, but not knowing such fact about Mohammed obviously puts him a step below Rumple Stiltskin whos knowledge of islam seems to be superior.
      Or is it an old proof of my dog being a cat (cats have 4 legs, my dog has 4 legs, therefore my dog is a cat)? Jews are bad, Mohamed was bad, therefore Mohammed was a jew.

      • Diana says

        Feb 27, 2016 at 11:56 pm

        No, Muhammad was not a Jew. His ancestry is known for several generations, and it does not include any Jews. Nor did he ever convert.

        This is one of the fables that occasionally resurfaces on the less intelligent sites about Islam. It seems to have mushroomed up from the fact that his great-grandmother, Salma bint Amr, lived in Medina, a city that was about 40% Jewish.

        Salma was not a Jew. On the contrary, she seems to have been a polyandrist, which was definitely not acceptable to any Jewish culture in history.

        • Pong says

          Feb 28, 2016 at 1:03 am

          “No, Muhammad was not a Jew. His ancestry is known for several generations, and it does not include any Jews. Nor did he ever convert.
          This is one of the fables that occasionally resurfaces on the less intelligent sites about Islam.”
          Well, thanks to Rumple Stitskin, this fable resurfaced on JW.

    • Champ says

      Feb 28, 2016 at 1:35 am

      Why are you yelling?

  68. Daniel Triplett says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 12:08 pm

    I love Trump more and more every day.

  69. Zigg says

    Feb 27, 2016 at 9:10 pm

    Muslims don’t belong in the West, and there are already too many here

  70. dr andrew michael says

    Mar 20, 2016 at 4:41 am

    This is the same girl who criticised how western women dress and that western music is evil.
    She pontificates and is self-righteous. Some people here in the UK say she is the next Mother Theresa, I don’t think so, Mother Theresa lived amongst the impoverished and destitute in Calcutta, Malalalala lives in luxury surrounded by security. It sickeneing

  71. John Thomas says

    Mar 20, 2016 at 5:18 am

    Hmm ? What price is Paddy Power making on her getting a knighthood or even a Peerage?

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • iconoclast123 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Brando on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Boycott Turkey on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.