• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Netherlands: Man arrested for wearing pig hat

Feb 22, 2016 10:07 am By Robert Spencer

No Muslims were even around. Apparently just the idea that one might have seen the hat and become offended was enough for the Netherlands’ Sharia police to arrest this man. And why would any Muslim have become offended, anyway? Do the Dutch police think that Islam forbids not only pork, but the wearing of pig hats?

Of course, the Dutch police were thinking that the pig hat meant, “I hate Muslims.” It may have meant that. Even if it did, is that a crime in the Netherlands now to be obnoxious? Or it may have meant that the person wearing it simply opposed the deluge of Muslim migrants entering the Netherlands. Or it may have simply been a silly hat. The arrest shows how afraid the Dutch authorities are of Muslims, and how determined they are to appease them: they will do what they think pleases them when they aren’t even around.

If this kind of thing can happen there now, imagine what the Netherlands will be like in five or ten years. Stoning and amputations in public squares?

Video thanks to Vlad.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Netherlands Tagged With: pig hat


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Charli Main says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:13 am

    Just the prelude to arresting anyone wearing a cross in public. The open wearing of a cross in the British workplace is already effectively banned for fear of upsetting and offending minorities. For minorities read Muslims.

    • David Scoltock says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 10:43 am

      The cross represents allot of hate to allot of cultures, not just the muslims.

      • ainu888 says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 10:56 am

        Welcome brother David, or shall I saw Dawood! Nice to see you again. Said your namaz three times already today?

        • Bindon Blood says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 6:44 pm

          He is totally ignorant of Christianity and is confusing medieval politics with the Gospels. As for the inquisition; it was a fanatical set up but by and large the idea was not to execute people but to correct error in doctrine. There was also a suspicion that Jews who had converted were not actually sincere and were in fact working against the Christian faith. Some might have been but it was an old prejudice coming back again to torment the Jews. There was a fear of an Muslim upsurge again too which made the state ,and the church ,very nervous. After the people suffering so long under Muslim rule the Christian kings wanted the ideology rooted out. The Jews suffered under Islam too,very much at certain times although at some periods Jews were allowed to occupy fairly high office. This went against them and they got ill feeling from Muslims and Christians ; Muslims because they saw it as Jews ” getting above themselves” ,in the laws of Islam no infidel can be in a position of authority over a Muslim, the Christians saw it as being in league with the Muslim oppressor.
          Our friend Dave seems to have got his ideas of the inquisition from Black Adder,or the Hammer House Of Horror. And the reason Christians can eat pork is because t was revealed to Peter that no food is unclean and God does not despise anything He has made. The food goes into the body and passes out ,what makes people “unclean” comes form within people,not from without. This is the message of the Gospel.

      • Pere LaChaise says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 10:57 am

        David, please explain. What do you mean by ‘represents allot of hate’?
        The image of the Cross is of Christ crucified out of love for humanity. How does that ‘represent allot of hate’?

        • ainu888 says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 11:00 am

          Take it easy Pere. David is a self loathing European. He wishes to be wiped out.

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 11:25 am

          Look at European history and christianity, the purges, inquisitions, the mass death and destruction along with the repression of scientific advancement. Entire cultures where wiped out by aggressive christian colonisation and expansion.

          Those of us in Europe who are not christian (or muslim for that matter) find this hard to forgive and are VERY wary of christians. If they did it once, they will do it again.

          islam is currently the biggest threat to western culture at present, a threat to our rights, liberties and religous freedoms. However there are many fundie christians who would strip us of our freedoms in the name of their own god if they could.

          christians are the enemy of our enemy when it comes to islamic expansion, but we are not stupid enough to make the mistake of thinking they are our friends.

        • Tom W Harris says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 6:14 pm

          Newsflash, Dave: Ever hear of the Reformation?

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 2:46 pm

          The cross doesn’t mean the same thing to all Christians…no matter how well intentioned.

          But what is the real history and meaning behind this religious symbol? Did Jesus Christ, the Apostles, or the original New Testament Church adore the cross as “a worthy symbol to inspire and protect them?” Should you?

          The story of the cross as a religious symbol begins in ancient Babylon. Upon Nimrod’s death, his wife Semiramis exalted her infant son, Tammuz, as Nimrod re-born. God-king worship became quickly entrenched among the ancient Babylonians…and the Tau symbol – the first character of Tammuz’ name became a key symbol in Babylonian worship. It is historically indisputable that the Tau was an integral part of pagan religious worship in pre-Christian culture. The cross was sewn into pagan priests’ costumes, worn by vestal virgins, and adorned pagan temples. (See, Alexander Hislop’s: The Two Babylons and The Catholic Encyclopedia, “The Cross and Crucifix,” page 517, 1913 edition). The Tau took various forms such as Τ and ϯ and would sometimes incorporate a circle representing the sun – an integral part of the Babylonian Mystery Religion. After death, Nimrod was worshipped under various names including Marduk, Bel, Baal and Beelzebub. Baal-worship, a continuation of Babylonian religion, was what God rebuked ancient Israel for when they “did evil in the sight of the LORD. They forgot the LORD their God, and served the Baals and Asherahs” (Judges 3:7). It was in service to this pagan deity that ancient Israel sacrificed their infant children as burning sacrifices (Jeremiah 32:35). Baal worship was a terrible abomination in God’s sight. But Nimrod worship spread throughout the ancient world. Nimrod-reborn as Tammuz was associated with the Tau symbol in the pre-Christian, pagan worship of the ancient Babylonians, Orientals, Philistines, Egyptians. It crept into what became the Roman Catholic Church and then was adopted by the various Protestant denominations. The pagan Tau now adorns most church buildings and priestly costumes – just as it did in the ancient, pagan world! But it never adorned Christ, the Apostles or the membership of the original New Testament Church. To argue that this heathen symbol “is now OK to use and honor because the meaning now points to Christ,” is not only to ignore that Jesus Christ and the Apostles and the original New Testament Church never worshipped or revered the cross (they saw it for what it was – a pagan symbol and a cruel instrument of death), but is also to ignore the words of Jeremiah the prophet – “Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen” (Jeremiah 10:2, KJV).

          While human memory is short, and most simply do not understand the pagan history of the cross, the Almighty God does remember where the symbol came from! He remembers the cry of burning infants sacrificed to Baal (Ezekiel 16:20&21)! He remembers the cruel instrument of crucifixion upon which
          so very many died, even including His Son.

        • satie says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 5:42 pm

          Pere…. don’t waste your breath, Honey. He’s an idiot and he can’t spell. You, on the other hand, gave a beautiful response. God bless you.

      • Mo says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 11:02 am

        @ David Scoltock

        “The cross represents allot of hate to allot of cultures, not just the muslims.”

        First of all, get yourself a dictionary and learn the difference between “allot” and “a lot”. Second, learn how to capitalize proper nouns.

        But most important, what “hate” is the cross representing?

        (You know you won’t answer me.)

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 11:26 am

          Study European history sometime and what christianity did. The inquisition would be a good start

        • Angemon says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 3:29 pm

          David Scoltock posted:

          “Study European history sometime and what christianity did.”

          It made warring, barbarous tribes into civilized people who shaped the world as it is today. It served as the glue that held together different cultures to resist centuries of islamic invasions.

          “The inquisition would be a good start”

          The inquisition was concerned with Christian heretics. It answered to the Crown – if the Crown stated that Judaism or islam were allowed to be practiced in a nation, they were out of the scope of the Inquisition.

        • Jay Boo says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:02 pm

          The inquisition was an over-reaction based on fear of repeated invasions by barbaric Muslims and their opportunistic traitor allies posing as Christians and Jews.
          After the inquisitions by 1492 the stench of Islam was removed from Spain.

        • Panmelia says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:05 pm

          David Scoltock: What ARE are you rambling about? ” … very wary of Christians. If they did it once they’ll do it again.” Those days are in the PAST!

          Are you unaware of the Reformation, the Counter-Reformation, the splitting of the Protestants into countless different churches, the effect of scientific discoveries on religious belief in Western countries, the proven science of evolution thanks to Darwin’s writings and the consequent reduction in churchgoing, Christian faith and Christian influence? Are you unaware that the Christian religion lost its power over the population long ago and no one would vote for a government that wanted to aggressively colonise, expand, and wipe out other cultures in the name of Christianity!

          The UK, for instance, is a secular country where the majority are not churchgoing Christians. Their values are informed by Christianity, no doubt: treat others as you would want them to treat you, for example. Yes, there are fundamentalist Christians in the USA, but they’re a laughing stock and no threat to Europe.

          The people of religion you need to keep an eye on are the muslims. Islam has never been reformed or challenged or modified from within and the idiots still believe in every word psycho Mo said he got from allah 1400 years ago. Be glad that the European Christians prevented the muslims from invading or taking control of the Continent centuries ago: you’d either be a muslim or a dhimmi by now, as would I.

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:11 pm

          So mass murder, torture and anti-semetism can be just written off as an over-reaction?

          The inquisition had nothing to do with the reconquista, it was an outgrowth of the infamous domine caines, as the Dominicans became known. A VERY unpleaseant, ultra-extremist sect of christianity.

          What of the persecution of the cathar heresy and the brutal subjugations in the south of fance? Actions that had nothing to do with islam.

          Or the teutonic crusade in the east that engaged in wholesale genocide?

          We have a long history of religous-based persecution and genocide in Europe. My own nation saw centuries of bloodshed as christians decided to kill in the name of their god. Queen mary burned protestants alive, screaming and begging for death as they burned. Cromwell persecuted the catholics in ireland.

          This history is the reason for the modern British view that accepts religions, provided they accept our culture. We have Sikhs, Hindhus, Jews, Pagans and Bhuddists living in peace and protected by our laws. We just need to stop islam from abusing those laws.

        • Jay Boo says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:14 pm

          No comparison — David

          A “good” Qur’an following Muslim is instructed to kill to make MO’s sock-puppet Allah greater.

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:17 pm

          Panmelia, past my arse!

          I’ve watched the growth of right wing, christian movements in America with great alarm. Bigots and fanatics that want to ban evolution from the science class and replace it with their so-called “inteligent design”.

          Their movements set to bar women from the right to make their own choice in regards to their bodies, attempts to ban gay couples from having the same rights to marry as straight ones. All actions that would meet with much approval by isis.

          You see their bigoted, neo-crusading zealotry on this very blog. Masquerading behind anti-islamic feeling but sharing views little different and just as intolerant and unacceptable by modern society.

          I think you’d find more support amongst the so called “liberal left” if these bigots where not so attached to the legitimate movement to heighten awareness of the islamic threat.

        • Jay Boo says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:29 pm

          Muslims in Atheist clothing

          David
          Go to any so called Atheist website to find the same one sided view of Christianity with either no criticism Islam or mealy mouth dhimmitude style proselyting of what Muslims believe posing as criticism.

        • Jay Boo says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 1:02 pm

          David
          “Study European history sometime and what Christianity did. ”

          Hallelujah – Choir of King’s College, Cambridge live performance of Handel’s Messiah

        • Kublai Khan says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 2:13 pm

          David:

          ” not a few years late like the yanks ”

          So the muslims who were part of the BC get browine points for serving their country ahead of the ‘yanks’. How bout when the ‘yanks’ and ‘rebs’ and everybody else saved your asses from a nation your commonwealth had hugely outnumbered?

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 7:27 pm

          Beautiful, Jay Boo!

      • CogitoErgoSum says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 12:13 pm

        David, how dreadful it must be for you whenever you visit a cemetery for World War II veterans and you see all those white crosses making the graves …. and your mind goes immediately to the times of the Inquisition. What a ghastly experience that must be for you. I’ll be you it just makes you want to pass out from revulsion. I’ve heard that the sign of the cross has that effect on certain people.

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:23 pm

          That’s the problem with you people, you have no understanding of how non-christians think.

          I respect the lads (and lasses) who fought in both world wars, brave and good soldiers who did their duty. My nation owes them a great debt and it’s not just the christian soldiers, visit our war memorials and you will see Sikh ad Hindhu graves, even graves marked with the crescent of islam, soldiers from the Empire who came to our aid when we called (not a few years late like the yanks).

          I have no problem with “moderate” christians, so long as they keep their faith to themselves and don’t try to preach all the time or try that stupid emotional blackmail “worship my god or you’ll burn in hell” crap.

          It’s the fundies who will not accept their religion’s brutal past, who are just as bad as the muslims under the skin. Seething, hate-filled bigots who would enforce christian rules on my nation and my children. Idiots who would replace evolution in the science class with their religous doctrine of inteligent design.

        • CogitoErgoSum says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:34 pm

          As I said, living in a land where you might accidentally see a cross somewhere must be dreadful for you and you have my sympathy. And as you said, my simple mind can’t grasp the way a non-Christian thinks. Yes, you have convince me, my greatest problem is that I’m awfully stupid and not smart like non-Christians.

        • Karen says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 2:51 pm

          ” have no problem with “moderate” christians, so long as they keep their faith to themselves ……”

          David, with respect, I’d say a lot of people see Evolution the same way you view faith; one group’s beloved pet theory, impossible to subject to the scientific method and prove, with legions of guardians and gatekeepers unwilling to consider competing theories and evidence, much less discard it for a better theory. And yet it is taught as settled fact to school children everywhere, with no disclaimers, like it or not. These guardians even reject the innovative and neutral ideas behind Intelligent Design, while clinging to the tenuous and crumbling claims of Evolution.

          So, when you talk about Christians imposing their beliefs on you, please remember the tyranny of the other side too.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 6:06 pm

          David Scoltock wrote:

          …even graves marked with the crescent of islam, soldiers from the Empire who came to our aid when we called (not a few years late like the yanks)…

          It’s the fundies who will not accept their religion’s brutal past, who are just as bad as the muslims under the skin…
          ……………………………

          Muslims are better and more committed to fighting totalitarianism than are Americans, and Christian fundamentalists are as bad as ravening Jihadists…OK…

          The fact is that Muslim troops in Europe were notorious for raping women–a part of the brutal past David Scoltock would apparently like *us* to forget.

          The Sophia Loren film “Two Women” deals with these atrocities. There is even a word for it in Italian–“Marocchinate”. To be “given the Moroccan treatment” mean to be raped by Muslims.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 6:21 pm

          David Scoltock says:

          “the proven science of evolution thanks to Darwin’s writings”

          “Idiots who would replace evolution in the science class with their religous doctrine of inteligent design”

          You choose Evolution…Others choose Religion…lighten-up man.

          My Degrees are in Science…I appreciate True Science…

          Evolution cheats True Science…it offers something it can not deliver…
          And if I choose God over Science it is not to discredit science…It is because…
          I have followed facts to their logical conclusion…I do not believe in God for no reason…
          God exists…A Master Scientist…among many other Powerful Attributes…
          A Well Rounded Being Beyond just science.

          Even Darwin admitted that complex organs such as the eye would be difficult to explain in terms of the gradual stepwise process outlined by his theory…But Darwin did not realize the complexity of vision’s molecular biology…which science would later discover…If we find design in the universe…we naturally expect a designer…Significantly…then…we may ask…was the universe designed for a purpose…As Patrick Glynn notes in his book, God: The Evidence: “The most basic explanation for the universe is that it seems to be a process orchestrated to achieve the end or goal of creating human beings” (Glynn, p. 32). Glynn states further: “From the scientist’s viewpoint, the fact that the universe looks as though it had a definite beginning might be upsetting enough. But what appears to drive cosmologists nearly to distraction is the anthropic principle”—that the earth and the universe were created for mankind (ibid., p. 42).

          What is the alternative…Certainly one may ignore evidence of design behind the laws that govern the universe…and behind the universe itself…But in the face of so much evidence…it takes greater “faith” to believe in a godless universe than to follow the evidence to its logical conclusion…the existence of a Creator God who set in place His laws for a purpose…Why would people exercise so much “faith” to ignore the evidence right in front of their eyes…Even some atheists and agnostics admit that by choosing to remain ignorant…they can continue living their lives without God…denying the consequences. Aldous Huxley…the famous English author…expressed this perspective well: “Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don’t know because we don’t want to know. It is our will that decides how and upon what subjects we shall use our intelligence. Those who detect no meaning in the world generally do so because, for one reason or another, it suits their books that the world should be meaningless” (Ends and Means, p. 312).

          What an admission…Huxley’s statement sounds very much like what the Apostle Paul wrote: “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened” (Romans 1:20–21). You can be like these people…or You can examine the universe…creation and the purpose of human life…and you will find that design demands a designer.

          There is so much more to this than I am able to write here…I just wanted to demonstrate somehow that a Religious Human is more than Gullible…I demand proof…I feed on real…I follow the facts of science…I am thankful for God…because He reveals Himself to those that seek Him…His truth is logical.

      • Wellington says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 1:28 pm

        The Christian theological blueprint, David Scotlock, does not contain any prescription for the crushing of liberty or the denial of equality under the law, contra the Islamic theological blueprint which insures a huge dearth of freedom and insists that non-Muslims in this world acknowledge the superiority of Muslims with all kinds of liabilities placed upon non-Muslims (e.g., Muslims can preach their faith to non-Muslims but not the other way around; permission must be obtained not only to build non-Muslim houses of worship but even for repairing existing ones). In short, wherever Islam dominates it sets up a Jim Crow system based not on race but on belief.

        When Christians behaved badly in the name of their faith centuries ago, it was in violation of Christian tenets and not in fulfillment of them, and again contra Muslims who are required by their religion to wage war upon the unbeliever “until all religion is with Allah.” {Sura 8:39} Also, the Koran is always prescriptive while the Bible is often only descriptive. Let’s face it, Orthodox rabbis stoning adulteresses to death nowadays are pretty scarce, no?

        I am not religious in the least but were every Muslim in Europe to wake up tomorrow a devout Christian Europe would be infinitely better off. And I would add that that the secularist, progressive, non-Christian agenda adhered to by so many Western Europeans has led to an emptiness, a soullessness, in the lives of so many in Europe today. As Voltaire, himself a skeptic, observed, if God doesn’t exist we’ll have to invent Him. At the very least, you have to know that Christianity is not a totalitarian ideology while Islam certainly is. Yes, I hope you know at least this much.

        • Karen says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 3:04 pm

          Superbly written, Wellington.

        • Westman says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 4:24 pm

          Well written Wellington.

          David may not realize that the fastest growing ideology in the World is not Islam or Christianity, it’s Secularism that places religion into a secondary role in civic affairs. In this context, David should realize that he is in no danger from Christianity. The Christian Right was unable to elect a POTUS which shows conclusively that it is in decline, though far behind the secularization of Europe. And those abortion clinic demonstrations in Europe, where are they?

          I find nothing wrong with the general tenants of Christianity which unlike Islam does not desire the genocide of Jews. I’m only saying the obvious, that no religion is growing faster than secularism.

        • Wellington says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 5:33 pm

          Thank you, Karen. Thank you, Westman.

          Perhaps David Scotllock should consider all the genocides perpetrated by people with no religion before he fully castigates Christians. Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin and Hitler, among others who had contempt for religion in general, engaged in genocides that dwarf what Christians acting badly did. As Dostoyevsky reputedly said, without God anything is possible. Of course, the exception here to what this great Russian observed, I would contend, is Allah. Better no religion than Islam but the exception again proves the rule.

          While I think an individual who is not religious can lead a fulfilled and ethical life, I also believe it best that a society as a whole be guided by religious belief, an enlightened religious belief, and the two most enlightened religions of all are Judaism and Christianity because they place such an emphasis on the dignity and worth of the individual and thus work quite well with democratic tenets.

          As for Scotlock’s contempt for fundamentalist Christians, yes, they can be a bit goofy at times but they don’t want to kill you for disagreeing with them and any faults they have pale, extremely pale, in comparison to those of mucho amounts of Muslims who follow the dictates of their warped founder, the Profiteer Mohammed.

        • TheBuffster says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 8:14 am

          Another “Well said!” from me -an atheist- Wellington. I think you have things in good perspective in both of your posts.

          But I do disagree that “without God anything is possible”, though.

          Without a love for one’s own life and health and prosperity and happiness, anything is possible (with “anything” meaning any bizarre, destructive, nihilistic beliefs and actions, like Dostoyevsky’s villain in “Crime and Punishment”). Without grasping that achieving and maintaining life, health, prosperity, and happiness necessarily requires certain virtues, anything is possible. If a person doesn’t care what happens to himself and doesn’t care about self respect, he can do any old thing and he *will* ruin his life and become a menace to others. Or if he wants happiness, but doesn’t bother to plug in his brain and work out what virtues he needs to develop to earn it, he’ll also ruin his life and become – if not a menace, at best a pain in the butt to the people who *have* plugged in their brains.

          Those who want happiness and understand the need for and purpose of objective virtues and *individual liberty* – whether those people are religious or not – aren’t going to become threats to their fellow man. They won’t set up totalitarian schemes. They won’t violate their neighbors’ rights, won’t steal or murder or rape or vandalize or do other rotten things to people.

          The problem people are the ones who have *no* values, or whose values have been chosen by some means other than a conscientious, reasoned effort to discover what kind of character actual happiness requires.

        • Carolyne says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 11:26 am

          I am an atheist and do not believe in religion of any kind. It is true that centuries ago the Christians were repressive and many were killed because of it. However, that was centuries ago. One of the redeeming qualities of Christianity is that it can change. And it has. I can’t recall a single incident where a church-sponsored killing occurred in my lifetime or indeed in the last few hundred years. Islam. on the other hand has not changed since the Seventh Century and as long as it exists, it never will. I’ll throw in my lot with the Christians if it comes to that.

          As long as I am left alone to believe what I wish, I will do the same. Islam’s philosophy is different. It must control every action, every thought, every diet and every woman. And will do so with violence and death.

          I guess Dave can’t see the difference.

        • Keys says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 1:21 pm

          Thank you, Wellington.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 3:58 pm

          In Reply To:
          Wellington says
          February 22, 2016 at 5:33 pm

          Wellington You as Usual Say Things Like it Is…Thank You Sir…You Don’t Let Em Play.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 5:51 pm

          Reply To:
          Karen says
          February 22, 2016 at 2:51 pm

          Thank You Karen Very Well Satated and True.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 7:29 pm

          Good posts from Wellington and the Buffster, among others.

        • Karen says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 9:49 pm

          Thank you Mark Swan!

      • Beagle says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 pm

        Purges were a Communist phenomenon, particularly by Stalin. Try to keep your facts straight.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 5:45 pm

          Reply To:
          David Scoltock says
          February 22, 2016 at 3:12 pm

          “I’m just not so naieve as to ignore the rise of the christian right using this situation to worm their way in.”

          How about the Christian Left…The Christian In-between…How about the Non-Christians…Can’t everyone Worm in Just like You.

          We need everyone who is sane enough to help here…no one took a poopoo and left anyone in charge…Ok.

      • Mirren10 says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 5:04 pm

        Scoltock, this thread is about a brave Dutch man **arrested by police** for refusing to remove a pig hat. It is *not* about your anti-Christian manias, which no-one wants to hear about.

        So, what have you got to say about *this story* ?

        • Charli Main says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 3:07 am

          Do you remember the fairly recent story about a young mum, who got thrown off a bus at night because she was singing the Peppa Pig song to calm her baby ?????
          Some Pakis claimed she was” offending” them and the arse wipe bus driver forced them off the bus instead for telling the Pakis ” if your offended, your free to get off the bus ”
          We have just as many Muslim arse kissers as the Dutch have.

      • Peggy says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 6:09 pm

        Really?
        Can you tell us which cultures besides Muslim hate the cross?

      • Maggie says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 9:52 pm

        @David Scoltock

        “The cross represents allot of hate to allot of cultures, not just the muslims.”
        Are you serious? Really? If you stop and think about it there is stuff in every religion that represents a lot of hat towards different cultures, not just the cross. This is the classical example of double standards.
        If muslim women can work with a hijab, why can’t christians carry a cross on the work place? There should be equality for all, and that is not what is happening today. Either all people should be allowed to represent their religion in the way they see fit, or no-one should be able to do so.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 5:15 pm

          ONE PEOPLE ONE LAW…I agree Maggie.

        • Atheist kaffur says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 8:57 pm

          If you work for the public sector I don’t want to know your religion.

      • Mick Ronson of Australia says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 5:04 am

        You’re not a pig hat, mate, you’re a bumhat.

        • Carolyne says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 11:28 am

          Actually, he’s a pig’s rear.

      • RonCo215 says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 12:30 pm

        That’s bait and switch!! Only muslims are murdering people in the name of a religion, as they have been doing non stop for 1400 years. Trying to make light of that fact by bringing in the behavior of any other religion is just a way to ignore the brutal facts about islam!!!

      • DFD says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 4:46 pm

        What a pathetic hate crazed little liar!

        The inquisition? No doubt, you mean the Spanish one. The inquisition was brought to an end by Christian cavalry and infantry from Britain and France. In its entire 350 year history it has killed, tortured and maimed less people than the Muslims in the last ten years.

        Scientific advancements? Galileo was a Christian, Kepler, Copernicus, Gutenberg etc. Including Isaac Newton (Arian Christian), Prof. Heisenberg (Quntum physics), Werner von Braun, never mind what the shitty press proclaims. Check it out *boy*. Draw timelines, locations and people: Christianity brought Scientific advancements and freedom. On a occasion it went funny, on one occasion church mice were tried in court if they had the right to steal from donated food. The ruling was yes, they too are God’s creatures.

        AM I PROUD TO BE THE DESCENDANT OF THIS CULTURE AND ITS UNDERLYING ROMAN CIVILIZATION! I HAVE GIVEN UP ON DENOMINATION, BUT I WEAR MY CROSS WITH PRIDE!

        Aggressive colonization? Never heard of a non-aggressive one, by whomever, on this planet.

        Inquisition? We probably need a new one to sniff out the Muslims, convert them — and their sympathizers too.

        I didn’t say that to justify, not even to express utter contempt and loathing.

        But TRIUMPH! And it will not be taken from us. Suck rocks and rage.

        Hard times ahead for us, so what, it’s not the first time. But we will continue to be victorious. I am sure you will understand that, after all we belong to Jesus Christ.

        Does that mean we should forgive you? No, not necessary. After there’s nothing to forgive to a feeble minded, emotionally disturbed one.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 5:12 pm

          reply to:

          DFD says
          February 23, 2016 at 4:46 pm

          Absolutely I Agree…Good To hear You Commenting…I wanted to ask a while back…What is a Anglo/German?

          Mark

        • DFD says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 6:45 am

          To Mark Swan

          I gather you are not a European, so, before the fun, a basic answer:

          Anglo-German means half English half German. In common language. Actually in reality it would mean German – German, because the the Angle region is part of northern Germany, just below the Danish border.

          Now, let’s have a LAUGH:

          Problem’s human language. Let me put it this way: Anglo-Saxon *should* mean German-German, for as I said, Angle or Anglo is in northern Germany. Saxony, there are several of them in Germany, the Capital of Saxony proper (that is the Sachsen/Saxons) is Dresden. Now, the/we English are often referred to as Anglo-Saxon, but that is wrong, because as English we are half French. So, should we be referred to as Franco-Saxons or Franco-Germans? Don’t say that to an Englishman – unless you’ve got insurance or back-up. Apart from that, it would be ultimately be wrong as well, since we/the English are Norman/Sachsen/Angles – with a bit of Celtic & Pict leftover. The Normans of course were Vikings gone native, like the Frisians in Germany. So, should we/the English properly called Norma-Saxons, or perhaps Anglo-Norma-Saxons?

          But that could be offensive those with strong Galic/Celtic roots and relations, like the northern Irish English. It most certainly would drive our Scottish (Scot is Latin, in English it means: Raider) cousins up the… yep: Hadrians Wall!

          If you think this is it, Hah! We Europeans have a lot more like this 🙂

          Well, I hope I answered the basics in an enjoyable form

      • Chabuco says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 7:00 pm

        Islam is the most bigoted, intolerant and hateful ideology on earth. Everywhere it has come in contact with other cultures -via the sword, imperialism and conquests- there has been ‘trouble’, to put it lightly, with the local subjugated, enslaved people and cultures. From Mauritania to Philippines, from Tanzania to Xinjiang, from India, to the Caucasus, the Balkans and beyond. Anything else is just projection, deflection and historic revisionism. All pathological in non-functional sociopaths like you.

        Keep trying to divert attention away from your comrades exterminating non-Muslims 24/7, 365 by projecting Islam’s intrinsic bigotry, intolerance and hatred onto other cultures and people. Keep it up like that, but try harder next time you sick fuck!

      • Abu Binat says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 11:14 pm

        David you are a spineless coward and an appeaser. Go join your buddies in Pakistan. See how they welcome and sign up up for free MoHomomidCare… These cops are worthless thugs,

    • mortimer says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 11:56 am

      Were does the law say that everyone…or even Muslims…have a RIGHT NEVER TO BE OFFENDED?

      Pigs and pork are as much a part of Dutch culture as windmills and wooden shoes.

      This is a sinister attack on Dutchness. This is a declaration of war against the Dutch people themselves.

      The Nazis tried that…Muslims are the new Nazis.

      • David Scoltock says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 am

        It’s a good point, Danish bacon is the best in the world and a VITAL part of a good, messy egg and bacon banjo

        • dom107 says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 1:06 pm

          Why do Muslims and Jews pick on the poor pig? .Apart from being a fairly intelligent animal it is absolutely delicious to eat .Almost all of it is eatable but my favourite is gammon with chips and peas. I lick the plate clean when nobody is looking.!
          I did once ask a muslim guy ( a tame one) why he didn’t like the pig and he said it was a dirty animal which was not very logical as all animals(including ourselves) are dirty until washed .Mohammed himself ate a sheep which was poisoned by a jewish lady whose family he wiped out and took her on as another wife (she must have been a “looker”)
          She returned the favour with a pork free dinner. All in the life of peaceful religious people eh !!!!
          He took a long time to get to those 72 virgins .I bet none of them were jewish(once bitten eh!!)
          Does anyone know if there is any scriptural reason for this I know in the Christian gospels Jesus was suppose to have cast out demons from a man into a herd of swine which promptly divided over a cliff to there death. Not the swines fault I’d say.!!!
          Now are they all copying each other with this downer on pigs or what?????

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 pm

          dom107

          Back in the day, in the region that gave rise to Judaism, cooking techniques where primitive and often involved the use of hot stones to heat meat. You’d leave it out in the sun to cure.

          Now this is a healthy way to eat some meats such as goat or cattle but if you do that with pork or chicken and you’ll have a bad case of food poisoning. So rules where set in place about which foods could be eaten and they eventualy became religous rules.

          In Europe, a much colder climate, we cooked food using open fires which is means pork is not poisonous. Therefore our culture did not evolve religous restrictions to such foods. When christians took over europe, they adopted local customs and culture to better assimilate the religion. Which is why the word hell is used to describe lucifer’s lair, Hel was a Nordic/Germanic goddess of the underworld.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 6:19 pm

          dom107 wrote:

          Why do Muslims and Jews pick on the poor pig?
          …………………..

          dom, observant Jews don’t eat pork, but they don’t become unhinged by the mention of pigs, nor are they trying to impose their dietary habits on anyone else. Some examples:

          “Spain: Prosecutor throws out complaint from Muslim family that denounced teacher for talking about ham in class”

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/spain-prosecutor-throws-out-complaint-from-muslim-family-that-denounced-teacher-for-talking-about-ha

          In the above, this was just a lecture about agriculture in a region of Spain famous for its ham. This is just part of history. No Jew would have a problem with this.

          “Federal Bureau of Prisons cuts pork from its menu”

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/federal-bureau-of-prisons-cuts-pork-from-its-menu

          In the above, pork is banned *for everyone*–in this case, mostly Infidels. Jews would never demand that Gentiles not be allowed to eat things that are non-Kosher.

        • Natalie says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 11:10 pm

          Wanting to reply to the questions about Jews and Pork bu there is no reply button after the post. In the Jewish Torah there are very clear guidelines as to what constitutes a kosher animal and what does not. this relates to fish, birds and animals. The two animals expressly forbidden are the pig and the hyena as they eat their own fecal matter. Islam took this up as Mohammed was originally from Medina which was originally a Jewish city and grew up surrounded by people practicing the Jewish faith. When he developed his cult he based it on what he was familiar with and then distorted these things to accommodate his and his followers psychopathic hate. Then he massacred the Jews of Medina. Observant Jews do not eat Pork, but you will never see them telling anyone else not to. I have friends who will order bacon and eggs when we go out and they do ask me if it will offend me. I am always surprised (and appreciative of the sensitivity) by this as it has never bothered me. To each their own and it is nobody else’s business. By the way, the are pig farms in Israel and restaurants that serve Pork and many people, both non religious Jews and Christians eat there and nobody has ever raised an objection…..except you know who.

        • Bindon Blood says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 6:24 pm

          Enjoy it while you may because in the not too distant future pork or any pig produce will not be readily obtainable. To not eat Pork because it tends to eat anything,even it’s own waste,is rather silly to say the least. We all know that whatever is eaten is digested and used up by the body. That is why us Christians should thNk God every day for taking this burden from us.

      • Laura says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 9:11 am

        Actually, I think the muslims are the “old” Nazis…

        • Tamara Rosenthal says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 12:50 pm

          Wellington is spot-on that Christian theology does not support the atrocities some European Christians have committed in the past. Anti-religious communist regimes and regimes under many religious banners have committed atrocities, they are made up of humans and humans are very flawed and can be capable of great evil. However, the theology of Islam supports and promotes killing, converting or subjugating unbelievers and other atrocities. Christian theology does not condone such things which is why when Christianity was reformed, returned to its roots, it became peaceful and there aren’t Christians all over the world using all means including slaughtering people in order to enforce a global Christian hegemony. Islam’s reformation was Wahhabism which is what some people call radical Islam, that was an attempt to get back to Islam’s roots, which do allow for people around the world to use all means including slaughtering people to establish Islam’s hegemony, what we see today.

          This attitude that European Christianity should be apologetic and that it’s understandable that people want to ban the cross because it’s associated with “a lot of hate” is helping fanatical devotees of Islam achieve their goals and will help them do so. Making concessions in the name of political correctness, a large part of which is trying to make up for perceived and/or real historical crimes of the West, is enabling Sharia law to advance in the West.

          Europe, America, Canada and Australia have Christian heritages (maybe judeo-Christian/humanist but Christian values are a huge part of them) and celebrating a civilisation’s heritage and traditions is vital for its survival. You can’t defend a civilization when you’re constantly apologizing for it and abhor its traditions. The cross should be displayed proudly in the West.

        • Bindon Blood says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 6:26 pm

          Yes ,their ideology is very similar. Hitler admired it and said if was a masculine religion

        • DFD says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 7:41 am

          Laura says: “Actually, I think the muslims are the “old” Nazis…”

          At long last, somebody got it *nearly* right. Thank you. All that talk about ‘Islamo-Fascism’ , Bolshevism etc, is as wrong as it gets. People, KNOW YOUR ENEMY! Than we can defeat them. The Muslims have been at the supremacy and dominance thing for over 1,400 years. And very successfully so. Neither the Nazis not the Commies can hold a candle to them. Next to the Muslims, they are a bunch a ‘flash-in-the-pan’ amateurs. Again: Know your enemy! Their methods are vastly different – and very successful, so far, once they have a country completely, it stays in their grip! Stop barking up the wrong trees.

          On a lighter note:

          Why this article? I AM ON A DIET! Cutlets/pork shops… Spare ribs… Bartwurst… Hmmmhhh-drooling like Homer S. Oh bloody hell!

          Robert Spencer: Couldn’t you have reported that somehow differently?

          Right, Aldi’s or Booth’s, it’s a question of parking facilities!

  2. Jay Boo says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 am

    Black Pete

    “On the face of it, it’s obvious why many outsiders find the Dutch Christmas-time figure of “Zwarte Piet” — or Black Pete — to be shockingly racist. Here’s a tradition, after all, in which white people don minstrel-like clothes, wear frizzy wigs, paint their mouths a garish red and blacken their faces. ”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/11/13/why-the-dutch-tradition-of-blackface-at-christmas-wont-go-away/

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 6:23 pm

      “Zwarte Piet” is actually a reference to the Muslim Moorish conquest of Spain. Spain occupied the Netherlands from the late 16th to the early 18th centuries.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 6:34 pm

      I should add that “Zwarte Piet” was originally an enemy of or the dark side of Sinterklass–rather like the German Krampas. He was the one who punished bad children, and often carried a switch. That is, he was an essentially Muslim figure who hurt children.

      Over the centuries he was tamed by Sinterklass–appearing as a servant, and now just a companion of Sinterklass.

      Today, he serves rather the same purpose as do elves to department store Santas in America–just helping Sinterklass out.

      • DFD says

        Feb 24, 2016 at 7:45 am

        gravenimage says: “,,, as do elves to department store Santas in America–just helping Sinterklass out.”

        That’s constructive thinking. Now we know what to do with the Muslims, turn them into helpers. Though, that requires some *heavy convincing* before hand….

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 am

          Of course, we know this sort of taming only works with *fictitious* Muslim characters, DFD–not the real thing.

  3. Jay Boo says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:18 am

    Black Pete
    Yet, these same Dutch wackos make an exception for anything even remotely annoying to Muslims

    • Jay Boo says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      Where is the arrest warrant for this minstrel show?

  4. Dave says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:20 am

    I don’t know how many times I’ve read stories like this one thinking this is insane, its one of a kind it won’t happen again, but then another story appears… it makes about as much sense as the Mother Goose poem (soon to be banned in the NL). At least the arrested guy had a sense of humor laughing at the police

    This Little Piggy
    BY MOTHER GOOSE
    This little piggy went to market,

    This little piggy stayed home,

    This little piggy had roast beef,

    This little piggy had none.

    This little piggy went …

    Wee, wee, wee,
    all the way home!

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 6:43 pm

      Yup–here’s a similar story from the UK:

      “Couple singing Peppa Pig tune to toddler ‘forced off bus after complaints they were being racist’ because it goes against Muslim pork ban ”

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770621/Couple-singing-Peppa-Pig-theme-tune-toddler-daughter-thrown-bus-passenger-accused-racist.html

      Here’s the song in question, which would send any normal child into an attack of the giggles:

      • somehistory says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 8:18 pm

        Thanks for sharing. I can hear Porky saying, “Th…th…th…that’s all, folks.”

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 4:11 pm

          Porky was alright…forgot all about him…thanks.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 7:43 pm

          Here’s my absolute favorite Porky Pig cartoon:

          “Ali Baba Bound” (1941)

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VVY-iSI69c

          Even though it is just a silly childrens cartoon, it actually has an excellent grasp of both Muslim violence and whining fake victimhood. It also features both a suicide bomber(!) and a well earned “work accident”. Enjoy!

        • Heather says

          Feb 28, 2016 at 7:26 pm

          Thanks for posting Porky Pig cartoon. Was fun. Come to think of it, Arabs have always been portrayed in films, with their sword and as violent. Because it’s true!

  5. berserker says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:20 am

    It shows that the Dutch have submitted to their new masters. They are proactively – without receiving any complaint – stopping anything that any Muslim (even one) may perceive as offensive.

    • Mirren10 says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 5:00 pm

      ”It shows that the Dutch have submitted to their new masters.”

      I beg to differ The man *refused* to take off the pig hat, that’s why the police arrested him, so kudos to him.

      It’s the police that are doing the bidding of ‘their new masters’, not brave men like this one.

      I used to admire the police. Now I despise them all from the bottom of my heart. Nuremburg Laws enablers, each and every one.

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 6:44 pm

        Good for this patriotic Dutchman!

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 2:37 am

          gravenimage

          “Ali Baba Bound” (1941)…thank You for the cartoon…I’m all for silly.

        • DFD says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 7:51 am

          To Graven:

          Thanks for the links, particularly the the porky pig one on you tube! I just love the loony tunes….

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 12:30 am

          Glad you enjoyed them, Mark and DFD!

          And this is just more proof that while they may not have been Qur’anic scholars, that our grandparents understood more about the ugly nature of the Muslim world than do most of our contemporaries.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 6:54 am

        Ideally, what should happen now is pig hats in the very same style popping out all over. Not one, but hundreds of people.

        It’s easy to single out one pig hat wearer and arrest him.

        But you’re going to look incredibly stupid if you arrest, say, 500 peaceful citizens who are doing nothing wrong at all – who are not rioting who are just ambling quietly down the street while wearing a ridiculous pig hat. And what happens if the 500 people are also wearing “I love Bacon, Pork and Ham” T-shirts?

        Or perhaps people should wear *dog* hats. Black dogs.
        Or T-shirts with a picture of a super-cute black Labrador making puppy-eyes (Labradors are very good at that).

        Overwhelm the PC police by sheer numbers.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 4:34 pm

          The Movements Hat…silly but provocative statement…Mad As Hell And Not Going To Fake It Anymore…Give em away free to street people…more coverage.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 7:46 pm

          Hear, hear! I hope more people wore pig hats at the demonstration in Dusseldorf!

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 7:53 pm

          Oops–I meant Dresden, not Dusseldorf. Apologies.

      • mach37 says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 12:49 pm

        What it shows is that the Dutch Local Police Administrations have submitted to their new masters. Citizens should be swamping their city halls with complaints about the police department submitting to the bidding of Muslims.

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 11:14 am

      I think we should declare a “BLT Day.” Everyone should walk down the street eating a delicious bacon sandwich. I guess this would get one arrested in Europe, but not yet in the US.

      Women wearing those silly rags on their heads offend me, not to mention the black shrouds I’ve seen strolling along in Kensington Gardens. They offend me greatly. Where’s the nearest Bobby?

      Surely this arrest will not stand. Even in a Europe where everyone has become insane.

      • mach37 says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 1:48 pm

        There’s an idea; why aren’t the citizens of the UK, and the Dutch, Scandinavians, Germans, French, et al, complaining to the police when they are offended by a shrouded or hooded figure strolling about the streets and parks? It seems the police are basing their arrests on complaints. It should work both ways; unless they only arrest when the complaint comes from immigrants and refugees.

  6. Resist says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:35 am

    Stupid reaction like all that is related to muslims. These retarded so called religious adepts are trying to kill Freedom and a lot of countries are agreeing. We are heading straight to civil wars. ISSlam is a cancer destroying everything and will eventually die after killing their hosts

  7. grace says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 10:39 am

    “And what are you in for?”
    “5 years for a Peppa Pig hat.”

    What a joke.

    • Mark Swan says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 4:38 pm

      Good One

  8. somehistory says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:01 am

    There is a PSA in the U.S. that features a guy who sees a pig…a large pink one…walking down the street and he runs, rides buses, etc. and finally upon getting close, tackles the pig. He then puts money in and he and the pig have a conversation about meeting later.

    “Feed the Pig.” That ad ran frequently for some time, but I have not personally seen it recently. I wondered the last time I did see it, just how long it would be allowed to run.

    • Jay Boo says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 11:16 am

      Here is a youtube of one

      • somehistory says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 11:24 am

        Thanks, Jay. I don’t do much youtube watching, so I hadn’t seen it there.

      • David Scoltock says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 11:28 am

        Now that makes me want to make an egg and bacon banjo

        • Jay Boo says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 12:56 pm

          David
          Do they allow you to eat that at your job working for the Leftist hate propaganda central the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)

        • David Scoltock says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 3:08 pm

          I’m not a yank…..

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 3:57 am

          David Scoltock says
          February 22, 2016 at 3:08 pm

          I’m not a yank…..

          No…Not a Yank…Not a Christian…Not a Yankee Doodle Dandy…Just a Dandy.

          You are certainly resembling a Dandy…one who elevates self to a living religion… the dandy’s mere existence reproaches the ordinary person…Dandyism in certain respects comes close to spirituality and to stoicism…and no other status…but that of cultivating the idea of satisfying the passions…of feeling and thinking….For the perfect dandy…these things are no more than the symbol of the aristocratic superiority of mind.

      • Karen says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 4:26 pm

        Oh dear, another affront to Islam – piggy banks.

        • Mark Swan says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 4:44 pm

          Yep…They Gotta Go…Sorry Kids.

        • Karen says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 8:51 pm

          LOL!

        • DFD says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 7:59 am

          Karen says: “….piggy banks.”

          We’ll soon have camel or goat banks. Err… No. Camel banks, yes. Goat banks will be the future name for Muslim sperm banks.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 7:00 pm

      Yes–“Feed the Pig”–a very witty and memorable way of reminding people to prudently save for the future.

      But Muslims have also–no surprise–gone apesh*t over piggy banks, as well–and this in the Netherlands, too:

      “Netherlands: Bank stops giving piggy banks to kids for fear of offending Muslims”

      http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/02/netherlands-bank-stops-giving-piggy-banks-to-kids-for-fear-of-offending-muslims

      But this is my favorite Muslim piggy bank story, from late last year:

      “ISIS Piggy Bank Cartoon Draws Muslim Protests”

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne9A8fuDF-w

      This was a story about ISIS funding in an Indian newspaper–which used the image of a piggy bank.

      Muslims in India were not violently protesting about ISIS enslavement of Infidel women of their genocide of Kuffars–just that a newspaper would “offend” Muslims with the illustration of a piggy bank.

      Muslims have actually brought suit against the paper–let’s hope a non-dhimmi Indian judge throws this case out.

      • Aardvark says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 8:25 am

        Not just in the Netherlands, Gravenimage – here in the UK the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society decided to undertake a rebranding exercise – a new logo, redecorated branches, etc. And as part of this they were to offer small china animal models to children opening new savings accounts, such as horses, lions, and so on. ‘But not, of course, pigs!’ said the publicity guy who gave us minions a lecture on the rebranding.

        So they had decided to omit the single animal deeply associated with saving money in the UK!

        The rebranding was a complete flop, and the company was taken over by another building society with a few months. And serves them right! I had already moved on…

      • Karen says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 8:47 pm

        My comment above was meant to be funny….then I read your post about the piggy bank lawsuit in India. Sigh, does the stupidity ever end?

  9. somehistory says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:20 am

    Question: How many of the police and other authorities are moslim? Not all of them wear the particular clothes, not all have facial hair, not all openly say they are, so how can it be known if these guys making the arrest are or not?

    The mb have managed to infiltrate all kinds of organizations, governments, institutions…and it is well known there are moslims in the PD in Dearborn, MI. How about other places where the unholy code is being enforced in non-moslim countries?

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 7:11 pm

      Somehistory, I think this is more about “political correctness” and preemptive dhimmitude than an actual Muslim-majority Dutch police force–at this point, at least.

      • somehistory says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 7:43 pm

        Graven, you are most likely right. Just wondering if there were enough of them in the force to make a difference in how quickly these things are happening. When they are in a *position* to act…like in the military…they don’t hesitate to step up with their authority.
        Wasn’t there just one or two in Dearborn when they wouldn’t arrest the rock throwers and ran the Christians out of the area?

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 22, 2016 at 8:47 pm

          Certainly, I know that Muslims have infiltrated the police heavily in Britain–which is a grave concern,. I just meant that often much of the the dhimmitude in the West is self-imposed.

        • somehistory says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 9:51 am

          Absolutely, otherwise, it wouldn’t be as wide-spread.
          Part of it is pc, part of it is fear. In the State where I reside, a sheriff hired a molsim known for his radical views and did not go through the usual procedures when hiring him. Made me wonder *why* he would do that….pc…fear…or something else.

          Many people just seem to role over and play dead when confronted by the moslim threat.

  10. Panmelia says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:20 am

    It doesn’t matter whether there were any muslims around to be offended or not. If they don’t like pigs or representations of pigs, that’s their problem and they are free to go to any muslim country where everyone hates pigs. if they don’t want to go to some repressive islamic country, they can learn to STFU about anything they don’t like in a Western country – no one asked them to come and we’d much rather they all went home to whatever shithole they or their parents came from , sooner the better.

    I can’t really believe the Dutch police are so dumb that they arrested the man in case his pig hat offended muslims that weren’t there. If they did, the Netherlands is in even bigger trouble than the UK with its ludicrous official sensitivity as to what might offend muslims. The majority of the British people (that’s the people to whom this country belongs and the only ones whose opinions matter) don’t give a FF about what offends muslims; in fact we find THEM pretty offensive, but our Westminster ‘representatives’ don’t seem to care about that.

    No, I think the police themselves were offended because they don’t like being called ‘pigs’ and they thought the pig hats might be a reference to themselves. Just as stupid, but these days the PC thought police are of low mental calibre.

    • ECAW says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 12:29 pm

      This week’s topic, class, is “If a pig hat is worn and no Muslim sees it, was it really worn?”

      • Karen says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 9:05 pm

        Yes. Also, even if it’s not worn, it’s worn. Only annihilation of all pig hats everywhere for all time can make them unworn. Striking ‘pig’, ‘hat’ and ‘pig hat’ from the dictionary would also help un-offend the chronically offended.

  11. mccode says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:23 am

    Jim Henson and the Muppets gang would all be under arrest for the offensive Miss Piggy character.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 7:20 pm

      Miss Piggy fights back:

      “Miss Piggy responds to Oxford University Press’ decision to ban pigs from children’s books”

      https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/2sgd5o/miss_piggy_responds_to_oxford_university_press/

      What’s *not* so funny, though, is venerable Oxford University Press banning images of pigs and pork from their schoolbooks.

      “Oxford University Press bans sausages and pigs from children’s books in effort ‘to avoid offence’: Bizarre clampdown branded ‘nonsensical political correctness'”

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2908910/Oxford-University-Press-bans-sausages-pigs-children-s-books-avoid-offending-Jews-Muslims.html

      Of course, no Jews are demanding this–just Muslims.

      In fact, a Jewish law Jewish Leadership Council spokesman said this:

      “Jewish law prohibits eating pork, not the mention of the word, or the animal from which it derives”

      The weird thing is that I own the classic Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes, which is necessarily *full* of references to pigs and pork.

  12. Dave says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:30 am

    Exactly, next time everyone wears the hat , carries a can of SPAM, whilst reciting the Mother Goose Poem, Three Little Pigs… gotta have a little fun with it…

    • TamIAm says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 12:06 pm

      They really should do that at the next Pegida rally, at-least where the hats. It’s the only way to fight this.

      • TamIAm says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 12:07 pm

        *wear*

  13. Vyx says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:51 am

    If he’s arrested for wearing the hat, it seems to me it already IS a Muslim nation with their own version of Sharia police.

    • Karen says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 2:22 pm

      Once a land becomes ‘Muslim’, it stays ‘Muslim’ in the collective memory, and there’s no going back. This is how Spain is viewed; it became a Muslim land, then was freed, but must be reconquered again some day for Islam. So, the NL should be very careful how far they let things go, since no reversal will ever be allowed.

  14. Richie says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 am

    How long before all pork is banned in the Netherlands, and farmers are forbidden to own pigs? Meanwhile, Muslim pedophilia happens every day and the authorities look the other way

  15. Richie says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 12:03 pm

    “However there are many fundie christians who would strip us of our freedoms in the name of their own god if they could”

    Bollocks. That’s the sort of propaganda Id expect from far left leftist atheists who despise Christianity but grovel to islam.

    • Panmelia says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 12:34 pm

      Agree, Richie – see my reply to Scoltock above (Panmelia).

      But I don’t think David Scoltock is an atheist; he’s probably Jewish. He doesn’t seem to realise that any threat from Christians is history, whereas the threat from islam is a clear and present danger.

      By the way, I am an atheist after 68 years mulling over the big questions. That does not make me a leftist (far from it) or someone who despises Christianity, or a groveller to Islam (I’d die first).

      Everyone to his/her own beliefs AS LONG AS they don’t want to inflict them on anyone else, or set up a worldwide caliphate under which you have the three choices decreed by mad Mo: convert to his daft religion; be a dhimmi and pay a tax for the privilege of being allowed to live; or get the chop.

      Islamists are nazis who began their nasty belief system 1300 years before hitler was born. Those nazis took only a few years to conquer, but we’re all still in danger from islamofascists.

      • Jay Boo says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 12:46 pm

        I doubt that David is Jewish.
        I suspect more likely he is a poser trying to instigate division.

      • Jay Boo says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 12:51 pm

        Muslim migrants rape 12 year old boy
        What does David have to say about the filthy Muslims who did this?

        He complains about Christians instead

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/sweden-muslim-migrants-repeatedly-rape-12-year-old-boy-film-the-whole-thing#comment-1383567

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 7:24 pm

        David Scoltock is not Jewish–he has posted here as a Atheist many times.

        Of course, most Atheists here do not engage in witless false moral equivalence he does.

  16. pongidae rex says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    Bugs Bunny and Porky the Pig are now icons of hate speech. Any children’s show with a talking pig as a character now runs the risk of being bombed or attacked by Islamists. In response, the state bans all things porcine, even in countries that have traditionally subsisted on pork for centuries. Even George Orwell could not make this stuff up.

  17. ECAW says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 12:15 pm

    “,,, imagine what the Netherlands will be like in five or ten years. Stoning and amputations in public squares?”

    Or Britain in twenty:

    https://ecawblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/20/20-years-from-now/

  18. Georg says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 12:18 pm

    So now real life is a parody of The Onion?

  19. Jay Boo says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    This man was not arrested for wearing a pig hat.

    He was arrested for a potential violation of a — “thought crime”
    Only officially approved beliefs about Islam are considered legal in the EU.

    • Georg says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 1:56 pm

      Good point. Not that it’s the US, but just imagine if the framers of The Constitution could see this…

      If this falls outside the boundaries of legal dissent it’s going to get rough.

    • Karen says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 5:20 pm

      Exactly. The Left always knows what other people are thinking, and what their real motives are.

  20. gravenimage says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 3:56 pm

    Netherlands: Man arrested for wearing pig hat

    No Muslims were even around.
    ……………………

    Ludicrous. What happened to the Netherlands being a bastion of freedom?

    Such hats are worn for Carnival and other celebrations, at agricultural fairs, and just to make dressing up against the cold a bit of fun.

    The idea that since Islam bans the eating of pork that you can be *arrested* for wearing such a hat is grotesque.

    These hats are very common. Here’s one marketed for Hallowe’en:

    http://images.halloweencostumes.com/products/18806/1-1/peaches-pig-hat.jpg

    Here’s one for babies, where it is just a variation of the lambie pie or teddy bear cap.

    https://img0.etsystatic.com/000/0/6302766/il_fullxfull.263520240.jpg

    • Mirren10 says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 5:09 pm

      That is just adorable !

      I must buy two for my twin baby nieces, and walk them past the mosque. I do hope some mohammedan complains, and the police tell me to remove the hats … 🙂

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 22, 2016 at 7:49 pm

        Yes–aren’t they cute?

        OT–Mirren, I *think* I have your current email, but if you could let me know I would really appreciate it.

        • Mirren10 says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 4:07 pm

          I’ve just sent you an email, graven. Yes, it’s my current email address.

          I’m now busy looking for where I can buy a pig hat in the UK ! 🙂

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 pm

          Thank you, Mirren–got it!

          Here’s one place to get your piggy hat in Britain:

          “Free UK Delivery On Winter Pig Hat”

          http://www.dhgate.com/uk/winter-pig-hat-uk.html

          And here’s Amazon UK with a wide selection–twenty pages of pig hats:

          http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=pig+hats&tag=googhydr-21&index=aps&hvadid=25761115976&hvpos=1o1&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=12084297213722270378&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_7rkt5pycpn_b

          I’m sure there are many more!

      • Aardvark says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 9:03 am

        “I must buy two for my twin baby nieces, and walk them past the mosque.”

        Please don’t do that! Mohammedans are far too violence-prone to take innocent kids anywhere near them, particularly if they are dressed to irritate.

        Buy the hats for yourself and your (adult) friends, and pay the mosque a visit, but don’t put the babies at risk!

    • somehistory says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 10:04 am

      Remember the lady who had the little pig ornaments in her window? I believe it was in the U.K. several years ago. She was made to take them down, was she not? In her own home…but because people could see them when walking by. And they caused *offense* to people with more rights than she had.

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 8:12 pm

        Yes–here’s this appalling story, Somehistory:

        “Police intervene in battle of `offensive’ china pigs”

        http://www.independent.co.uk/news/police-intervene-in-battle-of-offensive-china-pigs-1157337.html

        And this was from 1998! And note: this was after she had complained about harassment from local “youth” for daring to display red, white, and blue bunting following the death of Princess Diana.

        What these “sensitive” Muslims really objected to was a demonstration of British patriotism–although few Infidels would have considered a memorial to Princess Di to be particularly political. I saw scores of such memorials in Canada on a visit there right after her death, and you found them in the US, as well.

        • mach37 says

          Feb 24, 2016 at 6:25 am

          I’m not sure if Muslims are aware that their tactics are deliberately intimidation of non-Muslims, but that is what it amounts to. And they are succeeding – by intimidating the government leaders of free nations, who have for centuries grown up according to the Golden Rule – Do Unto Others, etc. Centuries of civility and respect for others, suddenly overwhelmed by an invasion of Muslims who have no respect for others, only the Islamic ideal of forcing Infidels to yield to their way by force, by intimidation.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 12:51 am

          Oh, they know, mach37. Muhammed said, “I have been made victorious with terror”. Bullying and frightening the Infidel into submission has been a key part of Islam since the days of the “Prophet”.

        • mach37 says

          Feb 25, 2016 at 1:39 am

          My final word about David Scoltocks “The cross represents allot of hate to allot of cultures, not just the muslims.”
          The meaning of David’s words is not what he intended – after a lot of analysis I read those words as actually meaning “a lot of cultures, including the muslim culture, emanate a lot of hate for the cross.” There is most certainly not a lot of hate emanating from the cross towards other cultures.

          Then I could also nitpick his use of the word “allot,” a transitive verb which is meaningless as he used it. >:)

  21. Myxlplik says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    I just finished watching Band of Brothers again, and while I know we had our own selfish interests at play in defeating the Nazi’s. I can’t help but feel very disappointed that those guys sacrificed so much when I see how far down the road to Islamization Europe has gone in so short a period of time.

    I guess you have to be impartial, because people will use their freedom how they will, but it’s disappointing.

  22. ms dixie says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    He’s on the right track wearing a pig hat but what’s needed is for a large number of the demonstrators to wear one too. So they have to haul huge numbers of people to jail. Overburden an already overburdened court system. Meanwhile they get publicity on how ridiculous the police are acting. It’s an old civil disobedience tactic.

    • Keys says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 12:54 pm

      I’ll contribute toward purchasing thousands of them.

      Whistles blowing; hurried men unloading from troop trucks; kicking in doors searching for pig hats. Vee vill not tolerate pig hats, deez ist verboten, verstehen sie, shvine hoond!

      1984 Animal Farm.
      Filthy Schwienhunds!

    • Keys says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 1:01 pm

      Dang it! Now some of the Muslims from CAIR (maybe CEIR) can vandalize mosques wearing pig hats to make it look like the locals did it.

      We’ll all be fooled just like Sergeant Schultz was when the haywagon left the gate of Hogan’s Stalag.

  23. Vlad says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 4:20 pm

    Islam has a lot to offer to the West and IMHO we ought to take some of their teachings VERY SERIOUS. For instance, a thief will have his hand cut off. Consequently, the crime of theft is almost unheard of in an Islamic Country.

    We in the West abhor the crime paedophilia, rape and misogyny! The answer to stop or at least reduce very drastically those crimes in the Western world:
    Cut off the genitalia of all offending persons. This is done of course without ANY pain relief or any other medical attention. The offender will of course be given a clean cloth to stem the blood flow, but he will be left to his own devices.

    I would imagine, that any person witnessing such an educational spectacle after Friday prayers would learn to love and appreciate our Western values. If not, they may even seriously think of returning to their original homeland. It’s a Win-Win situation.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 22, 2016 at 8:50 pm

      Vlad wrote:

      Islam has a lot to offer to the West and IMHO we ought to take some of their teachings VERY SERIOUS. For instance, a thief will have his hand cut off. Consequently, the crime of theft is almost unheard of in an Islamic Country.
      ………………………..

      Hah! Actually, theft and violence are rife in Muslim countries. And recall that many things are not even a crime under Islamic law, such as Muslims robbing Infidels.

      • Mark swan says

        Feb 24, 2016 at 4:44 am

        Exactly

  24. Georg says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    “Man arrested for wearing pig hat”

    Just thought that bears repeating.

    Once again:

    “Man arrested for wearing pig hat”

  25. Sam says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 6:19 pm

    F********** Holland!!!

  26. Dan Jones says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 6:25 pm

    So easy to stop this war with ISIS and all Muslims… dip all bullets in pigs blood…

    More End Time News At:
    http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=4526

  27. Ren says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    Netherlands authority is surrendering to islam. How dumb of them to acting like dhimmis.

  28. gravenimage says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 7:21 pm

    He’s fighting back, Glenn–taking his now famous pig hat to a demonstration in neighboring Germany.

    • Mark Swan says

      Feb 24, 2016 at 4:13 am

      Go Pig Hat…Keep Your Snout Up…We are rooting for You

  29. sidney penny says

    Feb 22, 2016 at 11:52 pm

    http://newobserveronline.com/dutch-pegida-man-arrested-for-pig-hat/

    Dutch Pegida Man Arrested for Pig Hat

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 12:03 pm

      It appears that it took five police officers to arrest this one harmless man wearing a pig hat. I would like to see the specific law which forbids pig hats. I would further like to see a law which forbids females covering their heads with rags which I find much more offensive

      • mach37 says

        Feb 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm

        Women wearing hijabs in non-Muslim lands are flaunting their religion. Muslim men have no requirement to wear special clothing, why only the women? Of course it is for women to show submission to males. Why can’t Muslim women see that for what it is?

        When one does see Muslim men wearing the Muslim beanie, or an ankle-length white nightgown, you KNOW it is to flaunt their religion.

  30. mach37 says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 3:29 am

    If the police in the Netherlands are so fearful of anything piggish seen in public, they should be arresting farmers for raising pigs, and forbidding the ownership of pigs in that country.

    For that matter, do pigs exist at all in modern Islamic nations? If so, why are they there if Muslims are so offended by things porcine?

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 12:08 pm

      Good questions, mach37. I wonder if one is allowed to own a pet pot-bellied pig in the Netherlands. Could I walk down the street with the pig on a leash in Amsterdam? I think there are many pigs in Islamic lands. We call them Muslims.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 8:19 pm

      When the Muslim Brotherhood took over in Egypt Christian Copts there had their pigs confiscated and mass slaughtered. Too bad it was Christians using pigs who kept the garbage manageable in places like Cairo. Muslims were drowning in garbage after this, but at least they were Halal…

      “Egyptian farmers protest mandatory swine slaughter”

      http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/05/03/egypt.pig.farmers.protest/

      Egyptian authorities pretended this was about protecting against swine flu–but there had been no outbreak there. It was all about imposing Shari’ah law and causing the despised Copts to suffer.

      • Mazo says

        Feb 25, 2016 at 10:37 pm

        Cravenmirage, the Muslim Brotherhood did not rule Egypt in 2009.

  31. TheBuffster says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 8:45 am

    People who are so touchy about any insult, even an intended insult, really don’t belong in a free society.

    I see that pig hat as a statement that non-Muslims have a right to go about their business as they always have, without having to worry about the thin-skinned sensitivities of those Muslims who want everything their way. People *should* be able to wear pig hats, or have a figurine of Piglet on their desks at work. Iconic statues of piggy story characters in parks should not have to be removed and non-Muslims should be able to be served pork wherever other kafirs wish to serve it. Anyone who is offended by such things is being *irrational*, and no reasonable person should be forced to cater to irrationality.

    When the law forces reasonable people to kneel to irrational demands of unreasonable people,it has well and truly betrayed its reason for being.

    • Keys says

      Feb 23, 2016 at 12:37 pm

      Well said, Bufster! And where are the Muppets when you need them!

      Furthermore, they should be allowed to draw pictures of Mu-ham-head or Miss Piggy, if they want to.

  32. Carolyne says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 11:58 am

    Pork, when undercooked does not cause food poisoning, Dave. There is a danger that it might be infected with the trichinosis worm larvae which was present in the live pig which can survive if the meat is not thoroughly cooked. Some other meats, principally wild animals like bear and fox might also have the infection. However, any meat which has not been properly stored and cooked can cause food poisoning. It is not restricted to pork. Trichinosis larvae can pass through the intestinal tract and hatch in muscle tissue. Most will recover. The initial symptoms might mimic food poisoning, nausea and diarrhea. This problem with undercooked pork might have been known in biblical times, hence the taboo. Your zeal to disparage any non-Muslim religion is back to the drawing board, Dave.

    The simple solution to this taboo is to thoroughly cook pork and wild meat. You will then neither get food poisoning nor trichinosis.

  33. Keys says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 12:33 pm

    No free speech in the Netherlands! Stay pigheaded! Never give up!
    The guy who got arrested would make a fine Cheesehead too! Proud of him.

    If he has to take his hat off, the burqas should come off too, because I am sure alot of the Dutch, especially Dutch women, find it offensive knowing what it stands for.

  34. gravenimage says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 8:26 pm

    And how can we leave this thread without mentioning Pigman, from Bosch Fawstin, brave Muslim apostate?

    “New Comic Book Character ‘Pigman’ Wages War Against Islam”

    http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/new-comic-book-character-pigman-wages-war-against-islam

    And here’s his blog:

    http://fawstin.blogspot.com/

  35. More Ham Ed says

    Feb 23, 2016 at 11:35 pm

    MORE HAM.

  36. dumbledoresarmy says

    Feb 25, 2016 at 6:45 pm

    Here’s an idea.

    What if Geert Wilders and every member of the PVV all over the Netherlands donned identical pig hats and wore them all day every day for a week in solidarity?

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 25, 2016 at 7:01 pm

      DDA, here are Geert Wilders Supporters on Facebook saying, “We should all have this hat”!

      https://www.facebook.com/GeertWilderssupporters/posts/1036507719747482

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • iconoclast123 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Brando on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Boycott Turkey on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.