This is the kind of action — and there are so very many of them — that makes people suspicious of Obama regarding Islam, even as the mainstream media continues to dismiss all such suspicions as “racism” and “bigotry.” Even if he is not a Muslim, he seems determined to advance the global Islamic agenda at every opportunity.
“Exclusive: Obama Refuses to Hit ISIS’s Libyan Capital,” by Nancy A. Youssef, The Daily Beast, February 18, 2016 (thanks to John):
The terror group is gaining ground in Libya. But the Obama administration has said no to a Pentagon plan to go after ISIS there.
Despite the growing threat from the self-proclaimed Islamic State in Libya, the Obama administration has turned down a U.S. military plan for an assault on ISIS’s regional hub there, three defense officials told The Daily Beast.
In recent weeks, the U.S. military—led by its Africa and Special Operations Commands—have pushed for more airstrikes and the deployment of elite troops, particularly in the city of Sirte. The hometown of former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, the city is now under ISIS control and serving as a regional epicenter for the terror group.
The airstrikes would target ISIS resources while a small band of Special Operations Forces would train Libyans to eventually be members of a national army, the officials said.
Weeks ago, defense officials told The New York Times that they were crafting military plans for such strikes, but needed more time to develop intelligence so that they could launch a sustained air campaign on ISIS in Sirte.
But those plans have since been put on the back burner.
“There is little to no appetite for that in this administration,” one defense official explained….

Richard says
Undermining as ever. This started with his irresponsible visit to Egypt as some would say …
ICH says
If Trump gets in I hope he informs the public better.
Instead of hiding behind the media who only blame everyone else.
Isnt it time for America to be firm?
Tell these governments that if you harbour these idiot
you are no longer our friends.
Its like they know where they are but do nothing.
What am I missing?
Mo says
@ ICH
“If Trump gets in I hope he informs the public better.”
Of what? He knows zero about Islam. He condemned the Garland, TX event. He mocked Pam Geller. He mocked free speech.
Why do people keep insisting Trump’s going to do this or that about Islam? There’s ZERO evidence for that.
Rob Porter says
Mo, the pity is that there is “zero” evidence that any other presidential candidate will do much about Islam – or about a wall to stop illegal immigrants flooding in. They talk a lot, some speak better than Trump, but what will they do? You are in a bad way, at least Trump last night expressed his disgust over the number of Christians being savagely murdered in Iraq and Syria by ISIS and his intention of crushing ISIS. I believe he would. The rest speak well, but I don’t see in them moral outrage over what is happening all over the world as Muslims rampage. If Hillary or Bernie get in you are dead as a nation. As to Jeb Bush, having a fool like Lindsey Graham endorse him, how pathetic!
And as a matter of interest, who other than Trump will beat Clinton? Yes, he was fool over Garland and in his comments about Pamela, but you had better hope that someone smart about Islam can get through to Trump and educate him more fully.
John Kasich was very good last night. A decent man and steady, while Trump expresses himself poorly. He should not have backed off over the Pope’s stupid and disgraceful comments about himself and a wall. Where was this silly Pope’s similar criticism of Fidel Castro and Barack Obama claiming to be a Christian and yet behaving like a Muslim supporter?
So ‘it’s un-Christian to build a wall’. You should see the walls around homes in South Africa since it got useless black majority rule – and now rampant crime. People got tired of robbery and murder, but apparently protecting yourself and your family is ‘un-Christian’. Well then, Pope, dismiss the Swiss Guards! How idiotic! This Pope is a first rate clown and terrible waffler.
My fear is that if someone now overtakes Trump they will not have the support to beat Clinton and they will not have the audacity and ‘cheek’ this man has. One thing is certain, there is no perfect candidate.
Oppressaphobe says
I’m afraid that Trump cannot beat the democrats. His unlikabe numbers are high! The people who don’t like him, really don’t like him. I think pushing for Trump could really give us a democrat.
The only one I see going up against Hillary or Bernie is Ted Cruz.
The guy has intelligence and boy is he a powerful speaker! I love the tenor of his voice, I love what he says, I love his enthusiasm, I like the way he looks a little evil.
He is the best candidate I’ve ever supported and the fact that he is multicultural is just gravy! A Cuban? Are you kidding? That’s fantasic!!
Mo says
@ Rob Porter
“Mo, the pity is that there is “zero” evidence that any other presidential candidate will do much about Islam – or about a wall to stop illegal immigrants flooding in.”
Other presidential candidates are not the issue here. Trump is.
“So ‘it’s un-Christian to build a wall’. ”
I have no idea what you’re talking about. I never said any such thing. We are talking about Trump here.
“People got tired of robbery and murder, but apparently protecting yourself and your family is ‘un-Christian’.”
What idiocy. Contrary to popular belief, the Pope does not speak for biblical Christianity, okay? NOWHERE in the Bible does it teach that protecting yourself and your family is “un-Christian”. So why don’t you stop repeating lies, assuming I support them, and instead deal with what was said, not what was never said?
Denis Wilde says
True. He never answers a question with fact, just with emotion-baiting. Very clever as a demagogue. I just abhor the prospect of having to either vote for Stalin or Hitler only this time around. Bloomberg may be the spoiler, but for whom? Not voting I always believe is saying I have no contributing to “We the People” even in the apparently real status of our country today – to try to find which candidate won’t damage as much as the other(s) and have to vote for that one. Speaks terribly about a country who threw out God from schools and indoctrinates sick anti-human trash and Supreme Court worship. We are reaping O’Hair’s, Roe v Wade, Doe v Bolton, Obergefelt destruction of the Decalogue (Commandments) which history shows will continue to outlive powers that come and go. I fear we are there already. God’s Word lives forever. Get it, folks. And if you do, get others to get it. Not voting doesn’t help, despite the new Weimar Republic look that a billionaire savior allures millions of wishful thinkers. I would just add that if the Trump enthusiasts think they are throwing out the well-greased establishment types, they relinquish their own responsibility to – ironically – get government out of our way. Weimar Germany felt the same about Hitler and wanted a redeemed Germany. I can understand both situations, then and new. Wishful thinking is very very close to what so many think they are getting away from: a firmer grip on you, not by bureaucracy (only), but by a dictator. I do not argue the financial wizardry of this man, and that is a legit factor. But a buffoon on stage is not what international policy needs, even though it ranks high unfortunately on the “new American” hip list as the new pastime – soundbite entertainment. Sick, at that.
Point: vote for the one who will best ensure, if not recapture “Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (not killing from conception onwards, not government hyper-surveillance, over-taxing, etc; and pursuit of happiness, not greed. Happiness comes from not amassing but VOLUNTARILY sharing what one has. Not the government telling me or taking it to redistribute artificially or prejudicially. Any less motivation kills us and certainly “We the People.”
(Personal not policy statement )
Denis Wilde
Janice says
You are missing the fact that Obama is a muslim. Born in Kenia and not in Hawai. The hospital in Hawai where Obama was born didn´t exist at that time. Nobody knows why they put him there as president, but in Europe we think that the USA will be a muslimcountry very soon.
Carolyne says
Janice, I hope you are wrong about the US becoming a Muslim country, but I am fairly certain you are right about Obama. I assume you live in Europe. Europe is already lost because of your leaders and their greed for oil money. The United States is the last hope of mankind and unless we get the Muslims out of our government, the hope is gone.
DFD says
Carolyne says: “…Europe is already lost because of your leaders and their greed for oil money. The United States is the last hope of mankind and unless we get the Muslims out of our government, the hope is gone.”
I wish you were right. However, there’s a lot more oil money from the gulf in the US than in Europe. The investments of the ‘sovereign wealth funds’ speak volumes. And they are just the tip of the iceberg. Also, may I draw your attention to the worlds debtclock? See: http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/ go to USA.
As far as the islamization of the US and Europe are concerned. I am having a discussion somewhere else. The thematic being if Europe can get rid of the Muslims or not, and if so, the resultant right wing governments would be topples by the US, with Europe being unsuspecting. And wanting to be the new Roman Empire…
I replied by pointing out what the Muslims can expect in Germany, re 30 years war, and the various resistance movements and fight backs already in operation. Particularly Germany and Britain. I snipped that part and continued as below, and believe me, I do hope you are right. But the Americans, your people will have to rise…..
Snipped…..
…. continued…. What has been said for Germany can also be said for the Balkans, whilst Russia too has a massive Muslim problem.
American interference / promotion of Islam? Let us look at the ‘resurrected Roman Empire’. The answer is that this is highly probable, but everybody is looking at the wrong half. The EU is just that, the EU – wishful thinking. It’s Byzantium, the eastern half which will, quite likely, result from all this.
That leaves the question of the US. Intervene and topple, you said. I don’t think that’s likely. The Byzantine states, including Germany (and potentially even the Scandinavians), are well aware of the US’s servitude to Islam, or rather to the gulf states. Whilst Europe looked the other way during the Balkan wars, hoping the Muslims get thrashed, the US interfered, taking the lead over the very reluctant Europeans. Strengthening the two Muslim nations in Europe, Bosnia Herzegovina and Albania, whilst also establishing a new one, Kosovo (That’s where king Lazar made his famous last stand against the Muslim hordes: “Today we give up everything for Christ, and Christ for nothing!”). A friend of mine watched and facilitated as a peacekeeper the destruction of countless churches and the ethnic cleansing of Christians, as also happened in Albania. Still makes him sick. Many Europeans are well aware that the first rape camps were established, and run for several months, by the Muslims, the Bosnians. The Serbs then retaliated massively – which brought in the Americans to protect and promote the Muslims.
Likewise, the Europeans, east of France that is, are flabbergasted about Americas submissiveness to Islam/gulf states. Even though the US is the Muslims prime target, far more people killed than in Europe since 9/11, killings occur practically every week. Yet, there are hardly protest demonstrations, never mind an uprising against the invaders/colonists. Nor low level counter actions, except for “nation building”; hilarious. And that from a people who are armed and have easy access to weapons, it’s just stunning. Really stunning from European point of view. Byzantium will look far more to Russia than the US, they will definitely ally, if not merge. Even the AfD (Alternative fur Deutschland) is making friendly overtures to Russia, and Russia is responding in kind. I do have my doubts that the US would take on an alliance of Byzantium and Russia, I doubt that very much. I also doubt that the American public would want to enter a suicidal war for the Muslims. Neither would the politicians, the US couldn’t hope to win such a confrontation, not in it’s wildest dreams. Nuclear, that’s western and eastern suicide for the Muslims, not an option either. Moreover, many Americans begin at long last to realize that we are in the same boat, facing the same enemy. An attack on Byzantium (by or whatever name)? Perhaps under Obama, yes, but by that time he wont be in power. With him the Muslims have played their strongest card.
Ralph Statum says
http://blackbeltsurvivalprogram.com/?aff_id=666&subid=wEP5F6BJH4J91OPQ0867IT7I
Carl Thomas says
Obama says he is not a moslem, but what you lern between 1-6 years old get embedded in your subonscious, so he is consciously a Christian and subconsciously a muslim. No escape fom this.
Oppressaphobe says
But the effect is the same Carl.
I truly believe otherwise: that this man was hand-picked by muslim power brokers to infiltrate the untied states body politic. He voted either present, or against most traditional American values when in senate.
He did not expose himself during his candidacy, but waited and slowly exposed who he really was. He is an underminer of all that we have stood for many years. He was sent to turn our carts upside down and to confuse and disorient the American public,which has succeeded in doing splendidly.
In other words, he is engaging in political guerilla warfare. We, in America, like the british in their day, do not understand this type of warfare. The British got their clocks cleaned by the American Indians, hiding behind trees in an unconventional style of warfare. Those beautiful red uniforms and very special helmets did no good, while they preceded ever forward in their flanks.
Britain had to re-think how they fought wars. Now here in America, we are forced to re-think how we win political wars. I guess the American indian was the first to use terrorism in our country, and I am an American indian so no disrespect intended.
But that’s exactly how I see barach Obama and if I read olinsky I’m sure I could back that up, but I won’t waste my time on that garbage. I know what I see and hear and feel.
The only way to fight Obama and his ilk, right now, is through guerilla type warfare, taking potshots from behind the trees. Sneaking up on his agenda and turning it over on its head. Exposing his idiot followers to be the morons that they really are. It’s hand to hand combat on the blogs, in the public square of opinion, etc..They go for the pop culture stuff and use tools like beyonce. We should also engage in such where possible. Anything goes in this type of war. They would even stoop to assassination, in my opinion, but we are more godly than that.
WorkingClassPost says
Sirte is such an easy target too.
It’s on the coast and vulnerable to all manner of sophisticated hardware, not just expensive and dangerous airstrikes.
Place a ready task force in International waters, and issue an ultimatum to whoever they think is in charge of Libya:-
Sort it out, or we will.
Jay Boo says
Stand Down
Yet, Obama and the EU had no problem defending Muslim Brotherhood backed Islamists in toppling Khadafy because under the false pretense of defending civilians.
Charli Main says
But–but—but Muslim dictators are infinitely more dangerous than Muslim terrorists.
It was essential to Assad, Gadhafi and Sadam Hussein with the peaceful, democracy loving and Human Rights respecters of ISIL, Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Just look how Iran has prospered and thrived since that vile dictator, the Shah was disposed off.
Charli Main says
Sorry for typo—it was essential to replace—– etc
mortimer says
Why launch a ‘sustained’ campaign when small commando pinch raids will remove important information and leaders? The main thing is to keep pressure on these groups and keep them from organizing into something bigger. The Libyan government and people should deal with them.
Anne Smith says
There are rumours that something like that is currently being organised.
Myxlplik says
Until and unless we can all agree not to allow any Muslim into the West anymore, I’m not for hitting anyone over Islam for what it has done or is doing in foreign countries.
Hitting stuff over there just creates more instability which leads to more Muslims (read Islam and destruction) over here. Muslim numbers in the West going down are all that matters. Hitting stuff over there is counter productive to that goal.
Oppressaphobe says
But remember, raising cane over there, then allowing them to come here is what they want. The study out of Germany says that bringing in more terrorists prevents terrorism!?
Go figure, but anyway, that seems to be the ultimate goal our leaders are embracing–bring in more and more muslims.
Now nevermind that their strategy fits into the enemies like a hand in a glove.
It’s not a good day to be a logical, common sense person.
Robert Schnebelen says
He’s not going to take out anything there…..he’s afraid he’ll kill one of his Muslim kinfolk!
Baucent says
“The airstrikes would target ISIS resources while a small band of Special Operations Forces would train Libyans to eventually be members of a national army, the officials said”
Problem is it all sounds a lot like Afghanistan, Iraq and now Syria. No success stories anywhere in sight, why would Libya be different?
gravenimage says
You have a point, Baucent.
But is Barack Hussein Obama really denying this Pentagon request because he fears ultimately strengthening Jihadists? I very much doubt it…
Carolyne says
Of course not. He is a Muslim and while the Koran directs him to kill infidels, it does not command him to kill Muslims en masse without an individual particular reason. If the reason is to preserve an infidel country, such as the US, it doesn’t count.
Angemon says
This is what happens when you have a President who simply knows better than his advisers (you know, the people who specialize in a given matter, paid and tasked with dedicating their working ours studying it and all the available scenarios):
http://www.aei.org/publication/obama-im-a-better-intelligence-briefer-than-my-intelligence-briefers/
l says
Nice picture. Wanna bet he already has a copy of it and it’s hanging in his west wing ‘den’. He had to decide which mirror to switch out with the photo…
Teresa Karcich says
I have believed that Obama is a Muslim for a long time since I found out that his religious training in Indonesia was in Islam. This occurred at a very impressionable stage of his life and I think that he has retained a certain reverence for Islam. Seen in that light, his actions seem very understandable and predictable Everything he does bolsters and defends Islam. He is also unable or unwilling to see ISIS as an Islamic phenomenon because it would go against his bias.
Anne Smith says
Wasn’t it the Jesuits who said “give me a child until he is seven and I will give you the man”.
Seems they were right.
Keys says
Yes, and don’t forget that most men want to please their fathers, as well.
Significant he changed his name and wrote a book, “Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance”.
Angemon says
The “Dreams From His Father” were of seeing white-majority superpowers being brought down.
Nimrod says
Everyone knows you can’t win the hearts and minds of brutal murdering and raping jihadists if you’re trying to kill them!
So the strategy is, just let them go on raping, pillaging, and killing while you work to win their hearts and minds.
What could possibly go wrong?
Champ ✿ says
“As I grow older, I pay less attention what men say. I just watch what they do.” — Andrew Carnegie
Enter obama: who claims to be a Christian, but he behaves like a muslim.
Things that make you go, hmmm …
Champ says
o0ps! “…I pay less attention *to* what men say.”
Hope says
Barack Obama is a dangerous leftist ideologue and a Muslim, admitted or not. The worst thing to happen to this country since Richard Nixon. Can we survive as a nation until January of 2017?
Peter Charles says
Worst president ever, worse than Jackson or Wilson…..
Champ ✿ says
Agreed!
Judi says
I think he’s beaten Jimmy Carter to take the No.1 spot.
Baucent says
Jimmy must be quietly satisfied he has lost that spot.
Mo says
Traitor.
Why hasn’t this man been impeached yet?
Oppressaphobe says
Because we’re a bunch of ninnies! Don’t go too deep with this.
somehistory says
If he was of a different *color* and islam was not a *protected species* or if the group causing all of the mayhem everywhere was nazi or skinheads, etc, and he proceeded thus, the majority of mankind would recognize what is happening.
It is because it is *islam* and its *image* must be protected…for now.
If a man given to drinking too much on a daily basis misses work several times a week, eventually his employees and co-workers will no longer believe that he is just *ill.*
This situation has gone on long enough that those who don’t suffer from a deficit of honesty can clearly see what is happening. Some people will never see it because they don’t wish to.
(Revelation tells us why)
Oppressaphobe says
Being black is a beautiful thing, especially if you’re a muslim infiltrater.
All this talk about Obama being the first black president! What did he do for blacks in the hood?
Did Chicago stop killing each other? Did he use the bully pulpit to talk to the gangs. d
I hoped for a steady stream of young blacks from the hood in and out of the whitehouse for a little TLC and encouragement. I wanted to see them plastered all over the media and showing how they changed their life because of the outreach of the first black president.
Where is it?
Keys says
Did you have the audacity to hope to put frequent visitor, Sharpton, out of business?
Oppressaphobe says
I won’t miss the good Reverend.
Wonder what kinda hell is gonna break loose when Sharpton, BLM, Cair, Black Panthers, and all these radical groups that he has courted, are put back in their proper place in society?
It ain’t gonna be pretty–just a sneaking suspicion they have a plan not to go away quietly.
Voytek Gagalka says
“…he [Obama] seems determined to advance the global Islamic agenda at every opportunity.”
His objective is total destruction of America. He is a nihilist, destroyer, enjoying destruction for the sake of destruction. “Global Islamic agenda” interests him only as a tool of this destruction. So perhaps, indeed, he is not a Muslim, but that is really irrelevant here and does not help us to understand him fully. His nature is very similar to character of Yago from Shakespeare’s “Othello.”
DFD says
Voytek Gagalka says: !”… a nihilist, destroyer, enjoying destruction for the sake of destruction. “Global Islamic agenda” interests him only as a tool of this destruction. So perhaps, indeed, he is not a Muslim, but that is really irrelevant here…”
If you wouldn’t have said ‘Obama’, ‘America’ and ‘he”, I would have sworn you were talking about Merkel and Germany.
These two wouldn’t have an affair, could they, would they?
Charli Main says
The organ grinder and his pet monkey ???????
DFD says
To Charli Main
Good question. But who’s the grinder and who’s the monkey? Any suggestion?
John says
If Obama attacked ISIS in Libiya it would ruin his and Erdogans plans to over run Europe with Jihadi rapists, pedophilies and killers.
Rob Porter says
Gee, how surprising! Putin is right, this worthless, Muslim supporting traitor of a president is not determined to eliminate ISIS and Putin is right, Obama is only “pretending” to fight ISIS. And he has shown himself arrogant and stupid enough to imagine that Putin will fall in line with his methods of powder puffing ISIS. With poofy Obama the de facto leader of NATO and ‘commander-in-chief’ (hysterical laughter breaks out!) of the United States, Putin must have utter contempt for NATO. He will do as he pleases.