“Fatihah, a self-proclaimed sharia-adherent Muslim, alleges that he was not permitted to use the Neal’s firing range because he was Muslim in violation of state and federal anti-discrimination laws. But the facts will prove otherwise. On October 23, 2015, Fatihah entered the Neal’s facility with an AK-47 over his shoulder, magazine inserted. The firing range is an outdoor range, and it was pouring rain that day—no one in their right mind (at least no one without an agenda) would even consider shooting on a day like this. Consequently, Fatihah was the only one at the range that day (in fact, there was an indoor range available to him in Tulsa if he was truly interested in only shooting).”
Clearly Fatihah was trying to provoke a reaction he could use to do exactly what he is doing. And that’s the best possible spin one can put on his behavior.
“Raja ‘ee Fatihah (CAIR) v. Neal (Save Yourself Survival & Tactical Gun Range),” American Freedom Law Center, February 19, 2016:
On February 17, 2016, Raja’ee Fatihah, a board member of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) of Oklahoma, with the assistance of CAIR legal counsel and the ACLU, sued Chad (a disabled Iraqi war veteran) and Nicole Neal, the owners of the Save Yourself Survival and Tactical Gun Range, which is located in Oktaha, Oklahoma.
The American Freedom Law Center is representing the gun range owners.
Fatihah, a self-proclaimed sharia-adherent Muslim, alleges that he was not permitted to use the Neal’s firing range because he was Muslim in violation of state and federal anti-discrimination laws.
But the facts will prove otherwise. On October 23, 2015, Fatihah entered the Neal’s facility with an AK-47 over his shoulder, magazine inserted. The firing range is an outdoor range, and it was pouring rain that day—no one in their right mind (at least no one without an agenda) would even consider shooting on a day like this. Consequently, Fatihah was the only one at the range that day (in fact, there was an indoor range available to him in Tulsa if he was truly interested in only shooting).
These facts alone raise enough suspicion for the owner of a gun range (an inherently dangerous business) to ask the person to leave. But there was more.
While no one at the range ever asked Fatihah what his religion was, he became confrontational with the owners over his religion and his adherence to sharia, further raising the owners’ concerns about this man’s motives and intent. In fact, the owners seriously feared for their personal safety.Consequently, they asked Fatihah to fill out a form and then told him that they would get back with him regarding whether he could fire at the range. The owners then promptly (and rightfully so) did a background check on Fatihah and found out that he was a board member of CAIR—an organization with strong ties to terrorism—confirming the owners’ suspicions.
Robert Muise, AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel, commented:
This case is not about religious discrimination; it’s about public safety. We should applaud Chad’s and Nicole’s vigilance. Indeed, such vigilance is the only way we will keep our society safe from violent jihadists. Had others been as vigilant with Army Major Nidal Hasan or the San Bernardino shooters, we may very well have averted those tragedies. Chad and Nicole should be congratulated for resisting political correctness and doing what was right under the circumstances.
David Yerushalmi, AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel, added:
The law does not require a gun shop or gun range owner—owners of an inherently dangerous business—to equip or train the next jihadist. CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front group, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation criminal trial—the largest terrorism financing trial prosecuted to date, the FBI has severed all ties with CAIR, and the UAE has declared CAIR a terrorist organization. Consequently, our clients’ public safety concerns were entirely justified. Not only do our clients have a right to refuse to serve someone they believe to be a public safety risk, they have an obligation to their other customers, employees, and the community to do so. This type of litigation by CAIR and the ACLU weakens our local and national security. People should be outraged by their filing of this lawsuit.
Muise concluded:
It is evident that this lawsuit is part of CAIR’s “civilization jihad” against America and our freedoms. Lawsuits like this are designed to intimidate and threaten law abiding American citizens so that they take no action when confronted with a situation involving a potential Islamic terrorist. Remember the neighbor of the San Bernardino jihadists. He feared being sued or labeled an Islamophobe by groups like CAIR and the ACLU, causing him to remain silent. And his silence proved deadly.

African infidel says
This evil muslim is expanding islamic sharee’a supremacism and will very like win and probably get millions of court ordered monies! DON’T ALLOW HIM TO WIN!
Oppressaphobe says
Warning: I think they are after a sharia friendly supreme court judge. Watch these developments like a hawk.
Jay Boo says
How many mosques are stacked to the brim with AK-47’s?
These are the king of people we are dealing with.
Wake up America.
gravenimage says
You aren’t wrong, Jay Boo. Here are just a couple of stories:
“France mosque yields AK-47 bullets, ISIS propaganda”
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/745358/france-mosque-yields-ak-47-ammunition-isis-propaganda
“AK-47 training held at London mosque”
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/feb/17/terrorism.religion
There are many more stories, including a huge AK-47 stash found at a Mosque in Kenya a couple of years ago.
gungadin says
Here in the states mosques are popping up like zits on a teenagers skin all over our once beautiful landscape…..factor in BLEEDING HEART liberals who wont monitor the comings and goings of those who go to these mosques because of “Freedom of Religion” , I get an unsettling feeling in my stomach everytime I pass one of these “mosques” or should I say armories?
Dave Flang says
Muslims will continue to test what they can away with. They have their children to it in the schools and want to have everyone in fear.
Jay Boo says
SUE MUSLIMS
The Catholic Church was sued for pedophile priests.
The KKK was sued for inciting violence.
Sue MUSLIMS and their IMAMS at mosques for San Bernardino, Boston, Ft Hood etc.
Christianblood says
Very well-said! Sue them to hell for God’s sake!
Darryl Kerney says
that just might be the way to fend them off !
i’m Canadian, we sometimes joke that suing is the American way,
my opinion has suddenly shifted more to the positive side on that subject !
what angers me is how the muslims can get away with what any rational person
should see as “incitement to violence” in their mosques but people trying to point
it out are somehow the “hateful” ones, it’s bullshit, we don’t do it from hate, but from CONCERN
that our fellow citizens are being put in DANGER,
We do it because we see a threat to those we care about and our very way of life,
and those who think it’s wrong to hate something that threatens our way of life and even our very existence need to be shown that their tolerance and inclusion is fine, but they need to know where to draw the line, it’s insane to “include” those who are against your way of life in every way and want to destroy it and replace it with their way. it makes no more sense to be tolerant of followers of an ideology that’s directly opposed to ours than it does to knowingly tolerate rat poison in your food.
it think we need to hammer home that idea,
we speak up because WE CARE and don’t want to see our society cannibalized by a culture that hates ours and seeks to dominate us.
with all the Safety obsession today you’d think the bleeding heart types would at least catch a tiny wiff of the danger, but no, they think everyone has to be saved by them, even those who would gladly behead them.
billybob says
Your comment reminds me of statistics recently released by the Southern Poverty Law Center supposedly documenting hate groups. Their statistics showed an increase in KKK memberships and black separatist groups, as well as a modest rise in – you guessed it – Islamophobia.
What their charts failed to include was the biggest hate group of all – Muslims, whose religious texts promote hate against Jews, Christians, women, and kafirs.
Mark Swan says
This rhetoric which is termed resolution is ignoring existing law that applies
to all citizens and attempts to create special law for of course special purpose…Votes…and much more…One Law…One People.
There is a calculated popular ploy being played on the minds of the general public…to cause some to be viewed as victims…when they are not…at the expense of others…who can then actually be made unsuspecting victims themselves…accomplished by people who make their living by claiming a cause for an invented victimization…when done using deceit and misinformation…many do respond thinking them to be a real cause…donating to these professional panhandlers…helping them grow in profits and increase in propaganda…which is how they keep up the good work.
They find their niche and will work it for all it is worth…often a lot.
If We really wanted to control Hate Speech…We would need to go after some
of the Prominent offenders…Al Sharpton…Jesse Jackson…Lewes Foregone …just to name these three…would be a sincere start…honorable mentions of every kind has been poured on these Hate Monsters.
Show One Law for One People…no more Hyphenated Americans.
I am Thinking Book Here!
Oppressaphobe says
Do it! Anybody can, right? Anybody who can sue the muslims now is the time to raise the stakes.
Myxlplik says
Any self proclaimed Sharia adherent Muslim should not be allowed to own firearms, due to background checks. In fact one could argue that he should be arrested for Sedition, or treason on the spot and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Darryl Kerney says
if he’d have shown up at the range in a Nazi uniform with a machine gun he would have been shot without hesitation and the shooter likely praised as a hero,
i see no reason islam should not be considered just as vile,
it’s been around way longer, has far more followers, has caused the slaughter of far more people,
and is every bit as totalitarian,
only it’s “religious” veneer fools the gullible and makes them defend what would horrify them if they really knew islam’s true intentions and methods.
Oppressaphobe says
Yeah they scream about gun laws and then THEY DON’T ENFORCE THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE?
This guy should not have guns and if he does, the legal system has not adequately charged him with seditious, anti-government activity.
gungadin says
I would think that the POS who wanted to fire his weapon on a rain saturated and soaked range –well let’s say his elevator doesnt run all the way to the top —-and the fact that he is Shaia compliant in my mind he shouldnt have gained entry into the United States in ANY manner…..but that being said, hey look we have sunk so badly that there’s now a SOCIALIST running for President….AKA Bernie Sanders
Who would have EVER believed THAT day would come? i
Rev g says
In all fairness, I know quite a few people who would find a rain soaked and saturated day perfect for going shooting, especially with an AK47. I assure you that every one of them is quite mentally stable.
Still, I do understand your point.
Undaunted says
At any range I’ve ever been to there are rules clearly posted on the exterior of all entrances advising all coming in that all weapons must be in holsters or closed cases and, unless worn legally concealed, may not be loaded or have a magazine inserted. So, this POS was in violation of basic range etiquette from jump.
Remorseless says
I agree 100%. I was a range safety officer back in Ft. Lauderdale and the facility was VERY clear regarding loaded weapons. This applied even to off-duty law enforcement. In addition, the Range Master, at his discretion, could close the facility or suspend shooting activity if dangerous conditions, (i.e., inclement weather) existed. It had nothing to do with political or religious affiliation, simply public safety. If Mr. Fatihah is so anxious to slog through mud and shoot, I suggest he join the Army. Unfortunately, all too many of his like-minded brothers already have and we are in the process of training them.
gravenimage says
Absolutely, Undaunted.
Oppressaphobe says
He was in direct violation of the rules of said establishment and HE STILL GOT A LAW SUIT?
What the hell world are we living in? This is so over-the-top ridiculous that it should wake people up to what is really going on here. Western nations are being taken over by muslims by hook or by crook or by any other means that they have at their disposal–typical terrorism.
Terrorism should not be limited to bombs. Infiltrating schools, the united states executive branch, and now the judicial branch: all these acts we’ve been witnessing for 7 years +, are overt acts of terrorism. We have to get out of the mindset that terrorism is only suicide bombers. Terrorism is constantly morphing to fit the container like water.
Terrorism is fluid: we need to understand it at its root to combat it. These types of events are just as much terrorism as SB. We are just bullied into thinking whatever they want us to think: example, the word islamophobe. This term has played a big role in seducing an entire population so that you can conquer them bit by bit.
Fight tooth and nail with all the guerilla war tactics that they use all the time. Give them their own medicine and more. That’s the only way to win: Understand it, Resolve to fight it, and Don’t listen to the duped.
underbed cat says
Typical response from the care group, and exactly the reason why they exist, and support learning the skills of the acting trade.
Nothing to see here ….yeah right.
jihad3tracker says
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO MISSED CAIR’S FIRST ATTEMPT TO USE THIS “ANTI-MUSLIM” DISCRIMINATION FAKERY —-
Use the search function here with relevant words (sorry for not having the exact lead already to cite) — but if my ancient memory is correct, that incident at a FLORIDA GUN SHOP happened about 6 months ago or thereabouts.
THE POINT ??? —- The judge deciding to dismiss the suit gave a lengthy and astonishingly complete chronology (of settled law) on why CAIR HAD NO LEGAL STANDING IN THE MATTER. Even if you are not an attorney (I am not either) take the necessary 15 minutes or so to read her opinion.
IT PROVES MY OFTEN REPEATED ASSERTION ABOUT CAIR’S STUPIDITY — EXTENDING EVEN TO THEIR LAWYERS. Hey, sincere worshippers of Allah have an inborn IQ limit which they display over and over again.
jihad3tracker says
This is a link in Jihadwatch for the successful motion-to-dismiss by Mr. Muise and Mr. Yerushalmi, at the American Freedom Law Center:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/11/federal-court-grants-aflcs-motion-to-dismiss-hamas-linked-cairs-lawsuit-against-florida-gun-stores-muslim-free-zone
BTW, I would not be surprised if, after announcing her granting of the motion, the judge said “I strongly urge counsel for CAIR to go to law school again, but this time do not sleep through courses on the history of, and basic concepts appertaining thereto, of civil litigation. Consider yourself extremely fortunate that I do not order you to drop trouser and bend over, upon which the bailiff would apply this Court’s Gross Incompetence Bullwhip to your bare ass until it turns the color red that would be on your face if you had the capacity to understand how grossly you have failed in representation!”
gravenimage says
Yes–I was really glad to hear CAIR’s bullsh*t “lawfare” suit failed in this case, jihad3tracker.
But they are not going to stop–not yet, anyway. They hope to use our own courts against us.
tilda says
The cases are different. In this matter it’s Fatihah himself who’s doing the suing. He’s backed by CAIR, but he’s suing as an individual.
The judge’s reasons for dismissing the earlier case can be found via links toward the end of this page on the AFLC website: http://www.americanfreedomlawcenter.org/case/cair-florida-inc-v-teotwawki-investments-llc-florida-gun-supply/
jihad3tracker says
Yes, that is a difference which I was aware of — but thank you for bringing it up. Civil cases, if there is discovery and a busy docket, can take quite some time for disposition. Not mentioned in the AFLC’s summary above is a possible 1st Amendment issue, which could take this in an additional direction.
Mr. Muise & Mr. Yerushalmi have such litigation experience for Pam Geller’s “core political speech” adventures involving public space signage-adverts. I look forward to AFLC arguments bearing on the owners’ posted notices at their private gun range, although we likely won’t know details until a transcript is released upon a decision.
Mac McNeil says
And still he has no legal standing… I expect that a shooting range can refuse service to anyone.
tilda says
@ Mac McNeil — Yes, he does have legal standing. The right of the shooting range to refuse service is a different issue.
Rev g says
One more reason to belong to a gun club with its own range. Both our outdoor rifle and pistol ranges have awnings over the shooting stations.
Most of our members are also certified range safety officers, even a member would be chastised for such poor handling of the weapon. Members are responsible for the actions of their guests as well.
This problem would never happen at our gun club.
Cecilia Ellis says
“Cool AK-47! How would you like to bring it to the White House?” . . . (Sarcasm)
This incident is a perfect example, as was Clock Boy, of “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” in action . . . the Muslim Brotherhood using our laws to achieve its goals, as addressed in the following extract from that memo:
“In order for Islam and its Movement to become ‘a part of the homeland’ in which it lives, ‘stable’ in its land, ‘rooted’ in the spirits and minds of its people, ‘enabled’ in the live (sic) of its society and has firmly-established ‘organizations’ on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain ‘the keys’ and the tools of this process in carry (sic) out this grand mission as a ‘Civilization Jihadist’ responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in this country.”
Clock Boy would be proud . . . (more sarcasm). What a set-up!
wallace says
Cecilla says “Cock Boy would be proud” was just thinking the same thing. Next “cool ak47 Raja’ee do you want to bring it to the White House?”
Oppressaphobe says
Yes, I wish he would! That would get some people fired up.
Carolyne says
…..And the UN, and MIT….and Mark Zuckerburg will give you loads of technical equipment so you can build even more deadly weapons. And then Loretta Lynch (Possibly our next Supreme Court Justice) will investigate the gun range. And Oman will give you a scholarship to go to school free. And then you can come back and sue for $12,000,000,000.
The United States of America has lost its collective mind.
Cecilia Ellis says
Meanwhile, “the Army sergeant who is facing the possibility of being ousted from service simply for protecting an Afghan boy from a child molester will likely learn his fate any day.”
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/19/decision-looms-for-army-sergeant-who-protected-afghan-boy.html
It is Interesting that CAIR would not become involved in the effort to honor this American hero for his efforts to protect a child from being raped, but will leap to stage events that hurt Muslim feelings! What liars!
gravenimage says
Thanks for mentioning this case, Cecilia–I have noted it as well.
That good Americans have been officially ordered to countenance Muslim *rape of little boys* so as not to upset their Mohammedan “allies” is grotesque.
This Sergeant is a hero!
Darryl Kerney says
absolutely.
Mark Swan says
Sgt. First Class Charles Martland…is one of the many higher ranking Non Commissioned Officers that We just can not afford to lose…so many like Him have died or were badly injured already…these are the back bone of our military…I remember the list of dead on the news…over the years there…so many Sergeants and above in rank listed…what a loss…irreplaceable.
Not making all the mindless…monstrous…behavior public about Afghan Men
…no excuses for this…none…what have We to do with defending them.
Carolyne says
CAIR protects Islam and its customs. Raping children is the Muslim way. Don’t dare interfere or you will be prosecuted.
Stuart Miller says
The Florida Gun Shop case refernced above is:
CAIR FLORIDA, INC., v.TEOTWAWKI INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a Florida Gun Supply
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 15-cv-61541-BLOOM/Valle
CAIR alleged that Florida Gun Supply’s refusal to equip Islamic terrorists is religious discrimination in violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act.
Because CAIR could not show any harm or injury, the court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.
See: http://www.americanfreedomlawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Order-Granting-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf
Mickey says
Undaunted is right.
Hey, folks, you can’t walk into a gun store or a gun range with a loaded weapon hoisted on your shoulder, unsecured in a holster or not in some sort of carrying case. You can’t go to gun shows with loaded weapons.
This Muslim dude was threatening those store owners. At the very least, he showed none of the proper etiquette that law-abiding firearm owners show to one another at these venues.He’s not NRA nor is he 2nd Amendment.
He’s a sharia-sh–head.
Linda says
He should not even be here or able to carry a gun
Oppressaphobe says
And why wasn’t he charged with intention to commit an act of terrorism?
How many people are yanked off the airlines and charged for forgetting their guns, or something like that.
Point is: we have laws still, right? The American business owner is still protected by said laws, right?
miriamrove says
He did on purpose to bring a law suit hence money. That how the young muslim girl sued Aberchobie.M
somehistory says
You are right. It was all deliberate, knowing what the owner’s response would be when he went in and made a big stink.
This is terrorism by law-fare. If the judge (jury) has any sense of what is right and wrong legally, he will lose and should be fined for carrying a loaded firearm. Isn’t this the kind of gun that those against the ‘Constitutional right to bear’ in government wish to *outlaw*?
If somehow he wins, he helps set up the next time when someone knows they should say no, but are afraid to.
Disney and the hat.
Ketchup and lawnmowers, hospitals, meat processors, beer haulers…wherever they get hired, they then bring in more and more of their demands, walking off the job, suing. All for the purpose of striking fear, getting their extortion…suit…money and making everyone else ready to capitulate to their ever-increasing demands.
Myxlplik says
OT:
I’ve got great news! If Trump wins Canada will accept fleeing Americans to repopulate Nova Scotia, “Where Muslims are allowed to roam free”, the land of “abortion”.
http://qz.com/619470/an-island-in-nova-scotia-to-americans-if-trump-wins-you-can-move-here/
Liberal paradise in Nova Scotia… too funny.
Darryl Kerney says
they will be overrun with socialists wanting Free Stuff,
and will collapse like Zimbabwe,
the rest of us Canadians will be forced to bail them out.
Carolyne says
Muslims wouldn’t like it. Its too cold there for their sensitive bodies
“Oh give me a home where the Muslims do roam.”
JIMJFOX says
This will continue unless and until the Obamanation leaves the White House-assuming
the equally evil muslim lover Shrillary is not elected…
Carolyne says
And assuming Obama leaves the White House. I have my doubts.
Truth says
This man needs to learn a word that Muslims use about Africans: Abeed. It means slave.
Hope says
Sssssssssssssssss
Can you hear it? That hissing sound, every time the snakes from CAIR rear their ugly heads. Snakes, nests of vipers, venomous and deadly. Obama’s best friends, Hillary’s as well. Have you noticed they are everywhere now? Fulfilling the manifesto of the MB, the document that outlines the plan to take down North American civilization and destroy it from within. Not enough Americans understand what is really going on, that this lawsuit is a set-up to further the Islamist cause, to overwhelm the justice system, to silence freedom-loving Americans.
Angemon says
My feelings exactly.
gravenimage says
Oklahoma: Muslim with loaded AK-47 sues after being turned away from outdoor shooting range in heavy rain
…………………………
Clearly, this whole episode was ginned up by CAIR. Fatihah even mentioned Islam himself, clearly hoping he could get someone at the firing range to say something “Islamophobic” he could use against them.
I’m so glad the stalwart David Yerushalmi is involved with this case.
And here’s “CAIR Oklahoma Exposed’s” Facebook page, where you can learn more about what this nasty Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization is up to in the Sooner State:
https://www.facebook.com/CAIR-Oklahoma-Exposed-303414104839/
Jeffrey A Friedberg says
Look at tha face: so kind; so caring; so innocent; so gosh-darn downright pleasant.
KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM says
And look at the sincerely concerned visages of the Turds lined up behind the Piece Of Camel Dropping (POCD) at the lectern.
Mark swan says
Yep
gravenimage says
Along with lawsuits like these, CAIR is also trying to silence critics of Islam:
“Dozens of Lawsuits Used to Hide ‘Islamic Realities’
Think-tank report cites 150 attempts to silence free speech”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/dozens-of-lawsuits-used-to-hide-islamic-realities/#mpizMC8DpFxv2SPP.99
And this was from a couple of years ago–I’m sure there’s been even more since.
billybob says
Thanks for that link.
jihad3tracker says
+++++ HERE IS A LINK TO THE “FATIHAH VERSUS GUN-RANGE” CIVIL COMPLAINT) +++++
https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/complaint-fatihah-v-neal
tilda says
Interesting reading.
Under the heading “Statement of Facts”:
“35. Fatihah does not adhere to any religion requiring, encouraging, or even allowing the murder of a fellow human being.”
Does that put Islam itself on trial in this matter?
Mark Swan says
Yep
jihad3tracker says
Hello tilde and Mark —- YES, ITEM #35 IN THE STATEMENT OF FACTS DOES PUT ISLAM ON TRIAL IN THIS MATTER. The foundation for that is in plaintiff’s #12 statement. Let’s call it admission of contextual derivative intent.
Even the master litigator David Boies — who never accepted a client for less than a cool million up front — could not win this case. We are in for a very amusing ride: ACLU America-haters did not do proper research because they knew pathological carnage is Allah’s message.
Mark Swan says
jihad3tracker says
February 19, 2016 at 5:53 pm
Thanks for the link
Bezelel says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbVYHpcZO3g
The right way
jihad3tracker says
++++++++ EXCELLENT & HILARIOUS, DUDE ! ! ! ++++++++
Unfortunately, I cannot afford that guy’s $$$$$ tactical rig, so I settled instead for a Ruger SR-40C, a Taurus 901, and a Ruger 10/22 topped by a 2X7 scope, with two fifty round banana mags.
BTW, about 25 years ago, at two large-chain supermarkets in my East-Coast metropolitan area, all of a sudden goat meat appeared alongside of the usual beef and chicken. I was relatively young and a typical chance-taking male, but somehow never assembled the courage and curiosity to try eating it.
Rev g says
AR-15 prices are pretty low these days, and ammo prices are good too. You can save a few bucks if you buy a lower and upper separately. Uppers can be bought easily online, since the lower is the serial numbered firearm.
I love the 10-22, and the Marlin Papoose, but more firepower is always useful. The AR is an easy rifle to use and maintain. My wife was afraid of it, until she pulled the trigger. Now she owns one, and is quite proficient.
gungadin says
Bezelel….I too LMAO on that You Tube video you provided and will spread the word to one and all !!! GREAT to hear and see like minded Americans !!
Julie says
OMG that is hilarious!! Sent it to my son who is about to graduate from Norwich military school.
Angemon says
That was HILARIOUS! Thanks for sharing, Bezelel 😀
GinnyLee says
“Fatihah was born and raised in Tulsa and at least six generations of his family have called Oklahoma home.”
And, I’ll bet that not one in those generations ever had a desire to be a Muslim.
“But the transaction was never completed because as soon as I identified myself as Muslim, things took a frightening turn.”
So, why did you ID yourself, knowing that the sign said “no Muslims”? Why wouldn’t they suspect you of some Muslim terror act, like so many have been doing?
Mark Swan says
The Neals handled this situation well enough…this is an obvious assault on the sign…Fatihah said he chose to try to use the range precisely because of the sign and to quash stereotypes of Muslims…He’s a CAIR jab at the sign.
I know the area Oktaha, Oklahoma…mostly Ranchers…very rural…folks around there are
Descendants of Indian and Cowboy…just regular folks…I’ve bought Horses there twice…did not notice anything particular of the area…but Folks there may feel the same way most in the Mid and South West feel…If You Ride With an Outlaw…You Hang With An Outlaw.
This Ol Boy looked to be itchin for a scrap…come in on a bad day in a bad way…well armed…
and ready to stir it up…I reckon so…so the Ol Boy at the Gun Place…called it right…He checked His background…which He would have done on any applicant…the applicant was revealed to be affiliated
with CAIR…a rascal …Okies take Gun safety very serious….He was Showed the Door…nuf sed.
Look at the weapon of choice here…the infamous AK 47…preferred weapon of the enemy…think this was not completely staged and or rehearsed by CAIR…Think they did not let the ACLU in on this…Think this is not a tightening of the net on signs.
This may make it to the Supreme Court…I like signs…silly as they are…reminds Me of old Route 66.
Don’t Know…might make a legal precedent on signs…might not.
Signs Might Become a Big Fad if they Push This Thing.
Donovan Nuera says
He probably had never fired his “assault” rifle before and only learned how to put the magazine in by watching Jihadi videos after mosque got out the Friday before. He probably had never been to a gun range before as previously mentioned above; you can’t just show up with a loaded gun (Gun Range 101). In the rain??? Where did he purchase his rifle? Is he a convert?
Carolyne says
And by the time if reaches the Supreme Court, if it does, Obama will have packed the court with liberal Islam-loving, American-hating judges who will abolish the First Amendment and the Second Amendment and Obama and his Muslim co-religionists will have won. The prize, the United States of America, will be theirs.
Oppressaphobe says
I believe that’s the plan. After the strange circumstances of Scalia: far away from home at the resort of a big Obama donor (poindexter) who Obama awarded, leaves dinner at 9 pm and is dead the next morning.
No autopsy was done, no medical examiner, family wants NO investigation, on and on and on…
This is a scenario that has played out before. A caller on savage explains how the same thing happened to his father, at a plush resort, they cremated the body before the family was contacted and he believes his father was poisoned. His father happened to have some goods on politicians in California.
So whatever. If people are willing to trust the likes of Cinderella Guavara, who am I to question.
But question I do because the stakes are very high and the circumstances are too convenient.
Autopsy would have settled the issue. But why wasn’t it done. That’s the question that history will record.
Angemon says
Oppressaphobe posted:
“If people are willing to trust the likes of Cinderella Guavara, who am I to question.”
Cinderalla Guevara sounds like the name of a communist bedtime story…
Donovan Nuera says
In Churches, we have pews.
In mosques, they have pew-pew-pew-pew-pew-pew-pew-pew!!!
DaveJ says
It is all part of the Koranic Plan – a continuous testing and taunting of the social, civil and criminal laws & conventions of the host. Clock boy was just one of many fraudulent All (ah) the better to advance the introduction of Sharia law and Islamization, don’t you know.
None dare call it treason (well not many).
Many thanks to Robert, his assistants and to all (well most) of the well spoken comment’rs we have here.
DaveJ says
insert “taunts.” after “fraudulent”.
tom says
i hope they have video and can sue Cair for false inditment once again.
brenrod says
the only solution is to ban muslim immigration and profile muslims in the USA. Deporting those using US law to bring down the US. Trump is the only leader who says the problem is the muslims, and he is right.
Oppressaphobe says
Haven’t there been fatwahs issued that called for shooting up of gun ranges?
It seems I heard that, included in a list of army reserve offices, military bases, police stations, etc…
Does anybody remember, because if a fatwah was issued for gun ranges, and then this dude shows up loaded for infidels,…well…Jimmy?
Oppressaphobe says
I can’t find it online yet, but I am certain I remember hearing of it because I remember thinking why would they attack a gun range?
There are a couple of ideas that have occurred to me as anti-terrorism tactics that people could employ:
One is to limit the number of children that immigrants (or perhaps the general population) could have to two, which is the going western family size anyway. Cair would call this islamophobic and of course the UN would have to jump in but I think it is a worthy and necessary consideration.
Another is to take back the immigration process from the federal government to the people. You’ll notice that nobody knows anything about immigration policy, laws, etc.. I think that is deliberate because the government (and thus the corporate interests, plus the churches, etc..) wants to regulate the flow in the way that suits them, side-stepping the American (German, or other nations) people.
I don’t know why this has never been challenged by the people of the United States. I think it’s psychological. They have used psychological warfare on the people to stop them from trying to control immigration. That’s how you get terms like islamophobia (a really stupid word and concept) in the first place. We have to shake off this idea that governments get to control our populations, based on what? They damned well better be able to tell us why they are controlling, and we better like the reason too!!
On the topic of psychological warfare, we have to wonder why all the beheading videos show people that are completely submissive. There is a reason for that and it is the psychological warfare that these people engage in all the time. The purpose of those videos is to instill fear, and to promote submissiveness. If we saw them cursing and fighting, then that’s more likely how we would respond in the same situation.
So then you have to ask yourself if you are being psychologically whipped by islam in your everyday life. When we cower in fear of expressing our opinions on matters from indoctrination to killings, then we are being psychologically cowwed by islam, or it may be the government itself that is intimidating and silencing our natural and healthy skepticism and instincts for self-survival.
Florida Jim says
Muslims are known for using the laws of a free country against them to promote muslim interest CAIR is used as a hammer to beat down any who oppose and call the “islamophobic”They have practiced this tactic worldwide and only strong nations will stand up to them Democrats fold like pansies.
Oppressaphobe says
Are YOU being Mussie-whipped?
ninetyninepct says
Muslims never smile. Are they so unhappy because of Islam? I sure would be.
Oppressaphobe says
Jesus talked about the Pharisees and the Saducees; the pious religious elite of the day.
When they fasted they wouldn’t smile so as to appear holy. Jesus rebuked the holier than thou crap. They were also very legalistic, like those that are stoning woman alive because of the Alla and the Law.
Our sunday school teacher called them the Sad-you-sees.
abad says
Muslims really need to stop coming to the United States if they hate us so much.
They can and should stay at home in the Middle East.
Daisy says
Rubio tonight is blaming Trump for this, but we are all blaming Obama for not vetting the Syrian refugees! That goes to show Rubio is desperate. If he was nicer and not on the attack, people might consider him as President, but he burned himself.