• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

The Case of Mohammed and Aisha — on The Glazov Gang

Feb 19, 2016 5:08 am By Jamie Glazov

A recent bill in Pakistan sought to ban child marriage, but it miserably failed — after a prominent religious body declared the legislation “un-Islamic.” The UN also recently voiced alarm at the growing number of forced child marriages in Iran. The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child denounced laws permitting sexual intercourse with girls as young as nine — and it urged Iran to “repeal all legal provisions that authorize, condone or lead to child sexual abuse.”

In response to these developments, The Glazov Gang is running its special episode with Louis Lionheart, a scholar of Islam who came on the show to discuss The Case of Mohammed and Aisha, dealing with the prophet of Islam’s marriage to a 6-year-old girl, and his “consummation” of that marriage when she was 9. Louis discusses the Islamic theology and texts that describe this marriage and how the Islamic and non-Islamic world has dealt, and not dealt, with the Islamic reality of this case.

Don’t miss it!

And make sure to watch Louis on the other special Glazov Gang episode, Muslim Woman Attacks Christian Preacher, in which he shares the assault he suffered when he dared to tell the truth about Mohammed and Aisha on 3rd. St. Promenade. (Video clip of the assault is played in the program): CLICK HERE.

[Important Announcement: The Glazov Gang is a fan-generated program and its life extension is growing short. Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help keep us alive. We so appreciate it.]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Sharia Tagged With: Glazov Gang


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 6:06 am

    IT IS SIMPLY THE IRONY OF HALF PORN BOOK ‘SAHEEH BOKHARI’ WHICH HAS GREAT REPUTATION AMONG MAJORITY THAT MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE IT AS A GOSPEL TRUTH THAT AYESHA WAS 6-9 AT MARRIAGE & CONSUMMATION .THE RESEARCHED FACT IS THIS THAT SHE WAS MARRIED TO JABIR IBNE MUTEEM WHO REFUSED HER TO TAKE HER HOME WHEN HER FATHER WATENTED TO MIGRATE TO ETHIOPIA . HE WAS VERY MUCH WORRIED OF HER FUTURE AS TO WHO WILL NOW MARRY A POCK MARKED UGLY DARK SKINNED GIRL OF AROUND 20 YRS ALREADY . TO MITIGATE THE NEO MUSLIM ABU BAKR’S SERIOUS PROBLEM , THE RASOOL(s) IN HIS UTMOST COMPASSION DID OBLIDGED TO TAKE HER IN HIS ONE OF THE SEVERAL POLITICAL MARRIAGES WHICH OTHERWISE HE NEEDED TO PROPAGATE ISLAM AMONG LADIES .SHE WAS IN FACT 21 BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN 20 WHEN SHE CAME INTO THE NIKAH OF MOHAMMAD (saawaws) .THIS FALSE & FABRICATED STORY OF 6-9 IS THE MAIN SOURCE OF RADICULE & HUMMILITION THE TRUE MUSLIMS HAVE TO FACE BECAUSE OF THESE AND MANY OTHER FALSE STORIES WHICH ARE THE PART & PARCEL OF THIS BOOK.

    • ICH says

      Feb 19, 2016 at 6:30 am

      Zaheer you should go on this show then and refute the claim.
      Its seems to me there is a huge darkness in Islam.

      Compared to Jesus , Muhammed seems like Satan.

      Let us know when you get your spot on the debate.

      Prove us wrong.

    • Mo says

      Feb 19, 2016 at 8:46 am

      @ ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN

      “IT IS SIMPLY THE IRONY OF HALF PORN BOOK ‘SAHEEH BOKHARI’ WHICH HAS GREAT REPUTATION AMONG MAJORITY THAT MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE IT AS A GOSPEL TRUTH THAT AYESHA WAS 6-9 AT MARRIAGE & CONSUMMATION .”

      First of all, stop screaming at us in all CAPS. Learn how to speak to people in a civilized manner when you come to their space on the internet.

      “half porn book” – Yes, the fact of an old man having sex with a 9 year old child is indeed pornography. And yet this is accepted as an authoritative Islamic text.

      What do you have to say about that fact?

      • Jerry says

        Feb 19, 2016 at 1:17 pm

        It just happens that Ayesha was with the Plunderer for Profit (P.ss Be Upon Him) for a whole ten years after her “Marriage” was allegedly “consummated”, yet never had children either with him, or after his death, with anyone else.

        This tends to support the contention that he had already “consummated” the “Marriage” when she was six years old, and have so badly mutilated her internally so that she could never have any children.

        So much for the “Holley” paedophile.

        • tilda says

          Feb 20, 2016 at 9:26 pm

          There’s something about Mohammed’s marriages that doesn’t add up.

          He supposedly had about 6 children by his 1st wife (Khadija). He then went on to acquire numerous wives and sex slaves, only one of whom (Mary the Copt) is said to have had a child. (There must be a question as to whether Mohammed was the father.)

          Marriage practices in pre-Muslim Arabia varied — some women had more than one husband at the same time. In that situation, any children the woman had were children of all her husbands. I sometimes wonder whether Khadija had more than one husband at the same time, and which might explain Mohammed’s sudden loss of fertility.

          Although Khadija is said to have been a ‘wealthy widow’ it seems that one of her ‘earlier’ husbands might have been still living at the time of the battle of Badr.

          It’s all very strange.

    • Angemon says

      Feb 19, 2016 at 9:36 am

      ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN posted:

      “THE RESEARCHED FACT ”

      By whom and where?

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 20, 2016 at 4:00 am

      Meretricious Muslim apologist ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN wrote:

      IT IS SIMPLY THE IRONY OF HALF PORN BOOK ‘SAHEEH BOKHARI’ WHICH HAS GREAT REPUTATION AMONG MAJORITY THAT MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE IT AS A GOSPEL TRUTH THAT AYESHA WAS 6-9 AT MARRIAGE & CONSUMMATION .THE RESEARCHED FACT IS THIS THAT SHE WAS MARRIED TO JABIR IBNE MUTEEM WHO REFUSED HER TO TAKE HER HOME WHEN HER FATHER WATENTED TO MIGRATE TO ETHIOPIA . HE WAS VERY MUCH WORRIED OF HER FUTURE AS TO WHO WILL NOW MARRY A POCK MARKED UGLY DARK SKINNED GIRL OF AROUND 20 YRS ALREADY …
      …………………………….

      Where to start? Firstly, shouldn’t ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN be taking this up with his pious coreligionists who all believe that Aisha was just nine? After all, it isn’t the good Infidels at Jihad Watch who are marrying third graders–just pedophile Muslims.

      Moreover, there is not a single Islamic text that says she ever married Jubayr ibn Mut‘im–instead, it says she was engaged to him, but that the engagement was broken when the “Prophet” made his interest in the little prepubescent child clear.

      And then, it is odd that for someone trying to make the case that no one would engage in child marriage that he denigrates a young woman of just twenty as a “pock marked ugly dark skinned” woman.

      Where he got this last is anyone’s guess–it is not in any Islamic texts, either.

      In fact, the story about Muhammed reluctantly marrying an unattractive older woman applies to Sawda bint Zamʿa, whom he married after Khadija’s death, not to Aisha.

      More:

      THIS FALSE & FABRICATED STORY OF 6-9 IS THE MAIN SOURCE OF RADICULE & HUMMILITION THE TRUE MUSLIMS HAVE TO FACE
      …………………………….

      Not really–no one would much care what was in the Hadith if Muslims weren’t engaging in widespread pedophilia *right now*, destroying the lives of countless young girls on the model of the “Prophet”.

      • t. says

        Mar 9, 2016 at 4:02 pm

        What an answer you gave to that deceiver!

        gravenimage, that’s what is called the power of knowledge.

    • BC says

      Feb 20, 2016 at 6:27 am

      If it is false as you claim why is it that those clerics against the ban on child marriage always refer to it as their justification ? This was also the case in Bangladesh
      No less a cleric than Khomeini used the example of Mohammad. Are you suggesting that Khomeini did not know about its falseness?
      What egregious nonsense

  2. Sonja says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 6:45 am

    In the hadith Aisha herself says that she was 9 years old. It is also said that she played with her dolls. I doubt a twenty years old would still play with dolls.

    But the whole thing is always brought up by muslims that the age is not correct. Well; if that is the case, stop child marriage, stop saying that laws that say that a legal (Pakistan) ban of child marriage is unislamic.

    Every time the ugly truth about islam comes out, muslims call these things unislamic or people don’t understand the true islam. Well than act differently instead of cursing other people! Stop child marriage, stop genital mutulation, stop stoning women to death.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 20, 2016 at 4:17 am

      So true, Sonja.

  3. ICH says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 6:48 am

    Are there any Muslims who would like to shed light on this?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGOnGqEpQCc

    seems the “norm” is sex at any age the man chooses

  4. Sonja says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 6:48 am

    Stephanie, Thank you for all your information!!!!

  5. ICH says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 7:01 am

    Watching the video I realized just how unhinged followers of Muhammed are.
    You would think as a woman she would be even more concerned.

    As long as everything goes their way they are fine.
    They get to complain and play the victim card.

    But I would never want to punch someone over street preaching.
    Walk away !
    Turn the other cheek.

    Do the same thing we ALL have to do when we read about Islamic
    atrocities DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY.

    I am very glad the crowd didnt turn on the preacher because of PC

    I think the shock of her punching him made a great impact them.

    • mortimer says

      Feb 19, 2016 at 10:04 am

      One cannot admire Mohammed the pedophile and be psychologically well.

    • Truth says

      Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 am

      I don’t turn the other cheek, I fight.

  6. mortimer says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 10:01 am

    Bukhari:V4B52N211 “I participated in a Ghazwa [raid] with the Prophet. I said, ‘Apostle, I am a bridegroom.’ He asked me whether I had married a virgin or matron. I answered, ‘A matron.’ He said, ‘Why not a virgin who would have played with you? Then you could have played with her.’ ‘Apostle! My father was martyred and I have some young sisters, so I felt it not proper that I should marry a young girl as young as them.’”

    (Comment: Not all Mohammed’s followers thought sex with children was alright!)

  7. David says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 10:04 am

    It’s all just further proff that the entire muslim “religion”, is nothing but a SATANIC COUNTERFEIT! GOD, as known by sane and thinking people, had nothing to do with it!
    It is sad, but this is a definite SIGN that we are now living in; “The End Times”, spoken of in the HOLY BIBLE. More and more people are joining with the worshippers of SATAN. And taking a stand against the ONE TRUE GOD!
    Sorry. I don’t mean to preach. I just want to EDUCATE our readers as to the great truth driving world events. It is shocking to just watch the daily news! And I’ve been a news junky since the days of Walter Cronkite and “Chet Huntly and David Brinkly”!
    This is not the same country that I grew up in. Nor is it the same World! Those of you over the age of, say 45-50 must know exactly what I’m talking about.
    Today many folks are preparing to survive, what they see as, a coming holocaust. Bomb shelters, some built in the 50’s or 60’s, are being cleaned up, renovated and stocked with supplies! Many think that, such “prepers” are just NUTS or peronoid. I think that they are just showing WISDOM.

  8. Ginger says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 10:12 am

    It seems that the leaders of any wacky cult you care to name have their brains in their genitals.

  9. Wakeup says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 10:39 am

    9 lunar years is even less than 9 years more creepy. Surely this issue must raise questions in the minds of all muslims.

  10. Jay Boo says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 12:46 pm

    Who are we to believe? The folks at CAIR
    Muslims in Muslim majority countries say YES this is the example to follow.
    “The prophet of Islam’s marriage to a 6-year-old girl, and his “consummation” of that marriage when she was 9”

    Shame on Muslims.
    How dare they call someone like Muhammad a prophet.

  11. wallace says

    Feb 19, 2016 at 4:27 pm

    The same Islamic religious body had previously opposed a law that would allow d.n.a testing to be made admissable in rape cases. It found it conflicted with the sharia mandate that a woman or girl claiming rape required 4 male pious Muslims to support her claim.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • iconoclast123 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Brando on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Boycott Turkey on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.