• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

What you can do to stop the blocking of jihad news on Facebook

Feb 7, 2016 9:06 am By marc

block-message-FBWell, the short answer is just tell them they are wrong. They will review, and often they will remove the block. But first you need to find out what they objected to. The post itself is usually not what they are blocking, but the initial block message will tell you it is some image that is “unsafe.” Just click the button offered “If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know.” In this case, I told them: “It is a benign image, used widely by the press regarding a recent news story; there is no threat. I believe it is being mass reported for political reasons to stifle free speech.”

In this case, I was alerted to the issue because the post “auto-posted” as normal, and I was emailed the error message: “Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.” The content itself is benign, just regular news from Europe. An article from a mainstream newspaper, with an editorial by Robert Spencer: no threats, nothing that could possibly construed as “hate speech,” and nothing in any way abusive.

The appropriately named “Muslim-rape-gang.jpg” is what is causing the whole post to be blocked.

What is happening here is that with the Left’s and Muslims’ continual effort to block free speech, they have hit a roadblock with their cyber attacks, and in a quite organised way they are mass reporting images on Facebook. This particular image was previously shared in counter-jihad and current event groups and pages, and they just hit the report button en masse, reporting it as being malicious in some way (there are a few options).

I have also seen reports where the warning was “The content you’re trying to share includes a link that our security systems detected to be unsafe,” and yes, some image files themselves can be malicious. There are methods to check images; again, just let Facebook know.

Yes, Facebook have been proven to show extreme bias. This recent experiment exposed some inexcusable anti-Israel bias, but Facebook did back down and removed the anti-Israel page. If we keep on top of them, they might actually lose the bias, or at least lessen it.

But this blocking we are seeing is not a case of bias. It is our enemy leveraging Facebook’s reporting system. Our enemy is very well organised. A huge “army” get together every Friday afternoon and discuss things such as cursing the unbeliever, ordering their women folk to dress “modestly,” and ways of making Islam look better. They also have groups on Facebook where they discuss which other groups and pages to target.

But everyone can fight back. Where you see something benign (not malicious or containing hate speech in any way) being blocked, tell Facebook. Apart from inducing them to “release” the blocked content, this will have another effect: when their automated systems and staff see the same accounts making false reports, they will start ignoring them.

Free speech is certainly coming under accelerated attack from all directions, and the traditional protectors of free speech, the press, are mostly not on our side, as we saw in Cologne earlier this year. But we can all do something about it. In another case, this site (Jihad Watch) is blocked on Reddit in Europe. I looked into it, I can’t find evidence that the moderator is a Muslim, but he is certainly anti-Jihad Watch, and has a “make Muslims look good whatever they do” agenda. It’s not Reddit itself doing it. They are great. I am active in some security pages myself. Reddit is run by volunteer moderators: if we don’t get involved. nothing will change.

The enemy has armies of technically able people. I guess living on state benefits in the West, able to spend their time doing stuff like this, which puts us as a disadvantage. Most of us who are technically able have to work for a living and fund them with our taxes.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: free speech Tagged With: Facebook, Reddit


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Miao Zedong says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 10:06 am

    I experienced first hand on Amazon the power of false reporting inconveient truth as “breech of community standards”. The left uses the same slandering tactics as the islamofascists. Aparently the same is going on in Wiki.

    • marc says

      Feb 7, 2016 at 11:09 am

      Wikipedia is like Reddit, volunteer moderators, if we got more involved there, we could control the narrative better.

    • Sodacrackers2 says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 6:21 am

      First time ever, I received a notice that Pamela Geller’s site is being blocked because of hate speech, violence, and something else I have forgotten. I used the form to send back to them why this was not correct; also sent one to Pamela telling her about it. So very Orwellian and discouraging.

  2. Renee says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 10:33 am

    I stopped using Facebook after it blocked a post from a German girl pointing out how the refugees (to be precise, not all refugees) were assaulting and raping women. Facebook is just for pictures of cakes, holidays, bubbles, peaches and cream. Not for any real world facts of importance. Therefore, because Facebook only can face superficial stuff and trivia, I closed the book. Wish someone would start a similar site where real news can be posted by users.

  3. Richie says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 10:44 am

    Im afraid its only a matter of time before Facebook takes down the Jihad Watch Facebook page. Apparently any criticism or discussion of the actions of violent Muslims is not allowed in leftist run society, but open hatred of Christains and Jews is encouraged

    • Donna says

      Feb 14, 2016 at 3:56 am

      We as Americans have a right to know what those people are up to, since our lives and safety are important… I have no idea how much Obama could possibly be paying Zuckerberg to turn his back on his fellow Americans and turn to the side of the Enemy.. But I do know money talks.. But I couldn’t sell out my own people for money, If I had the money he’s made off of Facebook… I hope he realizes that those crazy ISIS groups members would think nothing of raping his wife and new baby girl… It makes them Powerful they claim to rape and American female… I’m just sadden by Zuckerberg’s lack of care for his own people and their safety…

  4. wtd says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 11:20 am

    Quote: “The appropriately named “Muslim-rape-gang.jpg” is what is causing the whole post to be blocked.”

    I don’t use facebook, but wonder if this can be avoided by inserting a tiny.url in place of the “muslim-rape-gang.jpg”. You would still get to the link but the identifying text would be masked.

    For instance, this thread’s url inserted @ tinyurl.com … http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/what-you-can-do-to-stop-the-blocking-of-jihad-news-on-facebook

    is converted to….. http://tinyurl.com/jgsv36e

    effectively eliminating any identifying ‘trigger’ words simplifying efforts for these anti-1A Censors

    • marc says

      Feb 7, 2016 at 11:29 am

      That will work in some cases, but not where it is the actual image is what is blacklisted, renaming image wont work, they know how the image “looks”, they even have face recognition. First I thought they were using a hash of the file, but i renamed and changed to a different file format, and they still blocked it. By reporting the image as safe to Facebook, countless other FB groups and blogs will be better off when they also go to share it.

  5. grace says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Well I had a temporary block from fb, but a few weeks late my page was disabled because I shared a cartoon that had been posted. It was accurate but anti islamic. I have since not tried to return to fb, because I don’t think we should support it as it is biocking the truth about islam.

    • marc says

      Feb 7, 2016 at 12:27 pm

      Again, the image was likely mass reported after you had posted it, do you have a link to it somewhere? we can check if thats the case using their debug tool here https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug

  6. Louis says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 1:14 pm

    All over western world the media is being controlled by governments. There is no longer free speech.

    • billybob says

      Feb 7, 2016 at 1:49 pm

      There is no longer free speech he says, on a site that is a celebration of free speech. The point I am making is that the media is getting left behind as we move out onto the internet at large to get our information. I spend more time on sites such as this one, following links contributed by commenters, and at the places those links lead, than I do reading the mainstream media. I also read Google News, where you can pop up dozens of journals all over the world for every news item, and thereby get coverage from every conceivable angle. Beyond that, the various well known biases of of leading media in themselves are very informative of what, for example, the Republicans want to to believe or what the Democrats want you to believe, or what various industries want you to believe. This is useful information in itself.

      So far, we still have free speech. But recent trends are very worrisome. It seems in Europe these days, you increasingly need to be careful of what you say about the refugees for example, or you could run up against hate speech laws. Just look at the Netherlands where Geert Wilders is facing prosecution for asking “do we want more immigrants from Morocco or less?”. I know if Obama had his way we could get prosecuted for “insulting the Prophet of Islam” (may he be eternally sodomized by goats – and I still have the freedom to say that!).

      We need to ever more effectively and articulately communicate the message about the Islam being the only religion that advocates a vile, oppressive, supremacist ideology promoted and defended by violence while we still can.

  7. Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 2:30 pm

    Geert Wilders is facing prosecution for asking “do we want more immigrants from Morocco or less?”.

    This is a revolting statement.
    https://ukgovernmentwatch.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/the-pedants-revolt.jpg

  8. James n says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 4:00 pm

    It’s not just Facebook… I get a notification for each new article or post by email but I can only go to the actual website when using wifi. If I try when on 4g my service provider (o2 ) blocks me with a message that this website is for over 18s only and demands my credit card details. To change this I will have to phone o2 and point out the error, and I don’t much fancy explaining to some clueless call centre operator why I want to visit a website called jihad watch. Anyone who visits this site knows the truth, but trying to explain the site can be a little tricky to those who are a little more brain washed by liberal media.

    • marc says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 12:05 am

      Yes the UK have been doing this for a long time, and all CJ sites are being falsely labeled as adult to put people off.
      Any numbers of proxies will work, such as https://hide.me/en/proxy which is free. Or a transparent paid service such as http://www.cyberghostvpn.com/ which lets you install an app.
      Some blocking can be easily circumvented by changing your DNS to use something like 8.8.8.8 instead of the operators, but I don’t think that will work with O2.

  9. Karen says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 4:03 pm

    Interesting article with great advice. One addition; in annual country rankings, many EU countries receive high marks for government transparency and freedom of the press. This should be rethought in light of the active cover ups that took place by police, government and media to suppress information about the NYear assaults by Muslim refugees. A quick look at several EU Reddit sites reveals no mention of the assults. User disinterest, or moderator censorship?

  10. Peter Buckley says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Douglas Murray wrote a recent article on exactly the same topic:

    http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7371/facebook-freedom-of-speech

    • billybob says

      Feb 7, 2016 at 5:43 pm

      “Angela Merkel met Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook at a UN development summit in New York. As they sat down, Chancellor Merkel’s microphone, still on, recorded Merkel asking Zuckerberg what could be done to stop anti-immigration postings being written on Facebook. She asked if it was something he was working on, and he assured her it was.”

      …and it gets worse. This is scary stuff. We see all over the world leaders begin to restrict free speech when people don’t like their policies. The first thing to go is social media. Look at Turkey, for example. Awhile back when Erdogan was being accused of corruption by the opposition who had posted evidence on YouTube, first thing he did was ban YouTube.

      • Angemon says

        Feb 7, 2016 at 7:11 pm

        Merkel’s more insidious than that. Rather than blocking “offending” social media, she’s working with said social media to block any opposing view. Erdogan may be a wannabe tin-pot dictator but he doesn’t try to hide it. Merkel? She smiles while serving you a cup of poisoned tea.

      • marc says

        Feb 7, 2016 at 11:24 pm

        Yes we have a major issue there, FaceBook are quickly taking down anything reported as “hate speech” not even checking the accuracy of the reports, until you notify them they have made a mistake, benign images such as those found here and other Counter Jihad share, are being miss reported, when you notify them they made a mistake, often they reverse the block.

      • quotha raven says

        Feb 8, 2016 at 3:09 pm

        to Billy Bob – Very good observations, BB, in both your comments, and demonstrative of chilling movement in the direction of censorship. I remember reading what you quote (was it here at JW? I can’t remember):

        “Angela Merkel met Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook at a UN development summit in New York. As they sat down, Chancellor Merkel’s microphone, still on, recorded Merkel asking Zuckerberg what could be done to stop anti-immigration postings being written on Facebook. She asked if it was something he was working on, and he assured her it was.”

        When I originally read that, being cynical about Facebook to begin with, my reaction was “ya THINK???” Somehow, I was not the least bit surprised to read of this unholy alliance between Merkel and Zuckerberg

        There are times when I fervently wish I were less of a luddite than I am, and this is one of them. I try to advance my understanding of today’s technology, esp when it has to do with the issues addressed here, but these efforts usually render me frustrated and tearing my hair out…in part because of the completely deteriorated use of the English language – so COUNTER-INTUITIVE – associated with everything related to technology that intends to communicate or instruct. I could give examples, but enough of this rant!

        Cheers!

        quotha raven

  11. Linde Barrera says

    Feb 7, 2016 at 9:51 pm

    Hi everyone, I am in New Hampshire as a volunteer for Ted Cruz for president. I have spoken about JihadWatch.org to at least 9 other volunteers, so they can read the truth about Islam and what goes on inside Muslim majority countries, as well as what advocates of Sharia law want to bring to the US. I mention your name shamelessly, Robert Spencer.

    • quotha raven says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 3:19 pm

      To Linde Barrera – You GO, GIRL! I am so proud of you.

      I am SO SERIOUS! I remember who you are, your description of who you are, where you live, etc., and I’ve been particularly interested in and attentive to your comments here at JW ever since you first appeared. I’ve always admired your energy and your “can do” attitude, and NOW, look at you!

      YOU GO, GIRL!

      Cheers!

      quotha raven

  12. Lindsay Truman says

    Feb 8, 2016 at 4:15 am

    Just so people know, facebook is also dismantling accounts belonging to pro-Isis individuals (or those perceived as such) and who post things, including videos, that appear pro-Isis. Knowing this, it seems that what is going on is that facebook does not hire people who discriminate between what is intended to be pro-Isis and that which is news ABOUT Isis.

    For example, a pro-Isis person posts a video extolling the virtues of Isis. Someone sees it and reports it. Another person reposts the same video, with the caption “pro-Isis video”, as part of making others aware that such videos are out there. Someone reports it, too.

    Guess who will get the video removed or account shut down?

    BOTH PEOPLE.

    Facebook “monitors” are not hired for their intellect. They’re hired to keep certain forms of content off facebook, regardless of why its there.

    Pro-jihandis have caught on to this. Now they flag their own stuff with the statement: “this is for news and information purposes only”. That simple disclaimer gets things a “pass” on facebook.

    If you must repost videos, articles, photos, etc. about Isis, I highly suggest beginning your post thusly: ALL OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS (whatever it is) IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.

    • Oppressaphobe says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 11:35 am

      Why are we dealing with facebook and not starting our own facebook?

  13. Oppressaphobe says

    Feb 8, 2016 at 8:20 am

    UNAOC is certainly waging a global campaign to destroy free speech with their #spreadnohate hashtag.and their conference:

    Tracking Hatred: An international dialogue on HATE SPEECH in the media.

    It’s very existence is designed to dampen any resolve of ordinary people who actually have to live in the world that they are creating on their little keyboards with their starbucks next to them.

    They don’t live or work in the real world and are completely out of touch and this is as much of the problem as the political divide. It’s also an economic divide.

    But they would never want anyone to portray them as elites, because that points the problem back at THEM. They want it pointed at US.

    You have to change the narrative with these people. If you engage in their campaign, you lose because they set the rules. You can’t beat them at their own game, you have to play a new game and that is to expose them as being elites who have no interaction in the day to day life of ordinary working class people.

    Their daughters are not living near the refugees and being assaulted. Their values aren’t under attack like Christianity, because they have no values to attack.

    This is what needs to be said. They want to make it about race:

    IT’S REALLY ABOUT CLASS: THEY ARE ELITES.

    That is at the root of the problem and let them deny that they are the protected upper crust, not simply nice and tolerant people, so much more enlightened than you are.

  14. quotha raven says

    Feb 8, 2016 at 2:18 pm

    To Marc – Thanks for a very informative and well-written article. And for your “behind the scene” efforts and help, as well. Your expertise is impressive for such a characteristically quiet guy.

    I have always had creepy feelings and a bit of paranoia about Facebook, its intentions and the way it has contributed so significantly to social engineering.

    Cheers!

    quotha raven

    • marc says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 2:37 pm

      Yes, some element of big brother there, but we have an audience that need educating on FaceBook.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Feb 9, 2016 at 1:22 am

        Yes. It has its uses. One way to limit harm is to be very, very careful about how ‘public’ you are – who can see your postings – and about the number and type of people you accept as Friends.

        The ONLY people I accept as Friends are 1/ actual blood relatives (nearly all of whom I have met face to face) or in-laws (i.e persons married to said relatives, whom I have also usually met) and 2/ persons who are *already* my friends in real-life (i.e. face-to face) and/ or ‘colleagues’ of some kind, e.g. members of the church to which I belong or to which I belonged in the past and whom I knew fairly well at the time. There are a *few* – and I mean few – exceptions to that rule – for example, a lovely Jewish lady I met at a pro-Israel demo, we struck up acquaintance, exchanged FB addresses, she has since made aliyah, and we keep up on FB… which means I get all the jihad news from Israel, as it happens, hot off the press (sometimes, almost before it hits the press…). I don’t accept friends-of-friends-of-friends, not even when they seem quite nice, because it’s just overload. In fact, if I get a friend request from someone I don’t personally know I reject it. And one must refuse the temptation to weary people with ‘Too Much Information”, and refuse to clutter one’s newsfeed with too many ‘shares’.

        I see FB as a cross between putting things up on a public bulletin-board, and sending postcards. Brief, light, and breezy; but for keeping up with a widely-scattered extended family/ tribe/ clan it really has been a tremendous boon.

        Even so, even despite the limits I’ve set, I can totally agree about the ‘audience that need educating’.

        The thing is: the people I *am* friended with (i.e. who are my friends-and-relations) mostly do not have a clue about Islam. *Some* do. Some are on the same page as I am. Some alas are utterly clueless and dangerously Islamophile and currently refusing to listen to reason and facts. Some are quite educable. But *because* they all know me in *real life* and because they seem to generally find my ‘FB-typical’ postings – which are mostly on fairly non-controversial ‘general interest’ subjects, or to subjects on which they and I *agree*, such as the small doings of our extended family, church, etc – of interest, they then have to deal, every now and again, with the occasional posting, comment or judiciously-selected ‘shared’ item that involves a critical view of Islam and a bit of hard information about it. And none of them have de-friended me yet!

        My advice to fellow FB users… “seed” your newsfeed but don’t flood it. Be very selective about *which* items of Jihad News or Information About Islam you choose to make public to your FB acquaintance.

  15. quotha raven says

    Feb 8, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    To Marc, who sez “But everyone can fight back. Where you see something benign (not malicious or containing hate speech in any way) being blocked, tell Facebook. Apart from inducing them to “release” the blocked content, this will have another effect: when their automated systems and staff see the same accounts making false reports, they will start ignoring them.”

    I haven’t read the comments here yet, Marc, so you may already have answered my question. But in response to the bit of your article copied here, how can one alert Facebook or complain that an image or post is benign when one is prohibited (via the block) from seeing the actual content?

    I would like to participate in informing Facebook of the error of its ways.

    Cheers!

    quotha raven

    • marc says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 2:46 pm

      If you go to share this image:
      http://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Muslim-rape-gang.jpg
      right now on facebook you get a warning:
      “You can’t post this because it has a blocked link
      The content you’re trying to share includes a link that our security systems detected to be unsafe:
      http://jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/muslim-rape-gang.jpg
      Please remove this link to continue.
      If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know.”
      just click “please let us know” and let them know why.

      http://www.raymondibrahim.com/2016/02/04/the-islamic-rape-and-murder-of-christian-boys/
      was also recently blocked with a similar message, citing:
      http://www.raymondibrahim.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/vh-e1454605031967.jpg
      as being the “abusive image”, i let them know they were wrong, 3 days later they removed the block, and you can now share the post. (the image itself is still blocked if you try to share it manually).

      I belive this labeling of images as abusive, and i have seen them imply they are malicious is very misleading and a story in itself.

      • quotha raven says

        Feb 8, 2016 at 3:27 pm

        to Marc -Merci! I will print this and do it. Cheers! qr

  16. Henry jones says

    Feb 8, 2016 at 3:14 pm

    Didn’t you mention the same thing regarding A/V, and confused website hosting vs a customer?

    I don’t post much but I’ve never had Facebook block JW or articles, or link to it. Is it every account or just triggered by frequency?

    • marc says

      Feb 8, 2016 at 9:22 pm

      here’s one from recently. it says unsafe when you went to post, i advised them, they removed the block.

      unsafe-RI

      They are wrongly implying there is malware in the images, when they do, i check them manually for malware, prove them wrong, they clear the block, tedious, but if someone is reporting malware in the images, not much else I can do.
      more details here: https://freespeechdefense.net/2016/01/false-security-warning-on-a-png-file-at-facebook/
      Yes, I’m fighting a losing battle here, but i am very much alone and I am asking here for help.
      differnt version of same image here http://www.raymondibrahim.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/vh-e1454605031967.jpg
      try sharing it on facebook (unless they cleared it already) theres nothing malicious in the image, but they say there is.
      It’s not account related. It’s images that CJ bloggers use from various sources that the savages and their enablers are mass reporting.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Brando on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • Boycott Turkey on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.