“If government laws do not prevent such assaults, then I fear that a day will come where the Muslim community might take matters into their own hands to protect their women and mothers. It is actions like these, and non-strategic rulings that could spark a reaction from the affected families that will result in violence.” He is saying that Muslims must have laws to their liking or they will take the law into their own hands. There will be much, much more of this, in Australia and elsewhere.
“Australian Muslims may resort to violence if headscarf laws not changed, SA imam says,” ABC.net.au, March 22, 2016:
The founder of the fledgling Islamic Association of South Australia (IASA) has warned a lack of tolerance could spark violence, after a man who allegedly grabbed a woman’s headscarf was released on bail.
The imam of IASA, who goes by the name Shaikh M Tawhidi, today released a statement saying he feared a day “where the Muslim community might take matters into their own hands to protect their women and mothers”.
SA Police today arrested and charged a 27-year-old man from Kilburn in Adelaide’s inner-north with assault and offensive behaviour on a passenger vehicle.
They alleged he grabbed a young woman’s headscarf as she got on a bus at Churchill Road on March 16 and intimidated her for the rest of the bus journey into the city.
Police said the woman was not physically injured and the man was bailed to appear in the Elizabeth Magistrates Court on April 18.
Mr Tawhidi said imams were striving “hard to reform the Muslim community of SA into a tolerant community”.
He said the alleged incident on the bus had provoked him to make a statement, warning the Australian Government to review its laws on headscarves.
“Kilburn, Prospect and surrounding areas have a large Muslim population,” said the imam, who arrived in South Australia recently.
“If government laws do not prevent such assaults, then I fear that a day will come where the Muslim community might take matters into their own hands to protect their women and mothers.
“It is actions like these, and non-strategic rulings that could spark a reaction from the affected families that will result in violence.”
Mr Tawhidi founded the association this year and its membership is unknown.. [sic]
A spokesperson for the SA Government said all citizens who were victims of assault “should expect that the perpetrator be punished according to the law”.
“The Government does not condone people taking the law into their own hands,” he said.

Susan B says
Wah Wah Wah!!! Having your headscarf pulled beats being raped for not wearing one.
Stephen says
Send all these Muslims back to the camel’s days 17th century.
Debunk them back to middle east
Get them pledge the truth of Islam
Change the Koran verses which command them to kill, behead n abuse the infidels n innocents.
.
Bamaguje says
Indeed, why is the Imam still in Australia? If he is a citizen, revoke his citizenship and expel him.
He has made an explicit threat for which there should be zero tolerance – “If government laws do not prevent such assaults, then I fear that a day will come where the Muslim community might take matters into their own hands…” – Sheik Tawhidi.
Despite the numerous instances of Muslims raping non-Muslim girls, non-Muslim Australians have never threatened to “take matters into our hands.”
Bob says
The same applies to the Muslim ‘hate-preachers’ in the UK, most of them living on benefits!
ninetyninepct says
Non-muslim Australians should take matters into their own hands today.
Arab scientists have invented a time-travel device that can transport
an entire country back to the middle ages. They’re calling it
“Islam.”
Angemon says
Look at the diaper on his head – definitely a shiite.
Do that. I dare ya. But you better practice for the marathon, because Aussies will go after you for that…
You mean, a “backlash”? That thing that the MSM warns us against, even though they’re oddly silent on this particular case?
Jay Boo says
A diaper can double as a book bag for a Muslim cleric.
Ralph Statum says
https://youtu.be/Jo7ihIRnVXA
Jay Boo says
First off— There is no valid excuse for anyone to take a woman’s headscarf.
Let’s not give the grievance mongers a legitimate gripe.
Rather than remove the headscarf we should remove the pretext for the headscarf.
Shine a light on Islam’s pit of darkness.
Panmelia says
Ban the headscarf, ban the burkha, ban the hijab, ban any form of muslim clothing, male or female.
If they don’t like it, they know where the nearest islamic country is.
gravenimage says
Jay Boo wrote:
First off— There is no valid excuse for anyone to take a woman’s headscarf.
Let’s not give the grievance mongers a legitimate gripe.
……………………..
Who is giving them a legitimate gripe? No one has said it is legal to snatch off an article of clothing from anyone. The perpetrator was arrested and is being prosecuted. This supremacist Muslim took offence at his being released on bail, as anyone in Australia or the rest of the West would be for such a misdemeanor.
It is this Mohammedan demanding that Australia not only hold such people without bail, but also that they change the laws so that it is impossible for anyone to pull off a headscarf, or face Muslim violence.
Since it is impossible to pass any law that will *prevent* crime, this is impossible. This is, in fact, very rare–but cannot be legislated against, any more than any other crime.
So the threat stands on its own.
No Fear says
Ditto. The police are enforcing the laws of Australia by arresting the man who removed the scarf. The man was arrested and released on bail; standard procedure under the law.
Sounds like the IASA want Sharia enforced, not Australian law.
If the IASA start enforcing Sharia then they should be arrested if they break Australian law.
No Fear says
If, for example, a muslim group decided to enforce the Sharia in Australia, surely any other muslim group could just as easily decide to enforce the Sharia in Australia. We could end up with dozens of Sharia enforcing groups in OZ. (I facetiously suggest that) I could even set up MY version of Sharia enforcement and declare all the other groups “kaffirs”. Madness!
gravenimage says
Imposing Shari’ah law is definitely the end game here, No Fear.
“Muslim group wants sharia law in Australia”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-05-17/muslim-group-wants-sharia-law-in-australia/2717096
Jay Boo says
Does this same cleric encourage mobs of Muslim men to grope non-Muslim women.
gravenimage says
Damn good question, Jay Boo.
Angry Aussie says
Yes, a man who grabbed her headscarf was released on bail. So was Australia’s largest ICE distributor who happened to be a Muslim, so was Man Monis, who carried out the Sydney Siege in the Lindt Cafe. He also happened to be a Muslim who wrote obnoxious letters to the families of fallen soldiers, was up on over 40 sexual assault charges, and charges related to the murder of his ex wife. Why shouldn’t the non Muslim have been let out on bail? We have alleged terrorists and supporters of ISIS who walk the streets. People who plot the demise of Australia and it’s citizens. A French man spat in the face if a Muslim who taunted him the week of the Paris attacks. The Muslims wanted him jailed for 5 years. I was spat at by a Muslim and the police weren’t interested. Now, it the guy who had yanked her stupid hijab had pulled it tightly around her throat and caused a problem, I would say yes, he needs to be held accountable . Australians are getting increasingly frustrated at the differences in justice. Favours continually shown to the Muslim community are wearing thin. They scream and the government throws $$$ at them for appeasement. We had riots in Sydney and Melbourne a few weeks ago that were carried out by Sudanese. Machetes, baseball bats and all. What happened? No charges were laid. The Sudanese community threw a tantrum about how they were percieved to be shown in a negative wzy by the media. They shirked all responsibility for their actions and got a government initiative payment of over 2 million. What an absolute joke. Less than 5% of the imported wives are literate. They are a burden on our welfare system. They try to sue anyone who looks in their direction and more often than not the ‘evidence’ is fully manufactured.
Panmelia says
Our Western islamophile leaders are still in denial and still busy trying to square the circle instead of admitting that they were short-sighted, half-witted fools for allowing muzzrats to migrate to our countries to begin with.
Will they wake up before it’s too damn late and Western women are being forced to wear hijabs and to submit to much much worse by muslim men?
Stupidity, complacency and ignorance of what islam is really all about could be the end of civilisation.
It’s a simple equation: islam = fascism. Fascism didn’t claim to be a religion, but an ideology. islam claims to be a religion, but it is not. It is a fascistic political ideology masquerading as a religion.
Leftists, liberals, bleeding heart do-gooders, multiculturalists and naive ‘brotherhood of man’ fantasists are all aiding the fascists by blindly insisting that islam is a religion and should be respected as such.
All the English-speaking first world countries need to unite to fight as they did in WW2.
rabrooks says
It’s kinda evil, but I can’t wait until one of their family members is killed by a terrorist, or one of their daughters or mothers is kidnapped, raped and sold to some dirty old man in another country. Only then will they “demand to take action”.
It’s like obozo care. One law for us, and another for them.
rabrooks says
Well, what will you do? You have surrendered all your firearms, and I can bet that the mudslimes are stockpiling theirs for when that day comes. I can promise you they will not care about your laws.
What the fck are headscarf laws for? I was under the impression they didn’t allow their livestock out without a herder……..
Richard Paulsen says
How come he can claim sharialaws in a democratic developed, civilized nation to which he had fled? What was his reasons for asylum?
Isn´t he a refugee? From what? Since claiming the same as where he came from.
The laws concerning asylum should be revised. Nothing else should. Or change the sharialaws.
px fragonard says
The man was arrested, rightly so, for assault. You can’t put your hands on another human being, except in self-defense. The laws are fine.
One doesn’t need a separate law about headscarves. You can’t assault anyone, any part of their body, or their garments
What this “request” is, is for separate laws, governing the behavior of non-Muslims toward Muslims. But Western law doesn’t recognize special legal status. That’s how we recognize justice: as laws applied equally to rich and poor (in theory) and all socioeconomic conditions.
This threat is the essence of uncivilized behavior. Kick them out of the country.
Panmelia says
One does need a law against headscarves, hijabs, veils , whatever you want to call them – a law to BAN them as offensive to the citizens of democratic nations, especially the liberated women of those nations.
Hijabs are symbols of the subjugation and brainwashing of females by men. They signify that sharia law is being practised in a democratic country where only one rule of law should exist.
Hijabs and burkhas, especially the black bin bag monstrosity that allows only eyes to show, if that, are a political statement of two fingers up at the host country and possibly a statement of support for IS.
France banned the head covering and it is time the UK and every Western country followed suit, with the addition of a ban on the full body burkha for good measure.
No Fear says
NSW law makes it possible for police to ask a muslims to remove her veil/headscarf for identification purposes. It is my opinion that if I have to remove my motorcycle helmet for security reasons then muslims should have to remove their head coverings for security purposes. That is fair. Motorcycling is my religion. “Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance” is my holy text.
Mirren10 says
”Having your headscarf pulled beats being raped for not wearing one.”
Or *murdered*.
I utterly *despise* the mohammedan slave rag, and regard anyone who wears it as my enemy, a mohammedan gang moll (to quote dda’s lovely phrase) who has nailed her colours to the mast, and is effectively saying, ”don’t rape me, rape that uncovered slut over there.”
*But* I don’t remotely condone this lout’s behaviour. And neither did the law. He was **charged with assault (and ‘offensive’ behaviour). Here I take issue with the charge; assault, yes. Offensive behaviour ? Far more problematic. Who decides what is ‘offensive’ ? Was it offensive because she was a mohammedan ? If so, yet another step on the road to dhimmitude.
The man was charged with assault, under the law. He will appear in Court. If found guilty, he will be punished. But. **that is not enough for this mohammedan supremacist**.
“If government laws do not prevent such assaults, then I fear that a day will come where the Muslim community might take matters into their own hands to protect their women and mothers.”
No government law can prevent those who wish to break it, breaking it, as anyone with any commonsense knows. The most that can be hoped for is that the punishment for those who break it will be a sufficient deterrent.
So what this creep is saying, is that if some yahoo yanks off a slave rag, is arrested and punished for assault, and then *another* yahoo comes along and does the same thing, he and his fellow mohammedans will be justified in resorting to violence, which of course, *they* must not be punished for. Typical mohammedan ‘logic’. Blech.
”The founder of the fledgling Islamic Association of South Australia (IASA) has warned a lack of tolerance could spark violence… ”
Well, of course. What could be a more rational response to a lack of tolerance, than violence ? More Islamic ‘logic’.
As Robert cogently notes, what this creep is saying is do what we want or we’ll riot and murder you.
How I loathe, hate, and despise, this foul creed.
The founder of the fledgling Islamic Association of South Australia (IASA) has warned a lack of tolerance could spark violence,
Phobic-ist says
Amen to that
gravenimage says
Excellent post, Mirren.
Jerry says
Yes, a ponytail pull of a headscarf is a serious offense. It’s almost like building a mosque and threatening violence and murder against non-believers and then calling it divine revelation for religious protection.
I Googled Australian law:
359 Threats 359 Threats
(1) A person (the first person) who threatens to cause a detriment to a second person with intent to prevent or hinder any person (the other person) other than the first person from doing any act which the other person is lawfully entitled to do, or with intent to compel the other person to do any act which the other person is lawfully entitled to abstain from doing, or with intent to cause public alarm or anxiety, commits a crime.
—————————————————-
A sample from the islamic faith:
Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.”
Quran (2:244) – “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”
Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.
Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah”
Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
———-
Now throw in all the mass murder of recent decades by muslims for that faith, and by gosh, I think we have a conspiracy on our hands. The outrage isn’t that someone might have tugged a headscarf, the outrage is that we continue to excuse the enemy from responsibility for the terror its causing. And who is the enemy? I believe it is every muslim that lives for, defends, or supports that faith.
Shut down those d*man mosques. Outlaw sharia. Stop muslim immigration.
Jerry says
DustyFae says
March 28, 2016 at 11:26 am
This is so sad https://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/muslim-tutor-murders-an-11-year-old-hindu-boy-for-refusing-to-join-isis/
—————————————-
Sad, but not at all surprising. This is the effect that fake religion is having on the minds of muslims. It turns them into insane animals, and they’re only doing what their prophet and god commands! I almost wish someone would hijack their religion, it could only be an improvement.
Most noteworthy for me, the child had too much good sense to do as the muslim adult wanted. That part breaks my heart. Reminds me of that famous quote:
“Any system of religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be true.” — Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
Without islam’s indoctrination this child had more sense than the “wisest” imam in islam. I know it’s said that “further investigation is under way,” but it’s too consistent with muslim behavior for me to worry about the possibility it’s not true. If this one ain’t true it’s still true a million times elsewhere. This act and thousands like it should compel all decent people of the world to rise against that faith and its corrupting influence.
Just A Concerned Citizen says
So once again, we have the grand scale “good cop/bad cop” tactic. The nice “moderates” are warning us that if they don’t get what they want, well… whatever those nasty “extremists” do is entirely out of their hands.
Jerry says
I love your analogy. Or another one, it’s like when a polite talking thug says he’d really hate to see something happen to your store. It’s such a nice place and there’s so many bad people out there. It would break his heart if you didn’t accept his great offer on insurance.
Yeah, it’s that kind of “nice.” The kind that threatens to kill you with the best intentions.
Mark Swan says
A Muslim Leader aching for Muslim Law…Imagine that.
We should have never gone down that road of special laws for special people…
They have been very good already at exploiting laws to there extreme advantage…
they find humor in our system…it is a smorgasbord compared to anything they
know elsewhere…to them they have arrived at The Little Rock Candy Mountain.
ONE LAW FOR ONE PEOPLE…No More Hyphenated Americans.
Jerry says
That’s right. The only “special laws” I want are the ones that outlaw the violence they preach and the foreign laws they import.
Mark Swan says
It maybe they already exist…it seems to really take overwhelming public opinion…
Our courts do seem to be affected by it.
mortimer says
SUPREMACIST VIGILANTISM IS NORMATIVE ISLAM, RATHER THAN AN ABERRATION
General Supervisor: Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid
– Knowledge & Propagation » Inviting others to Islam » Rulings on enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil.
33757: Changing evil by one’s hand
From the fatwas of Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, Majallat al-Buhooth al-Islamiyyah, 36/121-122:
Can evil be changed with one’s hand (by taking action)? Who should change evil with his hand?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Allaah has described the believers as denouncing evil and as enjoining what is good. He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“The believers, men and women, are Awliyaa’ (helpers, supporters, friends, protectors) of one another; they enjoin (on the people) Al‑Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do), and forbid (people) from Al‑Munkar (i.e. polytheism and disbelief of all kinds, and all that Islam has forbidden)” – [al-Tawbah 9:71]
“Let there arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam), enjoining Al-Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden)” -[Aal ‘Imraan 3:104]
Marty says
This is a typical strategy of mohammedan colonists.
Get in to a country where you are not wanted.
Pose as victims.
Demand changes to local laws and customs.
If not achieved, threaten violence and then commit violence.
The reason so many Brits admire and envy Australia, is that it
is one of the last and strongest bastions against the cancer of islam.
worldcitizen1919 says
If any woman has been assaulted then it’s up to the law to go after the perpetrator and not vigilante groups. We don’t want any laws but the Australian laws here.
It’s against the law to attack anyone and it’s against the law to form a vigilante.
No government law in existence in the entire world can wholly prevent crime from happening. There’s crime in Muslim countries also despite having extreme laws.
Mark Swan says
Hey worldcitizen1919 where You Been…You Are Absolutely Correct.
JIMJFOX says
“Mr Tawhidi said imams were striving “hard to reform the Muslim community of SA into a tolerant community”.
So he has admitted that the SA muslim community IS INTOLERANT.
How refreshingly [if unintentionally] HONEST of him!
gravenimage says
No, it’s not. He only admits this because he is a Shi’ite, and Sunni Saudis are intolerant toward them.
He is not actually admitting that Islam itself is violent.
ICH says
DUDE !!
You are worried about a headscarf ?
How about you worry about bigger matters like how your kind
are killing people daily in disgusting ways.
YOU never had a life so good as living in the free world.
Go back to mecca you ass
Mark Swan says
Yeah…don’t go away mad…Just Go Away.
David says
Protecting women and children starts at home.
Jay Boo says
Correct
We need to protect women and children from Muslim rape gang thugs.
SpiritOf1683 says
Time to kick the sod out and send him back to the craphole he came from. Muslims don’t belong in the West.
SileReddin says
What a typical overreaction from slime.
SpiritOf1683 says
Its what they do. Just as a dog barks, a Muslim invents ‘grievances’. Its time this cleric was sent to Pakistan.
Falsafa says
for members of the general public who are as tired and disgusted as I am by the bigotry, racism and hate spewed by the loyal contributors of the so called “jihad watch” blog above, here is a link to a web site where you can discover the beauty of Islam.
http://www.islamreligion.com
Peace to All!
Pollewol says
Dear Falsafa, if you didn’t know,or if you don’t want to see, I tell you the following:
Mohamed was a robber, a warlord, a child molester, a rapist, a etnic cleancer, I can read your holy books, in translation (the coran, the souna, and the sharia). Your religion is not a religion of peace, and it is not racist to tell you that because islam is not a race, it is not bigot to call islam a bigot “religion” because it is a totaliterian idiologie. If Islam is so beoutifull, go to an islamic country, Whe don’t need you here in the west. Islam is a curse to free man and woman.
gravenimage says
The absurdly self-styled “Falsafa” wrote:
for members of the general public who are as tired and disgusted as I am by the bigotry, racism and hate spewed by the loyal contributors of the so called “jihad watch” blog above, here is a link to a web site where you can discover the beauty of Islam.
…………………………
How dare we Infidels complain if Mohammedans demand that we enforce Shari’ah law and threaten violence if we don’t?
More:
http://www.islamreligion.com
…………………………
The main article here is about equality– but only among Muslims, not us ‘filthy Infidels’.
Elsewhere on the site, there is a piece by Abu Imram lauding “Martyrdom”–what we would call suicide attacks.
On a piece about the Boston Bombings, the speaker notes that Islam condemns attacks on innocents–without, of course, ever telling us that no Infidel is considered innocent.
It claims that Palestinians are not terrorists. This should not surprise–murdering Jews is always Halal.
Other articles admit that Muhammed raided caravans and allowed the rape of captives.
But most salient of all is a piece by the nasty Zakir Naik, castigating Infidels for daring to call Jihadist killers terrorists. He lauds killing in Islam. He confirms that Jihad should only be against the Mushriqeen–but this includes all Infidels, including the “people of the book”, Jews and Christians.
There are other pieces lauding polygamy. There is also repulsive apologia for Muhammed’s rape of little 9-year-old Aisha. It implies that he could not refuse the request of his ally Abu Bakr that he “marry” the little girl. How *sickening*.
So–what is “Falsafa” doing here? Does he hope we will only read the “nice” article on the first page, or is he unconcerned about our learning–even on the site he links to!–just how vicious Islam really is?
Mirren10 says
Just yesterday, your co-religionists deliberately targeted *Christians* in Lahore, and murdered them.
And you have the incredible **gall** to accuse people *here*, of ”bigotry, racism, and hate” ?
Get out of here, you foul mohammedan.
dumbledoresarmy says
Seconding that, Mirren. That creep ‘falsafa’ has a *hide*, doesn’t he?
gravenimage says
He certainly does.
somehistory says
New *scarf law* to take effect retroactively: No scarves worn in public places for religious purposes are protected garments and receive no special treatment..
Scarves worn for the protection of hair from wind and/or rain are protected garments. Weather conditions must be shown to prove scarf wearing intent is for the protection of hair from wind and/or rain.
Threats of violence and actual violence and the wearing of the moslim scarf are all for the purpose of imposing the unlawful behavior of islam onto the rest of mankind, forcing all non adherents to kowtow to adherents of the worship of satna and his islam beast.
Mark Swan says
DustyFae…You are right….Thank You
We Should all try to avoid viewing graphic violence…We have all witnessed to many things which We would have been better off not seeing.
We can all benefit from trying to remember and think of what is worth focusing on.
whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy—meditate on these things. (Philippians 4:8 ).
bridgette says
It starts with a headscarf and ends with total capitulation and sharia. Ban Pislam!
Rob says
What is it about Muslims that makes them think they have two bites at every cherry?
Don’t agree with your country’s foreign policy?
It’s enough for most to vote against it at the next election. For Muslims, they probably vote but in addition they feel a car bomb is called for.
Had your scarf pulled?
It’s enough to most to complain to the police. For Muslims they do that but threaten mob action as well.
On another note, I see Tony Blair is saying that millions of Muslims have mind sets incompatible with life in Western countries.
Not bad for a guy who headed a government that actively promoted the migration to Britain of 000s of tribal Muslims who wend on to lend such ambiance to Rotherham and the state school system.
Dom1 says
Typical of two faced Blair. He and George W Bush have a lot to answer for. He interfered in Islamic hellholes then lets thousands into UK. SMART,VERY SMART.I THINK NOT !!!
He loved the image of himself standing on tanks in Bosnia taking the cheers of the crowds as the big hero
Cameron wanted this as well for himself in Libya and went running off their after Gadaffy was overthrown to take the plaudits. What a legacy Libya have now!.
Blair warns us later of the dangers of Islamic extremism (In view of events Tony it was rather obvious)
Amazingly he gets a job later to bring peace to the middle east .You couldn’t make this stuff up !!!
Harriet says
the australians, Europeans and Americans SO deserve this..
willful blindness – the ruling elites refuse to accept and understand islam AS MUSLIMS UNDERSTAND islam, and have some fantastic delusion the islam is just another religion whose values and attitudes are the same as Christian.
hahahahaha
gravenimage says
So–you are saying that every Westerner deserves to be the victim of Muslim violence, and you are in fact *laughing* at the prospect?
What are you doing here at Jihad Watch in the first place, if you don’t plan to fight? Unless, of course, you actually relish the specter of Islam taking over? *Ugh*.
Singh The Sikh says
HE MAYOR OF MARYBOROUGH, VICTORIA HAS REFUSED TO REMOVE PORK FROM THEIR SCHOOLS CAFETERIA MENUS AND EXPLAINS WHY:
Muslim parents demanded the abolition of pork in all the school canteens of Maryborough. The Mayor of Maryborough has refused, and the town clerk sent a note to all parents to explain why.
“Muslims must understand that they have to adapt to Australia, its customs, its traditions, and its way of life, because that’s where they chose to immigrate.
“Muslims must understand that they have to integrate and learn to live in Australia. They must understand that it is for them to change their lifestyle, not the Australians who, so generously welcomed them.
“Australians are neither racist nor xenophobic. Australia accepted many immigrants before Muslims showed up (whereas the reverse is not true, in that Muslim states will not accept non-Muslim immigrants).
“Just like other nations, Australians are not willing to give up their identity or their culture. And, since Australia is a land of welcome, it’s not the Mayor of Maryborough who welcomes foreigners, but the Australian people as a whole.
“Finally, they must understand that in Australia with its Judeo-Christian roots, Christmas trees, churches and religious festivals, religion must remain in the private domain.” Australia is absolutely right to refuse any concessions to Islam and Sharia.
“For Muslims who disagree with secularism and do not feel comfortable in Australia, there are 57 beautiful Muslim countries in the world, most of them under-populated and ready to receive them with open halal arms in accordance with Sharia.
“If you left your country for Australia, and not for other Muslim countries, it is because you have considered that life is better in Australia than elsewhere. We will not let you drag Australia down to the level of those 57 countries.”
Ask yourself this question – just once, “Why is it better here in Australia than where you came from?”
“A canteen with pork on the menu is not the problem – it is part of the answer. If you came to Australia with the idea that you will displace us with your prolific propagation and eventually take over the country, you should pack up and go back to the country you came from. We have no room here for you or your ideology.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. AUSTRALIA — LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT !!!
MAY ALL BEINGS BE HAPPY AND WELL
somehistory says
Good for him! Thanks for sharing.
tilda says
The note sounds like a hoax, and was probably written by someone who doesn’t understand government power structures. A mayor (local government) is unlikely to have any power to decide what can and can’t be served in school canteens (education being state and commonwealth powers).
Singh the Sikh says
Likely a hoax but symbolically a strong, valid arguement and rebuke. Problem is even logical arguements against Islamic jihad publically expressed can get you fired from a govt job.
Jenny H says
Thank you, Singh the Sikh for letting us know about this. I hadn’t heard about it before. I hope others follow the Mayor’s example.
Larry A. Singleton says
Ban the Burqa? The Argument in Favor by Phyllis Chesler.
davej says
I fear (and hope) the day will come when the non-Muslim community will take matters into their own hands and rise up against the arrogance and violence of Islam in order to protect their women and children.
Couldn’t happen too soon.
Jenny H says
Unfortunately, Singh the Sikh, an on-line search: Mayor of Maryborough Pork, claims that the story about the Mayor of Maryborough refusing to ban pork is a hoax.
islam :- the religion of killers says
This looks like a AUS mini version of, Hamas linked CAIR, already trying to tell us what to do, how can people take these idiots seriously, wha wha, an infidel pulled my hoodie off, F**K you, what about all the woman & children Muslims have raped or killed in AUS alone,,, what about the Lindor Cafe in Sydney, and on and on it goes …
“Australian Muslims may resort to violence if headscarf laws not changed, SA imam says,”
SA Imam, you listen to Aussie blokes, “straight up, mate,, threaten us and this WILL end badly”
Cameron says
Men who force women to cover themselves (denying the freedom of choice of the women themselves) should have to pay a fine for every day that they are forcing bronze age desert dress customs on women outside of the desert and/or in the modern era. Men who in response to this who force women to stay indoors (contrary to the woman’s choices) should be given an even greater fine.
Men who do any of the above who aren’t able to afford to pay these fines (such as those living on welfare) should be sent to compulsory reeducation courses on ‘life and customs of the civilized world’ before they can qualify for welfare payments. Further punishments to apply as needed.
richard courtemanche says
Get ahead of him Australia, expel him now based on his threat.
UNCLE VLADDI says
“Protect women and mothers” – from what?!
Since the Qur’anic Sura involving headscarves – Sura 33:59 – says they have to cover up lest the MUSLIMS have to rape them – it means THEY ARE ANGRY THAT WE AREN’T ALLOWING THEIR WOMEN TO PROTECT THEM SELVES FROM THEIR OWN MEN!
dumbledoresarmy says
Threat noted, mate.
I hope ASIO and the AFP are taking a heightened interest in you and your mosque from now on. If they haven’t bugged your car, home and mosque I hope they hurry up and do so, quicksmart.
native jo says
Aren’t they worried about discrimination? The headscarf make you more noticeable, thus making you a target and incites violence. Makes me want to commit violence. I see it as oppressive. Just like how Muslims murder their daughters for assimilating, makes them violent. This guy should be arrested and kicked out of the country. It’s a safety issue. He doesn’t like the rules, then he should go. Like my parents who supplied me with a home but if I didn’t follow rules, I would have to find my own place.