“The Prophet said, ‘Angels do not enter a house in which there are dogs or pictures.” (Sahih-Al-Bukhari, 7.833, Narrated by Abu Talha)
I first posted at Jihad Watch seven years ago (June 11, 2009) a piece about the fear and hatred Muslims appear to harbor for dogs, and about the consequent mistreatment dogs endure from Muslims. The reports of such mistreatment, by Muslims, of precisely the animal that is most celebrated for his devotion and loyalty to humans, has for many been further confirmation that something is terribly wrong with Islam. That is the tack taken by Peter Hammond in his recent appearance at The Glazov Gang on “Islam’s Hatred of Dogs.”
My post began with a few representative stories about such mistreatment, such as this from England:
In the Reading Evening Mail, for example, one story described a 71-year-old blind Englishman and cancer sufferer who was asked to get off a bus because of the hysterical reaction to his seeing-eye dog by some Muslims on the bus:
A driver told a blind cancer sufferer to get off his bus when a woman and her children became hysterical at the sight of his guide dog. George Herridge, 71, told how the mum flew into a rage and shouted at him in a foreign language. A passenger explained she wanted him to get off the bus during the incident on May 20.
Mr Herridge, from Tern Close, Tilehurst, said: “Her child was kicking and screaming and someone off the bus told me her child was frightened of my dog. The driver said, ‘Look mate, can’t you get off? I stood my ground. I had not done anything, my dog had not done anything and I was getting off the bus for no one.”
And a day after the latest bus incident a lady began screaming “I don’t like dirty dogs” at Mr Herridge at the Royal Berkshire Hospital.
A week earlier he faced further animosity from a couple at Asda in The Meadway, he said.
He is unsure what has provoked outbursts but said he thinks some have come from Asian [i.e., Muslim] people and that it may be due to religious or cultural differences.
Drivers have been re-instructed to convey the blind and the bus company has sought advice from the Royal National Institute for the Blind and hopes to speak with Muslim leaders. As part of a Muslim Council of Britain project, Mufti Zubair Butt, Shar’ia advisor to Muslim Spiritual Care Provision in the NHS, admitted Muslims “require some education” on guide dogs.”
I went on to mention, in that 2009 posting, similar reports about Somali cab drivers in Minneapolis who refused to pick up passengers with seeing-eye or service dogs.
These were offered as examples of the extreme Muslim reaction to dogs that so often occurs when they are asked merely to accept what for us is a matter of course, such as the use of seeing-eye dogs. For many Muslims, dogs provoke not quiet distaste, but rather a kind of fearful hysteria.
But where does this extreme hatred and hysteria come from? It comes not from the Qur’an, but from the dozens of hadith in which Muhammad expresses his opposition to dogs. But what is most interesting are those hadith in which both dogs, and depictions of living creatures, whether as pictures or statues, are essentially declared to be haram.
Here is one such, where Muhammad is reported to have said: “Angels will not enter a house in which there are dogs or pictures.” (Sahih-Al-Bukhari, 7.833, Narrated by Abu Talha) There are other variants, in which the Muslim prophet says “Angels do not enter a house in which there are dogs or statues.” The point was to avoid all figurative art, whether paintings or statues, of sentient beings. And Christian homes would often have pictures or statues of Mary, Jesus, different saints. By stating that angels would not enter a house with pictures or statues, Muhammad — or whoever was responsible for those hadiths — signalled Muslims to follow suit, distancing themselves from Christian practices and from Christians themselves. And from those slender beginnings arose the ferocious antipathy to idols, pictures, and, especially, statues, which has led, over 1350 years, to the destruction of vast numbers of pictures and statues – first those of Christians, and later those of the conquered Hindus and Buddhists, continuing right up to the present day, with the blowing up of the Bamiyan Buddhas and the ISIS destruction of Assyrian statuary.
One way to help Muslims fulfill their duty “not to take Christians as friends” was to discourage them from entering houses where such taswir might still be found. And Christians, in order to have members of the dominant, i.e., Muslim, class feel able to enter their houses, which for some Christians could be a desirable thing (in order to curry favor with the Muslims who now ruled over them), might find themselves more willing to remove the offending statues, idols, and pictures from their own homes. Finally, the presence of such depictions allowed Muslims to easily distinguish the Christian from the Muslim households. To understand the warning against dogs in the same hadiths, that explain the refusal of Muslim cab-drivers in Minneapolis today to pick up passengers with their seeing-eye and service dogs, you need to go back to hadiths that are more than a millennium old.
The leading historian of Zoroastrianism, Mary Boyce, who lived in Iran from 1963 to 1964, offers an intimate view of the fiendish cruelty with which Muslim Iranians treated the dogs so revered by Zoroastrians. Boyce suggests that the cynophobia in Islam started in Iran, after its conquest by Muslim Arabs, and was “deliberately fostered in the first place in Iran, as a point of opposition to the old (pre-Islamic jihad conquest) faith (i.e., Zoroastrianism)”:
In Sharifabad the dogs distinguished clearly between Moslem and Zoroastrian, and were prepared to go…full of hope, into a crowded Zoroastrian assembly, or to fall asleep trustfully in a Zoroastrian lane, but would flee as before Satan from a group of Moslem boys…The evidence points…to Moslem hostility to these animals having been deliberately fostered in the first place in Iran, as a point of opposition to the old (pre-Islamic jihad conquest) faith (i.e., Zoroastrianism) there. Certainly in the Yazdi area…Moslems found a double satisfaction in tormenting dogs, since they were thereby both afflicting an unclean creature and causing distress to the infidel who cherished him. There are grim…stories from the time (i.e., into the latter half of the 19th century) when the annual poll-tax (jizya) was exacted, of the tax gatherer tying a Zoroastrian and a dog together, and flogging both alternately until the money was somehow forthcoming, or death released them. I myself was spared any worse sight than that of a young Moslem girl…standing over a litter of two-week old puppies, and suddenly kicking one as hard as she could with her shod foot. The puppy screamed with pain, but at my angry intervention she merely said blankly, “But it’s unclean.” In Sharifabad I was told by distressed Zoroastrian children of worse things: a litter of puppies cut to pieces with a spade-edge, and a dog’s head laid open with the same implement; and occasionally the air was made hideous with the cries of some tormented animal. Such wanton cruelties on the Moslems’ part added not a little to the tension between the communities.
At The Glazov Gang, Peter Hammond makes the case that because the distinguishing features of dogs – loyalty, self-sacrifice, devotion – so obviously represent the Good, Muslims hate them for that very reason. It’s certainly not impossible. But following upon Boyce, I suggest it is more plausible to imagine that Muslim hatred of dogs had nothing to do with their canine virtues, and everything to do with the desire to distinguish Muslims from Zoroastrians. Had not dogs but some other animal — say, cats — been revered in Zoroastrianism, then the hatred of cats rather than dogs would have “been fostered” in Islam in the same way, with one Hadith having Muhammad report that angels refused to enter a house with cats, and another with Muhammad saying that Muslim prayers lose their efficacy if said while a cat passes. Dogs were hated by Muslims not because, pace Hammond, of their innate virtues, but simply because Zoroastrians placed so high a value on them: Despise whatever the Kuffar revere.
Would that those in power began, possibly with the assistance of one or more of Spencer’s vademecums, to familiarize themselves with Islam, to understand what the mosques and madrasas inculcate, to grasp the Islamic division of the world between Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, to take note of the Arab supremacism that perdures within a faith that claims to be universal, and to figure out what the spread of Islam means for all of us, the world’s Infidels, for our arts and sciences, for our freedoms of speech and religion, for our legal systems, for our household goods and gods, for the survival of our paintings and statues, and yes — also sprach Zarathustra – even for our dogs.

Champ ✿ says
Man’s best friend at play! Dogs are great!
https://youtu.be/tPgdEsVpaXI
jihad3tracker says
THANK YOU, CHAMP. I NEED RELIEF FROM THE PATHOLOGY OF ISLAM — AND PROBABLY EVERY OTHER JIHAD WATCH READER DOES TOO.
BTW, THIS IS A PERFECT POST FOR SOME — SHALL WE SAY “LESS AMIABLE” DOGS? — WHO SHOW IN VIDEOS HOW THEY PERSONALLY FEEL REGARDING BLOODTHIRSTY ALLAH.
I WILL BE BACK WITH AN EXAMPLE LATER TODAY — STAY TUNED.
Mirren10 says
jihad3tracker, I love your posts, but could you please take off the caps lock ?
jihad3tracker says
You are right — spanking accepted. The motivation is enthusiasm for the fellow posters’ treasured nuggets which come along sometimes. In longer multi-paragraph comments I usually stick to predominantly lower case, with a few select sentences otherwise.
Champ says
You’re welcome, Jihad3tracker! …glad you enjoyed it.Yeah dogs are one of God’s gifts to mankind, and they’re sooo much fun!
But of course there is no fun in islam, and ‘allah’ wants nothing to do with dogs.
jihad3tracker says
Here is a brief visit with a neighbor’s Rottweiler after I read Hugh Fitzgerald’s superb exposition upon Sahih Al-Bukhari 7.833.
This is his reaction to me opening a copy of the Qur’an at Chapter Nine (Taubah), pointing to verses mandating subjugation or violence upon Infidels and hypocrites:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W3kPSrqGbo
Yes, it is not easy to watch a canine like this noble fellow justifiably enraged — but he calms down right away when I show him videos of Pam and Robert..
Karen says
I notice he has a little piggy toy! Is he defending our beloved bacon? 🙂
Great video, but he’s not fooling anyone. He’s a sweetheart!! Beautiful animal, as are Champ’s little friends too.
Mirren10 says
That is so *adorable*, Champ.
My two labs used to love playing in the snow. Gosh I miss them.
Hope you’re well, my American friend !
By the way, was one of those little dogs actually wearing *boots*, or did my eyes deceive me ? 🙂
Champ says
Hi Mirren10! Yes–all is well, here, thank you! How are things across the Pond? 🙂
Thank you–yes, dogs at play are absolutely adorable, and I had a hard time choosing a dog video, since there are so many to choose from. And I love snow, so I went with this video ..and you’re right, one of the dogs is wearing cute little snow boots–too cute! 😀
The awful truth says
I totally agree that dogs are hated in Islam because they were sacred to zoroastrians. I knew a Muslim family from 1980 who had a pet dog but they were Malay Muslims seen as moderate then. The women didn’t cover their heads – but thanks to KSA spending over $70 billion since 1978 (http://youtu.be/Sfpq0hek7e8) spreading Wahabbism I expect that Malays now despise dogs as well (they all now slavishly cover their heads). Muslims don’t seem to mind cats so much – perhaps they were despised by zoroastrians. A cat is featured in the above documentary on Saudi Arabia. Of course the Elgin marbles and Pergamon altar were dissimissivy ceded by the Ottomans who found them worthless to the UK and Germany respectively, their cultural loss is our cultural gain. May my mind not be poisoned by Koran’s chapter 9 and what emanates from it. Saudi Arabia is America’s best friend but about the same as North Korea. Go figure.
Angemon says
And this not in the 7th century but in the early-1960’s.
Mirren10 says
Here’s a wonderful service dog who saved his owners life. As Champ says, there are so many to choose from !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RWcFuKbAvs
Just another thing that illustrates the depravity of islam and its adherents, this hatred of man’s best friend.
Champ says
Thank you, Mirren10, what a touching story! Dogs are wonderful pets and friends; and I also miss my Rottie “Jubilee”, she was amazing!
Anne Smith says
They should have thrown the Muslim scum off the bus, and warned them not to come back. The guide dog is infinitely more useful than they are.
fred says
a dogs is unclean, but muslims drin camel urine, because it is the will of the prophet ?
MTMLA says
How about BALTO in Nome, Alaska who saved a village and brought back the needed medicine to save many citizens of a deadly disease. There is a statue o Balto and its body is preserved in a museum. He is a true hero.
Charli Main says
A much loved Doberman, sadly now long gone, always exhibited remarkably good taste. On his twice daily walks to the local park, we had to walk past a Mosque and Jonty never failed to cock his leg on the Mosque wall and relieve himself.
Today, I expect our ever vigilant police, would of surrounded him with tazers, spotted him in machine pistol laser sights and arrested him for Islamophobia.
Mirren10 says
Hi, Charlie !
I sometimes used to take my labs, Henry and Oscar, into town to visit friends, and the way to the park also led past the mosque. Oscar was black, and I used to linger outside the mosque door, telling him to sit, and ” give paw”, to be rewarded with a treat.
”Today, I expect our ever vigilant police, would of surrounded him with tazers, spotted him in machine pistol laser sights and arrested him for Islamophobia.”
Yep. And you and me, too.
Charli Main says
Hi M10
have you been following the story about the Muslim shopkeeper that was beaten to death, by a Muslim gang, for wishing a customer ” happy Easter ” and making a similar post on Face book.
Seems they kept kicking his head, until his skull was mush.????
Charli Main says
Police Scotland said they have arrested a 32-year-old Muslim man in connection with the attack, which they are treating as “religiously prejudiced”.
In the hours before he died, Mr Shah posted on Facebook: “Good Friday and a very Happy Easter, especially to my beloved Christian nation… Let’s follow the real footstep of beloved holy Jesus Christ (PBUH) [peace be upon him], and get the real success in both worlds xxxx.”
Sorry M10. forgot to post this for you. regards
Mirren10 says
Hi, Charli.
Yes, I’ve been following it, thanks. Poor man.
”Police Scotland said they have arrested a 32-year-old Muslim man in connection with the attack, which they are treating as “religiously prejudiced”.
”religiously prejudiced” eh ? What happened to ‘hate crime’ ? Oops, forgot, it’s only a hate crime if it’s a non-muslim doing it.
I wonder if the egregious Qasim Rashid has read about this, (one of his fellow Ahmadiya) and thinks it’s down to ‘islamophobia ?
jewdog says
Is it true that since Infidels like dogs, Muslims dislike them? Could be, but Islam has appropriated many beliefs and practises from pre-existing faiths: the concept of heaven and hell, charity, monotheism, prayer, belief in the prophetic status of Jesus and Moses, fasting etc. I tend to look for psychological explanations when there are emotions involved. For example, the passion many Christians have about the abortion issue. Muslims passionately hate dogs. Here’s my dime-store psychological explanation: Dogs are known for their submissiveness, implicity mimicking the behavior demanded by Islam of humans, but dogs will be faithful to anyone, not just Muslims, and that is why they are hated. Cats are not submissive and so are exempt from heresy.
fred says
I think muhammad had a problem with sheep dogs, and little girl’s guard dogs.
Just A Concerned Citizen says
I’m a firm believer that if there is pure goodness and love to be found in this world, it exists pretty much only in canine form.
Berengaria says
Have you forgotten the BO’s family’s disdain for dogs, using the excuse that the fat little one was allergic to dogs, then having the dog fly on a separate plane so the BOs’ would not be offended. BO said he ate “dog” in Indonesia, a bit stringy but good. Can you imagine the bloody WH kitchen, after a dog has been butchered “halal” style?
mortimer says
Cruelty to animals and the halal slaughter of them is the school in which Muslim children learn cruelty to the dirty kafirs.
‘But it’s unclean’, said the Muslim girl who savagely kicked a puppy. It reminds me of Adolf Eichmann’s reply when asked how he was able to murder Jewish children, ‘But they were Jewish children.
With dog hatred, Muslims prepare to think of kafirs as unclean vermin to be exterminated.
Mr. Trump, THAT’S where all the hatred comes from…Islamic doctrines. They are normative and not aberrations.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
So according to scripture (Bukhari 7.833), Islam condemns having a dog in the house, as well as interior décor in which there are pictures on the wall: “The Prophet said, ‘Angels do not enter a house in which there are dogs or pictures.’”
A house with pictures *of* dogs, as in the illustration above, is doubly cursed.
Islam also disapproves of gambling (which eats into a Muslim’s time on the prayer-mat), so a picture of dogs playing poker would be even worse:
http://www.dogsplayingpoker.org/gallery/coolidge/img/a_friend_in_need.jpg
But adventurous Muslim art-lovers can get an extra-transgressive frisson by decorating their home with a painting of dogs playing poker while practicing isbaal:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=dogs%20playing%20poker#imgrc=vqtvRBJBAIfCKM%3A
This painting is a four-fer: dogs, pictures, gambling, and ankle-hiding clothing.
DFD says
Many thanks for those links 🙂
abad says
Boyce is probably correct, – she was required reading for my degree in Near Eastern Studies/Pre-Islamic Iran.
As for the images part – you know, those many and often very beautiful Persian miniatures depicting scenes from the Shah Nameh or Layla and Majnun- my guess is the non-Shi’ites don’t have any of those in their homes.
Oh such paintings of Muhammad do indeed exist, such as this one:
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/73113193920284433/
but they are few and far between, maybe not the most accurate (same issue with the many many paintings of Jesus) since most of them do look well a little bit Iranian. 🙂 But we all know Mo was an Arab, not Aryan (Persian)
Western Canadian says
Give the human race a choice between a world with dogs, OR a world with muslims, and the dogs would win by a non-muslim mile. Now, if only we could make it a binding referendum……
IQ al Rassooli says
Dear Mr FITZGERALD and all others commenting here.
My conclusions for Muslim hatred of dogs is based upon my several decades of research that actually re enforce many of the comments made here~
Muhammad & Dogs
Although over two hundred verses in Muhammad’s Quran deal with animals and six suras (chapters) of the Quran are named after animals, animal life is not a predominant theme in the Quran as they are usually perceived in relation to humans.
The majority of both Sunni and Shi’a Muslim jurists consider dogs to be ritually unclean, though jurists from the Sunni Maliki school disagree.
According to Sunni tradition, Muhammad didn’t like dogs and most practicing Muhammadans do not have dogs as pets. It is said that angels do not enter a house which contains a dog. Though dogs are not allowed for pets, they are allowed to be kept if used for work, such as guarding your house or farm, or when used for hunting purposes.
According to several Hadiths, Muhammad considered black dogs as evil, or even devils, in animal form.
In both Sunni and Shi’a accounts, Muhammad is said to have conversed nonchalantly with camels, birds and other species of animals. Of course, these miraculous conversations are not mentioned in the Quran because in reality they were concocted over a period of 300 years after his death to give Muhammad the same supernatural qualities as King Solomon who talked to animals as mentioned in the Quran Surat Al Naml 28:18.
Muhammad’s hatred of dogs in general and black ones in particular, may be attributed to a nasty encounter or experience during his childhood. Otherwise, why would an alleged shepherd boy have a morbid fear or dislike of them when they are the best animals to herd, control, and defend them? Besides the horse, the dog is the friendliest, most loving and most loyal animal to man.
Sahih Muslim Hadith 551 Narrated by Abdullah Ibn Mughaffal
The Messenger of Allah ordered killing of the dogs and then said: What about them, i.e. about other dogs? – but then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.
Sahih Muslim Hadith 1032 Narrated by AbuDharr
The Messenger of Allah said: When any one of you stands for prayer …. his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, a woman, or a black dog. I said: O AbuDharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguishes it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.
*** The greatest and most intelligent of all prophets recognized the devil in black dogs. It takes a Satan to recognize another Satan***
Sahih Muslim Hadith 3814 Narrated by Abdullah Ibn Mughaffal
Allah’s Messenger ordered the killing of dogs and then said: What is the trouble with them (the people of Medina)? How dogs are nuisance to them (the citizens of Medina)? He then permitted keeping of dogs for hunting and (the protection of) herds.
*** Muhammad, willy nilly, made important statements, changed his mind and rescinded earlier ones just as Allah (Muhammad’s mouth piece) was doing with his Abrogating & Abrogated verses.
Readers should not be surprised since they should know by now that Muhammad, Gabriel, Allah & Satan are one and the same character: Muhammad the Ventriloquist***
Sahih Muslim Hadith 5248 Narrated by Maymunah
One morning Allah’s Messenger was silent with grief. Maymunah said: Allah’s Messenger, I find a change in your mood today. Allah’s Messenger said: Gabriel had promised me that he would meet me last night, but he did not meet me. By Allah, he never broke his promises; and Allah’s Messenger spent the day in this sad (mood).
Then it occurred to him that there had been a puppy under their cot. He gave an order and it was turned out. He then took some water in his hand and sprinkled it on the place. When it was evening Gabriel met him and he said to him: You promised me that you would meet me the previous night. He said: Yes, but we do not enter a house in which there is a dog or a picture.
So the very next morning he commanded the dogs to be killed. He announced that the dog kept for the orchards should also be killed, but he spared the dog used for the protection of extensive fields (or big gardens).
*** It is upon such incredible stupidities & mendacities do the followers of Muhammad hang their LOGIC and INTELLECT.
That is why most Muhammadans do not own dogs as pets and actually shrink from them ***
Al-Tirmidhi Hadith 4102 & Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2839 Narrated by Abdullah ibn Mughaffal
The Prophet said, “Were dogs not a species of creature I should command that they all be killed; but kill every pure black one.”
Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2840 Narrated byJabir ibn Abdullah
The Prophet of Allah ordered to kill dogs, and we were even killing a dog which a woman brought with her from the desert. Afterwards he forbade to kill them, saying: Confine yourselves to the type which is black.
*** Muhammad’s racism towards Blacks in general is a continuation of Arab supremacism vis a vis Africans whom they call Abeed meaning SLAVES***
Sunan of Abu-DawoodHadith 5084 Narrated by Jabir ibn Abdullah
The Prophet said: When you hear the barking of dogs and the braying of asses at night, seek refuge in Allah, for they see which you do not see. (That is they see the Devil).
Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 1.493 Narrated by Aisha
The things which annul prayer were mentioned before me (and those were): a dog, a donkey and a woman. I said, “You have compared us (women) to donkeys and dogs. …..”
Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 1.498 Narrated by Aisha
It is not good that you people have made us (women) equal to dogs and donkeys. No doubt I saw Allah’s Apostle praying while I used to lie between him and the Qibla and when he wanted to prostrate, he pushed my legs and I withdrew them.
*** Even an unlearned teenager such as Aisha was, realized to what level of degradation womanhood was reduced to by Muhammad and his male followers even unto today’s 21st century.
1400 years of human progress have not been able to dent the thick armour of total & abysmal stupidity that is the Demonic Cult of Muhammadan Islam***
Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.540 Narrated by Abdullah bin Umar
Allah’s Apostle ordered that dogs should be killed.
Al-Muwatta Hadith 20.90 Animals that Someone in Ihram can Kill
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Dinar from Abdullah ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah said,”There are five (kinds of) animal which it is not wrong for some one in ihram to kill: scorpions, rats and mice, crows, kites and wild dogs. ”
*** Only by studying Muhammad himself and hence his
PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE
can one understand his HATREDS, ANGER, JEALOUSY, POMPOSITY, MENDACITY and other unsavoury characteristics of his.
They are all caused by his
PATHOLOGICAL NARCISISSISM.
Muhammad HATED all creatures, human or animal that exhibit HAPPINESS, JOY, FIDELITY, LOVE, AFFECTION and LOYALTY; these are the very attributes of DOGS. As we all know by now, he was lacking in all these characteristics. So do his cloned believing followers (Muslims); the JOYLESS HATEMONGERING LIVING DEAD.
That is exactly why Fundamentalist Muhammadan Muslims have no dogs as pets as well as show exactly the same depraved lack of compassion or mercy towards any and all humans who do not follow their creed.
That is why Believing Muhammadan Muslims would rather DIE slaughtering unarmed & defenseless civilians, the so called Unbelieving Kuffar, for the “sake of Allah” “fi sabil^Allah” in expectation of eternal sensual & sexual pleasures in Muhammad’s whoredom version of Paradise than enjoying life on Earth***
I hope, ladies & gentlemen that you have noticed that I have quoted to you from Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Al Tirmidi, Abu Dawood & Al Muwatta Hadiths with different narrators but non the less, our Muhammadan adversaries will tell you that this or that Hadith is a lie, is weak or unacceptable to Sunni Muhammadan scholars, or to Shi’I ones, or to both.
As you have also found out by now from their comments, their videos and their arguments with you that they must remain in a PERMANENT state of DENIAL, otherwise they would have to throw away the shackles of their Cult belief system or apostatize.
I am sure that by now, you and you alone have the knowledge & the right to determine the veracity or lack thereof in my articles.
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
The awful truth says
Time for me to make some pork curry and look after a nice black dog.
Shmooviyet says
“…Mufti Zubair Butt, Shar’ia advisor to Muslim Spiritual Care Provision in the NHS, admitted Muslims “require some education” on guide dogs.”
Did they try it? How’d it work out?
Dogs add too much to the love of life to be accepted or withstood; how terrible for the dogs unfortunate enough to be born in muslim countries. Just another living creature to be kicked and abused.
ThePractical1 says
And here I was thinking Mad M0 hated dogs because perhaps M0 whacked a dog in the chops because he was sniffing around M0’s odorous privates after one of his nefarious forays and the dog bit his privates in return.
But deep inside I knew it must be much more complicated than that.
Greytigertx says
But…
Everyone knows dogs are better than muslims.
Dogs are more intelligent.
Dogs are cleaner.
Dogs show more love and loyalty.
Dogs wont bite a muslim, they cant stand the bad taste.
Dogs smell better.
Dogs are better looking.
f c king says
And dogs dont drink camel urine
dumbledoresarmy says
Something to think about…
IN many wars, humans have used dogs. And many animal-lovers in the modern west deplore the human use of animals – whether dogs, or horses, or carrier pigeons, whatever – in their (humans’) internecine quarrels, because this is interpreted as cruelty to animals; the poor creature is dragged into and used within something it cannot understand.
But the great War of Self-Defence Against the Jihad is different.
In *that* war, the dogs who accompany their Infidel companions and masters into battle, as Explosive Detection Dogs, or who sniff luggage at an airport, or accompany the riot police to suppress a mohammedan riot, or assist the police in the capture of a murderous jihadi – are fighting to defend a world in which the Ancient Alliance of humans and dogs can persist and flourish. A world in which cruelty to dogs and to other animals is generally frowned upon – as opposed to the hideous dar al Islam within which extreme cruelty to humans, and to dogs (and indeed to many or most animals) is commonplace. The dogs are not simply being ‘used’ – as one might argue that they were or have been, in other conflicts, conflicts where Islam was not involved. They are our Comrades -in-Arms and we have *got* to try to win, for their sakes and our own.
Further thought: imagine, if you will, an animated movie set in Afghanistan. Disney-style, told from the POV of … the local pi-dogs. You begin with some background: the dogs listening to the old Pack Leader telling stories, remembering The Time Before The Humans Went Mad (i.e, the Time Before Islam, when humans and dogs were friends and companions). Then there are the stories of the arrival of the Madness (i.e. Islam): how most humans suddenly became incredibly cruel and violent toward one another and toward dogs, cursing, stone-throwing, killing. The dogs cannot understand it. Next major plot-point: arrival of Infidel troops to combat the Taliban. Said troops are accompanied, of course, by their dogs. And our poor, suffering, desperate group of pi-dogss gradually discover that there are humans in the world who really do – just like the old legends say – *like* dogs. It takes them a while to get over their fear and learn to trust these new, different humans. Then a Taliban human bomb tries to attack the group of American (or other Infidel) soldiers who have befriended our doggie protagonists. The dogs bail him up and stop him from proceeding to where he can kill the soldiers; he blows himself up, one of the dogs is killed, the others are badly hurt (nota bene: *this* incident is inspired by something that really happened in Afghanistan; stray dogs befriended by a group of American soldiers, stopped a Taliban human bomb). The wounded survivors are cared for, doctored, and eventually transported to America to good homes with army veterans/ their relatives. They find out that there really *is* a world out there where humans, just like in the old stories they (these poor Afghan dogs) had remembered, in general like dogs (and punish those who hurt them and abuse them). The film could end with the service of the Blessing of the Pets on Saint Francis’s Day, with the dogs’ new owners leading them forward to receive a blessing, and telling the story of how they saved lives.
Done right, something like this could be a very good way to expose the sheer horribleness of Islam. One would *not* need to exaggerate anything. The plain facts of Islamic cruelty are damning enough.
Mirren10 says
”Further thought: imagine, if you will, an animated movie set in Afghanistan. Disney-style, told from the POV of … the local pi-dogs.”
That’s *brilliant* dda. You should write it as a story. My heart aches for every dog (and any other animals) in mohammedan lands. B******s.
wildbill2u says
Three weeks ago my mother (95 y.0.) was scheduled to have an attendant begin work at her house. When I went to the door, there was a Muslim lady in a hajib and another lady. The other lady was a non-Muslim who was there to vouch for the Musilm lady as “a good person.”
As we were talking my tiny Yorkshire terrier came to the door, wagging her whole body in welcome to some new playmates. Noticing the Muslim lady shrink back, I remembered the Muslim aversion to dogs for religious reasons. She acknowledged this and said if even a nose of a dog touched the hem of her dress then she would become unclean and have to go through a rite to purify herself and her garments. Medieval beliefs of desert tribes still persist in our modern communities among Muslims who do not assimilate.
Needless to say, this ended any possibility of her becoming employed at my house.
MRBIGGS---- says
*SEMINAR ON HADITH AL-BUKHARI?
Hi Mr. Spencer. Been reading you for years now. Keep up the good fight,
which is for Muslims and everyone all over the world.
Could you please consider writing an article or something
about the hadith Al-Bukhari and its significance to jihad and
many other Islamic practices?
Many in the ‘But-It’s-Not-In-the-Koran Crowd’ need a primer on this foundational text
and its role behind so much mayhem and misery…..
+ Happy Easter! +
Resist says
Never seen so many children nowadays that hate dogs!!! These muslims are pure evil. They dont even come close to a dog as far as spirituality, compassion, loyalty, love. Dog is God spelled backwards. Thanks God for animals and dogs in particular. Not grateful for these horrible muslims who are just hate and the lowest people on Earth
Mae says
What a sick “religion”!
We love our dogs and know even if they roll in a pile of excrement, we can wash them off. Adherents to this fake “religion” are filthy through and through and a good bath won’t cure them of that malady.
j_not_q says
Truck drivers crossing over from France to Britain ought to be accompanied by well trained attack dogs (ideally black dogs) to protect themselves and their cargo from muzzlum stowaways. Don’t know why they aren’t doing this already.
Women in high risk areas (ones where there are good chances of being sexually harassed or worse by so called migrants) should seriously consider getting a well trained attack dog, again preferably black, again for their own protection. Muzzlum repellant of the best kind. And get trained in self defence. No better kind than Israeli style. Krav maga is it.
citycat says
Maybe the eyes of pictures could be a portal for spies to distantly view through, or the statues for spirits to hide in. Perhaps Mo was paranoid.
Maybe why the Sphinx has no eyes.
Maybe because Mo had no control over the pictures or statues view of him.
Maybe they gave him a look that he could not challenge.
These narcissist leaders from God have an uncompromizing ego, like a boiled egg.
No control over dogs or pictures, therefore destroy as they won’t do as they are told.
Angels?
Who has ever seen an angel?
7 billion people, surely someone would have seen one.
If a tiny part of existance assumes superiority over all of existance, then i would call that part the epitome of evil.
Mo is only one of many such parts.
Karen says
I think you have something here. He tried to control speech, and the news that was getting around about him. He killed off people who spoke and wrote about him in the local outlets of the day. He must have been enormously paranoid, as his formally peaceful nature clashed with the growing violence of his personality; the inner conflict and guilt must have been unbearable at times. Imagine all those silent eyes looking at you, and seeing all your secrets.
BTW, many people have reported seeing angels. Guidepost magazine used to publish lots of stories about encounters with angels; you might enjoy some of them.
paul says
Somebody set dogs on these terrorists long ago……..