What could possibly go wrong?
“IAEA: Iran Nuke Deal Limits Public Reporting on Possible Violations,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, March 7, 2016:
The head of the international community’s nuclear watchdog organization disclosed Monday that certain agreements reached under the Iran nuclear deal limit inspectors from publicly reporting on potential violations by the Islamic Republic.
Yukiya Amano, chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, which is responsible for ensuring Iran complies with the agreement, told reporters that his agency is no longer permitted to release details about Iran’s nuclear program and compliance with the deal.
Amano’s remarks come on the heels of a February IAEA oversight report that omitted many details and figures related to Iran’s nuclear program. The report sparked questions from outside nuclear experts and accusations from critics that the IAEA was not being transparent with its findings.
Amano disclosed in response to questions from reporters that the last report was intentionally vague because the nuclear agreement prohibits the IAEA from publishing critical data about Iran’s program that had been disclosed by the agency in the past.
“The misunderstanding is that the basis of reporting is different,” Amano said. “In the previous reports, the bases were the previous [United Nations] Security Council Resolutions and Board of Governors. But now they are terminated. They are gone.”
Most U.N. measures pertaining to Iran—including its military buildup and illicit work on nuclear technology—were removed following the nuclear agreement, which essentially rewrote the organization’s overall approach to the country.
The IAEA, which operates under the U.N. umbrella, must now follow the new resolutions governing the implementation of the nuclear pact, Amano said.
“These two resolutions and the other resolutions of the Security Council and Board are very different,” he said. “And as the basis is different, the consequences are different.”
Amano said that going forward, the agency would only release reports that are consistent with the most recent Security Council resolutions on Iran, meaning that future reports are likely to impact the international community’s ability to determine if Iran is fully complying with its end of the agreement.
Last month’s report was viewed as particularly significant because it allowed the nuclear agreement to proceed to its implementation stage. However, the dearth of information in it has angered some experts.
The latest report “provides insufficient details on important verification and monitoring issues,” Olli Heinonen, the IAEA’s former deputy director general, stated in a policy brief.
“The report does not list inventories of nuclear materials and equipment or the status of key sites and facilities,” Heinonen said in his analysis, which was published by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Without detailed reporting, the international community cannot be sure that Iran is upholding its commitments under the nuclear deal.”
The IAEA’s latest report also failed to disclose information about Iran’s stockpiles of low-enriched uranium, which is supposed to be significantly reduced as part of the nuclear deal.
Additional information about Iran’s nuclear centrifuges, the machines responsible for enriching uranium, also was withheld by the IAEA….

mortimer says
Shi’ites have a different view of ‘truthfulness’ than other people. Shi’ites are raised in a taqiyya culture. Taqiyya becomes second nature…everybody does it! However, to become a mullah, you need an post-grad degree in taqiyya. Ayatollahs go for the taqiyya PhD and then go post-doctoral. In Iran, no one believes anyone else…so why should we believe them about anything?
Westman says
Does this look suspicious and unreported by government?
http://www.banadirpost.com/2016/03/07/weapons-seized-australia-may-come-iran/
linnte says
So, basically, a deal was made, then implemented, but a clause in the deal says that once implemented, no pertinent information is to be disclosed. THAT IS ridiculous! So Iran has us by the kohones! This smug bastards!
rabrooks says
Agreements are only as good as the two parties involved. A guarantee is only good as the party who makes it. Either way, once again, only a total IDIOT would sign either one without reading it first.
How many time can they run this same shit down and expect to get away with it? Is “bathhouse barry” teaching negotiating skills to other countries?
Angemon says
Where and when will the buck stop?
Florida Jim says
Trump is correct once again the Iran deals was made by fools for fools and America is getting shafted by our state Department , United Nations and Iran