Of course. Who else could have done it? Islamic supremacists never, ever take responsibility for any wrongdoing. It’s all always someone else’s fault. Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani could have done some good: he could have examined the Islamic texts and teachings that jihadis use to justify violence and supremacism, and proposed ways to counter the jihadis’ interpretations of them. But we never see that happening. Instead, this:
“Indian Islamic Cleric: ISIS ‘Was Brought Into Being By Jews, Christians, Western Powers, And Islam’s Enemies,'” MEMRI, March 1, 2016:
In recent articles, Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, an internationally renowned Islamic cleric from India, has argued that the Islamic State (ISIS) was created by Jews, Christians, Western powers, and Islam’s enemies.
A lengthy piece titled “ISIS: You Are such [A Friend] Who Even Leaves Behind The Foe” was published in two parts on two successive Fridays, January 1 and January 8, 2016, in the prominent Urdu-language daily Roznama Inquilab. In it, he argued that ISIS is an offshoot of Al-Qaeda, and adds: “It is clear as day that the U.S. is the power that strengthened Osama bin Laden and created Al-Qaeda.”
The following are excerpts from the article:
“Israel And The Western Powers Are Conspiracy Experts… [But] After A While They Expose Their Own Conspiracies”
“…It is difficult to establish the date of [ISIS’s] formation because no movement comes into being and reaches a position where it can be noticed by all with the stroke of a pen. This is true for ISIS, but it is also well-accepted that it is rooted in Al-Qaeda, which was founded by Osama bin Laden in 1990 [sic; Al-Qaeda was founded in 1988 in Peshawar]. With the help of the U.S and the Western powers, Osama launched jihad in Afghanistan, taking it to the point where a superpower like Russia had no option but to leave…”
“Three things are important and noteworthy about ISIS. Firstly, who brought this blood-shedding movement into being? Secondly, what are its ideologies and activities? Thirdly, what is the position of its views and deeds in light of the Koran and Hadith [traditions of the Prophet Muhammad]?
“The answer to the first question is evident – this movement was brought into being by Jews, Christians, Western powers, and Islam’s enemies… It is clear as day that the U.S. is the power which strengthened Osama bin Laden and created Al-Qaeda, and it also did not keep its help a secret. Instead, it helped [Al-Qaeda] openly because it wanted to disgrace its opponent power, Russia. Therefore, after a secret Pentagon report was published, it was established that the U.S., Britain, France, Israel and other Western governments not only endorsed Al-Qaeda’s type of methodology but also oversaw it. From the belly of that organization, ISIS was gradually born…
“Only a few days ago, a U.S. commander’s statement that they trained ISIS [was reported] in newspapers. IN 2013, Edward Snowden, leaking NSA reports, said that the U.S., Israel, and Britain created ISIS… Snowden further said that Israel trained [ISIS leader] Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi… [It was also reported] in newspapers that some of ISIS’s wounded were treated in Israel. Besides, only the U.S and Israel could provide the modern technology that ISIS is using. The Muslims are so backward in such resources that it cannot be expected from them that they would create such things. Israel and the Western powers are conspiracy experts… but after a while they expose their own conspiracies, and it is not too much to attribute to such cunning people…
“The real work of creating, strengthening, and promoting this fitna [mischief of ISIS] is being carried out by the Western powers, especially Israel. Also, it is Israel and Syria that are benefiting the most from the rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Apparently, its end result would be this: that Iraq and Syria will be divided into small pieces so that there could be no Arab neighbor to even raise its eyes towards Israel.”…
Rahmani then goes on to liken the Islamic State to the Khawarij, an ancient Islamic group that considered all other Muslims to be heretics and apostates. He concludes:
“The third question is about the Islamic teachings regarding ISIS’s activities. This needs to be clearly explained. The first and basic ideology of ISIS, according to them, is: Anyone who abandons any practice of Islam or commits a sin is no longer a Muslim and becomes an infidel. This is totally wrong…
This claim is contradicted by the fact that the Islamic State amputates the hands of thieves. If it actually believed that anyone who commits a sin has become an Infidel, it would kill the thieves instead, since there is in Islam a death penalty for apostasy.
“ISIS’s second basic concept is that the killing of those who are deprived of faith and are infidel is allowed, and that their property is Halal, and that even enslaving their women is allowed. This is a very wrong concept; it is a conspiracy to defame and disgrace Muslims. The Koran calls for jihad only against those who are fighting with Muslims; there too there are limits that should not be crossed.
“Therefore, Allah says: Fight in the path of Allah with them who fight against you, and do not transgress, because Allah does not like the transgressors (Chapter Al-Baqrah, Verse 190)…”
The Qur’an doesn’t allow only for defensive warfare, but also offensive warfare to establish the hegemony of Islam and the Sharia (cf. 8:39, 9:29). And the idea that enslaving the women of Infidels is a “wrong concept” is contradicted by Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, and 70:30, which make it clear that Muslim men can have sexual relations with the “captives of the right hand,” and that those are Infidel women captured and enslaved as spoils of war.

Peter Buckley says
Anyone who claims that IS are not Islamic, should be politely asked to watch the evidence laid out here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKH-sInknQM
Needless to say, DW wins the argument hands down………….
Mirren10 says
The depressing thing about this, is all the anti-Western pundits, apologists,leftists, anti-Semites, and useful idiots, who will nod their heads sagely, and agree with this manifest nonsense.
mohammed created this foul cult **14500** years ago,, characterised by murder, theft, rape, torture, destruction and conquest, long before the USA existed, or the modern State of Israel. The IS is doing **exactly** what mohammed did, and exactly as the koran and hadiths mandate. But very few in the West will trouble themselves to read the texts, and study the course of islamic conquest and devastation.
If they did *that*, they would be forced to come to grips with what is happening, all over the Western world, acknowledge we are in a **war**, and take action. *None* of our so-called ‘leaders” has the moral courage to do this.
And the result will be bloody civil war on the streets of Europe.
LeeJai Cook says
3-12-2016. Roaring Springs, Texas USA. There will also be a bloody Civil War on the streets of America. The carnage will be well-nigh unbelievable. Millions will die.
Pat says
I am not a Muslim and I still know the prophet Mohammed was from 600 ad and not 14500 years ago
john spielman says
let’s CUT THE CRAP!
ISIS is islam at it’s “finest” and purest form, for it mimics its founder the great (sarc) muhammed, the supreme narcissist and false prophet mass murderer thief liar misogynist and pedophile pervert that all muslims adore and try and emulate as a “perfect man”. islam sanctifies (makes holy) all that is evil in this world for allah has all the attributes of Satan of the Bible. Even islamic paradise is evil- a drunken whorehouse that puts Sodom and Gomorrah to shame. And who in their right mind would advocate drinking camel’s urine to prevent disease or sex with a CORPSE- muhammed, of course
mortimer says
Thanks for this from JS: “ISIS is Islam at it’s “finest” and purest form”
Jay Boo says
This is what happens when MSNBC, BBC, and CNN give Islam a free pass.
In spite of their ‘Free Pass’ Muslims still insist on ‘hoping the fence’ in a display of shameless arrogance and feelings of entitlement to unaccountability.
celticwarriorcanada says
Even from the most Elementary Perspective ! One of the basic tenants of islam appears to be THE PRINCIPLE OF BLAME SHIFTING . Even in their most PREDESTINARIAN MOMENT ! St Augustine, Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin , English and Scottish Protestants, Etc STILL HAVE ROOM for INDIVIDUAL HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY ! Which is the BASIC FOUNDATION of THE SYSTEM OF LAW AND ORDER IN DEMOCRACIES!!! Islam with its WE ARE THE BEST OF PEOPLE ideology(APPEARS!) to blame EVERYTHING ON THE INFIDELS and APOSTATES ! P. S.EVEN AT ITS (WORST!) THE JUDAEO CHRISTIAN WORLD VIEW IS AKBAR!!!
Jay Boo says
Islam was brought into being sociopath who was so evil that he was possibly abandoned by his own mother to live with his other relatives.
What a selfish hateful brat he must have been!
His own mother hated him, apparently.
duh_swami says
Not all conspiracy theories are theories, some of them are actualities…The trick is in sorting the wheat from the chaff…
Allah created ISIS with a little help from his friends, Gabriel,Mahound,,,
ISIS is the battle of Badr or Khaybar fought over and over,,,
Endless warfare for Allah and virgins,,,Quran 2:191-3, 8:39 are the marching orders with no expiration date, the rest of it is details…
mortimer says
Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani is an example of how Islam destroys rationality in a person. After years of studying Islam’s contradictory fabrications, Rahmani and his fellow mullahs lose touch with reality, but I think eventually they come to realize how absurd it all is. At that point, they are old and do not want to lose their pensions, so they say nothing.
Rahmani is grasping at straws, trying every way possible to disculpate Islam without being called an apostate himself. ISIS is led by a PhD in Islamic studies who is one of the best informed mullahs in the world. If Caliph al Baghdadi does not understand Islam correctly, then no one does.
Rahmani’s desperate attempts to let Islam off the hook are absurd and won’t be believed by any Muslims. His disinformation is intended for the dirty kafirs whom he gratuitously insults.
Rahmani insults the West so he will not be a target of ISIS himself, though he could be if keeps criticizing them.
Biff H says
“Say: Are those who know and those who don’t know equal?” [Qur’an 39:9].
According to the Qur’an “…Islam’s enemies…” are led astray by whom Allah wills. The end result is a de facto partnership between Allah and Shaytan that guarantees there will be fitnah in the land. The purpose of fitnah is to test the faithful, but it’s not really a test because the fate of every Muslim has been written in the backbone of their father (Or mother’s womb as Hadith accounts conflict on the matter) so Muhammadanians are merely actors in a scripted play.
Has Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani come to the realization the root cause of his beef begins with Allah? It appears his fate is to selectively abandon reason.
Angemon says
Is ISIS islamic?
Ciudadano says
This is disinformation for Muslim consumption, Islam PR for Muslims. They don’t want hesitant Muslims to think Isis evil has something to do with Islamic scriptures and traditions.
Custos Custodum says
The man’s name Saifullah (written Saif-Allah in Arabic) means “sword of Allah.”
Arabic is NOT an official language anywhere in India.
Can you imagine he screeches of Leftist outrage if a Christian cleric named “Sword of God” tried to publish his opinions, perhaps even – gasp! – casting doubt on the Sacrament of Abortion or the Doctrine of Infallibility of ex cathedra Leftist pronouncements?
Demsci says
I too have noticed that Muslims will take no responsibility and blame outsiders for what is wrong.
I so far never came across a Muslim who dared admit that Islam is somehow at fault, or interpretable as one wishes it to be, when one cherry picks.
If it is one of Islam’s TENETS, derived from Quran, that Islam is CLEAR, then yes, Muslims face the stark choice of either agreeing with Islamic State or, if they can’t, declare Islamic State is not Islamic. And then blame the Kuffar enemies for creating it, among “innocent Muslims”. But I translate that word “Innocent” into “childish, animal-like, crazy” because I believe all humans and certainly all human groups/ with their leaders do have responsibilities and are never totally “innocent”.
At the heart of this man’s denial is, IMO, the Islamic tenet of clarity of Islam, also in the big picture, with consistency and without contradiction. Which no Muslim can ever deny, without being declared an apostate. (But which at the same time is manifestly false).
I think that is why this man desperately tries to shift the blame from Islam to “Kuffar enemies; Israel, America.
UNCLE VLADDI says
The only part he got right was that “Western Powers” bit, if he meant that ISILam was deliberately established by the wannabe global caliph, MuBarak Hussein Obsama.
The paper trail of weapons receipts seized by countries near Turkey prove it.
David says
I beg to differ! ISIL (aka: the SATANIC STATE) was brought into being by (a.) A group of insane and psycopathic LUNATICS! OR (b.) Is actualy a work of Satan himself.
I think those are the only possible explanations.
It appears, without a doubt that, the orgin of the bloody, penis worship cult know as Mohammedanism, was began/inspired by SATAN or is of demonic origin. Or, also accepted as likely, the human founder was an insane and psycopathic swine.
Why anyone NOW, in the 21st century would not see this, or have anything to do with it, is a deep and profound mystery.
It should certainly NOT been allowed to enter the United States.
It is NOT a “religion” and deserves no constitutional protections! Harmless tree worshippers are more welcome to come here then the insane followers of Mohammed!!!!