• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Rubio: “Anywhere in the world you’re going see American men and women serving us in uniform that are Muslims”

Mar 13, 2016 11:27 am By Robert Spencer

Said Rubio: “If you go anywhere in the world you’re going see American men and women serving us in uniform that are Muslims. Anyone out there that has the uniform of the United States on and is willing to die for this country is someone that loves America.”

Great. But there is reason to be concerned. Does any other demographic have as high a rate of treason as Muslims in the U.S. military? In 2003, a convert to Islam, Sgt. Hasan Akbar, murdered two of his commanding officers in Kuwait. In 2009, Major Nidal Malik Hasan murdered 13 Americans at Fort Hood.

Other than those attacks, a Muslim in the U.S. Navy discussed sniper attacks on military personnel. A Muslim U.S. naval engineer allegedly gave an Egyptian agent information on how to sink a U.S. carrier. In 2015, a Muslim National Guard soldier in Illinois planned an Islamic State jihad attack against a U.S. military base. Last February, a U.S. Army enlistee who vowed to “bring the Islamic State straight to your doorstep” pleaded guilty to attempting to detonate a car bomb at Fort Riley military base in Kansas. Just days ago, a U.S. Air Force veteran was convicted of trying to join the Islamic State.

Then there is the U.S. Muslim who gave the Islamic State U.S. military uniforms, combat boots, tactical gear, firearms accessories, and thousands in cash. Where are those uniforms now?

It is good that there are Muslims in the U.S. military who are loyal. But can we have a discussion about those who aren’t, and why they aren’t, and what can be done about it? Also, Rubio made these statements in response to Trump’s saying that “Islam hates us.” His answer is a non-sequitur. The fact that there are loyal Muslims in the military doesn’t tell us anything about whether or not Islam has teachings mandating hatred of and violence against unbelievers, because these Muslim military personnel may not be acting in accord with them. But no one seems to be able to think clearly about this issue.

Marco Rubio

“Donald Trump’s Islam Comments Draw Attacks As Republicans Discover Civility,” Reuters, March 12, 2016:

Miami: US Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump came under fire from his rivals on Thursday for saying Muslims hate the United States at a debate where the gut-punching attacks of earlier forums gave way to a suddenly civil tone with a serious focus on the issues….

But he stuck to positions that many establishment Republicans reject, such as his belief, as stated in television interviews, that followers of Islam “hate us.”

“We have a serious problem of hate. There is tremendous hate,” said Trump, who has proposed a temporary ban on Muslims entering the United States.

Rubio, Cruz and Kasich said the United States needs to maintain good relations with Muslim countries in the Middle East to help in the fight against Islamic State militants.

“We are going to have to work with people in the Muslim faith even as Islam faces a serious crisis within it,” Rubio said.

Rubio also defended American Muslims as patriots.

“If you go anywhere in the world you’re going see American men and women serving us in uniform that are Muslims,” he said.

“Anyone out there that has the uniform of the United States on and is willing to die for this country is someone that loves America,” he added….

Trump, in discussing how he would consider placing between 20,000 to 30,000 US troops on the ground to defeat ISIS terrorists, vowed to complete the mission quickly and bring troops home to focus on rebuilding the United States.

“We really have no choice, we have to knock out ISIS,” Trump said. “I would listen to the generals, but I’m hearing numbers of 20,000 to 30,000.”

It was the most detailed view yet of Trump’s thinking about ISIS. He has previously talked of “knocking the hell” out of ISIS without offering specifics….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Moderate Muslims Tagged With: Donald Trump, Marco Rubio


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Moses says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:31 am

    Even if I am not American I wouldn’t want to see that guy as the next U.S. president.DONALD TRUMP ALL THE WAY!!!!

    • Christianblood says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 11:53 am

      Moses posted:

      (…DONALD TRUMP ALL THE WAY!!!!…)

      A Very Huge Amen to That!
      A vote for Donald Trump is a vote against the crazed establishment of worldwide political-correctness. It is a vote for sanity, for common sense and for the TRUTH.
      May He Win Decisively!

      • John Stefan Obeda says

        Mar 15, 2016 at 9:02 pm

        I’m an American citizen from Chicago living in Ontario and my wife and I still vote by absentee ballot. I’m voting for Trump because I trust him to effectively deal with our enemy the fifth columnists. the Islamists, who are a great danger in our country and I trust that he will undue much of the damage that the half-baked Islamist Obama has done in office. I vote for Trump in spite of my dear wife who refuses to vote for him. First time ever that we’re splitting the vote.

    • Jay Boo says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 6:11 pm

      Marco Rubio attacked trump — after protesters attacked Trump’s campaign event and right to free speech.

      Traitor Rubio climbed in bed with Muslim Leftist thugs.
      That is something you just don’t do — EVER

      We don’t need that little traitorous twerp as President of the US, kissing carpets along side Justin Trudeau in Canada.

      • Adrian says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 7:49 pm

        Little Marco went off my radar as soon as he made that fawning pro-Islam comment during the last debate… he is just another apparatchik for his handlers, and acts like a petulant schoolboy – he is like Pedro in Napoleon Dynamite running for class president, small in stature and small in integrity.

        And then he just throws spitballs along with Lyin’ Ted Cuz at Trump, the ONLY man to publicly open up the can of worms of Islam.

        • R says

          Mar 14, 2016 at 3:18 am

          Ben Carson did it first and he knows why Islam hates us. Trump doesn’t.

    • Mo says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 10:57 pm

      @ Moses

      “Even if I am not American I wouldn’t want to see that guy as the next U.S. president.DONALD TRUMP ALL THE WAY!!!!”

      And Trump will do… what, exactly?

      Good grief, you Trump cultists are worse than the Obama ones of 08! Unbelievable!

      • R says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 3:21 am

        I’m not a Trump supporter but how about not support the Muslim Brotherhood every chance he gets, actually fight ISIS, call Islamic jihad what it is? That right there is an improvement over Obama.

    • Mary says

      Mar 14, 2016 at 5:11 am

      I’m from aussie and DAMN right trump. You know what my lecturer said to me ? That terrorism in statistics is low and is nothing to worry about and that it’s made bigger than what it is. He said that no catholic should vote for trump because he is going to build a wall which does not take care of humanitarian needs for the Mexicans.

      He completely misunderstood trump. Completely. I don’t understand it. I’m catholic I vote trump. I don’t care what Francis has to say because as Pope he failed. Christians are slaughtered and he has DONE nothing to resolve it. So much for caring for our brothers.

      They say love your enemies like you do your brothers. And yet they can’t even love their brothers first.

      Hypocrisy. Sick of it.

      • maghan says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 2:34 pm

        What humanitarian needs of Mexicans? A big country with lots of resources and a sizable population to boot. What more does the Spanish oligarchy in Mexico need to develop Mexico and stem the shameful tide of the “sans papeles” across the border?

  2. Angemon says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:35 am

    Rubio, Cruz and Kasich said the United States needs to maintain good relations with Muslim countries in the Middle East to help in the fight against Islamic State militants.

    How’s that working out so far?

    Trump, in discussing how he would consider placing between 20,000 to 30,000 US troops on the ground to defeat ISIS terrorists, vowed to complete the mission quickly and bring troops home to focus on rebuilding the United States.

    Under which rules of engagement? Would those troops be allowed to act on their own and react to the situation on the scene or would they be forced to wait until the enemy shot them before radioing HQ and ask whether or not they could fire back?

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 11:59 am

      Easy. Under Gen Patraeus they “fought” under the Hearts and Minds ROE, where sometimes a squadron had to be left to die for fear of offending a Moslem goatherd in the mountains. Those rules of engagement. The general lives wearing an ankle bracelet now as penance of divulging several pages of state secrets to gain favor with his reporter girlfriend. Our next president Hillary put tens of thousands of state secrets on a private server to avert FOIA transparency, and was apprently hacked by foreign governments. How else would about 50 mujahidin know to show up at the Benghazi facility with mortars and RPGs at the same time the Ambassador arrived? The dead ambassador’s mission is still a closely held secret, but his schedule was widely known that fateful night of his homosexual anal gang rape death.

      Hillary operates by those rules of engagement; our soldiers operate by a much more restrictive set of rules.

      • Jerry says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 2:53 am

        Actually Biliary Clinton is too much in the pocket of the Qataris, thus don’t be surprised if you find that they had the admin password for her server.

        She even had a relatively inoffensive incarcerated because he dared issue a video that disclosed some offensive dictates and deeds of the Plundere for Profit, PBUH (P..s Be Upon Him).

  3. Jose Rosario says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:41 am

    He is my Senator but I am working for Ted Cruz as a volunteer because Rubio is a lying S.O.B.

  4. Joey says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:42 am

    I am pasting this….

    CAN GOOD MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS?

    This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start
    to finish, and send it on to everyone.

    Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not
    speaking out about any atrocities.

    Can a good Muslim be a good American?

    Supposedly this question was forwarded to a someone who worked
    in Saudi Arabia for 20 years and possessed a lot of knowledge
    regarding Islam.

    The following is his reply:

    Theologically – no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the
    moon god of Arabia.

    Religiously – no. Because no other religion is accepted by his
    Allah except Islam. (Quran, 2:256) (Koran)

    Scripturally – no. Because his allegiance is to the five
    Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

    Geographically – no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to
    which he turns in prayer five times a day.

    Socially – no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to
    make friends with Christians or Jews.

    Politically – no. Because he must submit to the Mullahs
    (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and
    destruction of America, the great Satan.

    Domestically – no. Because he is instructed to marry four women
    and to beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran
    4:34 )

    Intellectually – no. Because he cannot accept the American
    Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he
    believes the Bible to be corrupt.

    Philosophically – no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran
    does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy
    and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either
    dictatorial or autocratic.

    Spiritually – no. Because when we declare ‘one nation under
    God,’ The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is
    NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called
    love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.

    Therefore, after much study and deliberation. Perhaps we should
    be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They
    obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans.

    Call it what you wish it’s still the truth and you had better
    believe it.

    The more who understand this, the better it will be for our
    country and our future.

    The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.
    Footnote: The Muslims have said they will dominate us or kill
    us if we don’t submit.

    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE, and ours is in terrible danger, from Islam
    and those Socialists in Washington that submit to Islam.

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 12:42 pm

      If a person says he is a Muslim that means he must believe every word in the Quran is from Allah … and therefore, the Muslim owes his highest allegiance to Allah. He must also believe Muhammad was the final and ultimate Prophet of Allah and the “perfect man.” Just read the Quran and study the life and sayings of Muhammad to find out what a Muslim in a U.S. military uniform must ultimately believe in and support. It is NOT the Constitution of the United States of America. The Muslim’s allegiance to the laws of Allah must come before the laws of men. The Muslim may follow the laws of men only until he is powerful enough to help make Allah’s laws the supreme law … and he must work towards that goal in whatever manner possible …. including by use of deceit if it furthers the cause of Allah and Islam.

    • panmelia says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 2:50 pm

      This is a very convincing analysis, Joey, and i would not trust any muslim with the safety and security of my country, nor to wear the Queen’s uniform or swear allegiance to her and mean it.

      Why is Trump saying that islam hates America causing such a fuss with hypocrites tutting and fussing? As far back as I remember, the USA has been referred to as ‘the Great Satan’ by muslims, and the UK as ‘the Little Satan’. That sort of gave me the impression that they did not like us much.

      There are some mealy-mouthed idiots who simply don’t like the truth: these people should not be the next President for the sake and survival of the Western world.

      In the UK we started allowing the enemy within the gate a long time ago, and the cowardly politicians dare not admit their mistakes. If you in the States have a chance to vote for a man who says it as he sees it, you are lucky people.

      • mortimer says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 3:22 pm

        Panmelia wrote: “Why is Trump saying that islam hates America causing such a fuss with hypocrites?”

        Those ‘hypocrites’ are uninformed about the Islamic APARTHEID DOCTRINE…

        Al Walaa wal Baraa is the best supported doctrine in Islam. Al Walaa wal Baraa is the doctrine of Islamic apartheid.

        Koran 28:86 “Do not support the kafireen in any way.”
        Koran 5.51 “He amongst you who turns to them (for friendship) is of them.”
        Koran 40:35 “They who dispute the signs (verses) of Allah without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers.” (Note: not just “hated”, but “greatly hated”.)
        Koran 48:29: “Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are violent to the unbelievers, but compassionate to one another.”
        Koran 4: 101 “The kuffar are for you a clear enemy.”
        Koran 8:60 “Terrorize the enemy of Allah and your enemy”
        Koran 60:4 “We have rejected you, and there has arisen between us and you enmity and hatred, until you believe and worship Allaah alone.”
        Koran 3: 118 “O you who believe! Do not take into your intimacy those outside your ranks. They will not fail to corrupt you.”

        Examples of al-Baraa from historic figures:

        -from Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”

        -from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show animosity and hatred towards disbelievers and never support them.”

        -from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, “Belief in Allah”: “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as enemies and hate them because of their kufr, just as he hates their kufr (disbelief) itself.”

        -from “The Islaamic Concept of al-Walaa’ wal-Baraa’” by Khalid El-Gharib: …“[iv] to show enmity to those who show enmity to Allaah and His Messenger”
        (Note: Muslims are to visibly demonstrate their enmity or hatred towards the kufaar)

        -from a lecture given by Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal (H.A.): “The implication of al-Baraa is that one hates for the sake of Allah (SWT)…Al-Baraa means to recognize who your enemies are and to hate them and exterminate them in their Endeavour to get rid of your Deen, al-Islam…Al-Baraa is to hate the people who propagate Baatil (falsehood)—the Muslim should hate them and (at least desire to) kill them when the time comes.”

        • Jay Boo says

          Mar 13, 2016 at 7:10 pm

          @jack boot mortimer, spamming off topic again to show off his begrudging authority figure worshipping ADMIRATION of the supremacist Muslim point of view

          — I HAVE HEARD IT SAID from mortmer time and time again that —

          Terrorize our enemy the Muslims
          Muslims are our clear enemy.
          We should be violent to the Muslims , but compassionate to one another.
          Do not support the Muslims in any way.
          Whoever turns to them (for friendship) is of them.
          Muslims will not fail to corrupt us.
          Our honor lies in insulting the filthy Muslims.
          One who respects the Muslims dishonors us all.
          Humiliate Muslims . They should constantly remain terrified and trembling.
          Hold Muslims under contempt.
          One should hate them and (at least desire to) kill them when the time comes.
          Womenfolk should not shake hands with the Muslims because that would make them unclean.
          The Muslim is available to be killed, his property appropriated, his womenfolk and children enslaved.

          We have no other choice

          the non-Muslim should hate them and (at least desire to) kill them when the time comes.
          ———————–

          Of course I took the liberty of swapping the Muslims role as DIRTY enemy in my plagiarism of his repeated proselytizing of the Islamic point of view.
          Other than that it is Mortimer word for word.

          Muhammad was a disgraceful lying buffoon.
          Islam is a vile JOKE
          It deserves no respect at all.
          Let me repeat

          Islam and its buffoon Muhammad deserves no respect at all.

  5. Lisa Graas says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:44 am

    It’s good that you point these things out and call for a discussion but I support Marco Rubio for president based on his national security experience, among other things.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 12:01 pm

      Marco has no national security experience, except for his calls as a freshman senator to put our soldiers in harm’s way to win a fictive enemy called Radical Islamic Terrorists. That’s some real nasty experience.

      • Porky The Crusader says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 2:18 pm

        ‘his national security experience, among other things’ Thank you for the laugh Lisa, i like your humor 😉

  6. Adrian says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 11:48 am

    Little Marco showed his true colors:

    A craven panderer without any convictions…

  7. Hope says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 12:03 pm

    I have 2 points to make:

    1. Trump did not say that Muslims hate America. He said that Islam hates us. And he is correct in identifying a supremacist, totalitarian ideology that has at its core extreme hatred of freedom and individual liberty.

    2. The article states “we need to maintain good relations with Muslim countries in the Middle East to help in the fight against Islamic State militants.” Assuming this is true, why does maintaining good relations with Muslim countries always involve a complete and total moratorium on criticism of any kind? Certainly we have “good relations” with non-Muslim countries all over the world, yet we criticize them and they criticize us. Yet Muslims and Islam must always be protected, it seems, from hearing any facts or statistics that reflect badly on them.

    Do Rubio, Cruz, and Kasich not realize the danger we face, or are they hoping that appeasement and political correctness will eventually help smooth things over between the West and Islam?

    • pdxnag says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 1:42 pm

      We should not sugar coat an unabashed demand that the people held hostage to Islamic beliefs in “Muslim” countries expel Islam and Sharia from their government. Totalitarianism does not become less monstrous if you sprinkle a little religious perpetual life belief onto it.

      The slaves of Islam deserve to live free. Don’t concede that they, and all future generations, shall be slaves forever.

      The Islamic exemption from Eleanor Roosevelt’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” as embodied in the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” must be pilloried at every turn until the Organization of Islamic Conference is vanquished. This of course means that any “Muslim” can cease to be a Muslim, it is not a biologically immutable characteristic any more than is slavery itself.

  8. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    Marco puts forth membership in our military as proof of loyalty. By that logic members of the federal bureaucracy are also loyal Americans, when in fact they are nothing of the sort.

    Moslems are by self-definition incapable of loyalty to any secular state, it’s right there in the scriptures. They are least likely to be loyal to America, which by its own self-definition is supposed to be about freedom, which Moslems hate. So allowing Moslems in our military only assures continued acts of disloyalty and murder, and the hastened transfer of military knowledge to ISIS, Al Qaeda and other Moslem activist groups.

    • Charli Main says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 12:55 pm

      “Marco puts forth membership in our military as proof of loyalty”
      Not my place to criticize American politicians because we have more than own share of retarded Islamo-ignorant politicians.
      Muslims have NO loyalty to any of the social, political and security organisations of any non- Islamic country that they live in.
      What Muslims are expert in is the concept of Muruna, where Islam encourages them to blend in with their non-Muslim hosts and their surroundings in order to deceive them
      Rubio has been well and truly played for a sucker.!!!!!

  9. Bezelel says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 12:13 pm

    Little marco will never know what it’s like to share a foxhole with someone you aren’t sure about. PC is no way to survive combat. Egypt and Jordan are showing promise, but it has nothing to do with islam.

  10. JoAnn says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 12:15 pm

    It is imperative that our future president understand the threat that Islam poses. It appears, perhaps, that you think Trump is that man. If so, you are not the only one, as I see Jeff Sessions and other conservatives backing him. There is certainly a divide, though, as many do not trust Trump, including myself.
    I support Cruz, and though he has pushed for a 6 month moratorium on immigration, I admit there is still some doubt in my mind that he will address the issue to the degree it needs to be addressed. Still, I trust that he will abide by our constitution, something I fear Trump knows little about. It is a gamble. And time will tell…

  11. celticwarriorcanada says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 12:21 pm

    Teenie Weenie Marco Zeenie !!! This ALBERTAN Stands with Trump !!! P.S. Ya REALLY Disappoint me Ted !! And here I THOUGHT a Good Christian man like you Believed IN The First Amendment . America and the world NEEDS A DONALD TRUMP, not another Lawyer ! Donald Trump Actually Practices FREE SPEECH , while you and your LEFT WING REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT COMRADES ATTACK TRUMP”S SPEECH and Are INTERFERING, In a DEMOCRATIC ELECTION . You Act MORE LIKE The Left Wing Canadian Lunatics I have To Put UP With!!! Grow up YOU SORE LOSSERS , Endorse Trump and get on with it . TRUMPS GONNA WIN ANYWAYS !!! And YOU ACT LIKE BERNIE IN DISGUISE LITTLE MARCO !!! AN ALBERTAN’S OPINION !!!

    • scherado says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 12:29 pm

      What did “Ted” do to disappoint you?–assuming you know.

      • Adrian says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 12:32 pm

        Ted’s laughable, ‘soul-searching’ and o-so-serious performance on TV sniping at Trump

        what a lousy actor!

        • celticwarriorcanada says

          Mar 13, 2016 at 3:42 pm

          HAY SHERADO !!!Ted and Rubio JOIN WITH THE LEFT in ATTACKING TRUMP’S RHETORIC: THEY ARE IN ESSENCE ATTACKING FREE SPEECH: Go to the DOCTOR AND GET EARS CLEANED OUT . ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS IN THE END ARE NO BETTER THAN HILARY AND BERNIE !! SO MAYBE I DO KNOW AND MAYBE THIS ALBERTAN IS A BETTER AMERICAN than some SO CALLED AMERICANS ARE!!!

      • dlbrand says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 3:25 am

        In the wake of the Ben Carson high-profile remarks on Islam, in a Jake Tapper interview, I heard Cruz assert, he would definitely fight for the Muslim’s right to practice their religion in our nation.

        Then, in another clip, Cruz asserts, any Muslims engaging in jihad is signing his death sentence.

        In light of his above cited assertion’s, Cruz is either plum ignorant on Islam—and if so, inexcusably so—or he is well aware of Islam, including all its tenets, and at ease in siding in defense of them, as well as at ease with speaking out of both sides of his mouth.

        Why is he not questioned on the above? Which statement does he stand by? Because his two assertions cited above directly oppose one another.

        By which one does Cruz stand?

    • Mo says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 11:00 pm

      @ celticwarriorcanada

      “Teenie Weenie Marco Zeenie !!! This ALBERTAN Stands with Trump !!! P.S. Ya REALLY Disappoint me Ted !! And here I THOUGHT a Good Christian man like you Believed IN The First Amendment . America and the world NEEDS A DONALD TRUMP, not another Lawyer ! Donald Trump Actually Practices FREE SPEECH , while you and your LEFT WING REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT COMRADES ATTACK TRUMP”S SPEECH and Are INTERFERING, In a DEMOCRATIC ELECTION . You Act MORE LIKE The Left Wing Canadian Lunatics I have To Put UP With!!! Grow up YOU SORE LOSSERS , Endorse Trump and get on with it . TRUMPS GONNA WIN ANYWAYS !!! And YOU ACT LIKE BERNIE IN DISGUISE LITTLE MARCO !!! AN ALBERTAN’S OPINION !!!

      Oh, stop shrieking. And don’t tell me how to vote.

      And this post was about Marco Rubio, not Ted.

  12. Timothy N. Hunter says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    REAL NEWS THAT NEVER GETS COVERAGE:I was a Financial Officer in the US Foreign Service when five or six GUNMEN invaded my office in the Office of International Financial Services, US State Department. They also threatened my supervisor and ordered him to order me to “clean out my desk” and leave immediately (which I did). The GUNMEN had no warrants or “paper work” to justify their actions… They showed up several days after I had spoken to a group of FBI agents and a “Washington Post” reporter about a small meeting in which I had expressed my policy disagreements with the Clinton Administration. The Clintons had given nearly a $billion worth of free Boeing passenger aircraft to the al-Saud family of Saudi Arabia.

    There is a US government agency that is supposed to protect current and former Federal workers “from fraud, waste and abuse” BUT it is controlled by the Obama Administration (NAME:

    The US Office of Special Counsel) and OSC recently advised that they had done NOTHING on my original disclosure (in 1995) and that my current petitions (in 2015) are “old news”…The US CODE clearly shows that that the OSC is not limited by “old news” from taking action…

    I made other complaints: I had refused to provide the names of the Priest/Pastor and of lay Americans worshipping in an underground church in the American Consulate General in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia…

    I found this information was being supplied by the CIA to a colonel in Saudi G-2, secret police…

    I also discussed how Americans in Saudi Arabia “disappear” from time to time..and the US government ignores the complaints of their family members…

    that about 300 American citizen women and children were being held against their will by the Saudi government which the US Consuls were refusing to assist in returning to the USA…

    By now, millions of Americans have heard of these allegations and disclosures and Congress has not reacted in the slightest.

    One senator who did, was subsequently driven from office by a press campaign of innuendo and hysteria…

  13. Truth says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 1:39 pm

    About 20 serving with conviction. That only leaves 1.1 billion Muslims who hate the USA. Right Rubio?

  14. jan van Eechoud says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 2:14 pm

    No! You will nót, idiot!
    Unless the thickness of the koran is indeed reduced to a Donald Duck format!!

    Where they took out all the hate- and murder texts….!

  15. Westman says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 2:22 pm

    If you go anywhere in the world you’re going see British, French, Spanish, Russian, German, and Turk men and women serving their countries in uniform that are Muslims.

    This should stop Islamic Terrorism and bring peace to these countries in our time. Since Turkey is mostly Muslim this logic should be already proven by its peaceful past and one could conclude that the more Muslims a country has in the military, the less terrorism one can expect.

    If you believe this then you’re probably, Marco Rubio.

  16. wildjew says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 2:24 pm

    Is it just me? I am so tired or this apologist for Islam, Chris Wallace. Wallace undermines his credibility (when it comes to questioning Trump) after he begins with his defense of all things Islam. Can’t Fox find a better commentator than Wallace?

    • pdxnag says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 4:25 pm

      He’s giddy stupid. He’s got that Valley Girl quality that the network must want.

  17. Nelson Taylor Sol says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 2:33 pm

    For anyone listening the debates and really paying attention, it’s clear that Trump flip flops on every single issue ranging from immigration to foreign policy. If you think Trump won’t end up liking the buts of golf state leaders (many of them are his admitted clients) you are delusional. Trump has no principles and people will learn the hard way if the guy is elected. But then again, democracy it’s a bitch and mob rule sometimes is needed when it comes to teaching lessons.
    Ask Venezuelans whatever happened to their liberties when they followed Chavez, their false messiah. When some of us who lived under tyranny and and have a sharpened tyrant detector sense tried to warn them, their answer was: we are not Cubans, we are not going down your road to communism. I bet that will be the same answer Americans will give, out of dispair and wishful thinking.
    At least we Cubans have the sad merit of never electing Castro.
    Too bad that the whole world will have to pay the price for so much ignorance and boredom in the USA.
    Let’s see if “the conservative ” Trump, will keep “calling it like it is” one year from now from the Oval Office.

    • wildjew says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 2:38 pm

      “Trump has no principles and people will learn the hard way if the guy is elected.”

      Good point. Additionally, he is an authoritarian.

      • awake says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 3:02 pm

        Now Trump is an “authoritarian” and no longer a fascist in your opinion?

        • Mark Swan says

          Mar 13, 2016 at 6:02 pm

          Heck Let’s Just Give-Up…Let Mrs. Clinton Have it.

      • eduardo odraude says

        Mar 13, 2016 at 3:47 pm

        wildjew,

        If Trump is elected, the system will hold him in check if he doesn’t want to hold himself. Meanwhile, he seems to be the only candidate willing to move publicly toward the truth about Islam. You, as a Jew (I am partly myself), surely should care that between 100,000 and 250,000 Muslims are becoming part of the US each year. That surely is a disaster of major proportions for Jews, many of whom are totally asleep to what is unfolding for them. Do you want to worry in five years that religious Jews in the US will have to hide their religion in public lest some believing Muslim starts looking to kill Jews at random? I understand concerns about Trump and am not sure about him myself, but I believe the tripartite system of checks and balances will continue to work adequately, and he is the only candidate who is rejecting the intimidation, subjection, and suicide of non-Muslim culture.

        • Nelson Taylor Sol says

          Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 pm

          Just for your information, Trump has repeatedly said he is neutral between terrorism inducing Palestinian Authority and Israel. He wants to make a deal with terrorists, so you won’t have to wait too long for an increase of antisemitism to happen under a Trump presidency.

  18. wildjew says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    Marco Rubio, in league with Senators John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Lindsey Graham, was a cheerleader for the “Arab Spring,” and Muslim takeover of Egypt.

    Senators McCain, Graham, Ayotte had a one on one tête-à-tête with Muslim Brotherhood strongman, Mohamed Morsi, who called the Jews sons of apes and pigs. Rubio supported Obama’s policies in the region, in Egypt, his war in Libya aimed and assassinating Muammar Gaddafi, arming Syrian “rebels,” etc. More egrigious, Rubio joined John McCain condemning Michele Bachmann and her colleagues because they called for an investigation of Muslim Brotherhood penetration into the Obama regime. I regret voting for Rubio in 2010. I will not repeat the mistake.

  19. Richard Paulsen says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 3:05 pm

    Why is the muslim world not developing? Receiving so much help for years. Demanding, receiving never giving. Migration and developing islam instead of developing. Just growing worse.
    It could not be worse than it is. just one of all candidates running for president telling the truth. The others blaming him for him being attacked.
    Why do not all tell the truth? It is so obvious they are lying. Hopefully they are digging their own grave.

  20. mortimer says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 3:15 pm

    Rubio is guessing what Muslims in uniform believe. Has he done a lie detector test on each one? No.

    If I were presently in uniform, I would be concerned and looking around me at the Muslims every time I went anywhere. Will the Muslim beside be another Major Nidal Hasan? Will he turn his weapon on the line of soldiers on the rifle range? Will he burst into a lecture hall with a bomb?

    Rubio isn’t a soldier in a trench who has to wonder if the Muslim beside him will slit his throat and go over to the Taliban and bring the Taliban back to murder his platoon.

    • Mark Swan says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 6:14 pm

      Anyone Who Can Read and Claims To Be A Muslim…Gives A Good Reason To Be Skeptical.

    • Jay Boo says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 9:35 pm

      Mortimer you have it backwards,
      Muslims should be the ones looking over their shoulders in anticipation and wondering, will the non-Muslim beside me be another to reveal that Islam is nothing but a sick JOKE built from pedophile Muhammad’s disgrace.

  21. Champ says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    Rubio must be hard up for votes …

    And don’t forget:

    51% of U.S. Muslims want Sharia; 60% of young Muslims more loyal to Islam than to U.S.

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/51-of-u-s-muslims-want-sharia-60-of-young-muslims-more-loyal-to-islam-than-to-u-s

  22. eduardo odraude says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 pm

    I used to like Rubio, till he started saying foolish things about Muslims and Islam.

  23. abad says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 3:47 pm

    Rubio has the IQ of a garden slug. He’d be the first to kowtow and pander to Muslims.

    He should drop out of the presidential race.

    • Shmooviyet says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 5:06 pm

      Absolutely agreed.
      Who is ‘suggesting’ he make remarks such as these?? I smell a CAIR speechwriter.
      I would not want a spouse, child. friend, nor stranger to me sharing quarters, rifle range or anything else with a muslim fellow military member. Call me ‘phobic all the live-long day.

      Have to paraphrase Trump here…
      “Okay, little Marco.”

    • eduardo odraude says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 6:22 pm

      Rubio’s problem is not his IQ, which to judge by his eloquence is pretty high at least in terms of some types of conceptual and verbal aptitudes. His problem is somewhere else. Character? Gut instincts? Common sense? Experience? Who knows, but it’s not his IQ that is keeping him from noticing what is going on with Islam.

      • Pong says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 3:26 am

        May be he understands that the nomination race is over and is looking for some bones from a moslem table.
        It is inconceivable he was looking for moslem vote. They vote as a block and no republican can have a chance with them. Sanders is the closest to them, but as a jew, he stands no chance. Hilary will get 100% of their vote.
        Rubio is so much like McCain.

    • dlbrand says

      Mar 14, 2016 at 3:33 am

      Rubio is one among the lion’s share of our elected officials, and their respective followers, on their knees before their master, Islam.

  24. elizabeth says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    Saga Of A Moderate Muslim In US Uniform Gone Rogue – Remember His Victims & Never Forget:

    In June, 2007, US Army psychiatrist, Muslim Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan, gave a lecture emphasizing a raging conflict of loyalties in the US Muslim soldier’s mind, and warning that Muslims within the ranks of the US military could at any time go rogue, react violently against orders directing them to go overseas and participate in the killing of fellow Muslims. In Islam, Muslim-on-Muslim killing is no different than if a soldier were to turn his weapon on a fellow soldier in the same foxhole: it’s the 2nd worst sin in all of Islam (the Islamic law treatise, “Major Sins,” marks it as an utterly unforgivable sin, a sure ticket to the lowest hell). In conclusion, he offered the suggestion that the Department of Defense “should allow Muslim soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.”
    Two and a half years later, on Nov. 5, 2009, Maj. Hassan himself, shouting the Islamic battle-cry, “Allahu-Akbar” repeatedly, massacred 13 members of America’s armed forces at Fort Hood, wounding 32 others. Hassan later declared everlasting allegiance to ISIS. As a result of this jihadist atrocity, the State Department was forced to bow to Maj. Hassan’s warnings concerning Islam’s ruling against Muslim-on-Muslim killing; even to the point of permitting Muslims to “modify” how they recite the American oath of citizenship this year, 2015, to accommodate future Muslims who would object to serving in the US military on religious grounds, forever exempting them from military service.
    This is one example of how a non-Muslim-majority country can capitulate to Islamic terror and, in effect, institute an Islamic law above its own laws.

    • Mark Swan says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 7:29 pm

      Thank You elizabeth…None Of Us Should Forget What This Doctor Said And Did…
      Or The Rest Of What You Wrote.

    • Brandmr says

      Mar 13, 2016 at 9:01 pm

      May I cut and paste this elsewhere?

      • elizabeth says

        Mar 14, 2016 at 2:28 am

        You most certainly may! You can also include Maj. Hassan’s complete 2007 Powerpoint presentation online here: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/30/fort-hood-killer-warned-before-shooting-possible-adverse-events.html

        Here is an excellent summary of Hassan’s ominous Powerpoint warning in 2007:
        http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/11/nidal_hasans_own_words_in_powe.html

        Also recommended regarding this atrocity: Stephen Coughlin’s “Red Pill Brief” on YouTube.

  25. More Ham Ed says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 6:26 pm

    A few muslims (lowercase be upon them) around the world wear a U.S. uniform. But nearly 400 MILLION OF THEM around the world believe in the death penalty for leaving islam, according to a left-leaning 2013 secular poll, according to the populations of countries in the poll.

    http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia

  26. BlueRaven says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 6:47 pm

    There are several Republicans who have major investments in the Middle East, including Trump – most of them are backing Rubio. Rubio is just a puppet – a clown – a lying git – a lost boy.

    Though I don’t trust anyone of them, least of all Hillary, Trump appears to me to be the most credible of the lot, and on the ball.

  27. Wellington says

    Mar 13, 2016 at 9:00 pm

    Rubio’s a good man overall but he is clearly deficient where accurate knowledge of Islam is concerned. Would that such a basically decent man be an exception in this regard but, sadly, he is all too demonstrative of the state of thinking about Islam in our time by the bulk of Western political elites.

    It’s quite instructive how many accomplished or influential individuals in the West still continue to shill for an ideology, Islam, which in its theological blueprint is clearly an enemy of the best which the West has wrought over the centuries.. Let’s see here. This unfortunate list would include Rubio, Cruz, Kasich, Fiorina, Jeb Bush (apparently all other Bushes too), Cameron, May, Pope Francis, Trudeau of course, Obama to be sure——-ah, the list is a very, very, very long one. I wish it were a short one, for the West’s sake, for freedom’s sake. Alas, it is not.

    Think Rubio will ever get any of what I’ve written above? I don’t think so——or if he eventually does I think it could be filed away in the “too late category.”

    The West needs a whole new crop of leaders and not just someone like Trump who stumbles into the truth now and again. No, the West needs Lincolns and Churchills right now. Almost none in sight. Rubio certainly doesn’t measure up here. Not even close.

    • Mark Swan says

      Mar 14, 2016 at 3:36 am

      Absolutely True Wellington…Yet Even If Those Types Of Men Were Available
      They Just Would Not Be Accepted…Not In This World…You And I May Admire
      Them And Appreciate What They Accomplished And Stood-Up Against…But
      This “I Me” World We Live In Now Has Produced People Who’d Despise Them.

  28. gravenimage says

    Mar 14, 2016 at 12:57 am

    Rubio: “Anywhere in the world you’re going see American men and women serving us in uniform that are Muslims”
    …………………..

    Nidal Malik Hasan–the Ft. Hood Jihadist who murdered thirteen of his fellow soldiers and one unborn baby–was certainly one such example…

  29. Dean says

    Mar 14, 2016 at 3:54 am

    Jeb was also the prior lead man insisting the we need to make nice to keep Islamic countries as allies. The first rule of an alliance is to have something in common to achieve and bring something of value. The alliance is based on common interest, not common values. Muslim countries don’t admit infidels as immigrants. Not a few, none, nada, zero and their leaders know better than these lamebrains that we don’t share anything culturally except human life. We have had no problem in the past forming temporary alliances because we bring overwhelming power and didn’t run and quit unlike the present administration, and that is all that is necessary. I say temporary since ultimately we are the number one enemy and they know it. On that last note we have to think very carefully about furnishing any kind of advanced weaponry and accept the fact that if it is necessary, we need to control it and do it ourselves.

  30. gordon miller says

    Mar 14, 2016 at 8:41 am

    It would be nice if somehow Rubio would read this article. I think he was just trying to show the public that he was a level-headed fellow in contrast to Trump so he could scape up a few votes. Not to worry, he’ll be out of the picture shortly.

  31. Luke says

    Mar 19, 2016 at 3:30 pm

    Wellington: We have another Lincoln. It goes by the name “Obama”. Lincoln, otherwise known as The Great Traitor, has a list of crimes to long to mention. Do some research. I agree that we need a new crop of leaders – but not a new crop of traitors.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • OLD GUY on UK: Woman converts to Islam, distributes Islamic State jihad terror videos
  • OLD GUY on Al-Qaeda Calls on Jihadis to Kill Non-Muslims With Poisoned Coronavirus Masks
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.