Of course, only racist, bigoted “Islamophobes” believe that no-go zones exist. Oh, and maybe the journalists who were punched, kicked, and rammed with a car. Years ago I walked through Molenbeek in Belgium, and was very strongly admonished by a resident there, with an unmistakable hint of menace, not to take any photographs. The same impulse is on display here: the journos were “confronted by a group who objected to them filming.” Islamic supremacists for some reason dislike being photographed or filmed.
“Watch: Journalists Punched, Kicked, And Rammed With Car In Sweden’s ‘Little Mogadishu’ No-Go Zone,” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, March 20, 2016:
An Australian TV station has released a shocking report showing its crew being attacked by masked men in a Stockholm suburb know as ‘Little Mogadishu’ due to it’s primarily Somali population.
Since the report was filmed last month, Swedish police have dropped all charges, despite the migrants throwing missile and punches, fly kicking the journalist, and even running one over with a car.
The Channel Nine crew and high-profile Australian news correspondent, Liz Hayes, had traveled to the Swedish capital to investigate how the migrant “overload” has affected Swedish society.
Upon entering a migrant area, Rinkeby, they were quick to discover some of those effects, and why it is that they have become known as “no-go zones”.
“They were confronted by a group who objected to them filming. There was a series of scuffles and the police were called.
“The 60 Minutes cameraman and producer were slightly injured but filming continued with police at the scene. The crew have now returned to their hotel and are all fine,” a spokesman for the channel told the Local.
A spokesman for Stockholm’s police force, Lars Byström, confirmed that the crew had filed a report, but only about a specific incident.
“We were told there was a film team and there were some youngsters who were in the car and there was some kind of argument between the team and then the driver drove over the cameraman’s foot.”
However, he later said that police had decided to close the case as “very experienced police officers” had made the decision to focus their resources elsewhere.
Several newspapers, such as the Sydney Morning Herald, have attempted to discredit the Channel Nine report by pointing out that the crew was shown around by a man who writes for a website with links to the Sweden Democrats….
Yes, that clearly means that the Muslim migrants behaved impeccably.
William Ash says
There were a couple of moments in the video to make careful note of. The cop who declined to enter the area but choose to wait never went to their aid. Also notice that only when they said they leaving did the trouble start. This last point is a very familiar MO.
Con Ken says
Why is that a mo?
And that group got there just to cause pain, the same kind of group British first gets when they used to interview, one min okay, 30 min later your mobbed.
The Swedish cops r scared, and they won’t give them guns, so can u blame them?
lasslax says
They have guns
Jay Boo says
I suspect that the 60 Minutes journalist provoked them poor Muslims by having fair skin and very blond hair that was uncovered.
Her lack of submission to Muslim sharia and her assumption that she had a right to speak before being spoken to as well as her Nordic racial appearance must have caused them to assume that she was not a Muslim and become filled with anger.
Let us not offend their grievance mongering sensitivities or question their blatant racism.
Adrian says
the dopey journalist in Sweden tries SOOO hard to be tolerant and civilized – to find some justification, anything to praise about the primates who just ran over her cameraman… of course, this is merely the net result of decades of nonjudgmental ‘education’ – suicidal indoctrination in the mult-iculti West
jayell says
The ‘primates’? Are these specimens THAT far up the evolutionary ladder?
JawsV says
I’d say primordial ooze is more like it.
Con Ken says
I think she learned…
Bridget Ames says
Socialism like they desire in Sweden only works when you have a homologous society in which everyone contributes, if you can consider that working. I suppose I mean more subsidiarity society but unfortunately they are all but gone. I do not see how they could even save themselves now.
pdxnag says
Thank you sir. May I have another?
Impeccably Islamic, relative to the evil criminal hated etc etc Kafir?
Sam says
Hope the religion of Islam would not be blamed for few misbehaving “Asian youths” in Sweden.
Europe can not get rid of Islam unless they start deporting all the Muslims in mass to their original country. Can it be done now? I do not think so. Europe is a lost cause.
Con Ken says
It can only be done if a dictatorship like took over Sweden in next election. In fact next election you r going to see many liberals replaced, but like you said, too little too late..as these replacements will not be strong enough for national Sweden to do the tough take out the trash ideology that is needed.
Jay Boo says
Remember that old saying?
Give an ungrateful Muslim a ready to eat meal kit and box full of sandwiches and you feed him for a DAY.
Ah!, but teach him that Muhammad was a buffoon and you feed him for a whole LIFETIME.
ekbano says
Fantastic !
DFD says
Jay Boo says: “…Ah!, but teach him that Muhammad was a buffoon and you feed him for a whole LIFETIME.”
That assumes he can be taught, though, true for some. Love your optimism.
Angemon says
How “progressive” of them…
Lord Wrath says
I almost hate to sat this because of the expected backlash from people that think control can be regained without bloodshed,,, but,,, it seems to me that the best place tp start would be killing the police… There are far less of them than migrants so the task would be more easily accomplished and then it would be a rather simple matter to dispose of the “politicians” responsible for this debacle… I am however making the assumption that there is at least a sizable minority of Swedes that would be willing to fight to take their country back!!!
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
I don’t understand your post Lord. ‘
‘The best place to start would be killing the police’? Who should kill the police, and how would that be ‘the best place to start’? And how are the police ‘responsible’ for the muslim hordes, as are the politicians?
gravenimage says
“Lord Wrath” wrote:
I almost hate to sat (sic) this because of the expected backlash from people that think control can be regained without bloodshed,,, but,,, it seems to me that the best place tp (sic) start would be killing the police… There are far less of them than migrants so the task would be more…
………………..
Sure–we’d all be safer if only we murdered all the people tasked with protecting us. Surely the solution to the police not doing enough for the public is to butcher them all? sarc/off
This is the same sort of creep who lauds–or pretends to laud–someone like Anders Breivik.
Surely “Lord Wrath” hesitated to post his vicious driven because he knew he would be recognized as the nasty agent provocateur he is.
Fatts says
55 no go zones in Schveden? Or as I call them: sharia zones.
Well, if the Europeans ever realize they need to do these people and be done with them, at least the muzzies are, to a large degree, contained in kill boxes.
Ye olde silver lining.
JMB says
Here in Sydney Austria we are fast acquiring no-go zones, they follow a trail from the inner west suburbs of Lakemba and Campsie and spread to Sydney’s outer South west and branch to places such as Guildford and Auburn. What have all these areas got in common, Muslims and more Muslims, crime, street shootings, business signs in Arabic, mosques, Islamic schools and welfare centres, women dressed in black robes, men dressed in outfits resembling pyjamas. The latest outrage in one of these areas was a a street shoot-out with one innocent bystander killed.
Unfortunately we have a media and a central government that can’t quite see the problem. (Or does not want to)
In the meantime the inquest begins into deaths at the recent Sydney cafe siege, again Islamic terror involving the killing inoccent civilians at a city cafe. Repeat, this is in Sydney Australia, not Kabul or Mogadishu.
Dom107 says
I thought the Aussies had this problem sorted.It would appear not.As for the Sydney cafe siege it looked on TV that the police had a clear head shot at this guy before he killed one of the hostages.Why didn’t they take it.Deportation is the answer to serious crime from these people in Australia or anywhere else.What is wrong with host governments all around the world.The Shah of Iran before he was overthrown remarked in an interview in answer to criticism of his tough measures that the West didn’t understand that these people interpret our style of law enforcement as weak and view it with contempt and disrespect.He sure was right it would seem!!??
aussieg says
The sniper had a clear shot of the guy but the building he was in used to be a bank and the sniper would have been shooting through bullet proof glass. Plus, at that stage they thought he had a bomb in his backpack so were acting cautiously. I think they did a fantastic job.
billybob says
They teach you in a life saving course if you have to swim way out to rescue a drowning victim… If that person panics and clings to you in such a way that threatens to drown you both, you have to punch him in the head as hard as you can to stun him so that you can tow him along and both arrive safely ashore.
This situation in Sweden is shocking. You can’t allow these people you rescued to destroy your civilization. Round up all the immigrants and put them in concentration camps. Separate the men and the women so they can’t breed. Take away their Qurans. Give them classes in the Swedish language and culture, and a trade. There will be no compulsion to attend. Those that sincerely apply themselves and graduate get to leave the concentration camp and join Swedish society. Those that don’t simply never leave the concentration camp, unless they request to go back where they came from. In which case, their request will be cheerfully granted. You simply can’t allow these animals to run around loose and wreak havoc on society.
jewdog says
In gratitude, the Islamic State should give Sweden its own version of the Statue of Liberty, as France did to the US, a Statue of Sharia, shrouded in a niqab, inscribed with a poem:
Give us your all-fired-up, your spoor,
Your befuddled masses yearning to live for free,
The violent refuse of your seething Umma,
Send these, the head-hackers, jihad-bound to me.
I douse my lamp, lest I be immodest.
linnte says
Why do the Reporters RUN away? Why not get private security men to accompany them? If they had continued and the violence got worse, it would show the world how SCREWED up this is! Doesn’t anyone have any kahones any more? I am 62 and work security for a yearly venue that draws 100 thousand people in 3 days time, and walking into an angry mob of people doesn’t intimidate me! They are weaklings to run!
sidney penny says
Why can’t 60 minutes report on the Hungarian Prime Minister warning of the deliberate invasion of Europe by “refugees” who will destroy it?
Why are the police scared to be on the streets of an immigrant suburb?
Why can’t 60 minutes hire private security guards?
60 Minutes reporter Liz Hayes has become an apologist for Islam by saying”
“It’s just part and parcel of the difficult refugee scenario, and it’s a shame because I think 99 per cent of people who are fleeing are not necessarily a threat and not necessarily poorly behaved.”
Really Liz? What sort of reporter are you?
Are you just saying this because of violence against you and the crew?
Looks like the west especially Europe will disappear with a whimper.
Australia may learn from Europe’s downfall but not if you accept the reporting Liz Hayes as a 60 minutes reporter .
James Foard says
Oh tooooo bad 60 Minutes. If this could only happen to the local rag of a newspaper in my town. Might just wake them up.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
I wish worse had happened to this idiot woman ‘reporter’. Because she’s 50% of the problem.
The other 50% is the idiot gov’t.
i assign no blame whatsoever to the muslims. Dogs will bark, birds will fly, and muslims will be savages. And nowhere did this idiot woman even utter the word ‘islam’ or ‘muslim’. You morons you.
Jay Boo says
Huh!
You can’t be serious.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
I am perfectly serious. Utterly and completely.
Angry Aussie says
Liz Hayes is not an idiot woman. People like you are what is wrong with the world. Quick to condemn someone for doing a professional job. How about you go out there with the savages and start sprouting about Islam and Muslims and see how long you last. Anyone with half a functioning brain realises Liz Hayes was trying to diffuse the situation. She put her safety at risk. She wasn’t a keyboard warrior.
gravenimage says
Kathy Brown Esq. wrote:
i assign no blame whatsoever to the muslims. Dogs will bark, birds will fly, and muslims will be savages.
………………………
I always love your comments, Kathy, but I can’t agree with you on this point.
Muslims are human beings–as, such, their behavior is not pre-determined. They *decide* to follow their creed and act like savages.
But I very much *do* agree with you that every Infidel should assume that any Infidel dealing with Muslims should assume that they will act like barbarians–and that includes this clueless news crew.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Graven, we’re Americans together. We have 1st Amendment freedom. I love your comments too, including the one you just made! Because our freedom to disagree is at the heart of our Republic.
And unlike the philistines on the left? When we disagree, we don’t abuse, insult, and scream obscenities at each other. By the way, that word ‘philistines’? Guess what ‘Palestine’ has as its etymological base?
You are correct that muslims bear responsibility for their actions. What I meant to convey is, after 15 years of watching the followers of islam post-911, I no longer expect muslims to 1. Stop being savages and 2. Stand up against the savages among them.
It was about my expectation, not their responsibility. I apologize for my incoherence, and thank you for your post.
mortimer says
The Social Democrat ruling party in Sweden has tried to de-nationalize Sweden by a number of measures that destroyed Sweden’s political structure, culture and customs and made it almost impossible to criticize the government or its immigration policies especially. Sweden has been to a large degree, a dictatorship of the Social Democrats, however, the Sweden Democrat party now has the largest support of any party, but that is only around 25% of all voters.
The Social Democrats took a great country and they’re basically trashing it.
Westman says
Geneticists and Psychologists seem quite happy to split the cause of human behavior into genetics and environment. Obviously, the genetic component is fixed and environment can be changed. Somehow governments ignore the environment, while pumping financial assistance, and trying to inject improved education, into bad neighborhoods, worldwide. Then they wonder why there is no improvement.
The 55 no-go areas of Sweden are classic examples of retaining the environment from which the migrants came. The ghettos of the world and the prison systems are not improving for the same reason. If the most obvious success is the drug dealer on the corner and there are no jobs because businesses will not open in crime-infested areas, then there is no hope of changing the environment short of eliminating it.
That leaves the only viable solution to be bringing only people who will work for a peaceful earned future, out of the environment; meaning no longer living with or being under the influence of the old crowd.
For immigration to Europe and the US that would mean a slow, vetted, immigration policy that demands integration as a requirement for opportunity. That ship is sailing too late in Europe; the no-go Islamic islands are already established. Only countries like Hungary, which will only accept socially-integrating immigrants, have a chance for relative unity in the population.
Islam actively resists integration. In democratic countries, Islamic neighborhoods are islands of sedition with Sharia elevated above civil law, a hand out for assistance, and little allegiance to the nation. Un-integrated Islam has nothing of value to contribute to Europe.
scherado says
On what planet is would you believe that the “genetic component is fixed”? Are you a Creationist?
Westman says
Actually, I’m Agnostic, sherado.
Your and my genetic makeup was fixed (as in determined, unchangeable) when we were conceived. Some of our behavior is genetically determined and, of course, there is continual debate about its extent while also general agreement that it is significant. That leaves the environment (parental training, religion, peers, education, social experience, etc) as the changeable influence in human lives. It seems obvious enough that we can consciously modify our behavior regardless of any genetically caused tendency, but also that it unlikely to happen if our social environmental conditions oppose such change.
Islam forms societies in which change is forbidden, compliance is enforced, and integration into infidel society is opposed. The social environment becomes fixed (static). This is the Achilles Heel of Islam.
DFD says
Westman says: “…Geneticists and Psychologists seem quite happy to split the cause of human behavior into genetics and environment…..Islam actively resists integration. … and little allegiance to the nation. Un-integrated Islam has nothing of value to contribute to Europe.”
I agree with your post, but for two points: 1) It shows no allegiance to the host nation at all – never mind little. 2) It has nothing of value to contribute – PERIOD. Not “just” Europe.
Good post.
Further you said: “…..Islam forms societies in which change is forbidden, compliance is enforced, and integration into infidel society is opposed. The social environment becomes fixed (static). This is the Achilles Heel of Islam.”
Exactly, but we must exploit that actively. No arrow into Achilles’ heel means that Achilles will go on.
Whilst I reply to your posts I take the opportunity to reply to scherado as well: What business of yours is Westman’s believe system – and therewith that of anybody else? If he were a creationist, or a mainstream Christian, who are not creationists, or if he were a voodoo priest, an agnostic or not, what business is that of yours?
Thanks for your posts Westman, usually worth reading.
gravenimage says
Good points, Westman.
Champ says
scherado asks:
“Are you a Creationist?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So …what if he is?
Mark Swan says
Good Question Champ
Pere LaChaise says
More than 400 years ago, Spain ejected her last recalcitrant Moslem. Spanish reconquistadores did not immediately throw out the rabble when they regained the country in 1492, but made every effort to assimilate the moor hordes that had lived 700 years on Spanish soil. But they found out that no matter how accommodating they were to the aliens, they would not be reconformed to Spanish Catholic norms – their moorish ways were homeostatic.
So after a long attempt at accommodation of the Moslem minority, punctuated by violent uprisings of moslems against the new majority of Christians, the Spanish crown lost its patience, changed its policies and threw them out by force. And Spain has never suffered the indignity of Moslem shariah zones since.
I hope Europeans become intolerant of festering wounds in their social fabric that are Moslem ghettoes in their cities, and clean them up by any means necessary. They shouldn’t kid themselves that tolerance of the intolerable is an expression of humanity. It is mere cowardice. Time for a new European who is not afraid of bruises and knows history is on his side – if he remembers his history.
gravenimage says
Pere LaChaise wrote:
…And Spain has never suffered the indignity of Moslem shariah zones since.
……………………….
Not until recently, at least:
“No Go Zone: No Female Cops Allowed Near Spanish Mosque”
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/142752/no-go-zone-no-female-cops-allowed-near-spanish-daniel-greenfield
And
“Spanish Town Becoming ‘New Mecca of the Most Radical Islamism'”
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2394/salt-spain-radical-islamism
And Bare Naked Islam ran this story about the same town:
“SPAIN: Women are terrified to go out of their houses after 8PM because they fear Muslims will rape them”
There’s much more.
Vivarto says
very simple solution
Demand that all migrants have to choose between Islam and staying is Sweden.
If they want Islam, very well, go back to Somalaria or some other shithole.
If you want to be part of Sweden (or any other civilized country) then drop Islam and learn civilized norms.
sahani says
when our leaders let local convert to islam or let islam land in your country .your country is now on the path of destruction. islam teaches all it followers love saudi god and saudi book. no local convert is your citizen but now soldier of islam. death and destruction is your future now . our leaders destroying your and his nations .
jewdog says
We get the usual Marxist explanations here: poverty, marginalization, unemployment etc. I’m surprised they didn’t mention global warming.
Mo says
They wanted Islam. Now they have it. Enjoy!
5:50 “There’s no need to hurt us. There’s no need to be unkind.”
Hilarious! I had to stop watching after that. Liberals like this female reporter really do think telling people to just “be nice to each other” works with violent people like these.
Mirren10 says
I noted that as well, Mo. Stupid twit.
Mo says
@ Mirren10
“I noted that as well, Mo. Stupid twit.”
While I do not condone the actions of these violent Muslims, and while I do not wish injury on fools like these reporters, I think a little “up close and personal” experience and even a bit of harmless shoving around serves them right. Maybe it will wake them up to reality as it is, rather than what they wish it to be!
Then again, Lara Logan was brutally attacked, raped, and nearly killed by savage Muslims. And as far as I’ve seen, she’s not speaking out either. Some of these liberals are so deluded that even permanent injury and even coming close to death STILL does not make any change in their view on this death cult.
What can you do? You can’t fix stupid.
gravenimage says
And don’t forget the witless Jens Orback, former Swedish government minister, who said, “We must be open and tolerant toward Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so toward us”.
What a suicidal idiot…
gravenimage says
Video: Muslim migrants punch, kick, ram journalists with car in Sweden’s “Little Mogadishu” no-go zone
……………………….
Sure as hell sounds like a No Go Zone to me…
More:
Since the report was filmed last month, Swedish police have dropped all charges, despite the migrants throwing missile and punches, fly kicking the journalist, and even running one over with a car.
……………………….
What does it take?
More:
However, he later said that police had decided to close the case as “very experienced police officers” had made the decision to focus their resources elsewhere.
……………………….
Yeah–probably somewhere a lot safer…
More:
Several newspapers, such as the Sydney Morning Herald, have attempted to discredit the Channel Nine report by pointing out that the crew was shown around by a man who writes for a website with links to the Sweden Democrats….
……………………….
Uh huh. Do these dhimmi Aussies want to pretend that these mobbings and assaults as a result somehow didn’t happen?
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Angry: I stand by my comment on idiot woman Hayes.
I’ve watched some of her ‘journalism’. The words islam’, ‘muslim’, ‘islamic jihad’, never pass her lips. She whitewashes these violent murderers. ‘As the [Swedish] welcome wears out, migrant anger bursts forth’-this is how Hayes describes the ‘plight’ of the ‘desperate migrants’ from the world’s trouble-spots’. She fails to mention that the ‘trouble spots’ are created by those selfsame ‘migrants’, and that the ‘migrants’ causing the trouble, are all MUSLIM.
As for me Sir: I am a 1st Amendment attorney at law who regularly confronts the MSA in our colleges. I and my colleagues do that because we defend our 1st Amendment and they are the greatest offenders. For our pains we are routinely: Abused, threatened, and excoriated. And when we go to some of our campuses Sir? We routinely require security accompaniment.
So you’re certainly entitled to your opinion. But not to your own facts.
Finally: Hayes’ idiotic intro into her ‘Sweden’ piece? ‘I could never have imagined what would happen to us, in a country as wonderful as Sweden’. Seriously? Was she living under a rock previous to her ‘Swedish assignment’? Sweden’s been the rape capitol of the WORLD, Sir, for nearly 2 years. Hayes is only ‘surprised’ because that’s how she PC’s her [non] investigative journalistic piece, on islamic violence and intolerance.
linnte says
Glad you’re on my side! And proud too!
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Back atcha Linnte. Love your posts.
Mo says
@ Kathy Brown
“As for me Sir: I am a 1st Amendment attorney at law who regularly confronts the MSA in our colleges. I and my colleagues do that because we defend our 1st Amendment and they are the greatest offenders. For our pains we are routinely: Abused, threatened, and excoriated. And when we go to some of our campuses Sir? We routinely require security accompaniment.”
Thank you for being out there in the midst of the battle! (And I second Linnte – glad you are on our side.)
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
We are all ‘in the midst of the battle’ Mo. And all our SIOA members are on the right side.
Funny postscript: I’m helping to direct a play at our local Catholic school, and we were recently looking for the right venue for our performances. The Director of the play suggested that we try Washburn University, to see about their theatre space…
When she suggested that, I cracked up and said: ‘Dear Lord Carol! If you want to go there to look, you’d better go w/o me. I’m persona non grata on that campus-the MSA has BANNED me!’.
We found a different theatre space. God always provides!
Mo says
@ Kathy Brown, Esq.
“When she suggested that, I cracked up and said: ‘Dear Lord Carol! If you want to go there to look, you’d better go w/o me. I’m persona non grata on that campus-the MSA has BANNED me!’.
We found a different theatre space. God always provides!”
You know you’re doing the right thing when you’re angering the right people. Excellent!
And yes, He does provide! I’m glad it all worked out for you and your group.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Mo: Your comment is much appreciated. It put me in mind of something our warriors say, and I hope I’ve got this right: ‘When you’re getting a lot of flack, you know you’re hitting the target.’
Now I can’t even imagine how these men have the bravery TO suit up and take it to the savages. But then that’s another part of God’s providence: He made men as he did (hint: testosterone) exactly because He knew we’d have [righteous] wars. And He gives them the strength to fight them.
Those of us serving on the home-front, well, we do what we can. But none of it compares to the willingness to take up arms and KILL these savages, so we can sleep safely in our beds at night.
All presently serving and our vets on this site: You have my-and millions and millions of our fellow Americans-undying gratitude. God bless and reward you all.
ABDELKADER HAMDAOUI says
“Knowledge of history and possession of information are vital to be successful in the business of war. The ‘Saracens’ were dishing out Islamic crusades of terror and beheading from time immemorial. What’s is happening today is nothing new, it is history never studied in schools in its continuity and totality, history that may be an affront to established historical opinion. Islam’s major weapon of mass deception is “deceit”. Weapons of secrecy and falsehood operating under an ideology of hate. The Islamic horde were almost at the gates of Paris and had it NOT been for Charles Martel (grandfather of Charlemagne) who defeated them at the Battle of Tours in 732 they would have crossed the English Channel onto Britain and America,the United States thereof, would NOT be here today. In Eastern Europe the Islamic crusade (jihad) in their victory at Kosovo Polje 1389 and Hungary 1526 slaughtered their way in their advance through towards Vienna which twice in 1529 and 1683 not only withstood the siege but finally defeated the Islamic Turks (Ottoman Turks as they were known). North East in Russia Grigory Potemkin, husband of Catherine the Great, finally defeated the Eastern Islamic Crusades in 1774. They have not stopped and have been upfront in saying they will not stop. Their crusades (jihad) will go on until we are all converted to Islamism and accept that there’s no God but Allah. We, on the other hand, seemed to be conspiring in our own undoing.”