THIS 5 MINUTE VIDEO STARTS WITH REMARKS FROM ISRAEL’S NETANYAHU — SUPERB STATEMENT.
THEN ROBERT COMES IN TO TALK ABOUT HOW THE TIMETABLE OF JIHAD IN EUROPE HAS BEEN PUT INTO FAST FORWARD BY THE WORRY THAT SALAH ABDESLAM WILL BREAK UNDER INTERROGATION.
AND IMPLICATIONS FOR “LONE WOLVES” ALSO STARTING RAPIDLY HERE IN AMERICA.
Please — send a path for viewing this video to your federal and state elected officials. They might not understand yet how jihad could be deepened and speeded by Abdeslam revealing what he knows regarding Europe AND the United States.
Jerrysays
Mr. Spencer made a vital point here in regard to vetting. People who have murder on their mind will have little compunction to “blend in.” If looking less islamic will aid their plan of murder and mayhem then we have to assume they will do it. These jihad attacks are not a result of some spontaneous impulse to kill. They are well-planned and organized in their effort and looking less conspicuous would certainly be a tactic they would employ.
It seems best for me to assume that anyone who identifies with the islamic faith is a security risk. That would include the millions of muslims we have already in our nation, especially those who are actively involved with some mosque. The mosque is where they strengthen their cultural ties and teach their religion, the driving force of which is the destruction of all other faiths and freedoms in service to their god, allah. You don’t have to believe me, their holy books declare it. It may often be that jihad is more implicitly promoted than explicitly, but jihad is ever-present in islam as the ultimate act of faith in their religion. Jihad is what the civilized world is at war with, thousands are dying and suffering untold misery because of it.
So we must first consider their political religion and its mosques as the linchpin elements in their campaign against us. Then we must take every precaution and measure to prevent its dissemination and influence. I think that’s a fair response to islam’s genocidal murder of innocents, don’t you? Not that we should feel any need to be “fair.”
jihad3trackersays
Hello Jerry — Thank you for an excellent post with essential FACTS — hard real unpleasant facts — about the essence of Islam’s supremacism. Driven, of course, by Muhammad’s production of a plan to subjugate the entire planet — which he brilliantly understood MUST BE DISGUISED AS THE COMMANDS OF “GOD”.
This video by another courageous and constant counter-jihadist, David Wood, has been recommended by me many times here on Jihad Watch, but now is an appropriate occasion again: “The Jihad Triangle”.
Running only 4:57, containing citations and David’s typical dark humor, it explains how nice Muslims transition into perpetrators of slaughter, shown by recruiters that violence against non-believers is, as you write above, “the ultimate act of faith in their religion”.
Please send a convenient complete internet URL address of that video on in an email to every federal and state official which you readers of this post consider to be halfway intelligent but still clueless. We have to be as tireless in spreading the truth as Robert demonstrates he is.
Angemonsays
Mr. Spencer is right: these people can’t be vetted. Not unless the American government has mind-readers handling the vetting process. And even then, what assurance would they have that they wouldn’t become “radicalized” (i.e., more devout and observant of the principles and obligations of their faith, and of their duty as muslims) in the future?
salimsays
May I share with you a nightmare scenario I occasionally think of: If Islamic terrorism continues and escalates (which I think will happen) to a level that the West wakes up (which I think will never happen). If the Western countries, faced with increased terrorism, are forced to apply common sense and round up all Muslims (radical, moderate and of all sects) and punish them or kick them out. What would happen to me and my children? I am an ex Muslim who spent long years alarming the West against Islam, but I do it using a pen name. In my real life, I still count as a Muslim. It would be difficult for people like me to escape persecution. This is an ugly way for the West to wake up. Also it would be unfair as I spent more time and effort to enlighten people about Islam and rescue our civilisation than many ethnic westerners.
A better and easier way to wake up would be to introduce new legislations that makes practicing true Islam very difficult. (ban halal food, islamic schools, hijab, introduce some restrictions on mosques, ban gender segregation, force Muslims to handle alcohol and pork in shops, Muslims must learn about Christianity in schools ..etc). Keep an eye on Muslims’ practices in society and work place, which would help tell who are the true Muslims.
This whole Islamic problem would have been avoided by introducing simple legislation back in the 1980s. The spread of Islam could have been dealt with easily if the West supported the secular forces against the Islamic forces (such as Saudi Arabia, general Zia of Pakistan, mujaeidoon ).
What could have been done easily by introducing a few logical legislations might not be possible even after rivers of blood.
How sad!
Karensays
Salim, that is an interesting thought experiment, which hopefully will never come to pass. Let’s hope we will always be a nation of (non-Sharia) laws, and committed to justice for all.
I’m not sure I would ban symbols such as the hijab since I think that just triggers the opposition reflex. Plus, the idea of ‘do unto others’ just makes that one impossible, as much as I despise the hijab. But the rest of it – yes, out it goes along with anything Sharia-oriented. Keep the religion, let the mosque apply any rules it sees fit to govern itself internally, so long as they don’t conflict with American law. But, in the public square – no Sharia! That should be a given in American life, and acceptable to one and all, and *should* comprise acceptable legislation.
Karensays
So refreshing, and comforting, to hear Mr. Netanyahu speak, and call things as they are. “Moral clarity”….what a concept! I can hardly imagine Pres. Obama uttering such simple and compelling words. Instead, he would equivocate, tell us to “get off our high horse”, and draw moral equivalency between all the parties, until we’re convinced we are to blame for the attacks on our nations. Contrast the man who is grounded in something real, with the one whose relativistic viewpoint has left him unsure and confused.
IS plan to provoke the Final Battle. This will get very ugly with no will to stop them (or more importantly deal with the underpinning ideology) until it all gets way too ugly.
Thank you very much again Robert.
Dacriticsays
Sorry Benjamin, to defeat “terror” as you call it requires more than joining together in political unity. To defeat “terror” (which is just devout true Muslims trying to carry out Allah’s commands to create the Darul Salam), we need to join together in whatever way necessary to defeat ISLAM!!!
It’s ISLAM!!!
ISLAM! ISLAM! ISLAM!
See Bob Spencer gets it, but you still don’t Mr PM.
CYNTHIAsays
I LOVE NETANYAHU WITH ALL MY HEART. I RESPECT HIM AS A LEADER AND WOULD NOT BE AT ALL SURPRISED IF HE ACTUALLY HELPS THE US. HE IS A WISE MAN. MAY GOD PROTECT HIM AND GIVE HIM WISDOM….WHICH I BELIEVE HE HAS BLESSED HIM ALREADY. HE IS STRAIGHTFORWARD AND ALSO COMPASSIONATE. HE LOVES HIS ISRAEL! HE IS PLACED HERE IN THIS LAND FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS. NEVER UNDERESTIMATE ONE WHO IS CALLED TO LEAD ISRAEL. HE HAS A GREAT BACKING IN HIGH HIGH PLACES. GOD BLESS ISRAEL.
jihad3tracker says
THIS 5 MINUTE VIDEO STARTS WITH REMARKS FROM ISRAEL’S NETANYAHU — SUPERB STATEMENT.
THEN ROBERT COMES IN TO TALK ABOUT HOW THE TIMETABLE OF JIHAD IN EUROPE HAS BEEN PUT INTO FAST FORWARD BY THE WORRY THAT SALAH ABDESLAM WILL BREAK UNDER INTERROGATION.
AND IMPLICATIONS FOR “LONE WOLVES” ALSO STARTING RAPIDLY HERE IN AMERICA.
Please — send a path for viewing this video to your federal and state elected officials. They might not understand yet how jihad could be deepened and speeded by Abdeslam revealing what he knows regarding Europe AND the United States.
Jerry says
Mr. Spencer made a vital point here in regard to vetting. People who have murder on their mind will have little compunction to “blend in.” If looking less islamic will aid their plan of murder and mayhem then we have to assume they will do it. These jihad attacks are not a result of some spontaneous impulse to kill. They are well-planned and organized in their effort and looking less conspicuous would certainly be a tactic they would employ.
It seems best for me to assume that anyone who identifies with the islamic faith is a security risk. That would include the millions of muslims we have already in our nation, especially those who are actively involved with some mosque. The mosque is where they strengthen their cultural ties and teach their religion, the driving force of which is the destruction of all other faiths and freedoms in service to their god, allah. You don’t have to believe me, their holy books declare it. It may often be that jihad is more implicitly promoted than explicitly, but jihad is ever-present in islam as the ultimate act of faith in their religion. Jihad is what the civilized world is at war with, thousands are dying and suffering untold misery because of it.
So we must first consider their political religion and its mosques as the linchpin elements in their campaign against us. Then we must take every precaution and measure to prevent its dissemination and influence. I think that’s a fair response to islam’s genocidal murder of innocents, don’t you? Not that we should feel any need to be “fair.”
jihad3tracker says
Hello Jerry — Thank you for an excellent post with essential FACTS — hard real unpleasant facts — about the essence of Islam’s supremacism. Driven, of course, by Muhammad’s production of a plan to subjugate the entire planet — which he brilliantly understood MUST BE DISGUISED AS THE COMMANDS OF “GOD”.
This video by another courageous and constant counter-jihadist, David Wood, has been recommended by me many times here on Jihad Watch, but now is an appropriate occasion again: “The Jihad Triangle”.
Running only 4:57, containing citations and David’s typical dark humor, it explains how nice Muslims transition into perpetrators of slaughter, shown by recruiters that violence against non-believers is, as you write above, “the ultimate act of faith in their religion”.
Please send a convenient complete internet URL address of that video on in an email to every federal and state official which you readers of this post consider to be halfway intelligent but still clueless. We have to be as tireless in spreading the truth as Robert demonstrates he is.
Angemon says
Mr. Spencer is right: these people can’t be vetted. Not unless the American government has mind-readers handling the vetting process. And even then, what assurance would they have that they wouldn’t become “radicalized” (i.e., more devout and observant of the principles and obligations of their faith, and of their duty as muslims) in the future?
salim says
May I share with you a nightmare scenario I occasionally think of: If Islamic terrorism continues and escalates (which I think will happen) to a level that the West wakes up (which I think will never happen). If the Western countries, faced with increased terrorism, are forced to apply common sense and round up all Muslims (radical, moderate and of all sects) and punish them or kick them out. What would happen to me and my children? I am an ex Muslim who spent long years alarming the West against Islam, but I do it using a pen name. In my real life, I still count as a Muslim. It would be difficult for people like me to escape persecution. This is an ugly way for the West to wake up. Also it would be unfair as I spent more time and effort to enlighten people about Islam and rescue our civilisation than many ethnic westerners.
A better and easier way to wake up would be to introduce new legislations that makes practicing true Islam very difficult. (ban halal food, islamic schools, hijab, introduce some restrictions on mosques, ban gender segregation, force Muslims to handle alcohol and pork in shops, Muslims must learn about Christianity in schools ..etc). Keep an eye on Muslims’ practices in society and work place, which would help tell who are the true Muslims.
This whole Islamic problem would have been avoided by introducing simple legislation back in the 1980s. The spread of Islam could have been dealt with easily if the West supported the secular forces against the Islamic forces (such as Saudi Arabia, general Zia of Pakistan, mujaeidoon ).
What could have been done easily by introducing a few logical legislations might not be possible even after rivers of blood.
How sad!
Karen says
Salim, that is an interesting thought experiment, which hopefully will never come to pass. Let’s hope we will always be a nation of (non-Sharia) laws, and committed to justice for all.
I’m not sure I would ban symbols such as the hijab since I think that just triggers the opposition reflex. Plus, the idea of ‘do unto others’ just makes that one impossible, as much as I despise the hijab. But the rest of it – yes, out it goes along with anything Sharia-oriented. Keep the religion, let the mosque apply any rules it sees fit to govern itself internally, so long as they don’t conflict with American law. But, in the public square – no Sharia! That should be a given in American life, and acceptable to one and all, and *should* comprise acceptable legislation.
Karen says
So refreshing, and comforting, to hear Mr. Netanyahu speak, and call things as they are. “Moral clarity”….what a concept! I can hardly imagine Pres. Obama uttering such simple and compelling words. Instead, he would equivocate, tell us to “get off our high horse”, and draw moral equivalency between all the parties, until we’re convinced we are to blame for the attacks on our nations. Contrast the man who is grounded in something real, with the one whose relativistic viewpoint has left him unsure and confused.
Graeme Howarth says
IS plan to provoke the Final Battle. This will get very ugly with no will to stop them (or more importantly deal with the underpinning ideology) until it all gets way too ugly.
Thank you very much again Robert.
Dacritic says
Sorry Benjamin, to defeat “terror” as you call it requires more than joining together in political unity. To defeat “terror” (which is just devout true Muslims trying to carry out Allah’s commands to create the Darul Salam), we need to join together in whatever way necessary to defeat ISLAM!!!
It’s ISLAM!!!
ISLAM! ISLAM! ISLAM!
See Bob Spencer gets it, but you still don’t Mr PM.
CYNTHIA says
I LOVE NETANYAHU WITH ALL MY HEART. I RESPECT HIM AS A LEADER AND WOULD NOT BE AT ALL SURPRISED IF HE ACTUALLY HELPS THE US. HE IS A WISE MAN. MAY GOD PROTECT HIM AND GIVE HIM WISDOM….WHICH I BELIEVE HE HAS BLESSED HIM ALREADY. HE IS STRAIGHTFORWARD AND ALSO COMPASSIONATE. HE LOVES HIS ISRAEL! HE IS PLACED HERE IN THIS LAND FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS. NEVER UNDERESTIMATE ONE WHO IS CALLED TO LEAD ISRAEL. HE HAS A GREAT BACKING IN HIGH HIGH PLACES. GOD BLESS ISRAEL.