“A lot of people want to stereotype and say that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair, or something like that,” said the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Student Association’s Ahad Arshad. Why, how could anyone get the idea that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair? It’s inconceivable!
I do wonder, however, when Boston College, that fine Catholic school, will be holding a commemoration in honor of Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it. When will Boston College be celebrating the memory of Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? And of the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and of Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and of Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and of the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and of the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and of the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and of the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and of the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and of the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and of the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and of the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?
When is their day? When will anyone stand in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?
“Women Try On Hijabs at Catholic Boston College Islamic Awareness Week Event,” by Susan Berry, Breitbart, March 18, 2016:
The first Islamic Awareness Week at Boston College featured an event in which women were invited to wear the Muslim hijab and learn more about the lives of Muslim women.
The “Hijab Booth” has been a popular event worldwide used to encourage Western empathy for Muslim women.
“A lot of people want to stereotype and say that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair, or something like that,” Muslim Student Association (MSA) president Ahad Arshad said, according to The Heights, the newspaper of the Catholic Jesuit school and its surrounding community. “But obviously there are women who do it in their own free will, and it’s better if people can just see that.”
Arshad said the hijab event helps non-Muslims understand why Muslim women choose to wear the head garment.
“It eliminates that fear factor, like that ‘Oh this is so foreign to me, I’ve never seen that before,’” he said. “If you see it on campus, you know girls wearing hijabs and talking openly about it and how they’ve made that choice on their own, independently, it definitely makes it less alien.”
However, a recent Muslim educational video – “Salma and the Hijab” – featured a young Muslim girl who is taught by her mother that to choose not to wear the hijab – or to wear Western style clothing – would bring her “closer to Satan.”
Salma’s mother says in the animated video produced by Qatar’s government-owned Islamweb.net:
The hijab, my daughter, is a natural thing for the Muslim woman. The Prophet Muhammad ordered us to wear it, so anyone who abides by this is being obedient to Allah and His Prophet, and she gets many rewards. As for someone who does not wear the hijab, revealing parts of her body, like her hair, her arms, her neck or her legs – she is closer to Satan and denying Allah, the All Merciful. A Muslim woman must wear the hijab, and must not wear just any item of clothing she sees in the market. Islamic clothes have special requisites.
In December, Muslim women Asra Q. Nomani and Hala Arafa denounced these “hijab booth” events in which they claim Americans are getting “duped” by a Muslim sexist agenda. They say they would rather see Americans stand against the ideology of Islamism that represses women and demands Muslim women cover themselves.
Nomani and Arafa explain that while both were born into conservative families that had no edict for women to cover their hair, following the Iranian revolution of the minority Shia sect in 1979 and the rise of the “well-funded” Saudis from the majority Sunni sect, they “experienced bullying to cover [their] hair from men and boys.”
“This ideology promotes a social attitude that absolves men of sexually harassing women and puts the onus on the victim to protect herself by covering up,” the women write. “The Muslim Reform Movement, however, supports the right of Muslim women to have the option of wearing the hijab or not.”
“As Americans, we believe in freedom of religion,” the women state, adding:
But we need to clarify to those in universities, the media and discussion forums that in exploring the “hijab,” they are not exploring Islam, but rather the ideology of political Islam as practiced by the mullahs, or clerics, of Iran and Saudi Arabia, the Taliban in Afghanistan and the Islamic State.
Though Arshad says he himself has not experienced any “ignorance or hatred” at Boston College (BC), other colleges’ MSAs have been holding these types of awareness events.
“I have never really faced any stereotyping or ignorance or hatred, at least not to my face,” admits Arshad. “I can’t think of anyone who has done or said anything Islamophobic.”
The MSA president said the goal of Islamic Awareness Week is to present Islam as a “religion of peace.”
“Given that this is a Catholic university, and most students are Catholic, what better topic for Muslims to engage students with than someone as revered as Jesus?” he said.
The MSA at BC was reportedly launched six years ago as a means to educate people about Islam and gather together the Muslims on the campus.
The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) observes that the MSA of the United States and Canada was incorporated in January 1963, when members of the Muslim Brotherhood came together at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign with the goal of “spreading Islam as students in North America.”
“Islamic extremism is on the rise on college and university campuses across the United States,” IPT states. “The spread of radical Islamism on campuses has proven to be an effective tool to garner support and gain legitimacy, exploiting the right of free association with academic institutions.”
IPT maintains that the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced MSA often uses college and university campuses as a means to gain support through campaigns based on diversity and tolerance.
“International and domestic groups that advocate extremist or radical causes frequently host lectures and other events on campuses to shore up support and recruit members,” IPT states. “Indeed, universities are a fertile field for radicals searching for the next generation of activists and sympathizers.”…

11B40 says
Greetings:
“Does this suicide belt make my ass look fat ???”
DogOnPorch says
Ha! Good one.
Keith says
Yes but it is ok because when it goes bang you will definatley get an instant weight loss
Shane says
Why do they ignore the burqha, that hideous trash bag some Muslim women are forced to wear. No women in her right mind would wear something that ugly. When it is 120 degrees in the sun a woman wearing a black trash bag on her body must be suffering.
davej says
Sure, wear a hajib so you can feel solidarity with Islam and thus actually “closer to Satan”.
It’s a novelty and knee jerk liberal reaction done without any easily done inquiry into the real situation women are in under the exclusively male and incredibly cruel Islamic hierarchy.
mortimer says
Islamic Stockholm syndrome
revereridesagain says
And then there’s Harvard, where students likely to “feel solidarity with Islam” have a more generalized and universal approach to the problem:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/337183/
mortimer says
revereridesagain wrote: “Harvard, where students likely to “feel solidarity with Islam”
They deny what the evils are actually CONDONING and WHITEWASHING:
1 No Golden Rule 2 No free speech 3 No democracy 4 Jihad – holy war of supremacism 5 Honour killings 6 Taqiyya – sacred lying 7 Taqlid – group think 8 Misogyny – repression of women 9 Rape of kafirs as jihad prizes 10 Genocide 11 Ethnic cleansing 12 Al-Walaa wal-Baraa – Islamic apartheid 13 Torture 14 Plundering 15 Cruel and unusual punishments 16 Backwardness – stagnation 17 Violence against women 18 Slavery 19 Discriminatory Sharia law 20 Hatred of the arts 21 Pedophilia disguised as child marriage 22 Fifty generations of cousin marriage and genetic defects 23 Cruelty to animals 24 Extortion tax to humiliate disbelievers 25 No historic basis 26 Anti-intellectual obscurantism 27 FGM 28 Arab racism 29 Theocratic totalitarianism 30 Vigilantism
Andre says
Obviously, islam is an evil cult !
Dan says
Lol, oh yea like this is what is like really living under the rule of those who follow the pedophile…
More End Time News At:
http://www.shininginthedark.com/?page_id=6088
Stu says
Go to Iran or Saudi see how you get on if you don’t wear one, That is why we say it is oppressive.
And why we just feel sorrow for you. Iran was a nice place once with a normal attitude to things.Foolish brainwashed people.
JawsV says
Just think – all that tuition they’re paying to attend Boston College so they can be idiots.
Donovan Nuera says
That’s what happens when the current Pope proclaims platitudes about the “Abrahamic monotheistic bonds of these 3 great religions”…rather than proclaiming Mo’ as a false prophet and allah as a non-related family idol from a Yemeni tribe of old.
Jay Boo says
NUMBER 9
WE need to remind them over and over about the hate speech in Islamic prayers and about what Muslims are really taught about Christians and Jews in their Quran.
Beginning with Qur’an chapter 9 ____ :29
Pere LaChaise says
This brings us back to the horribly misplaced emphasis the Melkite Catholic priest Louis Massignon placed on ‘sacred hospitality’ not to even try to reach Moslems with the Gospel of Christ, instead ‘atoning for moslems’ errors at the table of sacrifice’. Massignon was the one who invented this horrid meme, “Three Abrahamic Faiths” that opened the door among Catholics to apostasy.
A Catholic school sponsoring an event essentially softening up Catholic students to conversion to the pernicious death cult demonstrates how stupid Catholic leaders have become. It wasn’t very long ago when they were excoriating Orthodox Christians as ‘heretics’ but now they open their hearts to ‘Abrahamic brethren’ whose teaching abrogates every basis of Christian faith and has shown itself plainly to set its polemic at the throat of Catholic teaching and community. Not to mention the genocide of Christians coterminous with Moslem conquest.
Massignon was a fool, but he wasn’t stupid or ignorant. He knew Islam to be a pack of lies but his own personal traumas in the desert led him to a fixation on Moslem charisma, akin to T. E. Lawrence’s fetish for them, that warped his critical faculty. Moslem teaching distorts every Old Testament story into satanic lies ‘proving’ to wretched Arabs that they, not their hated Jewish neighbors, are the ‘chosen, superior people’ for whom their god has destined a place of world domination.
We can thank the regents of Boston College for helping the ‘best of people’ to gain one more foothold among formerly Catholic students under their tutelage. A special place in gehinnom awaits.
boakai ngombu says
“… Moslem teaching distorts every Old Testament story into satanic lies ‘proving’ to wretched Arabs that they, not their hated Jewish neighbors, are the ‘chosen, superior people’ for whom their god has destined a place of world domination….”
thought that needed to be said again, P La Chaise
the allah god of islam (unknowable; the best of all deceivers) through Muhammad (lately contrived; full of lusts) needs to be more offended and all its slaves need to grovel for they are neither superior nor heirs to the Promise YHWH has given as long as they remain bound by the SHARIA. that needs to be said.
Sandra Lee Smithn says
Exactly; and when so many of the Protestant leaderships go along with him in that teaching!
Angemon says
Sly choice of words – some people think that islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair, but some cover their hair out of their own free will, therefore there’s no problem whatsoever, you bigoted islamophobe.
Did Nomani and Arafa explained the difference between this “ Islamism that represses women and demands Muslim women cover themselves” and regular islam?
Sssshhhh!!! Don’t let CAIR hear you say that or you’ll be branded an “islamophobe” – don’t you know the official narrative states that a plague of islamophobia is running rampant and unchecked in the US?
Nomis says
“Arshad said the hijab event helps non-Muslims understand why Muslim women choose to wear the head garment.”
Muslim women “choose” to wear the hijab for one of two reasons:
1. They buy into the crap they’re told from the second they’re born and end up pissing away the one and only existence they’re going to get on the promise of eternal paradise, which is nothing more than a myth. When you’re dead, you’re dead.
2. They are so frightened of what might happen to them if the don’t wear the hijab, from being disowned to being beaten or even murdered, by their own family of course.
It’s always struck me that religion is a complete waste of time and energy. With most religions you might waste a few hours a week and harm no-one but yourself, but with Islam you waste your entire life and the lives of all who are close to you. I can see nothing good in it.
Perhaps for Islamic Awareness Week they should have provided suicide vests for the men to try on, and maybe set a few off to really get that Islam vibe.
LR says
How about: “Women in the Islamic World”, awareness week. (Current history).
I’m sure we could show how ‘liberated’, and ‘uplifted’ many women have become while growing up in some of the, ‘dominated by Islam’ countries.
How are they doing with education, stonings, apostacy, honor killings, FGM and child marriage?
More and more women are getting to be suicide bombers now, I suppose that could be considered ‘progress’ for them.
I guess Arshad didn’t want to educate the ‘Western-minded’ women about what their groups sentiments are really about.
Here is one of those nice MSA girls wearing a hijab…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7yGN8SlIEZ8
Ted Tyler says
The video is extremely telling and actually defines the problem. There are Muslim Students Associations in too many of our colleges and universities. Their purpose is to advance Islam by suppressing any criticism of Islam and enforcing political correctness. Any criticism of the MSM would be viewed as a hate crime. They are now deeply entrenched in our society and are shaping the minds of our kids. Are there any student associations whose mission is to tell the truth about the true mission of Islam? If there were, would these students be barred from the universities due to “Hate Thought”? How about the OSH? (Ottoman Historical Society) As you can see I am really grasping at straws here.
Ted Tyler says
Nomis, as an Atheist, I must disagree with your thought that “….religion is a waste of time”. For me, going to church was a fun time. I was a choir boy and loved the music. You could go there and meditate and experience a sort of peace. Listening to the sermons was very entertaining. Sometimes they would have some really good ideas – and then sometimes not. At home we would listen to Bishop Fulton J. Sheen – who was both entertaining and eloquent.
As I see it, belief in the supernatural – be it Christianity, Islam, or whatever – have essentially the same mechanisms operating – a series of memes that are incorporated into the religion so that you must defend that religion to the death. Any attack on your religion becomes an attack on you and therefore the attacker must be destroyed. Criticism of Christianity in the time of Galileo was a very dangerous thing to do. And if you wanted to translate the Bible into the common language – well you just might be burned alive! (surly, tell me that that did not happen) Today, Christians no longer hang witches, press to death unbelievers, or have a good old fashioned stoning.
With Islam, things are a bit different. instead of engaging in religious meditation one day a week, the Muslim must do this continuously – seven days a week – 5 times a day. This continual prayer eventually destroys your mind and explains why the Muslim contribution to scientific advancements in the present day is essentially zero.
My view is that religion about 10% of the time is a very good thing. You can take a break from reality and enter a fantasy world where you can relax a bit before returning to the “real” world. Religion 100% of the time is a very bad thing and produces brain rot.
Sandra Lee Smithn says
Well, you got it partly right; the whole hajib thing is never going to get anyone anywhere; but there is life after this world and its death; and you will learn that, probably sooner than you’d believe. However; an hajib will not get anyone into paradise, since it’s part of a system following a lying deity who isn’t even a god (lower case intentional) but a FALLEN former archangel who rebelled against his Creator, like much of humanity, including you, have done/are doing; and all who follow him, whether via Islam or any of the myriad other false belief systems including “atheism” (fact is there is no such critter as an atheist; humans are hardwired to worship something or someone, whether they acknowledge that to themselves or not), the end result of such beliefs will be the same; a NOT very pleasant place in which to spend eternity and all will be there who continue in rebellion against the Creator of all!
Myxlplik says
If these Quranimals cared one bit about descrimination and Catholics they’d go to Yemin, but with a Habit booth for Muslims to try on.
Go to where there is a problem hypocrites.
Donovan Nuera says
I wonder if the School President said a Mass for the 4 new martyrs who were chased down, tied up, shot in their heads, and then, for one final humiliation, had their shattered skulls crushed with butts of their moslem killers’ assault rifles? The 4 nuns were from India and Africa and their convent and chapel were the only vestiges left in that town.
gravenimage says
That’s this horrifying story:
“4 nuns, 12 others killed in ‘diabolical’ attack on home for elderly in Yemen”
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/05/middleeast/yemen-violence-nuns-elderly-killed/
Steve Pierson says
Some Muslims see this for what it is: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Demsci says
Asra Nomani et al are from the Muslim Reform Movement. Not very popular among Muslims as yet.
But offering an alternative interpretation of Islam. And mind you, based on Quran-Sahih-hadiths-Sira and not on Al Ghazali, 4 schools of thought, Mullahs of Wahhabism, Muslim Brotherhood, Or ayatollahs, who ALL can be seen as pure human, fallible, interlopers.
Al Azhar, the 4 schools, the ayatollahs are without ultimate authority, which they themselves further undermine with their tenet of deathpenalty for apostasy, which in effect of course prohibits throwing out on their authority all Muslims who deviate from their “right” interpretation of Islam.
Further arguments that Islam on principle, if not accepted by the Muslim-majority, IS multi-interpretable.
Now look at modern Western-nation-Muslima’s; They cannot, in majority, relish the idea of living in states like Iran, Saudi, IS, Taliban! So on principle the Muslim Reform Movement should suit them very well.
And if Muslims and PC’s remain stubborn rigid in their current stances; well, we can point to the ever-rising (in popularity) of anti-Islam-parties and politicians to put pressure on them and their myopic viewpoints and demand some kind of loyalty-choice from them. And the Muslim Reform Movement clearly is in favor of democratic secular government!
Dave Flang says
As Muslim Women, We ask You not to Wear the Hijab
The Remorseless Headsman" says
I vote for “Try on a string bikini day”. This way the muslimas can get a taste of western freedom. All in the pursuit of understanding each other’s culture of course.
rolf wittwer says
“Islam doesn’t oppress…”
Oh – yeah! But the freedom of Western civilization and its values…..!
Sickening ideology, led by stone age fanatics.
Laurence says
I just want to know one thing: When is “Burqa Day”, meshed screen for eyes, gloves and all? I’d like to know how many Western based fashionistas, younger and older, rush to wear such a ghoulish garb.
Fred says
Great! Stupid liberal college woman wearing Islamic had bags? To show real solidarity with their Islamic sisters, they need to undergo clitorectomies, be beaten by their husbands, and Herod only half as much as their male siblings and experience a stoning for being raped.-
Wellington says
Yet another example of the enabling of evil, made all the more despicable because it is done at a Catholic institution of higher learning (now lower learning?) even though in Islamic theology Jesus is one of the greater Muslim prophets before Mohammed and who will come back at the end of the world, per Islamic belief, to, among other things, throw Christians en masse into Hell for deifying him.
On an even larger issue, I must state again what I have stated several times before at JW, and that is that the current hierarchy of the Catholic Church, including the present Pope, bishops galore and Catholic college administrators, is not only failing traditional Catholicism but is actually betraying Western Civilization. Yes, it has become this awful. By now, one knows this or should know it.
Kepha says
Wellington, these Popish prelates are doing all the running they can in order to remain a respectful five paces behind their cultured despisers.
Carolyne says
Catholicism has also repressed women since its outset. Can women be priests? Didn’t women have to cover their hair in church until recently? Doesn’t Catholicism require that women not use birth control and to become nothing but breeders for more little Catholics? Weren’t services conducted in Latin until relatively recently? Sort of like the Koran being in Arabic which few Muslims can read?
All religions repress women and have the philosophy that women are inferior to men. “Women keep silent in church!” Didn’t St. Paul say that?
I once walked out of a service at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London because the priest’s sermon was on that subject, “Women keep silent in church.”
Yes, all religions treat women as second class. Islam is just the worst.
The Catholic church even discriminates against non-royals. Royal women may wear white when meeting the pope. Those of us of peasant stock must wear black. The Catholic church, for a price, doles out noble titles—Rose Kennedy was a Countess.
I won’t even go into paying for a divorce in the Church.
I just cannot and will not believe such nonsense.
Mo says
What idiocy. If I ruled the world, I’d send them to a sharia enforcing country, where they could wear the hijab to their heart’s content.
What really should be said to these ignorant Western women is, “Do you support the right of women to NOT wear the hijab?”
dumbledoresarmy says
What would have happened if someone had set up a rival booth inviting people to don Swastika armbands in solidarity with the poor, persecuted, vilified Neo-Nazis?
Or a booth where people could signal their tolerance and acceptance of the equality of all belief-systems, by donning KKK hoods and robes and then ostentatiously prancing around campus in them all day?
Same thing as donning Hijab, so far as *I’m* concerned; donning the Gang Colours of a ruthless supremacist, intolerant and murderous belief system.
And *this* belief system, Islam, is far bigger, older and nastier – with a bigger body-count, still rising – than any of its rivals-in-evil whether historic or current.
Claire V. says
I’d like to see an FGM booth.
Donovan Nuera says
I propose that from now on, hijabs and niqabs, and burkas be referred to as “GENOCIDEWEAR” or “GENOCIDE-ATTIRE”.
pass it on!
Mockingjay says
“Islamic Awareness Week” – Hey – that’s a great idea – why don’t we organize something under that heading also?!
mortimer says
How about an International HIJAB FREE Day?
Take it off, Muslim women! You have nothing to lose but your chains.
Don Spilman says
Mort, .. What a day that will be, there’ll be rejoicing of the set free. Won’t it be wonderful to see
salim says
I asked this before: why our universities have Muslim student association? Are there Hindus, Jewish or Buddhist associations? If yes, are they as active?
mortimer says
Misogyny, enslavement, male dominance, wife-beating, honor-killing, supremacism, fascism, head-chopping, gay tossing, child raping, bashi bazi, camel urine drinking, bigotry against disbelievers.
WHERE CAN WE SIGN UP?
Hope says
What I cannot believe is the stupidity of the public! Don’t people question WHY these types of events are being held? Don’t they notice that somehow Islam is the only religion that insists on “solidarity?” Do they not ask themselves why they don’t see Sikhs hosting “Wear a Turban Day?” Or why no one is asking Muslims to try on yarmulkes or Christian jewelry crosses? Or why Muslims can’t just be Muslims without insisting the rest of us accept and condone and respect their religion? People should be asking themselves, why is this acceptance so important? Why is Islam so different from other religions in this regard? Don’t they find any of this just a little bit odd? Gee, I wonder why Islam is always right there in our faces now, 24 hours a day, when we lived very well without seeing it in America for over 200 years? People truly are like sheep. The Islamic supremacists are relying on it.
Ted Tyler says
Sorry CrossWare, but from Merriam-Webster we have:
“Definition of religion. : the belief in a god or in a group of gods. : an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods. : an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group.”
For Cult we have: “a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.”
So according to dictionary definitions, Islam is a religion. The thing that sets it apart is that it demands a very high degree of submission of all members of Islam to the rules of Islam and also demands that Muslims wage Jihad until all the world is Muslim. Non-Muslim religions focus on how you can save your soul. Islam is a political system that gives rules and methods for dealing with the unbeliever. No other religion is able to destroy so completely the minds of the victims that have been infected by Islam. Islam has a carrot that is bigger than most religions – and a stick that is vastly superior to all other religions. That is why Islam is so successful and will not be going away any time soon.
Russell Kirk Was Right says
When will they have a try-a-KKK-hood day?
Cy Halothrin (@cyhalothrin) says
Female Genital Mutilation is another Mussie custom which liberates women. Ditto for honor killings.
gravenimage says
Women try on hijabs at Boston College to show Islam doesn’t oppress women
……………………..
Let’s try this:
Jewish people try on Yellow Stars at Boston College to show Nazism doesn’t oppress Jews
This is just as absurd.
As for the rest of the grotesquely named “Islam Awareness Week”, will Dr. Zeki Saritoprak admit to students that the main role of “Jesus”–really, “Isa”–in Islam is to kill Christians who don’t convert to Islam in the Last Days?
Of course not–this Da’wa artist regularly falsely whitewashes Islam,
As for those lovely Jumu’ah Prayers, will Muslims tell the credulous students how often Infidels in Dar-al-Harb are the victims of rioting an murder after violent Muslims are incited by incendiary Kutbahs at those same Friday prayers?
“Man Beaten to Death in Mosque in ‘Religious Ritual’: ‘Kill the Kaffir!’”
http://pamelageller.com/2010/05/man-beaten-to-death-in-mosque-in-religious-ritual-kill-the-kaffir.html/
“A Hindu being beaten by Muslims in a mosque in Bangladesh. He was captured outside the mosque while going home. After Friday prayers were over, the Muslims came out and grabbed the first Hindu they could. Mr. Vimal Patak a Bangladeshi born Hindu was beaten to death with sticks as the Muslim mullahs (priests) chanted “kill
the Kafir!” (non-Muslim). With folded hands he begged for his life and died a
brutal death.”
Here’s another story:
“Egypt: Muslims Promptly Seek Out Christians To Kill After Friday Prayer Service”
https://midnightwatcher.wordpress.com/2014/04/07/egypt-muslims-promptly-seek-out-christians-to-kill-after-friday-prayer-service/
…”he said that on Friday afternoon, March 28, the entrance of Virgin and Archangel Michael Coptic Church in the Cairo suburb of Ein-Shams filled with bloodshed when Muslims returning from noon prayer in the mosque headed to the church to cause trouble…”
There are many more such cases. But you will not learn about them during “Islamic Awareness Week” at Boston College.
David M says
I hope they didn’t drive home, or weren’t there without a male guardian, as per Saudi Arabia. If they did either of these things they ruined the whole Islamic experience thing anyway.
Susan says
Yes, a Muslim woman needs a “vagina sitter” 24 hours a day! What an insane death cult Islam is! Next time I a Muslima wearing a hijab I will ask her wear her “vagina sitter is!
Westman says
Let’s not forget that bastion of religious and intellectual standards, in 2002. Saudi Arabia’s “religious police” (aka the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice) stopped Meccan schoolgirls from leaving the burning building and hindered rescue workers because the girls were not wearing correct Islamic dress. 15 schoolgirls, murdered by slavish, stupid, adherence to 7th century dogma. When men no longer think for themselves, they are truly, stupid beasts.
I can think of no more succinct example that Islam regards women to be chattel property, to be held or disposed of as a man sees fit under sharia.
Jay Boo says
— A flame shone its light upon the darkness —
Like little song birds roasting in a rotisserie cage calling out into the vast emptiness of Islam only to be forever silenced by Allah’s callous indifference to their intrinsic worth.
Good Morning Muslim world
It is time to wake up from the nightmare of Islam.
Carolyne says
This trying on a hijab to show how liberated women are in Islam is akin, IMO, to asking an African American to put on chains to show slavery isn’t so bad.
davej says
How is it that all this idiocy and violence is accepted and indeed lately promoted by the West?
It is because they call it a “religion”. Western minds are conditioned to respect religious freedom so Islam uses this sleight of hand to get a free pass on their “culture”.
The magic word “religion” turns off the critical thinking part of Western minds and replaces it with automatic respect. There exist a diversity of religions in America, both Christian variations and Sikhs, Buddhists, Hindus, etc. We don’t seem to have a major killing and bombing problem with most of them, with the exception of a few abortion or animal rights nutjobs.
If this were NOT a “religion” it would be dealt with in the same way we have had to deal with the Mafia, drug trafficking, kidnapping and extortion.
We are entirely capable of this yet we are told we must not. Why? Because its Sacred (!). The FBI is told hands off from the highest levels of Government. The Christian Churches are silent and even welcoming of this Evil. The Media is consumed with self hatred for everyone’s “Islamophobia”.
The Muslim prays before he rapes, washes his hands (so pure), prays, and rapes again. It is Sacred (!)
They believe this shit is not only a Religion, it is THE ONLY Religion (I think the men like the power, guns and sexual privileges).
We do not have to believe in it in any shape or form. Nor should we pay any respect for an organization that espouses these evil beliefs.
Instead, we, against our choice and instincts, must fight a war of, not exactly Civilizations, but definitely Civilization against Savagery.
Jay Boo says
The hijab was never meant to protect a Muslim woman’s modesty and purity.
It is meant to protect dirty old Muslim men from the responsibility of controlling their own sexual behavior toward women and fiddling around with six year old girls.
davej says
Yes, they don’t trust each other (for good reason) so women must be constantly veiled and always in the company of their religious “guardians”. The Muslim mind is testosterone fueled.with no regard to civilities, it is a rape and murder cult.
All Western women are regarded as one thing by Muslims – prey.
Children at swimming pools are now in danger. Think about it.
dlbrand says
“Why, how could anyone get the idea that Islam oppresses women and makes them cover their hair?”
Answer: By studying its authoritative texts.
Of the victims listed above and others like them, Robert asked: “Who speaks for them?”
Answer: Only those willing to suffer the costly potentially severe, possibly fatal consequences for doing so.
Mulakush says
I would like them to try the reverse.
Let muslim women try the bikini this summer at the beach.
Let us have a muslima bikini contest!
Susan says
Yes! in protest I think that a “bikini day” at the college would be wonderful! The muslima’s would be required to wear a bikini to school or be expelled! How I hate Muslims!
Demsci says
I wouldn’t go that far, nor would our Western majority allow this idea.
But my “reverse” plan is to somehow regard women in bikini as more, well, free, autonomous, proud, believing in a much better religion or lifestyle THAN Islam, AND more happy!
In other words, as the positive exception among women! (Although there are many more sorts of positive exception-women of course). As now the Muslims do see Hijab-bed women as the positive exception among women (in Western nations).
But WE can see the Hijabbed Muslima’s more like the “negative deviation”.
خَليفة says
A Muslim woman is nothing without a man, can’t leave the house without a male relative.
She can’t drive as that promotes prostitution,
She can’t have male friends
She is like the earth and her husband can “dig” where ever he wants to
She can’t refuse her husband’s desire for sex, even if his junk has puss-oozing sores
She has to keep her “lawn” mowed
She has the right to be beaten by her husband for any reason and no one has any right to ask him why he beat her
She is considered mentally deficient and inferior to men
She only gets into heaven if her husband desires it, if he has 4 wives he can only select 2 of then to go to heaven.
It’s no wonder Muslimas are blowing themselves up more and more.
Wow, sign me up, my self esteem is so slow I feel like a Muslima.
Mubarak says
I am certainly not condoning the suppression of women in the Muslim universe, but confronted with this awful misogyny from the East in our midst, we shouldn’t forget that the liberation of women in the West is still far from being completed. Does Boston College for example have gender-neutral toilets?
Mubarak says
PS: A woman – if you will excuse the expression – on TED talks makes the convincing argument with words and appearance, that gender-neutral toilets should be ubiquitous. I surmise that that definitely and for good would discombobulate Islam in the West, so why don’t we try it?
Carolyne says
Muslims don’t understand the concept of western toilets. The “Refugees” in Germany climb up on them. They are accustomed to a hole in the ground. The more advanced have a porcelain hole in the ground with a raised platform on each side for the feet. Give them a western toilet and they will climb on it and squat.
Mubarak says
Yes, but I think these Muslim toilets are more gender-neutral than ours: males and females have the same choice, whether they want to sit or stand or climb on them when they pee.
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
PS: A woman – if you will excuse the expression – on TED talks makes the convincing argument with words and appearance, that gender-neutral toilets should be ubiquitous. I surmise that that definitely and for good would discombobulate Islam in the West, so why don’t we try it?
………………….
We know that Muslim men would just use gender-neutral restrooms to gain access to female rape victims.
“UK: Three Muslims gang-raped non-Muslim teen girl in bathroom of hotel where they were celebrating Eid”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/01/uk-three-muslims-gang-raped-non-muslim-teen-girl-in-bathroom-of-hotel-where-they-were-celebrating-eid
Mubarak says
Graven: The ultimate liberation of women in our Brave New World is to turn them into men and vice versa.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Nope; I don’t have to become or pretend to be a man to be “liberated”; the ultimate liberation for any human is in Jesus, just as each IS! Yhwh didn’t make any mistakes; and He didn’t intend us to try to be other than who and what we are; neither did He create one to be “less than” the other in any way; the whole “submission” thing is misunderstood. Just as in the military or a social structure, most submit to one as their chosen leader, so a woman should submit to her husband as leader in the family unit; but that doesn’t mean she loses her identity or that she should NEVER question him, etc. Submission isn’t slavish obedience!
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
Graven: The ultimate liberation of women in our Brave New World is to turn them into men and vice versa.
…………………..
What utter rot. This is what Mohammedans say if we resist the idea that Muslims should be able to rape us with impunity. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
I am certainly not condoning the suppression of women in the Muslim universe, but confronted with this awful misogyny from the East in our midst, we shouldn’t forget that the liberation of women in the West is still far from being completed. Does Boston College for example have gender-neutral toilets?
………………………..
Good God, what rot. Women are not oppressed by a lack of gender-neutral toilets. This would only be the case if women’s restrooms were either scarcer than men’s, or were of inferior quality or cleanliness. Clearly, this is not the case.
One can make a case–one way or the other–for gender-neutral toilets, but women’s liberation is not one of them.
But Mubarak does not actually believe this, in any case–nor is he advocating for them.
How do we know?
Because he has been claiming that Western women *deserve to be raped by Muslims*.
You will find his appalling comments near the end of this thread:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/hugh-fitzgerald-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god-its-allowed-its-halal
and also on several stories about the rape of German women in Cologne and other cities on NYE. He is a nasty piece of work.
Mubarak says
Gravenboy! My own Cordelia with the heart and beard of Macduff! Your image and words beguile me! I have grown fond of you, my little, lowly megaphone! – and that is why I have screwed you tight to the top of my meccanical, oral minaret. I dig you and me, when you scream and shout my meditations out to the four corners of the earth five times a day from your Jihadi Watchtower stay. I can’t get enough of you baby, and I can assure you, that your passion for me is reciprocated. Some day the honesty will be too much; your watchtower and my minaret will touch in perfect harmony with ebony and ivory, when you also bow down towards Mecca, while I and my kufiya beheaded camel riders from Medina are tripping to begin the beguine behind your behind. –
Just a poetic Eurovision fantasy of my own, not a prophetic vision of Europe – and America alone. – – –
Furthermore, the vision is generated by the decadence of the west, where the differences of the sexes soon will be obliterated. That’s why we deserve Islam and the hijabs at Boston College and elsewhere.
The catholic community can’t turn the tide on its own and is asking the Muslims to help them. God help them!
The West is liberty and equality gone mad, and mad Muslims in the West and in the East have covenanted to abolish this madness with their superior Islamic madness. This is truly shared and squared madness – but there is method in it!
Right, Macduff?
Sandra Lee Smith says
You really can’t afford to skip those haldol doses, you know. They’re to help you maintain agrip on reality, which you have clearly lost entirely here
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
Gravenboy! My own Cordelia with the heart and beard of Macduff! Your image and words beguile me! I have grown fond of you, my little, lowly megaphone!…when you also bow down towards Mecca, while I and my kufiya beheaded camel riders from Medina are tripping to begin the beguine behind your behind. –
………………………………
Mubarak’s idea that this passes for wit is grotesque. As for his idea that my bowing down to Mecca is immanent, he can dream on.
Just so he doesn’t get too confused in his fantasies, I should let him know that he is mistaken in assuming I am “Gravenboy”.
More:
Just a poetic Eurovision fantasy of my own, not a prophetic vision of Europe – and America alone.
………………………………
Good thing he isn’t actually declaring himself a prophet–*that* would not go over well with his coreligionists.
More:
Furthermore, the vision is generated by the decadence of the west, where the differences of the sexes soon will be obliterated. That’s why we deserve Islam and the hijabs at Boston College and elsewhere.
………………………………
Right–we deserve the imposition of the slave rag, we deserve to be mass raped by Muslims.
How dare we let women attend Boston College in the first place? Pious Mohammedans certainly would not allow that…
More:
The catholic community can’t turn the tide on its own and is asking the Muslims to help them. God help them!
………………………………
The authorities at Boston College are clueless, and assume that students wearing the Hijab is just showing “solidarity”. This is suicidally foolish–but no worse than that.
The idea that they are actually surrendering to Islam so that Muslims will put female students “in their place” is sickening and false.
More:
The West is liberty and equality gone mad, and mad Muslims in the West and in the East have covenanted to abolish this madness with their superior Islamic madness. This is truly shared and squared madness – but there is method in it!
Right, Macduff?
………………………………
Utter and complete crap.The West is willfully ignorant about Islam–they are not inviting in Muhammedans to deliberately oppress and brutalize women, though that is the result.
And there is *nothing* superior about Islam–the West, with all her foibles, is superior to Islam in every way.
There is method only on the part of Muslims, who intend to impose the brutality and oppression of Shari’ah law. That is, in fact, *exactly* what the vile Mubarak is advocating here.
He may sneer at the idea of MacDuff–a reference to a previous post of his–but he is wrong to mock our opposition to Islam.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Either that or he’s seriously off his meds.
gravenimage says
Sandra, Mubarak’s problem is Islam–no meds can help that, I’m afraid.
Sandra Lee Smith says
True; there are only 2 known cures for that problem, and clearly he hasn’t taken either.
R Cole says
And the list goes on for Muslim women who have come under enormous pressure to wear the headscarf.
When the first four women ever to be elected to the Kuwaiti Parliament – and a few of whom did not wish to wear a scarf – some of their fellow male Parliamentarians walked out in protest – citing some sharia law or other.
Similarly in post revolution Tunisia – there was an uproar in their Parliament when women elected by the people refused to wear headscarves.
Clearly it’s not all wonderful.
It is a form of subjugation – because beyond persuasion – coercion is used to ensure the women don the clothing article.
Why would a 14 year old girl into flowers and other cute pink stuff – select the macabre black attire – where she was not persuaded to do so. These girls are presented with the idea and told they will go to hell if they don’t choose it.
::
It’s all an Act!
It also must be mentioned that the headscarf is used in the western world to differentiate Muslim women from non Muslim women. As in the woman in the headscarf is to be viewed as being more virtuous than her western counterparts.
But in the Islamic world it is not so simple – in the west we have women who walk the streets at night as prostitutes in scanty clothing. But in the Islamic the prostitutes on the streets at night wear – the exact same headscarf and long clothing that the other women are wearing.
Here we get into the complexities of women’s place in the Islamic society – not up against the west – but within itself.
Demsci says
“It also must be mentioned that the headscarf is used in the western world to differentiate Muslim women from non Muslim women. As in the woman in the headscarf is to be viewed as being more virtuous than her western counterparts.”//
While in Iran, Saudi, all or many Islamic nations, the Hijab, dresscode are obligatory and a form of suppression, and I loathe this very much too,
in Western Countries it is as you say; Hijab is often worn in a proud manner, almost as to separate the more virtuous from the less so women. As is demonstrated by the “whore-comparison insults non-hijab-wearing Muslima’s get from Muslims.
Asra Nomani says; We, also Muslima’s, want you NOT to wear hijabs as a token of solidariy. But that doesn’t send any message, because they ask this from Western women who never wear hijabs. While the Muslims ask Western women to wear the hijab as distinct from “normal dresscode” or lack thereof.
So my still vague idea was; Can we not imagine some distinct clothing particle, dress code that “separates the free, oppression-defying women, including ex-Muslima’s”
from the arrogant Muslima’s who wear the Hijab to look better,
and from the poor sheeplike Muslima’s, who to this day are oppressed by their menfolk, who still wear this symbol of suppression as it is used and seen by so many?
What could be a clearly distinctive peace of clothing that distinquishes a free, autonomous happy woman?!
خَليفة says
The answer is to make hijab from the same material as the Emperor’s new clothes.
This way any Muslima can were it, knowing it is of the finest material, and that only faithful and pious viewers will see the true value and worth of it.
Sandra Lee Smith says
And the rest of us can blythely ignore it!
Sandra Lee Smith says
That really is adifficult question, since, around the world, fashionable apparel varies so, and no 1 particular article comes to mind that all women, or even all western culture women, wear consistently. In my part of the world, formal is when you wear a shirt or blouse instead of a tee, and your jeans don’t have holes or patches, but other areas, that just wouldn’t cut it.
sammy says
It’s what the hijab represents which oppresses women, not the piece of material.
This piece of cloth represents the Sharia, which DOES oppress women,something which is always omitted when this voluntary concealment garb is spoken about.
gravenimage says
So true–it’s what it *represents*.
If this wasn’t the case, then the Star of David being worn as a patch by Jews in death camps during WWII would be no different from an American teenager wearing a patch with his high school team on his jeans jacket in the 1970s.
Ninsuna says
So why weren’t MEN invited to try on a hijab to show Islam doesn’t oppress women? Gads, the degree of stupidity in the contortions to accommodate diversity worship is appalling.
And when is Female Genital Mutilation Day at Boston College? Liberate a girl from her clitoris in the name of Allah. Come on, Islamophobic bigots, get with the program!
Richard Paulsen says
Shows exactly what islam is all about and how easy it is to cheat others to believe it is not. Why escape when making propaganda for that which you escaped from. Cannot be regarded as escape.
Susan says
any woman who takes part in wearing the hijab is insane. Innocent girls and women have been murdered and beaten for not wearing this symbol of hate and oppression. I would not defile and degrade myself by putting one on my body, just out of respect for those who have given their lives for not wearing one. I pray for the fools at Boston College for allowing this to happen. What a horrifying situation!
Florida Jim says
A childish game is not equivalent to being mutilated and kept a slave to some mean man who has other wives better than you.Muslims view women as sex slaves and animals to reproduce Islamic terror worldwide.
Carolyne says
I must be really, really close to satan since I do not cover my hair, I expose my neck and my wrists and legs.
Who would have known?
Sandra Lee Smith says
Funny, I do those things, as well, and happen to know Satan really doesn’t like me at all, because aI have a far better covering than any hajib!
sham says
WHO ARE ACTUALLY OPPRESSED WOMEN?
WORLD MOST LEADING RAPEST COUNTRY:
Rank Countries Amount
1 Lesotho 0.844 per 1,000 people
2 New Zealand 0.315
3 Belgium 0.299
4 Iceland 0.286
5 Norway 0.203
6 Israel 0.166
nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_percap-crime-rapes-per-capita
UN Rape Statistics:
RANK
1 United States of America 93883
2 Australia 18237
3 United Kingdom 13272
4 France 10408
5 Germany 8766
6 Russian Federation 8185
wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics
Divorce rate (most recent) by country
Rank Countries Amount
#1 United States: 4.95 per 1,000 people
#2 Puerto Rico: 4.47
#3 Russia: 3.36
#4 United Kingdom: 3.08
#5 Denmark: 2.81
#6 New Zealand: 2.63
nationmaster.com/graph/peo_div_rat-people-divorce-rate
Child sex tourism :
Thailand : 40% of prostitutes are child in Thailand
Northern Italy: 40% of prostitution affects minors.
Cambodia: 1/3 of prostitutes are child
India : 1.2 million child prostitutes
Brazil: 1.2 million child prostitutes
United States: Between 244,000 to 325,000 child prostitutes.
China: It is estimated that there are between 200,000 and 500,000 child prostitutes.
Mexico:16,000 children in Mexico were involved in prostitution
wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sex_tourism
wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_of_children
wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse
Carolyne says
Well, in Islamic countries women do not report when they have been raped because they will be stoned to death for doing so. Therefore your statistics, wherever they came from, are skewed. (If the are the product of the UN, they are most certainly favorable to Islamic countries since the UN is run and controlled by them.) However, the incidents of rape in western countries which have taken in large numbers of Muslim “refugees” is rising at an alarming rate. Oddly, the perpetrators are almost uniformly named Ahmet, Mohammed, or some variation thereof.
Demsci says
Sham. These are UN Statistics. They are dependent on 3 variables; 1. Occurrence or incidence (but not only on that!). 2. Report by the authorities to the UN. 3. Report by victims to authorities in countries, contingent on trust in authorities, trust in police by citizens. And the UN admits and declares as much in their disclaimer.
Also, your statistics are of the negative kind.
Now, think; In Democratic countries citizens trust police, authorities much more than in Islamic countries.
Moreover, it is in the Democratic countries that reporting accurately to the UN is very well monitored and controlled, because of freedom of speech. In Islamic countries the authorities are dictatorial and not controlled by free speech.
All of this means those statistics of yours do not just report about occurrence or incidence. It even may be the case that the most honest, best controlled countries, in which trust in police is highest, that precisely these countries score HIGH in such negative statistics. And Islamic countries may score low, because of fraud and distrust of police by citizens.
Now look at the positive statistics too, will you? Invariably Western Democratic Countries, including Israel and Japan score well on many positive statistics, like longevity, prosperity, happiness etc. Islamic countries heavily lag behind.
And for positive statistics nobody wants to hide the real numbers of occurrence or incidence or prevalence, and everyone tries to show and prove them, so why is this happening?
gravenimage says
Meretricious Da’wa artist sham is back with his spam:
WHO ARE ACTUALLY OPPRESSED WOMEN?
WORLD MOST LEADING RAPEST (sic) COUNTRY:
…………………………….
Firstly, sham does not tell us that women can be stoned to death for reporting rape in Dar-al-Islam, so few do. Here’s this horrifying story:
“Amnesty International: ‘Woman’ stoned to death in Somalia was 13-year-old rape victim”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/amnesty-international-woman-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-was-13-year-old-rape-victim
And then he does not admit that rape statistics for Western nations such as Sweden and Norway are so high *because of Muslim rapists*. In Oslo, for instance, *every single stranger rape* where the assailant was apprehended was committed by an immigrant from the Muslim world.
Notice he also throws in things like the divorce rate–without mentioning that under Shari’ah law it is almost impossible for a woman to get a divorce unless her husband agrees–as if being unable to flee an abusive marriage were a sign of women’s rights.
Sandra Lee Smith says
In America, even if we have been raped, we have the opportunity to overcome that, and to not be murdered by other members of our own families for it! In Islamic nations, all too often the VICTIM, not the rapist, is murdered! THAT’S the difference in an oppressive and a freer society: we don’t punish thevictims!
gravenimage says
So true, Sandra.
sham says
>>>>>>>ONLY ONE CHALLENGE <<<<<<<<
KILLING WOMEN /CHILDREN
ISLAM SAYS
Malik :: Book 21 : Hadith 21.3.10
Do not kill women or children or an aged, weak person,Do not cut down fruit-bearing trees.Do not destroy an inhabited place. Do not slaughter sheep or camels except for food. Do not burn bees and do not scatter them. Do not steal from the booty,
Malik :: Book 21 : Hadith 21.3.8
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that a son of Kab ibn Malik (Malik believed that ibn Shihab said it was Abd ar-Rahman ibn Kab) said, "The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade those who fought ibn Abi Huqayq (a treacherous jew from Madina) to kill women and children. He said that one of the men fighting had said, 'The wife of ibn Abi Huqayq began screaming and I repeatedly raised my sword against her. Then I would remember the prohibition of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so I would stop. Had it not been for that, we would have been rid of her.' "
Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 4456
……….And the of Allah (may peace be upon him) did not kill the children of the enemy, so thou shouldst not kill the children……………
Bukhari :: Book 4 :: Volume 52 :: Hadith 257,258
Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
During some of the Ghazawat of Allah's Apostle a woman was found killed, so Allah's Apostle forbade the killing of women and children.
Dawud :: Book 14 : Hadith 2608
Narrated Anas ibn Malik:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Go in Allah's name, trusting in Allah, and adhering to the religion of Allah's Apostle. Do not kill a decrepit old man, o a young infant, or a child, or a woman; do not be dishonest about booty, but collect your spoils, do right and act well, for Allah loves those who do well.
Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 4294
Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children.
Bukhari :: Book 3 :: Volume 47 :: Hadith 786
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle .
ANY RELIGION ON EARTH PROHIBITED KILLING WOMEN /CHILDREN?
BRING THE EVIDENCE FROM U'R SCRIPTURES
BIBLE SAYS
Deuteronomy 3:3-6
So the LORD our God delivered Og also, king of Bashan, with all his people into our hand, and we smote them until no survivor was left. We captured all his cities at that time; there was not a city which we did not take from them: sixty cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan. All these were cities fortified with high walls, gates and bars, besides a great many unwalled towns. We utterly destroyed them, as we did to Sihon king of Heshbon, utterly destroying the men, women and children of every city.
1 Samuel 15:3,8
Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " … He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all his people he totally destroyed with the sword
Hosea 13:16
Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword, their little ones shall be dashed in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open.
Carolyne says
The prophet (Piss be upon him) was a rapist, pedophile and murderer. I bet you’d like to kill me, wouldn’t you? That’s what Muslims do.
خَليفة says
Problem is, in Islam only Muslims are considered human, all non-believers, the kuffar, are not human, in fact a kafir has 7 intestines.
Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 65, Number 306:
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
Allah’s Apostle said, “A believer eats in one intestine (is satisfied with a little food), and a kafir (unbeliever) or a hypocrite eats in seven intestines (eats too much).”
Sandra Lee Smith says
Hot news flah: “under the hood”, only a forensic anthropologist can tell 1 from the other! The A&P is essentially the same!
gravenimage says
>>>>>>>ONLY ONE CHALLENGE <<<<<<<<
………………………………
sham has posted this spam before. But even though it has been pointed out to him–I doubt he reads replies–what is noteworthy is the ugliness this would-be apologist actually reveals:
Do not steal from the booty…
do not be dishonest about booty, but collect your spoils, do right and act well, for Allah loves those who do well…
………………………………
sham is actually admitting that Muslims pillage Infidels. The only admonishment here is that Muslims don't steal booty *from each other*. Robbing the Kaffir is fine. Worse–part of that booty is Infidel sex slaves.
Pious Muslims believe that theft and kidnapping is "doing well" as long as they don't then steal the spoils from each other. *Ugh*.
More:
Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils
………………………………
Here sham makes clear that Muslims wage Jihad against Infidels purely because they are not Muslim–and that they can be robbed with impunity. Then he simply reiterates that Muslims are not supposed to steal each others' ill-gotten gains. How repulsive.
sham is not even a good Da'wa artist.
Sandra Lee Smith says
You want to try peddling that to the Yazidi women? Or maybe the Christian women and girls? Oh wait, you can’t because your “well -doing Muslims” slaughtered them or raped and beat them to death, just as they’ve been doing for 1400 years. As to the nations that the Jews were commanded to kill, those had been given opportunity to repent their sinful ways and refused, not unlike Muslims today, so their judgment came upon them and Yhwh God sent the Jews to execute His sentence upon thmem, to collect the wages of their sins: their lifeblood. But since Allah is not the Creator, indeed not truly god at all, by the description in the Quran itself, of his character and nature, he has no right whatever to command the slaughter of those he did not create!
sham says
HIJAB SYMBOL OF MODESTY:
“O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters and the believing
women that they should cast their outer garments over their
persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be
known (as such) and not molested. And God is Oft-Forgiving, Most
Merciful.” (33:59)
“And say to the believing women that they should lower their
gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty
and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they
should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty
except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their
sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons or,
their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right
hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children
who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not
strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments.
And O ye believers! Turn ye all together towards God, that ye may
attain bliss.” (24:31)
“And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display,
like that of the former times of ignorance; and establish regular
prayer, and give regular charity; and obey God and His Apostle. And
God only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye members of
the family, and to make you pure and spotless.” (33:33)
The real objective of asking the woman to adopt a decent mode
of dressing becomes quite clear from these verses.
One: That they may be recognized.
Two: That they be not molested.
Those who live or work in different fields in society do adopt
certain patterns of dressing in order that they are identified likewise.
As far as women are concerned, it is possible, to a certain extent, to
assess their way of life and character from the very pattern of dress
that they adopt.
Prostitutes dress in such fashion as to enable those in need of
them to identify them. The Devadasis who were attached to temples
had, for purposes of identification, their own way of dressing. It may
also be seen that the Hetaerae of Greece, the Chin kuwan Jen of
China and the Gaishes of Japan – all had their own ways of dressing.
They could all be identified by this code of apparel. Those in need of
them could also be invited thereby.
The ideal woman as envisioned by Islam is modest and pious;
chaste and virtuous – she is never approached by sex starved wolves;
is not advanced upon by any with pleas for sexual gratification. This
must all be discernible from her dressing itself. That prostitutes were
to sit by windows with their breasts uncovered was a prescription in
the legal code of fifteenth century Venice. It was indeed, a prescription
for judging the quality of the available goods for those sex starved
persons who came to satisfy their craving! How strange, indeed, it is
that modern day women should have as their attire those that resemble
the ones used by the prostitutes of yesteryear to attract the possible
users of their bodies. The Qur’an, however, recommends that
believing women and those who sell their bodies must be clearly distinguishable
from each other and that, too, by the clothes that they
wear.
Carolyne says
I fail to see how covering one’s hair indicates modesty. In point of fact, because Muslim men have no self-restraint whatsoever, and are so misogynistic, they go into an uncontrollable sexual frenzy at the mere glimpse of female hair, even that of an attractive goat. Or more likely, a not-so-attractive goat. Of course they smell the same.
Sandra Lee Smith says
Well said.
خَليفة says
Definition of “Sham” – “a thing that is not what it is purported to be”
Your name says it all.
A one piece woman’s swim suit is also considered a “symbol of modesty”
Modesty is extremely subjective.
I’m sure you don’t realize how ridiculous your comments are – no one is fooled by you, except maybe you are fooling yourself.
gravenimage says
Once again, sham winds up revealing much more than he intends to:
HIJAB SYMBOL OF MODESTY:
“O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters and the believing
women that they should cast their outer garments over their
persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be
known (as such) and not molested.
………………………….
*And not molested*–this is the key point. The Hijab is not about modesty–it is telling rapist Muslims that they should not be raped, but that they should rape unveiled women instead. *Ugh*.
mahatchma says
Did you read about the Qatari airliner with all female flight crew – pilot etc, whowere not allowed to drive to their Saudi hotel. Of COURSE the garments they are forced to wear are demeanaing and dehumanizing – watch the Saudi women who board an aircraft from a civilized nation rush to the lavatory once out of Saudi airspace and come out looking like humans.
Andrea Clark says
I could care less if it’s oppressing. It’s the whole “try it on, see what it feels like to be muslim for a day”. I don’t think this tolerance would be shown towards Christianity. Christians are not the terrorists here, out to kill Muslims. I’ll make them a deal, I’ll put on a head thing if one of them wears a bikini for the day; without the scarf. Just a bikini and flop flops.
Mubarak says
Hello again and tut tut.
I don’t like to play the part of the fly in the ointment or the discord in the eco chamber here on this website, and if some of the dialectical contributors to JIHAD WATCH (Hugh Fitzgerald for instance – not to be too tut tut presumptuous) would take over my position for a moment, I would gladly resign. Also, English is not my native language.
Meanwhile: I have taken good note of my detractors on JIHAD WATCH, and I have therefore switched side in order to be more constructive. So all I am saying here and now in this context is this:
Why don’t we use the Caitlyn Jenner weapon against Islamic hijab booths? Or even better: the helicopter weapon, agent, pilot Zoey Tur? He could really send these effeminate hijabies home in ambulances!
Are there really no male Boston Collage balls, who, like their female superiors, would dare and try also to wear the hijabs and even put on make-up in sympathy and solidarity with the oppressed Muslim women all over the world? – if just for one f……, mocking day?
Men in Australia have had great success with the burqa.
gravenimage says
More from Mubarak:
Hello again and tut tut.
I don’t like to play the part of the fly in the ointment or the discord in the eco chamber here on this website, and if some of the dialectical contributors to JIHAD WATCH (Hugh Fitzgerald for instance – not to be too tut tut presumptuous) would take over my position for a moment, I would gladly resign. Also, English is not my native language.
………………………
On the thread where Hugh Fitzgerald writes about how it is a Muslim “prayer” to rape child sex slaves, the appalling Mubarak insisted that that decent man should join him in advocating that Muslim rape Western women.
It’ll be a cold day in Hell before that happens…
More:
Meanwhile: I have taken good note of my detractors on JIHAD WATCH, and I have therefore switched side in order to be more constructive. So all I am saying here and now in this context is this:
Why don’t we use the Caitlyn Jenner weapon against Islamic hijab booths? Or even better: the helicopter weapon, agent, pilot Zoey Tur? He could really send these effeminate hijabies home in ambulances!
Are there really no male Boston Collage balls, who, like their female superiors, would dare and try also to wear the hijabs and even put on make-up in sympathy and solidarity with the oppressed Muslim women all over the world? – if just for one f……, mocking day?
Men in Australia have had great success with the burqa.
………………………
What a wanker…
خَليفة says
“Mubarak the wanker” – kinda has a ring to it…
gravenimage says
Agreed!
gravenimage says
Mubarak wrote:
Meanwhile: I have taken good note of my detractors on JIHAD WATCH, and I have therefore switched side in order to be more constructive.
……………………
Nope–‘fraid not. He’s still extolling Muslim rape on this thread:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/pope-decries-europes-indifference-to-muslim-migrants-compares-them-to-jesus
Not, of course, that I’m surprised.
DFD says
Maybe they should try an FMG and/or stoning day. The stoning should of course be done by other women, to avoid offending the feminists.
Or how about a 500 lashes day? To show solidarity and understanding with women in Iran and Saudi Arabia.
They could have even atheists joining in, for the stoning, cutting and lashing; for them it would be called a Marquis de Sade day.
I wonder, is there a contest going on for ever increasing idiocies?
Carolyne says
The first time I saw a woman in a Burka (I assume it was a woman, it could have been a man or even two midgets, one standing on the other’s shoulders) I was sitting on a bench in Kensington Gardens. I went into a laughing fit (But not a sexual frenzy) and couldn’t stop laughing. I guess I could have been arrested for a hate crime.
b.c.terry says
A supposedly institution of higher learning posts gives us this dribble?
That is a statement from the obvious ignorant.
Rachel Cohen says
This is Islamic taqiyya–a part of Islamic jihad/terrorism.
Champ says
Islam doesn’t oppress women? …and I’m the Queen of England!
Anne says
These retrogressive young women donning the hijab are obviously ignorant and disrespectful of the beleaguered suffrage movement in Western civilization. They would rather pay homage to 7th century tribal mores of a raiding and rape culture. Perhaps they are used to inferior status as the catholic patriarchate bars them from priesthood to papacy.
Troybeam says
I wish these women that don the hijab would understand that it is not a choice but under sharia law all Muslim women must wear them, by wearing them these women are subjecting themselves to sharia without understanding its full meaning along with giving approval of the practice. Next thing you will be asked is to pray the Islamic pray and without knowing what it entails you become a Muslim and considered a Muslim from that point on.
Sandra Lee Smithn says
The Muslim conversion prayer is already happening with children in our schools; and they’re not told what it means, beyond that it’s an assignment in class!